2024 Mustang GT Dyno! Multiple Pulls & Correction Factors Explained
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июл 2024
- Y'all should know us well enough by now; we move quick when it comes to this type stuff. The 2024 Mustang GT has been back at LMR HQ for less than 24 hours and we've already put it on the dyno! The cars with active exhaust are rated at 486 HP / 418 TQ and the GTs without active exhaust are rated at 480 HP / 418 TQ.
Product Links
Shop 2024 Mustang Parts: lmr.com/2024-Mustang
Watch
We Discuss the 2025 Mustang GTD: • 800+HP & $300K! Is thi...
2024 Mustang GT Intake Manifold Overview: • 2024 S650 Mustang GT/D...
Relative Dyno Information
Stock Gen 4 Coyote Engine w/ ~1100 Miles
Stock 10R80 Automatic Transmission (Gearing explained in video)
3.15 Rear Gear
Active Exhaust
93 Octane Fuel
Chapters
00:00 - Intro, video explanation, & vehicle specs.
01:00 - First 5th gear dyno pull.
01:24 - First 5th gear results.
01:53 - Second 5th gear dyno pull.
02:03 - Second 5th gear results.
02:30 - 7th gear dyno pull.
02:45 - 7th gear results.
03:13 - Explaining the dyno correction factors.
03:39 - Final thoughts & outro.
#lmr #s650mustang #dyno
Use of this video is subject to the terms as set forth in our LMR Install Video Disclaimer | lmr.com/page/lmr-install-vide... 
Авто/Мото
Very interesting power curve. The previous gen starts falling after 6800rpm, this one is flat even nearing 7500rpm. The intake setup must make quite a difference.
That's because the 1:1 ratio gear in the s550 hits the 155mph limiter at 6800rpm but the engine peaks at 7100-7300 with proper fuel. Mine farted out 441whp@7150RPM (2018 gt manual) with Swedish 99octane (US94?) V power and 35F temperature. So this is worse.... s550 GT was underrated and this is meh. bravo ford for the scam marketing!
Awesome! Nice to see S650 videos!
Nice! Cannot wait for more content on the 2024!
To the point. Thank you!!
Thank you. Most of the time on RUclips from various shops, you get a crazy swing of readings depending what they want to show you. Compared to my 2017 with cold air and long tubes, your numbers are pretty close. Although, I guess like u said depending on the gearing, your RPM was way down. My comparable numbers was about at 6900-7100 rpm. Interesting and truthful video, thx
LMR IS ONE OF MY GO TO'S FOR MY MUSTANG PARTS. PLACING AN ORDER ARND 1ST OF THE MONTH
Nice vids bros 💪🏻
Man it sure will be nice to see you all do one of these with the Manual transmission! I get it,many of you all can't drive a manual transmission car so now it all makes sense
Man it sounds good
good video. nice to see the actual uncorrected numbers since thats all that matters. and since i live an hour away and we have to suffer the same weather.
Very cool, very excited to see S650 dyno pulls, those are damn good numbers stock out of the box NA.
Me too. I hate black wheels.
Love it! Everything bout this gen7. Can't wait to get one in spring. My order is in! '24 GT 5.0L w/track package/ZF 6spd/black on black. 💯 -Ohio
What do you mean with ZF 6 spd? It's has the mt82 D4 Getrag and not the ZF for the manual. Better check once again your order dude 😂
Personally I think it looks way better with brighter (stock) wheels on it.
ok boomer
Ah, this was from Lebanon Ford....I recognize it. !!!!!!!!!!!!Nice
The uncorrected numbers are real numbers.....glad you shared it!
Can’t wait to see it on another sets of wheels
Beautiful car
good on you for using SAE over STD
Love the look of the s650 in that blue...
I didn't notice but just like running a newer car on the rack there will be many lights on. They do not like seeing no front wheel speed.
Hot as hell and high as hell. That's a new song for me.
You heard it hear first. -Landan
The speed governor on those 145 whaat😂.
The mustang used to be an affordable car. Now you’re looking at $47,000 + for a base mustang GT. Take in account TTL, insurance, and maintenance and you’re driving a damn BMW.
Your money is worth less bro lots of ppl will pay 47k+ for a mustang 😂
@@openbordersforisrael6169a premium maybe, but that’s way too high for a base model.
Learn a skill and it will be more than affordable
@@GamerplusMore I have enough to spend on whatever I want. I just don’t see myself spending $50,00 for a 420hp car.
Yeah got my base 2015 5.0 $28k 0% financing monthly payment less then $400 and insurance $80. Those days are long gone though 😢
I trust the not corrected numbers more. The corrected numbers are for bragging rights and that’s about it. I’ve seen cars that make ridiculous “ corrected power” run numbers at the drag strip way slower than what the power numbers showed.
That's why I love Dragy's so much. It's hard to get to the track sometimes but with the DRagy you can get MPH numbers and the 60-130 is a great indicator of power.
Corrected numbers are so cars in different part of the world can be compared.
A Denver car that dynoes 350 whp, could very well make more power than a someone that dynoed 380 whp in Englishtown.
That’s not why correction exists. They are used to standardize across conditions.
@@justinfrazier9566That doesn’t make correction any less horse shit. The corrected numbers are a lie if you’re not driving in the perfect conditions they simulate. Which you’re not.
Ford had a big problem bk in 03 Corba days of false Hp Tq advertise numbers. There own Ford loyal people gave Ford hell for that , some die heart Ford guys went straight to GM couse of that. It was a real lawsuit by Ford owners an Ford had to pay out. Since then Ford people haven't trusted the ome advertise numbers. Over here at Gm we got more integratety then to lead the hard working Gm people astray or to lie to boost sells. If you a Ford fan girl . Take it up with Fords CEO on why he even took all through that embarrassment. God Gm Ls Lt FTW.
Pretty good at 505 hp and 440 tq.
Beautiful Mustang. From the red Calibers. It appears it's equipped with Brembo brakes normally included with the performance package. Obviously the 6 speed manual would be an easier test. From the 3.15 gear ratio you mentioned. Your test car isn't equipped with the performance package which includes 3,55 gears for the 10R80 automatic. 3.73 with the manual transmission.
The S650 looks fantastic but damn. We can already see the effects of zero competition. Not much improvement.
Looking at S650 here... wow it looks so good.
I wanna see some Gen 4 10 speed vs Gen 3 10speed comparisons. The numbers can be whatever they want, on the road action is what’s gonna speak volumes
Hopefully we can make that happen! -Landan
So the gen 3 s550 mustang dyno video you guys made put out … 416hp 389 torque
That thing looks clean as hell with those SVE R357 wheels!
I'm pretty sure these cars will grow on people soon enough.
I think the s650 looks great
they looks not that controversial
2018-23 still hasn’t grown on me😂 I was waiting for the 24 and Ford didn’t disappoint one bit. I love it 💯
S550 stang will remain highly sought after as they are tunable. Do not sell them!
All are great. Love em all! -Ohio
I’ve had my 2023 for 6 months. Factory ordered it. Never going to sell it.
Everything initially comes "untunable" until the industry catches up. Give it time and tuned gen 4 Coyotes will be what gen 3s are to gen 1 & 2s.
I see a lightning 👀
Now dyno with 93 octane ethanol free gas
Stay hydrated over in Texas. I heard the heat is brutal.
We just need some rain haha! 🤠
Dang they must have done some crazy emissions to that thing bc my 2020 made 35 more stock
Facts the 550 seems to be the better choice
1/4 mile est?
the bottom end has changed ..no? If so I see s650 bottom ends going on 2/3 heads etc...
My 16 camaro made that stock... interesting.
Do you have the number on that dyno of a stock 2018-2021 A10 3.15 car?
ruclips.net/video/NXX-d6qe9eE/видео.html
416 HP / 397 TQ
I cant wait for tuners to crack the pcm. I would love to do a swap into my 12.
Why exactly? FBO E85 and Cams will get u really close to 500 rwhp
Just stick a gen3 in it you will make around the same power 🤷🏻♂️
Just put a gen 3 bottom end on your gen 1. This engine is a Gen 3 made even more complicated.
y do they have a speed limiter on it what does that do and is their a way to take it out so i could go as fast as i want?
That's a question for a Ford engineer. I'm sure there are a few reasons as to why. At this time, it can not be removed. -Landan
Put a sticky tire on it now and get some 0-60, 1/4 mile times
About the same as what Middleton Motorsports got with their 2024,, they are doing a 6 speed car very soon
I wonder 🤔 if it break 500hp at the rear wheels with E85 headers and cold intake tune 🤔
Bro where have you been american muscle did that with the last gen
Same as a s550 😂
I am confused. My 2018 mustang gt at 460 net based out on the Dyno in many tests at 421Hp and 400 TQ and this new car which is 480 net HP is also basing out at 420hp. So where is the HP improvement for the 2024 mustang?
@michaelwittmann1895 any improvement depending on all you have mentioned seems like splitting hairs. kinda of disappointed. I will check the quarter mile difference between my 2018 mustang gt performance pack and my 2024 my new 2024 mustang gt performance pack. Besides 26 extra HP for the 24 get and the extra wieght seems to nullify and improvement.
The S650 is not an improvement on the the S550. It's just different, same with the 94-98 to 99-04 Mustang years.
They explained the gear ratio issue in the video. To get true numbers they would need a pull in 7th gear, they can’t do that because of the factory speed limiter. The only cars that can do a full dyno pull in the 1:1 are going to be the manual transmission models, and potentially the 3.73 because they won’t top out on speed, but I’m not 100% sure on the 3.73s. There have been a. Few dynos of the manuals posted, where they can get a full pull in the true 1:1 gear. The one I saw put out 440 whp 425 wheel torque
You're confused after what ford did to the '22 and '23? They didn't improve much on the s650, they instead dropped everything on the 22 and 23 to make the 24 look better. How does ford say they had to limit the 22 and 23 for epa, and put a carbon trap in the intake to suffocate the motor, then turn around in 24 and add an extra intake? Think about it. Instead of making the s650 a whole new beast, they shit on the last 2 years of the s550.
The car is a rip off lmao
420 WHP is not bad, the Car looses only 60 HP from the engine to the wheels.
but can we talk about how stock gen 2 cars made 400 whp?
gen 2 cars with a 93 tune are gonna mop lol
Dont know why ford keeps using the 5.0? It doesnt make good torque.. chevys 6.2 makes well over 400lbs of torque down low where you need it.
A single-turbo, low-boost, 6.2 makes ridiculous torque. Enough to destroy the tires on a roll.
I may be wrong, but if you Dyno it in a lower gear than 1:1, doesn’t it give you higher HP numbers ( higher than 1:1 lower HP numbers)?
No. I have no idea why everyone thinks that. If he could dyno in 8th it will make even more than 7th. Look at the green dyno graph. See how much extra power its making over 5th gear? The only reason it didn't make more peak power is because it hit the limiter. If he was able to tune this car or remove the limiter 7th gear would have made a peak power gain of around 25RWHP over 5th.
@@shawnsanders9450 so it’s the opposite of what I said? to get true HP numbers, I’m pretty sure you need to be in the 1:1 gear. If it’s not true, then why would t everyone just dyno in first gear?
@@danieljohn4603 okay so each gear you go up in will give you higher numbers. If you dynoed in a OD gear like a .86 or whatever it would give a number even higher than 1 to 1. It would be dangerous because of how fast the tires are spinning but it would give a very high number. Dynoing in 1st would give a VERY low number.
My car was the same way. My car had to be baselined in 5th to not hit the limiter. It's a 2019 GT, 3:55 rear gear, 10R80. It made 405RWHP in 5th. LT headers and a 91 octane tune later it made 429RWHP in 5th. Then we dynoed in 7th which is the 1:1 gear. It made 458RWHP. Only difference between the 429 pull and the 458 pull was it was in 7th. Not 5th. It was the exact same day. The car never came off the dyno. Wish I got a E85 dyno pull that day but it had 3/4 a tank of gas and shitty 91 octane.
Why does it have MAP sensors and MAF sensors ? Also it’s heavier then before 😅
That's a question for a Ford engineer. If I stated my thoughts, it would only be an assumption. -Landan
you think someone will be able to crack the ecu on it
Only time will tell. -Landan
Don’t they sell 2024 Mustangs in Texas yet?
They haven't made it down here just yet. -Landan
I was hoping for about 100 more hp on the new mustang. It looks really nice though.
No way that’s gt350 territory.
That's to wheels HP numbers! That means this gen 4 Coyote is making about 500hp at the crank! That's plenty of power STOCK N/A from a 5L!!!👌
In 2004 if you'd have told me a 2024 GT would have more HP than a Termi, I would've laughed. Stock for stock.
A 2011 GT makes more power than a Termi.
@@saidtheblueknight technically I'm referring to future GTs vs relevant Fords flagships.
@@saidtheblueknight I still would rather have a Terminator.
As if the S550 Mustang didn't hurt enough feelings, now you're gonna get double gapped by the S650 Mustang. Ford knew what they were doing.
So real number was 406 hp at the wheels.
What is on the front brake rotor other than the caliper?
I've yet to watch the video so Just a guess. Possibly the drift brake
@@DWH300 yeh completely forgot that
@@DWH300why would a drift brake be on the front?
That’s the rear brake not the front, the smaller caliper is a parking brake.
this car has all the tech, decent looks but nowhere near the power it needs to compete today. why are they getting slower?
Thought it was supposed to be around 475 HP, it shows only 420HP
The power ratings are in the video description. This is a chassis dyno which measures rear wheel horsepower and rear wheel torque. The ratings that are provided by Ford are at the engine's "flywheel". It takes power and torque to move the drivetrain. Think of rear wheel horsepower and torque as take home pay after taxes are taken out. -Landan
How much does it weigh?
We plan on weighing it soon. -Landan
Speed limiter? My '07 Impala does 140 mph before power is reduced. How tf... So I guess people & myself can't track these cars seriously When it gets to the top in high speed portions of the truck
Did anyone notice all those check engine lights? Park brake malfunction, blind spot malfunction, etc.
Those systems have to be disable to dyno it. Basically shutting all the traction control crap off.
It looks like a Camaro
Why were you curious if the s550 wheels are going to be compatible with s650? Those are obviously 99% identical cars even to someone who is totally car agnostic.
We were already 99.9% sure they would work, but you never know with Ford. -Landan
So
420hp
&
365tq
The weels carryover because its not a S650. Its still a S550. Well, it still SHOULD be a S550. The chassis, suspension design and all that isn't enough of a change to make it a completely new generation. A 2005 Mustang and 2014 are so unbelievably different but that's still the same generation. The 2015 Mustang has more in common with the 2024 then the 05 vs 14. In no way should it be a new generation. Gen 4 Coyote? Absolutely. S650? NOPE.
Cant wait to see the aftermarket start selling parts to get rid of the duel throttle body and cold airs.
So the car can't be dyno'd properly because of stock limiter..... interesting
In an automatic..
It's lost a fair bit of power from it's rated 486 HP.
this is wheel hp not crank hp.
@@gforce_117 413 Wheel HP divided by .85 gives 485.8 HP at the crankshaft. A 15% driveline loss is generous.
Ridiculous drivetrain loss
You all wasting your money on the s650 when it's basically the same as a gen 3 but they made it ugly. Ford got you all fooled.
So it makes the same RWHP as a Gen 3 S550 ? Lol !!!!
I’ll stick to my 1997 GT.. what a waste of money for 400 HP HAHAH
E85 Gen 4 coyotes will rip……
Aren't people slapping on On3 turbo kits on their worn out Fox Platforms and making more than that?
Seems like a bit of a no brainer that modifying a car will have it make more power than a stock basic engine no ?
@@raionshishi8290 Buying a clap out 302 from the 80's, putting a $1500.00 performance part onto it and it will achieve more power than a larger displacement engine with 35 years of technology with $45,000 price tag is embarrassing where I come from.
@@Olds_Pwr Where is that exactly, because last I checked, a simple TT setup will not cost over 5k and will gap pretty much any built car on the street. You would be lucky enough to even find a 302 and let alone have nothing to fix on it, also you are arguing about a car that gives you everything a modern car would give you under warranty, that is until you mod it of course but that's the entire point.
@@raionshishi8290 I never mentioned anything about a twin turbo. The single turbo kit that I am referring about I see is now $1900 and it comes from ON3 Performance. I don't understand what you're saying about finding a 302? 80's Mustangs came with a 302. Not everyone wants everything a modern car with a warranty. That is why some people just want a daily vehicle to get them to work, with no warranty and no car payment. Not to mention a tablet dash.
@@Olds_Pwr You seem to have short term memory loss, because I clearly referred to your previous comment that of which I was replying to that said and I quote "Buying a clap out 302 from the 80's, putting a $1500.00 performance part onto it and it will achieve more power than a larger displacement engine with 35 years of technology with $45,000 price tag is embarrassing where I come from."
This entire comment is directly talking about getting a 302, whether it's the engine or the entire car itself doesn't matter, you said it and it's what I referred to so I don't see why you can't understand what I said about finding one in mint condition for cheap.
You mention that you would put $1500 worth of performance parts in it and make more power than what we have in modern day time.
I pointed out how any modern day car with cheap performance parts installed can easily make more horsepower without even opening up the stock bottom end and this is on a warrantied car, which gives you way more than what a 80's car would which obviously makes the pricing what it is.
The moment you compared a car that is reaching almost 50 years to now is when things get complicated, because why would anyone expect a cheap pricing when looking at almost 40 years of development in a car. If you wanted a cheaper car you wouldn't be shopping for this car or any modern day car, making an argument on the price of something in modern time vs something of the past is ridiculous in itself, not to mention most cars from the past when compared to modern day cars are actually way more expensive than they should have been for what they gave feature for feature price to price.
You also failed to address how not everyone wants to go looking for a car from the 80's to fix and drive around, so I guess that's something you just want to ignore. What you dislike doesn't account for everyone or the majority, not even close. What you are describing is not even 8% of what the majority of consumers would care about or do. These cars aren't the best or the most incredible thing out there, but to act like none of it makes sense is simple turning a blind eye.
A modern day Mustang that costs 50k can do 1/4 mile in 12 seconds, run around a track as fast as many other sports cars and has features that didn't exist in cars from a decade ago. One great example is the 2013 GT500, the Mustang with the highest horsepower of that time, now worth 50k+, also did low 12 sec 1/4 mile and was incredible, but would not be able to hang with any sports car on a track of modern time or have as many features as cars do today, yet the modern car with less hp beats it in all of that for the same price basically, that is a sign of improvement in many other factors and aspects without just focusing on hp like most people tend to do when looking at pricing, this is coming from a comment that literally complained about this exact thing.
The S650 will get gapped by S550 18-23 until they get tuned.
How? If the make the same power?
its heavier@@jorgemendoza1992jm
That is a beautiful car.
I've switched over to EVs and can't get excited about going to gas stations and giving bonuses to Chevron CEOs, but man, that looks like a sweet ride.
are these safe cars to drive? how strong is the cage?
If you’re buying a mustang for safety you’re buying the wrong car get ur kid a suv lol
Most new cars are relatively safe. However the smaller the car the more dangerous (Honda fit type cars)
All cars have great safety equipment these days. But the most important safety feature is the driver. Drive like a moron, end up crashing. Learn to drive well, you’ll be fine.
That’s cute says a srt 😊
Lower HP than 2018
The s650 is laughable lol it's a neutered s550. No tuning due to locked ecu unless Ford grants access to companies such as Roush, so it is up in the air if that will get unlocked over the next few years and we're not sure what parameters can be touched. EPA really is doin a number on these newer cars, it's just gotten worse with time...
Comment nonsense below if you like balls in your mouth👇
There are already 3 tuners with the software to modify it given directly by ford.
You just figured that out?? Epa is why V8s are disappearing because the regulations get tight on mpg requirements...so Ford has to add technology to pass Cafe regulations etc ... because they wanna sell in all 50 states not 49...that means pleasing the regulators in California...
@@StaneDaynusdo you know who they are?
@@robertct06 RTR, roush and “one we aren’t allowed to mention” but obviously Shelby
@@StaneDaynus oh ok cool. I figured RTR because they’re coming out with their versions right away but wasn’t sure if they actually tuned it or just had looks and handling package and the other ones should’ve been a no brained lol. Hopefully some of the other companies can get a crack too
Should've gotten a manual #savethemanuals
We have a manual DH on order. Trust us, we prefer manuals. We needed a car asap for R&D purposes, and this car was available. -Landan
@latemodelrestoration Nice on the Dark horse, but yeah makes sense.
Yeah, those stock wheels are about as stupid looking as that gauge cluster. Nice choice on the wheels!!!
Just watch the old
One y’all did 5 years ago. Not really impressed at all. 460hp from the 18 to this 2024 486hp supposedly
S550 is still faster with one single throttle body
Now say it without crying 😂
So that's a 13.5% loss not too bad
I dont understand the dual intake. Whats the reason for this (if any)
Not a fan of the look of the car. Just doesn’t really say mustang to me anymore
Wonder what happened to that 480 HP ford claimed the GT’s had 😅
it's making 420 wheel do you know math lol that 20% DT loss all day
Tell us you know nothing about cars without telling us.
@@96lapiscoupe1As a matter of fact no, I don't know a ton about cars I'm still fairly new to everything in that world so all I know is what has been said/advertised but thanks for pointing that out in such a condescending way, It's greatly appreciated.
Waist of time putting duel throttle bodies with 412 hp dat sucks
So Instead of the promised 486 hp we getting 420 at best ?
There’s a difference between hp at the crank and hp at the wheels. Every car is like this
@@BillyBobby123 thanks man new to the car world and excited about my 2024 gt but so is this good ?
@@iceboy_2494 yea, you can look at any other of your favorite cars. They all lose a good bit putting power to the ground. Obviously there are things that can be done to increase it and some cars are better than others.
@@iceboy_2494yes the numbers it laid down at the wheels are in line with Fords crank ratings.
@@iceboy_2494 Yes, it is actually really good, it's not losing as much HP as most other cars will due to drivetrain loss, it's actually much more powerful than the past decade of Mustangs at the crank hp vs the wheels. Almost all cars have this characteristic, some have a minor issue with it because of their improve layout and drivetrain, a great example of this is the Mustang GTD, which virtually has almost no drivetrain hp loss due to how it's setup with it's carbon fiber driveshaft and transaxle transmission directly driving the wheels.
So: if the 6spd cars are dyno'd @ 440rwhp, the 85% rule puts crank hp @ 518. That's a bit stronger than the S550. Someone please dyno a 10spd with 3.73s so we can get a good 1:1 pull.
15% is not a rule and that's not how driveline loses work. It doesn't matter how much power the engine makes. The transmission will take XX amount of hp to operate. it doesn't matter if you add on a supercharger or other power adder. The transmission and other driveline will take the same amount of hp to operate and put power down regardless. the 15% is a very old school way of thinking and it's just not how things work. For example the engine makes 480bph and they got 420whp. That's 60hp parasitic loss in the drivetrain. Now add a supercharger and the engine makes 700hp. Unless you modified the transmission or driveline components. it will still have 60hp driveline loses.
s550 Mach 1 6 speed dynos at 440-450whp so this is spot on.
@@turbobros_online1561that’s incorrect, putting more power through the same drivetrain increases the losses through an increase in friction.
@@YZ-YZ- interesting. How does more power production increase friction? Where specifically does the friction happen in different components?
@@turbobros_online1561 15% of 700hp is alot more than 15% of stock hp. at 700hp you are accelerating everything in the drivetrain much faster requiring more power.
The stock basemodel GT is pretty boringly ugly 🥴
The plastic molding on the back looks really bad, why does it stick out so far?? hopefully aftermarket will fix that
My fbo 2013 GT is making more than that
Because its fbo are you dumb?
I mean it's brand new and not broken in and not tuned....it's already putting out healthy numbers for stock....when it gets turned up it'll be more efficient than your 13...
A yes, full bolt on making more hp than a stock motor, who would have thought that to be possible.
Just would think it would be putting down 500rwhp stock before fbo is all, we talking 11 years here
@@brandonjones2565 A decade of improvements isn't all about hp my dude, the responsiveness, the performance, the balance, the quality, all of that matters way more and will improve the car overall because it will actually be able to put that power down instead of having all the power and no go. The Mustang has been at the top for a long time in overall performance and sales, Dodge has been putting in tons of hp in their cars yet they struggle to actually use it, Chevy puts little effort overall but their track capabilities, Ford has that balance that has kept them alive this long.
Play the failure horns.. twin throttle bodies are a dud.
It’ll be a minute before it stops looking like a Camaro 🤷♂️
I don't know where people getting Camaro from, it looks exactly like a OG s550 just sharper.
The mustang came first and the camaro has always been a knock off "pony" car..... Ford just went retro throughout the 2000s until now hence the 90s F body throw backs.
@@eronic404it's not even the same grill shape as the Camaro this is totally mustang...these people are just repeating what others say to seem funny...
@truckercowboyed2638 I know right it's crazy people will be that simple minded and do that
If you look at the Camaro it actually took some design ques from the mustang. Just look at the 2020. Mustang and look at the 2021 Camaro 😊
and they said 500hp? 💀
500 is the dark horse and that’s at the motor. Drive train losses loses that
Who can afford a new car ..😂😂😂😂
Almost all the dyno vid on the new mustangs are laughable. No real improvement, they are basically s550 with new bodylines, interiors, and dual throttle bodies. Fewer tuning abilities, same suspension, slightly quicker steering(but overpowered). 😅 why the heck would someone spend 45 to 60k fully option(most dealer will have them) for a GT? The DH need to put out at least 480whp to truly be worth it, 60k+ ridiculous money 😂
What a ripoff 😂😂 this car is impractical af.
And two air filters?? 😂
The car is garbage