Can't forget about the case of Lucia de Berk, a nurse who was falsely accused of multiple murders and attempted murders. Years later she was exonerated, and it proves that sometimes juries can be wrong about multiple charges.
She aint innocent guys shes a serial killer even other nurses complained about her behaviour one that worked beside her said she was odd she did interview last year not long after jail on youtube
Lucy was not odd, she was an excellent nurse who most people liked. Even is she had been odd it is not evidence of being a serial killer. Since reporting restrictions have been lifted the prosecution case has fallen apart.
@ruthbashford3176 absolutely not true the prosecution case has definatley not fallen apart I read your comment and decided to take a look and her conviction is safe and will stand.
@@paulbirkbeck1790 You should take another look at her conviction because the prosecution case has fallen apart. The medical evidence has been so comprehensively discredited by medical experts including consultant neonatologists it seems as if Dewi Evans plucked it out of the air. NOT one medical expert (outside of the trial) has publicly agreed with Evans. Even the so called medical experts who agreed with this his theories at the trial have remained silent. They are wisely distancing themselves from this lunatic. The bogus spreadsheet has been exposed as a 'crock' by eminent statisticians from The Royal Statistical Society. The rest of the evidence in the case is worthless.
@@dawnsparks9207 Who do you think are killing babies in the Queens Medical Centre in Nottingham or any of the hospital units up and down the country with above average baby mortality rates? Or do we have an epidemic of serial baby killers or just sub-standard baby care?
@@annodomini7250 Most of the babies in her care were expected to live i dont believe any hospital has a higher rate of baby deaths in that time frame why do you think she has been set up dont forget autòpsia were done and the last one she was caught Tampering with the tubes
It occurs to me that the time for professional juries has arrived. The system we have at the moment is really not fit for purpose. Complex evidence is put before people who have little grasp of the subject, and it’s frightening. There should be a minimum standard of education for complex trials where a knowledge of the subject is necessary. It should not be be left as a stick a pin in the electoral roll system. I wonder how many of the jurors on the Lucy Let y trial had any idea of the complexities of neo natal care? Work needs to be done and changes made.
I agree..think of HOW long solicitors and barristers and judges have to study to understand the law...and then you get some rabble in for a shambles of a trial!NOT only this one..happens all the time...jurors that are unsuitable for the role..
@@dawnsparks9207 as time has gone by juries gave got worse , there was a time when they turned up looking tidy and presentable, now they appear in anything, I’m surprised more Judges don’t object, as they are permitted to do . Some if them have baseball caps welded to their heads, and they think they are fit to decide someone’s future!
Hmmmm, or an extra member of the jury is needed. An AI (computer) member, that works on facts and is accurate? The AI member may not be correct, but it’s opinion would be useful. This case in particular, gets to the emotions of the jury members, given the nature of the crimes.
This would cause severe democratic problems and rights would be lost and it would allow entry to serious corruption in the world of justice so no we definitely shouldnt do that
What evidence? The babies Lucy was supposed to have murdered had post mortems and were found to have died from natural causes. Unless of course you believe the long retired, discredited paediatrician, Dewi Evans, who fantasized about air embolisms and insulin poisoning. It is obvious to anyone who has the ability to think for themselves that Lucy is innocent.
@@jono1457-qd9ft The source of the prosecution evidence is a discredited, long retired paediatrician who admitted in court he was not an expert witness.
They didn't , Try actually following the case , She fabricated numerous medical records and was practically caught in the act attacking one child , Two seperate juries have found her guilty now
@@tillyt4054 the second judge allowed the previous convictions in the recent trial to be admitted as evidence to the court of her wrongdoings... nothing fishy about that at all
Having read the facts of this case, the fact that Lucy was found guilty at all is an absolute travesty. Poor Lucy is paying for the incompetence of others who aren’t honest enough to admit their shortcomings. That the justice system in this country can’t see the truth leaves us knowing that none of us will truly get justice when the system is as corrupt as this.
@@paulinearis4823 Yes poor babies to be born in the Countess of Chester hospital and poor Lucy having the misfortune to work in that terrible place with psychopathic doctors.
WHY are people with no concept of prison running prisons, this is a place of time out, from society, NOTHING MORE and the inmates must not be allowed to run the prison, to many naive people as officers, military background is what is needed, familiarity breeds contempt, this is why we need people who will not allow inmates to dominate and management need to back them.
The woman is a compulsive liar, she altered notes to distance herself from babies that had collapsed, she claimed to see one baby that was pale that was in a cot with a canopy placed in a dimly lit room, the nurse remembers standing with Letby was right next to letby and she could barly see the baby let alone see if it was pale. She was found not to escalate babies conditions that should have been, she claimed she had NO way of contacting any doctor at the hospital. She tried to blame poor pluming but asked if she'd reported any such issue she had not done so. Doctors noted many of the babies had strange discolouring after they had taken ill colouring they had never seen before Letby denies what the doctors saw, Letby was not just on shift for all the deaths, she was there at the cot or in the same nursery. She wasn't convicted on the fact she was there for all of the crimes there is loads of evidence against her. The police have said because she was there for all the crimes she may hold a lot of info about who did murder the babies. The more investigating they did though the more things pointed at Letby. When they searched her house they found 250 confidential handover sheets many of dead babies that she was accused of murdering, some under her bed in bags. SHe was carrying a bundle of these sheets back and to to work. Police found some in a box at her parents house with "KEEP" written on the box. Letby said she kept the sheets because she liked to collect paper she admitted she should not have been in possession of them because of the sensitive information. She had one handover that was thrown in the confidential waste bin by another nurse at the hospital, when letby was asked how she had it under her bed Letby said she did not know how it got out of the bin and in her pocket. She claimed many times she was not the first on the scene of some of the babies but then was proved to be lying. She would say " I called for Ashley who came in", then claims Ashley was already in the room or she could have come in through the door,. And there are so many instances where she claims she cannot answer the question being being asked again and again she changes her evidence. Letby even contradicts the parents of dead babies and denies what parent heard her say She has just been found guilty of attempted murder. A doctor walked into a nursery where Letby was standing near the cot. The Dr noticed the oxygen of the baby was falling and had been for around a some time - when Letby was asked about this she said she said she was waiting to see if the baby would self correct. But the length of time was not acceptable and was deemed attempted manslaugter. She claimed several times she used her phone to text friends as it was common practice but never at cotside and yet she had to admit that she was feeding a baby while texting her friend and the only way she could have done so in the time it happend was by using a plunger to force the feed into the baby.
Exactly right - Letby is a compulsive liar. She even lied about the clothes she was arrested in, to gain sympathy, even though the video footage proved she is a liar. People say there is no evidence because she wasn’t caught injecting babies with air or insulin. Someone did that but some people want to blame someone else without saying who that was. Peter Sutcliffe was never caught in the act of killing his victims, nor Moors murderers, in fact, how many convicted murderers were actually caught in the act of murder? Not many
There is NO direct evidence that Lucy did anything wrong - NONE There's not even any circumstantial evidence that is remotely convincing. Quite frankly your post is just waffle, much of it can't be substantiated. Lucy was the only witness expected to have a perfect memory, the doctors who could not remember or contradicted themselves get a free pass.
The babies Lucy was supposed to have murdered died from natural causes and sub optimal care. 6 of the 7 babies had post mortems and 5 were found to have died from natural causes, baby's As death was unascertained but there was nothing suspicious about it. Baby E had no post mortem but died from sub optimal care. If there had been any suspicion of foul play the Coroner would have been informed and the bodies re-examined by a forensic pathologist.
@@annodomini7250 8 long time consuming years sifting through her behaviour. A Consultant stood behind her, watching her NOT doing her Emergency Procedure was the final piece of the jigsaw VISUAL EVIDENCE. Please don't defend a Narcissistic Psychopathy.
Well her parents have been very quiet not sure i would bé if my daughter was fitted up. Her friends also have not gone to the press a case like this you would expected to have heard alot Moré noise
@SCAM-BUSTER.777 If I had been on the jury I probably would have found lucy guilty but I wouldn't have known then that the medical evidence was crap and the spreadsheet was a crock. That would have made all the difference.
@@dawnsparks9207 Her friends have spoken to the press and they don't believe Lucy is guilty. Lucy's parents must be in a state of shock but I'm sure they're working behind the scenes to help free their innocent daughter.
@amandajohnson-williams7718 An you need to read an listen to all the people in the medical profession that have made an absolute mockery of the prosecutions , consultants an the police's so called evidence an theories since this farce of a trial first begun. The podcasts, channels etc are all out there. It seems clear to me that the ones who are hellbent on her guilt, are the ones that refuse to watch them. This was all about money an reputation. This is the NHS we are talkin about. Just think for a minute, how much would've been paid out to the parents if the unit at the COCH had been found out for what it was
Have you seen her diary entries or been following the case at all? Might be worth familiarising yourself with them beforehand and then see what you think. But I’m with the majority on this and I believe she is definitely guilty.
@Ellie-vv5tw Yes I have, from the beginning!! Her diary entries?!! Yes, we heard all about them didn't we?! So what?? Christ's sake, your gonna have to do better than that!!!
@@bradleyday5829 This case is too important and profound for me to try to be polite to you Bradley, so I won't attempt to be, my view is you are simply speaking out of your a** here
@@paulbirkbeck1790 I think some are actually mentally ill, they are so desperate to convince other people she is innocent or a scapegoat that they will ignore all of the evidence that convicted her.
We're was the doctors to double check all these things..there were plenty plenty docs n nurses then...oh but then again they bought their certs didn't they...
Did you not follow the story? Are you not aware of the doctor who was disciplined by the hospital management for reporting her more than. He begged them to investigate and they refused. One nurse who reported her was ignored right up until the verdict! This was part of what was so shocking. Her team reported to management who did nothing and made the doctor APOLOGIZE to her!
It doesn't make sense Colin, but that doesn't mean she didn't cause all the suffering and deaths she inflicted. She knew she had been found out when she was arrested.
Lucy Letby - Multi-Baby Killer is enjoying her life - In a Privately run Prison, in a LUXURY cell - sorry - LUXURY Apartment - FULL of LUXURY Modern Conveniences!!! ALL other HM Residents have got to wait MONTHS to get these LUXURIES - She's only gone and won the "Lottery"!!! If she lived near you, then PLEASE report this to your present/future M.P. This is a slap-in-the-face for all the Baby's parents!!! And a slap-in-the-face for Justice!!!
I honestly don't know if she's innocent or not..but I don't think that the prosecution proved her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt..and I don't know how ANYONE could send someone away on the evidence presented
@@Swansong321 They started investigating her in 2016. 8 years of investigation. And a consultant stood at the back of her watching what she wasn't doing. Comes to the Absolute Judgement: 🔥 GUILTY 🔥 8 years of investigation.
Peter Bleksley owes Lucy Letby an apology as she will not be spending "The Rest Of Her Sad, MISERABLE Existence In Jail" as she is completely innocent. The case is really beginning to fall apart. There are two brilliant articles in the Guardian and Telegraph detailing the actual FACTS in the case that Bleksley has obviously never heard of. Having researched the case I know most of these FACTS but now they are getting out to a wider audience.
The CQC Inspection Report revealed many issues on the Neonatal Ward. Page 113 is a good place to start reading! Was Lucy Letby the original Whistleblower? Where are the tape recordings? Take a look for yourselves!
But she will live. Live the high life... With no worries. Free food, free heat, free bed, free entertainment, free service from the guards, sound pretty good deal in there. And no mention to her colleagues that covered for her. Where are they now?
So much for "trials-by-jury"! This type of trial would be illegal in most mainland European countries - certainly in the Netherlands. They can lead to gross misconducts of Justice not least because of its rigid, procedural constraints - and because jurors are usually common folk picked up at random (and in this case) without the right medical qualifications. One needs only to read what medical scientists are saying! Professor Emeritus Richard D. Gill - of nurse Lucia de Berk fame (quoted below) is one of them. Google for more details.
Shes gulity period not wrongly accused even the consultant caught her red handed with the baby girl as he walked in died three days later the sick psyopath
Dr Jayaram said he caught Lucy virtually read handed attempting to kill a baby then did absolutely nothing about it for over a year. Jayaram is a proven liar and yes he is a sick psychopath alone with Dr Brearey.
@@dawnsparks9207 they love to comment on other ethnicity but when it's their own they love to remain silent no consistency so actually it has a lot to do with them
@@jlhus5615 we know she is English we dont need telling if its somone not from our country just like say in Amèrica they state where they are from we have the right to know. The Love of my life is my first grandson 4months old he is mixed race just before you use the race Card The victims are Moré important anyway why are you so bothered about the criminal
Can't forget about the case of Lucia de Berk, a nurse who was falsely accused of multiple murders and attempted murders. Years later she was exonerated, and it proves that sometimes juries can be wrong about multiple charges.
Does this apply to every single person ever convicted of murder? Were Rose West and Myra Hindley falsely accused?
@@TheAikenHead No of course not but the flaws in the evidence at Lucy Letby's trials are glaringly obvious to anyone who can think for themselves.
Sometimes ? Many many times
@@TheAikenHeaddo you think it does ?
What relevance does this have with Letby? Absolutely none.
She aint innocent guys shes a serial killer even other nurses complained about her behaviour one that worked beside her said she was odd she did interview last year not long after jail on youtube
Here for the answers you'll get about no evidence and "quirky" etc
Lucy was not odd, she was an excellent nurse who most people liked. Even is she had been odd it is not evidence of being a serial killer. Since reporting restrictions have been lifted the prosecution case has fallen apart.
@ruthbashford3176 absolutely not true the prosecution case has definatley not fallen apart I read your comment and decided to take a look and her conviction is safe and will stand.
@@paulbirkbeck1790 You should take another look at her conviction because the prosecution case has fallen apart.
The medical evidence has been so comprehensively discredited by medical experts including consultant neonatologists it seems as if Dewi Evans plucked it out of the air.
NOT one medical expert (outside of the trial) has publicly agreed with Evans. Even the so called medical experts who agreed with this his theories at the trial have remained silent. They are wisely distancing themselves from this lunatic.
The bogus spreadsheet has been exposed as a 'crock' by eminent statisticians from
The Royal Statistical Society.
The rest of the evidence in the case is worthless.
Something very wrong about all this. Look at how many mothers and babies have died in maternity units all over the UK.
All over the uk NOT in one hospital in that space of time this case another Staff member walked in on her. The hospital admin. Now need investagating
@@dawnsparks9207 Lucy is innocent.
@@annodomini7250 who do you think killed those innocent babies why is Lucy innocent
@@dawnsparks9207 Who do you think are killing babies in the Queens Medical Centre in Nottingham or any of the hospital units up and down the country with above average baby mortality rates? Or do we have an epidemic of serial baby killers or just sub-standard baby care?
@@annodomini7250 Most of the babies in her care were expected to live i dont believe any hospital has a higher rate of baby deaths in that time frame why do you think she has been set up dont forget autòpsia were done and the last one she was caught Tampering with the tubes
Lucy Letby would not be the first victim to be thrown to the wolves to spare the real criminals their blushes.
It occurs to me that the time for professional juries has arrived. The system we have at the moment is really not fit for purpose. Complex evidence is put before people who have little grasp of the subject, and it’s frightening. There should be a minimum standard of education for complex trials where a knowledge of the subject is necessary. It should not be be left as a stick a pin in the electoral roll system. I wonder how many of the jurors on the Lucy Let y trial had any idea of the complexities of neo natal care? Work needs to be done and changes made.
I agree..think of HOW long solicitors and barristers and judges have to study to understand the law...and then you get some rabble in for a shambles of a trial!NOT only this one..happens all the time...jurors that are unsuitable for the role..
@@Swansong321 some rabble thats a bit of a insult I take you have been on the jury a FEW Times then
@@dawnsparks9207 as time has gone by juries gave got worse , there was a time when they turned up looking tidy and presentable, now they appear in anything, I’m surprised more Judges don’t object, as they are permitted to do . Some if them have baseball caps welded to their heads, and they think they are fit to decide someone’s future!
Hmmmm, or an extra member of the jury is needed. An AI (computer) member, that works on facts and is accurate? The AI member may not be correct, but it’s opinion would be useful.
This case in particular, gets to the emotions of the jury members, given the nature of the crimes.
This would cause severe democratic problems and rights would be lost and it would allow entry to serious corruption in the world of justice so no we definitely shouldnt do that
She wasn’t convicted just because she was always on duty. The evidence is there if you follow the case word for word. She is as guilty as hell.
You obviously haven't looked into the sources of the prosecution evidence.
What evidence? The babies Lucy was supposed to have murdered had post mortems and were found to have died from natural causes. Unless of course you believe the long retired, discredited paediatrician, Dewi Evans, who fantasized about air embolisms and insulin poisoning. It is obvious to anyone who has the ability to think for themselves that Lucy is innocent.
@@jono1457-qd9ft The source of the prosecution evidence is a discredited, long retired paediatrician who admitted in court he was not an expert witness.
@@ruthbashford3176 The whole case is a stitch up. Where are the high profile people who are going to stand up against this corruption?
Tell us what the medical evidence is then.
This may ultimately turn out be one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British legal history. Something so wrong about these convictions .
Something fishy going on as usually!!
How come?
Where the subpost masters wrong?
@@PeterKirkMusician 😁🤣🤣🤣🤣
And some one accepting dosh for it..for sure
@@user-sc4jy2hk5e there was,nt any forensic testing for insulin.
I don’t believe she is guilty of these crimes!
Who's guilty then? 🤔
Many parents complained about her they were ignored. She is the killer 😱
@@babdullah5025 One of the babies parents said 'she was so nice' and wanted her to be the godmother.
@@babdullah5025 The guilty ones are those who have accused an innocent nurse.
@@babdullah5025 so how about Queens Medical Centre Nottingham? Plenty of dead babies no one killing them off? Lucy scapegoat.
Usual suspect. Should we deport this one ?
How can you convict a person purely on them being on duty. It makes no sense!
They didn't , Try actually following the case , She fabricated numerous medical records and was practically caught in the act attacking one child , Two seperate juries have found her guilty now
@@tillyt4054 the second judge allowed the previous convictions in the recent trial to be admitted as evidence to the court of her wrongdoings... nothing fishy about that at all
@@tillyt4054 read the new yorker article, lots of issues with this case
She is guilty as hell
@@watchingyoutube5093 I would hve thought they would have had a good idea who she was already
Something fishy going on with this case..niggling in my gut instict that she ain't guilty.
Same with me ,she’s covering for someone ,maybe a doctor or someone
Something an attention seeker would say.
Having read the facts of this case, the fact that Lucy was found guilty at all is an absolute travesty. Poor Lucy is paying for the incompetence of others who aren’t honest enough to admit their shortcomings. That the justice system in this country can’t see the truth leaves us knowing that none of us will truly get justice when the system is as corrupt as this.
Don’t you mean poor babies?
@@paulinearis4823 Yes poor babies to be born in the Countess of Chester hospital and poor Lucy having the misfortune to work in that terrible place with psychopathic doctors.
I was in prison for 13 and half months. Hmp berwyn it has 2100 people in that prison alone. Absolutely full to the brim.
@@ButchersBoys yes I did six years in there it was packed
WHY are people with no concept of prison running prisons, this is a place of time out, from society, NOTHING MORE and the inmates must not be allowed to run the prison, to many naive people as officers, military background is what is needed, familiarity breeds contempt, this is why we need people who will not allow inmates to dominate and management need to back them.
The woman is a compulsive liar, she altered notes to distance herself from babies that had collapsed, she claimed to see one baby that was pale that was in a cot with a canopy placed in a dimly lit room, the nurse remembers standing with Letby was right next to letby and she could barly see the baby let alone see if it was pale. She was found not to escalate babies conditions that should have been, she claimed she had NO way of contacting any doctor at the hospital. She tried to blame poor pluming but asked if she'd reported any such issue she had not done so. Doctors noted many of the babies had strange discolouring after they had taken ill colouring they had never seen before Letby denies what the doctors saw, Letby was not just on shift for all the deaths, she was there at the cot or in the same nursery. She wasn't convicted on the fact she was there for all of the crimes there is loads of evidence against her. The police have said because she was there for all the crimes she may hold a lot of info about who did murder the babies. The more investigating they did though the more things pointed at Letby. When they searched her house they found 250 confidential handover sheets many of dead babies that she was accused of murdering, some under her bed in bags. SHe was carrying a bundle of these sheets back and to to work. Police found some in a box at her parents house with "KEEP" written on the box. Letby said she kept the sheets because she liked to collect paper she admitted she should not have been in possession of them because of the sensitive information. She had one handover that was thrown in the confidential waste bin by another nurse at the hospital, when letby was asked how she had it under her bed Letby said she did not know how it got out of the bin and in her pocket. She claimed many times she was not the first on the scene of some of the babies but then was proved to be lying. She would say " I called for Ashley who came in", then claims Ashley was already in the room or she could have come in through the door,. And there are so many instances where she claims she cannot answer the question being being asked again and again she changes her evidence. Letby even contradicts the parents of dead babies and denies what parent heard her say
She has just been found guilty of attempted murder. A doctor walked into a nursery where Letby was standing near the cot. The Dr noticed the oxygen of the baby was falling and had been for around a some time - when Letby was asked about this she said she said she was waiting to see if the baby would self correct. But the length of time was not acceptable and was deemed attempted manslaugter.
She claimed several times she used her phone to text friends as it was common practice but never at cotside and yet she had to admit that she was feeding a baby while texting her friend and the only way she could have done so in the time it happend was by using a plunger to force the feed into the baby.
Exactly right - Letby is a compulsive liar. She even lied about the clothes she was arrested in, to gain sympathy, even though the video footage proved she is a liar. People say there is no evidence because she wasn’t caught injecting babies with air or insulin. Someone did that but some people want to blame someone else without saying who that was. Peter Sutcliffe was never caught in the act of killing his victims, nor Moors murderers, in fact, how many convicted murderers were actually caught in the act of murder? Not many
There is NO direct evidence that Lucy did anything wrong - NONE There's not even any circumstantial evidence that is remotely convincing.
Quite frankly your post is just waffle, much of it can't be substantiated. Lucy was the only witness expected to have a perfect memory, the doctors who could not remember or contradicted themselves get a free pass.
The babies Lucy was supposed to have murdered died from natural causes and sub optimal care. 6 of the 7 babies had post mortems and 5 were found to have died from natural causes, baby's As death was unascertained but there was nothing suspicious about it. Baby E had no post mortem but died from sub optimal care.
If there had been any suspicion of foul play the Coroner would have been informed and the bodies re-examined by a forensic pathologist.
Shes innocent! Wake up people.
Thank God you weren't on the jury.
@@SCAM-BUSTER.777 Have you seen the evidence, it is ambiguous at best.
@@annodomini7250
8 long time consuming years sifting through her behaviour.
A Consultant stood behind her, watching her NOT doing her Emergency Procedure was the final piece of the jigsaw VISUAL EVIDENCE.
Please don't defend a Narcissistic Psychopathy.
Are you her boyfriend LoL.
@@annodomini7250
8 years of investigating. 🤷♂️
Horrific them poor parents of those babies 😢 must be so devastating for you all
Does the UK deport non British citizens who break the law ?
not guilty,, fit up in plain sight
I'm sure we're glad they didn't pick you for the jury.
Well her parents have been very quiet not sure i would bé if my daughter was fitted up. Her friends also have not gone to the press a case like this you would expected to have heard alot Moré noise
@@dawnsparks9207
Maybe a loner?
No friends?
@SCAM-BUSTER.777 If I had been on the jury I probably would have found lucy guilty but I wouldn't have known then that the medical evidence was crap and the spreadsheet was a crock. That would have made all the difference.
@@dawnsparks9207 Her friends have spoken to the press and they don't believe Lucy is guilty. Lucy's parents must be in a state of shock but I'm sure they're working behind the scenes to help free their innocent daughter.
The flaws in the evidence are so glaringly obvious to anyone who has the ability to think for themselves.
You'll be saying Bamber's innocent next!!!
Something just doesn't add up about this I'm not convinced she is Guilty,
You need to read more of the evidence and details of the police investigation. She's Guilty alright!
@amandajohnson-williams7718
An you need to read an listen to all the people in the medical profession that have made an absolute mockery of the prosecutions , consultants an the police's so called evidence an theories since this farce of a trial first begun.
The podcasts, channels etc are all out there.
It seems clear to me that the ones who are hellbent on her guilt, are the ones that refuse to watch them.
This was all about money an reputation.
This is the NHS we are talkin about.
Just think for a minute, how much would've been paid out to the parents if the unit at the COCH had been found out for what it was
Have you seen her diary entries or been following the case at all? Might be worth familiarising yourself with them beforehand and then see what you think. But I’m with the majority on this and I believe she is definitely guilty.
@Ellie-vv5tw
Yes I have, from the beginning!!
Her diary entries?!!
Yes, we heard all about them didn't we?!
So what??
Christ's sake, your gonna have to do better than that!!!
@@bradleyday5829
This case is too important and profound for me to try to be polite to you Bradley, so I won't attempt to be, my view is you are simply speaking out of your a** here
She did not do this
Who did?
Please take your irrefutable proof to the courts immediately and have her exonerated.
@@itsmeagain7825 lol 😆 nice one, all these do Gooders who know she didn't do it but can't help her.
@@paulbirkbeck1790 I think some are actually mentally ill, they are so desperate to convince other people she is innocent or a scapegoat that they will ignore all of the evidence that convicted her.
Yes, she did.
Convicted by two separate juries.
Guilty as sin.
We're was the doctors to double check all these things..there were plenty plenty docs n nurses then...oh but then again they bought their certs didn't they...
She obviously did the evil when they weren't watching her.
Did you not follow the story? Are you not aware of the doctor who was disciplined by the hospital management for reporting her more than. He begged them to investigate and they refused. One nurse who reported her was ignored right up until the verdict! This was part of what was so shocking. Her team reported to management who did nothing and made the doctor APOLOGIZE to her!
@SM-cz5od
Another Post Office type cover up.
@@SCAM-BUSTER.777 Yep. Those managers have gone on to get other jobs. One as a chief Exec in another Trust.
Inquiries* not Enquiries.
Why aren’t you Letby cheerleaders defending Beverly Allitt?
Beverly Allitt is guilty, Lucy Letby is not!
You can't grow prisons
You can build them though! And don’t tell me that we can’t afford it.
Yeah you can
@johnkeating4221 she is not a victim as anybody with the meanest of intelligence would know.
It doesn't make sense Colin, but that doesn't mean she didn't cause all the suffering and deaths she inflicted. She knew she had been found out when she was arrested.
Lucy Letby - Multi-Baby Killer is enjoying her life - In a Privately run Prison, in a LUXURY cell - sorry - LUXURY Apartment - FULL of LUXURY Modern Conveniences!!!
ALL other HM Residents have got to wait MONTHS to get these LUXURIES - She's only gone and won the "Lottery"!!!
If she lived near you, then PLEASE report this to your present/future M.P.
This is a slap-in-the-face for all the Baby's parents!!!
And a slap-in-the-face for Justice!!!
I honestly don't know if she's innocent or not..but I don't think that the prosecution proved her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt..and I don't know how ANYONE could send someone away on the evidence presented
@@Swansong321
They started investigating her in 2016.
8 years of investigation.
And a consultant stood at the back of her watching what she wasn't doing.
Comes to the
Absolute Judgement:
🔥 GUILTY 🔥
8 years of investigation.
@SCAM-BUSTER.777 Yes 8 years of police investigations that revealed nothing. The majority of the police evidence against Lucy was worthless.
Only trust God, not human beings
You trust a thing that nobody can prove exists? Delusional.....
Peter Bleksley owes Lucy Letby an apology as she will not be spending "The Rest Of Her Sad, MISERABLE Existence In Jail" as she is completely innocent.
The case is really beginning to fall apart. There are two brilliant articles in the Guardian and Telegraph detailing the actual FACTS in the case that Bleksley has obviously never heard of. Having researched the case I know most of these FACTS but now they are getting out to a wider audience.
The CQC Inspection Report revealed many issues on the Neonatal Ward.
Page 113 is a good place to start reading!
Was Lucy Letby the original Whistleblower?
Where are the tape recordings?
Take a look for yourselves!
There needs to be a neutral government body to help families get justice, with police involvement and through investigations.
God, this guys accent does the ears.
But she will live.
Live the high life... With no worries. Free food, free heat, free bed, free entertainment, free service from the guards, sound pretty good deal in there.
And no mention to her colleagues that covered for her. Where are they now?
have you been to prison? mr misinformed
You call that high life?
Go to prison then, if its that good.
@@Craig121000 well that bad thing is that you can't come and go as you please. So, no, I'm not wanting that. But everything else still stands.
So much for "trials-by-jury"! This type of trial would be illegal in most mainland European countries - certainly in the Netherlands. They can lead to gross misconducts of Justice not least because of its rigid, procedural constraints - and because jurors are usually common folk picked up at random (and in this case) without the right medical qualifications. One needs only to read what medical scientists are saying! Professor Emeritus Richard D. Gill - of nurse Lucia de Berk fame (quoted below) is one of them. Google for more details.
Shes gulity period not wrongly accused even the consultant caught her red handed with the baby girl as he walked in died three days later the sick psyopath
She was not caught "red handed" doing anything
Dr Jayaram said he caught Lucy virtually read handed attempting to kill a baby then did absolutely nothing about it for over a year. Jayaram is a proven liar and yes he is a sick psychopath alone with Dr Brearey.
Yet she wasnt stopped before because this other nurses were ingorne on baby unit i bet those poor nurses have nightmares everynight or pstd
Just free everyone from every prison and death row and stop
Use to like Graham and the Everton fan ( name escapes me). Pictured Graham as much younger guy .
It dont make sence
What ? Your spelling 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@simoncampbell3144 🤣
@simoncampbell3144 it's my grandsons fone he left it here I'm just playing I don't own computer or fone lighten up a bit !!!
100% right about non responsible positions of power.
Usual suspect deport oh wait shes English lets see what the far right edls have to say about this
Edl doesn't exist anymore doughnut!
@@dean6816 it's always going to exist when the likes of Tommy Robinson is around and the far right clowns
What has the far right got to do with this case
@@dawnsparks9207 they love to comment on other ethnicity but when it's their own they love to remain silent no consistency so actually it has a lot to do with them
@@jlhus5615 we know she is English we dont need telling if its somone not from our country just like say in Amèrica they state where they are from we have the right to know. The Love of my life is my first grandson 4months old he is mixed race just before you use the race Card The victims are Moré important anyway why are you so bothered about the criminal
We all know she'll be out of prison in a few years..... she has a vagaina, I'm already surprised she is still in prison!
You can't keep women in prison it's too hard for them.
@KallusGarnet 99 percent of them are untouchable according to the police!
I said from day one she’s innocent look at the proof!
Whatever happened to BBC English?
I've made a very revealing comment previously.
It's the last-ish comment.
A shocking revelation.
transfer to USA prisons
I guess she will get a lesbian girlfriend in prison
so?
You volunteering? 😘
import third world and all that…
Believe all women
Anyone else think she's innocent. Huge cover up going on here i think.
Something just doesn't add up about this I'm not convinced she is Guilty
Aw well just as well doesn't matter what you think
That just reflects badly on you tbh
Shame on u
@@eddierose6442 It does matter that Lucy is innocent.
@@tillyt4054 It reflects badly on this country that an innocent nurse has been sent to prison for life for crimes she did not commit.