I think Magnus' thought process was something like...."what are the odds that a professional attention whore with a camera on him would want to look like a genius by bluffing me off a hand?" Cuz he HAS to be over bluffing and there IS a legit reason to believe he would be.
@@LightYagami-tf7ig eh, I am doing pretty well in poker, and I dont even study that much. Magnus is obviously way more smarter and a much harder worker since he didnt get to the top of chess by talent alone. He's also used to perform under stress. And I guess he has money. Magnus could go to the top incredibly fast imo. The guy has all the tools.
@@MCFoultier why would he want to play at a top level though,against adamo,Negreanu,Koon and Seidel?Screw that he should just keep playing these fools and make bank
@@LightYagami-tf7ig: Game theory wise they are not so different. Both games have decision trees where both players take actions on their turns. Chess opening theory is actually very similar to the solver solutions shown in these videos. If Magnus would study these solver solutions, he would quickly see patterns and remember an incredible number of different situations.
love your videos, please talk more about size bet heuristics, high, medium and low bets. I loved your approach in the overbet video. Congratulations on the job!!
I would love to see a video about Mariano, in his vlogs he often speaks about his thought process behind his decisions; would be great if you could analyze a few of his hands and assess his thought process
I see comments with a general idea: "This guy from tik tok will bluff a lot more to beat the world chess champion and get into clips because he is attention whore." But the opposite is also true. Magnus really doesn't want to be in clips with titles like "Zoomer Boy Bluffs Out the Champion in a HUGE Pot". Isn't Magnus an attention whore? Nick played a hand, one might say, standard, acceptable. But Magnus, at the table with fatty fishes, made a garbage 3bet with 43s: it's just minus EV, even if the solver does it with a low frequency. People have a hard time folding K5o here - come on! Your 3bet should be wide, but linear. And every professional understands this. As a result, Magnus looks like a bigger fish than his opponent. I hate tik tok and modern influencers, but Nick doesn't cause negativity. He looks calm and plays relatively well. It even seems like he took some training in poker, to be honest. I'm not sure that Magnus did.
Great video as always! I wonder if it would make more sense to use wider ranges, rather than using narrow GTO ranges and then adding in the specific hands of the players? What do you think? In that case, for example here with the river decision that Magnus faces, he might have to call a lot wider if his range is wider, and then the solution for how to play 43s could be completely different? Afterall, the real ranges the players were playing in this game will be much wider than the GTO solutions, so it would be interesting to see what the solver says given those different inputs.
If I remember correctly Magnus played a lot of hands at PS NL5k 5-6 years ago. So he is far from a beginner but it seems like he is not interested in playing poker regularly.
I think Magnus will eventually outperform a lot if he continues to play poker without struggling too much. Although in theory poker is more complex in terms of number of possible actions, I think chess is way harder in practice mainly because of 4 reasons: 1. A lot of possible actions in poker can be easily simplified to fold, check and a couple of bet sizes (e.g not a big difference if someone bets 50% or 55%), while in chess you have to keep track of 32 pieces and their position. 2. Fast chess forces good decisions / action way more than poker timers does. 3. In poker there are only 3 streets where the board is changing and worry about, in chess good players can think ahead many more moves, while adapting to opponent player actions, and change that strategy again for many moves ahead. 4. Let's not forget we are NOT talking about a decent or good chess player. We're probably talking about the best player of all times. He multi-tabled and win real life chess games since he was a kid, he was able to remember the position of pieces on all of those tables and the strategy he needs. Imho that's way more impressive and i still don't know a poker player that is multitabling and remembers every board on all the tables.
@@ciucurasbogdan2772 At 1000 hands per hour you only have a few seconds for each decision. Even if the majority are preflop folds you still have to devote at least that one second to do the decision. How is that not impressive or less impressive than your average bullet chess is beyond me.
Magnus is a thinking player and is getting prof coaching I'd assume. Also when you have a Ton of money these stakes aren't even big to them or people have some of their action possibly.
I would suggest Magnus waits a couple years. He is a super genius, but work on game first. I have no doubt he will be great at poker too. I played chess against his father on ICC years ago. We are both 2100 something, maybe he is higher now, that is his father.
Ahh.... that intro... the best ever... oh wait, I forgot why due to the degeneration of my attention span... err... what was I saying again? ..... oh yeah.... Heart emoji sparkling unicorn emoji... thx
Proper analysis IMO: River could be a spot for thin value with AK but Nick is not the player that would go for that thin value and probably would check the river here to get to show down - even with AK or any king for that matter. Magnus saying "I have so many hands that crush this board [so how could you bet]" is actually poor thinking against a kid who is not thinking in terms of Magnus' range. I would almost bet (
@@Gos1234567 I'm not. He's making a decision based upon what he believes is in Nick's head (he has so many hands crushing I shouldn't bet), and that's almost certainly what's not in Nick's head.
@@Gos1234567 I get the the education system is f&*Ked and no one has any ability to think critically anymore, but if that was in his head he wouldn't have bet.
Solver approved lol this is called exploitive poker. Solvers are a joke, I am a winning player and I use Flopzilla only, solvers are bad for hand reading development.
Magnus said there, not air, as in "There arent alot of hands that you would just go three streets with there".
Thanks for clarifying. That makes a lot more sense and is consistent with the idea that he thinks Nick doesn't have much value in that spot.
I thought he said “here” but he’s not annunciating the H, which makes it sound like air.
Staaaay balanced. The last one minute was so good. Great humour as always. Also you find a way to analyse even the most strange hands. Keep it up.
Incredible video as always. Especially the intro lol
honestly just amazed that Nick played the hand so well
I think Magnus' thought process was something like...."what are the odds that a professional attention whore with a camera on him would want to look like a genius by bluffing me off a hand?"
Cuz he HAS to be over bluffing and there IS a legit reason to believe he would be.
Not necessarily. Most of the time the amateurs in these creator games tend to underbluff and are very value heavy.
@@meltedsnowman9637 Really?I saw the Mr Beast/ninja game last year and they were going nuts
Ninja or mrbeast had 0clue how to play poker
imagine magnus decides to learn poker as hard as he can. IMAGINE the monster he would become.
poker and chess is very different, as in the part of brain used
@@LightYagami-tf7ig eh, I am doing pretty well in poker, and I dont even study that much. Magnus is obviously way more smarter and a much harder worker since he didnt get to the top of chess by talent alone. He's also used to perform under stress. And I guess he has money.
Magnus could go to the top incredibly fast imo. The guy has all the tools.
@@MCFoultier why would he want to play at a top level though,against adamo,Negreanu,Koon and Seidel?Screw that he should just keep playing these fools and make bank
@@LightYagami-tf7ig: Game theory wise they are not so different. Both games have decision trees where both players take actions on their turns. Chess opening theory is actually very similar to the solver solutions shown in these videos. If Magnus would study these solver solutions, he would quickly see patterns and remember an incredible number of different situations.
daniel negreanu is top 5 tournament players of all time and like 1400 elo in chess 💀
Quality content my man
love your videos, please talk more about size bet heuristics, high, medium and low bets. I loved your approach in the overbet video. Congratulations on the job!!
GTO poker comedy gold! All it took was building a youtube channel, educating us for years and creating poker solver software with an intuitive UI
We need a Magnus heads up challenge! Or grinding the Triton circuit clashing with Linus. That was an entertaining speech and hero call
Thanks for explaining how to think about blocking value vs unblocking folds. Makes a lot of sense now 👍
Magnus vs LLinus in a year, just waiting for it
bluffer vs bluff catcher?
llinus is overrated. i wanna see him play addamo or bonomo
I paid the internet bill today and already got the full value with this video
Jack Nicholson diabolic vibes
I would love to see a video about Mariano, in his vlogs he often speaks about his thought process behind his decisions; would be great if you could analyze a few of his hands and assess his thought process
I actually made one, but he filed a copyright strike against my channel so I had to take the vid down.
@@FindingEquilibrium damn what a jerk move, thats unfortunate, thanks for the quick reply :) I love ur videos!
I see comments with a general idea: "This guy from tik tok will bluff a lot more to beat the world chess champion and get into clips because he is attention whore." But the opposite is also true. Magnus really doesn't want to be in clips with titles like "Zoomer Boy Bluffs Out the Champion in a HUGE Pot".
Isn't Magnus an attention whore? Nick played a hand, one might say, standard, acceptable. But Magnus, at the table with fatty fishes, made a garbage 3bet with 43s: it's just minus EV, even if the solver does it with a low frequency. People have a hard time folding K5o here - come on! Your 3bet should be wide, but linear. And every professional understands this.
As a result, Magnus looks like a bigger fish than his opponent. I hate tik tok and modern influencers, but Nick doesn't cause negativity. He looks calm and plays relatively well. It even seems like he took some training in poker, to be honest. I'm not sure that Magnus did.
i haven´t laughed this good for a while!
2:13 isn't there supposed to be no phones on the live stream? HCL security at its finest. Ryan and Nick are such honest guys.
the air pour 😂
Great video as always! I wonder if it would make more sense to use wider ranges, rather than using narrow GTO ranges and then adding in the specific hands of the players? What do you think? In that case, for example here with the river decision that Magnus faces, he might have to call a lot wider if his range is wider, and then the solution for how to play 43s could be completely different? Afterall, the real ranges the players were playing in this game will be much wider than the GTO solutions, so it would be interesting to see what the solver says given those different inputs.
Solvers do this already,its called node locking
The outro was hilarious!!!
One player per hand please
If I remember correctly Magnus played a lot of hands at PS NL5k 5-6 years ago. So he is far from a beginner but it seems like he is not interested in playing poker regularly.
sure 🤡🤡🤡
EPIC LAY DOWN ❤🔥😂
7 2 game is awful because you can not bluff your draws anymore, it is a terrible trade off, though fun to see on occasions.
I think Magnus will eventually outperform a lot if he continues to play poker without struggling too much.
Although in theory poker is more complex in terms of number of possible actions, I think chess is way harder in practice mainly because of 4 reasons:
1. A lot of possible actions in poker can be easily simplified to fold, check and a couple of bet sizes (e.g not a big difference if someone bets 50% or 55%), while in chess you have to keep track of 32 pieces and their position.
2. Fast chess forces good decisions / action way more than poker timers does.
3. In poker there are only 3 streets where the board is changing and worry about, in chess good players can think ahead many more moves, while adapting to opponent player actions, and change that strategy again for many moves ahead.
4. Let's not forget we are NOT talking about a decent or good chess player. We're probably talking about the best player of all times.
He multi-tabled and win real life chess games since he was a kid, he was able to remember the position of pieces on all of those tables and the strategy he needs. Imho that's way more impressive and i still don't know a poker player that is multitabling and remembers every board on all the tables.
What the hell is poker timers. Try 4-tabling zoom.
@@ciucurasbogdan2772 At 1000 hands per hour you only have a few seconds for each decision. Even if the majority are preflop folds you still have to devote at least that one second to do the decision. How is that not impressive or less impressive than your average bullet chess is beyond me.
Hands down to your sense of humour! 😂😂😂
Interesting to imagine the comment section if Bryce had ace-king.
Genius
Nick Austin, the embodiment of TicTok brain rot. Or according to Feldmen, the cultural cross over poker has always needed.
Thanks for the lesson and the lols!! 😅
Sad to see poker being turned into a “Logan Paul” boxing-esque circus
it's not like negreanu and hellmuth aren't that either
Magnus is a thinking player and is getting prof coaching I'd assume. Also when you have a Ton of money these stakes aren't even big to them or people have some of their action possibly.
I would suggest Magnus waits a couple years. He is a super genius, but work on game first. I have no doubt he will be great at poker too. I played chess against his father on ICC years ago. We are both 2100 something, maybe he is higher now, that is his father.
Ahh.... that intro... the best ever... oh wait, I forgot why due to the degeneration of my attention span... err... what was I saying again? ..... oh yeah.... Heart emoji sparkling unicorn emoji... thx
Long live Vito Bratta!
Proper analysis IMO: River could be a spot for thin value with AK but Nick is not the player that would go for that thin value and probably would check the river here to get to show down - even with AK or any king for that matter. Magnus saying "I have so many hands that crush this board [so how could you bet]" is actually poor thinking against a kid who is not thinking in terms of Magnus' range. I would almost bet (
How is it poor thinking?youre kinda contradicting yourself here
@@Gos1234567 I'm not. He's making a decision based upon what he believes is in Nick's head (he has so many hands crushing I shouldn't bet), and that's almost certainly what's not in Nick's head.
Maybe Magnus knew that Nick had hired the most famous poker player in his world : Robbie Lew…🎉
@@harrycardillo8671 ok you know what’s in Magnus’s head, ffs the arrogance
@@Gos1234567 I get the the education system is f&*Ked and no one has any ability to think critically anymore, but if that was in his head he wouldn't have bet.
I'd recommend that man-bun kid try chess.
I always thought Nick was Elliot page
So fucking good lol😅
"I have so many hands that crush this board" so lets call with one of my worst hands...
You don't understand that statement, I see...
@@KarambaJulien explain
two whales
Solver approved lol this is called exploitive poker. Solvers are a joke, I am a winning player and I use Flopzilla only, solvers are bad for hand reading development.
Magnus is so pompous, you can tell he has like an entitlement problem, body language and speech just screams that
Bruh, he is the fucking goat.
@@Dezu123 in a completely different game, look how Ronaldo Fenomeno played just chilling
I think Magnus and Alexandra should start dating! ❤