I think the TMT technology, when using these console plugins on every mix channel, definitely makes THE difference. Just running audio through them without touching a knob does “something” I like in comparison to anything else in my arsenal of plugins. I love what they do so much, I bought them ALL (as in all of them, including Lindell 80, 50 series, console N, Focusrite SC, Amek 9099). And I use them all. As in, all SSL 4000 Es in this session, and all 80s series in that session. Incorporating the limitations mix engineers had in strictly using analog gear with these console plugins has aided tremendously in getting the results I want. Of course there’s been console plugins before these. However, I’ve never thought to use them on every channel before TMT. And I’m just realizing this video is 4 yrs old, so I feel like I’ve been living under a rock this entire time in thinking this tech was new.
Whoah!!! That G series sounds amazing!!! I actually like it two fold over the E series on the mix! It has more separation and it doesn’t hurt as much….it actually feels like it smoother
I think it’s worth mentioning that with the E (the one I bought), you only get THD when the EQ or compressor is active. With the EQ engaged you get odd harmonics, the level of which can be adjusted by the THD knob. With the compressor engaged you get mostly second harmonic which ISN’T affected by the THD knob. If neither is active there are no harmonics generated.
Makes sense, that it would generate harmonics from the sound being modified by the strip, considering it's not a saturator. Thanks that is good to know 🙂
Simply the best and only BX_SSL E vs D comparison attempt and walk-through tutorial out there, in thy virtual mundo : like an impossible crosstalk of Mr. Robinson vs Mr. Roger's neighborhoodS 🖖
Honestly the part around 2-3 minutes in where you talked about the numbering convention blew my mind 🤯 I never thought about that before! All those amazing albums and they had 4 or 6 stereo busses, while we can use that many on percussion now 😂
I got myself the E-channel. I make electronic music but I wanted some analoque warmth in my music. I like what I've heard so far and it's been a while since I've been so excited about a plugin. Great and informative video!
Excellent review. I think it is the best review on youtube for these plugins. Plugin-Alliance should load this video on their website! Btw I do have them all and like the 4000 E black knob the most. I sound wide and big even with all knobs on zero, and the channels 5 and 6 (in analog mode - stereo) sounds fenomenal. Thx Mike.
Thanks for the video Michael. Much appreciated, I just bought the SSL E-Channel from Waves for $29 bucks, and I am installing it as I type this message. From what I see with the TMT and the BX console, it seems this is a beast. I'm hoping that I will be ok with the SSL I just bought from Waves. I've seen the Waves SSL for years and it seems like this is the move they should of made in upgrading their SSL E and G channels. But maybe down the line I might buy this, $299 is where it's at now. Whew! Dam BX SSL E channel is a dam BEAST!
The SSL E-Channel is still quite good. Especially considering it was release some 10 years ago or so. Keep you eyes on sales for this one, it is definitely worth it.
Thanks for the Overview of the BX SSL 4000. Was really researching a new all around plugin to run with. This helped a lot. How do you feel it works on vocals. I primarly work on HipHop and Pop music. I've noticed the effects that it has on more natural tones of music. How about over processed sounds?
I have a ton of PA plugins but must say....these really should have been offered in one plugin (both console types). If both types were feasible to offer in the dynamics sections, then it should be practical within the filter section as well.
Hi Mike, I definitely decided for the Brainworx Focusrite CS console, would you say the SSL E is a good addition for that? Or more the SSL G? Thank you.
Hey Mike, could you please explain, in layman's terms, how to use metering in these BX SSL channel strips? It's not explained in the manual where the "sweet spot" is for these plugins, I don't know much to drive the input to get the right amount of the signal for the best performance. Usually I calibrate my VU meters around -18 dbfs RMS, but I don't understand how to use these SSL VU & dBu meters properly without having to refer to external meters.
Hi D S, Sorry I missed what should have been something obvious to cover. In a nutshell, these meters emulate the plasma meters that were designed for the SSL consoles back then. They are not digital meters in the same way that you would use a dBFS meter in your DAW. Essentially, the left meter represents a VU and the Right side a PPM meter that represented the peak voltage levels of the console. I would not use either of them for calibrating your audio signal unless you are familiar with them. My best advice is calibrate the waveform audio to an average level of -18 as long as peaks go no higher than -6 using a meter on the first insert slot. As long as you maintain unity gain through each plugin, your analog emulations will work at their optimum. Hope this helps... Mike
Hi Mike, your videos are an absolute gold mine, so thank you for doing this. I wanted to know your take on the VU meters issue, which has been reported by some users of the Bx_Console series. They are saying that the metering is broken on these plugins. Indeed the readings don't match other VU meters in my tests. Is it a bug or just something we don't know about the way these meters function?
This 4000 is a very strange plugin, the input level to the compressor is somewhat low so it does not react properly unless the input is 6db higher. Also the saturation works only if the EQ is turned on, which is strange as the THD is located in the preamp section. They say it uses some automatic oversampling spanning fro 2x to 4x so it does introduce aliasing however not audible most of the time. And finally E and G compressors work exactly the same, Plugin Doctor does not show any difference other than few db louder harmonics, which is inaudible really.
@@lucaszecat I do not think I have one really. I get similar results with all of them, or with using separate plugins so I use what i like at that particular moment. But now I really like the Analog Obsession CHANNEV for vocals, incredible saturation and de-esser, the best thing about it is that it is free and very honest in what it is and how it works compared to this expensive and gimmicky TMT nonsense.
Hi Mike, thank you for doing this. In your 'null' comparison the comp release settings are not the same, the comp release on the bx_console E is at -4 and fully left on the SSL 4000 E
Nice catch!v That explains the comment I made that the compressor was different. There is still a low level sound that exhibits the differences. Point being, it's not an exact copy of the prior version. Multiply this by 40 instantiations and the difference gets bigger. Cheers! Mike
By default no. But that is more about conserving processing power than the sound. If I need to EQ or compress, then the channelstrip is a good option on the return
A little late, but for anyone that comes after me, I spent a lot of time doing stuff on a $400 HP laptop and never had any problems with the channel strips (please be aware that I only ever ran the Focusrite and Lindel 80 console on it). Turning off the TMT helps with the processing too.
hey mike, brainworx has a good sale right now(99$ g and n channels) ...i can deside between the two and i own ssl waves bundle, what would be your pick? thank you and have a great happy new year
Thanks for this, Michael. Wow, quite a difference between those channels. When you hit the G channel, man it suddenly made the song sound so much like the mid-late 90s alt rock stuff on the radio of my childhood. Cool stuff! Since I have console 1's SSL which sounds more like the E(I think it's the E they modeled) I would probably go G. Sounds great. Do you put the Bworx new E above the latest UAD strip? I do love the tone of the UAD strip... though TMT looks awesome.
I get that it stands up with the best, but he more explicitly states the G is hands down the best(due in part to less competition) but I was curious among the more flooded E series market where the new SSL E Bwx ranked in his mind. He did say stands with the best which you are stating is UAD, however he himself didn't say UAD. He did say it probably stands at the top of the list, due in part to the TMT tech. I know these things are vague and can't really be quantified but I was hoping for a little more clarification since he has so much experience with all the plugs as well as years on the hardware. However these videos are not comparisons really, so I can understand why he doesn't want to go into comparisons to other plugins. At the same time, I can't help but wonder these comparisons as a potential buyer in a market with many choices. Guess I just need to demo the Bwx.
Perfect, exactly what I was trying to demonstrate! Console 1 is E emulation so getting the G would be a good compliment. I also like the UAD E channelstrip but the TMT makes this a better choice. Also, the full UAD E channelstrip is real CPU hog on the UA processors.
Great info! Thanks so much! Thanks for taking me back to my youth, too :-) TMT sounds like a winner. UAD really limits their plugs with the resources! Happy mixing and keep up the vids please, we so enjoy them!
No, it is an auto makeup gain circuit. This is true to the original. the fader is helpful for balancing out overall gain differential for all processing.
Hi, thanks for the great review. Do you have a preference between ssl e/g between waves and brainworx? And, does the E version include the G version, or do we need to buy each separately?
From waves they just have a channel strip and Brainworx has the representation of an actual console. With gain knobs for input and output. But I like waves if I just need a quick eq and compression to see how it would be then when I actually mix stuff I use the console if I can’t get what I want from the E channel strip
Oh man I was waiting for this video. Mike, if you could answer this I would be forever grateful. What is the software you use to capture audio a screen? I see you're using Quick Time, but for the audio I'm curious. I always get problems when doing this kinda videos, so far my best setup was with Audio Hijack but I still think is kinda messy, anyway, thank you!
Thanks Diego! QuickTime is what I use but you need to route the audio into a second interface to mix it with the mic. I use the Apollo Console app to mix Mic and ProTools and feed it to the SPDIF output going into a second interface that I use for the video. Hope this helps
Michael White that helps a lot thank you very MUCH, I'm also using the Apollo. BTW just finished the video and it was precious as usual Mike. Thank you for the information and care!
Thanks for this review Mike! In your opignon, did they really nail the compressor on these emulations or do the compressors miss a certain "punch" and "livelynes" when you compare to the SSL desk ?? Especially on drums... You have worked on real SSL desks and I am curious how you rate this ?
Are the different flavours of EQ's on the plugin only affected by the bands where the colour changes or is it affecting all the bands? This looks awesome!
I know you don't like comparing plugins, but what's the CPU hit like compared to something like the Scheps OmniChannel because I need some sort of reference point because I know we have different machines. Thanks in advance!
I think this is more efficient overall than the Omni Channel but it depends how much of the OC you use. You can right-click and disable modules that are not in use. If you use every module in the OC ot will take more CPU.
Alright thank you, I tend to use the EQ, COMP, and PRE for most of my work. These looks like a feature rich SSL, so I didn't want to move a more taxing channel strip.
Hey Mike, I'm a bit confused about the attack switch. You said it switches between slow and fast but the manual says that it switches from "auto" to fast.
Yes, very different. The original mix buss compressor is a 4 channel (quad) VCA compressor. The fixed ratios have different knee characteristics and the Attack and Release settings are fixed settings instead of variable. Additionally, the Auto release setting is multistage unlike anything on the channel. Hope this helps...
@@mixingwithmike I was referring to the "V Gain ALL" in the top menu and to the right of RESET. It goes to -30 or +20. But I figured out what happened. LOL From the factory setting, turn the expand/gate range knob (left) and you will hear the hiss come up. If the hi-shelf is also boosted you can hear it even more. Turning down the "V Gain ALL" in the top menu drops the hiss or airy sound. Thanks again Mike.
Hi Pablo, If you're talking about the vocals in the mix, I don't know. None of the demonstration materials I use are my recordings. If you're talking about my mic, it's a SM7B
How about you be happy he took the time to make an intelligent and informative demo of this product instead of complaining. Why do you even take the time to expel your negativity here and why, as the viewer do you get to be so demanding? What are you contributing?
One heck of a review from someone who knows what he's talking about.
Well done, Sir - keep 'em coming!
Cheers!
I think the TMT technology, when using these console plugins on every mix channel, definitely makes THE difference. Just running audio through them without touching a knob does “something” I like in comparison to anything else in my arsenal of plugins. I love what they do so much, I bought them ALL (as in all of them, including Lindell 80, 50 series, console N, Focusrite SC, Amek 9099). And I use them all. As in, all SSL 4000 Es in this session, and all 80s series in that session.
Incorporating the limitations mix engineers had in strictly using analog gear with these console plugins has aided tremendously in getting the results I want. Of course there’s been console plugins before these. However, I’ve never thought to use them on every channel before TMT.
And I’m just realizing this video is 4 yrs old, so I feel like I’ve been living under a rock this entire time in thinking this tech was new.
Whoah!!! That G series sounds amazing!!! I actually like it two fold over the E series on the mix! It has more separation and it doesn’t hurt as much….it actually feels like it smoother
this TMT simply removes the maskings in my mix, now i'm revisiting my old stuffs . thanks for this superb lessons !
I think it’s worth mentioning that with the E (the one I bought), you only get THD when the EQ or compressor is active.
With the EQ engaged you get odd harmonics, the level of which can be adjusted by the THD knob.
With the compressor engaged you get mostly second harmonic which ISN’T affected by the THD knob.
If neither is active there are no harmonics generated.
Makes sense, that it would generate harmonics from the sound being modified by the strip, considering it's not a saturator.
Thanks that is good to know 🙂
Simply the best and only BX_SSL E vs D comparison attempt and walk-through tutorial out there, in thy virtual mundo : like an impossible crosstalk of Mr. Robinson vs Mr. Roger's neighborhoodS 🖖
Man, I am totally loving your reviews man! Quality reviews from someone who is actually knowledgeable.
Honestly the part around 2-3 minutes in where you talked about the numbering convention blew my mind 🤯 I never thought about that before! All those amazing albums and they had 4 or 6 stereo busses, while we can use that many on percussion now 😂
Just grabbed E and G for $49 each.
Glad i waited.
Excellent video. Thanks!
same!
I got myself the E-channel. I make electronic music but I wanted some analoque warmth in my music. I like what I've heard so far and it's been a while since I've been so excited about a plugin. Great and informative video!
Cheers!
Another excellent review, thanks Mike! I have the 4000 E and G, and Lindell 80. Hoping to compare all soon.
Excellent review. I think it is the best review on youtube for these plugins. Plugin-Alliance should load this video on their website!
Btw I do have them all and like the 4000 E black knob the most. I sound wide and big even with all knobs on zero, and the channels 5 and 6 (in analog mode - stereo) sounds fenomenal.
Thx Mike.
Haha. Dont over judge
Just Got These A Week Ago Love Them
for all that are wondering the v gain knob is console noise mike missed that bit,very good review btw
Thanks Pat!
Thanks for the video Michael. Much appreciated, I just bought the SSL E-Channel from Waves for $29 bucks, and I am installing it as I type this message. From what I see with the TMT and the BX console, it seems this is a beast. I'm hoping that I will be ok with the SSL I just bought from Waves. I've seen the Waves SSL for years and it seems like this is the move they should of made in upgrading their SSL E and G channels. But maybe down the line I might buy this, $299 is where it's at now. Whew! Dam BX SSL E channel is a dam BEAST!
The SSL E-Channel is still quite good. Especially considering it was release some 10 years ago or so. Keep you eyes on sales for this one, it is definitely worth it.
this week - 49$ (and 29$ with the voucher every registred costumer get) for the bx_console SSL G via PluginAlliance
Hi Mike - This is great - glad to have found you here!
Cheers! Thanks for dropping a note! Hope all is well...
@@mixingwithmike Yup - retired from "The Firm" for 2 years now and really enjoying your posts
@@donwershba2319 Love it! Cheers!
The E sounds more open and the G sounds more tighter/pulled in
This is true of the original consoles as well
exactly the information i needed.
probably hitting up a manual wouldnt cost me 27minutes
something to consider in the future
Great, just got the bx 4000 E in a sale, sounds amazing straight off
It's a great buy and an invaluable tool for me
Yeah same. Everyone goes for the E it seems.
This channel is amazing. Thanks for the demo.
Cheers!
In G you said the EQ has pultec style. Confirm purchase G tomorrow. Thnks
Yes, the filter shapes are modeled after the Pultec EQ. That does not mean it sounds like a Pultec.
great review! now i understand this thing so much more!
How do you feel this compares to the SSL Native plugin?
Thanks Mike!
Cheers Dirk!
Fantastic review as usual. Thanx
Cheers!
Just a great video.. thank you so much for this.
17:12 - SSL E
22:23 - SSL G
When you do the null test the release times are not set equally on both plugins which could explain the compression differences we hear, right?
Where is the documentation that explains the signal flow ?
Michael White Where is the documentation that explains the signal flow ?
Thanks for the Overview of the BX SSL 4000. Was really researching a new all around plugin to run with. This helped a lot. How do you feel it works on vocals. I primarly work on HipHop and Pop music. I've noticed the effects that it has on more natural tones of music. How about over processed sounds?
Hi mike, great vid as always. Is there any need for console emulations like NLS ,VCC etc when using these? Cheers
I have a ton of PA plugins but must say....these really should have been offered in one plugin (both console types). If both types were feasible to offer in the dynamics sections, then it should be practical within the filter section as well.
Hi Mike, I definitely decided for the Brainworx Focusrite CS console, would you say the SSL E is a good addition for that? Or more the SSL G? Thank you.
MIKE BIG QUESTION, I NOTICE IT DONT HAVE A STEREO SPREAD ON IT, SO IS IT OKAY FOR ME TO USE A STEREO SPREAD WITH IT
Hey Mike, could you please explain, in layman's terms, how to use metering in these BX SSL channel strips? It's not explained in the manual where the "sweet spot" is for these plugins, I don't know much to drive the input to get the right amount of the signal for the best performance. Usually I calibrate my VU meters around -18 dbfs RMS, but I don't understand how to use these SSL VU & dBu meters properly without having to refer to external meters.
Hi D S,
Sorry I missed what should have been something obvious to cover. In a nutshell, these meters emulate the plasma meters that were designed for the SSL consoles back then. They are not digital meters in the same way that you would use a dBFS meter in your DAW.
Essentially, the left meter represents a VU and the Right side a PPM meter that represented the peak voltage levels of the console. I would not use either of them for calibrating your audio signal unless you are familiar with them.
My best advice is calibrate the waveform audio to an average level of -18 as long as peaks go no higher than -6 using a meter on the first insert slot. As long as you maintain unity gain through each plugin, your analog emulations will work at their optimum.
Hope this helps...
Mike
Damn excellent 👍
Hi Mike, your videos are an absolute gold mine, so thank you for doing this. I wanted to know your take on the VU meters issue, which has been reported by some users of the Bx_Console series. They are saying that the metering is broken on these plugins. Indeed the readings don't match other VU meters in my tests. Is it a bug or just something we don't know about the way these meters function?
This 4000 is a very strange plugin, the input level to the compressor is somewhat low so it does not react properly unless the input is 6db higher. Also the saturation works only if the EQ is turned on, which is strange as the THD is located in the preamp section. They say it uses some automatic oversampling spanning fro 2x to 4x so it does introduce aliasing however not audible most of the time. And finally E and G compressors work exactly the same, Plugin Doctor does not show any difference other than few db louder harmonics, which is inaudible really.
What's your go to channel strip ?
@@lucaszecat I do not think I have one really. I get similar results with all of them, or with using separate plugins so I use what i like at that particular moment. But now I really like the Analog Obsession CHANNEV for vocals, incredible saturation and de-esser, the best thing about it is that it is free and very honest in what it is and how it works compared to this expensive and gimmicky TMT nonsense.
Hi Mike, thank you for doing this. In your 'null' comparison the comp release settings are not the same, the comp release on the bx_console E is at -4 and fully left on the SSL 4000 E
Nice catch!v That explains the comment I made that the compressor was different. There is still a low level sound that exhibits the differences. Point being, it's not an exact copy of the prior version. Multiply this by 40 instantiations and the difference gets bigger.
Cheers!
Mike
I remarked the same and looked in comments in case somebody saw it too ;) !
This lacks any preamp emulation correct?
Love your reviews brother! Quick one, do you also add a channel strip on reverb /delay send tracks as well? Thanks!
By default no. But that is more about conserving processing power than the sound. If I need to EQ or compress, then the channelstrip is a good option on the return
@@mixingwithmike ah thanks! Good to know!
Can anyone speak to the kind of processing hit the BX SSL channel strip plugins create in a mix?
A little late, but for anyone that comes after me, I spent a lot of time doing stuff on a $400 HP laptop and never had any problems with the channel strips (please be aware that I only ever ran the Focusrite and Lindel 80 console on it). Turning off the TMT helps with the processing too.
hey mike, brainworx has a good sale right now(99$ g and n channels) ...i can deside between the two and i own ssl waves bundle, what would be your pick? thank you and have a great happy new year
Great!!!
Great video.
Thanks!
Thanks for this, Michael. Wow, quite a difference between those channels. When you hit the G channel, man it suddenly made the song sound so much like the mid-late 90s alt rock stuff on the radio of my childhood. Cool stuff! Since I have console 1's SSL which sounds more like the E(I think it's the E they modeled) I would probably go G. Sounds great. Do you put the Bworx new E above the latest UAD strip? I do love the tone of the UAD strip... though TMT looks awesome.
Achase4u yea at the end he says it is the best it stands up with the best(uad)
I get that it stands up with the best, but he more explicitly states the G is hands down the best(due in part to less competition) but I was curious among the more flooded E series market where the new SSL E Bwx ranked in his mind. He did say stands with the best which you are stating is UAD, however he himself didn't say UAD. He did say it probably stands at the top of the list, due in part to the TMT tech. I know these things are vague and can't really be quantified but I was hoping for a little more clarification since he has so much experience with all the plugs as well as years on the hardware. However these videos are not comparisons really, so I can understand why he doesn't want to go into comparisons to other plugins. At the same time, I can't help but wonder these comparisons as a potential buyer in a market with many choices. Guess I just need to demo the Bwx.
Perfect, exactly what I was trying to demonstrate! Console 1 is E emulation so getting the G would be a good compliment. I also like the UAD E channelstrip but the TMT makes this a better choice. Also, the full UAD E channelstrip is real CPU hog on the UA processors.
Great info! Thanks so much! Thanks for taking me back to my youth, too :-) TMT sounds like a winner. UAD really limits their plugs with the resources! Happy mixing and keep up the vids please, we so enjoy them!
Hi, for the compressor, is there a makeup gain?
No, it is an auto makeup gain circuit. This is true to the original. the fader is helpful for balancing out overall gain differential for all processing.
Cool, thank you!
Hi, thanks for the great review. Do you have a preference between ssl e/g between waves and brainworx? And, does the E version include the G version, or do we need to buy each separately?
Both have the E/G switch, but are separate products, so i'm lost too.
From waves they just have a channel strip and Brainworx has the representation of an actual console. With gain knobs for input and output. But I like waves if I just need a quick eq and compression to see how it would be then when I actually mix stuff I use the console if I can’t get what I want from the E channel strip
Oh man I was waiting for this video. Mike, if you could answer this I would be forever grateful. What is the software you use to capture audio a screen? I see you're using Quick Time, but for the audio I'm curious. I always get problems when doing this kinda videos, so far my best setup was with Audio Hijack but I still think is kinda messy, anyway, thank you!
Thanks Diego!
QuickTime is what I use but you need to route the audio into a second interface to mix it with the mic. I use the Apollo Console app to mix Mic and ProTools and feed it to the SPDIF output going into a second interface that I use for the video. Hope this helps
Michael White that helps a lot thank you very MUCH, I'm also using the Apollo. BTW just finished the video and it was precious as usual Mike. Thank you for the information and care!
@@mixingwithmike that's so cumbersome. You should definitely try out Screenflow
Thanks for this review Mike! In your opignon, did they really nail the compressor on these emulations or do the compressors miss a certain "punch" and "livelynes" when you compare to the SSL desk ?? Especially on drums... You have worked on real SSL desks and I am curious how you rate this ?
Just drive it harder and don't be afraid to crank that THD all the way up!) It somehow calibrated not like other SSL plugins
Are the different flavours of EQ's on the plugin only affected by the bands where the colour changes or is it affecting all the bands? This looks awesome!
It affects all the bands not just the knobs that change colors. I think most of the differences are in the shape of boost-attenuation curves.
And according to the BxC_4kE series manual, it affects the filters as well.
Is this only for the Master bus?
No, these are for individual tracks
Michael White so would you need to open a bunch of the same plugin then for individual tracks?
I know you don't like comparing plugins, but what's the CPU hit like compared to something like the Scheps OmniChannel because I need some sort of reference point because I know we have different machines. Thanks in advance!
I think this is more efficient overall than the Omni Channel but it depends how much of the OC you use. You can right-click and disable modules that are not in use. If you use every module in the OC ot will take more CPU.
Alright thank you, I tend to use the EQ, COMP, and PRE for most of my work. These looks like a feature rich SSL, so I didn't want to move a more taxing channel strip.
Hey Mike, I'm a bit confused about the attack switch. You said it switches between slow and fast but the manual says that it switches from "auto" to fast.
Yes, fast attack is about 3ms and the "Slow" attack is auto sensing between 3-30ms
@@mixingwithmike Thank you so much for clarifying, you are the best!!
Hi, is there a difference between the compressor in this SSL G and the Waves standalone SSG Bus Compressor?
Yes, very different. The original mix buss compressor is a 4 channel (quad) VCA compressor. The fixed ratios have different knee characteristics and the Attack and Release settings are fixed settings instead of variable. Additionally, the Auto release setting is multistage unlike anything on the channel.
Hope this helps...
Michael White thanks
ur a wiz bro
Cheers!
Do you get any hiss noise when you enable the compressor?
Hmmm... Not getting that on my end.
@@mixingwithmike It was the first time I heard it as well. I ended up turning down the "V Gain ALL" to -30db. Did they trick! Thanks
@@Doctaj54 The V Gain goes to "Off" are you talking about the THD? -30 would add more noise
@@mixingwithmike I was referring to the "V Gain ALL" in the top menu and to the right of RESET. It goes to -30 or +20. But I figured out what happened. LOL
From the factory setting, turn the expand/gate range knob (left) and you will hear the hiss come up. If the hi-shelf is also boosted you can hear it even more. Turning down the "V Gain ALL" in the top menu drops the hiss or airy sound. Thanks again Mike.
@@Doctaj54 Thanks make sense
The G series sounds like Guns'N'Roses in "Appetite for Destruction".
Strangely true...
Mike. I love your content here on YT, but ... what mic do you use to achieve such bad voice sound? Give us some datails please!
Hi Pablo, If you're talking about the vocals in the mix, I don't know. None of the demonstration materials I use are my recordings. If you're talking about my mic, it's a SM7B
Sounds great to me...check your cans.
why you cant eq your voice, its too BOXY
Thanks for nothing :o)
My God. You. Talk. Too. Much...
How about you be happy he took the time to make an intelligent and informative demo of this product instead of complaining. Why do you even take the time to expel your negativity here and why, as the viewer do you get to be so demanding? What are you contributing?
Check your punctuation.
R U freakin' kidding!!
You complain too much. This was an excellent review. Go back to fruity loops and torrents.
Pft