Thank you for reviewing my game :) You're right it was an 'odd' game.. I didn't know what to do. I like that you don't just nitpick but provide overall strategy. Having scouts with the raiders is something I don't do but makes sense. It's crazy he had all these vills exposed but I wasn't finding them. You're right to watch to 25min in the game which is when I should've won. It became one of these super extended siege battles but that is probably all irrelevant when I should've won already with a couple of key decisions. I didn't realise my army was that much bigger as well. I do have a question. You said I 'should've killed him early' but you're not saying attack into his base where his keeps are? You're just saying by being more aware of the map, scouting and raiding vills he would've tapped out and had no money
Man, i didnt see one single archer from him.. in this case, you should make just spears and go in front of his base, an produce like 6 rams.. and thats it.. you should win in 17min.
Hey There Swish, "You said I 'should've killed him early' but you're not saying attack into his base where his keeps are? You're just saying by being more aware of the map, scouting and raiding vills he would've tapped out and had no money" Yes. Multiple ways to "kill" an opponent. The first is obvious, if you have scouted him and are certain in how much bigger your military is, you can go rams and take down his base / landmarks. However, you don't have to do this. By the time he had the keeps up in his main base, it would have been easier to steal map control, by scouting and attacking his resource deposits outside the base. He wouldn't have been able to get gold. He would have at a minimum, had to go into farms for food, which would be an investment. You probably could have "starved him out" before he ever got that mass of knights
Thank you for reviewing my game :)
You're right it was an 'odd' game.. I didn't know what to do. I like that you don't just nitpick but provide overall strategy.
Having scouts with the raiders is something I don't do but makes sense. It's crazy he had all these vills exposed but I wasn't finding them.
You're right to watch to 25min in the game which is when I should've won. It became one of these super extended siege battles but that is probably all irrelevant when I should've won already with a couple of key decisions. I didn't realise my army was that much bigger as well.
I do have a question. You said I 'should've killed him early' but you're not saying attack into his base where his keeps are? You're just saying by being more aware of the map, scouting and raiding vills he would've tapped out and had no money
Man, i didnt see one single archer from him..
in this case, you should make just spears and go in front of his base, an produce like 6 rams.. and thats it.. you should win in 17min.
Another advice, if you dont want to wall your base, you should let at least 10 spears on your woods and food far from TC.
Hey There Swish,
"You said I 'should've killed him early' but you're not saying attack into his base where his keeps are? You're just saying by being more aware of the map, scouting and raiding vills he would've tapped out and had no money"
Yes. Multiple ways to "kill" an opponent. The first is obvious, if you have scouted him and are certain in how much bigger your military is, you can go rams and take down his base / landmarks.
However, you don't have to do this. By the time he had the keeps up in his main base, it would have been easier to steal map control, by scouting and attacking his resource deposits outside the base. He wouldn't have been able to get gold. He would have at a minimum, had to go into farms for food, which would be an investment. You probably could have "starved him out" before he ever got that mass of knights
@@clumsygoldfish Thank you :)
@@diogovieira7900 The raids were super annoying, thanks for the tips!