'Fabricated evidence' saved OJ Simpson from jail | OJ's Lawyer Alan Dershowitz
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 май 2024
- “There was no escaping the scientific evidence that the sock had been framed and planted against him.”
OJ Simpson would have been found guilty if the Los Angeles police did not plant evidence against him, says his former lawyer Alan Dershowitz.
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...
![Chance The Rapper, DJ Premier - Together (2024) | [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZVwTX6WP-MM/mqdefault.jpg)
Who was Ron Goldman punching to bust his knuckles up so much? OJ had no marks on him.
The drug dealer who came to collect debt from Nicole
@@michaelprince3486 Tell me more!
I believe the Glen rogers theory.
@@michaelprince3486 No one will ever believe your lies that drug dealers are the ones responsible
@@michaelprince3486 HAHAHAHA! That's a good one.
None of the critics ever talk about the planted evidence. I wonder why.
Because the most important thing was he was guilty. Yes they should have been prosecuted for planting evidence but two wrongs do not make a right.
@@user-bu9nb8wr6e he was guilty based on planted evidence?
Because it doesn't exist. There was no planted evidence. This is what Trump does. Keeps saying a thing over and over until it becomes true.
@user-bu9nb8wr6If they had enough evidence to prove guilty they would have never risked planting evidence. OJ is innocent
@@user-bu9nb8wr6ehow was he guilty? They literally never proved it and cops on the scene were proved to plant evidence?
The police stupidly helped the dream team.
The jury's stupidity helped the dream team.
@@asmith8947 the police was tampering with evidence, what do you expect them to do? sort through other evidence and pretend it wasn't also tampered with?
@@butmunchass been drinking Cochran's Kool Aid have you?
Rodney King saved OJ.
@@asmith8947@asmith8947 Nope, it was the police who planted a bloody sock, according to Dershowitz.
Alan Dershowitz need to come clean on his Jeffrey Epstien Deal.
You mean the "deal" where Epstein hired him to be his lawyer?
They need to investigate him!!
They only started making accusations against him when he, as a democrat started declaring how Trumps constitutional rights were and still are being violated. Even now today as he points out how Biden is breaking laws daily, he still makes a point to say he will never vote for Trump
@TT-bn3db
His accuser cleared him.
@@omegaz3393- Power and influence corrupts...especially when you're of a particular persuasion and have foreign Intelligence assets that can eliminate any problem
Police plant evidence on innocent victims too. This practice is often overlooked by the public.
When is that ever overlooked by the general public?
The police are very corrupt, so r many politicians
The general public are very rarely aware of any planting of evidence. It's not as if the Police announce it to the world
@@marmac83 when it doesn’t affect their family
OJ was innocent
Thats the essence of this case. The jury rejected the charge because of tainted evidence which meant they could not rule him guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. And that's a fair result. The LAPD is the reason that OJ Simpson got off.
the police messed up the crime scene!! they wanted and did framed OJ but look what God did turned it around!!
Facts .
@@LLace tainted evidence. FACT
Its about reasonable doubt. If yer system wasnt so obviously racist this wouldnt be an issue. You want justice? Clean up yer racist system. You only upset cos you didnt get justice for a white victim....
Evidence was not tainted though. Alan Dershovitz is treating a highly contested point (including at trial) as proven and making it the entire discussion. On the face of it planting evidence is implausible considering logistics. Vannater, who knew little about blood and DNA, framed OJ for some unknown purpose when there was already overwhelming evidence of guilt?
For God's sake give it up, Dershowitz. Your client is dead, you can now admit he did it.
You exhibit your absurrd ignorance. NO attorneys are NEVER allowed to break attorney-client privilege and iif you weren't IGNORANT you would know that.
@@asmith8947 Lol...what an absurd comment. I am NOT ignorant. I know that case inside out. You have NO IDEA what is lawyers knew or didn't know. (You probablly have no clue what "projectioni" is.). You have never met or talked to any of hiis lawyers. The evidence wsa a hodge podge. I think more in an hour than you have thought your whole life.
My lawyer friend told me to never trust a lawyer 😂
I think just because leather shrinks when wet (and then dries) is what saved him with the glove.. just like muddy footprints can shrink as they dry...
Jury was looking for payback for Rodney King! They could have a video of the killing with OJ & a dripping knife! They still would have found him not guilty!
He probably also swelled up his hands the night before
@@BringingTheHeat-VBC Story the gloves were shrunk - put in water as well. Any truth in that? Perhaps you don't know. I would have thought if the gloves fitted, he was guilty. I note you say they did.
That was the stupidest thing a prosecutor ever did. OJ ACTED like they didn't fit. If you don't want to put leather gloves on, it's easy, just wiggle around, spread your fingers and act like you can't get them on. EVERYBODY knew he was guilty. I seriously don't know why so many black citizens celebrated. It definitely wasn't because they thought he didn't do it, but I guess they had their reasons. P.S. Alan Dershowitz has been a disgusting excuse for a man his entire life.
The gloves weren’t key. It was planted evidence and mark fuhrman pleaded the 5th.
This is the best interview I have ever heard Dershowitz give.
They tried to frame a guilty man and it set him free.
The defence team might have planted the evidence. All they had to do was prove there was planted evidence, not by who, and they won the case just like that; how easy! Any idiot could have defended Simpson and won that way!
Marcia Clark and Chris Darden were more concerned with f*cking than doing a competent job
A good interview. Very interesting.
He was as guilty as sin and a Banana Republic justice system let him off.
Welcome to the USA...
Police are corrupt
When the glove was found it should have been measured.
If it was the same size in court it didn't shrink. I don't know if this aspect was considered.
The prosecutors were incompetent, so were the detectives.
never buy a Zl0Nl$T lie. connect the dots, bro/sis.
The glove was handled badly.
i heard those were ron goldman's gloves!!
If u watch oj 25...he doses a demonstration with a brand new pair...but judge ito didnt let the jury see it. Cuz dardins blunder before hand. And it fit perfectly lol. But fuhrman definately took thst glove over to rockingham
It is known that the glove was a 1xl while his hand was a 2xl.
Totally...He was framed...Guilty people can be framed....And with great lawyers that creates reasonable doubt.
I did not know about the sock. Based on that I will reverse all of the swearing I did at the jury at the time they acquitted him. It is a shame that the police sometimes do this to secure a conviction and as a result an obviously guilty man walks free.
“Obviously guilty” while also literally acknowledging that the evidence was planted
@@chesssterling101 every black man is "obviously guilty"
I just watched a recent interview with a few jurors. One of them bragged about how "90% of us" gave a not guilty verdict as revenge for Rodney King.
What baffles me is where did Ron's girlfriends car go? He had borrowed it to drop off the glasses on his way out. He was meeting up with friends later. Did someone give him a lift and then dissapear. There has never been a mention of what happened to the car or possible driver since that night!
Interesting, he was dropped off for a fling
He lived less then 10 minutes away. He walked over there
@@ChrisFike2940 oh yea, he was going to hit.
He died surrounded by his children and grandchildren…not too close mind. Just far enough back so the knife couldn’t reach them.
He was clearly ego driven, and it's possible that he killed his 2nd wife, although I could be wrong. You never know. Innocent people do appear guilty, especially when accused. Perhaps I need to take a closer look. But, a woman must respect boundaries. If she behaved herself she'd be alive today, outliving him to tell her tale of victimhood. Instead, she listened to so-called friends who encouraged her to get her "freedom," (to take half and escape) and she definitely got that freedom. It could be the tragedy of a man wanting more (he already had a wife and kids), and a woman raised with a liberal mentality, naïve to the severity of jealousy. Granted that he cheated on her, no doubt, if she could have maintained her integrity, no trigger could exist to push him across the line. Parents play a role too. Some of the white community can be very irresponsible, especially where financial opportunity beckons, or when it comes to sexual morality, and pass that on to their children who then go out into the world believing their behaviour is safe and normal. If the father really cared about his daughter he would have forbidden the union. Moral of this story is basically, stick to your own kind. I'm not saying this sort of match cannot work. Exceptions always exist, especially in more civilized nations like Britain, but really, it's better to be with someone who has the same outlook.
I think he has another daughter who looks very much like Sidney, Khloe Kardashian ! She never wanted to do a DNA test.
@@sueu6263 I didn't realize how good Kim looked back then until I watched a documentary yesterday. It's a terrible shame that people have to get older.
@@artstation707 Exactly! You nailed it.
@artstation707 I can agree with some things that you’ve said, but your comments across RUclips are questionable. You definitely have a strange agenda.
I think the jury saved him from jail.
The jury awarded him two free murders because he was black. Simple as that.
Mark Fuhrman saved him
great justice system we have in this country RIP OJ Simpson
RIP JOHNNIE COCHRAN
Allen Dershowitz is full of it.
FULL!!!
You probably only say that because he has defended President Trump.
So are you.
So the police tried to set him up lol and failed.
They played themselves.
Putin was involved.
RU farm troll and clown, you are so pathetic…..
LOL...good one.
Or Frank Vogel, or Darvin Ham.
Pray 4 world peace & god will send great leaders. It doesnt matter if ur muslim Christian Hindu or Sikh. Just pray
Amon!🤎!
What's this got to do with anything?
we only pray to God the God if Abraham, Issac and Jacob!! no one else!!
@@Bluelollipop384 Who do you mean by "we"?
what i mean... WE me and my family and born again followers of Jesus Christ!!
OJ killed his wife and visitor that day. The media should not have made such a big deal about his passing.
You don't know that....police planted evidence . That's bad..
Yeah rons goldmans was a coke head who two co workers were murdered a similar way around the same time.. guess OJ killed them as well
He wrote a book about killing the two.....
@@frankrizzo454 he was paid one million to co create a book he didnt write it did he did that for money
@@frankrizzo454Everyone was able to write the book. It was all well known.
He said van atter poured blood on a sock...WHY wasn't that criminal behavior?
It is.
Yet nothing happened all of those years ago.
what was vannater doing with ron nicole and oj blood? carrying it around for 3 hours and taking OJ shoes at home??? vanneter got the blood from the crime lab... he had no business getting OJ blood and sprinkling them at bundy and rockingham.. I hope and prayed that vanatter got right with God and repented what he did to OJ which is to frame in innocent man!!
it didn't happen. According to forensics the blood was projected on (as per a wound splatter) and was not poured on.
Cause it was a lie
He was so guilty. lol
Police interference...
Al, what about the suicide note. Is that normal behavior for an innocent person?
Hmm.
Yes
Allen dershowitz needs to give this up,his debate that he had with Vince bugliosi (that you can all hear on larry king liv)vince bugliosi (who f.lee bailey said was the quintessential prosecutor)addresses this issue,the expert ,dr marks,who was the only one who actually conducted the test,said the edta that was found wasn't enough to suggest he had been framed,the other defense expert dr. Riders who said differently, never conducted his own test..you can hear this debate on larry king live,where allen dershowitz keeps interrupting bugliosi and won't let him finish..
Allen dershowitz then says about how dr marks shouldn't be believed, because this reason and that reason,then bugliosi says now he's part of this conspiracy!....so Allen dershowitz is spreading mistruths,but what do you expect from a defense attorney...
He was acquitted because most of the jury was black.
I agree that is one point of view. I think it was payback for the beating of Rodney King. We can’t ignore the fact that the police fabricated evidence and that also contributed to his acquittal. Ultimately, his got is comeuppance although he got partial freedom.
And a majority white jury would have found him guilty? What does that say??
@@therobertspot4840why waste time with those lunatics, they ain’t gonna change!
Exactly pay back for Rodney king but The truck driver they beat half to death just cause he was white never mention
You think they cared about two white people? Not hardly.
With all the evidence - he planted
EDTA is used extensively in the fabric industry. There was a good chance it was there blood spattering or not.
The Akita went into a rage and pulled a Swiss army 🗡️ .
Loved this interview had to listen twice
Are you sure that he killed her?
oh he just took a guilty stroll with the whole police force behind him cause he was innocent. lol
@@DannyTubiolohe was innocent, you don’t plant evidence on a guilty man.
@@christopherm202dcfinest2 the trial & investigation turned into a joke, they should have stepped back & do a tightly knit investigation along with camera's barred from the courtroom. whole thing turned into a clusterfk - and because of that, the defense used that drama to get a not guilty
@@DannyTubiolo I don’t believe my people have special powers but apparently everyone else does. A 46 year old man with bad knees and arthritis can’t take out two young able bodied people and not have bruises on him in a 25 min span.
I was in my Spanish lawyer's office and he got a phone call from someone wanting him to defend a young immigrant. I left the office but it was quiet and i heard him saying he didn't want to defend the man from rapung a young women. Of course we all have a choice who we sell our talents too.
A lawyer i know of had a paedo walk in wanting legal representation and was shown the door
The day everyone become blind will be the end of racial and racism.
Do i think he did it? Most probably but once the police started messing with evidence then they had no choice but to find him not guilty. Had they have left it alone he would probably have been in jail. Everyone should get a fair trial and yes i watch the whole thing on live TV.
He is now being judged by God and he knows the truth.
Yes God knows he did it and all the evidence pointed to that.
Dershowitz is bullshitting to this day about it.
The old man in the sky with a beard and toga..that God?
@@jim-oq9px, no, the black guy with the deep voice!😁
@@leeeastwood6368 Louis Armstrong Wonderful World?
@@jim-oq9px, Morgan Freeman!🤣🤣
Dershowitch decided he was not guilty when he became his lawyer is the simple answer
How do you sleep at night?
My cousin was Johnny C. secretary and during the trial, Johnny C. team drove from the crime scene to the airport many times, taking different routes (shortcuts) and after doing so, they said there was NO WAY OJ could have drove from the crime scene to the airport and catch that flight on time. My cousin the secretary is now retired and til this day she stands firm on OJ's innocence. I find it fascinating and hope that the people responsible pay for their actions. RIP to all those affected by this.
How do you almost decapitate 2 people and not be coverd in blood?
No way he could have known Goldman would be present and proceed anyway?
If he didn't do it himself, he paid someone. I could be completely wrong. He could be completely innocent, but I happen to know that to trigger jealousy, people can do the most hurtful, unimaginable, and despicable things, especially women. A proud, conceited man, who believes he can get away with anything, would not be as forgiving as someone more rational. Still, I could be wrong. I wasn't there so only those who were, can know.
@artstation707 who would be so careful and dodge sprays of blood in a jealous rage?
@@rodhipps6378 A smarter woman. Don't underestimate people! Long suffering wives can be shrewd in their own best interests.
exactly!! ron and nicole had mulitple cuts and bruises. didnt people look at ron's hands? as OJ only had one cut on his finger. OJ should have been covered and drenched in blood like goldman and nicole they also checked his body he had no cuts and bruises whoever fought nicole and ron should have the same cuts and bruises as did ron and nicole!!
@artstation707 was him n his son
Love allan Dershowitz , this was right on.
He’s nuts. Guilty.
FREEEEEEEEE
Um, That's what he is saying.
There is some major revisionist history here.
Exactly. Fuhrmann was a clown and Ron and Nicole were druggies.
which part ?
Actual history not propaganda
A lost soul has descended into the eternal black abyss of shrieks, agony and horror for which he was destined
there's no frame-ups in the court of God.
Nailed it. If I were on the jury, I would have voted to acquit. But, Simpson did it.
That's easy to say..
You must never be on a jury if you are prepared to acquit a murderer.
@@_KEN_guru You must never be on a jury if you don't believe in the rule of law and don't believe that it must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, within the rules of the constitution.
The jurors saw the motive, evidence, heard witnesses etc. They knew that OJ Simpson was a murderer (that was later ruled by another court in a civil case). One piece of evidence that seemed falsified to them did not give them REASONABLE doubt. As responsible citizens, those jurors were obliged to condemn the murderer as guilty and report a minor crime by a policeman (or whoever they suspected of spraying blood on a sock). Those are two different crimes.
@@_KEN_guru The jury duty's responsibility is to be objective to both the prosecution and defense. If the prosecution doesn't prove the defendant being guilty, then the jury has to determine the accused as not guilty. Not guilty doesn't necessarily mean innocent. I certainly think OJ committed those crimes, and should've been punished.
OJ’s teams explained to the jurors how they could vote not guilty and sleep at nite ..
I don’t believe Alan “I kept my underwear on” Dershowitz.
The division is NOT b/c of social media.
You are correct. It has more to do with I.Q. levels.
I dont belive ha said that, he said it is a part of the division that it doesn't help.
An intelligent interviewer. Thank you.
how do people have an opinion on the case and then say things like, "I didn't know they fabricrated evidence." So we just don't read anything now?
Certainly no Speedracer. 😂
That evidence mixed with general angst from Rodney King.
Wasn't it Kim Kardashian father his lawyer???
Yes he was.
Yeah, and he left them a fortune, but they never mention that. They are all “self-made”.
Yes and he knew OJ did it because he understood the DNA results .
The jury had absolutely no understanding of what DNA results meant , the evidence went straight over their heads . DNA was a new thing back then .
Yeah but he distances himself away from Oj before he passed!! And in the barbara walters interview he said he believes oj killed Nicole
He had the best money could buy. Good ole American Dollars.
Once you think its the last door
You open it and you're surprised by 100 doors in your face
But i can't unsee the obvious evidence that point straight
To him
DAs could easily de-bunk "glove doesn't fit"theory by putting on a leather glove then trying it on with rubber glove under it.
It wasn't just the glove, the police planted the bloody sock, they played themselves.
Two names: Roy Bryant and JW Milan.
OJ wearing THE gloves on Dec. 15, 1990?
RUclips
He's lucky I wasn't the defense attorney.
EDTA is found household laundry detergents, not just test tubes. Shame the prosecutors back then didn't point this out
Except it was planted and the blood splatter showed sock was flat not worn when it got on it sherlock.
@@rodhipps6378they’ll be in denial because black guy was innocent and they cant comprehend that rom goldsman was a coke head who co workers also got murdered the same way around the same time.. i guess OJ killed them as well
@@rodhipps6378 nothing was planted holmes
@@denniswhite6013 Mark Ferman took the fifth when he was asked about planting evidence. Acquit.
@@leonardcollings7389 he had to or else he would have had to answer any and all other questions. you can't pick and choose. watch the civil trial, more evidence presented and less b.s. 12 outta 12 jurors found him guilty and the only reason he got off in first trial is the jurors said it was payback for rodney king. it's all over youtube, the interview
Too late now.
There was no EDTA. It's so much BS. The fact that Alan is still hung up on this is rather astounding
I said that BEFORE I read your note. But Fuhrman did commit perjury & took the 5TH while testifying.
@@bldr-es9vq Fuhrman is the epitome of disgrace
So you’re saying this lawyer is lying? Y’all will say anything on here. 😂😂😂
@@kilduce4423 You do realize you can just review the trial testimony and see Alan has no idea what he’s talking about, correct? The EDTA was disproven.
Im still waiting on someone to explain how did the blood drops on the sock go from one side straight through to the other side with a ankle in the middle. Blood drops containing blood preservatives thats used in laboratories i might add
It can't be explained because the evidence was weak. They attempted to frame him to win the case.
Simpson may have stepped on them after he took them off
Lol this is so absurd. OJ was guilty
SHAME ON YOU FOR THIS, JUST SHAME ON YOU ALLEN Der. Pathetic!
In short: botched corrupt police procedure got him free but he was guilty as can be. Good riddance!
Racist and ville much?
It's not botched when you lie and plant fake shi# it was a jealous white boy cop mad because OJ fuc#s white women and had money and he tried to date Nicole and was turned down
``Detective Fuhrman, did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case?'' Uelmen asked.
``I assert my Fifth Amendment privilege,'' Fuhrman replied, his attorney standing at his side.
Everyone makes a big deal about that - because they don't understand how the fifth works.
Dershowitz also claimed that he was wearing his underpants during the trial.
a zion telling the trooff? nawwww knee-gohhhhh, nawwwwwwwwwww , g money grippppppp
who?
Wise man Alan. Misunderstood perhaps but wise man.
Did they stupidly or let's check bank accounts.
It didn't save O.J. His life was destroyed. Everyone loves to focus on non-reality. He ended up in jail for a decade, and was vilified by millions, and owing millions left to hide. Then died.
Not true. The case was Lost when it was moved to Downtown LA.
People have a hard time comprehending that police can be capable of planting evidence even after it’s proven
Thoughts and prayers…….to the cancer
Why isn't Dershowitz in prison?
AIPAC
He truly believes in the Constitution. A rare animal these days.
Someone asks: "Why run from cops in first place if you didnt!?" Didn't do the crime. I think the first answer is, because I'm black, in an American society still systemically prejudiced against black people and black agency. A range of other reasonable answers are possible.
Creepy this a major star not a back street hobo running away .....
There is some prejudice. That is a liquid situation.
Yet he had been married to a very good looking white woman. Cry me a river racist baiter.
@@NnNn-yr7mu If you are black you are black period. As Tiger Wood.
The police always looks at the husband/boyfriend first. OJ & Nicole had fights. He knew he was going to be accused and tried for at least abusing her.
He was guilty he had aotive and opportunity. I the police did compromise evidence it did matter he still did it.
Henry Bonsu looks so unrecognisable with his weight loss, even Chris Moyles would be jealous.
Perhaps the fact that he was black he knew he would be blamed?
It’s a pity that after the expensive rich lawyers and media helped the bloody murderer get away with his crime, and the damned jurors acquitted him, after all that the fiend did not go after THEM. It would have been cruel but just. In Biblical terms…
Not one comment about the planted evidence .. i wonder why
I think you sincerely represent Israel, and I watch your videos on subject matter such as that or about the Fani Willis situation. However, I can’t believe your accusations against the LA police.
Damn the cops planted evidence....who would have thought 😂😂😂
Everyone knows he did it cut on his hand his blood at the scene and all around his place
oj simpson made his choice and the LAPD should have not tried to intervene and let the cards fall where they may - which in all honesty would have led other charges carrying less criminal charges due to various reasons and other circumstances - like temporary insanity or the intentional act of setting up an confrontation for the purposes of a fight - between individuals.
The Juice is looser yet again. Free like O.J. allday.
Before and during Mr. Simpson's trial, some things were alleged that did not seem to add up. Allegedly, there were 72 cuts or stab wounds per victim. Each fight with all they had. Supposedly, there were some cuts around the necks that represented a specific gang. Then there was an alleged fight that covered a little distance. It was attributed to Ron Goldman's fight. Even though OJ was a big man all that allegedly happened seem like it required help from someone else. There might have been only a speck or two of blood in O. J.'s vehicle. It may have been planted too. There was no time to clean up the alleged items. There was Allegedly someone else's DNA at the scene. I guess those interested would have to look at a lot of the news and the trial to get a true glimpse of what all was said and how the jury came to the conclusion it did. Mark Furham's actions did not help. Also, it is wrong to convict someone on a crime because it was felt he got away with one. People are convicted on evidence.
that was essentially what tanked the prosecution's case - possible fabricated evidence, inclusive of mark fuhrman's testimony being disqualified for perjury.
Not possible fabricated evidence.. literally planted evidence to frame a man.
Oh please more slime like douchavits.
Ron Goldman had defense would on his hands. OJ had no wounds on his body. So who was Ron fighting? Think people.
he was fighting nobody. he was being sacrificed by his own tribe for the betterment of the entire Toucan Tribe, DUH.
O.J. had a deep cut on one finger. And could not explain how he got it. Ron was fighting O.J.
OJ did have a deep cut on his hand.How would you fight someone with a large knife by suprise?
Think people. How about OJ's friend Al Cowlings friend being there? It's a probability. You figure Goldman had to be taken out first, so is Nicole going to stand around and wait her turn? Or is she being held by Al while OJ does Goldman? As far as him being covered in blood, he had time to change before the bodies were discovered.
@@jak3589 Autopsy showed massive bruising on Goldman's hands; he was a black belt.
I should start up a livestream again lol. it's boring and fake-celebrity-chemistry-feeling isn't for me.
I'm sure this shyster lawyer will get his client a reprieve !
The reason OJ Simpson walked is because OJ hired the best lawyers money could buy, and about a dozen of them. There was simply no way the local DAs could compete with a bunch of lawyers who knew every trick in every book. The rest of us would never have the resources to buy that kind of representation.
Saying all this now dead men cant sue,but we all knew he did it,the Simpsons episode worth a watch.
No, it didn't!
Racial tensions and an n-word got him off.
you can say what you want but the legal team assembled by mr. simpson was very impressive and deadly effective in presenting their case, raising doubt concerning accredited scientific practices - in a case based on scientific evidence, involving blood. they totally and without an reasonable explanation got rid of nicole brown's simpson's stomach contents - unforgivable error.
Allan. LOL
Maybe OJ is now facing a higher court.
Maybe not
I know O.J. loved them crooked cops ✌🏾
Yeah some cop probably a domestic abuser themself and a football fan probably didn't want justice for Nicole so they tainted the scene. Listen to her 911 call too how dismissive the dispatcher is of Nicoles concerns and that was another woman too.
Generally speaking, a well-behaved woman is less likely to call the authorities for help.
Climate control? Ok that's a wrap for me.