Eps 358: Something Fishy About The Hornady 7PRC
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
- Welcome to the Ron Spomer Outdoors Podcast! There seems to be something fishy going on at Hornady. We've got some serious questions about Hornady Ammunition Manufacturing Company. There seems to be something fishy going on at Hornady with the 7PRC Cartridge, and we're going to get to the bottom of it in this episode of Ron Spomer Outdoors Podcast.
Affiliate Links - help support the channel at no additional charge to you
Use Code RSO10 at checkout for either Diamond Blade Knives or Knives of Alaska, and get 10% off your first purchase.
www.diamondbla...
www.knivesofal...
Shell Shock
Use code RSO10 at checkout to get 10% off your purchase
Shop Shell Shock: alnk.to/6TzzKuj
Links:
Website: ronspomeroutdo...
Facebook: / ronspomeroutdoors
Instagram: / ronspomer
Who is Ron Spomer
For 44 years I’ve had the good fortune to photograph and write about my passion - the outdoor life. Wild creatures and wild places have always stirred me - from the first flushing pheasant that frightened me out of my socks in grandpa’s cornfield to the last whitetail that dismissed me with a wag of its tail. In my attempts to connect with this natural wonder, to become an integral part of our ecosystem and capture a bit of its mystery, I’ve photographed, hiked, hunted, birded, and fished across much of this planet. I've seen the beauty that everyone should see, survived adventures that everyone should experience. I may not have climbed the highest mountains, canoed the wildest rivers, caught the largest fish or shot the biggest bucks, but I’ve tried. Perhaps you have, too. And that’s the essential thing. Being out there, an active participant in our outdoor world.
Produced by: Red 11 Media - www.red11media...
Disclaimer
All loading, handloading, gunsmithing, shooting and associated activities and demonstrations depicted in our videos are conducted by trained, certified, professional gun handlers, instructors, and shooters for instructional and entertainment purposes only with emphasis on safety and responsible gun handling. Always check at least 3 industry handloading manuals for handloading data, 2 or 3 online ballistic calculators for ballistic data. Do not modify any cartridge or firearm beyond what the manufacturer recommends. Do not attempt to duplicate, mimic, or replicate anything you see in our videos. Firearms, ammunition, and constituent parts can be extremely dangerous if not used safely.
WaterGate, IraqGate, PizzaGate and now Hornady’s POWDER-GATE! Congrats Hornady, you’ve entered the conspiracy/scandal realm.
Okay, so he talked a lot about the powders and why they can't get the ones they want to get the advertised velocities. That means they KNOW they're not hitting the advertised numbers, and CAN'T. If you don't have the powder to hit the numbers you advertise, adjust the numbers. Don't tell me you can hit 3,000 when you KNOW you can't. Yeah, I know you can't re-run the tests for every lot number. But you CAN work out a CONSERVATIVE estimate that the average guy can expect to achieve. I'd rather buy a box of ammo that advertises 2,900 and actually get 2,950 than get the same speed when you set my expectations at 3,000. Under-promise, over-deliver. Customer loyalty 101, folks. Basics.
@@WengerdRW No argument here. It's better to set good expectations than come up with the Spomer Spin episode.
You would think they have to slap a sticker saying its 2800fps instead of 3000 like the federal loads that use their same ELD-X and meeting the 3000FPS since they still have a supply of the powder hornady were using
@@WengerdRW the bottom line for me is the latest and greatest is not always great ! hand load your ammo and don't buy hornadys target like hunting ammo !
OK, so change the advertise velocity on the box. Until you can get your original powder back
@@michaelgarner4229 Exactly. Throw a sticker on the thing. No big deal.
Choosing to use the most stable powder you can source is all well and good, but even if it's a temporary change, you need to make an announcement and update the box data to the appropriate velocity. No matter your intentions, false advertising is not a good look.
I just got an xbolt in 7prc. All i have to say is thank goodness for Federal! Both the Hornady precision hunter and match ammo avg around 2820fps out of the 24” barrel. They grouped about an inch.
The Outfitter was about 2940 but shot the worst groups ive ever shot.
However the Federal ammo gave me an average of 2985fps and constantly grouped about .75 inch.
Its a super awesome caliber but Hornady really dropped the ball with it.
Did you clean to bare metal before trying CX?
ruclips.net/video/ULVKvt1MCpg/видео.html
@@jhoppmann Yea it was the first ammo i shot in the new barrel. Wouldnt group. I came back to it after about 100 rounds of other ammos. Again with a fresh clean barrel. Still wouldnt group.
Shame because I prefer to hunt with coppers and all my other rifles use only coppers. Mainly barnes though.
@@DanielMartinez0394 i stuck with the copper with my 300prc. Found the right powder and gave the copper some time to seed in and I'm at or under an MOA. I found that the powder and a little closer to the lands seating depth made it work. More time and I'm confident i can get under an MOA easily.
@@DanielMartinez0394even if it’s the first rounds you shot, you might need to clean it, even from a new rifle. Most rifles have fired a few rounds from the factory to verify them I believe (could be wrong or only certain ones do)
@@TheAcesShowa good friend of mine bought himself a 45-70,planning to shoot lead gas-checked bullets. I also thought that barrels were tested by the factory and recommended that he clean before shooting lead for better accuracy. He confirmed that there was copper in the barrel
Hornady should have disclosed the change up-front….people would understand. Long range accuracy DEPENDS on consistent velocity! Hornady don’t BS loyal customers.
@@WengerdRWagree
False advertising = legal no no
Theres an atty thinking a class action would be the correct action
@@robertburke2804Great idea…class action law suit. Ammo shortages everywhere, prices going up, let’s see if we can put one of the best companies out of business or at least make them lose money. Hornady has done a better job than any other ammo company of keeping ammo on the shelves and their components are less expensive than Nosler, Berger, Sierra, or Barnes, yet similar quality. If they weren’t willing to make compromises due to fear of legal action, there would be a lot more empty shelves. I’ll bet that will help the situation. Maybe people should appreciate that they are doing a good job overall and if you they aren’t good enough for you, hand load or spend your money on a different brand…if you can find it in stock
@@WengerdRW and the poor guy that can't afford a chronograph and takes the data off the box of ammo and orders a Leupold cdx scope dial and can't hit a dam thing !
@@WengerdRWjust put a damn sticker on the box with the adjusted numbers…it would cost $0.01
They are ripping people off Ron. If I publish somthing and sell somthing else its fraud is it not?
And its 60 bucks to figure out youve been had!
@@skeegets2
More than that when you consider the cost of the rifle.
I'm a little disappointed in you, Ron - I understand that you have to maintain your relationships in the industry but with all due respect, you came off as too amenable to Seth's explanations.
In today's world there are plenty of opportunities for a company to make it known that a formula has been temporarily changed
I like and respect Ron, but he did work a bit too hard to support the BS from Hornady.
I sure hope Ron actually smelled the BS. That explanation was pure BS.
Change the print on the boxes .
I have been using the same rifle to shoot the Hunter Precision 7mm PRC. The older stuff with lot numbers beginning with a 1 have a higher velocity close to advertised. The boxes beginning with other numbers do not have the same velocity. I appreciate the interview but it feels like damage control. Last week I purchased Federal 175gr ELD-X and the velocity performance is better than Hornady. Maybe they should consider changing the advertised information on the box.
Great info on lot numbers.
@@WengerdRW ~Exactly correct!!
Ron - thanks for getting Seth to attempt to explain the “discrepancies” in 7 PRC velocities. Starting out with “oh yeah the new chronographs are great…” I smell something coming and it ain’t bacon! 🥓
Hornady has damaged its public image. Many of us have not forgotten the jab mandate controversy. If they can’t get the powder needed to achieve “box velocities” then re-print the boxes and acknowledge the problem ahead of time. Attempting to explain it away with “your chamber/barrel is to blame” just makes it worse.
I thought the 7 PRC sounded like an ideal cartridge when it first came out. I was a loyal Hornady customer, owning 2 of their reloading presses and having shot a lot of their bullets. At this point, I want nothing more to do with Hornady. 280 Ackley Improved will get me more than close enough without a magnum primer or a magnum bolt face.
That "new chronographs are great" comment rubbed me the wrong way too. I hand load so I often use one but they got balls to tell someone that just scraped together enough for a budget rifle build that he will have to spend as much or more than he did on the firearm or optic just because he cant trust the manufacturers labeling. Buy Barnes.
Oh boy hornadv is really gonna miss you. Go eat another oatmeal cookie nobody cares
@@foonus406 also, my 20-year old CED is/was a PITA to set up but when done correctly, it worked just fine until I shot the sunscreens (again).
They totally thought that they would get away with not being honest about box velocities, the chronograph remark backs that up in my opinion. It's sleazy marketing at best and shows they don't think much of the average shooter's intelligence.
There is always something fishy going on a hornady
You are correct IMHO. I blame the latest family generation at the helm of Hornady trying to reinvent the wheel.
It just sounds like a bunch of excuses. Nothing he is saying is wrong, but why then lie on the box. They know none of us will have repeatable results. I still buy components, just not buying Horniday Ammo.
Seth is a loyal employee and explained well why "current" lower velocity levels are related to initial test components and are not currently readily available for the volume of ammunition they produce. But they also control the printing press and the numbers printed on their ammo boxes. Printed "Asterisks" can be added to compensate for the discrepancies in velocity, or print a range say; 2,800 - 3,000 fps can be obtained depending on your individual rifle.
A sticker that says velocities may vary. Easily done.
They don't even have to add a range- simply state velocities *UP TO* 3000fps. Problem solved
Yah, this 3000 sticking point is a bit anal IMHO. But that "up to" or a range "from 2800-3000", if printed on all manufacture boxes would resolve it. But I've seen people freak out and cry fraud if it's 50 off. That's just absurd. Maybe I'm wrong, but I understood that there was a rule or something that if it's off by like 10% or 15% or something, then there's a prob and somethings off. These accusations of being off are all well under the 10%.
Sounds like false advertisement and a bunch of BS. is disappointing to hear Ron swallow that crap and seem to be on their side.
My rifle is 1950 m70 in 270 win. And going on 100 yrs and still one of the most popular cartridges out there .that said, it sounds like everyone's right about the 7prc. All he said was why it isn't doing what it is supposed to do shame on hornady. I believe 6.8 is smoking them .
Surely change the box to let your customers know it has the slower “temporary” powder, then return to original box when supply problems are sorted. Would go a long way towards customer confidence. A simple sticker wouldn’t cost much.
Excellent point. Per haps publish the expected velocity as a range. Min/max.
I agree 100%. I would also say that the cost of the reprint of the stickers doesn’t even matter, and Hornady must eat it. While Seth didn’t outright lie during the interview, not admitting that this was an error on their part is dishonest, at best. The largest issue is that people bought the original ammo and now bought a completely different load that they would have no reason to believe they needed to resight in their rifle or calculate new trajectory data. Major error made by Hornady, I just wish they would fess up and apologize.
@@phild9813 Agree, but lying by omission is still lying.
And velocity is accuracy. He even admitted their substitute powder doesn't always perform as they expected.
@@stanwayne7224He also said other cartridges are affected but they're not as scrutinized so no big deal since nobody really notices. Sheesh. Not a good look.
I've said this from the beginning... when the Precision Hunter ammo matches the max velocity published in the books there is something fishy. That ammo is usually called Superformance. Hornady needed to show that their new cartridge would easily outperform the 7mm Rem mag and 6.8 Western. So Hornady used a powder that is unobtainiam (RL-26) to show off this cartridge. Now that they can't get the powder... turns out the 6.8 Western is outperforming it lol.
Hornady needs to update the box velocity. Update it to 2850 FPS, once RL-26 becomes more available start a new line of ammo in 7mm PRC that is called Superformance that gets you that 3000 FPS.
Ive always thought the same here. They had to be using high qual powder to be at that fps claim, the high end of it in the book, and in that case would fall into the super performance line. Ill agree thet need to republish velocities with the current powder they are loading with. That goes for any caliber they are doin, or anyone elsw has had to sub out powders with for that matter. Just be honest is all. I bought early ammo and its up to snuff, but have friends with newer lots that are all down in fps.
Thank you that’s very interesting to get to the bottom of the truth as to why this is happening because of different powers. Use Federal ammo instead. But I think get a 300 PRC “instead of” a 7 PRC.
So what's up with the RL26? I've been trying to get some for over a year now with no success.
@@patrioticguy1791 Unfortunately RL26 has been one of the most difficult powders to buy for years now. But honestly most of the Alliant powders are out of stock most of the time, not just RL26, and because of this I have abandoned them for other brands like VVN500 series, Retumbo (now that it can be found again) Ramshot Magnum, Accurate Magpro, and others. For whatever reason, Alliant just hasn't made their products available to the handloading market with any regularity. All you can do is sign up to be notified when their products are in stock at as many different suppliers as you can find - and act QUICK when you get the notification!
@@patrioticguy1791 It sells out very quickly when it actually is in stock (and that's not often at all). Federal, I'm sure, has no problem getting it because they are affiliated with Alliant through the same company.
Seth is doing a word salad-quick step. He is not answering directly, but is speaking in generalities, rather than taking on the issue directly. I lost respect for Hornady/Seth for his podcast-guest decision. Now, he is defending his baby, 7mm PRC.
😂 Seth is close to a heart attack in that video. He basically starts out by blaming new tech that they even got caught, hilarious.
In god we trust, all other bring data. And in the case of Hornady don’t even believe what they bring you.
Ron never asked the hard question of why the cover up. He was listening to the wrong end of that horse.
So here is my rebuttal. How do the numbers match up with the 6.8 western? Does it come close to velocity stated on factory ammo? If so we have a contradiction. How are they getting to box velocity and Hornady isn’t? Not just 6.8 western or 7mm prc. All ammo should be falling short.
Totally agree
It should not. I get what you’re saying, but you’re more so assuming than anything else. It also shows you were only half listening and ready to be mad. There’s a thousand different kinds of powder used across the entire ammo market, not every single type and brand is going to be affected, mainly because some didn’t have to change anything. And as mentioned Hornady had a choice to maintain speed and picked accuracy until they can get going again, there’s a chance 6.8 producers code velocity. Then again maybe no one has made a big enough stink about 6.8 yet and it’s in the same position.
@@CowboyHunterPodcast Far from mad. Lot of things to get mad about in the world. Ammo velocities aren’t one of them 😂. Regardless of the volumes of powders available. It’s curious that only Hornady is receiving such scrutiny. A lot of companies have fanboys and a lot have critics. In this case I could care less. In this case it’s downright dishonest marketing. Plain and simple. You know what they say about excuses? That applies here.
@@CowboyHunterPodcast I think the real issue is they knew the velocity didn’t match the box and didn’t disclose it. I mean put out a press release and no one would care but they waited till they got caught.
And he admitted that their substitute powder doesn't always perform. Consistent velocity is accuracy. If they are lying about 7prc, what else are they willing to lie about?
Hornandy, most reasonable people can understand and will be ok with your powder shortage explanation…so you came clean on a popular podcast…great…now post a notice on your website for the ones that haven’t seen this…and stop falsely advertising the current 7prc speeds!!! Guys…It’s not rocket science (pun intended)…it’s simply a matter of integrity. I respect a company owning up to the fact they were not willing to compromise on accuracy to maintain potential speed. I’m not gna respect a company falsely advertising…I purchased too many overpriced ELDX Precision Hunter cartridges that didn’t deliver on your specs. With that being said…the 7prc is still an amazing cartridge…your marketing decisions at this time…not your brightest moment.
Complete BS and spin from Seth. Just give consumers the honest info on the box label Hornady - this is deception and unacceptable.
No matter how you butter it, it is still false advertising. Hornady tried to pull the wool over everyone's eyes. But thanks to the advancements in chronograph technology, and the community involvement on the internet, everyone is aware of it. They hoped no one would notice.
Makes you wonder how many other ammo manufacturers are doing it
@@MilwaukeeDillPicklesall of them and none of them, as he explained the tree barrels meet very specific standards and they use the velocity they get. That’s what they post on the box because under the right conditions it can be done. Don’t meet those conditions with your rifle, elevation, and weather and you won’t get the same result. This isn’t a new phenomenon.
@@CowboyHunterPodcast I was implying exactly that hoping the commenter I replied to would come to that same realization and realize it’s not just Hornady
@@MilwaukeeDillPickles honest I think some of these people just want to be mad, I mean no one has been getting posted velocities for probably as long as ammo has been made, but now when there’s ammo that used to get it and doesn’t they’re in a uproar. It’s not unfounded, but they won’t listen so I hear you.
This is why I am boycotting Hornady. I hate liars
I’m generally a Hornady fan, but this is a bad look. If they had to make such a large shift temporarily, it should’ve been communicated. They preach accuracy, but likely have consumers plugging in data to a ballistics calculator that’s 200fps off. So now you’re expected to buy a chronograph and test every box because the velocity may shift back and forth at some point? They tried to hide it under the rug, and only opened up after a wave of complaints.
Another note, this isn’t the only cartridge that uses RL26. Now I’m wondering how accurate the velocity is on my 300wm ELDX.
What's fishy is how many people including myself are up at 3:00 a.m. watching this video.
2:57am
Ok love the information, but why not change the numbers on the box then? If you are going to get a leupold custom turret cut for this particular ammo, when and if it changes that is going to effect your turret that you had made. So frustrating!! I love my fierce twisted in 7prc, and love my leupld scope thing i might not have a turret made and just use the new stickers that backfire showed on his channel. So much to think about. I truly want a turret but no i'm second guessing getting one made. UGH!!!
Guarantee there was a senior level meeting at Hornady which included representation from Sales/Marketing, Operations/Production and Customer Service when they couldn't get the powder. Sales/Marketing won.
Seth said 7 PRC was optimized for RETUMBO and Hornady didn't even publish data for that powder.
He said powders in that range of speed, not neccessarily Retumbo exclusively.
@@John_Redcorn_ Saying that case design is the max you can achieve burn and velocity wise is a straight lie. There was absolutely no reason to shorten the 300 RPC case to make the now 7 PRC. It has been done since before the 300 PRC was even a thing and has shown great performance and success in the wildcat world for over a decade, similar performance to the 28 Nosler with less powder. They just couldn't risk the chance that the 300 PRC would go belly up this soon after development. Even though it might as well, even with all the marketing it has went the same way as the 6.8 western. They dropped it, hyped it up, and there has been little to no support since. They ruined the 7 PRC from the start. We dont need a 7 Rem Mag level performer, we already have one and it has been doing great for 62 years. We wanted something new, that we haven't had before and it is what everybody wanted from the start. 90% of the market for the current 7 PRC is from people like Jim from backfire and others that think its the greatest newest invention created and it just the same thing you already have, just rebranded.
Thanks for bringing this topic up but I think you failed to ask the important/hard questions. If they are aware of the reduced velocity, then why not revise that on the newer boxes of ammunition? Rather than knowingly overstating it. Secondly, there have been reputable tests showing reduced velocity from the newer ammunition from the exact same rifle/chamber. So the explanation of the chamber specs/tolerances is irrelevant when the issue is the reduced velocity of their ammunition.
Most Hornady ammunition I’ve tried is not up to the printed fps on the label in any caliber..
The 30-06 superformace out of a rem 700 with 24 inch barrel was 40-60 under the printed box claim.
Thanks Ron, Hornady just lost a ton of business by not letting people know they changed the recipe. Bad business move.
I just went and bought more Hornady
I’m boycotting Hornady. Never again will I purchase another Hornady product
180 grain Hornady ELD-M factory ammo ran 2785 fps vs 2975 fps published velocity out of my 24” rifle. I emailed Hornady and they quickly and honestly replied, but aren’t honest enough to change the label. They also recommended chronographing 5 - 10 rounds per lot to get my average velocity. So with every different lot of ammo, I have to burn 5-10 rounds because Hornady’s published velocity can’t be trusted. How hard is it to have a box label for each type of powder they use in the 7PRC? Do better Hornady!
Seems like Hornady is giving us a crock of Crap!!! If this is the case, then do they have the tight tolerances with all their ammo? if not why just the 7PRC?? Why not use a gun that the average owner will use and give us real speeds like any other company does??? Ask him if I can get my money back for my boxes of 7PRC Hornady bullets this is false advertisement and misleading period thanks Cheers 🙂
Hornady should have been upfront and told the truth about changes they made. It would lead you to believe that they didn’t and left the numbers inflated to not be outdone by the 6.8 Western at least on paper.
your exactly correct !
I think this is exactly the sticking point for a lot of people. Factory ammo underperforming isn't all that strange. But hornady has admitted that they knew they were shipping ammo that didn't meet the advertised spec because of a (possibly legitimate) decision they made. Slapping a sticker on the boxes is not an impossible thing.
So then a consumer has to wonder why they (seemingly) hoped no one would notice by the time they got the right powders again. (Those dang consumer chronographs!) Coupled up with the all-but-public fact that hornady is hoping that the 6.8 western goes away, and it starts to look like hornady was trying to paper over the fact that their whiz bang cartridge isn't as superior to the western as their marketing suggests.
They purposefully inflated the number to convince people to get a 7prc when a 6.8 western would give them exactly what they want (and in a short action)
@@Marcus-jg4jb where you get it wrong is pinning this on the 7 prc unlike the western there are several other manufacturers achieving the published velocities.
@@OutsidetheEchochamber I'm not sure I understand what you mean. 7prc is the cartridge where hornady has admitted to shipping ammo that isn't meeting their printed velocities.
If Hornady cant make our ammo fast like before- just write this on ammo box.
7 prc is basically another Leprechauns marketing tale. YES, It'll get heavier bullets moving for you and they'll certainly get there when they get there.. complaining keeps leprechaun damage control creative.
Hey Hornady I call BS! We can't all be wrong!
Why wouldn't Hornady come out with this onfo from the start???? This mistake has caused a few people that I know, not to buy a rifle in this cartridge.
Ok.... Hornady changes the formula and that changes the velocity. Great, I would rather have something than nothing, but put change the accurate velocity on the box and let us know. I think most consumers can accept this but can't accept being lied to.
When the 6.8 Western got released Hornady simply said they will not be manufacturing ammunition for that caliber because they were in the process of developing the 7 PRC. They saw the 6.8 Western as a direct competition to their 7 PRC, but it was under performing so they falsely advertise its performance to make it appear to be better than the 6.8 Western.
hornady is a POOP woke company
Nope……
Are you not paying attention? They can’t get the powder right now that they were achieving those numbers with. Federal is accomplishing advertised numbers with their ammo. Try to keep up
I knew i didn't like Seth from Hornady
It's everything but Hornady fault
Yes it is pulling the wool over peoples eyes because when the high-performance powder is not available anymore and instead they use a different kind of powder with slower less performance causing the FPS (Feet Per Second) to reduce (go down). Then they should have instantly “RE-PRINTED and REVISED” (changed) this new “reduced” FPS data on the website and on boxes of ammo accordingly without any delay, and “not” left the FPS numbers inflated.
I have been seeing complaints about Hornady ammunition on RUclips for years now. Almost invariably the complaint is about inconsistency, with a lot of cartridge weight tables and chronoscope work agreeing with the complaints. I have never heard a response from Hornady !
Out west I will stick with my old 25-06 and my 30-06
Good man.
Australia
1. 270 Win. man myself., When I can get 2933 fps. out of a 170 grain Berger, and 3150 fps. out of a 150 grain Nosler. What do I need a 6.8 Western. and for 7mm, I will just get a 7mm Rem. Mag. or 7mm Weatherby. 2. So I think the entire PRC line is over rated, having said that, I am finding barrels to big and bullets too small if you get both, not only will you get poor fps. but your precision will be ugly to say the least. 3. I have found certain cases that will not load or load very tight. We need to get back to tight standards. Great Show.
The benefits of the modern cartridge designs is not velocity. With rangefinders, velocity isn't as important anymore, because compensating for drop is pretty easy as long as you know the distance and have done a bit of practice. I personally use my .308 to 600m regularly without issue, however the wind is always a challenge.
The 6.8 Western is made to run the heavy 160-175gr bullets and 7 PRC is made for the 175-195gr bullets as to mitigate wind. If you go down to a 150gr with a 7 PRC, I 100% agree that you might as well buy a Rem Mag.
Personally, I only have a .308 and I'm looking to get a magnum for those 600m+ shots and simply the 7 PRC fits my needs - something not too massive, doesn't need any special work to run the 180gr ELD-M which has a rediculously good BC for the wind and energy retention and I can buy it in a Factory Rifle (Howa 1500, I'm just waiting on the 26" Varmint version of it). The best alternatives I see for what I'm looking for are a Sherman, 7 LRM, or other options that aren't factory supported.
Also for 2, do you mean small cartridges with long barrels? Personally I love my .308 with the 26" barrel it has. It's a beast to carry around with the braked suppressor on it, but I'm running a 178gr ELD-X load at around 2800fps without any pressure signs. Basically duplicating reloaded .30-06 loads but with 30% less powder and it recoils less than my friends .222 lol.
I'm in the process of a new hunting rifle build, and I was on the fence between the 7PRC and 6/8 Western. This just tipped the scales.. Going with the 6.8 Western - I get it the ammo is not available, but I reload, so that is not a factor, brass might be, but box ammo isn't.
Great choice!! Seekens has a terrific rifle in 6.8 Western.
Also, for ammo, one ordered from Pendleton Ammunition and Choice ammunition. Choice is getting low on their 6.8 Western, but they just emailed me that they’ll be receiving brass here shortly.
You’ll Love the Western
It just make sense. Even more so since my go to always rifle is one of my 270Win’s thanks for all the info!
Seth learn from Democrat answers in congressional hearings. So why are other calibers not having as much impact, and why is Hornady not manufacturing 6.8 Western bullets or loading ammunition for it.
The Subject matter starts near 30:00
👍
I was here for everything but that.
Holy crap 30 minutes in the actual meat of the matter starts? Wow.
True, but the first 23mins or so before thay isn't bad.
Short Answer - They changed Powder, therefore the Performance has changed, Therefore Hornady should RePrint the Label. i Think all they had to do is change the Label. And let everyone know
I have a Rem 700 Sendero in the. 264 Win Mag.....I love that cal. it's super accurate, and it's a conversation piece too. Some old things shouldn't die off.
The FACTS still point to this...
Hornady designed and marketed the 7 PRC cartridge based upon MAXIMUM POTENTIAL, requiring the top components in loading today.
Two things.
1. That's clearly NOT SUSTAINABLE, and is unrealistic.
HORNADY NEEDS TO CHANGE THEIR BOX ADVERTISING, TO REFLECT REAL WORLD PERFORMANCE... NOT PERFECT LAB SCENARIOS.
2. What if all the Ammunition mfg made and advertised cartridges with maximum performance numbers?
Would the 7 PRC really stand out then?
Or... would the 7 RM show numbers similar to it?
Bottom line.
People are buying the 7 PRC rifles, based upon theoretical claims by Hornady, which are unrealistic due to their inability to deliver the Ammunition, designed for maximum performance... so they continue to 'sell' the same numbers, while telling us "were sorry, but it's not our fault that we cannot get the powder that works.... so we're just going to sell you something different.... but we don't need to change the data on the box. "
If this is reality...
Then the 7 PRC really ISN'T any better than the 7RM... or the 6.8W.
Shame on Hornady.
Jack O'Connor is still right. All you need is a 270 130 grain for deer, and antelope ---and 150 grain for elk and moose --- end of discussion with new fancy cartridges 😮
And 150 grain for elk and moose
Or the 30/06 with 180 grain for everything.
Or a 6.8 Western for the same thing, but can reach out a lot further and with less wind drift.
Love Hornady...'but' when you still advertise it as over 3000fps...and come up with an EXCUSE of why it doesn't... well... you're a LIAR. Period 👍. Ps. Don't beat around the bush 🌳. Thanks Ron. God 🙏 Bless ✝️💛.
People aren’t going to like this, but I’ve seen similar results on the 7mm PRC and I’ve seen the opposite on my 6.8 Western. My 20” 6.8 Western is shooting 162gr at 3075 fps. Both my Garmin and neighbors magneto speed were showing within 2 fps. I’ll keep the 6.8 Western over the 7mm PRC.
I was very disappointed in the 7 PRC, my experience was the same as other only getting 2800 FPS and not the 3000 FPS. I feel as if this was false advertisement on Hornady's part and they cost a lot of people money. I bought a 7 PRC for the velocity and now I am out money because it isn't there. Hornady has lost my support. I love how the Hornady rep was trying to save face by going way in depth on the SAAMI specs. They got caught in a bold face lie and won't admit it.
My Weatherby ammo is more expensive but it actually gets the promised performance.
Same. And for the price we pay......it better!
Everything Seth's says is fine, but Hornaday should put a sticker on the box!
Honestly is always the best policy!!!!!!
The 7PRC is really nice but honestly I prefer a 300 PRC. Yes the 7MM is a flatter shooting cartridge but not by much and the 300 is bring more energy and a larger frontal diameter for terminal performance
I got the 300 before the 7 was announced. No regrets, just puts a smile on my face.
@@chadperry4021 I agree I’ve had nothing but success with my 300 PRC I’m slinging a 208 Barnes at 3075
@@EasternMountainHunters that is comfortably 175 fps more than the 300 win mag will do. Nice, I’m just shooting factory 225 eldm at 2836 for a fun target round.
@@chadperry4021 yea nothing wrong with the factory stuff but once I started handloading for the 300 PRC it really came to life. You can push those 212 eldx pretty fast also. I haven’t hit pressure signs with any of my brass yet. Just found a good node and plenty of speed in recommended charge weights.
I get the change in powder, Watching this I got an infomercial on excuses and BS from a company trying to bury the 6.8 Western, this guy is absolutely an excuse machine for a cartridge that doesn't live up to the hype
I understand why Hornady did what they did. Everything he said makes sense. What doesn't make sense is, why they won't change the velocity on the box, even if it's not permanent. While they're running the powder that they're running now, the box posted velocities should be adjusted. What do I know though? I'm just a dumb hillbilly.
When he started about chronographs. I knew was going to be something we are doing wrong. Just say you lied and over pressured and change the velocity on the box.
6.8 Western has way better velocity with factory ammo. hornady doesnt like it cause its crushes their precocious prc's, They dont make 6.8 ammo. should have asked him why....
I hope the 6.8 Western gets the steam and backing it seemingly deserves again.. if the components were readily available it would be my choice hands down over the 7mm PRC.. not that the 7mm PRC is a bad choice
I think Seth's explanation was a bunch of word salad garbage. I think the cartridge is simply underperforming in factory ammo. I haven't hand loaded for mine yet, and I haven't reached the point of regretting the purchase, but hand loading I believe is essential with this cartridge.
Wow Hornady thanks for the bs. Why not just be honest. The average hunter will never own a match grade rifle. As a hunter i will never by ammo from hornady again. Buy a rifle in 6.8 western or 280ai. As a hunter out of my normal winchester model 70 i get appropriate velocity's and its not even match grade.
Once Hornady ran out of the powder that gave them that velocity, they should’ve suspended production of that particular load until they could replicate its performance.
Sorry Seth, but that’s dishonest to just continue on marketing a load with different powder and different end results.
They should have been held to account in the above on this interview. Hornady just lost more respect with this interview.
If Ron would’ve challenged Seth on continuing to produce without the same recipe and performance Hornady would’ve had to admit they were in error.
I'll just stick with mt 7mm Mag & 7mmO8.
The 175 eldx is a bit too much for a standard twist 7mm rem mag. If you compare the 7mm rem mag shooting the Hornady 162 eldx precision hunter ammo at 2975 fps against the 7 PRC shooting the 175 eldx at 2800, the energy from 500-1000 yards is almost identical. These numbers are using Hornady's ballistic calculator at 5000 ft elevation, 40 degrees temp. At those velocities, the 7mm rem mag will maintain 1500 ft/lbs out to about 800 yards. Exactly the same for the 7 PRC. For deer, the 7mm rem mag holds 1199 ft/lbs of energy at 1000 yards, while the 7 PRC has 1226 ft/lbs of energy at 1000. The 7mm rem mag also shoots flatter at these velocities. At 500 yards, the 7 mag drops 41.4 inches while the 7 PRC drops 46.8. At 1000 yards the 7 mag drops 241 inches while the 7 PRC drops 266.7. You really lose the advantage of the super high BC 175 eldx at 2800 fps. Its almost a little overweight and you sacrifice trajectory. But I wonder if the precision hunter ammo for the 7mm rem mag has been replaced with slower powder as well. Probably can't trust the velocity on that box either.
Hornady bringing another cartridge to market that they cannot keep up with demand or performance, i am not surprised.
The problem is, like almost everything else, we aren't making it ourselves! We certainly have the resources, so we need to stop counting on other countries, to manufacture the resources we use. It's a really dumb practice, when we've got no control over production, and then get held hostage on materials we use!
A Hornady salesman telling us why they're ammo isn't underpowered. Nope. I'm done with Hornady and their excuses too.
And Hornady still skirting around the truth. It’s fine if you don’t want to change accuracy and I agree but stop
Printing it on your packaging. Also apparently Federal has a boat load of the high performance powders. Honestly, the 6.8 Western seems to perform as well as the 7PRC at the newer velocities people are getting. Then let’s blame the rifles.
Lol ignorant and uneducated
Yea they lost all my respect
The 7mm PRC IS A FINE CARTRIDGE WHEN MADE BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN HORNADY!!! THERE FTX BULLETS ARE SIMILAR GREAT IDEA POOR EXECUTION!!@@michaelthrelkeld212
I was done with them when they started pushing target ammo as hunting ammo.
So let's see I can buy a 6.8 and pay 3x as much for the ammo; if I can actually find it for sale. I can maybe find a handful of rifles that are chambered in the 6.8 caliber. Plus if it actually doesn't take hold in the market it can become obsolete in a few years (remember the 250 Savage or the .35 Remington). Or I can use my good old 270win. The 270 does essentially the same thing. Lots of guns and quality ammo available for the 270 and at reasonable prices. The moose, bear, elk and deer that I've killed with the 270 didn't wonder why I didn't use a 6.8 when they were in my oven...lol But hey the gun and ammo manufacturers need the money, so go for it. I'm OK with my 270 and 30-06 with the modern bullets and powder, who cares or needs anything else! For my money, I would rather spend it on traveling to new destinations to hunt and fish rather than buying hyped up toys that do the same thing as the gear that I already have.
The "mystery powder" is the competitions (Winchester) Staball HD. I'm surprised how many times Seth mentioned temperature stability, because it has been tested and proven quite a few times that the Staball lineup of powders is not at the same level of temperature insensitivity as any of the Hogdon extreme powder lineup it's being substituted for.
It is not. But it is pretty good however and will meter much better if you use a powder measure. Also in theory it should extend your barrel life because supposedly the staball powders don’t generate as much heat.. supposedly lol.
@TheCodyO I'm not sure about the heat but I'll tell ya what I found to work well for me. The Vihtavuori
560 powder put 5 shots in a half MOA group with a 1.63ES and SD of 0.85.. using hornadys own spent brass and their 175 ELD-X after tuning seating depth.. the chronograph showed 1840. Another thing I noticed was when I went to clean the barrel after the seating depth testing, there was considerably less carbon fouling and carbon ring than the box offerings with the Staball HD.
@@foonus406 what your telling me hear is you own a chronograph that measures speed to a hundredth of a foot per second and that your reloads were 1000 fps slow.. I’m glad you feel you have success but vet your numbers a little.
@TheCodyO labradar averages the 5 shots for those numbers. That's what it showed. More than happy to sacrifice 100 fps for something that gives a consistent SD. Your most consistent node is rarely your fastest but if you want to cut down the life of your barrel by all means go ahead and send em hot.
wish you would have asked him why they still print the old numbers
If Hornady was honest about the slower 7 mm PRC ammo, they would have issued a press statement about their problems and adjust the velocity figures and data on the website and ammo boxes... They wanted to pull a fast one on consumers... I'll stick to my 7 mm Rem Mag...
They punt a lot of money into the development of the 7 PRC and they want to puss it to recover their investment... I don't trust them anymore...
It seems like everyone wants a do it all, 1,000 yard elk cartridges. But what about African game, the Big 5, what is needed to drop anything with predator hunting, double barrel rifle options like the world class firearms of Purdy and Sons, Holland and Holland etc, differences between the 458 REM Mag to say the 458 Lott, is 375 H&H the absolute minimum for dangerous African game, just so many directions to go with that. I want a dangerous game setup for North America, so what should I pull from our colleagues across the pond, to use on our Apex species?
And I don’t see hunters using these small diameter plinkers for serious dangerous game needs.
Comment on barrel length.
Using a model 307. 280 AI is 24", the 7mm PRC IS 22", then the 7mm Rem is 26" ????. I dont get it. Barrel length = more velocity. Why arent all 3 wearing a 26" barrel?
My 7 STW, 264 Win Mag, 300 PRC WEAR 26" BARRELS. 6.5X300 wears a 26", 6.5 PRC a 24", 6.5 RPM a 24". In my 264 win, 2" of barrel = 150 fps. My 358 ulta Mag aka 358 Towsley, wesrs a 27.5", i wanted a 250 grain going 3000 fps. Well the 27.5" barrel gave me just that without over pressure burning gobs of 7828 sparked by a Winchester Magnum Primer.
If you wanna go fast, gotta pay the piper.
😂false advertising
I think im gonna the 6.8 western. I believe Hornady 100% time will tell. I think they should just mark the boxes 2800 fps.
Maybe the soon to be NATION OF TEXAS can start opening new ammo factories as well as reloading sources of supplies.
The 300 and 6.5 prc same way over rated
they force that jab on their workers at a greater velocity then their 7mm prc
the 7 prc was redlined from the get go, it's great to get a certain velocity with A powder. for example, the 200 gr eldx win mag gets velocity 2200 fps lower than what it can be reloaded too. you can get the 300 win man velocities hornady gets without max loads out of 30 powders. they won't redline the 300 wm or the 7 rem mag because it won't make their prc's a must buy!
Haha what? Uh no. Maybe from a factory ammo standpoint but not if you roll your own
If they knew why wasn't the date changed on the box. That doesn't sound honest.
I agree about shot distance, at long range the bullet takes time to get to it's target. Even with a perfect drop compensation and perfect wind call the animal has enough time to do almost anything from complete miss to a leg shot. Just too much chance to shoot it's nose off and it can't be shot again but will certainly die horribly. Keep your shots as close as you think they can't possibly be accidentally dodged.
Use federal they can still get the powder.
I recall that Article on the 29 BS had forgot about it.. Thanks for the reminder.
If not already confer with the orginal Rifle Looney on the 7x57 of yours. I have tried some of his thoughts in print on it n those have Well They worked. Might help you as well.
Bought a few 7 REM mags in the last year and I’m glad I did.
Hey, Ron Maine North Woods Hunter here. I Love your show and listen to them all the time. I am sure that a lot of people are in the same boat as I so I will say this. I do not own a chronograph so I rely on what ballistics are either on the box or what is advertised for the specific cartridge that I use for hunting. We as hunters rely on these ballistics to sight in our rifles that way we can also pay attention to the ballistics at longer ranges. No hunter that I know wants to injure or wound an animal. We are hunters and we are humane. Why does Hornady not change the ballistics on the box to match the new powder? Even if it is just 50 FPS slower that will make a difference down range eventually. I just do not want to be off on my shot because the advertised ballistics is off. I have a 7mm Rem Mag in a Christensen Arms Mesa LR. I am thinking on trading it in for the Waypoint 20/20 or the Bergara B14 squared crest. The waypoint advertises a 24" Barrel and the Bergara has a 22" How much velocity difference will there be between the two?
Ron pressure variation is velocity variation is accuracy i know you are not that dumb if you are going to play the role of reporter you should have pushed back at Seth when he lied to ypur face
Wow im first and i have nothing to say..
We need to invade Australia.😮
I’m in the first ten and have nothing 😂too
My Setup last fall in Canada,
Browning X-Bolt Speed 7PRC,
24" Barrel
AVR. 2831 fps with ELD-X
6 degrees Celsius @ ~ Sea level
using a Garmin Xero C1 Pro
7.5 Swiss...? .296 bore. .306-308 bullet!!! I use .308 bullets for mine. Works just fine.
Can't believe what passes for information, and the laziness in actual research.
Great info Ron.
As usual you do a fantastic job helping us out!!!
I have a 7 PRC with a 26 inch Shilen barrel
Velocity for me with the Hornady 180 Eld-M avg 2880 fps with the newer boxes of ammo
Hornady 175 Eld-X was very similar
Federal 175 Eld-X avg 3020 fps
All 3 shot moa or better for me
I have shot the 180's out to 1 mile and they performed quite well for factory ammo at that distance
I really enjoy my 7 PRC regardless of Hornady's failure to give us shooters what they say they are
Keep up the good work Ron!!!
Hornady just needs to update the velocities on the boxes.
If bullshit was music, Seth would be a brass band
There are no minerals in the ground in the EU that we don't have here in North America. It's the proprietary recipes for those powders that are issue. A deal could be made to manufacture these powders domestically if you wanted it bad enough. Those powder companies could be willing to expand production over here for American domestic consumption. The war in Ukraine is going to be going on for years, at this point the west should be building up capacity and make it a priority. It won't happen cause the domestic powder makers will not like that Idea and their lobby is powerful.
Should have changed the printed velocity on the box.
Then Hornady should change the box.