Him: You may suborn any piece- Me: * Starts suborning the king. * Him: -except for the king. Me: * sighs * fine. Also me: * Starts suborning the diplomat. *
Well one move I can think of is if you move your diplomat to a square where any opponent piece and diplomat is accessible. If you suborn the piece so that it puts the king in check, they'll have to take care of that first. And then now you have room to suborn their diplomat
I feel like the diplomat and the circular chess board need to be played with separately. Both additions alone make Chess far more interesting, but I want to see them played individually.
@@Rexvivor that would still require altering the board substantially, chess boards are 8x8 so either it would be off center, it wouldn’t align to the grid, or the dimensions of the entire board would have to be changed
@@zackbuildit777 diplomat chess is literally named after the diplomat piece, which has several nuances and uses that alone would shake up normal chess. The circular chess board adds another layer of complexity that distracts from that, and should be used in it's own game.
I don't know professional chess, so honestly that move looked fake. Since when can you just chose to move a pawn diagonally when not capturing? And I need to look up this castling thing apparently
I think the diplomat would be a game changer in normal chess. Just imagine changing the flanking Rook, Bishop, Etc. to save the king and getting a new teammate at the cost of the highly mobile queen
Very fair point, plus if chess had lore it could make some sense as the kjng would be like " why would I risk my wife getting killed?" So instead he gets a very clever and convincing diplomat to bribe nearby enemies with education.
And then they sac their knight for the diplomat. Leaving your opponent with the only diplomat on the board, giving them the advantage. Because of the diplomat's ability, I would value it the same as the queen, despite the lack of movement capabilities, it is an excellent piece because it can give you a significant material advantage without removing any piece from the board, as such you should protect it at all costs against long range pieces.
@@Bigzthegreat the Knight is great in the center because it can attack any square in the first two circles. This is unlike the Bishop and Rook which can only attack unobstructed squares
I can imagine the amount of times you move a piece into a different ring and suddenly a rook does a 180° across the board cause you forgot they could do that
You could think of it either as someone convincing the other side to join your cause, as the name "diplomat" would suggest, but you could also think of it as you forcefully subverting the will of the piece and taking control of it to kill who they look up to. Either pacifistic and noble, or cruel and brutal.
I would argue whether the move on 1:01 makes the pawn closer to the starting point of the opposing king. It is true geometrically speaking (if you simply measure distance between cell centers with a ruler), but in the metric of the board itself the central field is closer for a pawn to its target than the one on the side: the pawn can reach the destination from the center in 3 moves, but it takes at least 4 moves (5 if you're not allowed to return to the center) from the black field on the side. So, I think it's worth mentioning in the rules that 'closer' should be understood in the purely geometrical sense here.
Any move that I think is towards the king basically through the middle is the middle, which all 5 spaces forward are closer assuming we're going from middle of the space
I'm not actually good at chess but have a lot of fun playing around. A far easier way to use the diplomat would be: Take regular chess. Replace the two pawns in the middle of each player with a diplomat. A diplomat moves one step diagonally or forward and captures like a pawn. However, a capture replaces the diplomat with the captured piece of the other color, e.g. if a black diplomat captures a white knight, after capture you take the diplomat off the board and put a black knight on its place. This diplomat of course can check the king and capture en passant or be captured en passant.
1:15 This rule doesn't actually seem to be true. ONLY exiting the circle at the top puts the pawn closer to the king than it was before. Exiting to the squares to the side, the way you showed, puts the pawn at the same distance it was already at when it was in the circle.
the whole idea of 'pawns can only move closer to the kings initial position' is hilariously poorly thought out and implemented, this entire chess variant feels kinda stupid in general honestly
@@empty5013 I honestly think the circular board idea is pretty good and interesting though the pawn movement is indeed very scuffed up, I also saw another variant with a circular board but there bishops were extremely underpowered while rooks were op, meanwhile here they are sorta on the same level just like in regular chess. Plus the concept of the diplomat is very interesting and fun.
Comment about the Diplomat: 4:25 - There may be a problem with the Suborn Power not so much from game-balance but from practicality: The actual number of chess pieces that are in a set. Aside from a Queen, which is relevant only in variants like Quadular, where there are Royal Pieces besides the King and Queen that can serve the Diplomat's function, there are multiples of each chess piece in the same color. Therefore, by said practicality, the Suborn Power should have the following limit: *A chess piece may only be Suborned if you do not have the maximum number of that chess piece on your side for the set that you are playing* If you use a standard chess piece set with this circular setup, this provides a limit of 8 Pawns for your side, but you may Suborn your opponent's Knight, Bishop, or Rook without having yours captured first. In most cases, the following restriction would be installed as a result of the prior rule, but should be part of the "Diplomat" ruleset in any event: *You may not Suborn your opponent's King or Diplomat* Suborning the opponent's _singular_ Diplomat would give a player a distinct advantage in that that play has a monopoly on the Suborn power until such time as a pawn may be promoted. If a game has multiple Diplomats, they may be Suborned. There are 2 other rules that I would like to submit that may increase the Suborn power, one of which requires Plunder Chess: *A Diplomat, in the process of Suborning a Pawn, may either retain the Pawn or promote the Pawn to a Knight or Bishop if there are fewer than 2 Knights/Bishops on the board in total.* Knights and Bishops are "Minor Pieces"; no bribing a Pawn with a promotion to Radial-and-Circumferential Rook, Queen, or Diplomat. *If playing under the Plunder Chess setting, a Diplomat, in the process of Suborning a chess piece, may Invest that chess piece with any available Vest. Said Vest must be legally available to the Suborned chess piece. Queen Vests allow the Queen's movement range; if playing a variant with both Rook and Bishop but no Queen, the Queen's vest allows both the Rook's and Bishop's movement ranges. The King's vest grants Diplomat powers instead of King's powers and may be used to Suborn instead of Capture. As the King's Vest grants Diplomat powers, it is available to all Suborned chess pieces. Since Diplomats may not Capture, nor may they be Suborned, they may not acquire Vests. If playing with the Pawn Promote variant, a Pawn may not be both Promoted and Vested when Suborned* "King's Powers" include Succession and/or Vulnerability in addition to Movement range. I would also allow the Diplomat to move 1 or 2 spaces in any direction on a standard or larger Chess board. A Diplomat may not capture but may "Jump" over an adjacent chess piece. Diplomats would not be subject to en passant if granted 2 spaces. The Suborning Power would still only work on adjacent chess pieces. If, in lieu of being able to move 2 spaces under any circumstance, a Diplomat is instead granted a Pawn's doublestep, they would then be vulnerable to en passant, regardless of their direction. The doublestep may be used to move closer to the center from the outer 2 ranks or files on each side, but may only be used orthogonally, not diagonally. A diplomat must follow a doublestep with a single move before being able to doublestep again. Aside from this restriction, a Diplomat may use the doublestep as many times as they want. Again, the Suborning Power would still only work on adjacent chess pieces. Conversely, a Diplomat should be able to Suborn a Pawn that took a doublestep in an _en passant_ manner, but only on the turn immediately following that doublestep. The Suborned Pawn is placed where the _en passant_ capture would normally occur.
Any pieces move more crazy then a queen in normal chess, this is insanity xDDDD I need stockfish to tell me what moves are legal and available, can't handle this game haha
Because in chess cavalry don't exist, the horses just know how to kick the enemy where it hurts to kill them, "sigma horse grindset" is what any knight in chess would tell ya when you ask them how they attack without cavalry.
I like this variant a lot more than Star Trek chess. I feel it trains better for orbital combat, especially with bishops and rook movement around the rings.
After checking out your channel, and seeing this game, I'm surprised you don't have a video explaining Dejarik (also called "holochess", the holographic chess game played in Star Wars).
I think the last part of the rules is a bit wrong. I think he meant if the same move is repeated by the same player 3 times in a row as the only move that player can take, then the game is a draw.
Is there such a thing as Hexagonal Chess? Like normal chess except the board grid is made of Hexagons instead of squares? Cuz I feel like some cool things could be done with that.
Why can the knight/horse move to the center when it is standing on the outer ring? Isn't that too far away? Or does the center count as an adjacent field, so the knight moves technically to its left/right?
It gets a little weird how it's worded, but the center "square" is considered diagonally, beside, and immediately forward of every adjacent square. So the knight would move 2 squares twards the center, and 1 square 'into' the center, into acting as if the knight changed directions.
The pawn capture rules are a bit unclear. Let's say you are on space A, and could move to space B, but neighboring space B is space C, with a piece you could capture. From A to B gets closer to the front, but from B to C is further away. Is capturing from A to C a legal move?
Yes. If you look at the diagram drawn when explaining pawn captures, one of the lines does point back towards that player's own starting side. As long as the target piece is adjacent to both your pawn AND to a space that pawn could legally move, it can capture there.
So basically, if you get a rook or bishop to the center, the opposing king is screwed unless they can hide behind another piece, or the rook gets captured
Comment about the board: That center area is very large; large enough for 6 chess pieces, 3 to a side. There are 2 ways this could be addressed: Option 1: When the Center Space is occupied only by the Player's chess pieces, then said Player may land on or pass through that space as though it was unoccupied. When chess pieces controlled by the Opponent are in the Center Space, they block the space. A player may Capture their choice of ONE of the Opponent's chess pieces within the Center Space; likewise, a Diplomat may Suborn only one of the Opponent's chess pieces in the Center Space. The Center Space may be occupied by chess pieces of both sides. A chess piece currently in the Center Space may not Capture an Opponent's chess piece within the Center Space; they must first leave the Center Space then legally reenter on a future turn. A Diplomat in the Center Space may Suborn an Opponent's chess piece within the Center Space. Option 2: Break the Center into 6 Spaces, 3 on each side. Both of the spaces in-line with the center 3 files are colored Yellow; the spaces immediately clockwise form the yellow spaces are colored Red and the spaces counter-clockwise from the yellow spaces are colored Blue. Center Spaces are Orthogonally adjacent to the 2 spaces behind/outside of it (3 spaces for Yellow spaces), the same color space on the opposite side, and the center spaces immediately clockwise and counter-clockwise of it. Center Spaces are diagonally adjacent to the 2/3 spaces behind/outside of it, the 2 spaces in the inner ring immediately adjacent to those, and the 2 Center Spaces that are not orthogonally adjacent to the space in question. I think that I would prefer Option 2, though I'm still trying to process how it would impact the Bishop.
Stating the pawn movement rule as 'closer to the starting space of the enemy king' kinda works intuitively, but is a bit ambiguous because there are multiple paths forward, so distance to a space is not well defined. If you take it to mean _shortest_ distance then the rule doesn't work as stated (any move not towards center at best leaves shortest distance the same, and some moves from center increase shortest distance). However, if "closer" means "reduce _maximum_ (forward) distance" then this rule may work still...
The diplomat piece would be kinda broken in normal chess ngl. You effectively double the value of every capture it makes at the cost of no queen. This thing could control space with pawns like it's nothing
I heavilly doubt it would be broken, its movement being the same as the king would make it slow AF and just as easy (if not easier) to capture as the king, though if it did get into the range of an enamy piece it could give you an advantage by converting, you likely won't ever convert a rook or bishop to your side, maybe a knight if your lucky, and the dream of a suborned pawn promoting just makes the diplomat's mouth water at the thought although it would probably never happen.
@@Greggorto it's a variation on the quote from the Incredibles, "and when everyone is super, no one will be..." To "and when everything is OP, nothing will be."
Welcome to Chess 2. As the name implies, there are only 2 changes. 1. The board 2. The rules
Lol
connect 4 (it is chess2)
Edit: 3. The pieces.
@@hhhbkid most pieces stay
@@Greggorto It was smart-aleck way of saying there are more changes than the board and the rules. I know most pieces stay.
It feels like that "control the center" thing has never been more relevant.
A Rook or Bishop against a bare King just has to reach the center and it's an unaided checkmate.
However, the center is also the most dangerous position, as it's the easiest to get to.
@@KororaPenguin man, it feels like you have to have the king completely surrounded, since you can get checked from the most absurd angles.
Him: You may suborn any piece-
Me: * Starts suborning the king. *
Him: -except for the king.
Me: * sighs * fine.
Also me: * Starts suborning the diplomat. *
Lol
this requires serious stalemate
Well one move I can think of is if you move your diplomat to a square where any opponent piece and diplomat is accessible. If you suborn the piece so that it puts the king in check, they'll have to take care of that first. And then now you have room to suborn their diplomat
@@dudono1744 discovered checks work probably
@@dandanthedandan7558 if you move to a square where an oposing piece and a diplomat are accessable they will just suborn your diplomat first.
I feel like the diplomat and the circular chess board need to be played with separately. Both additions alone make Chess far more interesting, but I want to see them played individually.
But the main feature of diplomat chess is the center space? So removing the circle board from diplomat chess gets rid of its main feature too
@@zackbuildit777 chess but there's a 3x3 red space in the middle of the board
@@Rexvivor that would still require altering the board substantially, chess boards are 8x8 so either it would be off center, it wouldn’t align to the grid, or the dimensions of the entire board would have to be changed
@@zackbuildit777 diplomat chess is literally named after the diplomat piece, which has several nuances and uses that alone would shake up normal chess. The circular chess board adds another layer of complexity that distracts from that, and should be used in it's own game.
@@zackbuildit777 2x2
The diplomat be like (quite literally): It is not about winning, it's about the friends we made along the way!
Perfect.
Diplomat: "It's not about victory... It’s about _THE METS BABY LOVE THE METS ALRIGHT BABY LET’S GO GET A HOME RUN BABY LOVE THE METS LET’S GO METS."_
Considering the name I like to imagine the diplomats gives some seriously good education to bribe enamy pieces to join the diplomat's army
Yes
Just accept it -- with some games it's easier to just explain the rules than to explain how they differ from chess.
Heresy!
Monopoly is just like regular chess except instead of pawns, knights, bishops, rooks, queens, or kings, you have a battleship.
for example minecraft
@@bobafettjr85 is castling still allowed?
@@iamdigory it's called hoteling in Monopoly but yes it's still allowed.
3:45 I can't get over how the lines for the bishop looks like it got tenticals ready to eat some pieces
hikaru be like
@@desm0sgraphcalc lol
"tenticals"
RELEASE THE KRASHOP
Krashop: *religious squid noises*
Ah yes, the negotiator
Negotiation indeed
General kenobi
Indeed
"the rules are the same as regular chess except for these changes"
[continues to change all of the rules of regular chess]
"En passant is not allowed"
* shuts down video *
ikr
He said horse instead of knight so now I'm confused
Unholy heaven
@@phabidz it moves slightly differently from the Knight when involving the center space so it gets a different name
I don't know professional chess, so honestly that move looked fake. Since when can you just chose to move a pawn diagonally when not capturing? And I need to look up this castling thing apparently
I think the diplomat would be a game changer in normal chess. Just imagine changing the flanking Rook, Bishop, Etc. to save the king and getting a new teammate at the cost of the highly mobile queen
Very fair point, plus if chess had lore it could make some sense as the kjng would be like " why would I risk my wife getting killed?" So instead he gets a very clever and convincing diplomat to bribe nearby enemies with education.
I gather that a key strategy is to get the diplomat next to the center.
And then they sac their knight for the diplomat. Leaving your opponent with the only diplomat on the board, giving them the advantage. Because of the diplomat's ability, I would value it the same as the queen, despite the lack of movement capabilities, it is an excellent piece because it can give you a significant material advantage without removing any piece from the board, as such you should protect it at all costs against long range pieces.
your knight is good to attack the center but not to occupy it. I would put a rook or bishop on it due to their ability to control the whole board.
Maybe getting your king in the center. It's pretty much impossible to checkmate it while it's there. (You'll atleast delay it by 1 turn.)
@@aaronking2020 the knight will just push you out of the center
@@Bigzthegreat the Knight is great in the center because it can attack any square in the first two circles. This is unlike the Bishop and Rook which can only attack unobstructed squares
As a diplomat, I can confirm that this is how we go about business
I imagine the diplomat chanting the conversion spell from age of empires' monks.
"Wololo"
*Rook changes colours*
"Narwini"
mmmm
One of the most interesting chess variants yet
This is not a chess variant.
@@qwq1017 then what is it
@@osk5830 A chess variant
@@wolflightning2331 i know, i was asking qw q what they thought it was if its not a chess variant
@@osk5830 A game.
Figuring out how the bishop moves through the center and explaining coherently is an accomplishment
Was it necessary to say that en passant is not allowed when the pawns can’t even move 2 spaces? You just did it to taunt us, didn’t you?
It's for people who don't know that en passant exists because pawns can move 2 squares
The diplomat when he's near a piece of the other team: "WOLOLO!"
I can imagine the amount of times you move a piece into a different ring and suddenly a rook does a 180° across the board cause you forgot they could do that
The diplomat is now my new favorite piece because it's a pacifist piece (sort of).
I always thought it was like a zombie, infecting all the pieces in sight.
Ayoyoyo Wololo
Diplomat can give you 10+ material in 1 move
You could think of it either as someone convincing the other side to join your cause, as the name "diplomat" would suggest, but you could also think of it as you forcefully subverting the will of the piece and taking control of it to kill who they look up to. Either pacifistic and noble, or cruel and brutal.
It can't be killed, right?
The circular board seems unnecessary to me for the core concept. I do like the idea of the queen being replaced with the diplomat, though.
This is a cool converter variant! Wish others didnt just change the game slightly...
Others can often be played with the same set though
I would argue whether the move on 1:01 makes the pawn closer to the starting point of the opposing king. It is true geometrically speaking (if you simply measure distance between cell centers with a ruler), but in the metric of the board itself the central field is closer for a pawn to its target than the one on the side: the pawn can reach the destination from the center in 3 moves, but it takes at least 4 moves (5 if you're not allowed to return to the center) from the black field on the side. So, I think it's worth mentioning in the rules that 'closer' should be understood in the purely geometrical sense here.
Any move that I think is towards the king basically
through the middle is the middle, which all 5 spaces forward are closer assuming we're going from middle of the space
"You can't touch me, Rook! One of your Pawns is in the way."
"Oh? But look behind you!"
*Rook comes barreling around the board*
Sometimes, i feel like watching videos explaining different variants of board games is better than actually playing those games
Holy crap! A new DLC for chess just dropped
Wow, cool Wololo reference
This actually seems really sick tbh
This means that in circular chess the rook or Bishop can checkmate alone if it’s in the Center of the bord
that is pretty interesting
I'm not actually good at chess but have a lot of fun playing around. A far easier way to use the diplomat would be: Take regular chess.
Replace the two pawns in the middle of each player with a diplomat. A diplomat moves one step diagonally or forward and captures like a pawn. However, a capture replaces the diplomat with the captured piece of the other color, e.g. if a black diplomat captures a white knight, after capture you take the diplomat off the board and put a black knight on its place. This diplomat of course can check the king and capture en passant or be captured en passant.
“You may suborn a piece”
I like to imagine this like:
“Did you know our king gives free sandwiches every day?”
Enemy pice: *say no more*
I want an online version of this
1:15 This rule doesn't actually seem to be true. ONLY exiting the circle at the top puts the pawn closer to the king than it was before. Exiting to the squares to the side, the way you showed, puts the pawn at the same distance it was already at when it was in the circle.
The distance u need to look out for is, to the starting squares of oposing Peaces
the whole idea of 'pawns can only move closer to the kings initial position' is hilariously poorly thought out and implemented, this entire chess variant feels kinda stupid in general honestly
@@empty5013 I honestly think the circular board idea is pretty good and interesting though the pawn movement is indeed very scuffed up, I also saw another variant with a circular board but there bishops were extremely underpowered while rooks were op, meanwhile here they are sorta on the same level just like in regular chess.
Plus the concept of the diplomat is very interesting and fun.
Now I just need a Wookie to play with ! I've heard they are great sports !
Comment about the Diplomat:
4:25 - There may be a problem with the Suborn Power not so much from game-balance but from practicality: The actual number of chess pieces that are in a set. Aside from a Queen, which is relevant only in variants like Quadular, where there are Royal Pieces besides the King and Queen that can serve the Diplomat's function, there are multiples of each chess piece in the same color. Therefore, by said practicality, the Suborn Power should have the following limit:
*A chess piece may only be Suborned if you do not have the maximum number of that chess piece on your side for the set that you are playing*
If you use a standard chess piece set with this circular setup, this provides a limit of 8 Pawns for your side, but you may Suborn your opponent's Knight, Bishop, or Rook without having yours captured first.
In most cases, the following restriction would be installed as a result of the prior rule, but should be part of the "Diplomat" ruleset in any event:
*You may not Suborn your opponent's King or Diplomat*
Suborning the opponent's _singular_ Diplomat would give a player a distinct advantage in that that play has a monopoly on the Suborn power until such time as a pawn may be promoted. If a game has multiple Diplomats, they may be Suborned.
There are 2 other rules that I would like to submit that may increase the Suborn power, one of which requires Plunder Chess:
*A Diplomat, in the process of Suborning a Pawn, may either retain the Pawn or promote the Pawn to a Knight or Bishop if there are fewer than 2 Knights/Bishops on the board in total.*
Knights and Bishops are "Minor Pieces"; no bribing a Pawn with a promotion to Radial-and-Circumferential Rook, Queen, or Diplomat.
*If playing under the Plunder Chess setting, a Diplomat, in the process of Suborning a chess piece, may Invest that chess piece with any available Vest. Said Vest must be legally available to the Suborned chess piece. Queen Vests allow the Queen's movement range; if playing a variant with both Rook and Bishop but no Queen, the Queen's vest allows both the Rook's and Bishop's movement ranges. The King's vest grants Diplomat powers instead of King's powers and may be used to Suborn instead of Capture. As the King's Vest grants Diplomat powers, it is available to all Suborned chess pieces. Since Diplomats may not Capture, nor may they be Suborned, they may not acquire Vests. If playing with the Pawn Promote variant, a Pawn may not be both Promoted and Vested when Suborned*
"King's Powers" include Succession and/or Vulnerability in addition to Movement range.
I would also allow the Diplomat to move 1 or 2 spaces in any direction on a standard or larger Chess board. A Diplomat may not capture but may "Jump" over an adjacent chess piece. Diplomats would not be subject to en passant if granted 2 spaces. The Suborning Power would still only work on adjacent chess pieces.
If, in lieu of being able to move 2 spaces under any circumstance, a Diplomat is instead granted a Pawn's doublestep, they would then be vulnerable to en passant, regardless of their direction. The doublestep may be used to move closer to the center from the outer 2 ranks or files on each side, but may only be used orthogonally, not diagonally. A diplomat must follow a doublestep with a single move before being able to doublestep again. Aside from this restriction, a Diplomat may use the doublestep as many times as they want. Again, the Suborning Power would still only work on adjacent chess pieces.
Conversely, a Diplomat should be able to Suborn a Pawn that took a doublestep in an _en passant_ manner, but only on the turn immediately following that doublestep. The Suborned Pawn is placed where the _en passant_ capture would normally occur.
How did you get this nice pieces (like royal horse or diplomat)
custom made, see description
The diplomat thus has the same function as a Yuri clone from Red Alert 2.
Got it.
it reminds me of that scene from starwars a new hope where they play some sort of board game with a board like this one
Any pieces move more crazy then a queen in normal chess, this is insanity xDDDD
I need stockfish to tell me what moves are legal and available, can't handle this game haha
Checkmate sounds so easy now. When its a King and Rook/Bishop vs Lone King, just put the Rook and he Bishop in the center and its a quick game over.
“The horse has the same movement as the knight”
Yeah, they’re the same.
Because in chess cavalry don't exist, the horses just know how to kick the enemy where it hurts to kill them, "sigma horse grindset" is what any knight in chess would tell ya when you ask them how they attack without cavalry.
I like this variant a lot more than Star Trek chess. I feel it trains better for orbital combat, especially with bishops and rook movement around the rings.
3:05 a straight line that is everything but straight
Rooks when they reach the center of the board: I can do anything!
Rooks and pawns are op in the center now
Wow, this variation is quite interesting!
Diplomat is actally the priest that goes "wololo"
I was looking for this comment
After checking out your channel, and seeing this game, I'm surprised you don't have a video explaining Dejarik (also called "holochess", the holographic chess game played in Star Wars).
I think the last part of the rules is a bit wrong. I think he meant if the same move is repeated by the same player 3 times in a row as the only move that player can take, then the game is a draw.
Is there such a thing as Hexagonal Chess? Like normal chess except the board grid is made of Hexagons instead of squares? Cuz I feel like some cool things could be done with that.
Invent it, and see if it works?
Do you know where I might get pieces to play? The ones that flip to the opposite color.
Ah yes, the HORSE.The Knight 2.0 0:18 2:19 3:48
HE CALLED THE KNIGHT A HORSE, THIS IS HISTORY
Why can the knight/horse move to the center when it is standing on the outer ring? Isn't that too far away?
Or does the center count as an adjacent field, so the knight moves technically to its left/right?
It gets a little weird how it's worded, but the center "square" is considered diagonally, beside, and immediately forward of every adjacent square. So the knight would move 2 squares twards the center, and 1 square 'into' the center, into acting as if the knight changed directions.
The pawn capture rules are a bit unclear. Let's say you are on space A, and could move to space B, but neighboring space B is space C, with a piece you could capture. From A to B gets closer to the front, but from B to C is further away. Is capturing from A to C a legal move?
Yes. If you look at the diagram drawn when explaining pawn captures, one of the lines does point back towards that player's own starting side. As long as the target piece is adjacent to both your pawn AND to a space that pawn could legally move, it can capture there.
my favorite part was when the diplomat said "it's subornin' time" and suborned all over those guys. truly one of the chess variants of all time.
Does anyone know if it's possible to play this variant online?
the chess modding scene is getting insane
I was wondering why you called it a horse.
5:15 "my rook!"
"No my rook!"
"No my rook!"
"No my rook!"
I swear, everyone else I've ever met says that En Passant isn't a move, and i just have to shake my head at them.
0:18 wasnt it knight?
It's the same as chess except if you change 90% of the rules
Diplomats? Nice!
Where did you get all those chess discs? I want a set of em'
The horse is called the knight
So basically, if you get a rook or bishop to the center, the opposing king is screwed unless they can hide behind another piece, or the rook gets captured
What are these pieces. I see him use them in every chess video, but cant find them online anywhere
How many videos about chess variants does he have???
Comment about the board:
That center area is very large; large enough for 6 chess pieces, 3 to a side. There are 2 ways this could be addressed:
Option 1: When the Center Space is occupied only by the Player's chess pieces, then said Player may land on or pass through that space as though it was unoccupied. When chess pieces controlled by the Opponent are in the Center Space, they block the space. A player may Capture their choice of ONE of the Opponent's chess pieces within the Center Space; likewise, a Diplomat may Suborn only one of the Opponent's chess pieces in the Center Space. The Center Space may be occupied by chess pieces of both sides. A chess piece currently in the Center Space may not Capture an Opponent's chess piece within the Center Space; they must first leave the Center Space then legally reenter on a future turn. A Diplomat in the Center Space may Suborn an Opponent's chess piece within the Center Space.
Option 2: Break the Center into 6 Spaces, 3 on each side. Both of the spaces in-line with the center 3 files are colored Yellow; the spaces immediately clockwise form the yellow spaces are colored Red and the spaces counter-clockwise from the yellow spaces are colored Blue. Center Spaces are Orthogonally adjacent to the 2 spaces behind/outside of it (3 spaces for Yellow spaces), the same color space on the opposite side, and the center spaces immediately clockwise and counter-clockwise of it. Center Spaces are diagonally adjacent to the 2/3 spaces behind/outside of it, the 2 spaces in the inner ring immediately adjacent to those, and the 2 Center Spaces that are not orthogonally adjacent to the space in question.
I think that I would prefer Option 2, though I'm still trying to process how it would impact the Bishop.
5:18 or “...is repeated five times...”
Stating the pawn movement rule as 'closer to the starting space of the enemy king' kinda works intuitively, but is a bit ambiguous because there are multiple paths forward, so distance to a space is not well defined. If you take it to mean _shortest_ distance then the rule doesn't work as stated (any move not towards center at best leaves shortest distance the same, and some moves from center increase shortest distance). However, if "closer" means "reduce _maximum_ (forward) distance" then this rule may work still...
He specifically noted that a pawn needn’t take the shortest line to the king, just that it has to get closer to the king than it was before its move
"Suborn"? You couldn't call it "convert" or "convince" or something?
0:13 Bros Cloning Pawns 💀☠️
How to get this font for your unicode chess pieces on chess discs?
POV: you are about to mate but your opponent starts driving his rook in a circle till the clock runs zero
Bishop op when in the center
"No I want it"
"No I want it"
"No I want it"
"No I want it"
So the holy sword/the rook and bushop is op
This game uses a dart board as a game board?
Interessant
Ja, das 'diplomat' macht es sehr interessant.
This is like a smaller version of Byzantine chess without the Queen.
does the king move?
Yes. It moves just like a normal chess king.
When it goes into the circle,
It can go anywhere in the first inner circle.
Intresting
ha typo
and you fixed it
@@tobemutationfox7357 so?
guess he/she wants to first
Here's how notated:
Diplomat: D
Conversion: (piece)b-w or (piece)w-b
Pawn move: up-one
Anish should try this
Please do
Tamerlane chess
Atomic chess
Fog of war chess
Couldn't diplomat chess be played in a normal board? Just keep all normal rules and substitute the queen by the diplomat
The diplomat piece would be kinda broken in normal chess ngl. You effectively double the value of every capture it makes at the cost of no queen. This thing could control space with pawns like it's nothing
I heavilly doubt it would be broken, its movement being the same as the king would make it slow AF and just as easy (if not easier) to capture as the king, though if it did get into the range of an enamy piece it could give you an advantage by converting, you likely won't ever convert a rook or bishop to your side, maybe a knight if your lucky, and the dream of a suborned pawn promoting just makes the diplomat's mouth water at the thought although it would probably never happen.
where do you get the circular chess pieces?
The pawns just get upgraded
let’s just accept it: Chess, but everything is op.
And when everything is OP...
@@irok1 ?
@@Greggorto it's a variation on the quote from the Incredibles, "and when everyone is super, no one will be..." To "and when everything is OP, nothing will be."
@@Immediately_ I’m gonna put this as a note for other comments: I have never watched the Incredibles 1
Patiently waiting for shogi chess in which you can summon your enemy's captured pieces on your side.
5:09
RUclips: *Uploaded 8 days ago*
Me: Huh... Wait
Looks bizarre but kinda cool
If the game has no queen then why is there a queen piece?
bishop can change color
I'm shocked. At the start of the video, he called the knight a horse
I was planning on playing this, but you said there’s no en passant