The M50 is beginner friendly. I've been shooting for years but I didn't want to lug around my DSLR rig for on the go daily driven random photography. Picked up the M50 Mark II and I was really impressed with the little guy.
In my opinion, the M50 is the way to go for beginners. If you are a beginner and dont know if you will continue and upgrade, get a discounted M50 for about $450 and buy EF lenses and use a speedbooster or adapter. If you know you will shoot seriously for the foreseeable future, either start with the R50 or save up and invest in a higher end R line camera or Sony. The way I see these cameras is as a very advanced mirrorsless line of the Rebels. Not really good enough for high end professionals, but commonly too expensive for beginners.
ive seen the r50 in person, its actually far more beginner friendly, the m50 id say is more of a if-you-can-do-without-autofocus, because it has virtually no autofocus at 4k and the m50 ultimately was made to be used without autofocus, the m50 is very purpose built, its obvious it was geared torward beginners but also that it has quite good cinematic quality too if you can do manual focus which most beginners cant do.
Wouldn't the better thing to do would be to get the r50 for future upgrading, or if it's not for you, there's a better resale value? Can you also buy an adapter to use other lenses on the r series as well?
After watching all the comparison videos i bought the m50 mk2 for 600 with canon bag included through canons website. After learning of the r50's shortcomings versus the R8 if and when i get into the RF mount cameras it will be Full frame with more features than the R50. I got the m50 to compliment my pentax k70 and the autofucus on the m50 smashes the pentax to bits. The extra 200 went into another lense or the cage /rig accessories
You forgot to mention that the EF-M has been discontinued and virtually has no upgrade path, if you invest on an R50 and RF lenses you have PLENTY to upgrade to, like the R5 or even the Eos R RP.
But it's a pricy future since Canon is against 3rd paery manufacturing. I have the M50, a Sigma 16mm F1.4, a Rokinon 12mm F2 and a 7 Artisans macro lens, i believe only the macro lens is available for RF mount, the other 2 lenses are great but the 1.4 is amazing, so for now, there are much much better options for the M mount, it's sad that the RF mount lacks APSC lenses, specially since Canon can't output enough with decent quality for the price.
@@zonaboba what lens is the RF mount lacking? For like 99% of users the mount is mature enough, and they’re just like 20% pricier but the optics are also better so it’s a no brainer in my opinion
@@blackLink123 what i talking about is canon m50 efm.. i said efm have complete lens already bcoz they older, previous generation event though discontinue..
Hey, can i ask which camera did you end up buying, if you had already bought one, and how do you like it? I’m looking for a camera mainly the same purposes, so it would help a lot!!
@@alexakratofil Hey Alexa I ended up getting the r50 It was more expensive but I thought that I should go ahead and get the newest that canon had to offer. Since the r50 beats m50 in every category except lenses in my opinion. which in that case it seems to be that they are stopping production on EF lenses and only creating RF. it seemed like the logical purchase as it looks like this and other canon cameras would be getting significant attention. Since this is my first camera I also think It just made more sense for me to get the r50 and grow as the camera grows and gets more attention from canon through lenses and accessories. Overall I love it! The content I'm making looks so much better I'm actually happy putting out the stuff I make now. Id say save up and cop the r50 you wont be disappointed. I hope this helped bro! good luck with the music!
i'm staying with m50 cause there are cheaper native lenses and the camera body is almost same... for me i would rather have bigger selection of vide variety of lenses then to have 1 better lens which is 2-3time more expensive
I had the M50m2 for 3 years now, bought prime lenses (16mm and 30mm) and a efm-ef converter thingy. For me it's more than enough for social media stuff and it's more than capable of producing semi-pro looking photos thanks to the prime lenses. Maybe I'd still use this camera for the next 2 years...
So I’m new to all this and decided that the R50 is for me. What memory cards do they hold and what size is advisable? Great video this. Cheers for making up my mind
M series is discontinued, so its a orphaned system. On the other hand, you may be able to find bargains when the vendors start dumping their inventories, and users start selling them to move on to R series or another system.
Recently have been getting back into photography and came across your page. GREAT detailed review of each. I was on the fence between these two and the SL3 but after this review R50 all the way, subscribed. Keep up the awesome work my friend.
I've had the m50 mk 2 for 2 years using a speedbooster, 50mm 1.8 , and 70-200mm 2.8 lens. It does me wonder, I'd say. I got it mainly for the compactness. I'm not sure if i should upgrade. i know that's up to me to decide. Just want something good for dark/astro photography
Hi, I've watched many of your videos - they're detailed and very well produced and I'm an excited subscriber! Thanks for providing this information! Could I ask you a question - I just want a good quality camera to shoot videos of me performing (I'm a musician) in mainly outdoor areas like city streets. I've been told the m50 is perfect, but the enhanced 4K features on the R50 are compelling. What do you think? What would you advise me? I noted that you said the enhanced 4K also has downsides such as taking up more storage etc - but as you also said, 4K is probably the way to go these days, and is the future. For street performances, which would you go for?
Hey I'm an art student interested in architecture and street photography who mostly takes photos on their phone looking for a camera which can allow me to edit better, I've already used lightroom for my mobile shots but just interested in buying a camera. Is the m50 worth it if I'm able to get it with the kit lens and an additional lens or should i pay more for the r50?
Probably you already have a camera, and any modern camera is quite capable, but for architecture a Canon R7 would be better, it has an Automatic Leveling mode that rotates the sensor so everything gets properly leveled. It is more expensive than the models you mention.
How's canon r50 comparing with sony a6100?? Is sony a6100 worth buying in 2023? Or should I go for canon r50 or m50 mark ii? Help me to choose my first camera! Mainly want a entry level budget mirrorless camera for both photography and videography.
I would like to get one of these two cameras for videography and filmmaking, which one would you recommend?? I'm a little undecided even after watching the video :(
The resolution scaling and color ranges are much better on the r50, I'd say between these two it's a safe choice. If you ever end up disliking it it holds up well on the second-hand market and you could easily get your money back!
I have been shooting real estate with the M50 and Laowa 9mm f/2.8 for over a year now. The Laowa is a powerhouse of a lens shooting real estate. It's 13.5mm full frame equivalent, and the 4k is actually usable, although I rarely have clients requesting it. But still nice to know the 4k is there when I need it. However, it's obviously inferior to the R50 and Laowa has the 9mm f/2.8 available in the RF mount. This will be a tremendous upgrade. As you mentioned, the RF lenses are much sharper and overall, just a superior lens. I have my photos and videos edited by a professional, but with the R50's advanced technology of bracketing several photos with an immediate image is very impressive, and will definitely compare this with what comes back from my editor. Additionally, the R50's low light capability is superior despite having the same sensor. Great for photos and getting the most hdr for videos. I have homes with poor natural light and occasionally have to shoot them on cloudy days. This is where the M50 really shows its limitations. However, I recently discovered an amazing custom picture profile that has helped greatly with getting the best hdr, virtually eliminating to greatly reducing blown out windows. This profile has improved the hdr, sharpness and saturation giving these real estate videos that much needed pop. But, while it's a vast improvement for this camera, it doesn't compare to the R50, not even close. This is the best comparison video I've seen on these two very capable cameras. Concise and articulate. 👍📷
@@chloebai1366 I ended up getting the Nisi 9mm f2.8 RF lens, much better than the Laowa 9mm f2.8, I highly recommend the Nisi over the Laowa for the same reason I prefer the Canon R50 over the M50, it's just better in every way.
I just bought the Cannon R50, I was actually comparing it to the Rebel T7, I found out about the M50 later (I'm a newbie to photography). I'm glad I decided to go ahead and pay a little more for the R50, even though both cameras (R50/M50) are similar to me, it was the fact that the M series is discontinued and the R50 just dropped last year that made sense to me to go ahead and purchase the new one. I know I wouldn't be able to afford another camera for at least a few years, so why settle and have regrets over a couple hundred dollars. From what I have researched the R50 is a better camera in several areas and that's enough for me to spend a tad more for a better experience overall.
I do car reviews. I am very new to camera's as i have been using a gopro for my videos Which of these would be better for me? Does anyone know?. Thanks
But what about that R50 kit lens? Is it kinda mediocre, even for a kit lens? I am on the fence here. I feel most people will never have more than the kit lens, so that is kind of important.
"Faster" and "Better" was quite redundant throughout the segment....especially when discussing 4K. The decision making comes down to cost.....deciding if you prefer an older version vs a newer version.
I was leaning more towards the r50 for video, but then I looked at the prices for the rf and ef lenses, and since I am a beginner with these types of cameras and I don't have much money I'll probably stick with the m50 or something similar and its much cheaper lenses.
i do wanna correct your statement on color for the cameras, it has 8 bit color specifically in jpeg file formats, it has 14 bit in RAW, while the r50 has 10 bit in both jpeg and RAW, making the m50 actually better if you use raw, but beginners dont use raw.
I cant believe I let myself get scammed into buying the M50. I even bought lenses for it because its been 3 years. I wish I didn't, and Im fucking mad everyone on RUclips recommended it and then said "Dont buy it" after the fucking check from Canon cleared
The R10 is about the same price as the R50 right now on Amazon. $1200 for the R10 vs $1050 for the R50. Which would you recommend? Then I watched your other video, so now I'm torn between the Cannons or the Nikon Z30. 😞 Help!
@@asgelwkyi This is not satire, there are digital cameras, the quality of which is worse than the camera of Samsumag s23, as someone who is learning to understand the world of photography, I asked someone professional to give me an answer on the subject. :)
Honestly, as a parent whose kid is jumping into this photography world, I had the same question. I don't want to buy a camera that is "worse" than his Samsung. Not a dumb question at all! 😊
Hello, brother! I'm in search of a good camera for my RUclips channel. My budget is around 20-25k. If you have any recommended products or if you're selling a reviewed camera, please inform me. Thanks!
R50 does not support 3rd party lenses AND Flashes. you end up paying a fortune if you want fast lenses. Both of Them can use seamesly EF and EF-S DSLR lenses with the correct adapter.
@@TechThroughTheLens I understand many prefer prime lenses, but it's a shame the lack of constant aperture apsc zoom lenses for the RF mount. That Said RF 35 F1.8 would be my prime option.
What the heck do you mean by saying the M mount has a wider variety of lenses?!?!? Are you on bad drugs?!? The M mount is an orphan with only 6 (or 8?) native lens from Canon, there are over 30 now for the RF mount. The M mount bodies are the absolute worst choice anyone could make today even for a used body! Yes, you can use EF/EF-S glass on the M50, but those same lenses can also be used on the R50. Five years ago the M50 was a good choice, but that was before we found out that Canon has abandoned the M mount. It is completely idiotic to buy an M mount camera today if you want to go mirrorless. I can't believe that you would tell anyone to do that today.
the m6mk2 is the only real decent m mount camera. 4k30 uncropped with dpaf, with 32mp, paired with sigma f1.4 lenses, its really the only M mount camera id buy
At the time he shot the video there were like 2 okay-ish RF-S lenses for the R50 and 8 very very nice EF-M lenses fitting the M50 mk2. I think these camera's are bought for AND WITH these kind of lenses and mostly NOT for the $3000 EF/RF glass out there, so your whole reasoning is moot at best. Comming from a guy who is definitely going to hit an R50 at black friday.
@@KevinNordstrom until you realize almost every crop sensor lenses from canon will underperform with such resolution. Just look at videos from Cristopher Frost testing them.
If anyone wants to buy a perfect like new condition m50 Camera with 18-150 3.5-6.5 is stm (400 dollar lense ) And 22mm f2 stm (250 dollar lense ) With 2 canon batteries (120 dollar value) For 900, Lmk. Looking to change setup .
un true. It has worse optics and its only slightly cheaper but misses alot of features in both photo video and autofocus. youre saving 100 dolars for a way worse camera
@@TechThroughTheLensI don't agree, I used the r50 in a shop and compared to my m6 mk2 it seems all plastic with my m6 mk2 I have the 11-22 efm and the 55 200 efm find me two similar lenses with a similar price. For now I don't see small, light and valid lenses in the r series
I found Canon Design is always the same BORING, Blank and TOO Conservative Nothing change ever since DSLR era. I Owned 30D and 5DMKII back then before switching... I have to admit I like Canon Color Science and skin tone. But They should make Retro style if they want to compete with Fujifilm, Nikon Zf.
The viewfinders resolution is the same as well as the magnification last time i checked like .. everywhere. They don't have the same sensor. The sensor in the R50 is the same as the one in the R10 and that is techically spoken a new sensor compared to M50 mk2 etc, but probably very comparable, this all is just peanuts .. . The big difference however is the Digic X and its auto modes / speed and 4K performance. I do not own other Canon M gear so for me and IMHO anyway, it is a TOTAL NO-BRAINER to go for the R50.
Hey TTTL.... Do I get a prize if I comment on your spelling mistake @4:12 ?????? Olivia Newton-John would be so upset :( . (How about donating the R50 and changing my life :) ! )
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
⭐Canon R50
→US Price - amzn.to/3XY1kYl
→UK Price - amzn.to/4eBYEVW
→CA Price - amzn.to/4gJk6dE
⭐Canon M50 Mark II
→US Price - amzn.to/4gDW6bE
→UK Price - amzn.to/3Xzq1ck
→CA Price - amzn.to/47JBkDt
The M50 is beginner friendly. I've been shooting for years but I didn't want to lug around my DSLR rig for on the go daily driven random photography. Picked up the M50 Mark II and I was really impressed with the little guy.
In my opinion, the M50 is the way to go for beginners. If you are a beginner and dont know if you will continue and upgrade, get a discounted M50 for about $450 and buy EF lenses and use a speedbooster or adapter. If you know you will shoot seriously for the foreseeable future, either start with the R50 or save up and invest in a higher end R line camera or Sony. The way I see these cameras is as a very advanced mirrorsless line of the Rebels. Not really good enough for high end professionals, but commonly too expensive for beginners.
what about the affordable R100, is it good?
ive seen the r50 in person, its actually far more beginner friendly, the m50 id say is more of a if-you-can-do-without-autofocus, because it has virtually no autofocus at 4k and the m50 ultimately was made to be used without autofocus, the m50 is very purpose built, its obvious it was geared torward beginners but also that it has quite good cinematic quality too if you can do manual focus which most beginners cant do.
@@piahelensNope, the display is a massive drawback.
Neither of these are for beginners, use a G7x and go play with the manual settings.
Wouldn't the better thing to do would be to get the r50 for future upgrading, or if it's not for you, there's a better resale value?
Can you also buy an adapter to use other lenses on the r series as well?
After watching all the comparison videos i bought the m50 mk2 for 600 with canon bag included through canons website. After learning of the r50's shortcomings versus the R8 if and when i get into the RF mount cameras it will be Full frame with more features than the R50. I got the m50 to compliment my pentax k70 and the autofucus on the m50 smashes the pentax to bits. The extra 200 went into another lense or the cage /rig accessories
Hey, Can i get canon website please?
You forgot to mention that the EF-M has been discontinued and virtually has no upgrade path, if you invest on an R50 and RF lenses you have PLENTY to upgrade to, like the R5 or even the Eos R RP.
But it's a pricy future since Canon is against 3rd paery manufacturing.
I have the M50, a Sigma 16mm F1.4, a Rokinon 12mm F2 and a 7 Artisans macro lens, i believe only the macro lens is available for RF mount, the other 2 lenses are great but the 1.4 is amazing, so for now, there are much much better options for the M mount, it's sad that the RF mount lacks APSC lenses, specially since Canon can't output enough with decent quality for the price.
m50 have complete variety lens already dude
@@zonaboba what lens is the RF mount lacking? For like 99% of users the mount is mature enough, and they’re just like 20% pricier but the optics are also better so it’s a no brainer in my opinion
@@blackLink123 what i talking about is canon m50 efm.. i said efm have complete lens already bcoz they older, previous generation event though discontinue..
I'm a beginner. I am a Hip hop artist and I want to start shooting my own videos. This video has helped me immensely thank you!
Hey, can i ask which camera did you end up buying, if you had already bought one, and how do you like it? I’m looking for a camera mainly the same purposes, so it would help a lot!!
@@alexakratofil Hey Alexa I ended up getting the r50 It was more expensive but I thought that I should go ahead and get the newest that canon had to offer. Since the r50 beats m50 in every category except lenses in my opinion. which in that case it seems to be that they are stopping production on EF lenses and only creating RF. it seemed like the logical purchase as it looks like this and other canon cameras would be getting significant attention. Since this is my first camera I also think It just made more sense for me to get the r50 and grow as the camera grows and gets more attention from canon through lenses and accessories. Overall I love it! The content I'm making looks so much better I'm actually happy putting out the stuff I make now. Id say save up and cop the r50 you wont be disappointed. I hope this helped bro! good luck with the music!
@@2phase965 any update please on how it’s worked out for you .. looking to buy one for my videos too
i'm staying with m50 cause there are cheaper native lenses and the camera body is almost same... for me i would rather have bigger selection of vide variety of lenses then to have 1 better lens which is 2-3time more expensive
I had the M50m2 for 3 years now, bought prime lenses (16mm and 30mm) and a efm-ef converter thingy. For me it's more than enough for social media stuff and it's more than capable of producing semi-pro looking photos thanks to the prime lenses. Maybe I'd still use this camera for the next 2 years...
So I’m new to all this and decided that the R50 is for me. What memory cards do they hold and what size is advisable? Great video this. Cheers for making up my mind
M series is discontinued, so its a orphaned system. On the other hand, you may be able to find bargains when the vendors start dumping their inventories, and users start selling them to move on to R series or another system.
Recently have been getting back into photography and came across your page. GREAT detailed review of each. I was on the fence between these two and the SL3 but after this review R50 all the way, subscribed. Keep up the awesome work my friend.
Awesome, thank you! Happy to help and serve the camera community
I've had the m50 mk 2 for 2 years using a speedbooster, 50mm 1.8 , and 70-200mm 2.8 lens. It does me wonder, I'd say. I got it mainly for the compactness. I'm not sure if i should upgrade. i know that's up to me to decide. Just want something good for dark/astro photography
You might want to consider aCanon rp witht he full frame. and if you sell the m50 it won't be too expensive
What camera do u use
Could I have a kind of fullframe with an r50 and some lenses?
Hi, I've watched many of your videos - they're detailed and very well produced and I'm an excited subscriber! Thanks for providing this information! Could I ask you a question - I just want a good quality camera to shoot videos of me performing (I'm a musician) in mainly outdoor areas like city streets. I've been told the m50 is perfect, but the enhanced 4K features on the R50 are compelling. What do you think? What would you advise me? I noted that you said the enhanced 4K also has downsides such as taking up more storage etc - but as you also said, 4K is probably the way to go these days, and is the future. For street performances, which would you go for?
Hi!! Thanks for the info. Can I use and adapter on R50 and use old lens in R50 ?
Hey I'm an art student interested in architecture and street photography who mostly takes photos on their phone looking for a camera which can allow me to edit better, I've already used lightroom for my mobile shots but just interested in buying a camera. Is the m50 worth it if I'm able to get it with the kit lens and an additional lens or should i pay more for the r50?
Probably you already have a camera, and any modern camera is quite capable, but for architecture a Canon R7 would be better, it has an Automatic Leveling mode that rotates the sensor so everything gets properly leveled. It is more expensive than the models you mention.
@@ReinoldFZwhat camera would be good for pictures of wildlife ?
09:26 The R50 isn't $100 more than the M50---its $200 more.
Such a great video! Do you have something about Sony ZV E10?
Bro which mic are you using?
please boost up your volume bro,
thnx for the note. will do
Where was this filmed? What is the architectural monument
at 3:04, 7:14 and 8:55? Thank you for sharing!
The Great Library at the Law Society of Ontario, in Toronto, Canada.
Tank you for your answer!
Hey,im a student. I want ro do 70% outdoor videography 20% indoor videography and 10% photography. What should i go for?R50 or M50? Or op3?
How's canon r50 comparing with sony a6100??
Is sony a6100 worth buying in 2023?
Or should I go for canon r50 or m50 mark ii?
Help me to choose my first camera!
Mainly want a entry level budget mirrorless camera for both photography and videography.
I'm trying to see the exact same thing! So far I haven't seen the greatest reviews on A6000-A6300
Recomiendo de sony apartir de la a6400 en adelante es mejor.
I would like to get one of these two cameras for videography and filmmaking, which one would you recommend?? I'm a little undecided even after watching the video :(
Literally same
The resolution scaling and color ranges are much better on the r50, I'd say between these two it's a safe choice. If you ever end up disliking it it holds up well on the second-hand market and you could easily get your money back!
I have been shooting real estate with the M50 and Laowa 9mm f/2.8 for over a year now. The Laowa is a powerhouse of a lens shooting real estate. It's 13.5mm full frame equivalent, and the 4k is actually usable, although I rarely have clients requesting it. But still nice to know the 4k is there when I need it. However, it's obviously inferior to the R50 and Laowa has the 9mm f/2.8 available in the RF mount. This will be a tremendous upgrade. As you mentioned, the RF lenses are much sharper and overall, just a superior lens.
I have my photos and videos edited by a professional, but with the R50's advanced technology of bracketing several photos with an immediate image is very impressive, and will definitely compare this with what comes back from my editor.
Additionally, the R50's low light capability is superior despite having the same sensor. Great for photos and getting the most hdr for videos. I have homes with poor natural light and occasionally have to shoot them on cloudy days. This is where the M50 really shows its limitations. However, I recently discovered an amazing custom picture profile that has helped greatly with getting the best hdr, virtually eliminating to greatly reducing blown out windows. This profile has improved the hdr, sharpness and saturation giving these real estate videos that much needed pop.
But, while it's a vast improvement for this camera, it doesn't compare to the R50, not even close.
This is the best comparison video I've seen on these two very capable cameras. Concise and articulate. 👍📷
Thank u for sharing! really helpful❤
@@chloebai1366 I ended up getting the Nisi 9mm f2.8 RF lens, much better than the Laowa 9mm f2.8, I highly recommend the Nisi over the Laowa for the same reason I prefer the Canon R50 over the M50, it's just better in every way.
Can I use my older canon lenses on the R50?
It they're EF or EF-S you can use the adapter. EF-M lenses cannot.
It can
Out of these two which one is good for wildlife photography?
R50
I just bought the Cannon R50, I was actually comparing it to the Rebel T7, I found out about the M50 later (I'm a newbie to photography). I'm glad I decided to go ahead and pay a little more for the R50, even though both cameras (R50/M50) are similar to me, it was the fact that the M series is discontinued and the R50 just dropped last year that made sense to me to go ahead and purchase the new one. I know I wouldn't be able to afford another camera for at least a few years, so why settle and have regrets over a couple hundred dollars. From what I have researched the R50 is a better camera in several areas and that's enough for me to spend a tad more for a better experience overall.
What about autofocus during 4K video shoot?
Thank you for sharing.
Very helpful, thank you.
I do car reviews.
I am very new to camera's as i have been using a gopro for my videos
Which of these would be better for me? Does anyone know?.
Thanks
I would get the r50 with a 16mm and 35mm lens. Thank me later
Helpful video.😊
If you choose the R50 you can also get an adapter to use the older EF lenses that the M50 uses. 😊
it’s the old ef lenses . the m50 uses eos m . different lenses
@@TechThroughTheLens I can not use my lenses from rebel t6 cameras on R50?
@@srijonisaha9017Yes you can. You’ll need the EF to RF adapter.
@@mikeodowd100 Thank you so much.
Does it carry over autofocus capabilities with the adapter?
But what about that R50 kit lens? Is it kinda mediocre, even for a kit lens? I am on the fence here. I feel most people will never have more than the kit lens, so that is kind of important.
"Faster" and "Better" was quite redundant throughout the segment....especially when discussing 4K. The decision making comes down to cost.....deciding if you prefer an older version vs a newer version.
Thank you, nice review.
They do not actually share the same sensor the r50 is a newer one with a new processor
I was leaning more towards the r50 for video, but then I looked at the prices for the rf and ef lenses, and since I am a beginner with these types of cameras and I don't have much money I'll probably stick with the m50 or something similar and its much cheaper lenses.
Great information
Which is better for just photography?
If only there was a video that discusses it
filming on a $300 camera rn. hopefully I get an r50 eventually
I'm filming 14 bit RAW on a $150 camera that's 11 years old.
this is a bit of a more professional thing to say but if you really need other lenses just use some adapters. their expensive but a life saver.
Of course the R50 is better✔️
Great video as always, River.
Right on!
i do wanna correct your statement on color for the cameras, it has 8 bit color specifically in jpeg file formats, it has 14 bit in RAW, while the r50 has 10 bit in both jpeg and RAW, making the m50 actually better if you use raw, but beginners dont use raw.
I cant believe I let myself get scammed into buying the M50. I even bought lenses for it because its been 3 years.
I wish I didn't, and Im fucking mad everyone on RUclips recommended it and then said "Dont buy it" after the fucking check from Canon cleared
For the price of the RF lenses ill rather go buy a full frame sensor camera... Or any sony that does uncropped 4k or 1080p 120fps
now that Canon have discontinued the "M" series, I guess the better one is the "R" series?
The R50 is the M50 Mark III in RF terms
Let me ask you something after taking photos RUclips Can you earn money at?
The R10 is about the same price as the R50 right now on Amazon. $1200 for the R10 vs $1050 for the R50. Which would you recommend? Then I watched your other video, so now I'm torn between the Cannons or the Nikon Z30. 😞 Help!
R50 body is only $670 on Amazon
@@miata350 Not in Canada. My prices quoted above are from Amazon Canada.
tu a raison au canada amazon jamais de rabais.@@trvlr002
Which camera is better, the Canon EOS R50 or Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra ?
i have 23 ultra and it sucks. video is grainy
I hope this question is a satire
@@asgelwkyi This is not satire, there are digital cameras, the quality of which is worse than the camera of Samsumag s23, as someone who is learning to understand the world of photography, I asked someone professional to give me an answer on the subject. :)
depends on which lens you put on the r50@@yakove147
Honestly, as a parent whose kid is jumping into this photography world, I had the same question. I don't want to buy a camera that is "worse" than his Samsung. Not a dumb question at all! 😊
R these good for photography photos?
Did you not just watch the video>???
@@xk4l1br3
I really wonder
nice man
Amazon had the white R50 for $640, so I got it to try.
How’d it go?
Great video! R50 or R10?
r10 if you have the budget. its better in every way
Hello, brother! I'm in search of a good camera for my RUclips channel. My budget is around 20-25k. If you have any recommended products or if you're selling a reviewed camera, please inform me. Thanks!
What about the r50 battery ? The one on m50 sucks
It’s a better than the M50, but only by a little bit
Superb
Please compare Canon r50 vs Sony zv e10
the r50 is better. but i have a video on my channel comparing them.
You sold another R50 :D Thanks
R50 does not support 3rd party lenses AND Flashes. you end up paying a fortune if you want fast lenses. Both of Them can use seamesly EF and EF-S DSLR lenses with the correct adapter.
the black rf stm lenses are all only a few hundered. but i agree i wish it has third part y support
@@TechThroughTheLens I understand many prefer prime lenses, but it's a shame the lack of constant aperture apsc zoom lenses for the RF mount. That Said RF 35 F1.8 would be my prime option.
I have had the M50 for 4 years only used it 4 times so honestly don't know 😅
Looks like u don't need it much.. Wanna send it over?.. 😉😊
@@reflexsoundzwas about to say the same thing 😭😫
What the heck do you mean by saying the M mount has a wider variety of lenses?!?!? Are you on bad drugs?!? The M mount is an orphan with only 6 (or 8?) native lens from Canon, there are over 30 now for the RF mount. The M mount bodies are the absolute worst choice anyone could make today even for a used body! Yes, you can use EF/EF-S glass on the M50, but those same lenses can also be used on the R50. Five years ago the M50 was a good choice, but that was before we found out that Canon has abandoned the M mount. It is completely idiotic to buy an M mount camera today if you want to go mirrorless. I can't believe that you would tell anyone to do that today.
the m6mk2 is the only real decent m mount camera. 4k30 uncropped with dpaf, with 32mp, paired with sigma f1.4 lenses, its really the only M mount camera id buy
At the time he shot the video there were like 2 okay-ish RF-S lenses for the R50 and 8 very very nice EF-M lenses fitting the M50 mk2. I think these camera's are bought for AND WITH these kind of lenses and mostly NOT for the $3000 EF/RF glass out there, so your whole reasoning is moot at best. Comming from a guy who is definitely going to hit an R50 at black friday.
@@KevinNordstrom until you realize almost every crop sensor lenses from canon will underperform with such resolution. Just look at videos from Cristopher Frost testing them.
If anyone wants to buy a perfect like new condition
m50 Camera
with 18-150 3.5-6.5 is stm (400 dollar lense )
And 22mm f2 stm (250 dollar lense )
With 2 canon batteries (120 dollar value)
For 900,
Lmk.
Looking to change setup .
Hey are you still selling that camera ?
I got the R50 with kit lens for $604 including taxes.
I'm going to buy r50 it's going to be my first camera ❤
Wow bro i wish you are gonna be an insane photographer. Sorry for my bad English
I just bought one … so far so good
How did it turn out!? Would like to hear your experience.
Tell us about your experience, I 'm gonna get that one as well, pls reply. TIA
I'm curious too
The Canon M50 has the same sensor, better construction and less expensive but better optics
un true. It has worse optics and its only slightly cheaper but misses alot of features in both photo video and autofocus. youre saving 100 dolars for a way worse camera
@@TechThroughTheLensI don't agree, I used the r50 in a shop and compared to my m6 mk2 it seems all plastic with my m6 mk2 I have the 11-22 efm and the 55 200 efm find me two similar lenses with a similar price. For now I don't see small, light and valid lenses in the r series
R50 all day!
Agreed but its $200 extra, might be not a problem when one doesnt have loads of M lenses!
I found Canon Design is always the same BORING, Blank and TOO Conservative Nothing change ever since DSLR era. I Owned 30D and 5DMKII back then before switching... I have to admit I like Canon Color Science and skin tone. But They should make Retro style if they want to compete with Fujifilm, Nikon Zf.
800 - 600 = 200, not 100. Its 200 dollars more.
theu did another price drop . my info was slightly off . I apologize
R50 is going to sell the way M50 did.
In my country R50 is so expensive you can think directly to the upper range.
hey man , your audio gain is low.... a video with bad audio never gives a good experience. just compare the volume with any other good video
The viewfinders resolution is the same as well as the magnification last time i checked like .. everywhere. They don't have the same sensor. The sensor in the R50 is the same as the one in the R10 and that is techically spoken a new sensor compared to M50 mk2 etc, but probably very comparable, this all is just peanuts .. . The big difference however is the Digic X and its auto modes / speed and 4K performance. I do not own other Canon M gear so for me and IMHO anyway, it is a TOTAL NO-BRAINER to go for the R50.
Hey TTTL.... Do I get a prize if I comment on your spelling mistake @4:12 ?????? Olivia Newton-John would be so upset :( . (How about donating the R50 and changing my life :) ! )
M50 ALL THE WAY
I wasted my money on m2 and lenses…smh
Legenda rapida....
None. Dont waste money on any of these and thank me later.
M50 win without even war
Win at what?
@@todanrg3 price (200$ cheaper)
@@lucabastianello9830 That won't make it better, only cheaper. The M50 can't even do proper 4K.
@@todanrg3 neither the R50 with all that handshaking stabilizer
True, R50 4k garbage