The gyro question was difficult only because I have never seen that form of schematic symbol. The problem with the autoland question is that it does not state whether the autoland system is fail-passive or fail-operational. This changes the answer because fail-passive requires visual reference to continue but fail-operational will continue the landing (With exceptions for a small number of memory item failures of the core autoland system.).
For the second question I took the „donkey bridge“ - ECTM + for climb and + ECTM - for decend from the comments, this also takes the EAS into account. When you get a question like this, you just crossout the speed that is constant and the other speeds behave according to + or -. For example you climb with constant TAS: -ECxM+. EAS and CAS decrease, while Mach Number inscreases. Thank you for your effort guys, you‘re doing a great job with your explanations and informing videos. Auf gut Deutsch gesagt, Joe und Fabi ihr seid absolute Ehrenmänner und auch sonst liebe ich Joe‘s Videos
Question 1: actually, the nose of the plane is to the right of the AoA sensor. The sensor is installed on the left side of the plane, therefore left of the nose.
Amazing video! I might consider doing my ATPLs in the future so this really helps. Keep these videos coming please. Great content and explanation. Keep it up!
Didn't know how to read the scematic for the gyros, but must admit, that there is a nice logic to your "missing axis" argument. I.e. assuming the 'thick' axis measures torque, we know which two axes won't register a reading (the spin axis because any rotation there just feels like a slight spin speed change to the gyro, and the measurement axis because of precession).
@2:00 “Aerodynamically shaped” Sorry but I object to the use of the phrase “pretty obvious” with regard to the pointy end is the one that’s going to face into the wind, given that wings, which AOAs are frequently compared to, have their thick ends facing the wind and not their pointy ends.
Even in that case the leading edge of the wing still faces the wind with the thinner part. The thicker part is far behind. If you picture a triangular object facing the wind, which way would you consider it "aerodynamically shaped"?
@@dimitris2521 Sorry no, the thickest part of the wing is almost always the leading edge because it induces the airflow to race over the top of it as moves toward the trailing edge so it can produce downwash. Having the pointy end head first would not be aerodynamic in terms of a wing. If it were compared to the nose of aircraft however I'd be inclined to call it "aerodynamically shaped" since the thinnest part faces the wind and it thickens out as you move back.
@@filthywings353 He never implied that the triangular object is wing-shaped, just aerodynamically shaped, which it is. You made the comparison with a wing and I noted that even in that context the leading edge of the wing still does not introduce the thicker part right away but has a thinner part in front which is in fact aerodynamically shaped. Then, because it's a wing and not a "windex" to just point itself into the wind, it still has the rest of it to complete the airfoil shape to efficiently produce lift.
Joe, please don’t feel attacked by this suggestion-it’s just something small that I think could improve the seriousness of the topic. Having had some experience with stage performing, I’ve noticed how little things like body language and reactions can affect the overall flow of a presentation. In the video, after each high five, you laugh feels awkward and not natural as you walk away, and while it’s great to see you enjoying yourself, it creates a slight contrast since your colleague stays serious. To keep things consistent and professional, maybe try skipping the laughter but keep it joyful, so the gesture has more impact. Just a small thought to help make the video even better! I really like these kind of learning videos if you bcs you have a gift to explain it crisp and clear.
I went for my RPL yesterday but we got to the training area and we got severe carb icing so we had to turn back, re going tomorrow in a different aircraft
Dear Sir, for example We are planning a flight from OPKC to OPSK using an A320 aircraft. As you know, the TAF provides forecasted visibility, while the Jeppesen plates for OPSK only show RVR. Could you please advise me, at planning stage, how to convert TAF visibility to the charted RVR, or vice versa? Your guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Hello Captain Joe, I want to ask how airlines look at ATPL theory results today,I mean is it necessary to have over 90% in average and what about retaking some subjects?
The truth is ATPL don’t even count that much. Airlines need pilots who are well versed with the knowledge. You need to prepare enough and you should know everything by interview time. A question will pop from anywhere😂. Don’t stress about ATPL results but you have to pass it. Use QB to pass but after sit down and read 📌. Have content to back up your results
Huh? For question 1, if the AoA increases, the sensor rotates counterclockwise, as they said. Therefore it rotates "down" in relation to the nose of the plane, and down in relation to where the sensor tip was to begin with. Why is the answer rotate up?
Wait I have a question what will happen if a commercial airplane gets intercepted by the Air Force and gets shot down what charges will the Air Force face?
Question 226270 is still so unclear to me, how's that disc showing an axis that I imagine it as such then turns out so wrong, I mean I try to rotate the gyro as in the axis and find A a pitch then it's a Yaw
I too think the figure is kind of tricky, as '3D' drawings often are. I imagine that "A" depicts something similar to a bicycle wheel in the same orientation as the nose wheel of the aircraft. Grabing the wheel mount with your left hand to the left and your right hand to the right of the wheel hub (with the wheel spinning), you would be able to feel movement in yaw and roll (but not pitch). Then I think the more solid marked axis is supposed to tell us that the assembly is fixed such that you only feel rotation in the direction of your hands moving up and down (not forward and backward). Finally we have to figure that when we feel hands up-down force, the origin of the force (before procession) must have been yaw. ... maybe.
@@Rodhern I was attempting this whole time to flip sideways, as it's a paper being flipped in sides backwards and forwards, then I saw the answer and realised it was to rotate the points, as to bring top right end to top left so top left will go bottom left and so on, it's rotating not flipping papers or disks shown here as gyroscopes
Haha just to joke, why are you pilots paid too much??? Any smart kid in elementary school can answer these questions at least 50% correctly if answers are multiple choice. Also the kid has to be really interested in aviation.
The gyro question was difficult only because I have never seen that form of schematic symbol.
The problem with the autoland question is that it does not state whether the autoland system is fail-passive or fail-operational. This changes the answer because fail-passive requires visual reference to continue but fail-operational will continue the landing (With exceptions for a small number of memory item failures of the core autoland system.).
For the second question I took the „donkey bridge“ - ECTM + for climb and + ECTM - for decend from the comments, this also takes the EAS into account. When you get a question like this, you just crossout the speed that is constant and the other speeds behave according to + or -. For example you climb with constant TAS: -ECxM+. EAS and CAS decrease, while Mach Number inscreases.
Thank you for your effort guys, you‘re doing a great job with your explanations and informing videos. Auf gut Deutsch gesagt, Joe und Fabi ihr seid absolute Ehrenmänner und auch sonst liebe ich Joe‘s Videos
Question 1: actually, the nose of the plane is to the right of the AoA sensor.
The sensor is installed on the left side of the plane, therefore left of the nose.
I understood the question in the same way 👀
Amazing video! I might consider doing my ATPLs in the future so this really helps. Keep these videos coming please. Great content and explanation. Keep it up!
this channel never dissapoints
Didn't know how to read the scematic for the gyros, but must admit, that there is a nice logic to your "missing axis" argument. I.e. assuming the 'thick' axis measures torque, we know which two axes won't register a reading (the spin axis because any rotation there just feels like a slight spin speed change to the gyro, and the measurement axis because of precession).
Finally got some right this time haha (number 1 and 4). Very interesting as usual :)
Hello, you are the man I like the most, Joe.
@2:00
“Aerodynamically shaped”
Sorry but I object to the use of the phrase “pretty obvious” with regard to the pointy end is the one that’s going to face into the wind, given that wings, which AOAs are frequently compared to, have their thick ends facing the wind and not their pointy ends.
Even in that case the leading edge of the wing still faces the wind with the thinner part. The thicker part is far behind. If you picture a triangular object facing the wind, which way would you consider it "aerodynamically shaped"?
@@dimitris2521 Sorry no, the thickest part of the wing is almost always the leading edge because it induces the airflow to race over the top of it as moves toward the trailing edge so it can produce downwash. Having the pointy end head first would not be aerodynamic in terms of a wing. If it were compared to the nose of aircraft however I'd be inclined to call it "aerodynamically shaped" since the thinnest part faces the wind and it thickens out as you move back.
@@filthywings353 i mean the thickest part of the leading edge itself, not the whole wing.
@@filthywings353 He never implied that the triangular object is wing-shaped, just aerodynamically shaped, which it is. You made the comparison with a wing and I noted that even in that context the leading edge of the wing still does not introduce the thicker part right away but has a thinner part in front which is in fact aerodynamically shaped. Then, because it's a wing and not a "windex" to just point itself into the wind, it still has the rest of it to complete the airfoil shape to efficiently produce lift.
@@dimitris2521 Ok I see what you mean now. My apologies.
Joe, please don’t feel attacked by this suggestion-it’s just something small that I think could improve the seriousness of the topic.
Having had some experience with stage performing, I’ve noticed how little things like body language and reactions can affect the overall flow of a presentation. In the video, after each high five, you laugh feels awkward and not natural as you walk away, and while it’s great to see you enjoying yourself, it creates a slight contrast since your colleague stays serious. To keep things consistent and professional, maybe try skipping the laughter but keep it joyful, so the gesture has more impact. Just a small thought to help make the video even better!
I really like these kind of learning videos if you bcs you have a gift to explain it crisp and clear.
These are awesome. please keep going!
Love your videos ❤
I went for my RPL yesterday but we got to the training area and we got severe carb icing so we had to turn back, re going tomorrow in a different aircraft
Thank you
Dear Sir,
for example
We are planning a flight from OPKC to OPSK using an A320 aircraft. As you know, the TAF provides forecasted visibility, while the Jeppesen plates for OPSK only show RVR.
Could you please advise me, at planning stage, how to convert TAF visibility to the charted RVR, or vice versa? Your guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
4/5. I’ll take that
Hello Captain Joe, I want to ask how airlines look at ATPL theory results today,I mean is it necessary to have over 90% in average and what about retaking some subjects?
They don't care about your percentage as long as you passed everything without any problems
The truth is ATPL don’t even count that much. Airlines need pilots who are well versed with the knowledge.
You need to prepare enough and you should know everything by interview time. A question will pop from anywhere😂. Don’t stress about ATPL results but you have to pass it.
Use QB to pass but after sit down and read 📌. Have content to back up your results
...🤯 ... - every question wrong answered , again
flying is not for me to difficult
You learn from your mistakes. No one was born to know everything but constant reading will push you over the line.
A good pilot is always reading👍🏿
Missed them all again--5 more reasons the world is safer with me on the ground.
Joe can you explain VOR navigation in simple language
Please do MET next 🫠
Huh? For question 1, if the AoA increases, the sensor rotates counterclockwise, as they said. Therefore it rotates "down" in relation to the nose of the plane, and down in relation to where the sensor tip was to begin with. Why is the answer rotate up?
Have u ever face radar altimeter all of suddenly dropping to almost zero during ILS while actually u were fairly at good altitude
Hello I can't get this , it doesn't seem to support Australia.
I want to study with u guys .
What do I do
파이팅 힘내줄껏💖✋💖
Wait I have a question what will happen if a commercial airplane gets intercepted by the Air Force and gets shot down what charges will the Air Force face?
W Captain Joe!
Pin??
Question 226270 is still so unclear to me, how's that disc showing an axis that I imagine it as such then turns out so wrong, I mean I try to rotate the gyro as in the axis and find A a pitch then it's a Yaw
I too think the figure is kind of tricky, as '3D' drawings often are. I imagine that "A" depicts something similar to a bicycle wheel in the same orientation as the nose wheel of the aircraft. Grabing the wheel mount with your left hand to the left and your right hand to the right of the wheel hub (with the wheel spinning), you would be able to feel movement in yaw and roll (but not pitch). Then I think the more solid marked axis is supposed to tell us that the assembly is fixed such that you only feel rotation in the direction of your hands moving up and down (not forward and backward). Finally we have to figure that when we feel hands up-down force, the origin of the force (before procession) must have been yaw. ... maybe.
@@Rodhern I was attempting this whole time to flip sideways, as it's a paper being flipped in sides backwards and forwards, then I saw the answer and realised it was to rotate the points, as to bring top right end to top left so top left will go bottom left and so on, it's rotating not flipping papers or disks shown here as gyroscopes
@@abdelkadermehiz9407 Yeah, they look like some sort of wiggle flipper sensors for sure. Guess now we know better. 🙂
@@Rodhern yes glad I tried and learned
W Aviation
Yeahhh buddy
Do more questions, but less high fives. Ty
First upload in wbout 20 years
❤❤
I chat Joe on facebook
A'ight 💯
aoa pic sx
Haha just to joke, why are you pilots paid too much??? Any smart kid in elementary school can answer these questions at least 50% correctly if answers are multiple choice. Also the kid has to be really interested in aviation.
علي موحان💛💗💛💗💛💗💛💛💗💛💗💛💗💛💛💗💛💙💛💙💛💛💙💛💙💛💙💛💙💛💛💙💛💙💛💙💛💛💙💛💙💛💙💛💙💛💙💙💙