And when west was still on darkness there were Muslim Arabs who paved the way to Inquisition persuate questions observation inference hypothesis theory and principal in the field of acquired knowledge under the shadow of Islam that further opened the avenues of knowledge to the west when they come across with the treasure of Arab Muslims wonderful and valuable achievement in getting knowledge and wisdom! Now do we have a large heart and mind to recognize and accept this fact?
There is not two truths ... that discussion was already set and done centuries ago....please read a bit more about the history of the church. You presented a VERY biased account
@@Grunt_01Galileo at the time could not prove the claim made by aristotle that if the earth moved around sun, there would be a parallax shift of the stars in the sky. It was only later that we understood the great distances of the stars and developed more precise technology to see this. So the church was right in saying that it was supposed to be a theory, but Galileo wrongly asserted that it was true. Whether he needed to be punished ( although leniently) is questionable, but if the Church acted as a regulatory body on scientific literature, they would be right to redact his truth claim.
@@den8863uh no. He had good evidence due to the movements of plantets and the church explicitly stated this is false due to scripture. Stop peddling apopogetics..
@@den8863 The church was not "right" in their assertion, they were being didactic. The church may have been the self-appointed regulatory commission with respect to scientific matters but saying that it had a 'right' to redact Galileo's observations is akin to contending that the SS had the 'right' to enter one's home. A watermark issued by a body of scientists/astronomers notwithstanding, Galileo's findings (something that DaVinci successfully and wisely tiptoed around much earlier, and Copernicus never made an issue of beyond his initial writings) was, via his refracting telescope, virtual proof of heliocentrism. '...Leniently punished'? To spend the final decade of one's life under house arrest - and it would have been more had he lived longer - hardly seems like a lenient reprimand.
Salute to Copernicus and Galileo great souls.
Laudato Si interferes in scientific matters? I'd like to hear more about how that's the case.
Yes, a rather strange point. Laudato Si actually draws heavily on the latest avilable science.
An additional note: Copernicus was a Catholic cleric. Lots of scientists were religious.
There are so many errors presented here, it is disturbing. Please search beyond the standard false narrative.
And when west was still on darkness there were Muslim Arabs who paved the way to Inquisition persuate questions observation inference hypothesis theory and principal in the field of acquired knowledge under the shadow of Islam that further opened the avenues of knowledge to the west when they come across with the treasure of Arab Muslims wonderful and valuable achievement in getting knowledge and wisdom! Now do we have a large heart and mind to recognize and accept this fact?
😂😂😂
Galileo saw the mountains on the moon but the bank can't generate a clearer video of the robbers. 😂
The E"ART"H is round! The Sun is flat 👀‼️🤔
Very Funny!
There is not two truths ... that discussion was already set and done centuries ago....please read a bit more about the history of the church. You presented a VERY biased account
could you elaborate?
@@Grunt_01Galileo at the time could not prove the claim made by aristotle that if the earth moved around sun, there would be a parallax shift of the stars in the sky. It was only later that we understood the great distances of the stars and developed more precise technology to see this. So the church was right in saying that it was supposed to be a theory, but Galileo wrongly asserted that it was true. Whether he needed to be punished ( although leniently) is questionable, but if the Church acted as a regulatory body on scientific literature, they would be right to redact his truth claim.
@@den8863uh no. He had good evidence due to the movements of plantets and the church explicitly stated this is false due to scripture. Stop peddling apopogetics..
@@mariomario1462 yes, and the church acknowledged that and funded him. It was still not conclusive proof. The church funded his research knowing that.
@@den8863 The church was not "right" in their assertion, they were being didactic. The church may have been the self-appointed regulatory commission with respect to scientific matters but saying that it had a 'right' to redact Galileo's observations is akin to contending that the SS had the 'right' to enter one's home. A watermark issued by a body of scientists/astronomers notwithstanding, Galileo's findings (something that DaVinci successfully and wisely tiptoed around much earlier, and Copernicus never made an issue of beyond his initial writings) was, via his refracting telescope, virtual proof of heliocentrism. '...Leniently punished'?
To spend the final decade of one's life under house arrest - and it would have been more had he lived longer - hardly seems like a lenient reprimand.
Pope John Paul II ask for Forgiveness for the false condemnation of Galileo...
gotta apologise a lot for pedophilia