Like the music in this video? It's called "Monkey Business". Get it on iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/album/monkey/1457690282 More links in the video description.
Having just watched this film, I feel confident in suggesting that there were no clever stunts or cgi and in fact, they hired dozens of people to be horribly injured and die so they could get such realistic shots.
It’s simple...These motorcycles are rear wheel drive. It’s not a jump of the bike, but a backward rotation with the rear wheel becoming the axis of said rotation. The motorcycle rider’s arm gets stuck in the back wheel, pulling him backward, With his hand momentarily still clutching the handle bar. This quick jerk of the handlebars, combined with his entire body’s rearward momentum, combined with the abrupt grinding, lock-up of the back wheel... causes a high speed wheelie to go into action. Once enough of his body has been sucked into those rear spokes, And the opposing forces reach their moment of inertia, the bike is going to do a full 180° backward arc. It doesn’t “jump” backwards at all. It’s just the illusion of the forward momentum of both the other bike directly behind him and the camera tracking that makes it appear to move backward. The slight hop entirely off the ground that occurs in the process is a little unbelievable, but hey, they have to add some pizzazz to it.
Fame Focus -Well, Neil also believes that if a helicopter’s engines fail, it just drops out of the sky. He and I disagree on a lot of things, but we’re working on it ;)
When you drop down to the first gear at a very high speed, the bike usually does a wheelie, a dangerous one. And the changing of gears is nothing but shiftt of the chain, and that's where his hand is stuck, not exactly the tyre. Check.
Pain from arm cut caused his right hand to squeeze or pull back turning the throttle and causing the bike to wheelie ... that would be the most logical explanation for the stunt. In reality without dropping the clutch it wouldnt flick like that unless it had about 400bhp or more though as its from a moving start
It is possible that as he leaned back and or flinched from his arm coming off, twisting the throttle wide open and wheelied the bike into a pogo postion.
I think what happened is that the biker felt the pain when his arm went through the back wheel and decided to hit the front wheel brakes but ended worse for him.
first of all nice fan narrative, but grabbing front brake would at worst case make you front flip not back flip. Their is literally no way to back flip a motorcycle
@famefocus , you may be right about the physics mishap, but if the friction of the back tire is still strong against the ground and the rider's other hand is still on the handle and he pulls back on the handle as a result of his sliced of hand hanging in there, it could cause that to happen as the front part of the bike lifts of the ground, but again that scene was intense and fast and you couldn't tell if his hand was cut of completely with the jacket and if his other hand was on the handle, but yet again its a John wick movie we are talking about here
Possible explanation 3:50 front was turned and probably right arm pulls front wheel brakes slowing the bike slightly, lopped arm was being pulled then driver gets pulled back, accidental wheelie, suddenly random small pebble or uneven road makes the bike bounce. guy behind was now faster, collision.
The bike doesn't jump backwards. It jumps upwards and all the other bikes keep moving forwards, making it look like the first one goes backwards. The jump is the bigger problem, nothing to really give it lift.
yap, and lets assume its a stomping clutch (i dunno how to say), superbike still can wheelie at high speed and with the rider position leaning on backseat maybe its possible
@@arzhell37 it's not. The only guy who knows what bikes do in this movie is Keanu Reeves, but obviously he just did what was told and didn't get involved. It's a ridiculous scene all from the very first second. Like everything else in this movie.
I love JW3 but The Villainess did this bike chase first. It was exhilarating the first time I saw it, in JW3 I was a little disappointed they'd ripped it off almost scene for scene. Both great movies though. The Villainess also has one of the best opening action sequences of any movie.
@@robnederhorst4251 No disrespect intended. Still an amazing sequence regardless of who did it. Such a cool scene to bring to life. Can't wait for JW4.
B GM none taken. We didn’t hide the fact that we were heavily influenced by that film. The goal was “how do we go bigger?” By having the bikes really move and have the camera go between them we made it quite challenging for everyone involved.
In the bike jumping backward scene it IS wrong completely. With that said though, IF, they had the bike pull to the right and pull back at the same time, that would have been a bit more accurate. The scene would have been the man's arm is cut off then man on bike falling into the spokes. With only one hand and falling backward. the one hand on the right handle this could possibly cause the biker to pull up on the bike and accelerate. This would cause the bike to lung forward swing to the right because the right handle would be pulled to that side. With the arm catching the spokes and locking the back wheel this would start the bike up and around for a brief second. Once that happened this would cause the bike to do something along the lines of a pirouette spinning to the right then flipping end over end into the biker behind it. This would make more sense as to how this particular scene would play out.
well, let me tell what i think about two moments with physics (i may be wrong) 1. why bike was pulled up? When the driver’s hand was engaged with the wheel spokes, it pulled the driver in the opposite direction from the direction of the wheel’s movement (for example, when two gears are attached to each other), the biker continued to hold the steering wheel with his other hand, as well as his feet near the engine. Due to the pulling force of the human hand and having a moment of rotation (counterclockwise), the bike was raised up. *BUT* this is not so, because the biker immediately released the steering wheel, and this should pull the bike to the ground under the action of gravity multiplied by mass, and also, so that the hand does not come off under a very large tension force, it takes some time to hands didn’t tear, for this you need to hold on to the front of the bike (near the wheel), which cannot be true. 2. why bike was pulled backwards? Once the bike was lifted up and torn off the ground, the force of air resistance acted on it. This power turned out to be large and slowed the bike faster. The camera position had a great speed, like the bike that stood behind the bike raised up. The speed difference showed a strange picture. *BUT* the resistance force should not be so large due to the not large area of contact of the air flow, the bike should not have come off so quickly. In conclusion: ... Why you read this? Doesn't it matter?
I didn't find that fight scene convincing at all. I'm a retired CG guy and a lifelong motorcyclist. Almost none of that fight is possible mounted on a bike, mostly in what Keanu is doing. A bike with a front wheel or back wheel locked is probably going to go down - more likely to just lay down with the back wheel locked or slide if you control it well. If the front wheel locked it just washes out - I just did this on snow and broke my ankle.
@@robnederhorst4251 Didn't know the Verrazano went between Manhattan and Brooklyn. Last time I was on the Verrazano I was driving from my place in Brooklyn to a friends in Staten island and the Verrazano Narrows bridge doesn't' have trains running on it .
When the back wheel is arrested with a hand at that speed, the bike's forward wheel is still running which causes the reversal motion. So the bike flips . But the vfx guy is saying the bike should slide. Which physics is real?
CGI physics that doesn't match the real world is what pulls me out of the movie. I spend the next five or ten minutes thinking about how and why they did it wrong, instead of following the movie.
Like the music in this video? It's called "Monkey Business". Get it on iTunes: itunes.apple.com/us/album/monkey/1457690282 More links in the video description.
Your eyebrows are so restless
😄
Having just watched this film, I feel confident in suggesting that there were no clever stunts or cgi and in fact, they hired dozens of people to be horribly injured and die so they could get such realistic shots.
0:50 'no skippin' & thats when i skipped 😂😂😂
:(
It’s simple...These motorcycles are rear wheel drive. It’s not a jump of the bike, but a backward rotation with the rear wheel becoming the axis of said rotation. The motorcycle rider’s arm gets stuck in the back wheel, pulling him backward, With his hand momentarily still clutching the handle bar. This quick jerk of the handlebars, combined with his entire body’s rearward momentum, combined with the abrupt grinding, lock-up of the back wheel... causes a high speed wheelie to go into action. Once enough of his body has been sucked into those rear spokes, And the opposing forces reach their moment of inertia, the bike is going to do a full 180° backward arc. It doesn’t “jump” backwards at all. It’s just the illusion of the forward momentum of both the other bike directly behind him and the camera tracking that makes it appear to move backward. The slight hop entirely off the ground that occurs in the process is a little unbelievable, but hey, they have to add some pizzazz to it.
I'm sure Neil deGrasse Tyson would disagree...
Fame Focus -Well, Neil also believes that if a helicopter’s engines fail, it just drops out of the sky. He and I disagree on a lot of things, but we’re working on it ;)
@@Indrid-Cold my same synapses, saved me the time
Neil's a du e c h e
This is sooooo cool.It's incredible how they made this scene!!
So fascinating! I didn't catch that physics-defying goof. LOL John Wick movies rock! the editors did an amazing job piecing it all together.
Can you stop moving your eyebrows? Thanks
I frown upon that comment!
I actually agree with andruja its just distracting
I agree too. Its extremely distracting. Don't do it please. Let them rest.
I read your comment before i started watching the video and now i can't stop laughing
vfx artist are the real hero..
When you drop down to the first gear at a very high speed, the bike usually does a wheelie, a dangerous one. And the changing of gears is nothing but shiftt of the chain, and that's where his hand is stuck, not exactly the tyre. Check.
Wow. Isn't this really amazing????
Really this is
your eyebrow movements have me hypnotized. Big hug from argentina👍
It's a rare ability!
i f'ckin love this movie oh so gooooood
Hell yahhhh
Pain from arm cut caused his right hand to squeeze or pull back turning the throttle and causing the bike to wheelie ... that would be the most logical explanation for the stunt. In reality without dropping the clutch it wouldnt flick like that unless it had about 400bhp or more though as its from a moving start
Nice! But what explains the lifting off the ground?
@@FameFocus thats the Hollywood 400bhp magic part bud :)
We designed it with that exact jerking motion in mind. I was the vfx supervisor on this film.
@@robnederhorst4251 thanks for pitching in with a reply bud.
@@robnederhorst4251 nice work on the film, can u check out my music vid luxury tax on my page
Half of the comments are about his eyebrows.....sheeeesh!!! Too many salty, unhappy trolls living in the internet nowadays
This comment is a rare one! Thanks :)
wow it is incredible
gosh damn, didnt know theyre using green screen for this one.
thanks for sharing
Really enjoyed!!!
It is possible that as he leaned back and or flinched from his arm coming off, twisting the throttle wide open and wheelied the bike into a pogo postion.
🤙🤣😂😂🤣 the question at the end of the video. 🤣👌
I think what happened is that the biker felt the pain when his arm went through the back wheel and decided to hit the front wheel brakes but ended worse for him.
Yeah, that doesn't work either. Good try though! :)
first of all nice fan narrative, but grabbing front brake would at worst case make you front flip not back flip. Their is literally no way to back flip a motorcycle
@@FameFocus way to be passive aggressive, douche
Cool man
Great work👍
@famefocus , you may be right about the physics mishap, but if the friction of the back tire is still strong against the ground and the rider's other hand is still on the handle and he pulls back on the handle as a result of his sliced of hand hanging in there, it could cause that to happen as the front part of the bike lifts of the ground, but again that scene was intense and fast and you couldn't tell if his hand was cut of completely with the jacket and if his other hand was on the handle, but yet again its a John wick movie we are talking about here
just discovered this channel and it is absolute gold. Love these VFX breakdowns
Welcome! Just discovered this comment and it made me happy :)
Best your video
Next do John Wick 4❤❤❤
Amazing
Wao so good
Possible explanation 3:50 front was turned and probably right arm pulls front wheel brakes slowing the bike slightly, lopped arm was being pulled then driver gets pulled back, accidental wheelie, suddenly random small pebble or uneven road makes the bike bounce. guy behind was now faster, collision.
I love your work and I wish I could learn from you
OMG HOW THE GREEN SCREEN IS GREEN, AMAZING VIDEO EAT A LIKE
It happened because of VFX magic :D
The bike doesn't jump backwards. It jumps upwards and all the other bikes keep moving forwards, making it look like the first one goes backwards. The jump is the bigger problem, nothing to really give it lift.
yap, and lets assume its a stomping clutch (i dunno how to say), superbike still can wheelie at high speed and with the rider position leaning on backseat maybe its possible
@@arzhell37 it's not. The only guy who knows what bikes do in this movie is Keanu Reeves, but obviously he just did what was told and didn't get involved. It's a ridiculous scene all from the very first second. Like everything else in this movie.
Actually Keanu was very much involved. He was giving notes on bike movement in lost production. He’s a hell of a great guy.
Why does it look better than the vfx in avengers.
Still prefer it when you just play the clips with the music without having to listen to you explain
Yeah👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
agree
Agreed. Less of tht guy...more vfx footage
I am not skipped bro
I love JW3 but The Villainess did this bike chase first. It was exhilarating the first time I saw it, in JW3 I was a little disappointed they'd ripped it off almost scene for scene. Both great movies though. The Villainess also has one of the best opening action sequences of any movie.
B GM we were inspired by that film for sure. It’s super fun.
@@robnederhorst4251 No disrespect intended. Still an amazing sequence regardless of who did it. Such a cool scene to bring to life. Can't wait for JW4.
B GM none taken. We didn’t hide the fact that we were heavily influenced by that film. The goal was “how do we go bigger?” By having the bikes really move and have the camera go between them we made it quite challenging for everyone involved.
I couldn't take my eyes off your eyebrows
This is the first time the tumbnail is real.
0:38, tone down your mimics, dude, you look like from Gary's mod
Hahahahaha.
That's how you make an Action Porn film 😂, pushing everything to limit.
I can whoop Keanu 😅 w the ATV stunts like I did chasing my cattle n livestocks back in the day when they naughty
Is that Pippo Inzaghi hosting the video?
In the bike jumping backward scene it IS wrong completely. With that said though, IF, they had the bike pull to the right and pull back at the same time, that would have been a bit more accurate. The scene would have been the man's arm is cut off then man on bike falling into the spokes. With only one hand and falling backward. the one hand on the right handle this could possibly cause the biker to pull up on the bike and accelerate. This would cause the bike to lung forward swing to the right because the right handle would be pulled to that side. With the arm catching the spokes and locking the back wheel this would start the bike up and around for a brief second. Once that happened this would cause the bike to do something along the lines of a pirouette spinning to the right then flipping end over end into the biker behind it. This would make more sense as to how this particular scene would play out.
well, let me tell what i think about two moments with physics (i may be wrong)
1. why bike was pulled up?
When the driver’s hand was engaged with the wheel spokes, it pulled the driver in the opposite direction from the direction of the wheel’s movement (for example, when two gears are attached to each other), the biker continued to hold the steering wheel with his other hand, as well as his feet near the engine. Due to the pulling force of the human hand and having a moment of rotation (counterclockwise), the bike was raised up. *BUT* this is not so, because the biker immediately released the steering wheel, and this should pull the bike to the ground under the action of gravity multiplied by mass, and also, so that the hand does not come off under a very large tension force, it takes some time to hands didn’t tear, for this you need to hold on to the front of the bike (near the wheel), which cannot be true.
2. why bike was pulled backwards?
Once the bike was lifted up and torn off the ground, the force of air resistance acted on it. This power turned out to be large and slowed the bike faster. The camera position had a great speed, like the bike that stood behind the bike raised up. The speed difference showed a strange picture. *BUT* the resistance force should not be so large due to the not large area of contact of the air flow, the bike should not have come off so quickly.
In conclusion:
...
Why you read this? Doesn't it matter?
Because it was interesting to read your opinion and no, not really, it's just a bit of fun ;)
this is cgi doin right.... not excessive like those thor love and thunder, multiverse of madness or general marvel franchise
if video without show the dude and his voice, i'll subscribe this channel
Wow amazing bro finish subscrbe
I do understand how they do those effects & CG. But i don't understand how your eyebrows racing each other...
You take a lot of time doing this do you
Yep :)
Oh so John Wick is just a fairy Tale
Love
0:11 🐴🐴
I want to learn that
Wow I didn't even know they used cgi in this movie
I love you so much keanu reeves💋💋💋
Dude, tame those eyebrows....
Its not that it jumped back.. it got left behind by the flow of the bikes when it immediately stoped thus it look like it jumped behind.
Make your own movie coz john wick is top
I didn't find that fight scene convincing at all. I'm a retired CG guy and a lifelong motorcyclist. Almost none of that fight is possible mounted on a bike, mostly in what Keanu is doing. A bike with a front wheel or back wheel locked is probably going to go down - more likely to just lay down with the back wheel locked or slide if you control it well. If the front wheel locked it just washes out - I just did this on snow and broke my ankle.
Is thia the one with the horse? I saw the one with the horse.
Jurrasic Park
The bike did something magical? The whole sequence is fake and not from this world so what
it actually was the Williamsburg Bridge.
John F. Rivera no we shot on the Verrazano bridge.
@@robnederhorst4251 Didn't know the Verrazano went between Manhattan and Brooklyn. Last time I was on the Verrazano I was driving from my place in Brooklyn to a friends in Staten island and the Verrazano Narrows bridge doesn't' have trains running on it .
John F. Rivera it’s doesn’t have trains on it. It connects Staten Island and Brooklyn. Geographically it’s not correct in the film. ;)
@@robnederhorst4251 So your telling me I'm correct in saying its the Williamsburg Bridge in the movie?
John F. Rivera yes but it couldn’t have worked for us filming wise.
tutorial plz
Sy ingat suara perempuan mula-mula 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
pls upload another version without explanation
There's plenty of those on RUclips
lol
how the effects were done were not clear.
Keanu reeves❤❤
Just things that went on the back it was the sword
I think it's torque
show more vfx work...
Because it was inverted
Osm
Old movies still better in actions,
Thats it!?,
i thought John Wick 100% real, hahahaha
Brandon Lee as long as you are in the film and don’t think about visual effects we have done our jobs!
or you could just use practical effects
... and get stuntmen killed
It would be impossible to shoot this practically. Safety being the first reason. Also the choreography alone would need to change dramatically.
I thought Kiano did everything real
Dude it's "keanu"
Admission hona chatahu
That’s easy, the bike was a mirror image and so the back became the front and was able to flip.....pah , anyone would know that!! 😂😉😊
Plese hindi language
0:46
you are wrong, physics is all right, if you throw anything to moving wheel (back wheel)on the motorbike it will behave like in the movie
I our universe it can't
When the back wheel is arrested with a hand at that speed, the bike's forward wheel is still running which causes the reversal motion. So the bike flips . But the vfx guy is saying the bike should slide. Which physics is real?
Thats physics aregument against movie world physics. Not relevant
yamaha mt09 bikes...
To kya vo such me logo ko marega film k liye bus kar bhai
Please don’t explain don’t like your voice.. and expressions ....
Why? Oo, His voice is fine
Fake girl id .
First 😂😅
😂
Last viewer.😎😂❣️
You need some work out...tiny arms
He can make them bigger with VFX.
i Want kiss you, i Love you
😂
Too much cgi.
bruh why u sound like a elf
pls make the old vfx breackdowns without this guy in it
Eh he’s got charisma
Awesome but is not perfect 😊
Knife cgi so cartoonish
Your voice is weird
😂
CGI physics that doesn't match the real world is what pulls me out of the movie.
I spend the next five or ten minutes thinking about how and why they did it wrong, instead of following the movie.
Did this scene pull you out of the film?