The rtx 3050 seems like nvidias way of testing how high they can go with price to performance and still have people buy it, seeing how most gpus in its price range speed past it
@@AntCrazyy I personally like GTX 980Ti, because it is the last GPU, that have support for analog VGA monitors through DVI-I to VGA Adapter. I am using old Dell 17" monitor as secondary monitor for my 4K Dell monitor.
@@brainlesscactus3184 No its not just look at amd and Nvidia. Amd is much less respected than Nvidia but amd gpus are much cheaper than nvidia because of competition
I’ve been running a sparkle A770 for the last 4 months and I have to say I’ve been noting but impressed by it, I heard of the issues with it and personally haven’t had any yet, it runs all my games either even or just behind my 3070 by a little and ever updated it just gets even better
A major sticking point that can't be overlooked is the driver support like you mentioned. Whilst the card happily trades blows with AMD and Nvidia, for a much cheaper price, PC gamers want stability and performance in both new AND older games, the Intel drivers only really work well on Direct X 11 and 12 games, along with Vulkan. Until DX 9 and 10 (and OpenGL) games can work reliability with older games and significantly close the performance gap, alot of people are going to think twice before picking up ARC.
I hope they nail it down in the future and get all that compatibility working properly. They could genuinely compete. I'm an Nvidia guy but I'm ngl these intel cards have been looking really nice. Simple but beautiful designs and at a decent price for the performance. I'll be keeping an eye on them for the future definitely
Got an a750 with my Christmas build its been great after updating the drivers for games and video editing even when limited by 8gb of ram. Even works for old games and emulating
@@soundsOf75better than 6600 for sure and beats 3050 clearly and 3060 at some points so you can get it, I have got arc 580 for video editing and that thing is even better than 3060 at it
I've had an A750 for the about 8 months now and it went from "I could live with that" to "It just works". Not to mention their driver updates are very aggressive. And they have real driver support. ie someone responds anywhere from 1-4 hours to address a software issue! People should be thinking Intel.
It really depends on the use case, where the Intel Arc cards really shines is the AV1 encoding and really fast H.264 and H.265 encoding which makes it excellent for streaming and video editing, for gaming it still has ways to go yet but for the moment it still does alright.
@@The_Wither_Skull Even if Intel is new in this sector, that performance target is pretty good, considering that the RTX 4080 is more than powerful to play games in Ultra with RTX and XeSS can rival with DLSS because thay both use AI Processing, something that FSR lacks of. And if the price/performance is good they can provide a solid product, with everything they learned on this generation with a better price than Nvidia and without problems like AMD has sometimes
Tbh I upgraded in October my pc with an arc 770 16gb. And So far I haven't had a single problem. I only had a short graphics bug in cs2 once, but after I restarted cs2 everything was fine. I can't complain about Intel GPUs.
More like cautious, some people just expect things to work without much tinkering, the moment INTEL GPU reviews come with a stamp that says that it works as well as the other 2, then we'll see some talk.
I really love your content. Sadly, I do not live in the States, and instead, I live on the other side of the world where there is no Microcenter, but there are a lot of scammers in the used tech market😂 I live in the Philippines, btw.
I use Intel Arc GPUs for business to decode up to 64 NVR streams from over 20 different physical locations (while also using the machine as a workstation). They’re decoding beasts and a good deal! Can’t wait for gen 2.
@@user-rr7zb9kr1gDude 7600 is equal to arc a750 not a770 and a750 have tdp of 170 w at 1440p ultra settings. If we talk about a770 performance, it have a average 180-190w and max 200w in 1440p ultra setting.
If i cant get it for my little siblings and not have to worry about it causing catastrophic issues then I'll pick them up. I hope battlemage becomes a more competitive option to pick up that its over priced competition
Now Intel makes GPUs. 2 out of 3 GPU companies also are CPU companies (AMD and Intel). The only GPU company that doesn't make CPUs is Nvidia. This means that Nvidia will eventually start making CPUs kinda like Intel started making GPUs.
Nvidia wouldn't be able to. For Nvidia to make X86 CPUs they would need an x86 licence from Intel and an x86-64 licence from AMD to do so. Only thing they could do is make ARM based processors but that has the caveat of needing to emulate x86 for games that has a performance penalty.
i wanted to let you to know that the rx 5700 xt has been completely sold out on new egg for msrp and now being thrown on the amazon market for around 250-300$ now so scalping a old card lol
Thing is, the drivers are not good in old games where u already get like 300 fps.. but compared to nvidia and amd which get like 400.. does it matter tho, dont think so..especially when u consider that it beats it competitors in actual demanding games like rdr2 where every fps matters
I used an a770 for a bit, snagged on newegg for $280. It was damn good, no issues whatsoever, even with older games. I'd recommend it to people who are planning on building a pc soon.
Amazing GPU for sub 200. Great performance now (still getting updates that improves performance by 20%) and amazing encoders that only 4000 series GPUs or 7000 have. No difference in performance with AMD or Intel CPUs
The market needs higher end performance that is priced more competitively, or for the scale of what’s considered “high-end” vs “mid-range” these days to shift in favor of the consumer. The average consumer these days is more likely to be playing games on larger 4K TVs with HDMI 2.1, which mean a stable 4K/60 in AAA titles should be more attainable, and frankly it would be at this point but GPU manufacturers benefit more from a keeping that performance level seen as “high-end” for as long as possible, even when it should be the standard by now.
As a casual gamer that does not rush to buy or play new games, I think it's ok. As long as you have that behaviour, and don't try to get amazing video editing performance, it's fair game.
I do hope that intel gpus get even better, seeing as they are priced correctly for what they offer. I am planning on buying an intel gpu when I start to build my first all intel pc, but until then I think team amd is the way to go since my first laptop is amd.
I have a a770 and there are some serious growing pains but if you can get it in sale when it goes under $300 it's worth it since the a750 is only a bit cheaper so you might as well pay a little more and get way more performance
With how I see prices, you are usually able to scrape up $20 more for an A750 which is a big jump over the A580. Good to see options at this price range though.
Intel drivers trying to compile more than 500 Vulkan shaders without destroying the entire contents of vRAM and making the screen flash white (impossible)
I personally would nvr jump team red unless something amazing happens but i do want intel to go hard and create competition because thats just going to get all of us better faster gpus
I'm currently putting a PC together and have been seriously considering an Intel GPU. It doesn't fit my needs right now, due to the driver support for older games, but future graphics cards from Intel will be worth looking out for. I fully agree that Intel entering the GPU market will be nothing but good for consumers.
they have their own technology, Xess which beats or is on par with amd fsr, its not very popular because few people use arc so devs won't have big support for it
Im confident Intel will get their drivers together..its new tech, so problems were garunteed. Hopefully Intel develop their CPUs and GPUs to synergise and push more performance like with AMDs smart access memory.
Since we got two CPU companies(Intel and AMD if your not a computer enthusiast or don't know anything about PCs) making GPUs it would be funny to see Nvidia start making CPUs
i personally think that these cards are good for casual gamers since theres only a few games this year actually worth playing and they are optimized too. 8gb vram at 180$ sounds great.
Jep. I don't see myself buying an Intel GPU at all. But I really want them to bring a fight to AMD and NVIDIA, because this way especially NVIDIA needs to come up with more affordable price tags.
Thanks to the fact Nvidia market share is stupidly large compared to AMD and Intels share they got better driver debugging radeon brand had a terrible name in the past which is not a lone reason and intel not having enough users to report on issues for them to solve despite the fact they got a stupidly large devision ready to crush bugs
7 months later, they have released too many drivers that can increase ~7% to ~63% performance in each MAJOR version and drivers are now releasing before the game is released, like nVIDIA.
intel has some massive potential to be really good in the gpu category if they keep the pricing as reasonable as the cards they have released, they just need to fix their drivers then intel could do pretty good for a budget to midrange build
RX580 is pretty good but a bit dated for 1080p gaming. Get a used 5700xt or 6600 for AMD and 1080ti or 1660S for Nvidia. I'd definitely say 1080ti is the best of all with that sweet 11GB of VRAM which should work at 1440p low.
Yes you should be buying Intel card's!! Regardless of whether they a perfect because it's never going to get better without people buying them as no customers means no product or support for the product.. because it's a very first product it's not great because they are trying to find out how to make great hardware and software to support the hardware.. and because it's had customers look how good Intel GPUs have gotten over the last 2 years!! 100's of % better than day 1 so second generation will be way better!! And frankly the first generation hardware was as good as the competition but the software is where it struggled and it's still got plenty more to give even now.. so the answer is YES you should be buying Intel card's to strengthen them so it makes more pressure on the monopoly.
Ive got an a750 in my pc. Works great i can max out war thunder graphics, and the gpu never goes above 80 degrees and i get a stable fps (always above 100)
i have an a750, support and playability has definitely gotten way better for older games since launch, some still don't work though so if you want peace of mind just get it from amd or nvidia.
@@giang6096 im sure eventually they will be there. Eventually ill get one to mess around with when they are pocket change money for an old card. Some of the games i care about are Sonic Adventure and Sonic adventure 2 and with games that old it really is about how long the gpu manufacturer has been around since ATI is a thing and so was nvidia
What do you think about Twisted Minds monitors? They are cheaper than ASUS & LG monitors with more HZ and Fast MS but literally Twisted Minds cost a bit of budget to build gaming PC than ASUS & LG gaming monitors! Even with the same budget! What's the theory behind Twisted Minds monitor?
You’d need a pretty beefy system for that. Also why would you need or want 300 fps. Pretty much no difference along as it’s over 60fps. And your monitor would also be super expensive to be able to display that.
(Rockstar probably hasn’t divulged this info yet and GTA 6 is around 2 years out for PC), but is it possible to suggest an under $800 build today which will play GTA 6 in 1080p 60 fps High whenever it releases?
I guess 3060TI will do with something that will not choke it will get these 60 FPS on high (not max and surely no rays). Tbh you could probably get something from 40`s for not much money later on, when 50`s appear, and something like 4070 will almost 100% do it.
I remember Intel making a plan to have a GPU that undercuts and outperforms the top nvidia which I think was the 3080 at the time? What ever happened to that?
A lot to be fixed on software part. I am ready to pay $50-$100 extra to have no issues on drivers/software part, have better control panel were settings besides Sharpness are not ignored by 90% of games, and for much better DLSS, that does not turn trees and grass into shivering shit. Yes, I have AMD now and this is for the last time.
had to get my A580 with $190 (1100RON equivalent, and with sales tax removed because apperently that's how it works across the pond) because the cheapest RX6600 or similar are $250
![MISSING: SLIM SHADY [Expanded Mourner’s Edition Trailer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xh8qgHrOO1g/mqdefault.jpg)
The rtx 3050 seems like nvidias way of testing how high they can go with price to performance and still have people buy it, seeing how most gpus in its price range speed past it
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 + Crucial T700 4TB + x86-64 or x86-32 or 32-bit = good Pc
edit:?
@@legendarys2 I have a 6700xt and a r5 5600x with x86-64 and it works pretty well for 1080p
yes @@Daniel-ug8hm
@@Daniel-ug8hm bad idea or good idea
I got an arc a750 for Christmas. We draw names. So I got it for free to replace my 1650 super. Pretty excited for future driver updates
I have the same GPU, Intel ARC A750 limited edition. But I will temporary switch to used GeForce GTX 980Ti, once Intel fix issues with drivers.
@@arnislacis9064uh huh cause that’s what the arc is equal to… as someone who uses it I can say that the arc a750 blows that card out of the water lol
@@AntCrazyy I personally like GTX 980Ti, because it is the last GPU, that have support for analog VGA monitors through DVI-I to VGA Adapter. I am using old Dell 17" monitor as secondary monitor for my 4K Dell monitor.
@@arnislacis9064 that is completely fair 👍. lol I thought it was a trash on arc GPUs mb.
Same for my first pc build and I average 120 frames and even 160 for most games
Competition is good for the consumer! Bring on Intel GPU's!
They are gonna die in cpu market and focuse on gpu market
@@Crediu Nah, intel gpus are for Work not games. They codecs are amazing. a580 is as good as rtx 3080 if not better.
@@mareksv1947 for now yes but as they continue to release drivers its gonna be alot better
Thats a false statement but okay
@@brainlesscactus3184 No its not just look at amd and Nvidia. Amd is much less respected than Nvidia but amd gpus are much cheaper than nvidia because of competition
As a guy with a a750 I got for 179, I can confirm that it is fire 🔥
do u play fn? if so is it good for 1080p at performance mode??
@@aaravytheboy3582 If you mean fornite in Dx12 that card murder that game. 100+ fps
@@Miguel211216 k so it's good for performance mode 1080p?
Cause performance mode needs less graphical power
@@aaravytheboy3582depends on your cpu cause performance mode is cpu heavy, but I get about 300 fps with my i5-12600kf
I’ve been running a sparkle A770 for the last 4 months and I have to say I’ve been noting but impressed by it, I heard of the issues with it and personally haven’t had any yet, it runs all my games either even or just behind my 3070 by a little and ever updated it just gets even better
thats very promising to hear... does it pair well with intel cpus or AMD or no preference?
@@DigiDawg2no major difference in performance but i believe it has added features when paired with intel cpus.
@@malvinchau2056 it does not from what I seen. The only thing is rebar which all semi relevant CPUs have
@@DigiDawg2 they both perform about the same just as long as you have rebar on your cpu
I have intel personally,the only thing that really matters is that your motherboard supports resizable bar
A major sticking point that can't be overlooked is the driver support like you mentioned. Whilst the card happily trades blows with AMD and Nvidia, for a much cheaper price, PC gamers want stability and performance in both new AND older games, the Intel drivers only really work well on Direct X 11 and 12 games, along with Vulkan. Until DX 9 and 10 (and OpenGL) games can work reliability with older games and significantly close the performance gap, alot of people are going to think twice before picking up ARC.
thanks for clarifying
I hope they nail it down in the future and get all that compatibility working properly. They could genuinely compete. I'm an Nvidia guy but I'm ngl these intel cards have been looking really nice. Simple but beautiful designs and at a decent price for the performance. I'll be keeping an eye on them for the future definitely
Got an a750 with my Christmas build its been great after updating the drivers for games and video editing even when limited by 8gb of ram. Even works for old games and emulating
Dude I love the encoders on the arc GPUs lol. Amazing for the 180 I got it for
Intel Arc GPUs also have AV1 encoders. Mainly it is a better choice for productivity purpose!
do you think this card is a better option than an rx6600 for someone who does
3d modeling and likes to live stream on the occasion?
@@soundsOf75 No. For 3D modeling and live streaming, go with Nvidia because of their CUDA cores & their 3D model software handling.
For 3D modeling by someone who won't buy Nvidia even if his life depended on it, are the Intel Arcs worth it?
@@soundsOf75better than 6600 for sure and beats 3050 clearly and 3060 at some points so you can get it, I have got arc 580 for video editing and that thing is even better than 3060 at it
@@davidaugustofc2574 yes 580 is worth but 6600 not
I've had an A750 for the about 8 months now and it went from "I could live with that" to "It just works". Not to mention their driver updates are very aggressive. And they have real driver support. ie someone responds anywhere from 1-4 hours to address a software issue! People should be thinking Intel.
the new drivers improved things really well. They have improved from 2022 though
It really depends on the use case, where the Intel Arc cards really shines is the AV1 encoding and really fast H.264 and H.265 encoding which makes it excellent for streaming and video editing, for gaming it still has ways to go yet but for the moment it still does alright.
Cheap and good price to performance ratio. I'm aware of the issues and I will be buying one soon.
Most people with a750 and a770 are hella happy with their monsters
I hope Intel's next GPUs reach the upper-midrange to high-end market so they can really compete in a wider spectrum of the GPU market.
iirc they target the rtx 4080 as their next rival for the upcoming flagship
@@The_Wither_Skull Even if Intel is new in this sector, that performance target is pretty good, considering that the RTX 4080 is more than powerful to play games in Ultra with RTX and XeSS can rival with DLSS because thay both use AI Processing, something that FSR lacks of.
And if the price/performance is good they can provide a solid product, with everything they learned on this generation with a better price than Nvidia and without problems like AMD has sometimes
@@byallon3639 fingers crossed for a sub 800 product
Tbh I upgraded in October my pc with an arc 770 16gb.
And So far I haven't had a single problem. I only had a short graphics bug in cs2 once, but after I restarted cs2 everything was fine. I can't complain about Intel GPUs.
Hey hows the update on the GPU is still working fine?
Sparkle's gpu was clean🔥
Very beautiful explanation for Intel GPUs. People are either scared/confused or ignorant about these GPUs.
More like cautious, some people just expect things to work without much tinkering, the moment INTEL GPU reviews come with a stamp that says that it works as well as the other 2, then we'll see some talk.
Amd needs to watch out on Intel XESS fr. Tim from hardware unboxed said that the XESS technology is better than FSR. Ig DLSS on a different level
Your picture is cute
I really love your content. Sadly, I do not live in the States, and instead, I live on the other side of the world where there is no Microcenter, but there are a lot of scammers in the used tech market😂
I live in the Philippines, btw.
Yeah, drivers are not great. But if we don't encourage supporting a new company NVIDIA will always control the prices of GPUs
finally ... review for team blue
I got one for 165 at micro center, it runs beautifully, the driver updates have helped tremendously
Zach I challenge you to make a full custom loop in the H6 flow chassie whist still looking good it is an awkward case to do a full custom loop
This is a recommendation for a future video
I use Intel Arc GPUs for business to decode up to 64 NVR streams from over 20 different physical locations (while also using the machine as a workstation). They’re decoding beasts and a good deal! Can’t wait for gen 2.
Intel GPUs are underrated
@@user-rr7zb9kr1gDude 7600 is equal to arc a750 not a770 and a750 have tdp of 170 w at 1440p ultra settings.
If we talk about a770 performance, it have a average 180-190w and max 200w in 1440p ultra setting.
@@user-rr7zb9kr1g finally someone realizes that power wattage matters
If i cant get it for my little siblings and not have to worry about it causing catastrophic issues then I'll pick them up. I hope battlemage becomes a more competitive option to pick up that its over priced competition
Got the a770, runs pretty well at 1440p, especially with some performance boosting.
I’m glad people are being brave and buying them got the value . We need competition !
Idk ever since Zach got a beard I’ve trusted him more
If you got an older game on Intel you really have to use the DXVK wrapper so they play via Vulkan not DX9
i love the design of these gpu so much
Now Intel makes GPUs.
2 out of 3 GPU companies also are CPU companies (AMD and Intel).
The only GPU company that doesn't make CPUs is Nvidia.
This means that Nvidia will eventually start making CPUs kinda like Intel started making GPUs.
NVIDIA does make CPUs, just not what you think. They announced recently that they're on their way to try their hand with ARM for windows.
Nvidia wouldn't be able to. For Nvidia to make X86 CPUs they would need an x86 licence from Intel and an x86-64 licence from AMD to do so.
Only thing they could do is make ARM based processors but that has the caveat of needing to emulate x86 for games that has a performance penalty.
I love how we have a new challenger on the line. We have the bigs amd and nvidia but I love an underdog story
i wanted to let you to know that the rx 5700 xt has been completely sold out on new egg for msrp and now being thrown on the amazon market for around 250-300$ now so scalping a old card lol
Bruh. Never understood how can someone sell something so old on same prices as newer and better stuff? And who tf buys them?
@@alexturnbackthearmy1907 honestly no idea
Thing is, the drivers are not good in old games where u already get like 300 fps.. but compared to nvidia and amd which get like 400.. does it matter tho, dont think so..especially when u consider that it beats it competitors in actual demanding games like rdr2 where every fps matters
I'm actually impressed with Intel's GPU perf in recent years.
I used an a770 for a bit, snagged on newegg for $280. It was damn good, no issues whatsoever, even with older games. I'd recommend it to people who are planning on building a pc soon.
Amazing GPU for sub 200. Great performance now (still getting updates that improves performance by 20%) and amazing encoders that only 4000 series GPUs or 7000 have. No difference in performance with AMD or Intel CPUs
Really hope both those companies enter the market. We really need to get those graphic cards price lowered.
The market needs higher end performance that is priced more competitively, or for the scale of what’s considered “high-end” vs “mid-range” these days to shift in favor of the consumer. The average consumer these days is more likely to be playing games on larger 4K TVs with HDMI 2.1, which mean a stable 4K/60 in AAA titles should be more attainable, and frankly it would be at this point but GPU manufacturers benefit more from a keeping that performance level seen as “high-end” for as long as possible, even when it should be the standard by now.
As a casual gamer that does not rush to buy or play new games, I think it's ok. As long as you have that behaviour, and don't try to get amazing video editing performance, it's fair game.
I do hope that intel gpus get even better, seeing as they are priced correctly for what they offer. I am planning on buying an intel gpu when I start to build my first all intel pc, but until then I think team amd is the way to go since my first laptop is amd.
Intel is dirt cheap when compared to Nvidia tho so I definitely accept Intel with open arms here.
That GPU costs 380$ here in Serbia. Yall got it easy
I have a a770 and there are some serious growing pains but if you can get it in sale when it goes under $300 it's worth it since the a750 is only a bit cheaper so you might as well pay a little more and get way more performance
With how I see prices, you are usually able to scrape up $20 more for an A750 which is a big jump over the A580. Good to see options at this price range though.
Bruh arca750 is 60 dollars more expensive than arca580 in my country
I’m honestly thinking about buying an intel GPU to do a intel build some time in the future
Still, that price point has me intrigued.
Just keep in mind the Sparkle Arc A580 Orc model (not the Titan) is a hot noisy mess.
Intel drivers trying to compile more than 500 Vulkan shaders without destroying the entire contents of vRAM and making the screen flash white (impossible)
I had a A770 that no posted after 2 months. Im not saying they all will and I hope they grow in quality and quantity
I personally would nvr jump team red unless something amazing happens but i do want intel to go hard and create competition because thats just going to get all of us better faster gpus
I'm currently putting a PC together and have been seriously considering an Intel GPU. It doesn't fit my needs right now, due to the driver support for older games, but future graphics cards from Intel will be worth looking out for.
I fully agree that Intel entering the GPU market will be nothing but good for consumers.
I'm a massive fan of my ASRock Intel ARC A770, it has to be the best looking card I've ever seen
Intel arc GPUs are getting better and better so it's better if you wait to buy it. Wait for future for driver updates
Actually ARC 580 really is worth it, it has dual media ecoders that thing encodes and decodes videos faster than RTX 4060ti
I have a770 16gb and its running fine
intel should include features like amd fsr and nvidia dlss otherwise it is impossible to win this race with just price/performance.
Xess is on par with amd fsr
they have their own technology, Xess which beats or is on par with amd fsr, its not very popular because few people use arc so devs won't have big support for it
It still has a lot of issues and looking at Intel right now, there is not much hope for the future investments into something that loses them money.
What parts are the best to overkill a pc with multiple monitors (like 3-4 monitors)
Im confident Intel will get their drivers together..its new tech, so problems were garunteed. Hopefully Intel develop their CPUs and GPUs to synergise and push more performance like with AMDs smart access memory.
Since we got two CPU companies(Intel and AMD if your not a computer enthusiast or don't know anything about PCs) making GPUs it would be funny to see Nvidia start making CPUs
Im holding out til intel drops their battle mage cards and maybe then itll be time to bench the old gtx 1080
i personally think that these cards are good for casual gamers since theres only a few games this year actually worth playing and they are optimized too. 8gb vram at 180$ sounds great.
Its a good alternative for a budget gaming pc
The Arc A770 costs 220 bucks, yet smashes the RX 6700 XT and RTX 3060
RX 6600 XT, not 6700. Don’t get ahead of yourself.
damn aged like milk
those cards are absolute steal rn
I bought a rig with a 3070ti last summer. At this rate, Intel is a serious option when it comes time to upgrade
The real reason why I stay away from Intel gpus is because of power draw
I've an Arc 580, AMD 8600g, 3 nvme drives, pro 620rs board and a 450w PSU by Be quiet 80 bronze. No issues at all
Battlemage is coming this year. Hopefully it can rattle AMD's cage 🤞🏿
but zack it beats the shit out of the 3050/3060/3070/3070ti in video editing and photoshop since it doesnt have only one encoder like nvidia
Jep. I don't see myself buying an Intel GPU at all.
But I really want them to bring a fight to AMD and NVIDIA, because this way especially NVIDIA needs to come up with more affordable price tags.
Thanks to the fact Nvidia market share is stupidly large compared to AMD and Intels share they got better driver debugging radeon brand had a terrible name in the past which is not a lone reason and intel not having enough users to report on issues for them to solve despite the fact they got a stupidly large devision ready to crush bugs
I put one in my little brothers pc and it runs nce as hell and i know he's gonna like it and I have the A750
7 months later, they have released too many drivers that can increase ~7% to ~63% performance in each MAJOR version and drivers are now releasing before the game is released, like nVIDIA.
intel has some massive potential to be really good in the gpu category if they keep the pricing as reasonable as the cards they have released, they just need to fix their drivers then intel could do pretty good for a budget to midrange build
I was just getting ads for that gpu on insta Wtf lol
“Make no mistake they will be a top contender soon… but they are still YEARS behind driver support.” In other words these cards are NOT worth buying!!
Does anybody else want a video about the cheapest card that is still useful for 1080p gaming?
Used: RX 580 new: arc when they fix drivers
RX580 is pretty good but a bit dated for 1080p gaming. Get a used 5700xt or 6600 for AMD and 1080ti or 1660S for Nvidia. I'd definitely say 1080ti is the best of all with that sweet 11GB of VRAM which should work at 1440p low.
@@malvinchau2056 for sure but he said cheapest so I just said the cheapest still kinda relevant card. But for sure 5500 and 6600 are better options
Yes you should be buying Intel card's!! Regardless of whether they a perfect because it's never going to get better without people buying them as no customers means no product or support for the product.. because it's a very first product it's not great because they are trying to find out how to make great hardware and software to support the hardware.. and because it's had customers look how good Intel GPUs have gotten over the last 2 years!! 100's of % better than day 1 so second generation will be way better!! And frankly the first generation hardware was as good as the competition but the software is where it struggled and it's still got plenty more to give even now.. so the answer is YES you should be buying Intel card's to strengthen them so it makes more pressure on the monopoly.
Ive got an a750 in my pc. Works great i can max out war thunder graphics, and the gpu never goes above 80 degrees and i get a stable fps (always above 100)
I have the ASRock a580 and a Sapphire Nitro 5700xt and I’m debating what one to keep right now!
Im a little hesitant to get an intel gpu because i play a lot of older games from the mid 2000s and im worried about compatibility.
i have an a750, support and playability has definitely gotten way better for older games since launch, some still don't work though so if you want peace of mind just get it from amd or nvidia.
@@giang6096 im sure eventually they will be there. Eventually ill get one to mess around with when they are pocket change money for an old card. Some of the games i care about are Sonic Adventure and Sonic adventure 2 and with games that old it really is about how long the gpu manufacturer has been around since ATI is a thing and so was nvidia
What do you think about Twisted Minds monitors? They are cheaper than ASUS & LG monitors with more HZ and Fast MS but literally Twisted Minds cost a bit of budget to build gaming PC than ASUS & LG gaming monitors! Even with the same budget!
What's the theory behind Twisted Minds monitor?
I need a Warzone computer that does 300 frames @ 1080p the game itself like a benchmark
You’d need a pretty beefy system for that. Also why would you need or want 300 fps. Pretty much no difference along as it’s over 60fps. And your monitor would also be super expensive to be able to display that.
(Rockstar probably hasn’t divulged this info yet and GTA 6 is around 2 years out for PC), but is it possible to suggest an under $800 build today which will play GTA 6 in 1080p 60 fps High whenever it releases?
Depends on prices at that point. Hopefully prices on components and electronics go down soon.
I guess 3060TI will do with something that will not choke it will get these 60 FPS on high (not max and surely no rays). Tbh you could probably get something from 40`s for not much money later on, when 50`s appear, and something like 4070 will almost 100% do it.
I remember Intel making a plan to have a GPU that undercuts and outperforms the top nvidia which I think was the 3080 at the time? What ever happened to that?
Battlemage gonna be lit
As a intel user i cant at all update my drivers with arc app always a error
Well it is nice but it's just they're improving every year so may you buy five more years it will catch up
A lot to be fixed on software part. I am ready to pay $50-$100 extra to have no issues on drivers/software part, have better control panel were settings besides Sharpness are not ignored by 90% of games, and for much better DLSS, that does not turn trees and grass into shivering shit. Yes, I have AMD now and this is for the last time.
2025 gonna be crazy for sure
had to get my A580 with $190 (1100RON equivalent, and with sales tax removed because apperently that's how it works across the pond) because the cheapest RX6600 or similar are $250
im started dropped amd gpu & nvidia
when to intel arc for budgets
and keep running the system for long time...
Can't wait for 2nd gen intel cpu's 😊
The reason why I keep watching or looking for advice from this guy is that he is NOT BIASED
Correct me if im wrong
Intel making GPU's before GTA 6 🗿🍷
Intel Arc GPU is too early in development, maybe in late 2026 it's something worth to look into
If you are gonna play matured games it’s a wise choice.
Give it a few years then it will be great