GEN120 - Universal Grammar - Part I
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- What is Universal Grammar and what are the central linguistic arguments underlying this influential model of linguistic thought? Prof. Handke seeks to answer these questions using linguistic and non-linguistic examples, but he also discusses the main problems that the current version of UG has to face.
This lecture was wonderful once again. Kindly upload the second part of it as soon as possible. Thank you!
I love the revelant metaphor that mentioned at last!
Wonderful video, I'll be looking forward to the next episode. :·)
Sir u r the greatest personalty on linguistic on youtube
Part II, please!!
Fantastic lecture! Part II, please!
Great lecture! I am a Spanish teacher and this information is invaluable!
Thank you, the overview video that everybody needs !
If by 'paradigm shift' Prof Handke means the emergence of Cognitive Linguistics, then LOL. I used to be a student of Cognitive Linguistics and spent some time and effort studying Cognitive Grammar. As far as I can see, the empirical data that cognitive linguistics have covered and successfully dealt with are still not comparable to that by generative grammar, both in scope and in depth. And Cognitive Linguistics itself faces no less problems that generative grammar does, if one gives the former some serious thoughts. Anyway, I'm expecting Part Two of this video, and thank you Professor for bringing us such wonderful courses.
You are my open window when all doors closed in my face in my master degree study❤
Thank you Prof. Handke for explaining this difficult concept to me
Thanks!
Your explanation helped me a lot.
Thank you prof. Handke! Looking forward to the second part!
Nice job! Teacher
Thank you so much for this wonderful lecture Sir…
Waiting for Part II..
Okay, so I'm not th'only one. I thought I just couldn't find it!
Thanks
Thank you so much for this lecture.
I would love to watch the part II.
Part 2, please. This was a very good lecture.
Thank you for this lecture, but if you would we need more examples about UG
Great lecture. Good work.
Great lecture.👍
Please enable community captions on your videos so I can caption them. :)
thank you it’s really good informations .. my Graduation research is about universal grammar
Hello, can you please tell me where is the part 2?
Great job
Where is the part 2 sir ? I couldn't find it.
You are wonderful
Thanks alot
Where is the second part?
Very helpful
Where is Part 2???
So Noam Chomsky is to blame for the IPA?
Where’s part 2?
Part2 please
hi teacher ı can not find about second language acquısıtıon vıdeo among your vıdeos please help me
No part 2? :(
Part 2 please :D
perfect
is there any disadvantages in UG
Love u from Pakistan
part II? :(
Hello
plz how can ask u directly
Post your question to info@linguistics-online.com and/or into the facebook group "The Virtual Linguistics Campus"
If a proposed theory can not be tested and the test repeated, it fails at being a theory.
Robbob9933 it is a field of study
Who can give me an essay about Universal grammar ?
I am confused I have to make a lesson about ug >.
How can we help?
Chomsky は英語しか知らないようだ。
generative grammar は英語に基づいた理論。
言語はもっと多様性がある。universal grammar はまだ遠いよ。
It's said that Chomsky speaks English and Spanish, understands French and knows some Hebrew. But I agree; it is a nice idea though. Thanks for giving me a small challenge to practice my Japanese!
Can't stand Chomsky.
the trend of thought that English Grammar and Syntax might be magically acquired without being directly taught to native speakers has given rise to a generation of ambiguous, tautological, and untranslatable gibberish. They are incapable of marking a relative clause or object from subject, and often mangle words. Some groups of speakers live in a bubble, many cannot process written instructions, worse, they cannot fathom spoken replies.
+Eryr Moel That's what Christopher Ellis wrote, that the "trend of thought" is what some people are theorizing, can't be magically acquired and needs to be directly taught otherwise the output result is gibberish.
Thanks
Where is Part 2 Please ?