China's SECRET $13 Billion Aircraft Carrier SHOCKED America , Iran, and Russia

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 май 2024
  • Has China threatened the United States’ sea supremacy with its newly developed aircraft carrier? Well, this might be the case because this newly developed sea beast is equipped with the required capabilities to overthrow the renowned USS Gerald and strengthen China’s naval capabilities. This unexpected development has shocked not only the United States, a nation that boasts of being at the fore-front of technological advancement but also Iran and Russia. How is this newly developed Aircraft better than the United States ship? How did the United States respond to this imminent threat?
    Subscribe Here → / @realhyperspeed
    #Hyperspeed
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 207

  • @TomSimba
    @TomSimba 14 дней назад +43

    How can a behemoth like this be a secret? China's reason for building these carriers is for defense against relentless threats from the West. The goal is not to dethrone the US, not for primacy on the seas or bullying other countries.

    • @ramiroescamilla7263
      @ramiroescamilla7263 8 дней назад +2

      A carrier is just a seating duck for Russia’s hypersonic missels

    • @FrankiePo89
      @FrankiePo89 2 дня назад

      Yes, China ramped up its military for its defense. Usa use its military to invade and STEAL.

  • @lamlawrence3539
    @lamlawrence3539 27 дней назад +39

    Is it a threat if someone better you USA ?

    • @tkh2944
      @tkh2944 День назад

      👉The great National Insecurity !?👈

  • @ymalik9813
    @ymalik9813 24 дня назад +22

    How is US navy going to pay for this as the government debt is at 34 trillion dollars and bricks and others dumping the USD

  • @user-qr7bg1oj1m
    @user-qr7bg1oj1m Месяц назад +77

    There is no video of the Ford aircraft carrier catapulting the F-35C online, only the F-18 Super Hornet fighter jet can be catapulted. The inventor of the Fujian aircraft carrier electromagnetic catapult declared that China's electromagnetic catapult technology is 10 years ahead of that of the United States.

    • @benthekeeshond545
      @benthekeeshond545 Месяц назад +4

      You are being arrogant. This is how conflicts started.

    • @zhugeliang3905
      @zhugeliang3905 26 дней назад +14

      ​@@benthekeeshond545
      You are being too sensitive.

    • @petergohtek5842
      @petergohtek5842 11 дней назад +5

      Keep it, up. China, you can build anything if have enough time

    • @petergohtek5842
      @petergohtek5842 11 дней назад +3

      Two more aircraft carriers, already, started at shipyard in northern China, must be nuclear power aircraft carriers with advance than FORD

    • @zhugeliang3905
      @zhugeliang3905 11 дней назад

      @@petergohtek5842
      Excellent development 💯

  • @jotai99
    @jotai99 Месяц назад +32

    America is always in shock ... unless they are the one and only one that rules the world.

    • @kwokholuk8723
      @kwokholuk8723 15 дней назад

      Which country wants to be no. 1 for ever?

    • @kwokholuk8723
      @kwokholuk8723 15 дней назад

      Politicians of that country still live in the 20th century.

  • @Etienne-ck3tr
    @Etienne-ck3tr Месяц назад +66

    The narrator says: "While the Fujian is a big step forward for China, it's still new to building such advances carriers, while the US has more experience, which is why the USS Ford is more capable than the Fujian". That's a pretty arbitrary and naive assumption, especially when you've admitted that many of the exact specs of the Fujian are still unknown. Typical American arrogance!

    • @joegenson9584
      @joegenson9584 Месяц назад

      Sorry America is not arrogant, it's the other way around. American and Japanese had vast experienced in building and working with aircraft carriers, more than five decades, Chinese has less than 5 years and is beginning to learn how this behemoth works and it is being build. Chinese need to eat more rice and steal plans from America before they could understand and learn how to build an aircraft carriers. Being an arrogant and a show off do not bode well with Dictator Xi, he will surely fail and be embarrassed and those aircraft carriers will be made into a floating Casinos instead as it was meant to be when they boat that old and discarded Ukrainian aircraft carrier.

    • @ramiroescamilla7263
      @ramiroescamilla7263 8 дней назад +3

      They said the same about the Abraham tank in Ukraine every one is been destroyed by Russia.

    • @patrolmanracv
      @patrolmanracv 6 дней назад +2

      its called exceptionalism ....they think they are better than everyone else ....when in fact they are not ...

    • @KondwaniLeonard
      @KondwaniLeonard 4 дня назад

      But America never win a war

  • @charlesoh14
    @charlesoh14 Месяц назад +74

    Why shock Russia and Iran? Trying to spoil close friendship. Wicked you

    • @atyafatima386
      @atyafatima386 Месяц назад +17

      Good comment. This video appears to be a US Navy PR project, designed to assure the U.S Navy, and the rest of the world that America reigns supreme where aircraft carriers are concerned. China is catching up, and fast.

    • @tgerilc2200
      @tgerilc2200 17 дней назад +5

      Yeah right..divide and rule don't work on brics..

    • @user-ed9so2rb4k
      @user-ed9so2rb4k 11 дней назад +3

      @@atyafatima386 , They are trying to get their printing press to print more green backs!

  • @lamlawrence3539
    @lamlawrence3539 27 дней назад +12

    big carrier is a sitting duck in modern warfare, it does not need a carrier to fight a carrier

  • @cheeshenglim9949
    @cheeshenglim9949 20 дней назад +10

    Not sure whether America got the money power to sustain it's military power. No money, no army.

    • @robertnowak8613
      @robertnowak8613 18 дней назад +3

      Yeah, cause China doesn't have debt -😅- and is total harmony 😅

    • @choyboonsian9060
      @choyboonsian9060 11 дней назад +1

      America very good in printing money!!😂😂😂

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 9 дней назад

      @@robertnowak8613
      Yeah but the US is broke and countries around the world are deciding that they don’t need to do business with the warmongering US anymore.

  • @argonxu1498
    @argonxu1498 Месяц назад +18

    USS Ford costs 13B USD. China's Fujian costs 50 CNY, or 7b USD

    • @geoff9858
      @geoff9858 Месяц назад +5

      too many one for you and one for me, one for everybody.

  • @user-fb4cr5kq9b
    @user-fb4cr5kq9b Месяц назад +66

    i love china i am thailand

    • @user-ji3tw6wb4r
      @user-ji3tw6wb4r Месяц назад +11

      中泰一家亲

    • @irritatedanglosaxon1705
      @irritatedanglosaxon1705 28 дней назад +8

      Me too and I'm from US

    • @robertnowak8613
      @robertnowak8613 18 дней назад +1

      You are unique in your view, other's think differently and the others are the majority....

    • @jesusvalencia3450
      @jesusvalencia3450 17 дней назад

      @@irritatedanglosaxon1705 Move to Communist China now.

    • @jackylai5718
      @jackylai5718 16 дней назад +4

      I love human...peace....I am from China

  • @GIZMO3380
    @GIZMO3380 28 дней назад +17

    😂😂😂
    How is it that China aircraft carrier Fujian a threat to US when US has 11 ACs. US which rule over the seas is not a threat to others?😂

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 25 дней назад +6

      11 carrier exist on paper only. half of them are in need of service and there is no shipyard capable of maintaining them on schedule.

  • @frankojudoka
    @frankojudoka Месяц назад +8

    I saw a video about Australia sold HMAS Melbourne to China but forgot to dismantle its catapult system. 😅

    • @johnseah5678
      @johnseah5678 28 дней назад +2

      Wasn't it the arrestor gear system that the Aussies forgot to dismantle and not the catapult system?

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Месяц назад +16

    I like it they are powerful and intelligent 😅

  • @DrTariqshabbirkhanBarbara
    @DrTariqshabbirkhanBarbara Месяц назад +14

    China is a great nation confus great history and our time tested friend

  • @thomasmurray4496
    @thomasmurray4496 Месяц назад +45

    Who has Hypersonics to take out Carriers?US don't

  • @napoleonberdos2088
    @napoleonberdos2088 24 дня назад +7

    To much talking if they wants war they should go to war but they don't have bolls

  • @eugenearokiasamy5662
    @eugenearokiasamy5662 Месяц назад +13

    Air Craft Carrier are not much use anymore with Hypersonic Missiles in the scene.

    • @AR-tf4mx
      @AR-tf4mx Месяц назад +4

      You meant China's DF-21 AIRCRAFT CARRIER HYPERSONIC MISSILES?

  • @jazening3075
    @jazening3075 Месяц назад +35

    AWESOME! GO CHINA!👍🙂

  • @user-ug4yr8er9g
    @user-ug4yr8er9g Месяц назад +17

    ВМФ НОАК 🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍

  • @davidluu3108
    @davidluu3108 29 дней назад +11

    I love you m'y nations China ❤️

  • @BobMarley-fo6cz
    @BobMarley-fo6cz Месяц назад +9

    ❤ China

  • @fookcheonkhaw7147
    @fookcheonkhaw7147 27 дней назад +4

    Fujian is using a hybrid engine with traditional and nuclear capabilities. It can travel at 55 knots per hour.

  • @do_duc8799
    @do_duc8799 Месяц назад +6

    Drones will make ships obsolete. Imagine sending 10 million lethal drones at the ships. How do you stop that..

  • @VittonLou
    @VittonLou 21 день назад +3

    Until it gets tested in War, we'll never know it's real capability. It might have the same fate as the battleship Yamato

  • @user-nd5mb3dk8u
    @user-nd5mb3dk8u 19 дней назад +19

    ❤ china from Bangladesh 🇧🇩

  • @Xyp122
    @Xyp122 Месяц назад +26

    What is the point of having an air craft carrier that is bigger n more powerful but your catapult system is not working well.
    Always need maintaining.
    China's system is more advance because it uses DC drive.

    • @JoePakoa
      @JoePakoa 12 дней назад

      Why not using them now,,,??

  • @user-ck9nl8ko6q
    @user-ck9nl8ko6q Месяц назад +4

    China has to improve more … nuclear aircraft carrier

  • @johnchow8372
    @johnchow8372 15 часов назад +1

    Like David and Goliah, Goliah is too big to miss.

  • @ericchang-ek2ee
    @ericchang-ek2ee Месяц назад +20

    中美距離十萬八千里,
    汪洋大海狂風乘巨浪,
    和平共存友好又雙贏,
    驅驅一條福建小航母,
    請不用擔心了!

    • @kwokholuk8723
      @kwokholuk8723 15 дней назад +4

      Which country wants to be no. 1 forever? Which country like to demonize and oppress the no. 2 country?

    • @henryyuen6575
      @henryyuen6575 11 дней назад +3

      中美距離十萬八千里,
      汪洋大海乘風又破浪。
      和平共存本是雙贏好,
      祇是美帝單邊好獨尊。
      驅驅福建足讓美霸憂,
      從此不可欺我大中華。

  • @user-ur4ex2nq6v
    @user-ur4ex2nq6v Месяц назад +7

    🇧🇩🤝🏻🇨🇳

  • @TheFirefox8192
    @TheFirefox8192 Месяц назад +12

    Go Dragon Go

  • @user-jy8es9xb8g
    @user-jy8es9xb8g 11 дней назад +1

    Why are you worry US have 11 and China only have 3😅

  • @lamlawrence3539
    @lamlawrence3539 27 дней назад +3

    can the nuclear power carrier run faster than a supersonic missile ?

  • @phongy45
    @phongy45 Месяц назад +6

    awesome ,,, good job

  • @sco2735
    @sco2735 4 дня назад

    The Chinese carriers are conventional fueled ships, meaning the Chinese navy is not a "blue water."

  • @ronmorris1151
    @ronmorris1151 29 дней назад +2

    The Droneage will eventually make the carrier obsolete just as thewarplane made the battleship obsolete

  • @nicolema2404
    @nicolema2404 Месяц назад +5

    AWESOME 👍👍

  • @leboon70
    @leboon70 10 дней назад +1

    A threat to war monger nation

  • @FaridKhan-sb6xb
    @FaridKhan-sb6xb 12 дней назад

    Great Country by Brilliant People ❤

  • @saysumesh
    @saysumesh Месяц назад +9

    He supposed to say india..but he is saying Iran 😂😂😂

  • @zwidedlamini2207
    @zwidedlamini2207 29 дней назад +2

    The Chinese one isbetter

  • @ahveetsoor
    @ahveetsoor 14 дней назад +1

    Stop saying secret. It's on the net.

  • @afew...enjoyments6513
    @afew...enjoyments6513 9 дней назад

    If it is anything like CCP C919, we should be worried.

  • @user-ed9so2rb4k
    @user-ed9so2rb4k 11 дней назад

    Why is China costing it in US $? It is more likely to be in RMB!

  • @feihongwong2524
    @feihongwong2524 Месяц назад +22

    this guy tried to sell us story, but the reality The F35 crashed most of the time 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @GemBeLL997
    @GemBeLL997 2 дня назад

    Menerjemahkan teks dengan kamera
    China is strengthening its military just for defense and distraction from America

  • @youngstunna1594
    @youngstunna1594 Месяц назад +1

    “The United States most powerful cargo ship”???😮😮 how dare you!!

  • @johnnylo5072
    @johnnylo5072 3 дня назад

    13 billion is RMB, not dollar

  • @sm00v00
    @sm00v00 17 дней назад +1

    Fujian serve Dim Sum US serve bacon & eggs😆

  • @HBCOU
    @HBCOU Месяц назад +1

    No mention of Daniel Duggan? 🤔

  • @leesengchoylee7228
    @leesengchoylee7228 Месяц назад +3

    China must build stronger in high technology engineering field weapons on Aircraft carrier around 10 nos and another Warship with Big Gun can fire around 2300 /3000km together with anti missile rocker for fire on submarine in 3500 dept Sea levels and Air to Air anti missile gun fire around 25000/40000 ceiling level .

  • @larrybanta8858
    @larrybanta8858 Месяц назад

    Wow that's crazy and scary

  • @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd
    @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd 11 дней назад

    $13 Billion for a smaller / non-nuclear aircraft carrier (??)

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 9 дней назад

      13 billion RMB not $, so only about $5 billion for the boat compared to $13 billion for the USA boat.
      Got to love that corruption in the USA MIC.
      The bloke in the vids got it wrong.

  • @user-og7rs2sq8u
    @user-og7rs2sq8u День назад

    Unbeatable beast❤

  • @rajlowkie6616
    @rajlowkie6616 13 дней назад

    The Story just seems ODD, because the 🇨🇳 'sCCP threatened the 🇺🇸 navy with missiles, forget about it 🎯 its targeted 🎯 .

  • @lateef_Poet_Philosopher_Verily
    @lateef_Poet_Philosopher_Verily 8 дней назад

    Aww! Hats Off To China Formidably! Ye Gospel Truth

  • @pashapasovski5860
    @pashapasovski5860 10 дней назад

    Resembles Japanese aircraft carrier flattops,hahaha

  • @QaibzooNtaustsisxaiv
    @QaibzooNtaustsisxaiv Месяц назад +15

    You better scares of Chima because you put yourself as enemies of the world

    • @petergohtek5842
      @petergohtek5842 Месяц назад

      Only hypocrite will be an enemy of China development

  • @MarkHenry-nx7ir
    @MarkHenry-nx7ir 10 дней назад

    Someone please answer me this if China 🇨🇳 came in from the front right now because Russia is in Cuba and China stuck it on the USA 🇺🇸 right now what would really happen? Please can someone answer that for me please

  • @ThePonderingPiper
    @ThePonderingPiper Месяц назад +3

    These carriers are like the dinosaurs, a dying species. They’re easy targets in this time and age…

  • @WillPenn7555
    @WillPenn7555 Месяц назад +1

    Please

  • @AllHandlesHaveBeenTaken
    @AllHandlesHaveBeenTaken 14 дней назад

    An aircraft that launches crappy planes

  • @djprentowalker8878
    @djprentowalker8878 18 дней назад

    Those ship will never build the Ford is the last ship build

  • @greggpennington966
    @greggpennington966 24 дня назад

    Seriously ? 😮

  • @suwarto3548
    @suwarto3548 Месяц назад

    China kalau tidak bisa damai dengan Amerika pasti dihabisi Amerika.

  • @JoePakoa
    @JoePakoa 12 дней назад

    United nations means the whole world,, doesn't mean two or three nations,,I love US,,

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 9 дней назад

      There are plenty of countries that disregard the UN and want nothing to do with it.

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 9 дней назад

      No it doesn’t.
      No one cares about the UN anymore…..except you.

  • @johnherr6062
    @johnherr6062 Месяц назад +2

    This is nothing sounds like it has boilers or gas turbines, it will have to be refueled about every three or four days.

  • @michaelamericanspas7549
    @michaelamericanspas7549 19 дней назад +1

    Full of shits, it is 13 billion RMB

  • @doloresfranciscobrigola3037
    @doloresfranciscobrigola3037 2 дня назад

    Ur economy is doun people need food not carrier

  • @aljusiakmujang2086
    @aljusiakmujang2086 Месяц назад +1

    Just like to compare Iphone vs China smartphone ..which one is the best ,,..

    • @leondee918
      @leondee918 Месяц назад +3

      ...and where is the iPhone produced? Ironic, no?

    • @aljusiakmujang2086
      @aljusiakmujang2086 28 дней назад

      @@leondee918 before produck in China and also China tech phone compare to iphone now

  • @user-hr7yz7op3b
    @user-hr7yz7op3b 13 часов назад

    the diff with US and China Sub is that is.. ChinaSub ios so cecret.. I know nothing I hear BNothing and the US is I know a lot ??? :)

  • @phongy45
    @phongy45 Месяц назад +1

    lol ... west always .. create ... stress ... lol

  • @thomasferrari6465
    @thomasferrari6465 Месяц назад +6

    I'm hoping that they don't decommission. These old aircraft carriers too soon. They can be turned into drone carriers and still help out the Fleet. Because it costs a lot of money to build these things and it takes a long time to get one and right now. The Chinese are out building. And I think you could probably get another 15 years usage out of this granite.It's old but still has a use for a few years more

  • @chrischen1056
    @chrischen1056 Месяц назад +3

    KJ-600 is two-generations ahead of E-2D

  • @tonysu8860
    @tonysu8860 Месяц назад +1

    U don't think the Fujian is surprising anyone considering how much China is publicizing its progress.
    But not a word about its capability can be believed until the Fujian actually demonstrates that capability.
    The EMALS cannot be assumed to oerform even like USsteam catapults until at least one and then several aircraft are launched.
    Chinese EW and radar cannot be assumed to even equal US until actually used.
    Fujian operations might not even support 49 aircraft until shiwn itherwise. Shandong and Lianong similarly demonstrate difficulty lanching a half or even a quarter of theoretically max capacity.
    For at least the next couple years no one can really say what the Fujian mught be capable of and after 6years might still consider the Fujian little more than a curiosity lwith little to no military significance like the Russian Kuznetzoff.

  • @teonorman1892
    @teonorman1892 Месяц назад +3

    Built for target practice.

  • @torccchaser6712
    @torccchaser6712 Месяц назад +1

    Tofu Dreg Aircraft Carrier

  • @user-ye9hp2lt3b
    @user-ye9hp2lt3b Месяц назад +4

    Hahaha

  • @williamblomster2387
    @williamblomster2387 Месяц назад +1

    launch and recover is underpowered...doesn`t work..a piece of junk

  • @umarjacobs7464
    @umarjacobs7464 25 дней назад +1

    China has nuclear supersonic missiles that can reach America from the south and north pole

  • @51654m
    @51654m Месяц назад +2

    What a joke...

  • @Flaco-ip7cl
    @Flaco-ip7cl Месяц назад

    Ha ha ha .. floating metal toilet

    • @leondee918
      @leondee918 Месяц назад

      When you're strong, let your enemy see you as weak

  • @biffgee6797
    @biffgee6797 Месяц назад

    Tofu dreg ship.

  • @punatangatatutai9386
    @punatangatatutai9386 Месяц назад

    Awesome copycat 🙈🙈🙈

    • @hongqi5734
      @hongqi5734 13 дней назад

      India has to go around asking for help to build it. 😂😂

  • @pbrprasad4430
    @pbrprasad4430 Месяц назад

    China lacks fine technology. This aircraft carrier may face many problem eventhough it is big

    • @YouCantHandleTheTruth.
      @YouCantHandleTheTruth. Месяц назад +5

      I come here to read Indian trolls. Tell me, what have YOU got to offer that will make the U.S. spin its head???

    • @seahengpoh9233
      @seahengpoh9233 Месяц назад +1

      tofu brsin comment

    • @hongqi5734
      @hongqi5734 13 дней назад

      India's carrier doesn't even float and the submarine doesn't surface. 😂

  • @chen-beixuan
    @chen-beixuan Месяц назад +3

    Still no nuclear powered aircraft carrier? 🤣 The world is NOT worried.

    • @samyliu
      @samyliu Месяц назад +9

      You might not know the meaning of nuclear powered vessels. In combat situation, nuclear power is helpless.

    • @chen-beixuan
      @chen-beixuan Месяц назад

      @@samyliu 13 kilometer range vs unlimited range. heLPleSS iN ComBAt SiTuatION. What do you do when you run out of fuel? 🤪 Guess what doesn't have that problem though?

    • @ftd7435
      @ftd7435 26 дней назад +3

      @@chen-beixuan Pentagon's General Austin has openly admitted US has NO DEFENSE against China's hypersonic missiles ( which was revealed by General Miller in 2022 ). So what if you have unlimited range? Chinese hypersonic missiles can still sink US carriers.

    • @gracewu4345
      @gracewu4345 22 дня назад

      ​@@samyliu Nuclear power is good for lasting power only, when battle only the fighter jets and missiles (weapons) count.

    • @samyliu
      @samyliu 22 дня назад +1

      @@chen-beixuan do you mean you need to ensure you have sufficient fuel to runaway? Yes, nuclear powered vessels have absolute advantage in navigation but not in combat

  • @paulinearcega2062
    @paulinearcega2062 Месяц назад +3

    Cheaper metal,no experienced,only movies action

  • @neilbertescalante697
    @neilbertescalante697 Месяц назад +3

    😂😂😂😂 US shock china TuFo air Craft carrier😂😂

    • @hongqi5734
      @hongqi5734 13 дней назад

      India can't even dream of building one. 😂😂

  • @allanbengtsen7991
    @allanbengtsen7991 15 дней назад

    China came crying to rosevelt and this is the thanks boycot china

  • @stevebarranco6140
    @stevebarranco6140 Месяц назад +12

    America wouldn't shock for that aircraft carrier, because we know what is made in China, made in Russia maybe but they're overrun by Ukraine, how much more china?

    • @rockstove
      @rockstove Месяц назад +8

      It is always a good thing to underestimate your potential opponent 😂

    • @bopian8913
      @bopian8913 Месяц назад

      If the US regime could not even defeat Vietnam or Afghanistan, what more China or Russia?

    • @geoff9858
      @geoff9858 Месяц назад +5

      my god, how brainwash can you be?

    • @geoff9858
      @geoff9858 Месяц назад +7

      ​@@rockstovenot underestimate, more of being brainwashed and parroting propagandists without any critical thinking.

    • @user-sv7mg6qd1w
      @user-sv7mg6qd1w Месяц назад +4

      Chinese ships lack nuclear power, and other performance exceeds that of Russia. What the United States needs to worry about is not this aircraft carrier, but that the development cycle of each generation of Chinese aircraft carriers is very short, and there have been technological breakthroughs. The evolution of Chinese aircraft carriers to nuclear The power performance will definitely surpass that of the United States. What’s even more frightening is that its productivity is 10 times that of the United States.

  • @pouwakaruwhiu8349
    @pouwakaruwhiu8349 Месяц назад +2

    It's hard to compare which Aircraft carrier is the best on the battlefield, if America goes to war with China then we will know who's got the best weapon, from Australia 🦘

    • @samyliu
      @samyliu Месяц назад +3

      I remember in the Korean war 1950-1952, the US army had the best weapons on earth. Then what...

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 9 дней назад

      Is that right Sherlock?

  • @shawnniadi4193
    @shawnniadi4193 11 дней назад

    Love ypu Chiens Chicken Dired Rice. ❤❤❤❤ From Canada

  • @chrischen1056
    @chrischen1056 Месяц назад

    Shandong is type 001A. Fujiang is type 002.
    Fijian costs between $4-5 billion, not even close to $13 billon.