@@ray.shoesmith Agreed! Clearly got the knowledge of his subject, but lacked experience in front of camera. He's really improved fast, great addition to the channel 👏
@@mad_death_0 as long as this isn't a French lesson, and since his expertise in tanks is far superior to mine, I think I'm not in the position to complain about the pronunciation of a single word.
Really growing to like Chris's videos. Hard to beat the OG David Fletcher but Chris is growing really comfortable in front of the camera and clearly knows his stuff.
@@laurentius1986I disagree, it looks pretty good for when it was made. It was a damn good tank in the hands of skilled TC. Captain Pierre Billotte took out an entire panzer company (13 panzers knocked out) all by himself in a Char B. For its time (pre WWII) it kicked!
Fun fact: They were working on an upgraded model, the B1 Ter, when WW2 hit. It removed the experimental quality hydraulic transmission based aiming, and instead had a more reliable normal transmission and the hull gun could now be traversed left and right. It was also up-armored on the sides and covered the radiator weakspot. Despite having a very small turret cannon, it's very much worthy of being called a WW2 Heavy Tank. (Early model churchhills also had a hull gun and a small, 40mm turret cannon, and "ww1 style" tracks that go around the entire tank. The same as the B1! So the B1 wasn't as "behind the times" as you might think in the era it was designed/operated. If it was ~1937, it would have been extremely competitive. And the Churchill didn't come out till later, in 1941. Though it did feature a more modern 1940 radio capable of voice communication whereas the older B1 had, IIRC, only Morse code. I believe Morse Code goes further in range than voice, but its of course, much slower to communicate.) You can google b1 ter (war thunder's wiki has a great model with pictures). I think the tank is beautiful it a sort of charming ugly way.
The downfall of all WW2 French tanks were the one man turrets. Can you imagine if you are in command of other tanks also? Trying to command your tank, find and fire at targets and then having to use tiny communication flags to give orders to your other tanks as well?
And the Tank Tactics. If the Char 1bis would have been accompanied by S-35 on their Attack they wouldn't be overwhelmed. But France didn't buy the lighter Tank in the numbers needed. Only 430 were produced. If the Government ordered more in 1938 and 1939 they could have had around 600-700 of those. And give 50 each as protection for the 3 heavy units, the S-35 was as capable as the Char Bis1 in Tank-Battle. But the biggest Probem was indeed the Universal Turret, which had to be a one Man-Turret to fit on every tank. And the Char bis1 and Somua had the luxury version, were the loader could help the Commander. There were only two competing Turret Designs and Production for all French Tanks. Both could have had a 2 man turret.
The one man turret is a reflection of the other serious problem facing France, since the end of WWI-- a serious shortage of manpower caused by the heavy casualties, both industrial accidents and combat losses. In other discussions of French tanks, it is often mentioned that a limiting factor was the pool of skilled tankers. A proper three man turret would have eliminated half of the potential tank force. There is no argument that the three man turret was more effective than the one man turret, but was a tank with a three man turret more effective than two tanks with one man turrets?
Half of the german panzer force who invaded France in may 1940 were single one-man turret just like the french tanks. But French tank designs leading up to WWII had to deal with a manpower shortage in the French Army. So many Frenchmen died in WWI, the French Army had to plan knowing they didn't have the same number of troops possible in other armies of the time. Hence why, the french made more tanks with 1 man turrets.
The downfall of all French tanks is none of them were fitted with radios and thus had no strategic or tactical situational awareness beyond what the commander could see himself. The French didn’t trust radio’s and used runners and motorcycle courier for coordination. The problem was high command actually finding their tanks once the shooting started. The GERMANS fitted the radios to the captured tanks.
@@elouenmyas580 Only the Panzerkampfwagen I had One-Man Turrets. And they were literaly driving Pillboxes with a MG. Both the S-35 and the Panzerkampfwagen II had a 3 Man-Crew: Driver, Commander + Loader/Radioman. In the German Tank the Loader/Radioman was in the Turret, in the French Tank he squatted below the turret and was only an assist Loader. A two-man turret with a better cupola with a Hatch would improved the S-35 greatly. The Cupola on the one man turret was so small, because there was no space for a bigger one. France was in transition to a 3 Man Crew from 1935 onwards, and hat some 1 1/2 man turrets (Hotchkiss-H39, AMC35, S-35, Char B1 bis). Would they embrassed it more, and made the step to a real 2 man turret, their Tanks would be much more efficient. If they had used the APX2-B turret of the AMC35 instead of the APX4 in the more modern tanks. Together with better Tactics, combining Heavy with Light Tanks, the run to Dunkirk may have been stopped. It may not have prohibited the fall of France, but certainly it wouldn't have been a 6 Week affaire more likely 3-5 Month.
These are much improved videos. Finally giving some context to why the Germans did not take the French lightly, and why the eventual French capitulation was so significant.
The way these older Great war and Inter war year tanks look is special, they seem more terrifying and monstrous in their appearance compared to later vehicles. Love Tank chats reloaded 👍
The French liked this tank so much they made the ARL 44 from it. I love the reloaded series. Can Chris look at the Jagdtiger more in depth. Also the Elefant.
ARL 44 is a nice coulda would shoulda if they were ready for WW2; but they were utterly anachronistic cr@p within the 3 years of Berlin falling; let alone when they were made some time after.
@@anasevi9456 The French new from the beguinning the ARL 44 would be outdated. The idea was not to take the time to make a good machine, but to produce anything to restart the industry after WW2. As the first tanks would have had flaws it was not a bad idea to have workers and engineers gain experience on a project that would be unlikly to ever fight. In 1945 they must have thought there won't be a war near french frontiers in the following years.
@@anasevi9456 What? None of what you said is true. The ARL 44 was NOT a pre-war design. It was the results of studies done during the german occupation and its manufacturing was realised to kickstart the french tank industries after the war. The main goal was less about designing a great tank than it was about running the factories again instead of relying on foreign exports.
These Tank Chat Reloaded videos are great. The originals by "The David" were excellent, and Mr. Fletcher's style was very enjoyable his -"There it is" were a hoot. Mr. Copson's style is different, but, I think even more informative. Like Mr. Fletcher, he knows his stuff.
I usually focus on US machines (ships, aircraft and tanks) and have always been generally curious about the Char B1. Very informative and great pace! Have been following this museum for a while, keep up the great work!!
It's nice to see a breakdown of the mechanical and human aspects of this tank. Many tanks were designed with a warfare mindset that didn't really work out. Other tanks had the same issues, but were adaptable enough (like the German Panzer III and IV's) that they could be modified or upgraded to continue fighting. I remember seeing a wrecked Char B1 in France as a kid in a museum (early 60's). The hatches were painted over and we couldn't look inside, so it's nice when you can see what the crews actually had to deal with in combat.
Excellent video Chris/Tank Museum. Chris. You're relaxing into the part with much better presentation than your earlier ones. I like the 'red indentity' additions showing the parts being talked about too. Well done !!!!! Look forward to your next one.
A fascinating tank - I always enjoy seeing it when I visit the museum. It’s surprisingly imposing, I say surprisingly as it’s small turret I think gives a false sense of size in images. Great vid.
Tanks usually look small in photos, don't they? I remember the first time I saw an Abrams in person, it looked huge! Then I quickly became used to them, like a car or a Great Dane, and no big deal. Then, I watched as one popped a wheely and tore a road in to a rooster tail as it tried to dodge RPGs and ATGMs, as I ran towards it to try to suppress launch positions. It seemed large and powerful again.
2:33 I used to play a computer game called Steel Panthers. The makers of the game always claimed they tried to make it as realistic as a game can be. If playing the Germans vs. the French in 1940, those Char B1's were almost impossible to take out...even from the sides.
Steel Panthers World At War, I lost many hours to that game back in the day. I think it was fussy about running in XP, but by 7 it wouldn't run at all. I think my best remembered match is one I used cavalry and light tanks, to cut behind the enemy lines. Swept up their HQ and artillery while a heavier assault force rolled up the enemy front line from their flank, and my artillery kept the rest of the line pinned. If I ever won a big lottery win, and decided to become a dollaraire again by creating a video game company, a modern SP:WAW would be one of the projects.
An excellent and very informative Tank Chat once again. I love the new perspective that Chris gives to these vehicles and enjoyed meeting you a couple of weeks ago. (I was the very tall Scottish guy!) Can't make Tank Fest but am very much hoping to get back to the museum as soon as I can.
Fascinating, you can only imagine the number of bruises the crew must have had traversing rough ground getting battered off the sides in such cramped conditions.
A video packed with information and details about the tank along with pictures and video of it. I like this style of revisiting a tank you had already covered.
Chris, I really like your style. You are entertaining to listen to, your French and German are clear and excellent, and you tell an interesting story. Please do more!
Excellent video! Thanks for the history! From the photos it looks like some were fitted out with a flamethrower instead of a 75mm gun. I just read that the Germans did that mod to some that they captured.
Great presentation. Really adds value seeing the inside and assessing the pros and cons of the vehicle. A tank with an engine room! Incredible. Thank you.
technically it is the rarest tank in the museum, as it is the only surviving tank used by the Germans in WWII on British soil (Jersey). my friends father Frederic Zimmer (RIP) was a mechanic with 213 here in Jersey and would have worked on this vehicle. my friend Alan actually has a jack for the Char, it might be the one that is missing from this tank?
That's hilarious, what is more hilarious is if, in seven months, no one from the museum has asked your friend and yourself to bring that jack to see if it fits . . . !
@@jeanlongsden1696 I've heard of an Isle of Jersey and also a City, but I don't know the location of the museum. I also don't know where you are, but if you think your friend might have a jack for a German-captured and refitted Char B1 bis, then I have to think you are probably somewhere in the U.K. or perhaps France, and therefore no worse than a train and a ferry away from the museum, such a heavy artifact as a tank jack being a bit awkward to haul over oceans (perhaps in an oceanic surface-freight CONNEX rented to move household goods, though)? I saw an e-mail address in the Tank Museum Chat on the Panzer III, if your friend perhaps wants to trade the jack for a lifetime all-access pass (including entering all tanks that aren't welded shut) to the museum? Maybe learn some tank restoration with the maintenance team, there has to be the occasional employer around the world for someone who has museum-quality experience with that!
That was very interesting and with a precise commentary that highlights the main points regarding the tank's design and use, looking at the Char B1 one does have to wonder why the French went for such an over specialised design when their Intelliegence services would have told them what the Pkz II, III and IV were like and also more to the point the comventional nature of their designs. They effectively built a tank that was full of Gallic flair but which contained total impracticalities like the tank not having a viable radio for radio net comms with other units and also the fixed co axial machine gun in the hull.
i've read that fuel issues were also due to the lack of crew training with fuel tanks management, as far as i understood, they were using only the auxilliary ones, hence drastically shortening the range.
Very nice video. Bovinton's B1 bis looks very clean inside. The ergonomics sound horrible for half the crew. Can't imagine the crew being at high effectiveness after 100 mile road march. The lack of a (edit: voice capable) radio results in an engagement like at Stonne: individual B1 bis dominating small numbers of German tanks bur lacking tactical coordination unable to achieve a decisive result.
Very good video, very informative with a clear knowledge of the subject and well recorded. Higlighting mechanical parts in red was a great idea to help pick out details as they were discussed. The Char B1 is one of my own favourites from the blitzkreig era and had the French made a few design changes in the testing phase it would have made a formidable opponent for the German tank crews in 1940, the main two were clearly covered here being the one man turret design and the lack of radios. I do wonder how much the layout of the Char B influenced the US Lee/Grant M3 design?
I have often wondered that, as well! Together with the (Churchill?), it seems all three were sketching a single model. I think the British tank may have been the best for war, as its ability to cross difficult terrain seems by far the best; as long as it was only expected to serve as an infantry support. The M3 Grant with its "Cadillac" crew compartment, prodigious store of ammunition, and especially in potential its stabilized assault/anti-tank gun, has pronounced advantages. On the down side, it lacked the British tank's superior frontal armor, ability to absorb damage and keep going, and vastly superior ability to maneuver across ditches and up vertical faces and mountain paths! The Char B1? Who knows? The short 75 could have been longer, but seems to have been more of a howitzer to assault fixed positions. The turreted 47 would have been vastly superior to the Grant's short 37, in the reversal of roles. The British tank's two-man turret with an anti-tank gun seems decidedly superior to both, and then it soon swapped the hull-mounted gun for a twin-mount of the very powerful Breda 8 mm machine guns that also seem to be stabilized in both elevation and traverse, which would have been a big help when crossing rough ground in the face of AT guns!
Excellent Tank Chat . I do think the Tank should be returned to original condition with German modifications removed and painted in French colours . Or if left as is it should be painted accordingly as a German Tank serving in the Chanel islands
Another very informative and well-presented Tank Chats Reloaded presentation. These Tank Museum videos are probably my favorite videos on RUclips. (My French is atrocious, but Mr. Copson may have described Gen. Estienne as "Father of the Cats." --Just would like to have a little chuckle here!)
France had the biggest Tank fleet in the world when they declared war against Germany in 1939 and marched into Germany in 1939. They would never dreamed about being defeat by the disarmed German army.
These are great videos - so informative and interesting. Really like Chris’s delivery - comes across as very authoritative and well informed, who’s really lived with tanks in the field, but all the presenters and the production values are consistently excellent. I’m planning a visit to Bovington!
The Char B used a sophisticated double differential steering that used a hydraulic motor to steer the tank with such precision the7.5cm gun could be aimed. This actually inspired the Swedish S-tank which went a step further to adjust the suspension to gain elevation as well. Unfortunately this otherwise excellent transmission gained a bad reputation (as pointed out) when medicinal instead of hydraulic grade castor oil was used. Castor oil smells quite sweet and pleasant apparently so the tank might have smelled nice.
The system was driven by a bicycle chain a crew member had to put back in place very often. Imagine doing that during combat, when you need to move around.
To be fair with the French, the British Churchill I infantry tank and the American M3 were like improved versions of Char B1. The Char B1 was already a decade old design when the British and Americans built their versions.
So it did have a coaxial to the 75 too. It seems to be sometimes forgotten in descriptions of the vehicle, maybe just because it wasn't that useful. It was nice to see photos of the original turret (with 2 MG) too, first time I see them.
The American M-3 Grant/Lee also used the French 75 mm in a sponson mount but had a 3 man turret for the 37mm anti-tank gun that could also fire cannister and HE making it preferable to the British 2 pounder as well. It also had a separate position for a 7th radio man where Char B often used signal flags. Americans loved to stick as many guns on everything as they could with an emphasis on size and crew comfort. If France had more Texans designing their tanks, 1940 might have ended differently.
8:59 A testament on just how advanced the steering systems actually were, they formed the basis of the Stridsvagn 103's minute of angle traverse gunlaying, using only the tracks of the vehicle. Sven Berge, the chief engineer at KAFT (The Royal institution supplying the Army with materiel, the "F" (fordon) indicating the vehicle department) had made quite a lot of reading of technical reports, mainly the German ones, from the war. These included things like the "effect of proportions between length and width in the manoeuvrability of tracked vehicles" (a particular problem for turretless vehicles); hit dispersion on tanks destroyed (about 60% were lost after getting hit in the turret); and a full technical evaluation of every vehicle the Wehrmacht had captured during the war. The accuracy of which the Char 2's 7.5 cm gun was so impressive that the system only needed tweaks to be fully updated to the modern technology of the early 1960's. Richard O. Lindström, being the foremost historian in Swedish armour, has an excellent article on his personal website ointres.se for those that feel confident in their Swedish or least the use off google translate.
The Somua S35 was a good tank too. The turret was very similar to the turret on the Char B1 but the tank didn't have the 75 mm hull gun. The 47 mm gun in the turret was capable of destroying pretty much all the German tanks in the early part of the war. Wouldn't have faired too well against late model panzer 4s and higher but against the panzer threes and the early model panzer fours it was adequate
May I say, I really appreciated that Chris said "B1 bis" in French? I understand *why* so many people (myself included) will revert to their native language when encountering numerals and single letters, but it's still so disconcerting when someone very carefully learns how to say "panzerkampfwagen" or "mitrailleuse" or "carro veloce" and then drops into English for the numbers.
![Jack Harlow - Hello Miss Johnson [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Q86_nlRoIGw/mqdefault.jpg)
I really enjoy Chris's presentation style. Relaxed but with obvious expertise.
He's improved immensely. He's really worked on cutting out all the 'ahhs' 👍
@@ray.shoesmith Agreed! Clearly got the knowledge of his subject, but lacked experience in front of camera. He's really improved fast, great addition to the channel 👏
Yes, absolutely. It's good that they have different presenters. They make a good mix of flavours. Tank Museum videos don't get old. 👍👍
he should learn how to pronounce "un" (one) though ; THE MOST atrocious pronounciation of this word I have ever heard.
@@mad_death_0 as long as this isn't a French lesson, and since his expertise in tanks is far superior to mine, I think I'm not in the position to complain about the pronunciation of a single word.
I really liked how mechanical pieces were highlighted when Chris discussed them. More of this please.
Agreed. To often a video details a piece of kit and you've no idea where to look.
The Tank Museums uploads are a cut above the rest.
the highlighted bits are very helpful indeed
Really growing to like Chris's videos. Hard to beat the OG David Fletcher but Chris is growing really comfortable in front of the camera and clearly knows his stuff.
I like him as much as mr fletcher just as captivating and interesting
Good tank or bad tank… the Char just looks fantastic
Looks lame.
you know that char is the french word for tank? it is the B1bis the name
Absolute badass tank.
@@laurentius1986I disagree, it looks pretty good for when it was made. It was a damn good tank in the hands of skilled TC. Captain Pierre Billotte took out an entire panzer company (13 panzers knocked out) all by himself in a Char B. For its time (pre WWII) it kicked!
@@StoptheHateJustDebatestukas: 💀
Fun fact: They were working on an upgraded model, the B1 Ter, when WW2 hit. It removed the experimental quality hydraulic transmission based aiming, and instead had a more reliable normal transmission and the hull gun could now be traversed left and right.
It was also up-armored on the sides and covered the radiator weakspot. Despite having a very small turret cannon, it's very much worthy of being called a WW2 Heavy Tank. (Early model churchhills also had a hull gun and a small, 40mm turret cannon, and "ww1 style" tracks that go around the entire tank. The same as the B1! So the B1 wasn't as "behind the times" as you might think in the era it was designed/operated. If it was ~1937, it would have been extremely competitive. And the Churchill didn't come out till later, in 1941. Though it did feature a more modern 1940 radio capable of voice communication whereas the older B1 had, IIRC, only Morse code. I believe Morse Code goes further in range than voice, but its of course, much slower to communicate.)
You can google b1 ter (war thunder's wiki has a great model with pictures). I think the tank is beautiful it a sort of charming ugly way.
The downfall of all WW2 French tanks were the one man turrets. Can you imagine if you are in command of other tanks also? Trying to command your tank, find and fire at targets and then having to use tiny communication flags to give orders to your other tanks as well?
And the Tank Tactics. If the Char 1bis would have been accompanied by S-35 on their Attack they wouldn't be overwhelmed. But France didn't buy the lighter Tank in the numbers needed. Only 430 were produced. If the Government ordered more in 1938 and 1939 they could have had around 600-700 of those. And give 50 each as protection for the 3 heavy units, the S-35 was as capable as the Char Bis1 in Tank-Battle. But the biggest Probem was indeed the Universal Turret, which had to be a one Man-Turret to fit on every tank. And the Char bis1 and Somua had the luxury version, were the loader could help the Commander. There were only two competing Turret Designs and Production for all French Tanks. Both could have had a 2 man turret.
The one man turret is a reflection of the other serious problem facing France, since the end of WWI-- a serious shortage of manpower caused by the heavy casualties, both industrial accidents and combat losses. In other discussions of French tanks, it is often mentioned that a limiting factor was the pool of skilled tankers. A proper three man turret would have eliminated half of the potential tank force. There is no argument that the three man turret was more effective than the one man turret, but was a tank with a three man turret more effective than two tanks with one man turrets?
Half of the german panzer force who invaded France in may 1940 were single one-man turret just like the french tanks. But French tank designs leading up to WWII had to deal with a manpower shortage in the French Army. So many Frenchmen died in WWI, the French Army had to plan knowing they didn't have the same number of troops possible in other armies of the time. Hence why, the french made more tanks with 1 man turrets.
The downfall of all French tanks is none of them were fitted with radios and thus had no strategic or tactical situational awareness beyond what the commander could see himself.
The French didn’t trust radio’s and used runners and motorcycle courier for coordination. The problem was high command actually finding their tanks once the shooting started.
The GERMANS fitted the radios to the captured tanks.
@@elouenmyas580 Only the Panzerkampfwagen I had One-Man Turrets. And they were literaly driving Pillboxes with a MG.
Both the S-35 and the Panzerkampfwagen II had a 3 Man-Crew: Driver, Commander + Loader/Radioman.
In the German Tank the Loader/Radioman was in the Turret, in the French Tank he squatted below the turret and was only an assist Loader. A two-man turret with a better cupola with a Hatch would improved the S-35 greatly. The Cupola on the one man turret was so small, because there was no space for a bigger one.
France was in transition to a 3 Man Crew from 1935 onwards, and hat some 1 1/2 man turrets (Hotchkiss-H39, AMC35, S-35, Char B1 bis). Would they embrassed it more, and made the step to a real 2 man turret, their Tanks would be much more efficient. If they had used the APX2-B turret of the AMC35 instead of the APX4 in the more modern tanks. Together with better Tactics, combining Heavy with Light Tanks, the run to Dunkirk may have been stopped. It may not have prohibited the fall of France, but certainly it wouldn't have been a 6 Week affaire more likely 3-5 Month.
Hello Tank Nuts! Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
These are much improved videos. Finally giving some context to why the Germans did not take the French lightly, and why the eventual French capitulation was so significant.
Chris is a great presenter, excellent diction, good speed and pace and clear competence. Thank you.
I agree.
One of the best presentations I've ever seen on the Char B1 Bis. I've never seen the interior properly like this. Excellent work, Chris!
One of my favorite tanks too....saw one running at Saumur one time.
The way these older Great war and Inter war year tanks look is special, they seem more terrifying and monstrous in their appearance compared to later vehicles. Love Tank chats reloaded 👍
I like them as i am an avid tabletop wargamer and they look likeWarhammer 40K imperial guard tanks
they kinda feel like ''Last march of the ents'' in LOTR, old heavy slow warbeasts thats not fit for the age fights their final war
@@robinburt5735 Other way around really, WH40K tanks are based off of these monsters =)
@@lavrentivs9891 Oh i know :)
The Char B in particular, it has a looming presence, like french industry is coming to crush you
Highlighting items with red is a brilliant idea!
The French liked this tank so much they made the ARL 44 from it. I love the reloaded series. Can Chris look at the Jagdtiger more in depth. Also the Elefant.
ARL 44 is a nice coulda would shoulda if they were ready for WW2; but they were utterly anachronistic cr@p within the 3 years of Berlin falling; let alone when they were made some time after.
@@anasevi9456 Yes if the ARL 44 was ready for WW2 it may have been better remembered. It was outdated badly when released.
I think it was less that they liked it, and more that it's what they had when they began development.
@@anasevi9456 The French new from the beguinning the ARL 44 would be outdated. The idea was not to take the time to make a good machine, but to produce anything to restart the industry after WW2. As the first tanks would have had flaws it was not a bad idea to have workers and engineers gain experience on a project that would be unlikly to ever fight. In 1945 they must have thought there won't be a war near french frontiers in the following years.
@@anasevi9456 What? None of what you said is true.
The ARL 44 was NOT a pre-war design. It was the results of studies done during the german occupation and its manufacturing was realised to kickstart the french tank industries after the war.
The main goal was less about designing a great tank than it was about running the factories again instead of relying on foreign exports.
That was a very thorough and enjoyable review of this famous French tank.
Thank you so much.
Another excellent presentation - i particularly like the use of colour to highlight areas being discussed - a handy innovation.
Excellent video Chris. The Char always fascinated me, it looked like a tank out of it's time, yet was surprisingly effective in battle.
Right! Show me another early 30s tank that's still effective in 39.
liked the way objects were highlighted and the narrator was the best.
These Tank Chat Reloaded videos are great. The originals by "The David" were excellent, and Mr. Fletcher's style was very enjoyable his -"There it is" were a hoot. Mr. Copson's style is different, but, I think even more informative. Like Mr. Fletcher, he knows his stuff.
I usually focus on US machines (ships, aircraft and tanks) and have always been generally curious about the Char B1. Very informative and great pace! Have been following this museum for a while, keep up the great work!!
It's nice to see a breakdown of the mechanical and human aspects of this tank. Many tanks were designed with a warfare mindset that didn't really work out. Other tanks had the same issues, but were adaptable enough (like the German Panzer III and IV's) that they could be modified or upgraded to continue fighting. I remember seeing a wrecked Char B1 in France as a kid in a museum (early 60's). The hatches were painted over and we couldn't look inside, so it's nice when you can see what the crews actually had to deal with in combat.
Excellent video Chris/Tank Museum. Chris. You're relaxing into the part with much better presentation than your earlier ones. I like the 'red indentity' additions showing the parts being talked about too.
Well done !!!!! Look forward to your next one.
I would watch documentaries with this guy all day.
Superb video. Seeing inside the vehicles is an excellent idea. Chris Copson is doing a great job. Clear, knowledgeable and concise.
A fascinating tank - I always enjoy seeing it when I visit the museum. It’s surprisingly imposing, I say surprisingly as it’s small turret I think gives a false sense of size in images. Great vid.
Tanks usually look small in photos, don't they? I remember the first time I saw an Abrams in person, it looked huge! Then I quickly became used to them, like a car or a Great Dane, and no big deal. Then, I watched as one popped a wheely and tore a road in to a rooster tail as it tried to dodge RPGs and ATGMs, as I ran towards it to try to suppress launch positions. It seemed large and powerful again.
The historical footage included with the modern walk around made this a wonderful presentation.
The highlighting in colour of various equipment and systems is really terrific and really aids in understanding the vehicle. Another top video.
2:33 I used to play a computer game called Steel Panthers. The makers of the game always claimed they tried to make it as realistic as a game can be. If playing the Germans vs. the French in 1940, those Char B1's were almost impossible to take out...even from the sides.
Steel Panthers World At War, I lost many hours to that game back in the day. I think it was fussy about running in XP, but by 7 it wouldn't run at all.
I think my best remembered match is one I used cavalry and light tanks, to cut behind the enemy lines. Swept up their HQ and artillery while a heavier assault force rolled up the enemy front line from their flank, and my artillery kept the rest of the line pinned.
If I ever won a big lottery win, and decided to become a dollaraire again by creating a video game company, a modern SP:WAW would be one of the projects.
An excellent and very informative Tank Chat once again. I love the new perspective that Chris gives to these vehicles and enjoyed meeting you a couple of weeks ago. (I was the very tall Scottish guy!)
Can't make Tank Fest but am very much hoping to get back to the museum as soon as I can.
I appreciate the way in which he gave critiques of the design without just bashing on it. This tempered, practical approach is refreshing.
I really like Chris's presentations, his matter of fact style and attention to obscure detail. Great stuff!
Very good. I appreciate the detail and Chris' precision delivering the research. Thank you Tank Museum.
So awesome to see the guts of those tanks! The Reloaded series is great!
Fascinating, you can only imagine the number of bruises the crew must have had traversing rough ground getting battered off the sides in such cramped conditions.
Loved the video.
Would also love to see the Renault FT get a similar treatment! I feel that tank deserves a lot more attention than it's getting.
The Museum of the American GI channel has a walkaround video with such a tank.
Yup ruclips.net/video/QaQI9Qgeq6M/видео.html
A video packed with information and details about the tank along with pictures and video of it. I like this style of revisiting a tank you had already covered.
I look forward to this more than pretty much any modern tank walkthrough. Incredible. Finally I get to see what this monster looks like inside.
I really like Chris's presentation and these redone tank chats.
Excellent video Chris, a comprehensive and understandable analysis of a tank that I wanted to know about, loved your presentation
Chris, I really like your style. You are entertaining to listen to, your French and German are clear and excellent, and you tell an interesting story. Please do more!
Excellent video! Thanks for the history! From the photos it looks like some were fitted out with a flamethrower instead of a 75mm gun. I just read that the Germans did that mod to some that they captured.
Cracking tank video. I really like the way Chris has researched and presented this💯
Another amazing video from The Tank Museum! Thanks so much for this one.
Best compliment I can give you Chris is, at the end I wondered had they got that video length wrong. Time does indeed fly when having fun.
Great presentation. Really adds value seeing the inside and assessing the pros and cons of the vehicle. A tank with an engine room! Incredible. Thank you.
technically it is the rarest tank in the museum, as it is the only surviving tank used by the Germans in WWII on British soil (Jersey). my friends father Frederic Zimmer (RIP) was a mechanic with 213 here in Jersey and would have worked on this vehicle. my friend Alan actually has a jack for the Char, it might be the one that is missing from this tank?
That's hilarious, what is more hilarious is if, in seven months, no one from the museum has asked your friend and yourself to bring that jack to see if it fits . . . !
@@davidgoodnow269 you do know where Jersey is and what it would take to travel to the museum ... right?
@@jeanlongsden1696 I've heard of an Isle of Jersey and also a City, but I don't know the location of the museum. I also don't know where you are, but if you think your friend might have a jack for a German-captured and refitted Char B1 bis, then I have to think you are probably somewhere in the U.K. or perhaps France, and therefore no worse than a train and a ferry away from the museum, such a heavy artifact as a tank jack being a bit awkward to haul over oceans (perhaps in an oceanic surface-freight CONNEX rented to move household goods, though)? I saw an e-mail address in the Tank Museum Chat on the Panzer III, if your friend perhaps wants to trade the jack for a lifetime all-access pass (including entering all tanks that aren't welded shut) to the museum? Maybe learn some tank restoration with the maintenance team, there has to be the occasional employer around the world for someone who has museum-quality experience with that!
Why watch TV when you've got amazing content like this on RUclips? Super interesting, great video, thankyou!
That was very interesting and with a precise commentary that highlights the main points regarding the tank's design and use, looking at the Char B1 one does have to wonder why the French went for such an over specialised design when their Intelliegence services would have told them what the Pkz II, III and IV were like and also more to the point the comventional nature of their designs.
They effectively built a tank that was full of Gallic flair but which contained total impracticalities like the tank not having a viable radio for radio net comms with other units and also the fixed co axial machine gun in the hull.
i've read that fuel issues were also due to the lack of crew training with fuel tanks management, as far as i understood, they were using only the auxilliary ones, hence drastically shortening the range.
I thought that was mainly an issue with the S35?
Pretty sure that this was for the S35 and not the B1
@@parodyclip36 It's possible i'm wrong, it was longtime ago.
I was thinking the same thing, apparently also mistakenly.
17:08 It was nice to see the inside of the Char B1, hopefully we'll see the inside of the A13 Mk II soon on the left.
Great video for a great tank, always love seeing early war tanks
Very nice video. Bovinton's B1 bis looks very clean inside.
The ergonomics sound horrible for half the crew. Can't imagine the crew being at high effectiveness after 100 mile road march.
The lack of a (edit: voice capable) radio results in an engagement like at Stonne: individual B1 bis dominating small numbers of German tanks bur lacking tactical coordination unable to achieve a decisive result.
I too, have long been a fan, thanks for the tour!
As always, you explained everything very well. Have a nice weekend
Very good video, very informative with a clear knowledge of the subject and well recorded. Higlighting mechanical parts in red was a great idea to help pick out details as they were discussed.
The Char B1 is one of my own favourites from the blitzkreig era and had the French made a few design changes in the testing phase it would have made a formidable opponent for the German tank crews in 1940, the main two were clearly covered here being the one man turret design and the lack of radios.
I do wonder how much the layout of the Char B influenced the US Lee/Grant M3 design?
I have often wondered that, as well! Together with the (Churchill?), it seems all three were sketching a single model. I think the British tank may have been the best for war, as its ability to cross difficult terrain seems by far the best; as long as it was only expected to serve as an infantry support.
The M3 Grant with its "Cadillac" crew compartment, prodigious store of ammunition, and especially in potential its stabilized assault/anti-tank gun, has pronounced advantages. On the down side, it lacked the British tank's superior frontal armor, ability to absorb damage and keep going, and vastly superior ability to maneuver across ditches and up vertical faces and mountain paths!
The Char B1? Who knows? The short 75 could have been longer, but seems to have been more of a howitzer to assault fixed positions. The turreted 47 would have been vastly superior to the Grant's short 37, in the reversal of roles. The British tank's two-man turret with an anti-tank gun seems decidedly superior to both, and then it soon swapped the hull-mounted gun for a twin-mount of the very powerful Breda 8 mm machine guns that also seem to be stabilized in both elevation and traverse, which would have been a big help when crossing rough ground in the face of AT guns!
Another excellent video. Thank Chris and team.
Excellent Tank Chat . I do think the Tank should be returned to original condition with German modifications removed and painted in French colours . Or if left as is it should be painted accordingly as a German Tank serving in the Chanel islands
Outstanding.
I could listen to CC all day long.
Probably the best review of an armored vehicle I have seen yet.
Copson is getting better and better. Keep on!
A lovely French tank, and a panzer III's nightmare.
Yeah I know, I just messed up a little bit. Lemme edit it
Thanks Chris - another cracking video!
A whole new take on this beast. Thanks!
Brilliant at what he does, and reminds me of someone you’d actually want to have as your high school principal!!!!!!
I like how they paint red the components to be easier to identify, excellent video of an underappreciated tank.
Another very informative and well-presented Tank Chats Reloaded presentation. These Tank Museum videos are probably my favorite videos on RUclips. (My French is atrocious, but Mr. Copson may have described Gen. Estienne as "Father of the Cats." --Just would like to have a little chuckle here!)
France had the biggest Tank fleet in the world when they declared war against Germany in 1939 and marched into Germany in 1939. They would never dreamed about being defeat by the disarmed German army.
Love Chris and David's Willeys videos 😊 hope David Fletcher is enjoying a well-deserved retirement .... best wishes to all
I just love this type of tank design. Oh the ideas they had...
These are great videos - so informative and interesting. Really like Chris’s delivery - comes across as very authoritative and well informed, who’s really lived with tanks in the field, but all the presenters and the production values are consistently excellent. I’m planning a visit to Bovington!
The Char B used a sophisticated double differential steering that used a hydraulic motor to steer the tank with such precision the7.5cm gun could be aimed. This actually inspired the Swedish S-tank which went a step further to adjust the suspension to gain elevation as well. Unfortunately this otherwise excellent transmission gained a bad reputation (as pointed out) when medicinal instead of hydraulic grade castor oil was used. Castor oil smells quite sweet and pleasant apparently so the tank might have smelled nice.
The system was driven by a bicycle chain a crew member had to put back in place very often.
Imagine doing that during combat, when you need to move around.
Caster oil is also a laxative. WW1 pilots had some problems because of it.
@@chefchaudard3580 There were no doubt better ways of driving a hydraulic pump.
@@williamzk9083 not really... even today, chains have not be replaced by belts or rods.
The design, however, was certainly faulty.
@@chefchaudard3580 Modern timing belts or chains seem to need replacement at 130,000km
To be fair with the French, the British Churchill I infantry tank and the American M3 were like improved versions of Char B1. The Char B1 was already a decade old design when the British and Americans built their versions.
Really enjoy Chris's commentary
What a beautiful machine
Thanks!
excellent-1930s designs have a great sci fi look to them
Excellent, clear, informative presentation, best yet in my opinion, good French and German pronunciation. Now subscribed.
B1 Bis is by far my favorite may not be perfect in every way but it was excellent with what it had!
This guy is way cooler than all the other tank dudes.
Thank you.
Great video.
Really interesting and informative to hear your thoughts regarding the Char B.
👍👍
Nothing makes my knees ache like a Tank overview. And I'm not even 40 yet nor a jogger over 70kg..
can only imagine what it's like for these experts
A great very excellent and interesting Tank Chat worth at least three cups of tea.
This is one of my all time favorite tanks
So it did have a coaxial to the 75 too. It seems to be sometimes forgotten in descriptions of the vehicle, maybe just because it wasn't that useful. It was nice to see photos of the original turret (with 2 MG) too, first time I see them.
As I recall, the coaxial for the 75 was really only intended as a targeting aid.
Excellent Chris.
Love the tank museum, thank you for the great content!
Really enjoyed the presenter! Managed to make a French tank interesting!
I love these new reloaded tank chats
Great presentation and information. I really enjoy watching your Videos. Thank you.
Great presentation ! Very enjoyable to watch
I really enjoyed this excellent video. I found it very interesting that this tank had a small door leading into the "engine Room".
A look inside the T-26 light would be awesome
The American M-3 Grant/Lee also used the French 75 mm in a sponson mount but had a 3 man turret for the 37mm anti-tank gun that could also fire cannister and HE making it preferable to the British 2 pounder as well. It also had a separate position for a 7th radio man where Char B often used signal flags. Americans loved to stick as many guns on everything as they could with an emphasis on size and crew comfort. If France had more Texans designing their tanks, 1940 might have ended differently.
Like this guy taking idk what is is but could listen to him all day
You can really tell it was built by a committee. It really looks like a collection of parts made by different manufacturer's, bolted together.
2:01- OK, I'm impressed!
One heck of an engine compartment, like that of a small locomotive !
8:59 A testament on just how advanced the steering systems actually were, they formed the basis of the Stridsvagn 103's minute of angle traverse gunlaying, using only the tracks of the vehicle.
Sven Berge, the chief engineer at KAFT (The Royal institution supplying the Army with materiel, the "F" (fordon) indicating the vehicle department) had made quite a lot of reading of technical reports, mainly the German ones, from the war.
These included things like the "effect of proportions between length and width in the manoeuvrability of tracked vehicles" (a particular problem for turretless vehicles); hit dispersion on tanks destroyed (about 60% were lost after getting hit in the turret); and a full technical evaluation of every vehicle the Wehrmacht had captured during the war. The accuracy of which the Char 2's 7.5 cm gun was so impressive that the system only needed tweaks to be fully updated to the modern technology of the early 1960's.
Richard O. Lindström, being the foremost historian in Swedish armour, has an excellent article on his personal website ointres.se for those that feel confident in their Swedish or least the use off google translate.
The Somua S35 was a good tank too. The turret was very similar to the turret on the Char B1 but the tank didn't have the 75 mm hull gun. The 47 mm gun in the turret was capable of destroying pretty much all the German tanks in the early part of the war. Wouldn't have faired too well against late model panzer 4s and higher but against the panzer threes and the early model panzer fours it was adequate
May I say, I really appreciated that Chris said "B1 bis" in French? I understand *why* so many people (myself included) will revert to their native language when encountering numerals and single letters, but it's still so disconcerting when someone very carefully learns how to say "panzerkampfwagen" or "mitrailleuse" or "carro veloce" and then drops into English for the numbers.