Fun fact. One passanger on this flight went out to the road and called a taxi and went back to Arlanda and booked a new ticket for the next flight to Copenhagen.
probably a dane. we can only stay in sweden for so long before we NEED to get out of that place :) like it's sweden what else is there to do then get away as fast as possible this is a joke, danes and swedes are allowed to make those jokes about each other
@@swedenisthemotherland3952 yep, go hide from our well fed armies in your deep dark woods like the old days denmark failed its campaigns in sweden during the Kalmar wars cause we couldn't get any food in Sweden. among other problems... even though it wasn't the reason i like to that we had food standards swedish cuisine simply couldn't meet like you only have so much nature and forest because people don't live there, will denmark have people everywhere. get livable land on a serious note though, i have always envied sweden, norway and finlands magestig and abundant natural beauty
@@temper44 how dare you keep those poor danes imprisoned in swedish occupied scania there true home is under Denmark, not under swedish occupation, you have given them stockholm syndrome (vary fitting name), they don't really love you, give them back!!! you can keep Gotland, TBH we don't really want it, but poor Scania give it back, they have lived in sweden for far too long
I think it was brave of him to admit that he would never be 100% again as a Pilot and chose to retire. He knew that other peoples lives depended upon it and he didn’t let his ego or love of flying prevent that.
@@StopWhining491 True he did everything right to prevent the accident it was proven and he know he did the right thing. Hes trust in the aircraft systems is what made him turn in hes wings. From hes explination what i belive is the real reson why he stept away is the fact that if hes in a situation again where system warnings start to happen he will question himself if they are 100% real or if there once again is some system at play that he dosent know about. They briefly mentioned hes time after the crash in the simulator and it looked like he panicked abit even if it was just 1 short clip. He lost confident in hes plane to do what he asked of it and when your responsable for 10,000´s of lifes over a long career thats not good for safety. Hes example with the car turning the other way is a good example. If u started to question if your own car could at any point invert the stearing without u knowing it, would u still drive that car daily on the highway?
Wow! I never knew that. Good for him. It breaks my heart to know that he ended his aviation career on a depressing note, but at least he's found a new passion. And most importantly, he and all of his crew and passengers survived this incident.
I’ve never seen this one before. I thought I’d seen them all. I’m so glad that everyone was okay, it must have been terrifying. Kudos to the captain for standing down when he realised he was never going to be the same again. I hope he found another passion to pursue in life.
I'm so happy to hear that. I still remember the miracle very well. 😺 Without this captain and crew the ending could have been totally horrific. I still think of the happy outcome now and then. Not many people get a second life.
@@hood_TheJoker im not that sure about that. I seen quite a few cases. But its usually just true for fairly old planes. The reason is really simple. Bow planes are simply to sturdy, so if they break up the G forces are simpky really really high. Really if we look at moste cases where there been so to say really hard emegancy landings what killed the most peopöe was fire. There is some example of planes breaking up saved lifes.
@@mightypen369 Because on a MD80 all the fuel is in the wings, and if there is no wings, there is also no fuel. And if there is no fuel, there is no fire.
@@fortnitetrashcan8308 The seats have quite a lot of flame retardant in them. And they are pretty hard to catch fire even if they didn´t have it. There need to be some original source of fire to make the interior catch fire. So for the interior to both catch fire and spreed decently fast, there need to be a ample fuel source that is airated. And that really only happen if there is fuel around. This for example can be compared to the A350 that crashed in Japan a few month back. (Japan Airlines Flight 516). While the fire was very hard to put out, it took a very lone time (like a hour) for it to totally spreed to the interior. By that point, the passengers was not only out of the plane, but already at the hospital.
One of the best episodes I’ve seen. The captain is the truest example of responsible airman. Knows he’s lost confidence in the c airframe and puts his responsibilities first and steps down. I’m sorry it came to this and I’m glad he has happy memories too. I’m all walks of life we could learn from him. Set aside the ego and do what is right. Not everyone could be as honest with themselves.
I think the entire Mayday Air Disaster is tedious to watch, overdramatized and made for people with extremely short attention span. All you remember at the end is that everything was extremely critical, extremely high-powered, extremely precarious and extremely important. And the narrator is just seething through the episode and maybe his entire career.
How many pilots have landed a plane that size without engines where everyone survived? pilots landed that brick and lived to tell the story! Captain and the crew are heroes!
You know, it’s great that no one died in this accident. However, it is also sad because the pilot (who was not ultimately to blame for the incident) had to give up the thing he loved doing. But you also have to respect him for making that decision because if he didn’t feel like he could trust the aircraft (or possibly himself), then it could prove to potentially be life saving (in a way) in the future.
I had completely forgot about this tragedy, partly because I was really young back then, but also because these brave and smart pilots managed to land so well that everyone survived! They are the pilots you wish to have every flight!
Much is probably due to the fact that the jet fuel was minus 20 degrees and that there was a lot of snow, if it had leaked a little, the snow would absorb it. Then the plane had no power that could short circuit.
The lack of fire conditions might be because the engines were off, the electrical power was mostly off, and they landed on a surface that doesn't produce sparks like a concrete runway would.
I know Stefan Gydegaard Rasmussen, he lives and is well here in Denmark in a town called Holbæk. He plays in a Jazz band (Futti-Production) 😊 He is one of the nicest people
@@Stampe-OZ0AS It's heartbreaking that he gave up life as an aviator on such a sad note, but I'm delighted that he's found a new career in life and that he's doing what he does best.
Incredible doesn't begin to describe the heroic landing that was next to my family farm! We where spending Christmas in Gottröra Hvilsten. I flew there from the south of Sweden where i lived with my 2 children. We arrived 2 days before the crash. The plain almost touched the roofs of the houses when it came down cutting the tree tops and landing on this small field. It was absolutely amazing, we couldn't understand how they could glide down so perfectly without crashing in to any houses! And then it was so calm, no hysterics. We where very shocked over what had happened. I did not fly home with my children after Christmas. It took me 15 years to gather up courage to make a short flight again. We where very upset over the speculations of the captain being responsible of the crash.
Totally understand the position the captain. He did a heroic job and didn’t lose a single passenger - great move on which to end one’s career. It’s unfortunate that he loves flying this much but as he said himself he had his great moments to think about.
A man who values trust so much, and is so confident of his abilities and integrity that he likes to keep the cabin door open strikes me as a man who would really struggle with the realization he can never really 100% trust the plane works as he expects. That he can do everything “right” and still have things go so wrong could be shattering to his world view. So I can see how he might not get over it and feel he could not be 100% ever again. At which point the same said value of trust and integrity could not permit him to take that responsibility again.
This pilot is seriously affected by this, you can see in his eyes he's broken. I hope youre doing well sir. Never forget how many lives you saved that day.
I understand perfectly well why he is devastated, it is not because of the accident, but because of the treatment he received afterwards, where everyone in SAS blamed him.
Yeah, that's correct. I am born early 92. My great grandmother lived in Gottröra, just minutes away from the accident. She told me so many stories about this miracle when i was a kid.
Reminds me so much of the Miracle on the Hudson crash, and survival! I keep that photo of all the survivors standing on the wings waiting for rescue, on the Hudson River on my screensaver. It reminds me of Jesus walking on the water. And the plane looks like a cross, with the big rudder and 2 wings....God is good. Maranatha!
This is probably one of the most amazing crashes when it comes to everyone surviving, most others I have seen had some sort of unobstructed place to land with the Hudson probably being the hardest. In this case however the captain had a forest and I doubt anyone would have even imagined everyone surviving.
Forrests are acturally safer to strafe on than landing on water! Despite the miracle of hudson, landing on water is a .. nightmare for any pilot. The problem is how water feels like concrete with that speed but not only that but one wrong angle and the engines dip into water at hogh speed and the plane oblititerates itself.. landing on water is more difficult statisticly in history of crashes compared to say forrests that soften the blow better.
For his heroism, Stefan Rasmussen was knighted by Queen Margrethe II into the Order of the Dannebrog. He was awarded the H. M. The King's Medal by King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden. He also received the IFALPA Polaris Award, IAPA Outstanding Service Award, and an Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine Laurel Award
This captain's decision to use the top of the trees to slow down its crash landing probably contributed to saving all the passengers on board the plane. That flight ended badly for no fault of his own. And yet, it cost him his career. Talk about unfair.
His body wasnt harmed, but his mind took a major dent. I know I would have as well, as would most people. Thankfully loosing your career in Scandinavia isnt an economical issue, as he would get full medical retirement.
@@GnosticAtheist my father was a fighter pilot in the pacific during World War Two. He had 2 planes shot out from underneath him. Splash down, get picked up by a ship, get another plane, fly another 50 missions. No mental gymnastics just get back up there and fight. By far not the only pilot that went through this and they all got back up and flew. Many continued to fly commercially for Delta, Pan Am, and others. Different people back then, stronger. BTW I’m Swedish, as was my Dad. So….
@OldWomanfromtheMountains also a big difference in that a fighter pilot only has their own lives on the line, an airline captain has dozens or even hundreds that could be killed. I wouldn't be surprised If they cared more about the rest dying than just themselves.
How in God's name could the manufacturer put a whole new system in place on an airplane and tell absolutely NO ONE. Did they want it to be a surprise or something?
Before I started watching this channel I never really thought about how many people are responsible for making sure a plane can safely get people from point A to point B. Bc you’re not just trusting the pilots w/your life - you’re trusting every mechanic who’s ever even TOUCHED that specific plane, the people loading baggage/cargo & de-icing your plane, every ATC who instructs your pilots, the people who wash it, every person involved in building that specific plane & programmed the computer system. And apparently also the people at the airline who are responsible for educating the pilots on computer system on that plane. Bc these pilots wouldn’t have crashed if they had all the info they should have. Amazing landing tho! I’ve also learned (watching these episodes) that there are way too many uneducated/incompetent/inexperienced/unqualified/arrogant pilots out there and I think that scares me most. These people were very lucky to have these 3 guys in the cockpit.
It both distributes the workload so one person isn't responsible for the whole thing working and having to know every tiny fact and detail, but it also increases the amount of points of failure. Since if any one of them fails to do it properly, horrible things can happen.
@@m4rt_ Which makes it even more amazing at how few plane crashes there are these days compared to the amount of planes in the sky at any given moment. These episodes that go over in-depth investigations really show how for every plane crash there is, lots of work goes into putting safeguards to prevent the same problems from happening twice. For all the hands involved, it's one of the safest ways to travel.
My grandmother just told me about this flight this weekend, apparently her brother was the pilot who managed to steer it into safety. It's frankly insane that I'm getting this recommended now.
How ironic that the company that snuck this system into the plane just happend to "take over" Boeing with their view on running things and once again put in a system in the planes that made them crash.
Considering the company retained the Boeing name, and several parts of MD was sold off after the merger, it would be silly to think that MD took over Boeing. On the other hand, the CEO from MD was the one taking over the CEO chair of the merged company. I used to work in such a company so i'm in fact inclined to agree with you.
One of the best episodes, ever! All the explanations from the investigators were easy to understand! The fact that everyone lived is proof that miracles do happen! Kudos to all involved!
What a hero, and team for their courage to do all the right things in an emergency. I remember this as if it was yesterday, I was living in Denmark at the time and I thought what an amazing feat of endurance to land a plane without any engine power. I live in Ireland now, but I fly when I'm going back to Copenhagen to visit my family with SAS.
I was just a kid at the time, but I remember this story on the news. This was such a miracle, the way it came down, how the fuselage broke apart, but still everyone survived.
Gee, a system the pilots and airlines didn't know existed needed to be deactivated to prevent a crash... Remind anyone of the Max? That's a lesson written in blood that no one seems to have recognized yet...
The most extraordinary thing about this crash which was frequently reported about in the aftermath was the one initially alleged dead/missing polish passenger. He was missing during the headcount. Later when going through records they noticed he had indeed been on the flight but then checked in at the next flight after the crash, which seemed impossible. However the explaination was that he had immediately left the crash site and gotten a lift back to the airport and hopped on the next flight.
@@vaati000 I can only find him mentioned on a Swedish forum. He was apparently called Beyron and worked for the Swedish military. They also said that he was interviewed by Swedish state radio P3 in a documentary about the crash, I haven't listend to it so I can't confirm if it's true.
When an airplane crashes and the pilots can save at least most passengers if not all of them, I give a lot of credit to the pilots. They are the ones doing what's neccessary in the cockpit for what's best for the plane and passengers.
Good job Captain, your amazing. You did everything right and everyone lived through that dangerous situation. I applaud you and the way you handled yourself. It was some computer programmer that took away your ability for you to save the airplane and that problem should be rectified. That computer should not have taken your control away from you since you where doing what was necessary to answer to the situation. Praise God for a wonderful outcome to what surely could have been a real tragedy
It was such a happy moment for all who were saved by such a great pilot and an incredibly cohesive team. Also such a sad moment for Captain Rasmussen, to give up his greatest love. His is a life to continue to be proud of, seeing from the comments, he plays music that brings happiness all around.
I think Captain Rasmussen continued to be a hero even after that doomed flight. If you know you can't perform your duties at 100%, it's not fair to anyone involved. Certainly not the passengers, but also your fellow crewmembers, and even yourself.
This situation highlights the responsibilities of airlines to ensure that there pilots have insurance cover to pay out sufficient funds that they can cover their loss of wages and give them options to pursue another professional career in the aviation world or another pathway and to not be disadvantaged in life after such a life changing event. All praise to the Captain and flight crew!!
It does, but just for information, in Sweden this is covered by taxes and is available for everyone. Noone is left to fend for their own in a situation like this.
@@Divig The pilot wasn't Swedish - he was Danish - and it's not clear from the documentary under which country's social security system he belonged. But even back then, the Swedish system did limit the amount of compensation for both direct costs and loss of income.
@@MathiasMelker yes, they limit the compensation, but noone is left high and dry. (And I used Sweden since I know our system. I believe that the danes has similar set-up as us, but I don't know for sure)
What an amazing story of survival when the odds are against you and you, and everyone survives despite the airplane being against the pilot. Unbelievable that there wasn't a Mandatory Training Expectation Alert sent out with the new device installed. Whoever was responsible for that alone should have received consequences. It is sad that this was a career ending crash even though the pilot performed heroically. Great video. One of the best I have viewed for quite some time.
This is such a diametrically opposed incident. Plane crashes, no fatalities, brought down by a safety system no one told the crew about... and Captain Rasmussen's love of flying the only casualty.
I remember this as if it was yesterday and I was close by when it happened. Another crazy thing the airliner SAS did was to paint the plane white as quickly as possible to avoid bad publicity, they didn’t want their name and logotype on the wreckage . You can see this at the end of this doc. Talk about wrong priorities. The good thing about it was that it fuelled anger and quilt was channelised towards SAS. Everyone felt that was a cheap and wrong.
Boeing evidently learned nothing from this incident when they installed MCAS on the 737 MAX. Having an automated system override the pilot's judgment is as dangerous as it is arrogant.
There are more than enough cases where overriding the captains inputs would've saved the plane. Autmatic systems arent bad by themselves, but any change need to be shown and in best case trained in a simulator. Also add it to checklists.
@@LucyKosakiautomated are not bad, automated systems that pilots are not trained to use are. In this case due to ignorance, in the case of the max for cost saving.
No, it depends. LOADS more planes are saved from crashes from systems like that than not. Airbus has an auto-pull-up system, where it pulls up automatically when it detects that the ground is too close to not pull up, despite both pilots moving the controls in a way that'll chrash the plane.
I'd say that wasn't a crash, it was a forced off-field landing. The aircraft didn't fall out of the sky, it flew and landed as a glider. The flight crew did an excellent job.
By now (though other examples) manufacturers should know that introducing any features which main function is to NOT trust the pilots should NEVER be automatic. Have horns blaring or whatever... but DO NOT take control out of his hands.
No, loads more people are saved by anti-stall/anti-crash systems than not. A lot of accidents historically have been fog crashes or stalls, where the pilots aren't aware of how close the plane it to stalling/hitting the ground, and now systems exist that totally override the pilots to prevent fatal control inputs. The pilots just need to know and be notified of the activation of the systems.
I'm a programmer, and I'm glad I don't work on code that can be the difference between life and death... I do not want that huge responsibility on my shoulders.
I bet you would have thought of a) what engine-performance data should I consider before overriding the pilot's command to throttle-down and b) how can I alert the pilot that I am overriding their command from just a few second seconds ago
At the end, it said the loss of the pilot's career, and a love affair. I was confused, because I was waiting for them to say that one of the pilots was dating a flight attendant, and they broke up. But now I'm guessing they meant the love of flying.
If Scandinavian Airlines didn't know it was added, how then, did the investigatory report condemn the cockpit crew for not knowing? If correct the 3rd pilot entering the cockpit was very valuable. He kept the pilot focused on what straight ahead. Sad that Stefan was unable to return😢
@@mariezurie7828 I think they condemned the fact that the pilots didn't know and hadn't even been made aware of it's existence rather than condemning the pilots themselves.
Very moving and human story. No annoying AI voices either; if there were A*I voices, they were not obvious. Poignant and great credit to Rasmussen and his team for maximising the survival of the passengers and crew. I just wish he had turned back sooner. Aviators, including 99.9% of cabin crews are special people. Here the bureaucracy failed them.
Thank god for brave brilliant pilots like these. What a pity that the manufacturer deemed it necessary to write a bit of code to override a pilots decision. However I’m glad that engines are no longer positioned in such a vulnerable location.
>plane made by McDonnel Douglas >contains a "saftey" computer code altering the engine power output >the crew doesn`t know it`s a thing >computer code causes a disaster >years later McDonnel Douglas merges with Boeing >Boeing is turned into McDonnel Douglas 2.0 >decades later 737MAX happens >engine power altering code labled as a "safety" messure >barely anyone knew what it did >disaster happens Lesson learned, don`t buy anything that could be traced back to McDonnel Douglas.
My heart goes out to this wonderful pilot. What a brave man. I hope he found happiness in another career and was suitably compensated by SAS. SAS had no right to modify the aircraft without training the pilots and copilots for these aircraft. I take my hat off to the flying crew. I only had a small aircraft license many years ago but I understand how the flying crew must have felt.
Another case where having a camera to view the engines from the cockpit could have helped the crew to more quickly understand what caused the engine to lose power.
This was in 1991, cameras were huge and complicated back then. Retrofitting probably won't make sense today either. However, the next totally new Airbus or Boeing airliner, likely coming in the 2030s, should have loads of cameras, no reason not to.
With all due respect, both of these replies are ridiculous! I bought a very good video camera in 1990 that was about the size of your thumb. Weighed about 3 oz. Check your “facts” before you criticize a suggestion here.
To the person who suggested that “having a camera to view the engines would pose a further danger,” what planet do you live on? Good God, doesn’t the danger of losing an airliner with 300 soles on board trump (forgive me for that word) any other potential risks???
@@sldrucker I should have said "camera system", not camera. Any useable camera at that time was analog, which would require a complicated system of tape to record or CRT to display.
I've been flying for now 8-1/2 years now and using the pine tree tops to slow down was very useful and could have been much worse. But in my years of flying I always had the cabin locked.... It's a blessing no lives lost.
Soooo great!!! I appreciate each pilot, because they do their best to solve problems in the Air. 👍👍 Amazing work!!! Thank you for these real documents.
Totally get this as a Senior Police Public Order Commander I had an unavoidable incident which involved massive media,public and professional scrutiny of my decision making - whilst I was totally vindicated I was never the same again as a commander and it pretty much ended my career and I retired not that long after. I just knew I would never do be on top of my game again and wouldn’t do the role and more importantly the people I commanded or the public justice if I continued. Just over four years later I have no regrets quitting when I did.
That is god awful when the air plane is going against what you are doing, with automatic automation and the pilot does not even know its there working against him .
Admire the pilot's skill in landing the no power plane and saved his whole passengers' lives. Watched a similar incident when the Auto-pilot decided on its own to decrease altitude without the pilot switching it on. At first he wrestled with it but suddenly the plane went up. He decided to land it on any open space as instructed by Control Tower before the Auto-,pilot played its tricks again. The pilot never returned to his flying again too.
For all things that change, some things remain the same... there are several similarities here to the 737 MAX disasters - systems installed by the manufacturer that aren't properly explained and/or documented, and the responsibility for doing the impossible is put on the crew. Thank you to the crew of SK751 for saving all the souls onboard. For all the doubts that may have arisen both then and there and in the years beyond, you are heroes. The outcome speaks for itself, and all the survivors are alive today because of you.
back in 1991 the cabin door was often open, because 911 had not happen yet, just FYI guy who narrates the video. Also kids used to get to go inside the cabin to say hello to the captains, sit in the pilot seat and given information that for most kids went inside the ears just as quick as the information would go outside the other ear, thrilling of excitement to be in a pilot seat. That's why the cabin door was open, and he had not endeared him self with the passenger, because the passengers hijacking treat was not something that was not feared until 9 years later!
I can almost guarantee you. The reason why they didn't tell them about the new system is because they didn't want people to try in throttle down just before the system kick in
Mechanical failure is always something to worry about on planes, hope fully the second engine works if not it's going to be a terrible landing period !
I was on a Lufthansa DC9 in the 1980s which developed icing on the leading edge of the wings during flight and the plane started to rock left and right. I had a window seat with good view of the wings and alerted the crew. I knew about icing issues because I used the MS flight simulator over Canada! The plane descended to a warmer altitude and reduced speed. I could see chunks of thin ice fly away. Later, the crew offered me free alcohol drinks for my help, but I opted for a quick visit to the cockpit. When I was young, I dreamed about becoming a pilot, but a military commander that I knew persuade me otherwise since I was tall and muscular. He said that I could barely fit in the cockpit of a fighter jet! Anyway, I am quite short sighted, although I have 20/16 vision.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Fun fact. One passanger on this flight went out to the road and called a taxi and went back to Arlanda and booked a new ticket for the next flight to Copenhagen.
probably a dane. we can only stay in sweden for so long before we NEED to get out of that place :)
like it's sweden what else is there to do then get away as fast as possible
this is a joke, danes and swedes are allowed to make those jokes about each other
@@crazydinosaur8945 Atleast Sweden has nature, forests and such. All of Denmark is just wheat fields.
@@swedenisthemotherland3952 yep, go hide from our well fed armies in your deep dark woods like the old days
denmark failed its campaigns in sweden during the Kalmar wars cause we couldn't get any food in Sweden. among other problems...
even though it wasn't the reason i like to that we had food standards swedish cuisine simply couldn't meet
like you only have so much nature and forest because people don't live there, will denmark have people everywhere. get livable land
on a serious note though, i have always envied sweden, norway and finlands magestig and abundant natural beauty
@@crazydinosaur8945 That does it, you guys are never getting Gotland back now!
@@temper44 how dare you keep those poor danes imprisoned in swedish occupied scania there true home is under Denmark, not under swedish occupation, you have given them stockholm syndrome (vary fitting name), they don't really love you, give them back!!!
you can keep Gotland, TBH we don't really want it, but poor Scania give it back, they have lived in sweden for far too long
I think it was brave of him to admit that he would never be 100% again as a Pilot and chose to retire. He knew that other peoples lives depended upon it and he didn’t let his ego or love of flying prevent that.
@@billrivenbark8983 : To me , that’s a REAL pilots honest assessment of the situation. Followed by the best safety decision without remorse.
How could the captain be expected to know how to handle an error in design when he'd never been apprised of it. Problem lies with Pratt Whitney.
@@StopWhining491 True he did everything right to prevent the accident it was proven and he know he did the right thing. Hes trust in the aircraft systems is what made him turn in hes wings. From hes explination what i belive is the real reson why he stept away is the fact that if hes in a situation again where system warnings start to happen he will question himself if they are 100% real or if there once again is some system at play that he dosent know about. They briefly mentioned hes time after the crash in the simulator and it looked like he panicked abit even if it was just 1 short clip. He lost confident in hes plane to do what he asked of it and when your responsable for 10,000´s of lifes over a long career thats not good for safety. Hes example with the car turning the other way is a good example. If u started to question if your own car could at any point invert the stearing without u knowing it, would u still drive that car daily on the highway?
Perfect comment!!
@@raggeragnar INDEED!
Pilot Rasmussen these days is playing jazz music giving concerts at small venues.😊
that is so cute
Nice. Saxophone player or smth?
That’s so Danish 😂
Wow! I never knew that. Good for him. It breaks my heart to know that he ended his aviation career on a depressing note, but at least he's found a new passion. And most importantly, he and all of his crew and passengers survived this incident.
43:53 As an aviation lover myself. I could feel the sadness in his eyes and voice when he had to leave aviation. 😢
So sad
yeah, I had the waterworks start up when I heard he couldn't bring himself to fly again. Gutted.
Absolutely 😢what an incredible pilot and MAN of God ❤
@@Jai_205 indeed. I solute the Captain. He did save everyone onboard👍❤
@@Jai_205 Me too. I was trying feverishly not to cry. Especially with the music underscoring it.
I’ve never seen this one before. I thought I’d seen them all. I’m so glad that everyone was okay, it must have been terrifying. Kudos to the captain for standing down when he realised he was never going to be the same again. I hope he found another passion to pursue in life.
He went into politics for a few years. Then he slid out of publicity.
Oh okay, thanks for the info. 👍🏼
Hope he continues to do well.
New one for me aswell, and I've been watching these for like 8 years at this point
He might continue flying for himself in a smaller aircraft
It's a good sign that you felt you'd seen them all. It's rare after all!
I know Stefan Rasmussen personally - he's doing great today enjoing the love of music, and making people happy 🙂
I'm so happy to hear that. I still remember the miracle very well. 😺
Without this captain and crew the ending could have been totally horrific. I still think of the happy outcome now and then. Not many people get a second life.
@@fredericia01 Has he ever flown any aircraft at all, since that day?
@@TraceUK No he has not
@@fredericia01 Does he go on trips, when someone else is flying?
He's clearly a gentle and loving soul, bless him.
it's a rare thing to have a plane break up after crashing and everybody survives.. what a lucky flight if there's such a thing after crashing
@@hood_TheJoker im not that sure about that. I seen quite a few cases. But its usually just true for fairly old planes.
The reason is really simple. Bow planes are simply to sturdy, so if they break up the G forces are simpky really really high.
Really if we look at moste cases where there been so to say really hard emegancy landings what killed the most peopöe was fire. There is some example of planes breaking up saved lifes.
How was there no fire? All planes should be constructed like this then, right?
@@mightypen369 Because on a MD80 all the fuel is in the wings, and if there is no wings, there is also no fuel. And if there is no fuel, there is no fire.
@@matsv201 fuel fire yes but other stuff can burn like the clothes, the seats, plastic etc
@@fortnitetrashcan8308 The seats have quite a lot of flame retardant in them. And they are pretty hard to catch fire even if they didn´t have it.
There need to be some original source of fire to make the interior catch fire.
So for the interior to both catch fire and spreed decently fast, there need to be a ample fuel source that is airated. And that really only happen if there is fuel around.
This for example can be compared to the A350 that crashed in Japan a few month back. (Japan Airlines Flight 516). While the fire was very hard to put out, it took a very lone time (like a hour) for it to totally spreed to the interior. By that point, the passengers was not only out of the plane, but already at the hospital.
One of the best episodes I’ve seen. The captain is the truest example of responsible airman. Knows he’s lost confidence in the c airframe and puts his responsibilities first and steps down. I’m sorry it came to this and I’m glad he has happy memories too. I’m all walks of life we could learn from him. Set aside the ego and do what is right. Not everyone could be as honest with themselves.
I think the entire Mayday Air Disaster is tedious to watch, overdramatized and made for people with extremely short attention span. All you remember at the end is that everything was extremely critical, extremely high-powered, extremely precarious and extremely important. And the narrator is just seething through the episode and maybe his entire career.
2025 still watching so sad to hear abt the captain
How many pilots have landed a plane that size without engines where everyone survived? pilots landed that brick and lived to tell the story! Captain and the crew are heroes!
You know, it’s great that no one died in this accident. However, it is also sad because the pilot (who was not ultimately to blame for the incident) had to give up the thing he loved doing.
But you also have to respect him for making that decision because if he didn’t feel like he could trust the aircraft (or possibly himself), then it could prove to potentially be life saving (in a way) in the future.
"We're crashing into the ground now".... Damn, that is a badass thing to say so calm.
Ive heard the original recording, he says it in Swedish and its way calmer in the real recording.
@@GetItOfYourChestyup we Swedes are way calmer than everyone else 🇸🇪✌🏼
@@dennisalexanderson6975
Thank you for ruining the moment.
@@dennisalexanderson6975 haha bullshit, i have a svensk friend! he's batshit crazy
@@SMGJohn haha in what way did I ruined it? The pilot were Danish by the way
I had completely forgot about this tragedy, partly because I was really young back then, but also because these brave and smart pilots managed to land so well that everyone survived! They are the pilots you wish to have every flight!
NOw there are woman pilot into the business.. and you know what could happen
This is not known as a tragedy in Sweden but as a "miracle" due to no deaths and only one severe lasting injury.
They were also lucky to find an open field in the woods.
@@bigbang6880 been female pilots for good couple decades, i get this was probs a joke but still 💀
Same here, although I was only 10 when it happened.
No fire. No fatalities. Incredible.
Was it- after the crush- luck that the fuel was very cold?
Much is probably due to the fact that the jet fuel was minus 20 degrees and that there was a lot of snow, if it had leaked a little, the snow would absorb it.
Then the plane had no power that could short circuit.
Braceing
One fatality: Captain Rasmussen's career.
The lack of fire conditions might be because the engines were off, the electrical power was mostly off, and they landed on a surface that doesn't produce sparks like a concrete runway would.
I know Stefan Gydegaard Rasmussen, he lives and is well here in Denmark in a town called Holbæk. He plays in a Jazz band (Futti-Production) 😊 He is one of the nicest people
Has he ever flown any aircraft at all, since that day?
The death toll was just one - his career as a pilot. So sad...
@@Stampe-OZ0AS It's heartbreaking that he gave up life as an aviator on such a sad note, but I'm delighted that he's found a new career in life and that he's doing what he does best.
@@TraceUK Only some small non-commercial aircraft
Salutes to you, Captain. You and the rest of the crew, are all heroes 🫡
Incredible doesn't begin to describe the heroic landing that was next to my family farm! We where spending Christmas in Gottröra Hvilsten. I flew there from the south of Sweden where i lived with my 2 children. We arrived 2 days before the crash.
The plain almost touched the roofs of the houses when it came down cutting the tree tops and landing on this small field. It was absolutely amazing, we couldn't understand how they could glide down so perfectly without crashing in to any houses! And then it was so calm, no hysterics. We where very shocked over what had happened. I did not fly home with my children after Christmas. It took me 15 years to gather up courage to make a short flight again. We where very upset over the speculations of the captain being responsible of the crash.
What a good man the captain proved to be. The whole team was splendid, responsible and humane
Totally understand the position the captain. He did a heroic job and didn’t lose a single passenger - great move on which to end one’s career. It’s unfortunate that he loves flying this much but as he said himself he had his great moments to think about.
A man who values trust so much, and is so confident of his abilities and integrity that he likes to keep the cabin door open strikes me as a man who would really struggle with the realization he can never really 100% trust the plane works as he expects. That he can do everything “right” and still have things go so wrong could be shattering to his world view. So I can see how he might not get over it and feel he could not be 100% ever again. At which point the same said value of trust and integrity could not permit him to take that responsibility again.
This pilot is seriously affected by this, you can see in his eyes he's broken. I hope youre doing well sir. Never forget how many lives you saved that day.
I understand perfectly well why he is devastated, it is not because of the accident, but because of the treatment he received afterwards, where everyone in SAS blamed him.
For us in Sweden it is called the miracale at Gottröra
Yeah, that's correct. I am born early 92. My great grandmother lived in Gottröra, just minutes away from the accident. She told me so many stories about this miracle when i was a kid.
@@khra83 and here in Denmark 🌹
I remember the cruel invitation 😢 nobody believed the pilots 😢
Reminds me so much of the Miracle on the Hudson crash, and survival! I keep that photo of all the survivors standing on the wings waiting for rescue, on the Hudson River on my screensaver. It reminds me of Jesus walking on the water. And the plane looks like a cross, with the big rudder and 2 wings....God is good. Maranatha!
@@LisKofod Same as what happened with Captain Sullenberger and his co-pilot on the Hudson landing. But they prevailed!
This video brought tears to my eyes when it was announced that everyone survived!
@@susansage7218
I know amazing and the flight attendants come into their own at these times and deserve praise too.
I'm so happy that the Captain followed his instinct, saving all lives on board
This is probably one of the most amazing crashes when it comes to everyone surviving, most others I have seen had some sort of unobstructed place to land with the Hudson probably being the hardest. In this case however the captain had a forest and I doubt anyone would have even imagined everyone surviving.
And thank God for that other pilot who came up from the passenger area to help.....he kept telling him to FOCUS on a landing spot!
Forrests are acturally safer to strafe on than landing on water! Despite the miracle of hudson, landing on water is a .. nightmare for any pilot. The problem is how water feels like concrete with that speed but not only that but one wrong angle and the engines dip into water at hogh speed and the plane oblititerates itself.. landing on water is more difficult statisticly in history of crashes compared to say forrests that soften the blow better.
Kudos to the pilots and the flight crew for a remarkable landing, saving all 127 lives!
For his heroism, Stefan Rasmussen was knighted by Queen Margrethe II into the Order of the Dannebrog. He was awarded the H. M. The King's Medal by King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden. He also received the IFALPA Polaris Award, IAPA Outstanding Service Award, and an Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine Laurel Award
It's the only time I've cried watching this series. My heart breaks for the captain.
I agree, I got a bit teary-eyed
This captain's decision to use the top of the trees to slow down its crash landing probably contributed to saving all the passengers on board the plane. That flight ended badly for no fault of his own. And yet, it cost him his career. Talk about unfair.
His body wasnt harmed, but his mind took a major dent. I know I would have as well, as would most people. Thankfully loosing your career in Scandinavia isnt an economical issue, as he would get full medical retirement.
@@GnosticAtheist my father was a fighter pilot in the pacific during World War Two. He had 2 planes shot out from underneath him. Splash down, get picked up by a ship, get another plane, fly another 50 missions. No mental gymnastics just get back up there and fight. By far not the only pilot that went through this and they all got back up and flew. Many continued to fly commercially for Delta, Pan Am, and others. Different people back then, stronger. BTW I’m Swedish, as was my Dad. So….
He only risked his own life in those crashes. Of course he did not experience the same dread of being responsible for the death of civilians.
@OldWomanfromtheMountains also a big difference in that a fighter pilot only has their own lives on the line, an airline captain has dozens or even hundreds that could be killed. I wouldn't be surprised If they cared more about the rest dying than just themselves.
@@OldWomanfromtheMountains didnt know many swedish people fought for the americans in the pacific.
How in God's name could the manufacturer put a whole new system in place on an airplane and tell absolutely NO ONE. Did they want it to be a surprise or something?
@@lesliewolfe7643 Boeing MCAS
Boeing says “hold my beer” 🍻
All they think of is money
Smh
Nowadays such "system" can easily show up as an online software update. Maybe not on planes (yet), but surely on a car like Tesla.
@5Dale65 I've never trusted Tesla as far as I can throw one.
I met Per Holmberg in 1992, he was very modest about his part
@@cykeldoktorn4241 , "Hjälten från Gottröraolyckan"
@@cykeldoktorn4241, true heroes ARE undisputedly modest 💯 and I respect them for that. 😎😎😎
Before I started watching this channel I never really thought about how many people are responsible for making sure a plane can safely get people from point A to point B.
Bc you’re not just trusting the pilots w/your life - you’re trusting every mechanic who’s ever even TOUCHED that specific plane, the people loading baggage/cargo & de-icing your plane, every ATC who instructs your pilots, the people who wash it, every person involved in building that specific plane & programmed the computer system. And apparently also the people at the airline who are responsible for educating the pilots on computer system on that plane. Bc these pilots wouldn’t have crashed if they had all the info they should have.
Amazing landing tho! I’ve also learned (watching these episodes) that there are way too many uneducated/incompetent/inexperienced/unqualified/arrogant pilots out there and I think that scares me most. These people were very lucky to have these 3 guys in the cockpit.
It both distributes the workload so one person isn't responsible for the whole thing working and having to know every tiny fact and detail, but it also increases the amount of points of failure. Since if any one of them fails to do it properly, horrible things can happen.
I was married to an ex-fighter pilot and it explains why he never went anywhere without certain tools.
@@m4rt_ Which makes it even more amazing at how few plane crashes there are these days compared to the amount of planes in the sky at any given moment. These episodes that go over in-depth investigations really show how for every plane crash there is, lots of work goes into putting safeguards to prevent the same problems from happening twice. For all the hands involved, it's one of the safest ways to travel.
@@MegaKaitouKID1412 Many people pray regularly and specifically for aviators and other high risk performers.
My grandmother just told me about this flight this weekend, apparently her brother was the pilot who managed to steer it into safety. It's frankly insane that I'm getting this recommended now.
Apparently?
@ Well not apparently, it was him. Bad choice of words on my part.
Really Enjoyed How He Kept Telling Pilot to "Look Straight Ahead" and Above All FLY The Plane
How ironic that the company that snuck this system into the plane just happend to "take over" Boeing with their view on running things and once again put in a system in the planes that made them crash.
Considering the company retained the Boeing name, and several parts of MD was sold off after the merger, it would be silly to think that MD took over Boeing. On the other hand, the CEO from MD was the one taking over the CEO chair of the merged company. I used to work in such a company so i'm in fact inclined to agree with you.
It's always ignorant in the long scheme of things, to put the love of money over the love of humanity. 😿💜😿
I've read many experts, or self-appointed experts at least, saying that while Boeing bought MD, MD's culture took over Boeing.
One of the best episodes, ever! All the explanations from the investigators were easy to understand! The fact that everyone lived is proof that miracles do happen! Kudos to all involved!
What a hero, and team for their courage to do all the right things in an emergency. I remember this as if it was yesterday, I was living in Denmark at the time and I thought what an amazing feat of endurance to land a plane without any engine power. I live in Ireland now, but I fly when I'm going back to Copenhagen to visit my family with SAS.
I was just a kid at the time, but I remember this story on the news. This was such a miracle, the way it came down, how the fuselage broke apart, but still everyone survived.
Gee, a system the pilots and airlines didn't know existed needed to be deactivated to prevent a crash... Remind anyone of the Max? That's a lesson written in blood that no one seems to have recognized yet...
Over automation can lead to reliance and complacency. Even worse is when it is unknown or forced upon an operator.
@jdrissel Yes.
MCAS anyone??
even worse, DC was a Mcdonell Dougalus plane and they were merged into Boeing
@@jdrissel max incident and this incident are related in some way
The most extraordinary thing about this crash which was frequently reported about in the aftermath was the one initially alleged dead/missing polish passenger. He was missing during the headcount. Later when going through records they noticed he had indeed been on the flight but then checked in at the next flight after the crash, which seemed impossible. However the explaination was that he had immediately left the crash site and gotten a lift back to the airport and hopped on the next flight.
Wow that's insane!!
Man's got places to be!
Is there a source? Couldn't find anything in any articles.
@@vaati000 I can only find him mentioned on a Swedish forum. He was apparently called Beyron and worked for the Swedish military. They also said that he was interviewed by Swedish state radio P3 in a documentary about the crash, I haven't listend to it so I can't confirm if it's true.
@@camelwars Hey, it's something. Thank you!
Seeing the fuselage broken open, it is amazing that passengers survived as well as they did!
When an airplane crashes and the pilots can save at least most passengers if not all of them, I give a lot of credit to the pilots. They are the ones doing what's neccessary in the cockpit for what's best for the plane and passengers.
Good job Captain, your amazing. You did everything right and everyone lived through that dangerous situation. I applaud you and the way you handled yourself. It was some computer programmer that took away your ability for you to save the airplane and that problem should be rectified. That computer should not have taken your control away from you since you where doing what was necessary to answer to the situation. Praise God for a wonderful outcome to what surely could have been a real tragedy
NO,, not a computer programmer. Such revision to engine operation, requires a corporate board decision.
It was such a happy moment for all who were saved by such a great pilot and an incredibly cohesive team. Also such a sad moment for Captain Rasmussen, to give up his greatest love. His is a life to continue to be proud of, seeing from the comments, he plays music that brings happiness all around.
The pilots stayed calm and landed the plane properly under the circumstances.
I think Captain Rasmussen continued to be a hero even after that doomed flight. If you know you can't perform your duties at 100%, it's not fair to anyone involved. Certainly not the passengers, but also your fellow crewmembers, and even yourself.
Massively addicted to this program. And I don't even fly!!
This situation highlights the responsibilities of airlines to ensure that there pilots have insurance cover to pay out sufficient funds that they can cover their loss of wages and give them options to pursue another professional career in the aviation world or another pathway and to not be disadvantaged in life after such a life changing event. All praise to the Captain and flight crew!!
It does, but just for information, in Sweden this is covered by taxes and is available for everyone. Noone is left to fend for their own in a situation like this.
@@Divig The pilot wasn't Swedish - he was Danish - and it's not clear from the documentary under which country's social security system he belonged. But even back then, the Swedish system did limit the amount of compensation for both direct costs and loss of income.
@@MathiasMelker yes, they limit the compensation, but noone is left high and dry. (And I used Sweden since I know our system. I believe that the danes has similar set-up as us, but I don't know for sure)
This one and the Gimli glider, 2 incredible pilots,also the Alaska one with the hole in the floor. Amazing
and the Aloha one with the 737 convertible.
Transat was also great
thank You for exiting video.What a fine crew!
exciting rather than exit ing.
What an amazing story of survival when the odds are against you and you, and everyone survives despite the airplane being against the pilot. Unbelievable that there wasn't a Mandatory Training Expectation Alert sent out with the new device installed. Whoever was responsible for that alone should have received consequences. It is sad that this was a career ending crash even though the pilot performed heroically. Great video. One of the best I have viewed for quite some time.
Take care of yourself Captain Rasmussen. You are a great person.
This is such a diametrically opposed incident. Plane crashes, no fatalities, brought down by a safety system no one told the crew about... and Captain Rasmussen's love of flying the only casualty.
I remember this as if it was yesterday and I was close by when it happened. Another crazy thing the airliner SAS did was to paint the plane white as quickly as possible to avoid bad publicity, they didn’t want their name and logotype on the wreckage . You can see this at the end of this doc. Talk about wrong priorities. The good thing about it was that it fuelled anger and quilt was channelised towards SAS. Everyone felt that was a cheap and wrong.
I praise these pilots even the one that got up out his seat he definitely helped
Boeing evidently learned nothing from this incident when they installed MCAS on the 737 MAX. Having an automated system override the pilot's judgment is as dangerous as it is arrogant.
@@BalancedByte indeed
There are more than enough cases where overriding the captains inputs would've saved the plane. Autmatic systems arent bad by themselves, but any change need to be shown and in best case trained in a simulator. Also add it to checklists.
The madness continues.
@@LucyKosakiautomated are not bad, automated systems that pilots are not trained to use are.
In this case due to ignorance, in the case of the max for cost saving.
No, it depends. LOADS more planes are saved from crashes from systems like that than not. Airbus has an auto-pull-up system, where it pulls up automatically when it detects that the ground is too close to not pull up, despite both pilots moving the controls in a way that'll chrash the plane.
I'd say that wasn't a crash, it was a forced off-field landing. The aircraft didn't fall out of the sky, it flew and landed as a glider. The flight crew did an excellent job.
I bet if you were on that plane, you would feel differently 😂
By now (though other examples) manufacturers should know that introducing any features which main function is to NOT trust the pilots should NEVER be automatic.
Have horns blaring or whatever... but DO NOT take control out of his hands.
No, loads more people are saved by anti-stall/anti-crash systems than not. A lot of accidents historically have been fog crashes or stalls, where the pilots aren't aware of how close the plane it to stalling/hitting the ground, and now systems exist that totally override the pilots to prevent fatal control inputs. The pilots just need to know and be notified of the activation of the systems.
Much respect to that pilot.
I'm a programmer, and I'm glad I don't work on code that can be the difference between life and death... I do not want that huge responsibility on my shoulders.
I bet you would have thought of a) what engine-performance data should I consider before overriding the pilot's command to throttle-down and b) how can I alert the pilot that I am overriding their command from just a few second seconds ago
At the end, it said the loss of the pilot's career, and a love affair. I was confused, because I was waiting for them to say that one of the pilots was dating a flight attendant, and they broke up. But now I'm guessing they meant the love of flying.
That pilot is the Swedish Sully. Both had their engines fail, both landed in a dangerous condition, and everyone survived.
Except he's Danish. His co-pilot was however Swedish.
@@akyhne lol
He was a great captain even in his retirement! :O
If Scandinavian Airlines didn't know it was added, how then, did the investigatory report condemn the cockpit crew for not knowing? If correct the 3rd pilot entering the cockpit was very valuable. He kept the pilot focused on what straight ahead. Sad that Stefan was unable to return😢
@@mariezurie7828 I think they condemned the fact that the pilots didn't know and hadn't even been made aware of it's existence rather than condemning the pilots themselves.
Right. It was the airlines fault. No one was made aware of this new piece of equipment, no procedures given and so the airline was found at fault
@@gaylealleluia8392 quite an oversight huh?
@@rachmunshine9474 For real!
@@gaylealleluia8392 Who added the ATR without saying ?
The pilot is clearly a God fearing man. God was with them!!
Very moving and human story. No annoying AI voices either; if there were A*I voices, they were not obvious. Poignant and great credit to Rasmussen and his team for maximising the survival of the passengers and crew. I just wish he had turned back sooner. Aviators, including 99.9% of cabin crews are special people. Here the bureaucracy failed them.
Post traumatic stress disorder.
LoL.
@@marksamuelsen2750 is that funny?
Exactly what I commented 😢they were emotionally scared for life😢
For real
@@marksamuelsen2750 "LoL" ???? the captain has PTSD, that’s why he can’t fly anymore. nothing is funny here.
An unknown system! Deja Vu. We don't seem to have learnt much. Like the art of communication can save a lot of grief.
I have been to this plane crash site and it hardly 30 min from where i live and once u r there u will realise how lucky 129 passengers were.
The Pilot in him died in that crash but he himself survived.
@@Keilen10 His work was done. Literally.
Thank god for brave brilliant pilots like these. What a pity that the manufacturer deemed it necessary to write a bit of code to override a pilots decision. However I’m glad that engines are no longer positioned in such a vulnerable location.
>plane made by McDonnel Douglas
>contains a "saftey" computer code altering the engine power output
>the crew doesn`t know it`s a thing
>computer code causes a disaster
>years later McDonnel Douglas merges with Boeing
>Boeing is turned into McDonnel Douglas 2.0
>decades later 737MAX happens
>engine power altering code labled as a "safety" messure
>barely anyone knew what it did
>disaster happens
Lesson learned, don`t buy anything that could be traced back to McDonnel Douglas.
@@MrFi-es2ie Two JT8 engins wiped nearly out of the same time is very bad luck
"The most painful thing for a pilot is when he loses his wings and all he can do is stare at the sky from below."
My heart goes out to this wonderful pilot. What a brave man. I hope he found happiness in another career and was suitably compensated by SAS. SAS had no right to modify the aircraft without training the pilots and copilots for these aircraft.
I take my hat off to the flying crew.
I only had a small aircraft license many years ago but I understand how the flying crew must have felt.
brave man really in both the flight and retiring.
One of our🇩🇰 biggest heroes of All time ❤️🙏🏼
Much respect for the pilot!
What happened to captain hamborg? Nobody has mentioned him. He helped them and he was very straight to the point. God bless him.
* Holmberg, Capt. Per Holmberg.
The Miracle att Gottröra. God touched SAS that day.
There is no God
@@gdansk12349God bless you.
@@johankaewberg8162 SAS var där snabbt och målade över logotyperna på sidorna för att rädda varumärket. Men ändrade sig sen 😅
Another case where having a camera to view the engines from the cockpit could have helped the crew to more quickly understand what caused the engine to lose power.
Another case of having a camera to view the engines would have posed further danger.
This was in 1991, cameras were huge and complicated back then. Retrofitting probably won't make sense today either. However, the next totally new Airbus or Boeing airliner, likely coming in the 2030s, should have loads of cameras, no reason not to.
With all due respect, both of these replies are ridiculous! I bought a very good video camera in 1990 that was about the size of your thumb. Weighed about 3 oz. Check your “facts” before you criticize a suggestion here.
To the person who suggested that “having a camera to view the engines would pose a further danger,” what planet do you live on? Good God, doesn’t the danger of losing an airliner with 300 soles on board trump (forgive me for that word) any other potential risks???
@@sldrucker I should have said "camera system", not camera. Any useable camera at that time was analog, which would require a complicated system of tape to record or CRT to display.
I've been flying for now 8-1/2 years now and using the pine tree tops to slow down was very useful and could have been much worse.
But in my years of flying I always had the cabin locked....
It's a blessing no lives lost.
This is why I hate so-called safety assistance in cars these days. Especially when you can't override them.
Soooo great!!! I appreciate each pilot, because they do their best to solve problems in the Air. 👍👍 Amazing work!!!
Thank you for these real documents.
Typical big firms to instantly try to blame pilot or crew for perhaps making mistakes. Instead of thinking they might have made a mistake themself.
I know it is untrue but after watching this series 'state of the art' sounds a lot like 'X days until retirement'.
Ive never wanted to give soneone a hug so bad, bless his heart
Totally get this as a Senior Police Public Order Commander I had an unavoidable incident which involved massive media,public and professional scrutiny of my decision making - whilst I was totally vindicated I was never the same again as a commander and it pretty much ended my career and I retired not that long after. I just knew I would never do be on top of my game again and wouldn’t do the role and more importantly the people I commanded or the public justice if I continued. Just over four years later I have no regrets quitting when I did.
it was a remarkable landing!!
That is god awful when the air plane is going against what you are doing, with automatic automation and the pilot does not even know its there working against him .
Vad bra alla överlevde❤❤❤😊😊😊
Admire the pilot's skill in landing the no power plane and saved his whole passengers' lives. Watched a similar incident when the Auto-pilot decided on its own to decrease altitude without the pilot switching it on. At first he wrestled with it but suddenly the plane went up. He decided to land it on any open space as instructed by Control Tower before the Auto-,pilot played its tricks again. The pilot never returned to his flying again too.
For all things that change, some things remain the same... there are several similarities here to the 737 MAX disasters - systems installed by the manufacturer that aren't properly explained and/or documented, and the responsibility for doing the impossible is put on the crew.
Thank you to the crew of SK751 for saving all the souls onboard. For all the doubts that may have arisen both then and there and in the years beyond, you are heroes. The outcome speaks for itself, and all the survivors are alive today because of you.
back in 1991 the cabin door was often open, because 911 had not happen yet, just FYI guy who narrates the video. Also kids used to get to go inside the cabin to say hello to the captains, sit in the pilot seat and given information that for most kids went inside the ears just as quick as the information would go outside the other ear, thrilling of excitement to be in a pilot seat. That's why the cabin door was open, and he had not endeared him self with the passenger, because the passengers hijacking treat was not something that was not feared until 9 years later!
umm there were hijackings before 9/11
I can almost guarantee you. The reason why they didn't tell them about the new system is because they didn't want people to try in throttle down just before the system kick in
Mechanical failure is always something to worry about on planes, hope fully the second engine works if not it's going to be a terrible landing period !
The ice was hiding in plain sight clear to the naked eye unnoticeable omg, how can a person get over that ?
Salute this crew.
Great Captain!
Wow- it's absolutely insane that the pilots weren't informed of this new system!!! And that is what caused the accident?? That is absolutely madness.
I was on a Lufthansa DC9 in the 1980s which developed icing on the leading edge of the wings during flight and the plane started to rock left and right. I had a window seat with good view of the wings and alerted the crew. I knew about icing issues because I used the MS flight simulator over Canada! The plane descended to a warmer altitude and reduced speed. I could see chunks of thin ice fly away. Later, the crew offered me free alcohol drinks for my help, but I opted for a quick visit to the cockpit. When I was young, I dreamed about becoming a pilot, but a military commander that I knew persuade me otherwise since I was tall and muscular. He said that I could barely fit in the cockpit of a fighter jet! Anyway, I am quite short sighted, although I have 20/16 vision.
Always a great series.
Much respect to the captain.