@@sebastiandomagala9233I clicked this comment to type exactly the same. Sampras was the Federer before Federer. Fed is amazing, no lie. But Sampras was elegant and graceful.
There isn't one player on the planet who Federer didn't school at least once. I mean - the way he could make it look so simple when he was on. I loved every second of these displays of skill, aggressiveness, creativity and athleticism
@@andreaho roddick was good with Gilbert as his coach, his game I suppose got more versatile with Larry Stephanke; Came close to winning Wimbledon, barely lost to Federer. But roddick didn’t win much after Federer took over, you’re right
you have to remember that Federer had outrageous serving stats. for years he was right at the top of the game for aces and service game wins. he was up there with roddick and isner at their peak
Being one of the best returners and - tactically speaking - arguably the best server is what makes Federer so special; "beating him with his own weapon" is basically impossible because of that.
Hurkacz is not a "servebot", he's a complete player, not rarely spectacular. Maybe you think that everyone with a good serve is a "servebot", in that case: my bad!
I was coming into the comments to type this. I don’t know him well, but just based on those clips, the guy has more than serves. He took 4 sets from Federer on that first set and had several good rallies and plays that didn’t involve the serve
He was so good from Dubai to Wimbledon of 2019 truly played some wonderful ball at a few months shy of 38. Wimbledon always will be etched in people's minds but gets lost in the shuffle he was also a couple points away from winning the sunshine double (arguably should’ve done it tho domi was great even with Fed having his chances in that IW final)
I think the best example of a servebot is John Isner. People call Ivo Karlovic a servebot, but he was more of an old-school serve and volley player...he actually was a good volleyer. Isner could serve, and that's it. I do think Raonic was pretty much a servebot, but yes, he did have a pretty decent forehand also.
Roger Federer has the best serve of all time! Modeled after Pete, he made it more versatile and clutch. Many times he was 2 points from losing and would fire an ace, occasionally off the 2nd serve; & yes trolls I know he lost to joker with wimby on his racket. But joker is the best returner ever, so…
Most people forget Federer was a serve bot too, with the amount of precision and disguise he had. Too bad for most players he was a bot in every other aspect of the game as well. I stopped watching tennis after this great man left the scene... Tennis hasn't been the same since his retirement and will probably never be 😢
Hurkacz, Raonic, Anderson... None of them should be considered as servebot, the title is just ridiculous. Of course, they are big servers, all of them like to aproach to the net, but for me, servebots are players like Karlovic, Isner, Cressy or Querrey.
Kevin looked too sour at the net handshake. Did he really think he had a legit chance in that match? Yes, he beat Roger at that Wimbledon marathon match and kudos for that even if it was a fluke. So, get real, snowball's chance in hell.
Against the biggest servers, Federer was the best. Even his losses came often on clay (Isner in 2012 DC, Kyrgios Madrid) when the serve didn't matter as much
Federer is an amazing returner . If not for the freak Novak whose returns r otherworldly federer would sure be one of the finest returners of the game n that too being a one-handed backhander . Just imaginr returning a 150 mph with one hand compared to two hands .
SO tired of the servebots, and so gratifying to see them slowly being evolved out of the game. Can you imagine paying a thousand bucks for a great seat at a big match, just to end up essentially watching nothing more than a serving exhibition?
thank god novak and nadal came along to save tennis from FEdersqaush ..fed turned tennis into a popularity /pagenatry contest to sell more watches and running shoes....Fed's weak mental game and backhand couldn't compete agaisnt novak
Federer was a great player, and he looked even better without proper competition.Of course, when first Nadal and then Novak came along, many realized that Roger, perhaps, is NOT the greatest of all time by far, like his lifelong loyal fans would like you to believe.
Fedsqaush was dominated by his 2 rivals Nadal/Djoki overall in his career. He only won 33% of his GS matches agianst them! THAT IS FAILURE..H2H has alosing record agaisnt both, couldn't even beat nadal once at french, Lossed to djoki 3 times at wimbledon finals in a row on Fed's supposed best SURFACE!! 50% of feds titles were on the B circuit 250/500..Fed was weak mentally ,weak backhand, never evolved his sqaush game, didn't think when he played..he got lucky 2003-2009 goldilocks era where got some game going but once the real players like novak/nadal came along fed wilted and resorted to his running shoe and watch selling...DJOKI IS TENNIS where he fine tuned every part of the game to a level no one even come close...Fed just wasn't a bright player his armchair tennis fans turned him into a pagaentry
So Rafael Nadal wasn't playing between 2003-09??? Despite being 5 years older & in his twilight Nadal lost the last 7 of their H2H matches after Federer improved his backhand!!! Prior to Federer turning 34 he was ahead in his H2H with Novak!!!
No one can play like Federer. So beautiful, so graceful, Federer Forever.
Sampras could.
Yes I really miss Roger being on tour. One of a kind.
@@sebastiandomagala9233I clicked this comment to type exactly the same. Sampras was the Federer before Federer. Fed is amazing, no lie. But Sampras was elegant and graceful.
There isn't one player on the planet who Federer didn't school at least once. I mean - the way he could make it look so simple when he was on. I loved every second of these displays of skill, aggressiveness, creativity and athleticism
He did give both his greatest rivals Rafa & Novak some bagels.
Had to watch it with the volume, because let's be honest that is one of the most satisfying parts about it.
Everyone speaks of Federer serves, he is one of the best returner of serves, that’s how he handled most big servers well.
Yup! He embarrassed Roddick most of the time
@@0ldMatty2 Roddick had been a serving bot until Roger joined the game. Honestly, he's one of the greatest of every skill.
@@andreaho roddick was good with Gilbert as his coach, his game I suppose got more versatile with Larry Stephanke;
Came close to winning Wimbledon, barely lost to Federer. But roddick didn’t win much after Federer took over, you’re right
you have to remember that Federer had outrageous serving stats. for years he was right at the top of the game for aces and service game wins. he was up there with roddick and isner at their peak
The mark of a master.
It all looks so smooth and easy.
❤Master at work! Thank you very much for the memories Rodger Federer
Against „big servers”would be more acurate, the title
He'll always be my goat
Being one of the best returners and - tactically speaking - arguably the best server is what makes Federer so special; "beating him with his own weapon" is basically impossible because of that.
So so good to see the maestro in action, he is SO missed🇨🇭🐐👑
I miss Roger
Hurkacz technically is not a serve bot. His game is so much more!
The maestro..the one and only. 👌👍
Hurkacz is not a "servebot", he's a complete player, not rarely spectacular. Maybe you think that everyone with a good serve is a "servebot", in that case: my bad!
Yeah he definitely isn’t a servebot
Servebot: Isner, Opelka, Karlovic
he is a servebot
I was coming into the comments to type this. I don’t know him well, but just based on those clips, the guy has more than serves. He took 4 sets from Federer on that first set and had several good rallies and plays that didn’t involve the serve
Hurkasz is very good. Much more than a servebot.
He was so good from Dubai to Wimbledon of 2019 truly played some wonderful ball at a few months shy of 38. Wimbledon always will be etched in people's minds but gets lost in the shuffle he was also a couple points away from winning the sunshine double (arguably should’ve done it tho domi was great even with Fed having his chances in that IW final)
None of these players is a serve bot, which makes it even more impressive how Roger smashed them
I think the best example of a servebot is John Isner. People call Ivo Karlovic a servebot, but he was more of an old-school serve and volley player...he actually was a good volleyer. Isner could serve, and that's it. I do think Raonic was pretty much a servebot, but yes, he did have a pretty decent forehand also.
The REAL goat in action!
Nah, big clumsy serve bots are not going to beat a healthy and fit Fed, and these clips show how underrated Fed's return game is.
I thought this was going to be a mega man legends meme
Roger Federer has the best serve of all time! Modeled after Pete, he made it more versatile and clutch.
Many times he was 2 points from losing and would fire an ace, occasionally off the 2nd serve; & yes trolls I know he lost to joker with wimby on his racket. But joker is the best returner ever, so…
Neither Raonic nor Hurkacz are serve-bots but Federer was just on another level to them.
Most people forget Federer was a serve bot too, with the amount of precision and disguise he had. Too bad for most players he was a bot in every other aspect of the game as well. I stopped watching tennis after this great man left the scene... Tennis hasn't been the same since his retirement and will probably never be 😢
what a legend
Serve is critical part in tennis. Being able to serve fast and cover up other shortages is nothing to laugh about. Be more respectful.
Hurkacz, Raonic, Anderson... None of them should be considered as servebot, the title is just ridiculous.
Of course, they are big servers, all of them like to aproach to the net, but for me, servebots are players like Karlovic, Isner, Cressy or Querrey.
Tall and big server= servebot nowadays it seems
If they use big serves consistently with no variety in their games they are serve bots
Kevin looked too sour at the net handshake. Did he really think he had a legit chance in that match? Yes, he beat Roger at that Wimbledon marathon match and kudos for that even if it was a fluke. So, get real, snowball's chance in hell.
Roger almost served like a servebot himself.
Against the biggest servers, Federer was the best. Even his losses came often on clay (Isner in 2012 DC, Kyrgios Madrid) when the serve didn't matter as much
Federer is an amazing returner . If not for the freak Novak whose returns r otherworldly federer would sure be one of the finest returners of the game n that too being a one-handed backhander . Just imaginr returning a 150 mph with one hand compared to two hands .
Roanic moving in slow motion.
It seemed to me that Nadal & Djokovic find a way to beat big servers, but Federer preys on big servers. Except Paris 2018 against Isner.
Novak learnt how to return so that the server was not able to win the point
If only I could unwatch clickbots.
Федерер прекрасен
“Serve bot” is such a demeaning term. There’s nothing wrong with having a big serve, even if that is basically your only weapon
Exactly. There’s no difference between having a serve as a weapon and having good net skills as a weapon
I wish his last match against Hurkacz had the same result as this one. Same goes for Anderson although he made did make amends for that L.
I think federer was the servebot in that match against raonic lol
servebots, return nots
SO tired of the servebots, and so gratifying to see them slowly being evolved out of the game. Can you imagine paying a thousand bucks for a great seat at a big match, just to end up essentially watching nothing more than a serving exhibition?
I miss the days when Federer would win a game faster than Nadal can unpick his wedgie
1:32 If anyone ever wonders why Federer's backhand has more power than Wawrinka's.
tf Hurkacz is not a servebot
Now do the one where Isner beat Federer in 4 sets on clay
since when hurcach is a servebot. he is a good allaround player.
Hurkacz is definitely not a servebot
8-7 40-15
thank god novak and nadal came along to save tennis from FEdersqaush ..fed turned tennis into a popularity /pagenatry contest to sell more watches and running shoes....Fed's weak mental game and backhand couldn't compete agaisnt novak
Did you get a check from Andy Roddick yet? If not, it's in the mail. I'm sure he's grateful for being excluded from your video. 😁
Milos Raonic a good player looks bad because Federer. That player ranked 3° once and earned more than 20 million u$s.
As soon as you see a canadian tennis player, just stop watching
Felix? Bianca?
What kind of logic is that?
Haha 😂
No1vak has one career loss against Canadian players, and
that was to Felix in an exhibition
match.
Well Raonic defeated Federer in Wimbledon 2016. so he can do something
since when is Hurkacz a "servebot"??? You lost me at that point; I turned it off
Lol, none of those guys are servebots. What are you smoking?
Like when he got triple bagelled by a 16 year old hurkacz at his best slam?
that’s NOT what happened 😉😘
these servebots got no movement comapred to servebots Medvedev
Meddy is not a serve bot . He is what I would say baseline bot
Federer was a great player, and he looked even better without proper competition.Of course, when first Nadal and then Novak came along, many realized that Roger, perhaps, is NOT the greatest of all time by far, like his lifelong loyal fans would like you to believe.
serve bots are talentless
Rao didn't seem to any balls , too new for a big game
Fedsqaush was dominated by his 2 rivals Nadal/Djoki overall in his career. He only won 33% of his GS matches agianst them! THAT IS FAILURE..H2H has alosing record agaisnt both, couldn't even beat nadal once at french, Lossed to djoki 3 times at wimbledon finals in a row on Fed's supposed best SURFACE!! 50% of feds titles were on the B circuit 250/500..Fed was weak mentally ,weak backhand, never evolved his sqaush game, didn't think when he played..he got lucky 2003-2009 goldilocks era where got some game going but once the real players like novak/nadal came along fed wilted and resorted to his running shoe and watch selling...DJOKI IS TENNIS where he fine tuned every part of the game to a level no one even come close...Fed just wasn't a bright player his armchair tennis fans turned him into a pagaentry
if what you were saying was true, which it wasnt, why did you feel the need to ad hominem attack 10-15 times in one comment?
ur cute@@Andreabay90
@@Andreabay90because he’s a braindead child
So Rafael Nadal wasn't playing between 2003-09???
Despite being 5 years older & in his twilight Nadal lost the last 7 of their H2H matches after Federer improved his backhand!!!
Prior to Federer turning 34 he was ahead in his H2H with Novak!!!
disgraceful title; if it's so easy you could probably be a ""servebot" yourself