@@ButterNutter37 the Volvo passed here Tesla didn’t. You don’t want to hit and the car be thrown 45° over. That causes major brain injuries. You want it to break away. Volvo still has better safety than Tesla.
@@kingsolo6241 so you want the car to keep moving to crash again? But on the second crash the front as already absorved an impact so it's damaged and can't take all the kinectic energy from a second crash. NHTSA gives the lowest probably of injury to the Tesla it's just data, data proves that the Tesla is safer and that is a fact, just admit it. With my knowledge from being a mechanical engineer student I think you are wrong but I would love to learn more about why the Volvo is safer. If the data was on your side I would say you are right but it's not. You know better than the engineers at EuroNcap and NHTSA right?
@@megabeam the Tesla’s rear end swung out into oncoming traffic sideways for a potential side impact now. Volvo has already proven itself in a front impact so no problem if it has another at a decreased after the initial impact.
I feel like in certain situations it'd be more dangerous to keep rolling. Like on an interstate or highway, or maybe on a bridge. But in every other situation I agree.
@@jasondrown9087 Which one? 140km/h to a wall and die 99% 140km/h bounce off and get dropped in to a lake where depending how calm you are and know how go get out of a submerged vehicle decides your faith. I mean of course if you want to die you would take that 140 to 0 in milliseconds as you don't get to feel much, drowning is a horrible way to go.
@@jasondrown9087 it hardly rolled past, Besides hitting something like that is very unlucky… I mean when was the last time you saw someone hit an unmovable wall with the corner of there car head on… Only thing I can think of is a building or maybe a pillar
@@redgator7250 It just depends on where/how it happened. I'm just stating that as a possibility. A lot of different scenarios can happen. And I'm not saying "oh this is dangerous why would they do that," I'm just stating that sometimes still rolling, regardless of how far, could be potentially dangerous to other people as well. For instance a head on collision, your car doesn't stop and rams into a group of pedestrians on the sidewalk.
Volvo has always prided itself on safety. The came up with the three point seatbelt. After seeing how important it was. Gave it away so every manufacturer could implement it. It's how they came up with their logo.
@@dinkoblazek9637 if that was even remotely accurate volvos would have a significantly higher crash test rating, fact of the matter is, in every single state and city in the nation you’re more likely to see a new fiat than a new volvo 😂 volvos are outrageously overpriced pieces of trash
@@coreymarshall229 you're forgetting that you get the maximum safety, Android based infotainment systems, triple and quadruple zone climate controls and it genuinely has a better interior than a Tesla or a fiat. Think about that
The volvo did better as it managed to deflect the impact and not stop. That is less energy transmitted to the occupants. The windshield on the volvo didn't break.
@@Bubby74 According to Tesla. According to the crash testers these are both 5 star cars. Tesla has gotten in trouble for saying otherwise. Just like they're in trouble again for their claims about self-driving
Tesla on average has a consistently higher crash test rating than volvo lmfao. Tesla’s are far safer cars. Tesla focuses on the complete aspect of the vehicle. Hence the cost of repair being on average cheaper over 10 years than even a toyota camry. The fact at 40-50g you get a faster more cost effective car than any other manufacturers..etc… no fan boy shit either, this is all indisputable and easily provable lmao
Yeah, I do not see your point. Volovs roof just bent on impact. And like another comment said, I would rather have a closer moment with my steering wheel rather have an engine in my lungs. Can you explain how did you get the conclusion that the dummy got squeezed? Edit: just got a closer look and the steering wheel did NOT MOVE AT ALL.
@@meriofrog 1st how could u even see in it there was just airbags 2nd i dont think the pillars on the tesla are supposed to be a crumple zone and i didnt see any engine enter annyones lungs today
@@__Mantis__ I never said Teslas weren't safe dude, I said Volvo is known for having some of the safest cars, I don't know why you sent me that link, since I never insinuated that Teslas are worse 🤷♂️
Shows that the Volvo is the safer car.. What kills you in an accident ist the deceleration. The Teslas cabin crashes into the obsticle and hooks the car to a complete stop, while the Volvo bounces off. The impact in the Tesla is worse. Cars have crumble zones which get comoletly destroyed in an accident. The volvos off falling wheel isn't something bad.
So why does Euroncap and NHTSA give a better score and the lowest probability of injury to the Tesla? Unlike you data doesn't lie. But let me guess you know better than the engineers working at these crash labs right?
@@meisterkenobicrypto Der Test von dem du redest bezieht sich auf Tesla Model X (spitzenmodell SUV) und Volvo s60 (kleiner Mittelklasse SUV). Und selbst da hat der Volvo besser abgeschnitten, denn: Im Tesla Betrug die Beschleunigung des Dummys am Kopf 63G. Ab 50G stirbt ein Mensch mit hoher wahrscheinlichkeit. (Aber das weist du als angehender Spitzen Ingeneur der Automobilbranche natürlich) Im Volvo betrug die Beschleunigung am Kopf nur 9G. 7 x 9G = 63G Der Aufprall im Tesla war also 7 mal so schwer für die Insassen! Punkt. Elon musk hat das Ergebnis einfach nur zu seinen gunsten ausgelegt. Er sagt den Laien Kunden einfach: "guck, der Tesla sieht heiler aus." Und das ist genau dass was der von dir angesprochene "score" besagt. Der tesla hat nach dem unfall über 90% seiner ursprunglichen Form, der Volvo "nur noch" 74% seiner ursprünglichen form... Aber wie bereits im ersten kommentar erwähnt, geht es nicht darum wie sehr das Auto von außen beschadigt wird, sondern darum wie viel davon auf die Insassen übertragen wird. Von diesem Standpunkt aus betrachtet, ist der Tesla noch schlechter als aktuelle Ford und Fiat modelle. Es geht nicht darum wie gut das Auto den unfall übersteht, sondern es geht um die Insassen. Diese sind im Volvo nach wie vor am besten geschützt, dicht gefolgt von Toyota, Mercedes, BMW und VW.
I’ll take the Volvo any day! I’ve been in car accidents with alot of Volvo’s and they all did their jobb perfectly when it comes to keeping me alive! Sweden produces alot of amazing products that american companies can only dream of making themselves. If you want a safe car then there can only be one car brand and that is VOLVO!!!!!!
@@sdsfghr i mean depends i would say sweedish cars are the best (in my opinion) cause Volvo are the safest cars in the world and Koininsegg have broke so many records over the time they have been producing cars but German cars are great aswell lots to choose from in the German roster
Tesla has more solar panel complaints but complaints about cars are typically few. Tesla has corrected much more than people think, own 2. 😘 - i’ve had volvos before as well…main difference, i’d never buy a volvo again for myself or anyone - overpriced walmart car 😂😂😂
They should add few stars to that rating system. Volvo goes above other manufacturers with their safety stuff. Maybe not the prettiest or fastest cars but let me tell you if i should crash i wish it was in a volvo.
@@eggsycro well to be fair volvos have gone down the shitter when it comes to reliability and service cost. It's just fact. I've worked at a few dealerships for an fyi
The Tesla performed wurse. The test clearly show the abrupt stop of the Tesla while the Volvo deflected the power and did not stop. It did so by loosing the tire.
Volvo is branded worlds safest mass produced car for a reason. If I remember correctly they've "sworn" to never have anyone die in an officially branded volvo car or something like that.
I remember reading by 2025 that volvo says no one will die in an accident in a volvo! I hope it goes well for them! Love how safe their cars are! But I could never afford one!
Allot of forces in the tesla, the ovlov does a great job deflecting impact forces. Its great that volvo has made such a great example that other cars are now catching up.
Volvos are solid, they’ve consistently done well in NCAP tests for years! We call them Tanks as if you crash into a Volvo you’re gonna come off worse 🤣
@@meriofrog what he means is that the crumple zone got caught on the obstacle causing a sudden stop and thus more Gs for the passengers of the car. The volvos crumple zone allowed the car the slide off of the obstacle without causing a sudden stop.. Its obvious that the volvo did better when considering the safety of the passengers.
@@W--ko9ms The Most important thing read the rest of the comment after this: What if you get into a car accident and the Volvo slides off and goes directly into a tree? Read the rest.. Well, first, that's how it was made to perform, second, how do you kow how many g's the poeple experienced. The Volvo and many other cars are made to slide off or minimize the impact as much as they can because it has very little space to crumple because of the engine, and i suppose that you do not want an engine in your lungs. The Tesla has a much larger crumple zone, thus, absorbing more impact, that's why it pushes you back. What if you are in a crash and the car slides and doest not stop, thus, sliding directly into a tree? That's 2 impacts isn't it? Or worse, what if it collides with another car or another HUMAN, killing that person at hight speed. Edit: And the fact that the Tesla model s has a 6.3% injury rate proves and confirms the fact that the crumple zone DOES absorb a lot of impact.
@@meriofrog 2 seperate impacts would still put less stress on the human body than one big one. You are correct on the sliding and hitting other humans or objects. That is however, in my opinion, a matter of ethics rather than safety. Should a car stop on impact to keep others safer or subdivide the impact into multiple smaller impacts to keep the inhabitants safer.. It is well known in motorsports that the longer a a crash takes the higher the chance of survival is because the forces the driver experiences are spread out over time. Edit: I can't type properly.
@@YungEagle3k That's a Scania logo not Saab, I know they look pretty much a like but the badge where the animal emblem is on is a dead give away it's a Scania
Both were good... Truth is the gone off wheel of Volvo helped it skid to right, while the intact wheel of Tesla made it to come to a stop.. So don't argue
I had a Volvo 5cylinder turbo with 500 000km on it which for a turbo car is pretty unheard of and it was pretty quick for the tank that it was plus the interior was immaculate and everything worked
The Tesla may have absorbed the blow and lessened passenger injury but I will always be amazed at how volvo is able to make their cars as safe as they are, we have an xc60, super comfortable and pleasant to drive but it’s built like a rock, that is shows by how that s90 collides with the barrier and just pushes away from the point of collision whereas the Tesla slams into it.
Nothing compares to a Volvo. I'm alive today because of my 1986 740 gle. I was rear ended at 75mph and lost control of the car. The right rear wheel slammed into raised median which should have flipped my car off the freeway. The panhard bar absorbed the most of the impact keeping me on the road and out of a 70 ft fall.
The impact in the Volvo ist not as high as in the Tesla. So the chance of surviving this "small overlap" crash ist much higher in the Volvo than in the Tesla.
You don't see the way that the body is designed to push it away from the wall instead of slamming into the corner? Pretty much all Volvos since the early 2000s were designed that way
That showed me nothing. Whats to compare, the way the Volvo rebounded like it should? Every car is designed to crunch and rebound in their own way. I want to see the data between the two.
It’s well known to people living in Denmark and Sweden that volvo is a strong car. I’ve been told that the car was reinforced so the driver wouldn’t get injured if they hit a deer (Sweden have some large woods). The also said it in a danish move where they’re going to drive the car into a brick wall to rob the place. The driver don’t want to do it, and is scared that the car won’t hold, his mates just replies “But it’s a Volvo?”
My mom had 3 accidensts in ger volvo xc60 in last 6 months. Fortunately they were quite mild. She was rear ended 2 times by idiot drivers and once a lady bumbed into ger car at a parking spot. Those 2 times she was rear ended she had only minor dents in her bumper but tge 2 other cars were quite fucked up. Yeah I'd take the volvo any day.
See, in a sense the volvo crash is actually safer because rather than an abrupt stop it used the body of the car to slowly slide, this could reduce the chances of a critical injury in a crash like that.
My friends Volvo is amazing. Last time we were going to get into a car accident and the Volvo braked, locked the seat belt and tightened the seat belt and push me back. I have a model 3 and it doesn’t do that. I was like wow. Felt so safe in it. I love my Tesla but the Volvo was something else. I got goosebumps
@@Iegend17 i have a Volvo V40 R design and i love it it feels so safe passenger seats and all, but if u like ur tesla keep it bro this other guy prob has an old fiat panda not a new Volvo🤣 teslas are safe aswell, honostly very close behind Volvo, Stay happy bro
Yeah and thats an old volvo, Volvo have been making great safe cars for years i love my V40 R design but damn that 850 is so great its reliable, safe, fast and nice to be in
In all fairness @AndriusJuskevicius we don’t know the internal dispensing in either vehicle , stopping on impact is a much better feature if it was designed to do so, the people in the crashed vehicle will be impacted either way no need for them to mow down a crowd of people near by. Volvo has always had amazing safety standards it’s interesting to see the safety comparison to newcomer Tesla who touts a big game on safety. Either way I’ll wait for the VTOLs 😅
See, the trick is to not crash. That’s why I drive a dangerously fast car that I know I’ll die in if I crash like this because it puts your LIFE on the line.
Yeah... How about the roof on you Volvo bending on impact, how about that? And I think you are a little bit more stupid here, the weel shattering does not have an impact on the safety of the driver. A more realistic example is the side crash test where the fucking pillar got in to the car and replaced the driver.
@@meriofrog you want the wheel to brake away and the car to slide away from the center of collision as statistically having a car remain at center of collision is primary cause of secondary collisions. Volvo has a better system for protecting the passengers in the cabin that Tesla’s honestly trash way of using the battery pack as part of the structure can’t compete with. It’s called SIPS, Side Impact Protection System. And not all for side impacts but is optimized for it. Allows the cabin to basically “float” separately during a crash. Say inpact is brutal the system will recognize how brutal it was and way angle it’s from and how fast impact occurred and direction computer instantly calculated how much of the airbags to deploy (can deploy airbags slower, faster or even pop them twice). The seats and center console will actually move as needed as well. SIPS will also engage ROPS and WHIPS system all at the same time. ROPS is roll over Protection system, basically uses antilock brakes, sensors around it like speed sensors, yaw rate sensors and so on and measures the acceleration on the suspension to change how they will compensate with the 4C chassis. If you have a convertible volvo like C70, it also deploy the roll bars above your head and roof line. The WHIPS system is anti whiplash system, basically takes impact measurements, calculated velocity, delta in velocity, angle, direction, and can deploy airbags in seats individually as much as it needs, slams the pretensioner on belt very tightly to force you locked into your seat, minimal movements. WHIPS can if decides appropriate based on situation fire explosive bolts in seats to collapse it to a specific degree as well.
@@meriofrog the roof bends slightly in to help with impact if u have ever sat in a volvo u would know they are very sturdy ur just jealous that ur mams minivan will split in 2
@@milissadeering1027 Are we talking about my 'mams' minivan or a car that completely shits on your Volvo? "Ur just jealous", that's the most 12 year old line I've ever heard, you can not come up with a better argument so you just say that and baam, cool kid, won the argument... No.
I think this crash test is one of the few where a Volvo beats the Tesla. It didn’t stop completely and hense did not face as syrong impact. Reason being that the battery is so stiff and hard on a Tesla that it stops the whole car. It’s an advantagein other tests though as it will not roll over as easily as a Volvo on side impact. Both are good cars in terms of safety.
@@meriofrog yeah its a safety feature all volvos come with that as standered look at all our EU cars and then look at a Ford mustang yeah im gonna go with Volvo, Volswagan and audi on this one
@@milissadeering1027 Ya know what they say, "Its not a bug, it's a feature", in this case, "It's not that our car is trash and bends on impact, ITS A SAFETY FEATURE" LMAO IM DYING. Edit: You do know how stupid you sound when you say that the car's FUCKING ROOF BENDING ON IMPACT it's a SAFETY feature, right ?.
@@meriofrog That's called impact absorption. There are 'crumple zones' that are designed to absorb impact while protecting the occupants and cabin. Volvo sets the standard as far as safety and everyone else tries to follow. Suppose you got into this accident, would you care if the roof crumpled and kept you safe? Both vehicles are totaled anyway, so it's protection of the occupants that matters and you can clearly see the Volvo defects off and takes far less overall inertia. The damage is calculated since those crumple zones will only crumple so much.
What da hell is wrong with those comments??!🙆🤬 First: Have u ever seen a perfectly straight crush onto something that has a rectangular shape? Me neither. Most of objects have rounded corners which allows for vehicles to slide when impact is one-sided. Second: Tesla has their stiff battery pack that lowers the center of mass and makes vehicle zone hard to penetrate by stationary objects. Gass car can NEVER reach this due to their construction. Third: regardless of moderate speed non of the vehicles passenger zones were damaged. Which means that we have all of the people alive inside both cars with high probability. Which, again, means that "GOOD JOB FOR BOTH OF THE VEHICLES", not only for Volvo, wtf guys🤷🤷🤷
Ok im no expert but both seemed to do pretty well overall. The crumple zones crumpled and absorbed energy but no crushing of the passenger cell. Volvo might have the edge, love to get to see photos of interior after.
a new car built by a company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should they initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, they don't do one
Ppl in comments trying to say that full stopping is better than letting the car go further... Please go to school... Its not that hard to learn pshysics... VOLVO XC90 has 0 deaths on records
A small over lap crash involves hitting 25% of the front side of the car. The angles are the same. The difference is in how the frames of the 2 vehicles are designed and one was clearly designed better for this crash. I hope you’re sharp enough to be able to tell which one that is.
Volvo for the win via not bearing all force and then pivoting , deflection wins. Fluke or angular corner design in cabin envelope frame of Volvo??? Thoughts??
Volvo design cars with safety inmind The volvo here is designed to deflect some of the impact and making the impact rate as smooth as possible Seatbelts were first used in volvo cars and then made mandatory ide take any volvo over tesla tesla may be OK but volvos better
Volvo for 60 years has made the safest cars for families on the world.
Until Tesla came along. Data doesn't lie.
@@ButterNutter37 the Volvo passed here Tesla didn’t. You don’t want to hit and the car be thrown 45° over. That causes major brain injuries. You want it to break away. Volvo still has better safety than Tesla.
@@kingsolo6241 Agreed
@@ButterNutter37 Elon Musk fooling you guys, open your eyes.
@@kingsolo6241 so you want the car to keep moving to crash again? But on the second crash the front as already absorved an impact so it's damaged and can't take all the kinectic energy from a second crash. NHTSA gives the lowest probably of injury to the Tesla it's just data, data proves that the Tesla is safer and that is a fact, just admit it. With my knowledge from being a mechanical engineer student I think you are wrong but I would love to learn more about why the Volvo is safer. If the data was on your side I would say you are right but it's not. You know better than the engineers at EuroNcap and NHTSA right?
The sudden stop after impact is what causes injuries. The occupants of the Volvo would’ve come out better.
But the car can now drive into oncoming traffic or a tree
@@megabeam the Tesla’s rear end swung out into oncoming traffic sideways for a potential side impact now. Volvo has already proven itself in a front impact so no problem if it has another at a decreased after the initial impact.
@@brandonleesanders Also very true. Moral of the story is: don't get into car accidents
@@megabeam - Agreed!
But were assuming a tesla can get into this bad of a crash at the speeds it did with how complex tesla systems are.
Honestly the way the Volvo glanced off rathe than coming to a complete stop would be way more survivable.
I feel like in certain situations it'd be more dangerous to keep rolling. Like on an interstate or highway, or maybe on a bridge. But in every other situation I agree.
@@jasondrown9087 Which one?
140km/h to a wall and die 99%
140km/h bounce off and get dropped in to a lake where depending how calm you are and know how go get out of a submerged vehicle decides your faith.
I mean of course if you want to die you would take that 140 to 0 in milliseconds as you don't get to feel much, drowning is a horrible way to go.
@@jasondrown9087 it hardly rolled past, Besides hitting something like that is very unlucky… I mean when was the last time you saw someone hit an unmovable wall with the corner of there car head on… Only thing I can think of is a building or maybe a pillar
@@redgator7250 It just depends on where/how it happened. I'm just stating that as a possibility. A lot of different scenarios can happen. And I'm not saying "oh this is dangerous why would they do that," I'm just stating that sometimes still rolling, regardless of how far, could be potentially dangerous to other people as well. For instance a head on collision, your car doesn't stop and rams into a group of pedestrians on the sidewalk.
Into on coming traffic
Volvo has always prided itself on safety.
The came up with the three point seatbelt. After seeing how important it was. Gave it away so every manufacturer could implement it. It's how they came up with their logo.
What a chad move
Pretty sure the logo is because of it being the sign for Iron. The have them self stated this.
@@johannilsson6395 That's correct, don't know where Mr. Stimpson got his info from as it's common knowledge.
@@Hrodn - I think he might be referring to the design behind the logo, specifically the diagonal line that cuts across the grille.
Without an even single penny royalty
Volvo designed it that in these situations you will lose momentum bit not all so the impact is less
The car could flip over
@@primeix8935 it couldnt. They know what they are doing
@@dinkoblazek9637 if that was even remotely accurate volvos would have a significantly higher crash test rating, fact of the matter is, in every single state and city in the nation you’re more likely to see a new fiat than a new volvo 😂 volvos are outrageously overpriced pieces of trash
@@coreymarshall229 you're forgetting that you get the maximum safety, Android based infotainment systems, triple and quadruple zone climate controls and it genuinely has a better interior than a Tesla or a fiat. Think about that
No that happened by chance
"going fast never killed anyone, coming to a sudden stop, thats what gets you"
Doors and corners kid, go in too fast and the room eats you
@@Cydonius1 Then the stop in the door/corners is what got you
@@Cydonius1 Still nobody has gotten killed for taking a corner too fast but surely yes for tuning out of the corner.
Apparently only you and I know the man that first brought these wise and sensible words the world
@@the3djs339 Josephus Miller, Detective, born on Ceres, deceased on Eros, current status : unknown
The volvo did better as it managed to deflect the impact and not stop. That is less energy transmitted to the occupants. The windshield on the volvo didn't break.
The windshield did break, though. You can see it cracked at the bottom corner on the side of the impact.
Doesn’t that also have to do with the width of the Model S? It’s a very wide car, probably wider than the Volvo
Tesla actually has better safety ratings access the board for all their cars than any other cars so..
@@Bubby74 Except for burning batteries
@@Bubby74 According to Tesla. According to the crash testers these are both 5 star cars. Tesla has gotten in trouble for saying otherwise. Just like they're in trouble again for their claims about self-driving
Telsa will never beat Volvo at safety, Volvo cars is the safest in the world
Tesla on average has a consistently higher crash test rating than volvo lmfao. Tesla’s are far safer cars. Tesla focuses on the complete aspect of the vehicle. Hence the cost of repair being on average cheaper over 10 years than even a toyota camry. The fact at 40-50g you get a faster more cost effective car than any other manufacturers..etc… no fan boy shit either, this is all indisputable and easily provable lmao
@@coreymarshall229 Volvo has won a lot of rewards over the years, Tesla on a few
Tesla: parts scattered
Volvo:
*I'm going home this is boring*
To those commenting the volvo roof bent. It dose that because it absorbs the impact which makes you and the passengers feel less of the impact.
That’s right.. the life of the passenger is more important than a roof that gets damaged by absorbing the shock to help save the passengers
The Tesla, frunk and crumple zone absorbed the impact and it might look bad, but you’re actually safe inside😅
Prefer the Volvos performance. This war you dont get squezed that hard against the steering wheel.
Ah yes... So you'd rather have the engine inside your lungs in a Frontal crash?
Yeah, I do not see your point. Volovs roof just bent on impact. And like another comment said, I would rather have a closer moment with my steering wheel rather have an engine in my lungs. Can you explain how did you get the conclusion that the dummy got squeezed?
Edit: just got a closer look and the steering wheel did NOT MOVE AT ALL.
@@meriofrog 1st how could u even see in it there was just airbags 2nd i dont think the pillars on the tesla are supposed to be a crumple zone and i didnt see any engine enter annyones lungs today
Yeah because one car doesn’t even have a steering wheel.
@@BLAKKKPOWERR my comments are getting deleted...
The s90 and Tesla r probably the top two cars that have gotten a 5 star rating.
But not the only.
Tata altroz
@@shameelabid6677 nobody gives shit about gncap , for European market they have their own rating where tata altoz will score rarely 1 or 2.
@@gurung056 and who said anyone cared about the European version. It doesn't mean shit.
Volvo's always been known to have some of the safest cars out there, and this further proves that.
No -_- ruclips.net/video/il2jmMRgFV8/видео.html
@@__Mantis__ I never said Teslas weren't safe dude, I said Volvo is known for having some of the safest cars, I don't know why you sent me that link, since I never insinuated that Teslas are worse 🤷♂️
VOLVO sets the bar for safety. It's why everyone tries to compare. Better luck next time Tesla.
What you mean better luck next time? They’re trying to be safe lol
@@KaneCiticani Trying to compete with Volvo, but haven't met that standard yet. Seems pretty self explanatory.
@@allaboutroofing2 teslas are the safest cars out there man lol
@@alexguy96 lol O-K...did you watch the same video?
Appears I've triggered some Tesla fanboys. 🤣
Shows that the Volvo is the safer car.. What kills you in an accident ist the deceleration.
The Teslas cabin crashes into the obsticle and hooks the car to a complete stop, while the Volvo bounces off. The impact in the Tesla is worse.
Cars have crumble zones which get comoletly destroyed in an accident.
The volvos off falling wheel isn't something bad.
So why does Euroncap and NHTSA give a better score and the lowest probability of injury to the Tesla? Unlike you data doesn't lie. But let me guess you know better than the engineers working at these crash labs right?
@@meisterkenobicrypto
Der Test von dem du redest bezieht sich auf Tesla Model X (spitzenmodell SUV) und Volvo s60 (kleiner Mittelklasse SUV).
Und selbst da hat der Volvo besser abgeschnitten, denn:
Im Tesla Betrug die Beschleunigung des Dummys am Kopf 63G.
Ab 50G stirbt ein Mensch mit hoher wahrscheinlichkeit. (Aber das weist du als angehender Spitzen Ingeneur der Automobilbranche natürlich)
Im Volvo betrug die Beschleunigung am Kopf nur 9G.
7 x 9G = 63G
Der Aufprall im Tesla war also 7 mal so schwer für die Insassen! Punkt.
Elon musk hat das Ergebnis einfach nur zu seinen gunsten ausgelegt.
Er sagt den Laien Kunden einfach: "guck, der Tesla sieht heiler aus."
Und das ist genau dass was der von dir angesprochene "score" besagt.
Der tesla hat nach dem unfall über 90% seiner ursprunglichen Form, der Volvo "nur noch" 74% seiner ursprünglichen form...
Aber wie bereits im ersten kommentar erwähnt, geht es nicht darum wie sehr das Auto von außen beschadigt wird, sondern darum wie viel davon auf die Insassen übertragen wird.
Von diesem Standpunkt aus betrachtet, ist der Tesla noch schlechter als aktuelle Ford und Fiat modelle.
Es geht nicht darum wie gut das Auto den unfall übersteht, sondern es geht um die Insassen. Diese sind im Volvo nach wie vor am besten geschützt, dicht gefolgt von Toyota, Mercedes, BMW und VW.
@@moparcoronet5870 you wrote all that for yourself 🤣
@@Relansls nope, his name showed me he's German..
@@meisterkenobicrypto why you trying to say teslas safer than volvos? They are the safest cara in the world, simple as that
I’ll take the Volvo any day! I’ve been in car accidents with alot of Volvo’s and they all did their jobb perfectly when it comes to keeping me alive!
Sweden produces alot of amazing products that american companies can only dream of making themselves.
If you want a safe car then there can only be one car brand and that is VOLVO!!!!!!
I have a volvo V40 R design and im happy being in that car on the daily knowing i am safe
German Cars are the best, but expensive..
@@sdsfghr i mean depends i would say sweedish cars are the best (in my opinion) cause Volvo are the safest cars in the world and Koininsegg have broke so many records over the time they have been producing cars but German cars are great aswell lots to choose from in the German roster
Since you've been in many accidents, don't you think it's best if you stop driving and take a bus instead?
How many accidents have you had man?! 🤣
Both tested 5 stars across the board by NHTSA. Volvo has more recalls but Tesla has more complaints.
Tesla has more solar panel complaints but complaints about cars are typically few. Tesla has corrected much more than people think, own 2. 😘 - i’ve had volvos before as well…main difference, i’d never buy a volvo again for myself or anyone - overpriced walmart car 😂😂😂
@@coreymarshall229 You're a lvl 99 clown if you own 2 teslas.
They should add few stars to that rating system. Volvo goes above other manufacturers with their safety stuff. Maybe not the prettiest or fastest cars but let me tell you if i should crash i wish it was in a volvo.
@@eggsycro well to be fair volvos have gone down the shitter when it comes to reliability and service cost. It's just fact. I've worked at a few dealerships for an fyi
@@Chum3c majority of cars will have you walking away from a crash. It's kind of a standard for safety
Both did great. Both are some of the safest vehicles you can buy. Both are great cars as well. No need to hate on either.
The Tesla performed wurse. The test clearly show the abrupt stop of the Tesla while the Volvo deflected the power and did not stop. It did so by loosing the tire.
@@sorennilsson9742 like fr the window crack shows all the force I've seen better from cadillacs, chevys and even some subarus
@@Easzzyp Ther are no cracks in the Volvos windows. What is seen is airbags.The side windows are thrown out as designed.
@@sorennilsson9742 I'm clearly talking about the tesla
@@Easzzyp Ok
Volvo is branded worlds safest mass produced car for a reason. If I remember correctly they've "sworn" to never have anyone die in an officially branded volvo car or something like that.
I remember reading by 2025 that volvo says no one will die in an accident in a volvo!
I hope it goes well for them! Love how safe their cars are! But I could never afford one!
Its their goal to make a car so safe that nobody will die when you drive one
Volvo is the safety king 👌🏼
Allot of forces in the tesla, the ovlov does a great job deflecting impact forces. Its great that volvo has made such a great example that other cars are now catching up.
Both do an excellent work.
Volvos are solid, they’ve consistently done well in NCAP tests for years! We call them Tanks as if you crash into a Volvo you’re gonna come off worse 🤣
Both are amazing cars
Volvo does it Good. The tesla driver absorb the Energy by Him self
What? Tesla's are made to absorb impact and to crumple, and that's what happend in this crash test. Are you on drugs or something?
@@meriofrog what he means is that the crumple zone got caught on the obstacle causing a sudden stop and thus more Gs for the passengers of the car. The volvos crumple zone allowed the car the slide off of the obstacle without causing a sudden stop.. Its obvious that the volvo did better when considering the safety of the passengers.
@@W--ko9ms
The Most important thing read the rest of the comment after this: What if you get into a car accident and the Volvo slides off and goes directly into a tree? Read the rest..
Well, first, that's how it was made to perform, second, how do you kow how many g's the poeple experienced. The Volvo and many other cars are made to slide off or minimize the impact as much as they can because it has very little space to crumple because of the engine, and i suppose that you do not want an engine in your lungs. The Tesla has a much larger crumple zone, thus, absorbing more impact, that's why it pushes you back. What if you are in a crash and the car slides and doest not stop, thus, sliding directly into a tree? That's 2 impacts isn't it? Or worse, what if it collides with another car or another HUMAN, killing that person at hight speed.
Edit: And the fact that the Tesla model s has a 6.3% injury rate proves and confirms the fact that the crumple zone DOES absorb a lot of impact.
@@meriofrog 2 seperate impacts would still put less stress on the human body than one big one. You are correct on the sliding and hitting other humans or objects. That is however, in my opinion, a matter of ethics rather than safety. Should a car stop on impact to keep others safer or subdivide the impact into multiple smaller impacts to keep the inhabitants safer..
It is well known in motorsports that the longer a a crash takes the higher the chance of survival is because the forces the driver experiences are spread out over time.
Edit: I can't type properly.
Tesla the best, stfu, obviously I'm a retarded kid
This is a difference between a brand that praises safety with years of experience against a brand that is a fashion trend.
You're acting like Tesla's aren't some of the safest cars on the road today.
@@comareborn8734 Acording to this crash test... isn't.
I got my driving licence 12 years ago never owned anything else than volvo 🥰❤ volvo for life ❤
And is that a Saab logo for your pfp lmao
@@YungEagle3k That's a Scania logo not Saab, I know they look pretty much a like but the badge where the animal emblem is on is a dead give away it's a Scania
Both were good... Truth is the gone off wheel of Volvo helped it skid to right, while the intact wheel of Tesla made it to come to a stop..
So don't argue
"intact wheel of Tesla" lol
Modern Volvos reliability is eh but when it comes to safety, they are one of the top safest car brands.
I had a Volvo 5cylinder turbo with 500 000km on it which for a turbo car is pretty unheard of and it was pretty quick for the tank that it was plus the interior was immaculate and everything worked
Our volvo (s40 1.6) has more than 350000 km and we are still using it with no issue. The engine had no proble at all
@Gaming Nepal another one of those tata fanboys
@@mynameislev my Volvo (850) has 400000km, 30 yo and it's the goodest car ever
@Gaming Nepal he maybe did, but the people are killed in his cars every day
Volvo safety always nr1
Good to see volvo still winning , but that was a good effort from the tesla
now that's safety and excellent engineering
The Tesla may have absorbed the blow and lessened passenger injury but I will always be amazed at how volvo is able to make their cars as safe as they are, we have an xc60, super comfortable and pleasant to drive but it’s built like a rock, that is shows by how that s90 collides with the barrier and just pushes away from the point of collision whereas the Tesla slams into it.
Way less o an impact to the body in the volvo ... it gets resirected insted of stoped like a tesla . Loses momentum but keeps going, so less g forces
Based on this video, Volve car is able to absorb the impact better and dont stop immediately hence less impact on passengers & driver
Nothing compares to a Volvo. I'm alive today because of my 1986 740 gle. I was rear ended at 75mph and lost control of the car. The right rear wheel slammed into raised median which should have flipped my car off the freeway. The panhard bar absorbed the most of the impact keeping me on the road and out of a 70 ft fall.
Tesla is just as safe, if not safer
@@Nathanhelmer2 other than the fact it can burn you alive in a fire that cannot be put out easily and is much harder to put out than a gasoline fire.
@@Nathanhelmer2 This video literally proves you wrong, Volvo is way safer than tesla in this situation and probably in many other crash situations.
The impact in the Volvo ist not as high as in the Tesla. So the chance of surviving this "small overlap" crash ist much higher in the Volvo than in the Tesla.
You don't see the way that the body is designed to push it away from the wall instead of slamming into the corner? Pretty much all Volvos since the early 2000s were designed that way
@Alfs Reviews so true haha
I feel so safe in my volvo they are all build and shaped a certin way to help aerodynamics and safety never underestimate volvos
*Reminder that Volvo invented the Modern SeatBelt used in almost every car on the road today*
That showed me nothing. Whats to compare, the way the Volvo rebounded like it should? Every car is designed to crunch and rebound in their own way. I want to see the data between the two.
डाटा चाहिए तेरे को ?
Yeah me too but i think we all new volvo won in the end
@Prime Artemis Still safer cry about it
@@Relansls it isnt. Volvo wont crash you into a tree on its own
@VenomousCranium nice joke bro🤣
That crash test was horrific look at how both cars just shattered on impact.
It’s well known to people living in Denmark and Sweden that volvo is a strong car.
I’ve been told that the car was reinforced so the driver wouldn’t get injured if they hit a deer (Sweden have some large woods).
The also said it in a danish move where they’re going to drive the car into a brick wall to rob the place. The driver don’t want to do it, and is scared that the car won’t hold, his mates just replies “But it’s a Volvo?”
I was in a real accident like this and I was able to drive home I'll keep my old trucks ty.
Volvo still amazing safety car
Yes sir
Both very safe
My mom had 3 accidensts in ger volvo xc60 in last 6 months. Fortunately they were quite mild. She was rear ended 2 times by idiot drivers and once a lady bumbed into ger car at a parking spot. Those 2 times she was rear ended she had only minor dents in her bumper but tge 2 other cars were quite fucked up. Yeah I'd take the volvo any day.
Maybe 🤔 should stop driving
See, in a sense the volvo crash is actually safer because rather than an abrupt stop it used the body of the car to slowly slide, this could reduce the chances of a critical injury in a crash like that.
My friends Volvo is amazing. Last time we were going to get into a car accident and the Volvo braked, locked the seat belt and tightened the seat belt and push me back. I have a model 3 and it doesn’t do that. I was like wow. Felt so safe in it. I love my Tesla but the Volvo was something else. I got goosebumps
You should sold the tesla and get a Volvo. Life is more important than having cool tech
@@rktmtkljelrdkbn1852 well teslas are safe dude 😂 I am so sorry you are so ignorant
@@Iegend17 i have a Volvo V40 R design and i love it it feels so safe passenger seats and all, but if u like ur tesla keep it bro this other guy prob has an old fiat panda not a new Volvo🤣 teslas are safe aswell, honostly very close behind Volvo, Stay happy bro
@@milissadeering1027 who told you? This video!
And btw How do you know what I have? I can assure you my car is lot better than you.
@@Iegend17 chill I was trolling
I myself have P100D
”Speed doesn’t kill. Suddenly becoming stationary, that’s what gets you.” /J. Clarkson
Speed? Facts? Info? Weights?
Yeah i wanna know
No one can beat Volvo in safety of a vehicle
I gueeeees volvo finally wins!
One is go to a complete stop and the other one is keep going forward
Have a 97 volvo 850 and i feel zero fear driving in the city (St louis residents cant drive. constantly run lights and stop signs)
Yeah and thats an old volvo, Volvo have been making great safe cars for years i love my V40 R design but damn that 850 is so great its reliable, safe, fast and nice to be in
@@milissadeering1027 i love it, its my first volvo! Have a few things to fix up on her but she runs smooth and picks up great!
Damn the way the Volvo moved away to help save the lower legs is pretty cool
Someone explain the difference, only thing I noticed was the Volvo roof bent , model s didn’t
Tesla stopped right there while Volvo went thru which causing further trouble.
@@youngyou8634 wrong… it dispenses the impact much better than Tesla, which means less impact on passengers.
@@andriusjuskevicius4197 exactly
In all fairness @AndriusJuskevicius we don’t know the internal dispensing in either vehicle , stopping on impact is a much better feature if it was designed to do so, the people in the crashed vehicle will be impacted either way no need for them to mow down a crowd of people near by. Volvo has always had amazing safety standards it’s interesting to see the safety comparison to newcomer Tesla who touts a big game on safety. Either way I’ll wait for the VTOLs 😅
We should never forget who the first seat belt was invented by a Volvo engineer
See, the trick is to not crash. That’s why I drive a dangerously fast car that I know I’ll die in if I crash like this because it puts your LIFE on the line.
I’d say the Volvo had a better crash. The Tesla wheel just shattered. What’s that shit made of?? Weak!!!!
Yeah... How about the roof on you Volvo bending on impact, how about that? And I think you are a little bit more stupid here, the weel shattering does not have an impact on the safety of the driver. A more realistic example is the side crash test where the fucking pillar got in to the car and replaced the driver.
@@meriofrog you want the wheel to brake away and the car to slide away from the center of collision as statistically having a car remain at center of collision is primary cause of secondary collisions.
Volvo has a better system for protecting the passengers in the cabin that Tesla’s honestly trash way of using the battery pack as part of the structure can’t compete with. It’s called SIPS, Side Impact Protection System. And not all for side impacts but is optimized for it. Allows the cabin to basically “float” separately during a crash. Say inpact is brutal the system will recognize how brutal it was and way angle it’s from and how fast impact occurred and direction computer instantly calculated how much of the airbags to deploy (can deploy airbags slower, faster or even pop them twice). The seats and center console will actually move as needed as well. SIPS will also engage ROPS and WHIPS system all at the same time. ROPS is roll over Protection system, basically uses antilock brakes, sensors around it like speed sensors, yaw rate sensors and so on and measures the acceleration on the suspension to change how they will compensate with the 4C chassis. If you have a convertible volvo like C70, it also deploy the roll bars above your head and roof line. The WHIPS system is anti whiplash system, basically takes impact measurements, calculated velocity, delta in velocity, angle, direction, and can deploy airbags in seats individually as much as it needs, slams the pretensioner on belt very tightly to force you locked into your seat, minimal movements. WHIPS can if decides appropriate based on situation fire explosive bolts in seats to collapse it to a specific degree as well.
@@meriofrog the roof bends slightly in to help with impact if u have ever sat in a volvo u would know they are very sturdy ur just jealous that ur mams minivan will split in 2
@@milissadeering1027 Are we talking about my 'mams' minivan or a car that completely shits on your Volvo? "Ur just jealous", that's the most 12 year old line I've ever heard, you can not come up with a better argument so you just say that and baam, cool kid, won the argument... No.
So this an Ad for Volve made by Tesla... Brilliant!
I think this crash test is one of the few where a Volvo beats the Tesla. It didn’t stop completely and hense did not face as syrong impact. Reason being that the battery is so stiff and hard on a Tesla that it stops the whole car. It’s an advantagein other tests though as it will not roll over as easily as a Volvo on side impact. Both are good cars in terms of safety.
Yep that just aimed you into on coming traffic in the UK🤷🏼♂️
Depends how deep the seat belt is going to dig in to your ribs🤪 big fan of tesla but prefer to be in Volvo in this case 😉
What? Volvo's roof just BENT on impact...
@@meriofrog yeah its a safety feature all volvos come with that as standered look at all our EU cars and then look at a Ford mustang yeah im gonna go with Volvo, Volswagan and audi on this one
@@milissadeering1027 Ya know what they say, "Its not a bug, it's a feature", in this case, "It's not that our car is trash and bends on impact, ITS A SAFETY FEATURE" LMAO IM DYING.
Edit: You do know how stupid you sound when you say that the car's FUCKING ROOF BENDING ON IMPACT it's a SAFETY feature, right ?.
@@meriofrog That's called impact absorption. There are 'crumple zones' that are designed to absorb impact while protecting the occupants and cabin. Volvo sets the standard as far as safety and everyone else tries to follow. Suppose you got into this accident, would you care if the roof crumpled and kept you safe? Both vehicles are totaled anyway, so it's protection of the occupants that matters and you can clearly see the Volvo defects off and takes far less overall inertia. The damage is calculated since those crumple zones will only crumple so much.
@@allaboutroofing2 From when to when did the fucking roof became a crumple zone? Imagine being in a rollover with that shit.. god...
Absolutely smashing
Can’t beat Volvo in safety.
Nope
What da hell is wrong with those comments??!🙆🤬
First: Have u ever seen a perfectly straight crush onto something that has a rectangular shape? Me neither. Most of objects have rounded corners which allows for vehicles to slide when impact is one-sided.
Second: Tesla has their stiff battery pack that lowers the center of mass and makes vehicle zone hard to penetrate by stationary objects. Gass car can NEVER reach this due to their construction.
Third: regardless of moderate speed non of the vehicles passenger zones were damaged. Which means that we have all of the people alive inside both cars with high probability. Which, again, means that "GOOD JOB FOR BOTH OF THE VEHICLES", not only for Volvo, wtf guys🤷🤷🤷
I love Volvo ♥️
Ok im no expert but both seemed to do pretty well overall. The crumple zones crumpled and absorbed energy but no crushing of the passenger cell. Volvo might have the edge, love to get to see photos of interior after.
Volvo will always be the best and she don't has battery going in fire
don't forget ICE car already have fire in their engine and hope it won't spread 😂
Yeah ICE cars run on cold gas thruster
@@ashokkumar61118 the engine shuts off on impact
@@ashokkumar61118 bruh💀😂
Anybody heard of "Volvo saved my life" club? Never heard of a "Chevy saved my life" or any other car manufacturer.
Still Volvo is the best safety here compared to Cheap unreliable Tesla!
a new car built by a company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should they initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, they don't do one
That Volvo box frame
Safety wise for people worried about it e Volvo did better in my opinion cause it deflected and took impact, while protecting the driver
The facts show this as well when you look at the dummy impact numbers…and when you watch what happens to the dummy in each of the crashes
I have always had this in my brain that volvo are the safest cars in the world since I was a kid.
Passenger unconscious: 💀😞
Mall Cop: Sir you can't park here I'm going to have to ask you to move your car.
roll over? head on? side swipe? not just one corner man
I have a 1997 Volvo 850 and feel pretty safe but both of these crashing at I presume 35/45 mph both look pretty bad.
The more the car falls apart the better, but if the cabin crumples, it gets worse.
S90 is good no pressure on driver bud Tesla is has an good impact
🤣🤣 the volvo literally went through onto its next collision
That's why we love Volvo... safe as houses
Unfortunately the crash wall was written off by the insurance 😂
The answer is: don't crash :D
Volvo basically revolutionized car safety. I expect nothing less from them
Nokia: introducing the first ever Nokia Car *shows a tank*
If only Volvo made their cars as reliable as their safety crash ratings... Great safety... Shit reliability.
When are they gonna put that eject seat ?
Ppl in comments trying to say that full stopping is better than letting the car go further... Please go to school... Its not that hard to learn pshysics... VOLVO XC90 has 0 deaths on records
Volvo got a History!
Not convinced. The Tesla tire rim was pinched so they weren’t hit at the same angle. Makes a dramatic difference
A small over lap crash involves hitting 25% of the front side of the car. The angles are the same. The difference is in how the frames of the 2 vehicles are designed and one was clearly designed better for this crash. I hope you’re sharp enough to be able to tell which one that is.
Volvo is like oh it's a pleasure to know you walk bye
Nah, in the real world, the Tesla would have just avoided the accident altogether
I’m unsure which I’d rather
Volvo
Volvo for the win via not bearing all force and then pivoting , deflection wins. Fluke or angular corner design in cabin envelope frame of Volvo??? Thoughts??
Yeah, can’t afford either .🤷🏻♂️
Thats why when I needed a car I pick Volvo.
Ppl forgetting this is 2017 and 2021 Tesla’s are the safest car on the market is funny
Volvo design cars with safety inmind
The volvo here is designed to deflect some of the impact and making the impact rate as smooth as possible
Seatbelts were first used in volvo cars and then made mandatory ide take any volvo over tesla tesla may be OK but volvos better
Tesla 👍
Volvo 👍
The tesla didn't have deflective crumple zone at the time
American made cars were never known for their safety. Volvo was and still is.
Car VS Golfcart
Volvo is like: I don't give a f*ck lil wall, Imma go away