Order Here (affiliate): geni.us/SigPlHol or amzn.to/3Xxk29h (when avail) Sigma 24-70 f2.8 ART II (affiliate): geni.us/sig2470ArtII or geni.us/SigPlHol Sigma 28-45 F1.8 ART (affiliate): geni.us/Si2845 or geni.us/Sigma2845Ado Gear Used For Video (affiliates): Camera: geni.us/SnyFav or geni.us/ZVE1Ador Lens: Sony 16-25 (affiliate): geni.us/Sny1625 or geni.us/Sony1625Ado Mics: geni.us/HlyLarkM2 or howl.me/cmGGNaqLAsA
@@DespotRus not entirely true. the light coming in is still f2.8. crop factor won't affect that. but the amount of blur It's actually a bit shallower (more blur) than f/4 would be on full frame.
At last someone saw the problem of the "standard" 24-70/2.8 zooms...namely too wide and not much tele. Thank you Sigma for producing a true art quality "standard" f/2.8 zoom!
I mean it's always a balance of size weight and use cases. So making a 28-105 is probably way more complicated and heavier. And in many lines of work you rarely go much more than 85. But it is an amazing option but I wouldn't only want this because 24-70 can be half the weight
Proves the point that telephoto is not full-frame's game. Wide to normal to mild tele, it's great. Anything beyond 200mm is just unweildy and massive and incredibly overpriced. APSC and M43 own in those spaces. It's too bad there's so much sensor elitism out there. Let's see if Tamron can do the 28-180 f2.8 some people have been suggesting. That's almost as far as the Olympus 12-100 f4
This range just might be the sweet spot. I always want more reach when traveling, but still want the wide end. I tried the Sony 24-240 and didn’t like the quality. This is a contendor.
Wowza! That's a serious tube full of glass man👀. I wonder if the other half would mind carrying that for me😂. I like how you even managed to snag a shot from the Red Arrows' visit to Toronto!
I do like sigma lens for its clarity. But i hate it for non-stable footage. Even a normal non-gimbal shot has lots of jerks. Thats' when i decided: if you own sony and if you are a videographer, then no, total NO for sigma , unless you wan to carry another 1KG of gimbal around in your bag
Looks awesome. I currently use the Lumix 24-105mm f4 Lens for a cooking channel and find myself shooting at f8 to keep everything in focus. It's kind of dumb even considering this new lens for the cooking channel right? Specially since I'm not using the low f stops.
Mark (or anyone out there), Quick question, do E mount lenses fit both full frame and APSC without an adapter? I’ve tried to research this but can’t find a clear answer. For example, can Sigma 18-50 fit on an A6700 and then A7C without a problem and without an adapter?
yes - the full frame cameras and aps-c cameras share the same mount so you can use any e mount lens on any e mount camera. the only thing to be aware of is that if you use an aps-c lens on a full frame camera like the a7c, the full frame camera will go into aps-c crop mode. this is fine for video, but you will lose a lot of megapixels for photos
The camera gears are getting heat. The only lens we had in the market closer to this was Canon RF 24-105 2.8 (too big and expensive) for 3000 dol. THANK YOU SIGMA!
Cute kitty pic! This lens is sweet! I am definitely going to be considering it… AND IF I BUY IT, I will be clicking this gorgeous man’s affiliate link!
There is no comparison with 35-150 in 2+ lens (camera) setup (events, more portraits options, etc). Nothing to really compare there, doesn't matter if one is a bit sharper here or not there - 28/2.8 is not a substitution for 35/2 going to 150/2.8 in a second, not needing 70-200 etc., in most scenarios people use and love the 35-150. This new one is very good, but comparatively mostly better only when you really want to stay at 1kg and attempt one lens midrange with slight extension, or prefer it for video.
I dont think I will pick this over the tamron 35-150. I just like the better focal range on the tamron. I love my sigma lenses but the 35-150 still runs the zoom world right now
If you don’t think Sony can’t make that you’re crazy and obviously Sony is getting a cut of everyone sold otherwise they wouldn’t allow others to make z mount
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis well you can’t really complain about Sony e mount it’s the best by far not even close to be able to get sigma 24-70 for half the price of the g master also they have a 28-45 1.8 for $1400 Sony definitely will be dropping those lenses the next year or 2 but expect it to be $2700-3000 I’m sure
Ok. Which range is more useful for all around lens? 20-70 F4 - 3.5x zoom, or 28-105 F2.8 3.75x zoom. FF camera is not scared of F4 for noise, so that is out of the question. Which one is preferable? Wider or longer? I pick 20-70 zoom range. Sony 20-70 would be better for weight, Active stabilization better integrated with a camera, wider for tight shots without switching to prime.
Would love to see an update. It is smaller and lighter and the OSS will matter at the tele end especially doing video to remove some shakes, but I would choose the Sigma out of the two myself
Not to be disrespectful, but don't you think that your sharpness chart is kinda printed in lower resolution than modern lenses and sensors can resolve? Appreciate the effort though!
Order Here (affiliate): geni.us/SigPlHol or amzn.to/3Xxk29h (when avail)
Sigma 24-70 f2.8 ART II (affiliate): geni.us/sig2470ArtII or geni.us/SigPlHol
Sigma 28-45 F1.8 ART (affiliate): geni.us/Si2845 or geni.us/Sigma2845Ado
Gear Used For Video (affiliates):
Camera: geni.us/SnyFav or geni.us/ZVE1Ador
Lens: Sony 16-25 (affiliate): geni.us/Sny1625 or geni.us/Sony1625Ado
Mics: geni.us/HlyLarkM2 or howl.me/cmGGNaqLAsA
Finally, the full frame bois can experience what we APS-C lads have had since the Tamron 17-70 f/2.8
It's 25-105 f/4 ff equivalent, what do you mean?
@@DespotRus I meant to write a funny comment but you are technically correct. The best kind of correct.
@@DespotRus closer to 26-105 f/4.2 but yes, we've had similar type f/4 zooms on FF that are a similar size/weight and technically faster :)
Lol comment of the week 😂
@@DespotRus not entirely true. the light coming in is still f2.8. crop factor won't affect that. but the amount of blur It's actually a bit shallower (more blur) than f/4 would be on full frame.
This is VERY temping.
We. Are. So. Spoiled. So excited to try this lens. Great review brother. I’ll never be as cool as you 😭
haha. I hope you end all of your comments this way forever 🤣🤣🤣
At last someone saw the problem of the "standard" 24-70/2.8 zooms...namely too wide and not much tele. Thank you Sigma for producing a true art quality "standard" f/2.8 zoom!
I mean it's always a balance of size weight and use cases. So making a 28-105 is probably way more complicated and heavier. And in many lines of work you rarely go much more than 85. But it is an amazing option but I wouldn't only want this because 24-70 can be half the weight
It’s about time we’ll have a different type of trinity. 12-28, 28-105, and 100-300
Nice video Mark . What can you say about the SIRUI 33MM F1.2 lens . Is that any good ?
Wth if only internal zoom
Proves the point that telephoto is not full-frame's game. Wide to normal to mild tele, it's great. Anything beyond 200mm is just unweildy and massive and incredibly overpriced. APSC and M43 own in those spaces. It's too bad there's so much sensor elitism out there.
Let's see if Tamron can do the 28-180 f2.8 some people have been suggesting. That's almost as far as the Olympus 12-100 f4
This range just might be the sweet spot. I always want more reach when traveling, but still want the wide end. I tried the Sony 24-240 and didn’t like the quality. This is a contendor.
Look at the Tamron 35-150 f2-2.8 if 35 is wider enough for you
Is it parfocal? Or close to parfocal? I am not sure if you covered that, I almost sleeping 😂 thanks for the review.❤
Wowza! That's a serious tube full of glass man👀. I wonder if the other half would mind carrying that for me😂. I like how you even managed to snag a shot from the Red Arrows' visit to Toronto!
I do like sigma lens for its clarity. But i hate it for non-stable footage. Even a normal non-gimbal shot has lots of jerks. Thats' when i decided: if you own sony and if you are a videographer, then no, total NO for sigma , unless you wan to carry another 1KG of gimbal around in your bag
great review. love your videos and personality.
zve10 with samyang V-af 24mm T1.9 cine lens.
I still prefer my 24-105, F4 with the FX3 is more than enough.
same. i actually use the 24mm. f/4 is fine, even for portraits at 105mm.
Looks awesome. I currently use the Lumix 24-105mm f4 Lens for a cooking channel and find myself shooting at f8 to keep everything in focus. It's kind of dumb even considering this new lens for the cooking channel right? Specially since I'm not using the low f stops.
If you've already got the 24-105 and you don't need f2.8 - I would stick with what you have
Mark (or anyone out there), Quick question, do E mount lenses fit both full frame and APSC without an adapter? I’ve tried to research this but can’t find a clear answer. For example, can Sigma 18-50 fit on an A6700 and then A7C without a problem and without an adapter?
yes - the full frame cameras and aps-c cameras share the same mount so you can use any e mount lens on any e mount camera. the only thing to be aware of is that if you use an aps-c lens on a full frame camera like the a7c, the full frame camera will go into aps-c crop mode. this is fine for video, but you will lose a lot of megapixels for photos
Im on a big dilemma 😫 this one or the 24-70 mark ii from sigma is the best for an allround event/run and gun lens i wonder
The camera gears are getting heat. The only lens we had in the market closer to this was Canon RF 24-105 2.8 (too big and expensive) for 3000 dol. THANK YOU SIGMA!
I still dont think I would pick it over the tamron 35-150.
@@BrandonColePhotography Its a awesome lens too
Cute kitty pic! This lens is sweet! I am definitely going to be considering it… AND IF I BUY IT, I will be clicking this gorgeous man’s affiliate link!
This is a dream lense. A bit big tough
I seen this lens on the rumor page and had my fingers crossed. Thank you Sigma. Now I need to see how this compares to the Tamron 35-150mm.
Nothing really beats 35-150
@MarkBennettCameraCrisis - I would love to see that comparison.
There is no comparison with 35-150 in 2+ lens (camera) setup (events, more portraits options, etc).
Nothing to really compare there, doesn't matter if one is a bit sharper here or not there - 28/2.8 is not a substitution for 35/2 going to 150/2.8 in a second, not needing 70-200 etc., in most scenarios people use and love the 35-150.
This new one is very good, but comparatively mostly better only when you really want to stay at 1kg and attempt one lens midrange with slight extension, or prefer it for video.
Great job on the video Mark! Thanks for making it.
Very compelling, if I don't have my 35-150mm then I'll definitely buy one.
Same here
How about a 24-85mm F1.8? 28mm isn't wide enough when you can go 35-150mm F2.8 (already in existence).
Would you recommend the Sony Zv-e 10 ii for shooting music videos?
absolutely
wish it had IS
🖤🖤
I just got sony a7cii ,so What is the best lens for this camera for everything?
Probably the 24-70 GM II amzn.to/4gHZiDl
Great preview, Mark! Any word on pricing?
Yes - $1499 YSD. I have it in the beginning when I mention the other Art Lenses
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis ah, I missed it, thanks, Mark!
Sigma finally has one lens with nice sunstars instead of a spoke wheel and that's the thing you don't like 🙈
to each his own!! 🤣
I dont think I will pick this over the tamron 35-150. I just like the better focal range on the tamron. I love my sigma lenses but the 35-150 still runs the zoom world right now
A great lens to be sure
If you don’t think Sony can’t make that you’re crazy and obviously Sony is getting a cut of everyone sold otherwise they wouldn’t allow others to make z mount
They can make it for sure. I wish they would. But they haven’t yet
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis well you can’t really complain about Sony e mount it’s the best by far not even close to be able to get sigma 24-70 for half the price of the g master also they have a 28-45 1.8 for $1400 Sony definitely will be dropping those lenses the next year or 2 but expect it to be $2700-3000 I’m sure
Very good video Mark you stepped up the level good job!!!
Can you review Lumix s9 ?
I want to yes.i will try
That’s a great video keep it up with the informative content😍😍
Ok. Which range is more useful for all around lens? 20-70 F4 - 3.5x zoom, or 28-105 F2.8 3.75x zoom. FF camera is not scared of F4 for noise, so that is out of the question. Which one is preferable? Wider or longer? I pick 20-70 zoom range. Sony 20-70 would be better for weight, Active stabilization better integrated with a camera, wider for tight shots without switching to prime.
Very usueful for sure. I love the bokeh of 2.8 at 105mm though - so it is tough!!
I need it.... I certainly need it
which one is more useful 28 105 or 35 150
I long for this lens in an RF mount 🥺
$1500??!? not bad...
Resist the Temptation King Resist the Temptation !
You don't need it
You don't need it
🤣🤣
FE 24-105 G OSS competitor. Sony need to update it. how will that 4mm and Optical Stabilisation actually matter?
Would love to see an update. It is smaller and lighter and the OSS will matter at the tele end especially doing video to remove some shakes, but I would choose the Sigma out of the two myself
I just bought the Sony 18-105mm f4. The Sigma looks great but is way out of my budget. Thanks for sharing.
The internal power zoom is the killer feature and the price is hard to beat.
Sun Stars.... Didn't realize the number of blades affects the size and weight of a lens so much. If they made it 11 blades, it would have been better.
I’m no lens engineer - but they said to keep the aperture compartment small to reduce overall weight, the landed on 12 blades.
Not to be disrespectful, but don't you think that your sharpness chart is kinda printed in lower resolution than modern lenses and sensors can resolve?
Appreciate the effort though!
you can still see the sharpness relative to the chart. if the chart looks sharper in the centre than the corners, it has the same effect.
I feel like this 28-105 and the 16-28 will be a great combo for my S5ii. 💸💸
There is not that many choices for L mount anyway.
When it comes to zooms, Tamron is usually ahead of the game and Sigma is just a mediocre follower.
I’m a big fan of both
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Tamron 35-150 is the more popular and useful one.
is this par focal?
@@fellawhofilms7760 close- but no.
I have a tamron 28-200 f2.8, its my love now
That is not a constant aperture lens. Good glass nevertheless.
@@AbhyudayaRanglani yeah, but do my job, I can shoot videos in small studio, take wide shots and also wildlife. For me its enough
Too big
not small for sure
sigma should've made it 24-105mm
would have been really big
This can be used on zve10?
Yes, but it won't be f2.8 on apsc
@@SRs2SM what would be f number?
@@sanwalmuzammalf4.2
It will be an f2.8 for light gathering that won’t change. DOF will be similar to an f4 but on the zve10 this lens will be 42-158mm equivalent.