Texan Reacts to Guide to Sweden's Armored Force

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 окт 2024

Комментарии • 112

  • @kristofferhellstrom
    @kristofferhellstrom Год назад +17

    The original video did a really great job in making this video. It's the most in depth video about the Swedish military I've seen.

    • @rayceofhistory
      @rayceofhistory  Год назад +2

      I thought it was well done too, although it’s hard for me to tell sometimes from an outsiders perspective.

  • @zpitzer
    @zpitzer Год назад +9

    All swedish weapons are made for fighting in our back yard, maybe some times others can use it. :)

  • @robertohlen4980
    @robertohlen4980 Год назад +8

    Germany has been supplying recovery tanks and bridge laying tanks based on the Leo 2.

  • @kristofferhellstrom
    @kristofferhellstrom Год назад +4

    4:51 Haha. Love the your comment about the Danes :D Danskjävlar!

    • @runthehills7858
      @runthehills7858 Год назад

      Haha! Always keep an watchful eye on the danes...and Snapphanarna in the south. ;)

    • @kristofferhellstrom
      @kristofferhellstrom Год назад

      @@runthehills7858 Ooooh yes! :)

  • @hightie1
    @hightie1 Год назад +5

    22.47 the man in officersuniform standing in the tank is the swedish king Carl XVI Gustaf.

  • @Bathtubcrocodile
    @Bathtubcrocodile Год назад +6

    That tiny Island is Gotland. Control Gotland and you basically control the entire region. It is the most important spot.

    • @rayceofhistory
      @rayceofhistory  Год назад +5

      Agreed, we’ve had this conversation on discord a handful of times. Gotland is what I think would be an initial strike point in a move outwards through the Baltic.

    • @Bathtubcrocodile
      @Bathtubcrocodile Год назад

      @@rayceofhistory indeed. But we will stack Russian corpses sky high there If they try. And sink every vessel.

  • @assarstromblad3280
    @assarstromblad3280 Год назад +13

    I was on the south scania 72nd as a conscript for a year. It is arguably very important for swedens defence as a air landing would most likely be done in that area (big open fields everywhere, perfect for that kind of attack)

    • @thegreatdane3627
      @thegreatdane3627 Год назад +1

      just admit it, it's because you know we will come to take Skåne back sooner or later 😉

    • @melkor3496
      @melkor3496 Год назад +4

      @@thegreatdane3627In your dreams.

    • @FadeStrategy
      @FadeStrategy Год назад

      @@thegreatdane3627 You can have it for free

    • @assarstromblad3280
      @assarstromblad3280 Год назад

      @@FadeStrategy Gladly, tell me when to show up and let's dig a trench at hallandsåsen.

    • @assarstromblad3280
      @assarstromblad3280 Год назад

      @@thegreatdane3627 nah, you would be kinda welcome, we are tired of the stupidity in stockholm anyways

  • @kristofferhellstrom
    @kristofferhellstrom Год назад +6

    An interesting fact about the Swedish Leopard 2 "Improved" A5 SE (stridsvagn 122). It's the only Leopard in the world with additional armor added to the turret.

    • @Ragedaonenlonely
      @Ragedaonenlonely Год назад

      I'm pretty sure that's not the case. Some variants of the 2A7 I believe also uses its armour package for protection in urban warfare. Also it's not a 2A5. It was developed concurrently with the 2A5 from the same vehicle, the Leopard 2 Improved, essentially an upgraded 2A4. The 2A5 didn't exist yet when the 122 was being made.

    • @scruffy7760
      @scruffy7760 Год назад +4

      We did add 3 tons of armor to our Leo2s when we modified them. The Germans thought it was such a good idea they copied it. So no... The Strv122 is not the only Leo2 with lots of armor on the turret

    • @Ragedaonenlonely
      @Ragedaonenlonely Год назад +1

      @@scruffy7760 Yes and no. For the regular version I believe they only added the armour to the hull. I think only some lesser used versions have the actual roof armour.

    • @Bathtubcrocodile
      @Bathtubcrocodile Год назад

      @@scruffy7760 Polish version seems to be beefed up on armor on the turret.

    • @KarILsson
      @KarILsson Год назад

      Only Leopard 2 with the French GALIX smoke grenade launchers.

  • @Thisandthat8908
    @Thisandthat8908 Год назад +3

    Good thing we have our evil enemy back now, isn't it...
    Makes everything much easier.

  • @goldrush5764
    @goldrush5764 Год назад +10

    I saw that you got pretty impressed by the BV410. You should check out Matsimus video on the BVS10 (one version of this vehicle), it's a great video. I recommended this video before and you said you would do it, but maybe you forgot or had a bunch of other videos to go through. But please do that one Rayce! You will be impressed of this vehicle, it's insane when it comes to mobility!
    We have also exported a lot of these tracked vehicels around the world. A lot of fire departments, police, military, mountain rescuers, etc. use them.

    • @Ragedaonenlonely
      @Ragedaonenlonely Год назад +5

      The British army also use them apparently. Probably a fair few other militaries too.

    • @kristofferhellstrom
      @kristofferhellstrom Год назад +6

      @@Ragedaonenlonely Yeah. It's called the Viking by the Britts. Good name :)

    • @rayceofhistory
      @rayceofhistory  Год назад +3

      I definitely will. I have a oh, 200(ish) video recommended list but I try to fit them in next to each other so I’m not jumping subjects every day so I’ll try to fit in here with this stuff.

    • @goldrush5764
      @goldrush5764 Год назад

      @@rayceofhistory Great! .. :D

    • @petter5721
      @petter5721 Год назад

      @@rayceofhistory
      Sweden currently operates five variants of the Bv410:
      APC, C3, Ambulans, Logistics and AA (RBS98 IrisT) variants.

  • @marcusornestahl6378
    @marcusornestahl6378 Год назад +5

    I prefer the KSP58 over the ksp90 mainly couse a KSP58 with the gas regulator turned down low is amongst the most manly things there is to shot. When i did my conscription i dreaded the GRG, couse not only did you have to hump around the bush with a solid metal tube wighing a literal ton strapped to your back, you had to hump your main rifle and ammo as well. So my preferance as an old Pioner is AK5 with At4 at my back.

    • @somefuckstolemynick
      @somefuckstolemynick 8 месяцев назад

      “Literal” literally means the opposite of how you use it here.

  • @kristofferhellstrom
    @kristofferhellstrom Год назад +4

    I like the idea of all the CV90s having the 40mm auto cannon. Means even the support and command vehicles could look and shoot down drones.

    • @Ragedaonenlonely
      @Ragedaonenlonely Год назад

      The downside is cannons and ammunition takes space. That means less space for crew and command equipment most likely. That's probably part of the reason they weren't armed with one earlier. The other reason is probably cost.

    • @kristofferhellstrom
      @kristofferhellstrom Год назад +3

      @@Ragedaonenlonely Yeah. But having eyes in the sky is more important today some that kinda makes up for the less space.

  • @Looxoor
    @Looxoor Год назад +2

    Yeah, the decision to reinforce the entirety of our armed forces was a direct response to 2014 Crimea and the overall deteriorated state of security in the region that followed.

  • @scruffy7760
    @scruffy7760 Год назад +1

    Mounted combat was a big part of the doctrine even during the Cold War. If you look at the KP car and PBV301 and PBV302, fighting from the vehicle was always part of the equation.
    There have since the 60s been two main ways to attack with Armored Infantry in Swedish doctrine. Dismounted, with vehicles providing support. This could include tanks being right next to the troops. Or, mounted, driving up to and even into the enemy position, with the option to keep fighting mounted to remain highly mobile, or, to dismount and push into point blank range.

  • @peretandersson3366
    @peretandersson3366 Год назад +4

    Gotland is like the worlds biggest aircraft carrier that you can't sink!!!!

    • @petter5721
      @petter5721 Год назад

      It can not move either 😂

    • @nomennescio4604
      @nomennescio4604 11 дней назад

      @@petter5721 As they say: Location, location, location. There is very little room to move about in the Baltic sea for an actual aircraft carrier anyway. Too constricted.

  • @Ragedaonenlonely
    @Ragedaonenlonely Год назад +1

    11:10 Pretty much. They're there as command units to organize other forces and aren't really supposed to be direct combat units. The machine gun is primarily for self-defence. Adding a cannon is an extra force multiplier though and means you can do more with less when the available manpower is limited.
    12:00 That and the terrain. Northern Sweden has a lot more rough terrain. It's heavily forested and infrastructure and roads are more sparse and so there's a greater need to go off-road where wheeled vehicles and trucks won't do as well. Rivers aren't exactly uncommon either and not all bridges will be able to support the weight of heavy vehicles.
    19:44 I can't actually speak from personal experience, but I'd imagine the 90 would be preferred for general carry because of the lighter weight and the greater ease with which you can quickly respond to a threat with it. The 58 would probably be preferred for longer and more static engagements where the greater effective range and larger volume of fire it allows for is more important. The MAG is a heavy, heavy gun, but it's also incredibly reliable and just keeps going and going. Not so fun to carry, but very effective once shit hits the fan.
    24:15 The fighting mounted is probably mostly for putting down defensive suppressive fire. As he mentions the accuracy of fire when done this way is questionable, however fire doesn't necessarily need to be accurate for suppression. It still accomplishes its goal of encouraging infantry to keep their head down instead of returning fire and in that way successfully helps protect the mounted vehicle. They would probably dismount later on to actually neutralize the threat more properly. EDIT: Probably doesn't hurt the situational awareness of the vehicle to have a couple more sets of eyes and ears keeping watch in the back of the vehicle either. Hard to see much when you're buttoned up inside an armoured compartment.

    • @scruffy7760
      @scruffy7760 Год назад

      Mounted combat was a big part of the doctrine even during the Cold War. If you look at the KP car (Kp-bil) and PBV301 and PBV302, fighting from the vehicle was always part of the equation. There have since the 60s been two main ways to attack with Armored Infantry in Swedish doctrine. Dismounted, with vehicles providing support. This could include tanks being right next to the troops. Or, mounted, driving up to and even into the enemy position, with the option to keep fighting mounted to remain highly mobile, or, to dismount and push into point blank range.
      The idea is you hit the enemy with mortars, possibly even HE from tanks, while the IFV or APC charges. The shell-shocked enemy realizes armored vehicles are crashing into them and angry riflemen are shooting at them. Some armored infantry might dismount to clear out trenches or secure a ridge etc, while those mounted can still maneuver and be protected from rifles and machineguns, quickly repositioning as needed to counter threats or exploit a situation.

  • @KarILsson
    @KarILsson Год назад +1

    Like mention earlier the hovercraft in the beginning is a Russian Zubr-class LCAC…..
    Gives me flashbacks was in the north at 191./192. Mechanized Bns. At Norrbotten Armoured Battalion P 5 in the 90´s when its was Norrbotten Regiment with Norrbotten Armoured Battalion I19/P5 and had the strv(Stridsvagn) 103C aka S-tank at 1:11 and Pbv(Pansarbandvagn) 302 (Armored track vehicle 302, infantry fighting vehicle) at 22:01.

  • @FreeRangeHuman1
    @FreeRangeHuman1 Год назад +1

    Yep as others have said,landing was a large amphibious assault hovercraft. The US has some enormous ones,European navies to a lesser degree, and the benefit is speed and ability to hover from water into land and unload multiple tanks/vehicles alongside troops,mobile artillery really anything you can think of. 😀

    • @MRXi0
      @MRXi0 Год назад

      It was a USSR made assault hovercraft in the video

  • @znail4675
    @znail4675 Год назад

    Even in ww2 so was there not only the main medium tanks we hear about, but there was also a lot more light tanks around then medium ones making things not that different to today with IFV filling the role of Light Tanks.

  • @tomeng9520
    @tomeng9520 Год назад +2

    U.S. Marines ride in Swedish Navy Hovercraft 8100, Berga Naval Base, Sweden
    ruclips.net/video/7BPuTL2GF8M/видео.html
    Important distinction: This is an UK hovercraft, not a Swedish made one.

  • @DanBergmanSE
    @DanBergmanSE Год назад +1

    The landing in the beginning is russian ships and vehichles

  • @kjelledbom1728
    @kjelledbom1728 7 месяцев назад

    I know u joked about denmark being frisky, was long time ago we had any real fights with them though we have been at war with Denmark more than 22 times. This is not included viking and earliar this is afterthe country became Sweden. But Gotland island have always been incredible strategic in the baltic sea. When i did my military service in the navy we did a week long Excercise around Gotland, during really bad weather. The storm was up to 40 meters per second. horrible condition but im sure was what the command wanted, makes the drills more warlike.

  • @kristofferhellstrom
    @kristofferhellstrom Год назад +2

    It looks like it's a BMP-1 driving off the hovercraft in the beginning of the video. Correct me if I'm wrong. So it can't be a Swedish hovercraft.

  • @kamran102
    @kamran102 Год назад

    About the vehicle off-loading a tank on the beach: a Russian military hover craft.

  • @FXGreggan.
    @FXGreggan. Год назад

    The hovercraft in the beginning you were asking about was a russian Zubr Class hovercraft, not a swedish hovercraft.

  • @TheSlugslinger
    @TheSlugslinger Год назад

    one thing they got wrong is that the AK4c is atm mostly used by the homeguard the "regular" military is using the AK5c and d but they are doing joint testing with finland to get a new joint weapon system that they have said they "plan" to put in the the field around 2025 and that system will replace the AK4 and 5 in theory.

  • @darnedghost2008
    @darnedghost2008 Год назад +1

    22:47 our King Carl Gustav XVI :)

  • @madeswe3165
    @madeswe3165 Год назад +2

    Yes! Putin has always been interested in Gotland. Beautiful island with a lot of history and where it’s placed… perfect for him. Well in his opinion. 😳

    • @rayceofhistory
      @rayceofhistory  Год назад +1

      Depending on what the objective is I think it’s one of the most strategically important spots that would have to be taken early on. A move towards Sweden couldn’t let Gotland stand, it either has to be taken or removed for all intents and purposes.

    • @karl-erikmumler9820
      @karl-erikmumler9820 Год назад

      @@rayceofhistory Russia really doesn't have the amphibious capability to land a major force under fire tbh. Unless they've completely wiped out our air force ahead of time it would be a massacre. Even if they have done that the Gotlands, naval mines and Gungnirs would take a toll on any naval assets. Whatever survives that gets to play with the tanks, IFVs, ATGMs, ect.

  • @Schenton
    @Schenton Год назад

    An old respons to your question at around 11.30 : People without a sword can still die upon them.

  • @kjelljohansson1799
    @kjelljohansson1799 10 месяцев назад

    Asout the CV 90 hatches. do you think the anemy that will be shoot at from thouse hatches will laugh and stand up be cause you can aim more bad from a moving vehicle? I think after my 27 years in Swedich army that if some one shot at me i will crawl down in the trench as deep i can, i dosent matter if it is a soldier on the ground or in the vehicle that shoot on you, it is led in the air either.

  • @tomassteen6092
    @tomassteen6092 Год назад +1

    I think it's a big hovercraft.

  • @No-nonsense-lady
    @No-nonsense-lady Год назад

    Thanks!

  • @andreaswennberg9542
    @andreaswennberg9542 Год назад

    I would guess, Sweden don't build bridges in general, larger rivers in the North is to wide and to fast flowing for pontoon bridges to be effective. If not, swim over is better. So probably don't have any spare bridge equipment for Ukraine, because we don't use them a lot.

  • @casvanleeuwen5280
    @casvanleeuwen5280 Год назад

    I heard in another video that thy will send beige equipment. But haven’t checked the source so take it with a grain of salt

  • @drzoidnilsson73
    @drzoidnilsson73 Год назад +1

    [EIDT: WRONG guess!] Doing the landing in the beginning must be a "Griffon Hoverwork 2000TD" which Sweden apparently have three(?) News to me however...

    • @assarstromblad3280
      @assarstromblad3280 Год назад +1

      New to me aswell but yes, seems legit

    • @rayceofhistory
      @rayceofhistory  Год назад

      I’m going to have to look that one up, I haven’t seen it.

    • @raxxo69
      @raxxo69 Год назад

      News to me too but doesn't look like that can carry armor?

    • @drzoidnilsson73
      @drzoidnilsson73 Год назад +1

      @@assarstromblad3280 I'm totally wrong. The Griffton (Swedish designation "Svävare 2000") can take one armored vehicle but it is a tiny two engine thing compared to the one in the intro. That is some USSR/Russia or maybe US piece? 🙂

  • @raxxo69
    @raxxo69 Год назад +1

    Think it's an American LCAC Hovercraft during a Swedish-US exercise

    • @rayceofhistory
      @rayceofhistory  Год назад +1

      Maybe it was that I just caught a glimpse of it, but it looked way bigger than any hovercraft I’d ever seen. It looked like a hovercraft, just a massive one.

    • @toedtoed
      @toedtoed Год назад +1

      I think it's a russian Zubr since they are showing other Soviet/Russian equipment at the start. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zubr-class_LCAC

    • @rayceofhistory
      @rayceofhistory  Год назад

      @@toedtoed I was thinking it might be too just based on how massive it was, but I didn’t know if that would fit the video.

    • @raxxo69
      @raxxo69 Год назад

      @@rayceofhistory look up the LCAC it's pretty cool..
      To my knowledge we (Sweden) don't have a landing craft like that

    • @Ragedaonenlonely
      @Ragedaonenlonely Год назад +1

      Yeah that wasn't a piece of Swedish equipment. We have heli's, but they're mostly on the smaller and lighter side.

  • @MaskinJunior
    @MaskinJunior Год назад

    No. 265505 Is my AK5 waiting for me untill there is a war.

  • @Stisse57
    @Stisse57 Год назад

    Ksp 58 any time of the day!

  • @rekke92
    @rekke92 Год назад

    Hype!

  • @matso3856
    @matso3856 Год назад

    It wasnt so smart to give the leadership CV90 without a bofors , they stand out from everyone else , which makes it easier for any opponent to focus fire on the leadership itself.

  • @Andy108953
    @Andy108953 Год назад +1

    Mission dictates, MOUT= Military Operation in Urban terrain then I would go with a light machine gun like the KSP90 (the FN Minimi) instead of the KSP58 (the FN MAG) meanwhile in open terrain like Forrest, mountains etc.. then the FN Mag would be preferred for the range and covering fire and so on.

    • @scruffy7760
      @scruffy7760 Год назад

      Ksp58 in urban setting. You want the 7.62 to punch through bricks and concrete

    • @Andy108953
      @Andy108953 Год назад

      @@scruffy7760 not walking around with it.

    • @scruffy7760
      @scruffy7760 Год назад

      Worked well enough when I did conscription 😅

    • @Andy108953
      @Andy108953 Год назад

      @@scruffy7760 nothing you do as a professional soldier, if you have the option of take out the KSP90 then you obviously would do that when your going from room to room clearing. The 58 is nice in defence but nothing you wanna haul around in an attacking formation.

    • @scruffy7760
      @scruffy7760 Год назад

      Where did my response go?
      Anyway. Short version. The 58 has been used by professional officers, conscripts, career troops and the Homeguard for room clearing... Since 1958. Don't know what to tell you 😅

  • @assarstromblad3280
    @assarstromblad3280 Год назад

    I dont think the first hovercraft was from the swedish army. Most likely either from joint excersise or completely unrelated.

    • @rayceofhistory
      @rayceofhistory  Год назад +1

      I thought it might actually be Russian, they have a massive one.

    • @kristofferhellstrom
      @kristofferhellstrom Год назад

      Hmmm I don't think so. Looks like a BMP-1 is driving of it.

    • @Ragedaonenlonely
      @Ragedaonenlonely Год назад +1

      @@rayceofhistory I agree. The markings certainly didn't look Swedish.

  • @axelsteater
    @axelsteater Год назад

    Zubr-Class

  • @hakanbodin252
    @hakanbodin252 Год назад

    Hey All ! At first so called "Libaralism", has A BIG Difference in Europe contra The US !! WHY !? So called "Liberaism" in Europe , is "tracked" to the "Middle-man" in the whole of Europe. In the US, "Liberaism", often is called "Communism", but is SOOO FAAR away from that !!! SO, in that Case, GIVE the "Right perspective" if the US for the coomon people, that we in Sweden ARE NOT "Communist"-people, but we care for eachother for example in common healthcare. You can Still Be, the The Most "Wealthy Man/Woman", if you can in Sweden (or in the World), but, in Sweden, We "Don´t forgot our own", but in a Social System compared with a Military System !! Is that the Difference in the US of being a "Democrat" or a "Republican", I don´t know !?!?

  • @uffestalhandske89
    @uffestalhandske89 Год назад

    Well my PSG 90😎

  • @petter5721
    @petter5721 Год назад

    IKV91 video here; ruclips.net/video/DLAz37FAcbo/видео.html

  • @axelsteater
    @axelsteater Год назад

    Russian landing craft

  • @andreasekstrand4623
    @andreasekstrand4623 Год назад +1

    First