A Swede reacts: When Britain NUKED the US .. Twice! (Mark Felton Productions)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 июл 2024
  • Thats why we do it.. Is it good enough? No, lets make it better!
    One LINK to rule them all!
    Click the link below to reach Merch, Patreon, facebook, and more!
    ⭐️linktr.ee/Reckyj⭐️
    🌹⚡️Don´t forget to subscribe and like⚡️🌹
    Mail Me Something ➥ The address is not public, contact me to get the address: reckhousegaming@gmail.com
    Thank you to all my Patrons and channel members!
    Join them:
    / @reckyj
    / reckyj
    ✔Like
    ✔Comment
    ✔Subscribe
    ✔Share
    Official Channel:
    / @markfeltonproductions
    Video:
    • When Britain Nuked Ame...
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Copyright disclaimer--"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    #usa #britain
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 59

  • @spursgog835
    @spursgog835 14 дней назад +10

    I’m proud that the Brits never let the cat out of the back. They are our allies after all.

  • @gabbymcclymont3563
    @gabbymcclymont3563 14 дней назад +11

    I just love the way Brits take the piss.

  • @Amandaarford83
    @Amandaarford83 15 дней назад +11

    What is scary is that we knew they were coming and still let it happen! The Soviet Union definitely would not have given us any warning

    • @leoleeuk
      @leoleeuk 14 дней назад +5

      Even worse part is America had empty sky's too and in a attack the sky's would still have loads of traffic

  • @nicksykes4575
    @nicksykes4575 15 дней назад +20

    Hi Recky, the Vulcan could actually fly at 63,000+ft they stayed down at 56,000ft as the Russians didn't have anything that could get higher. The USAF found a solution to the problem......They stopped inviting the RAF. Btw, check out one or two clips of "the Vulcan Howl", the engines on full power produce a noise like a banshee, and it feels like the air is being ripped apart. Also, Mark Felton manages to uncover stories from WW2 that no-one else does.

  • @savethebeesplantherbs8809
    @savethebeesplantherbs8809 3 дня назад

    so the birds find the prey the Vulcan was a first strike nightmare for anyone anywhere

  • @edhoward-bearder3081
    @edhoward-bearder3081 14 дней назад +4

    Have a look for the Vulcans only active missions, then the longest bombing raids ever. Search for Operation Black Buck during the Falklands War, the mental gymnastics to plan to get one bomber over Port Stanley is mind-boggling. It still is the longest raid, with the airborne support originating from the same base as the Bomber.

  • @davehadley3567
    @davehadley3567 14 дней назад +3

    Who else would you trust to this level? Testing your ultimate last line of defence? Probably best to ask a good friend.

  • @archiebald4717
    @archiebald4717 5 дней назад

    The Vulcan was an extraordinary plane.

  • @paulbromley6687
    @paulbromley6687 14 дней назад +2

    I wonder if the US also kept secret that their missiles would have destroyed the attacking Vulcans but that also was kept quiet also. You don’t give away your positives if you have had your negatives shown to be flawed.

  • @kennethfarrand-collins6405
    @kennethfarrand-collins6405 12 дней назад

    Agree, the only way you know if something works is to test it. Good react.

  • @25dimensionsfrancis42
    @25dimensionsfrancis42 14 дней назад +1

    There is film of a Vulcan doing a barrel roll which was then restricted to normal flight .

  • @andrewmoss3681
    @andrewmoss3681 15 дней назад +2

    Another great one Recky. This one has me chuckling. Our Vulcans weren't allowed to operate at their highest levels. I heard a tale I heard & hope is true (but I am Very doubtful it is). Apparently the Vulcan which landed in NY wasn't even noticed until it had landed & radioed in asked which hanger he could park his Vulcan in. We ran rings around the US here. The 2nd time we played a really sneaky trick. We changed tactics. This is the whole point of military mock engagements. Learn your faults. Learn from your enemy. Adapt to overcome the foe

  • @randalparks9648
    @randalparks9648 15 дней назад +2

    Maybe the Brits used the "Hush A-Boom" from the old Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoons show so nobody noticed! (I can't explain Rocky and Bullwinkle. Look up some of their old cartoons)

  • @punkpopnotdead
    @punkpopnotdead 3 дня назад

    you could say the air space was Lecky

  • @kathysutton-zy8ww
    @kathysutton-zy8ww 15 дней назад +3

    Recky, I would really like to see you and Carol react to “How America makes Britain Look Like a Small Village” by Lawrence Brown of Lost in the Pond. I realize you are in Sweden, not Britain, but this is the BEST video to show how big America really is. You will both enjoy it.

    • @william6682
      @william6682 14 дней назад +4

      Ever heard of David and Golieth? Bigger isn't always better, although Americans think quantity is better than quality ... strange nation the US.

    • @kathysutton-zy8ww
      @kathysutton-zy8ww 14 дней назад

      @@william6682 Who said anything about better? People who have never been to America frequently have a difficult time comprehending exactly how large the country is. The video does a really good job of helping others truly wrap their minds around the USA’s actual size. I recommended it because I’m sure they would enjoy it. I’m not trying to say anyone is better than anyone else.

    • @william6682
      @william6682 13 дней назад

      @@kathysutton-zy8ww David and Goliath.

  • @PHDarren
    @PHDarren 13 дней назад +1

    Skyshield 1 - 310 bombers (including 8 Vulcans) against 360 fighter interceptors (1,129 sorties)
    Plus
    Skyshield 2 - 250 bombers (including 8 Vulcans) against 1,800 fighter interceptors (6,000 sorties) and 250 missile sites.
    = Embarrassment

  • @davidbangtson3109
    @davidbangtson3109 16 дней назад +2

    I was completely unaware that this had happened. Apparently almost all Americans also were in my same boots. Things were so scary back then that I think I’m glad I didn’t know or I would’ve been much more worried about a potential Soviet attack.

  • @MelNel5
    @MelNel5 14 дней назад +1

    Like you, Recky, I think this was a good idea. You can’t fix it if you don’t know it’s broken. I think the reasons for keeping them secret were two fold. 1) We couldn’t let Russia know, because they hate(d) the U.S., and could possibly do something really stupid. 2) We were in the Cold War, and most Americans would have freaked out. I’m old enough to remember “duck and cover” drills at school. All classes would get down under their desks, and cover our heads. I remember thinking it was kinda dumb to “hide” from a nuke. I knew why we had them, but if one hit really close you’d be a burnt rotisserie chicken under your desk.

  • @austinseven4720
    @austinseven4720 14 дней назад

    I was lucky enough to see a Vulcan air display some years ago. The 'howl' is something else! Sadly, there are none left now that still fly.

  • @bonaggy
    @bonaggy 13 дней назад +1

    The whole point of NATO exercises to test tactics and strategies. Show up what works and what doesn’t, so that we can adapt or remove whatever proves ineffective. I think people forget these days that no matter how many smart systems we have, in war people will be killed. Our enemies have not sat idle developing their own smart systems. These exercises are insanely complicated to plan, and massively expensive to run, but I’d rather lose money testing our equipment and plans, than lose countless lives should a war break out because our militaries relied upon untested theories and assumptions.
    Dr. Felton is a great historian, but I feel he fails to point out the main reason the US clamped down on the outcome. Yes, a lot of the American military was embarrassed that the UK were successful, but mainly they hushed this up so as not to give the USSR a huge clue in what area to focus their own air developments. No boxer gets in the ring and says, “Oh yeah, by the way, buddy, I have a glass jaw.” There is no shame in “losing” if you learn from it.
    Have a great day.

  • @josephbucknavage6739
    @josephbucknavage6739 17 дней назад +17

    That's the whole reason why NATO runs exercises. Just a few years ago the US Navy "lost" an aircraft carrier to a French sub in a naval exercise. That one did make the news. Covering up failures is the worst thing you can do. Notice how the US air defenses learned nothing and failed even worse the second time.

    • @donnelson6694
      @donnelson6694 17 дней назад +6

      We should never be embarrassed by our failures as long as we learn from them.

    • @nicksykes4575
      @nicksykes4575 15 дней назад +5

      That French sub was actually a Swedish Gotland class sub, it also happened with a Collins class Australian sub.

    • @davetdowell
      @davetdowell 14 дней назад +1

      > Notice how the US air defenses learned nothing and failed even worse the second time.
      Failing the second time doesn't prove they didn't make changes to try and prevent it happening, it just proves whatever they did didn't work.

    • @AliceAndWonderland2
      @AliceAndWonderland2 11 дней назад

      josephbucknavage6739
      I could be mistaken but from what i can remember when i look into carrier event the US military handicap itself. The point of the game was to assess the ASW ability of a US Carrier by itself. The problem with taking this at face value is an Aircraft carrier is never going to fight a submarine by itself its going to have an entire battle group with ships specialized in ASW. An Aircraft carrier carries aircraft it is not an anti Submarine vessel.

    • @jishani1
      @jishani1 9 дней назад

      The US routinely handicaps the capabilities of their vehicles in joint training exercises. The point is to to fail in training so you see where to improve. And let's be honest, we wouldn't be able to learn anything from the other members of NATO if we didn't tie both hands behind our back first.

  • @TicketyBoo.
    @TicketyBoo. 13 дней назад +1

    As long as lessons were learned America should feel no shame. The important thing is you DID test your defenses and found opportunities for improvement. Let's not forget, these exercises were planned, the US knew those planes were on their way. In a real conflict there will be no warning and no time to prepare.

  • @inttrovertedmonk851
    @inttrovertedmonk851 13 дней назад

    We still do this every few years throughout the world with all our allies!

  • @suepoole8323
    @suepoole8323 15 дней назад

    You really couldn't make this up could you. Wish we still had this beautiful aircraft.

  • @charlesmaurer6214
    @charlesmaurer6214 14 дней назад +3

    Remember England invented both radar and sonar. The only shared the tech with the US when WWII was under way and just prior to Pearl Harbor, The site there was brand new and was ignored by brass on Dec. 7 as we expected a flight of bombers from CA. Nothing on the scale of the assault but our techs were still learning to read the returns.

  • @cbiln
    @cbiln 15 дней назад

    Hi Recky. When we were vacationing in Colorado Springs last month. My son who lives there. Showed us where NORAD is. To see it even from driving down below. Was a sight to see. I thought safe and scary at the same time. It is nestled way up high in a mountain and you can see all the tall poles ( I don’t know the name for them but like satellite poles or some kind of electrical poles). Leaves one wondering all what is going on inside that mountain, all top secret Im sure.

    • @william6682
      @william6682 14 дней назад

      What's going on in that mountain is the top brass is trying to figure out why all this shit don't work and hope the Vulcans won't come a third time.

  • @paulbromley6687
    @paulbromley6687 14 дней назад

    I wonder if it was misdirection aimed at the Russians who will have known what happened and so would have begun investing in research and development of an expensive time consuming high altitude bonber if their own, in so doing the US will have known they would easily have technology to deal with it but if you can force your enemy to commit to developing pointlessly then you are controlling them.

  • @rogerbarrett8744
    @rogerbarrett8744 14 дней назад

    99% effective, who knows what percentage efficient? Someone should have told the US that the first time was OK you know, allies and exercises etc. because we learn more from mistakes but allowing it to happen again is, Oh can't remember something about expecting different results.

  • @edithroberts8959
    @edithroberts8959 15 дней назад +6

    This doesn't surprise me. We were caught with our pants down on 9/11. Our military dropped the ball completely that day too, so this happening comes as no surprise.

  • @johnadey9464
    @johnadey9464 14 дней назад

    If they do still do it they would still not tell you.

    • @william6682
      @william6682 14 дней назад

      No, they wouldn't want to look dumb a third time.

  • @andrewgoodenough1809
    @andrewgoodenough1809 15 дней назад +1

    Now its worse as our new submarines are even better especially the new dreadnought class , also many many land exercises have been won by t g e uk national forces last year was a good example, us marines surrender too british commandos, having the largest best equipped military is no defence against experience.

  • @paulj3895
    @paulj3895 13 дней назад

    What is embarrassing is that the US fell for the same strategy twice!

  • @inthedarkanonymous5625
    @inthedarkanonymous5625 15 дней назад +6

    THAT’S why they keep changing their name. England, Great Britain, United Kingdom…good grief.
    They do not want us to find them!

    • @william6682
      @william6682 14 дней назад

      We don't keep changing our name, all of them are applicable. Everyone knows where we are, we are not hiding, but what could you do if you found us? If this video is anything to go by ... NOTHING.

    • @leoleeuk
      @leoleeuk 14 дней назад +2

      We don't keep changing our name it's just you don't know anything!
      United Kingdom is England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, four countries combined into a Kingdom. Great Britain is the geological name for the largest island that only contains England, Scotland and Wales and the other island is called Ireland that contains two countries, Republic if Ireland (Not part of UK) and Northern Ireland (Part of UK).
      We don't change the name, it's you that ignorant of other countries. It like someone saying you change the name of your country from America to USA and North America.

    • @william6682
      @william6682 14 дней назад

      Actually America has been caught off guard before the brilliant RAF did it. Remember a few years ago America got it's butt kicked at a place called
      Pearl Harbour. Taken completely by surprise two years into a global war.
      They should have learned something from that, but nothings changed.

    • @william6682
      @william6682 14 дней назад

      We don't change our name, you just don't know the difference (American ignorance). We're where we've always been for over a thousand years, just up the road from France, but if you can't find a Vulcan bomber over the US you'll never find a massive land mass called Europe. Oh dear, American education is on another level.

    • @william6682
      @william6682 14 дней назад

      Because your an isolated nation you don't understand the outside world. Because of poor American education you really should get some outside help to understand what those names refer to. If you want to find us we're where we've been for over a thousand years. But if the USAF can't find eight brilliant RAF Vulcans I doubt you can find the UK, Britain or England (all in one place) , we're close to Europe. where's Europe you say? Google it.