Karen Read Motions Hearing: Both Sides Argue About DNA

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
  • Case Against #KarenRead: The prosecution and defense presented arguments regarding the Commonwealth’s motion for a protective order about the DNA profiles of investigating law enforcement officers.
    #CourtTV Catch up on the facts of the Killer or Cover-Up Murder Trial.
    www.courttv.co...
    Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today www.courttv.com/
    Join the Investigation Newsletter www.courttv.co...
    Court TV Podcast www.courttv.co...
    FOLLOW THE CASE:
    Facebook / courttv
    Twitter/X / courttv
    Instagram / courttvnetwork
    TikTok / courttvlive
    WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE
    www.courttv.co...
    HOW TO FIND COURT TV
    www.courttv.co...

Комментарии • 40

  • @CourtTV
    @CourtTV  8 месяцев назад

    #CourtTV Catch up on the facts of the case against #KarenRead, Killer or Cover-Up Murder Trial.
    www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/?

  • @MM781_
    @MM781_ 8 месяцев назад +18

    Though I do find it very unusual for so many agencies to all be “covering up” a murder, perhaps that’s my hope that court system fulfills the objective of justice. However how the commonwealth has presented this case of what allegedly occurred that evening, physically does not make sense with his documented injuries by the states medical examiners. Even in the hypothetical scenario she backed up her vehicle striking John with such force to cause life threatening injuries, there is absolutely no way he would not have extensive injuries to his chest and/or back. If he was struck as deadly as the prosecution claims, why was there no broken ribs, collarbone, spine, etc.? Also, what would the cause be for bruised knuckles? As mentioned previously, JO was a tall large man, there is no way such a “direct impact” from her vehicle would only result in a minor broken taillight. If anything, the vehicle would have clear indents and more than likely the back window and/or rear passenger side windows would have blown out. Anyone who has been in a car accident would easily understand this. Furthermore, such a deadly impact of hitting him, there is absolutely no way one person in the entire neighborhood would not have heard such a collision as the commonwealth claims, it would be loud and undeniable. Quite a few attendees of the house left after the prosecution claims she hit him, how and again HOW could 6-8 different people coming and going that evening NOT NOTICE A 6’2ft man lying in their front lawn? I could go on and on about the facts based on the court document provided by both the commonwealth wealth and the defense. It’s clear, what is presented leaves undeniable reasonable doubt. I’m disappointed in MA’s sloppiness of this case. John was a great man, he deserves so much better than this garbage. May he rest in peace.

    • @Qbert2407
      @Qbert2407 8 месяцев назад

      Agree 100%

    • @KristenFitz21
      @KristenFitz21 8 месяцев назад

      No airbag deployment either. A year ago I was blown into a telephone pole in high winds. My vehicle tapped the pole and left a dent the width of the pole. All side airbags deployed. I drive a Toyota not a Lexus but I’d imagine that a Lexus would do the same.

    • @LeanneM-ku6zg
      @LeanneM-ku6zg 8 месяцев назад +1

      @mm781
      That was the best comment I’ve seen on any platform.
      True to fact and questions. True to remembering who John O Keefe was.

  • @kabbystevens5167
    @kabbystevens5167 8 месяцев назад +7

    Good idea Canton to get those samples tested…it has only been TWO YEARS!!!!!! Now the judge wants samples done quickly?????

  • @mighty0974
    @mighty0974 8 месяцев назад +3

    Dear all courts: please get ahold of this court for a recommendation on modern audio equipment. Audio is great here!

  • @lindafurr2404
    @lindafurr2404 8 месяцев назад +15

    I think all evidence should be included in the and every other trial. Too many people have been convicted only to have evidence show up that proves them innocent. She has a hard battle ahead of her. She’s up against the blue line gang and they will stop at nothing to blame her even if she’s innocent.

  • @debrashawcross170
    @debrashawcross170 4 месяца назад +1

    Sandra Birchmore, (Wrongful Death, was enrolled in the Stoughton Police Explorers program. (2010) Did John know something (Child Protection Unit)?

  • @abbidupray9720
    @abbidupray9720 8 месяцев назад +10

    FREEE KAREN READ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @Cvmac22
    @Cvmac22 8 месяцев назад +4

    what people don’t realize that aren’t from the area is that even if Proctor hadn’t seen Collin in 10 years Collins father owns a pizza place in the center of the town That Proctor lives in, Brian Albert lives nearby Proctor they all live in the same small town they all have kids there’s no way they could avoid each other even if they tried to

    • @mighty0974
      @mighty0974 8 месяцев назад

      25k people in Canton. Zero chance one person has run into all of them.

  • @isabelperez3094
    @isabelperez3094 3 месяца назад

    Why would the troopers not provide dna? Sounds fishy to me.

  • @MommaOG22
    @MommaOG22 8 месяцев назад +2

    How can she not be guilty?
    None of this makes any sense. And They say that If it doesn't make sense it's not true

    • @LeanneM-ku6zg
      @LeanneM-ku6zg 8 месяцев назад +1

      Because the autopsy photos do not match the prosecution theory.
      A vehicle backing up did not cause Johns injuries.

  • @itsmetommyplease4getmenot580
    @itsmetommyplease4getmenot580 8 месяцев назад

    Only can use the DNA on one item 😂
    They tried it 😂

  • @bethneel6749
    @bethneel6749 8 месяцев назад +1

    Who’s the turtle 🤓

  • @andremarais2706
    @andremarais2706 8 месяцев назад +1

    Loud sniffer ?camera guy. and loud inhaler counsel. Then compulsive hand waving by other counsel incessantly with pen in hand. Any wet farts? We are scoring 100% till now folks.

  • @Lucylu2114
    @Lucylu2114 7 месяцев назад

    The female lawyer is literally saying they are guilty 😂 of course she wants a private lab
    Of course she wants them protected because they are guilty
    This is disgusting
    They should stand trial just like every other murderer does

  • @DR.DisInfect
    @DR.DisInfect 8 месяцев назад +5

    Free the 🐢

  • @ArinPost
    @ArinPost 8 месяцев назад

    There is a simple way to solve this issue and anyone working in law enforcement who is not covering anything up world not worry about it and it could protect them even:
    They should make it mandatory for all police , detectives , people who show up at crime scenes immediately after the crime- they should all really just have their DNA profiles taken and c whether add them to codis or have a network for the data but they need to keep an active database because this kind of stuff is just growing as our population grows

  • @karenawagner2691
    @karenawagner2691 8 месяцев назад +14

    I don’t believe she is innocent. I believe she was so drunk and she didn’t know she hit him drunkeness is no excuse, just watching her actions I believe she is guilty.

    • @recentlyretired
      @recentlyretired 8 месяцев назад +11

      The question that keeps coming back is the Google search from inside the house at 2:27 on how long to die in the cold ? Also when the police and ambulance arrived the next morning in front of the house Nobody from inside the house came out to inquire what was happening? You would think a police officer would want to know what happened on his front lawn? Unless he already knew!

    • @DR.DisInfect
      @DR.DisInfect 8 месяцев назад +8

      It's possible but those injuries don't match up at all. At minimum the investigation was very flawed if not a huge cover up

    • @ThePete2432
      @ThePete2432 8 месяцев назад

      You are an idiot

    • @MM781_
      @MM781_ 8 месяцев назад +3

      Though I do find it very unusual for so many agencies to all be “covering up” a murder, perhaps that’s my hope that court system fulfills the objective of justice. However how the commonwealth has presented this case of what allegedly occurred that evening, physically does not make sense with his documented injuries by the states medical examiners. Even in the hypothetical scenario she backed up her vehicle striking John with such force to cause life threatening injuries, there is absolutely no way he would not have extensive injuries to his chest and/or back. If he was struck as deadly as the prosecution claims, why was there no broken ribs, collarbone, spine, etc.? Also, what would the cause be for bruised knuckles? As mentioned previously, JO was a tall large man, there is no way such a “direct impact” from her vehicle would only result in a minor broken taillight. If anything, the vehicle would have clear indents and more than likely the back window and/or rear passenger side windows would have blown out. Anyone who has been in a car accident would easily understand this. Furthermore, such a deadly impact of hitting him, there is absolutely no way one person in the entire neighborhood would not have heard such a collision as the commonwealth claims, it would be loud and undeniable. I could go on and on about the facts based on the court document provided by both the commonwealth wealth and the defense. It’s clear, what is presented leaves undeniable reasonable doubt. I’m disappointed in MA’s sloppiness of this case. John was a great man, he deserves so much better than this garbage. May he rest in peace.

    • @reneegardner2286
      @reneegardner2286 8 месяцев назад +1

      agreed, if she wasn't guilty..how could she waltz in smiling while being greeted with applause?! it's awkward

  • @ashleydaige4193
    @ashleydaige4193 8 месяцев назад +7

    Which one of your reporters needs to go back to 1st grade to learn how to count?! Did someone from court tv really say there were only 36 protesters??! 😂

    • @udhehfhehcuw9169
      @udhehfhehcuw9169 8 месяцев назад

      I could easily believe there were 100 morons out there

    • @scottrobertson9788
      @scottrobertson9788 8 месяцев назад +1

      You don’t think that was accurate, or close to accurate? I was working near there today and drove past at one point. Perhaps I missed the main part and people might’ve already taken off by then but I thought that number was just about right

    • @KristenFitz21
      @KristenFitz21 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@scottrobertson9788I witnessed at least 150 at 830am. I know how to count. It definitely thinned out while people sat in their vehicles to warm up during the hearing.

    • @scottrobertson9788
      @scottrobertson9788 8 месяцев назад

      @@KristenFitz21 I’m not doubting your ability to count, just saying when I went past a few dozen seemed about right

  • @bigbilly7865
    @bigbilly7865 8 месяцев назад +2

    🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢🐢