Best lenses for wedding and portrait photography
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 авг 2024
- What lenses should you have in your travel bag? Well, as a working professional photographer who travels the world photographing weddings and portraits, I know how important it is to have the right lenses in your bag.
In this video, I explain to you the lenses I have in my bag and what I use them for.
Shoot w Sal // www.shutterfes...
// My Everyday Gear //
Camera Equipment //
Canon EOS-R // bit.ly/3DFqwYg
Canon EOS-R5 // bit.ly/3cOtuQr
Canon RF70-200 // bit.ly/3NBMeRt
Canon RF85 f1.2 // bit.ly/3T7aiNs
Canon RF50 f1.2 // bit.ly/3E2RwTd
Canon RF28-70 f2.0 // bit.ly/3zK8O4Z
Canon RF15-35 f2.8 // bit.ly/3fwhDZh
Canon LPE6N Battery // bit.ly/3NxEv7b
Lighting //
Profoto Connect Pro Trigger // bit.ly/3UjhGGE
Profoto A2 // bit.ly/3zJ3Xks
Profoto A10 // bit.ly/3DXENkt
Profoto B10X // bit.ly/3U7Jlu6
Profoto B10X Plus // bit.ly/3sZT2Pn
Westcott Solix Video Lighting // bit.ly/3U8uK1N
Profoto Large Silver Reflector // amzn.to/3c2JOfW
Light Stands //
Avenger Baby Light Stand // amzn.to/3PiUiGB
Avenger C-Stand // amzn.to/3AGNjmL
Avenger Roller Stand // amzn.to/3c5QiuM
Manfrotto Nano Stand // amzn.to/3yTiaeI
Gitzo Monopod // amzn.to/3OoeBSb
Modifiers //
*=Personal Fav
*Westcott Eyelighter 3 // bit.ly/3zI7fEk
*Westcott Rapid Box Switch Octa-L // bit.ly/3NCk4WH
*Westcott Rapid-Box Light Modifiers // bit.ly/3t4pJes
Westcott Switch Inserts (use any light source) // bit.ly/3E1ZqMs
*Profoto 5ft Octa // bit.ly/3FL623d
Profoto 24in OCF Beauty Dish Silver // bit.ly/3zGUTww
Profoto Softlight Reflector // bit.ly/3zGVe2g
Profoto Clic Softbox Octa // bit.ly/3NyZNBg
Misc //
Weight Bag // bit.ly/3au1MYt
Rosco Gels // amzn.to/3amy8Vd
Profoto Clic Grid & Gel Kit // amzn.to/3ynKd4p
Profoto Clic Creative Gel Kit // amzn.to/3ar09uK
Spider Holster // bit.ly/3hdffGZ
Memory Cards // bit.ly/3WxBK9N
Educational Links //
Grow Your Photography Business - levelupsal.com/
Hands-On Photography Education - shutterfest.com/
FREE Photography Education - www.behindthes...
Follow Me //
Facebook - / salcincotta
Instagram - / salcincotta
Website - www.salcincott...
My rf70-200 2.8 is my favorite for sure. Love the compression
My go-to portrait lens is the Sigma 105 1.4 on my R6. LOVE the look, I have the 40mm for the low end.
agreed! love that lens.
70-200 f/2.8 definitely my go to when shooting Canon DSLR (1DMKIV). Now shooting Fuji mirror less and gradually rebuilding my lens collection. I should probably sell my Canon gear but I still love it.
lol... yeah.. no sense in letting those lenses collect dust... get that cash!! :)
I have the Tamron 70-200, and 85mm. And as you said, I’ll upgrade to Nikon in due time. Excellent video. You are a true professional. Thanks for sharing.
thank you thank you!!
Shooting Nikon since 1975, I have to say, great choice. I had my recurring rants, though (I also shot medium and large format). The Z system has silenced my 2 main rants. The lenses are significantly better, have ~no chromatic aberration and are very much alike in tone (color rendition). They improved in sharpness, but that was less important to me, and in focus breathing, and, and.
I never shot zoom lenses because in the past these were really inferior to primes. While zooms have become better, the Z "S" class zooms are on another level, especially the lenses with the LCD display.
So if you want both a 70..200 and an 85, then consider carefully that Nikon's Z 85/1.8S may be the sharpest lens out there, but their Z 70..200/2.8S is as good as their really good Z "S" class primes. This applies to the Z 24..70/2.8S zoom too (see comparison videos by UK Nikon School trainer Ricci Chera in YT).
While the "S" class zooms took away reasons to avoid them and stick with primes, I didn't buy them because the fixed focal lengths force me to consider viewpoint and perspective better, they are f/1.8 (more than 1 EV faster) and smaller. And, experience, I have n idea which lens gives what angle without looking through the camera - I need (want) to maintain that.
If "sharpness" is your thing, then consider that a Z 6(ii) has a fuzzy filter (*) while Z 7(ii) and Z 9 don't have that. The fuzzy filter missing, means better low light, more dynamic range and better color space. Because of its larger photosites, a "6" can go higher in ISO, though. The point is, to get 2 times the detail resolution of 24MP, the human eye needs 2x linear more: as linearly doubling a sensor of X*Y=MP gives 2X*2Y=4MP, this means that you would need 96MP to perceive mages as 2 times better - ceteris paribus and with lenses that can resolve both. But, removal of the fuzzy filer makes the 46MP better than you would think along these lines. Still, 24MP is only twice as good as 6MP and half as good as 96MP, ceteris paribus. Because MP are an area number. We measure detail resolution in line-pairs per millimeter (a unit of length, i.e. linear).
My 3rd rant was about the 24MP D-Nikon SLR with AA filter that could go into total reflection when shooting backlit. Because it's SLR, you don't see what's happening in the sensor, but I could end up with a bunch of images with a strong magenta color cast from light bouncing around between sensor and fuzzy filter.
Z 7 and Z 7ii can never do that. Fine cameras, but if you need top speed and AF in the absolutely worst light, then you want the Z 9.
There's a video on YT of a guy demonstrating the Z 9's AF in total darkness after he set the camera to "Starlight". My guess is that the camera uses an infrared light that he does not see, but the camera does see. Still, it worked miraculously.
That all said, technically, for most photography, 24MP is enough. Run your image through Topaz's suite (**) and you'll be surprised. If you want a camera in that resolution ballpark, the look at DX (APS-C) cameras because they very likely don't have a fuzzy filter.
(*) Fuzzy filter is my nickname for an Anti-Aliasing or AA filer or low-pass filter. These disperse of the light traveling to photosite [x,y] in the sensor, also to neighbors thereof. This makes raw processing easier: (1) the guessing the missing colors in a raw file where each data element (one per photosite) only has one color an consequently the two missing ones must be guessed and the given one adjusted. Raw processing happens in camera to JPEGs, non-raw movie, eVF and rear display updates. (2) it makes dealing with jagged edges easier, and potentially banding gradation.
With high resolution sensors, the fuzzy filter becomes a Pain In The Anatomy, to the camera's best performance, so Nikon removed it from the D800 in the D800E version. At the same time, processing power needed for raw processing had become strong enough to be able to do away with the fuzzy filter (Moore's Law). Also, having more detail makes raw processing easier.
(**) From Topaz: DeNoise AI. Sharpen AI. Gigapixel AI. Recently expanded with Photo AI. The latter analyzes your image and proposes how to improve it. If the fix is simple, Photo AI can do it. If more work is needed, then 1, 2, or 3 apps are used to improve the image. Note here that most color noise and luminance noise, or detail loss, are failed raw processing in another app. The information and detail are there, generally already.
Awesome video! Thanks!
Sweet set of lenses Sal. I just picked up the Fuji GF110mm. Can’t say it’s my favourite lens as it’s early days, but it’s very sharp wide open.
I totally agree with you Sal, 85 mm and 70-200 I use almost of the time to photography portrait. My dream is to have the 200mm but the price is to high.🙃😄
Sigma 85
Sports 24-105
Just got an R5 over the summer so rebuilding
My go to are 85mm 1.4 and a 50mm 1.4; specialty is the 135mm 1.4 (it’s butterlicious)
Own all of these focal lengths except for the 50 f/1.2. Still on the fence about getting it or investing capital elsewhere. Firm believer in doing what you can with what you have but yeah, I agree: use the best of the best if you can swing it. Good to see you, Cincotta!
For years I was one of those photographers that held off on getting the 50 f/1.2. I had the all the focal lengths a wedding photographer could need. I thought the 50 f1/1.4 was good enough. I was so wrong. I finally got my hands on the 50 f1.2 and its the most amazing lens I have ever owned. I thought the 85 f/1.2 was my everything. But the times i didn't have enough room to stand back to use it was a pain. I would revisit the thought of getting that lens. You will not be disappointed.
@@micknificent I appreciate the word of advice. I can totally see myself getting it because of the space issue. Add to that the fact that it would probably be a wonderful RUclips talking head videos lens and I’m sold. Thanks again
@@FranciscoAlvarezTV You’re welcome! I’m glad I could help. You’ll enjoy it.
@@micknificent it’s back on the Wish List thanks to you 😆
Thanks for the info about the R5 overheating. I have it and the R6 for backup and lowlight situations.
I have never had any overheating issues either. This is the best combo I have ever owned.
Glad to help.. and just wait til you get your hands on the new r6m2.... :)
@@SalCincotta1 it’s definitely coming. I’m on my way to the camera store now 😎
@@SalCincotta1 it will be here on 11/31
I used 28 to 70 mm F2.8 and 70 to 200 mm followed by 85mm.
70-200 2.8 RF Is my workhorse. And I’ve always told people invest in glass over body because a great lens is key to stunning images. Outside of proper exposure and composition!!
haha. so true. and agree on the 70-200
I've not seen the need to upgrade for years so got my trusty Canon 6D with the L series 24/105 F4, the 70/200 F4 for general use. If I do a shoot with a model I use the 36 mm 50 mm and 85 mm primes.
If I need to go lightweight I take the 600D instead.
i agree with you on the primes for sure!!
Great video. Go to lens for in studio is the 24-70 f2.8, outdoor: 85mm f1.2, recently the 70-200mm f2.8 has been used (both are rented). Now, waiting for the 135mm f1.8 to be available for rental to make a final decision on which lens to buy next.
love it!
I'm using all 2.8's:
24-70 is the lens I use most.
70-200 is my favorite.
105 is my specialty portrait/detail monster.
12mm is my fun lens.
And about an hour ago, I finished taking some eclipse photos from my backyard using the 24-70. It was so cold and as always; a meteor flew by and I totally missed it...again. 😭 😫
you had me until you said... "cold"... as i sit here in sunny florida. :)
still using a Nikon D5 DSLR . Nikon 85mm f1.4 is my fav lens
The overheating is long gone with the latest firmware. I've never had overheating in any mode now since the last firmware. I will admit that I avoided the higher recording video modes during the early days of overheating bc I never wanted to jeopardize my shoots. But now I don't worry about it. I'll run out of storage space before it overheats now.
I updated an original ef 24-70 to RF version because EF version broke. I feel it balances good on R5. It is my go to for capturing kids. I never had an issue with EF version but simply amazed at how much better RF lens is. Just bought 50 1.2 and planning to upgrade my 70-200 to RF also. For portraits I love the 70-200. It is just really heavy and long with that adapter. I haven't had the RF 70-200 in my hands to compare the difference. I've been afraid I couldn't resist the temptation so I'm waiting till I can actually buy it.
lol... you will buy it if you test it. its much easier to work with.
Good video, 70-200 2.8 is clutch and for studio headshots and the 85 1.4 for portraits and recently the 50 mm 1.4
you gotta try that 1.2 life... :) you will love it.
70-200 is my go to for many things
agreed.
I shoot weddings with 2 Nikon d810 dslr’s. I like my 24-70 f2.8 and my 85 f1.8. I do intend to replace the 85 with a 1.4 version. I also use my 70-200 f2.8 for larger venue ceremonies and certain formals. If I was loaded with $$$$ I’d probably sell it all and go with 2 Nikon Z9’s and get 5 Z lenses to cover from 16mm to 200mm. But being that I have 5 cameras, 11 lenses I’ll take a beating on the financial loss in selling it all.
yeah... its tough once you buy into a platform. i get it! it was tough for me to make the switch from DSLR to mirrorless and switch all the glass.
Hola , utilizo 35mm de sigma , rf 50 1.2 y 100mm rf ❤
Hey Sal, are you planning on adding the new RF 135 f1.8?
Sal, Thanks for sharing your bag. I am a professional with over 40 years of shooting. I get what you are saying and I am the same way. Buy the best for what you need. You shoot Canon and I am a Nikon shooter, yes we all have our faults..lol. I have to ask if you have used 3rd party lens that you might have liked? I have recently tried the Sigma Art series and have liked the results. Main reason I used them was because Nikon did not have what they had and also if they do the price of the lens was talk the price. Once again thanks for you video, I will be following to see what you will have in the future. Take care and stay safe!
yes... sigma art lenses i have found to be well built and incredible sharpness over the years. i think they have done an awesome job with their lenses for sure.
Just picked up the RF 100. Don't even have an rf camera yet. Upgrading my 70d to r6 m2. It'll be my go to for headshots. I'm mostly a prime shooter and haven't decided what zoom if any I'll get
the 100mm is AMAZING!! its a swiss army knife for sure.
I picked it up two weeks ago and absolutely love it. Since I have a few other focal lengths like the 85 1.2, 70-200 2.8, and the 28-70 I am not sure how much I am going to use it.
@@pianofinger yeah... i had to force myself to use it... it doesnt come to front of mind all the time, but when i use it - im always glad i reached for it! good luck!!
70-200...all day long!
My favourite Canon RF85 f1.2
speaking my love language.
@@SalCincotta1 I have Canon RF85 f1.2 DS
I noticed the Rode microphone, could you tell me which version of the Rode you have?
Sal--one other question: RF 85 or the new RF 135?
Great video as always, Sal. Quick question, what camera bag/backpack do you have there? I'm in need of a new one and looking around. Thanks!
ty ty. so this is a new one i picked up for travel - we were traveling in europe and the airlines are pretty strict... this is from think tank and its their airport international 3 - enjoy!
@@SalCincotta1 Thank you. Much appreciated. :)
1.2 85mm
24 to 70 2.8
You know saying everyone should have mirrorless and you don't know why anyone would still be shooting with a mirrored dslr.
What about the new RF 135?
video was made whn i was in milan - well before canon announced... now... that too will be in the bag!! :)
Sal--I often use the RF 28-70 F2 and the RF 70-200 F2.8. Wondering you're thoughts on whether the 85 F1.2 is worth adding on?
I have the 85 1.2 it’s incredible for portraits. So if you shoot portraits I would say yes.
@@SalCincotta1 Absolutely--thanks!
What bag do you use Sal?
i use the think tank airport bag and love it!!
I bought the canon rf 28-70 f2 and trying to decide between the rf 100 macro or the sigma 85mm f1.4 art lens (ef mount) to use it on my R6 body, will be using it for portraits /studio /weddings. Any suggestion which of the two primes to go for?
thats a tough one... for portraits - i would go 85!
@@SalCincotta1 how is the autofocus of the rf 100 for portraits?is it a bit slow as it's a macro lens?
Nice video.. the background music is really really annoying.
24/70 70/200 that’s all u need for weddings
you're gonna be cranking up that ISO without a prime in low light churches, etc. :)
40mm,135mm & 200mm for full fame
damn... all primes??
@@SalCincotta1 wedding is zoom, but portrait better prime
@@hoyinlee6804 i dont disagree with you there!!
Sal. If we relocate to Italy would you be interested in a partnership?
CARYLUX Photography
italy... count me in. :) i dont know what we are doing but if pasta and wine are involved im in!! :)
@@SalCincotta1
Imagine expanding your brand in your homeland. We are relocating from Texas to Italy and love your drive for perfection and productivity. If you had a presence in Italy 24/7 it is a win/win for all of us.