How Avalanche Will Outscale L2s | Emin Gün Sirer, John Wu

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 июл 2024
  • In this episode of Empire, Emin Gün Sirer and John Wu explain why Avalanche is the most scalable, decentralized L1. We start with why developers choose Avalanche, then quickly transition into the L2 debate. Emin explains why Subnets are superior and how the L2 vision and L2 reality are miles apart. We also talk about Avalanche's consensus engine, business development, the multichain future and more!
    - -
    Timestamps:
    00:00 Introduction
    01:01 Avalanche’s Core Thesis
    04:17 Why Build on Avalanche?
    14:19 The Problem with L2s
    19:08 Avalanche's Tradeoffs
    23:41 The Consensus Engine
    30:00 Learnings From Other Networks
    33:29 Solana vs Avalanche
    40:59 Avalanche’s Security Guarantees
    45:00 Business Development Strategy
    55:09 Warp: Communication Between Subnets
    1:00:01 On-Chain Governance
    1:01:41 Avalanche’s Community
    1:08:29 A Multichain Future?
    - -
    Follow Emin: / el33th4xor
    Follow John: / john1wu
    Follow Jason: / jasonyanowitz
    Follow Santi: / santiagoroel
    Follow Empire: / theempirepod
    Subscribe on RUclips: tinyurl.com/4fdhhb2j
    Subscribe on Apple: tinyurl.com/mv4frfv7
    Subscribe on Spotify: tinyurl.com/wbaypprw
    Get top market insights and the latest in crypto news. Subscribe to Blockworks Daily Newsletter: blockworks.co/newsletter/
    - -
    Resources
    Avalanche
    www.avax.network/
    Ava Labs
    www.avalabs.org/
    - -
    Disclaimer: Nothing said on Empire is a recommendation to buy or sell securities or tokens. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and any views expressed by anyone on the show are solely our opinions, not financial advice. Santiago, Jason, and our guests may hold positions in the companies, funds, or projects discussed.
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 84

  • @maxlawrence9910
    @maxlawrence9910 Год назад +28

    Crazy that it's not common knowledge how big of a breakthrough Avalanche Consensus is. These dudes grinded for years as researchers at Cornell and created an entirely new consensus mechanism. It's the biggest innovation in decentralized tech since Nakamoto's Bitcoin.

  • @bobharris5093
    @bobharris5093 Год назад +7

    Im so impressed with the quality of questions and the level of the conversation is so satisfying.

  • @meteb8622
    @meteb8622 Год назад +13

    Scalability is the most critical issue to be solved for mass adaption of blockchain technology all around the world. I believe that Emin Gun Sirer and his team will solve this issue with their subnet technology. Subnets have the ability to message each other. This feature helps us to build a future where everything will be different.

  • @LifeCodeGame
    @LifeCodeGame Год назад +30

    Great discussion on how Avalanche will outscale L2s! Really interesting insights from Emin Gn Sirer and John Wu. Highly recommend watching!

  • @jmart621
    @jmart621 Год назад +10

    The best part is hands down the shovel analogy Gun used when asked about the trade-offs of the "blockchain trilemma" (19:25)

  • @lcuie
    @lcuie Год назад +11

    Covered all corners with this one, so good

  • @slamslidestyle
    @slamslidestyle Год назад +15

    Great episode, awesome questions from Santi per usual. Great idea to have John doing these interviews along side Emin.
    Please don’t be that eth maxi that is close minded and dismissive of quality innovation. The subnet architecture allows anyone to have an EVM blockchain, with limited restrictions, and lots of control over technical parameters. I can assure you, this is extremely useful for institutions and is the only product of its kind today.

    • @christianjohnson3205
      @christianjohnson3205 Год назад +1

      This is why I believe Avalanche will work. It is built to work for as many people as possible rather than trying to push its token price to $1,000,000 a coin.

  • @contrabandi6475
    @contrabandi6475 Год назад +7

    Great job explaining the technology that Amazon and Alibaba formed a partnership with.... and excites Wall Street

  • @Happy-go-luckyTV
    @Happy-go-luckyTV Год назад +4

    What if a particular dapp is hogging up all the bandwidth on mainnet and decides not to move to a subnet?
    Is there a way to kick them off the mainnet and force them into their own net?

  • @cosmopolisosmo8635
    @cosmopolisosmo8635 Год назад +6

    İnformative discussion. Thanks

  • @dd91yy
    @dd91yy Год назад +3

    Interesting podcast. Thanks everyone

  • @korgond
    @korgond 11 месяцев назад +2

    Insightful interview

  • @therealestmc85
    @therealestmc85 Год назад +2

    You should interview Dominic Williams from Dfinity.

  • @Rpuerari094
    @Rpuerari094 Год назад +4

    👏👏

  • @gaussniwre866
    @gaussniwre866 Год назад +2

    The ETH maxi in the cap getting frustrated is hilarious. He can not punch any hole in the armor and if he is intellectually honest he would accept it by now.

  • @jasongrig
    @jasongrig Год назад +3

    not enough pushback on their claims

  • @mystic4215
    @mystic4215 Год назад +3

    Hey Empire team, please have Piers Ridyard CEO of Radix dlt. Radix dlt is trying to build a full stack solution to defi. They claims to build a chain which has infinite scalability without breaking atomic composability. Also they have Radix engine and asset oriented language Scrypto which will bring the "game engine moment" that early game devs experienced to defi.

  • @lherfel
    @lherfel Год назад +3

    evasive feel multiple times in this interview

  • @paezhenzy
    @paezhenzy Год назад

    uniswap is not building on avax

  • @kevinip7173
    @kevinip7173 Год назад +4

    Emin didn’t really answer the questions about what the Avalanche’s weakness’s and it’s trade off in the block chain Trilemma. In fact, he just deflected it as well, there are other trilemma we can talk about. Lol Avalanche has its niche, it’s sacrificing its decentralization to have better speed and security. And it’s fine. They said it already. They want to be regulated. They want to be part of the enterprise blockchain solutions. But you can’t walk around pretending Avalanche is still the crypto grass root products…

    • @ravindramathura7371
      @ravindramathura7371 Год назад +3

      What exactly makes it centralized in your opinion? Stake distribution? Number of nodes?

    • @christianjohnson3205
      @christianjohnson3205 Год назад +2

      He said, “Our consensus mechanism is different and doesn’t suffer from the same trilema as the older consensus protocols.”

    • @jmart621
      @jmart621 Год назад +4

      You're assuming there is a trilemma to begin with. As you stated, Emin mentioned Avalanche is not beholden to the same trade-offs that Ethereum, Bitcoin, are others are beholden to. This is due to new Avalanche consensus and the network's architecture. This doesn't mean a new magical trilemma appears. This means the other tech is not the best tech and Avalanche has at-least solved the issues those blockchains continue to deal with. @kevinip7173 @christianjohnson3205

    • @christianjohnson3205
      @christianjohnson3205 Год назад +3

      @@jmart621 exactly. He answers the question, quite clearly.

    • @kevinip7173
      @kevinip7173 Год назад +1

      @@jmart621 Did you just drink the kool-aid? The trilemma of security, scalability and decentralisation is inherently a constraints of our physical world. Unless you can teleport the electron, hence the data, we are always going to have this in "distributed systems", like Emin like calling it. The consensus is taking sample size of the data to come into consensus, it just means faster. If for whatever reason, the internet between Asia and the US had a 1 min delay, the cosensus would still cut it?

  • @DefiRealYield
    @DefiRealYield Год назад +6

    This guy sounds exactly like Alex Mashinsky

  • @anmolllll
    @anmolllll Год назад +4

    Man doesn’t realise ZK roll ups will not lead to fractured liquidity lmao

    • @gumgenius4012
      @gumgenius4012 Год назад +1

      That’s only one part of the problem, there’re still a multitude of problems that zk haven’t yet able to solve.

    • @darrenmims3106
      @darrenmims3106 Год назад +1

      @@gumgenius4012 such as? I'm genuinely interested to hear.

    • @chesterg.791
      @chesterg.791 Год назад +1

      I'm sure Emin is aware lol it's not like he is a world leading expert who created the first PoW blockchain or anything.

  • @dame5918
    @dame5918 10 месяцев назад

    The avalanche founder not the asian guy but the other guy is so arrogant, he is a hater!! And he seems very scammy... if we had a picture of a huckster he needs to be it 😂

  • @DefiRealYield
    @DefiRealYield Год назад +3

    This is so unlikely ; these guys are delusional

  • @Iliatjriw5562
    @Iliatjriw5562 Год назад +3

    another Ethereum copy cat

    • @ExcelBaller
      @ExcelBaller Год назад +8

      Wrong

    • @contrabandi6475
      @contrabandi6475 Год назад +6

      You're wrong. Educate yourself. Clearly you are not capable of understanding the tech, or you wouldn't characterize Avalanche the way you just did ...because your comment isn't based on any evidence.

    • @Iliatjriw5562
      @Iliatjriw5562 Год назад

      Why they are EVM compatible then? If they are that confident, why they did not come up with their own virtual machine like solana? They are literal copy of Ethereum.

    • @Iliatjriw5562
      @Iliatjriw5562 Год назад +1

      @@ExcelBaller prove me wrong

    • @ExcelBaller
      @ExcelBaller Год назад +5

      @@Iliatjriw5562 c-chain (a subnet) is EVM compatible bc the EVM is great and people want to use it, the x-chain p-chain also primary chain, but as you heard a developer can customize their subnet with any VM they would like- could even launch a rust based vm. I think people miss the point that at it’s most basic form, Avalanche is a VM agnostic set of validators that validate under a new consensus model according to whatever prescribed rules the creator of the subnet wants.

  • @BC-nl9ph
    @BC-nl9ph Год назад +3

    Absolute fallacy....AVAX will achieve absolutely nothing of note.

    • @ExcelBaller
      @ExcelBaller Год назад +11

      Already built a revolutionary consensus stop being a hater

    • @BC-nl9ph
      @BC-nl9ph Год назад +1

      @ExcelBaller it's not hate. Just my opinion 🤷 reeeelax brother✌️

    • @contrabandi6475
      @contrabandi6475 Год назад +6

      Educate yourself... so you can keep up with the advances Avalanche has made. If you are educated ..... speak to where you are having a hard time understanding.

    • @user-ri4qk1xy3c
      @user-ri4qk1xy3c Год назад

      @@contrabandi6475 lmao a ‘few understand’ in the wild. It’s not that complex, it’s not more complicated than anything a first year computer science learns.
      But part of the scam is convincing others that is high tech and innovative.

    • @crewyard9917
      @crewyard9917 Год назад

      Cope and seethe...