College Football Realignment FINAL DESTINATION
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 фев 2024
- Check out our new channels!!!
SEC - / @secvocfb
Big 12 - / @big12vocfb
Go to our sponsor aura.com/markrogers to get a 14 day free trial to secure your finances, information and identity. Get peace of mind!
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @markrogersvocfb
Check out the latest "Voice of College Football" merchandise: quality-network-merchandise.m...
Contribute directly to "The Voice of College Football":
Venmo venmo.com/MarkRogersTV?via=se...
PayPal paypal.com at markrogerstv@gmail.com
Cash App $MarkRogersTV
YOU'VE CAUGHT THE VISION. THANK YOU!
DISCORD, EXCLUSIVE LIVESTREAMS, WATCH PARTIES, PREDICTIONS, BETTING ADVICE AND INSIDER LOOK. at our "Voice of College Football" community at / markrogerstv
FACEBOOK - / vocfb
TWITTER - / markrogerstv
INSTAGRAM - / voiceofcfb
Shop AMAZON using this link to support "The Voice of College Football" (you don't need to buy the product displayed). Doesn't cost you a penny. Same shopping experience.
amzn.to/2v6j4TD
SUBSCRIBE and press the bell button for channel updates ruclips.net/user/markrogerstv?...
Thank you.
AUDIO PODCASTS at Apple, I Heart Radio, Stitcher, Spotify, Player FM, and Google Play
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
iheart.com/podcast/256-markro...
www.stitcher.com/show/markrog...
player.fm/series/markrogerstv...
DEAR PATRIOT WHO WANTS TO STAY CLEAN: We welcome you to Hero Soap Company - veteran owned, donating back to veteran charities, all natural products made from the highest quality goat milk, no dyes, fragrances or chemicals. Get 10% OFF by using the PROMO CODE: MARK
www.herosoapcompany.com/
Courtesy: 247 Sports, Rivals
#football #cfb #collegefootball 
Спорт
This looks like something you'd put together in a NCAA football game.
The graphic for Sec East is missing, not shown with commentary
Sorry about that. I was having issues with full screens constantly disappearing. I retyped the Big Ten 5-6 times. Don’t what the issue is.
Too unwieldy to have 3 divisions. IMO, 4 divisions with 6 teams each makes more sense.
B10 West: USC, Washington, Oregon, UCLA, Stanford, Cal
B10 Midwest: Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Northwestern, Nebraska, Wisconsin
B10 Central: Michigan, Ohio State, Michigan State, Purdue, Indiana, ND
B10 East: Penn State, Maryland, Rutgers, North Carolina, Florida State, Miami
You can maintain rivalries, IMO, like the B10 was already planning on doing. Or you go to the NFL model where your finish drives who you play from the other divisions every year. You could put ND in the Midwest to mitigate imbalance.
This
Stanford, Cal will never be added to the BIG. If the BIG gets FSU they will not add Miami. If ND changes their mind about independence, that's a big if, the BIG would add FSU and ND and shut things down. Option two, FSU and UNC. Option three FSU and Virginia.
North Carolina legislature is making NC and NC State a package deal, so they are probably off the table and will have to go to the Big12, unless one of the P2 actually want NC State.
@@troywest7045 they don't have to be together, the board just has to approve it after the UNC president does. In the end, UNC will probably go where they want if NCS has a stable home (big 12) and they schedule non conference games.
Stanford and California have no value to the BIG. Their worth 9 million a year to the ACC 😂
The problem with this is that the Big 12 still would have no marquee programs (a group of five power conference) and as such should not be on an equal footing with the Big 10 or SEC. This is reason alone for the two power conferences to pull away after taking the best of the ACC with them.
The Big12 is the fourth P4 conference right now, even if they don't admit it.
You lost me at Wake Forest, SMU, Syracuse, and Boise State being P3 worthy
Historically they are much more relevant than TT. But agree over the past decade you are correct. You seemingly have the same mindset toward them that the big 2 conferences have toward your own school. Which shows why NCAA football is in so much trouble long term. It hurts when you get left behind and the future is going to be just two conference dominant.
Yeah, the TV powers that be won't find enough value there. I agree.
Being lost is fairly common among the southern folks
You lost me at P3.
speak for yourself dude.@@mikebaker2578
Too many bottom feeders. The entire point of realignment is to consolidate the most valuable schools to maximize revenue so they can pay their players.
Pitt makes too much sense to be with West Virginia
I've got that in my dream scenario.
@@MarkRogersVOCFB With the B10 eyeing ND and FSU, AAU Miami would naturally make sense. The B10 only has taken 4 teams and the sec 2. Pitt not being a main priority could help the Big12 grab some higher end teams. We haven't seen more than 2 teams move at a time.
Only 70 miles apart on I-79 and less than a 90 minute drive.
Ohio St goes with Maryland Rutgers and Penn St. Pitt goes with the Big 10 Midwest
What happened to Boston College? Wouldn’t it make sense for them to be in the Big 12 with Syracuse?
Big10 and sec will each get to 24 teams taking the top brands from big 12 and acc forming their own league. The leftovers from big12 acc and g5 will have to form thier own league
The only big brands in the Big XII were already raided....
@kingsgambit7734 they'll want the tv markets though.
You do not get markets you already have. Can't get it twice. That is why Pitt makes no sense in the Big I. They already have the PA market. Pitt will have to go SEC so they get the PA market or to the Big XII. Same problem with GT in the SEC and several others. The tv networks get a premium mark up for having a team within the market nothing extra for adding another within the same market.
@kingsgambit7734 I think the sec and big10 will only get to 24 teams each and breakaway. They definitely wouldn't take teams like pitt. Gt maybe for the market, but probably not bc it's not a big enough brand. I could see FSU, MIA, NC, ND, KU and KSU all going to the big10 or ASU. Sec could add TT, TCU, clem, ok st, nc st, baylor and a few others
KU and KSU are not a large market. KU is a basketball school in a small state. What market are your referencing? Fort Hays? LOL Maybe Arizona and Colorado have merit but currently just do not see either. But a maybe... Nobody in Texas moves the needle excepting the two already grabbed. GT has the academic creds, the ATL location and arguably the top NFL producing state in the nation especially per capita. Everyone wants into that market. Pitt is a more quandary selection but it is about markets so maybe having the ability to charge all those pennsylvanians for the SEC network has merit. If you are looking for traditional powers...that also would be GT. They have 4 national titles and have won as many SEC championships as Auburn and they haven't been in the SEC in over 58 years. Nobody is looking at the Big XII. Those schools were available only a year ago and nobody came knocking. There is a reason for that. The question is how big does the BIG I and the SEC want to get and which ACC teams will garner those spots. All the others will be left behind. FSU, UNC and UVA are all obviously landing somewhere. The question surrounds Va.Tech, GT, Clempsum, Duke and Miami. Pitt and NC State are a step down along with Louisville. They are all wanting to land in the conferences that will be relevant but likely will wind up in the ACC lite. I truly do not believe the ACC will dissolve like the Pac 12. They will simply reload with smaller caliber schools like Memphis, USF, Tulane, UCONN, etc. rather than join the Big XII. But getting Arizona and Colorado do go along with Kansas certainly helped make the Big XII a palatable last option. TV markets is still the driving force making these decisions and the choicest programs are almost all plucked.
👎Notre Dame isn't going anywhere they make too much money as you mentioned a few years ago to even want to go anywhere. The only reason they would join anywhere is if SEC and B10 in particular stopped scheduling them ( play nobody don't get in ).
Exactly. That's how those two conferences in particular need to force their hand.
I hope you are right Mark. Not sure this is ever going to happen, but I can tell you put some thought into it. What would be tough is some divisions would have much outsized TV ratings compared to some others but it’s interesting food for thought. Great video!
You do a great job of capturing the rivalries into the new world. The CFP arrangement gets sorta clumsy as will any that builds off a 3 mega-conference structure, with an odd duck existing no matter how the arrangement. That complication may push toward an ultimate NFL-like 2 conference set up. Keep thinking, keep posting, you offer good stuff, thanks.
Thank you Mark Rogers.
Thanks for watching.
3 major conferences
24 team playoff
6 teams in the 3 major conferences that play for their conference championships all receive first round bye weeks.
2 additional first round bye weeks are awarded to the top ranked conference champions outside the major 3.
The remaining 16 spots go to the highest ranked teams regardless of conference.
first round games played at Cotton, and Peach, and random NFL stadiums. All second round games will be played at the home of the team that had the bye week 1. Semifinal games at The Sugar, Fiesta, Orange, and Rose.
I like how people are trashing teams like Boise state being added to the big 12 as if they would significantly impact the reputation of the Big 12. The Big 12 is and will continue being at the very bottom of the p4 hierarchy.
Boise State would upgrade the Big12 in football.
Funny as this is, because of TV eye balls, Tulane has the potential to move up conferences, maybe even a Houston or a Rice
VA Tech and Miami are rivals that go back to the Big East days.
They played one another (Big East & ACC), but they are FAR from rivals.
In your opinion. I know most Hokies can't stand them, and it is considered a rival.
NO WAY this would happen! The SEC will never stoop to bring in Tulane or GT. Those two willingly left and most in SEC are good riddance. Maybe GT but just can't see the state government of Georgia doing anything to help out GT since they all are UGA grads. GT will either be Big Integer or Big XII. Tulane will be completely left out. Same with S. Florida, E. Carolina, etc. Memphis...ok I can see them Big XII. Maybe put Pitt in SEC and GT in Big Integer so that both major conferences gain a new state for their tv footprint???
SEC won't share revenue with Memphis and Tulane. Those TV markets are already covered with Ole Miss (Memphis) and LSU (New Orleans)
This leaves Boston College as the last of the "ACC". They would likely do to the American what the PAC is doing to the Mountain West. That merger would have 13, which could go to 14 if UConn kills independence. Mountain West with 11 would be a weird number, so you could be creative as to cleaning that up. MAC has 13 still with UMass's move. Overall, I like how this massive realignment idea limits the effects of the "G5", only moving up a few to fit divisions.
Mark still or worked in the sports broadcast network. He understands, the TV partners will have some say so on who is added to B10 and SEC. These tv partners wants week tv matchup based on national branding, national rivalry, tv markets/state populations and CFB national tv ratings history since the advent of national broadcast along with cable into streaming. The teams that meet most of these things will be top choice for this. The top 3 teams are Notre Dame and Miami/FSU as a combo who will be mostly attracted to the B10 and their TV partners. Next in line is Clemson which could just be add to Notre Dame, Miami and FSU going to the B10!
Looks like the design principles are geographic and rivalry fits. On that level, superb design.
When the media money is the design principle, then this design falls apart.
Geographic fit worked well when media was not the major force in College football… sad change.
Did I just see an sec west with Memphis and tulane??
Yup. 2 teams NOT having SEC memberships.
I just heard GT. *ROTFLMAO*
Some people sure don't know the SEC.😑
@@waynebennett745 GT is in Bama's fight song and Georgia plays them every year. It would help balance out the schedule for the other sec teams while boosting the overall academics like Vanderbilt but also providing rich basketball history. There's a better case for them over a Memphis.
Tulane and Memphis are probably the hottest G5 candidates for expansion into P4. Tulane has had back-to-back 10-win seasons in football (including a bowl victory over mighty USC). Memphis is good at football and hoops.
Thank you for doing this video. This would have surely been a video gold and blue dude would have made
So Boston College Wake Forest, Syracuse SMU where do they go?
Liked the discussion overall. Based strictly upon regionality/rivalry, pretty good. But, do Wake Forest, SMU or Boise offer enough brand value for a BIG12 invite? Stanford and Cal.........not a BIG12 cultural fit at all. TX Presidents had a tough time extending a bid to UU due to "cultural" reasons. I can't see TX BIG12 Presidents approving Cal or Stanford.
Unless you have an even number of divisions in each conference that have the champions playing each other for the conference championship, the 3 division format doesn’t make sense other than the rivalry/regionality of this format. Because you can’t say that you’re a conference champion if you’re only playing a third of your conference. The ranking system is biased and this format would exploit that bias.
Theoretically, with three AQ’s each getting into the playoffs from the B1G and SEC there is no need for a conference championship game. Winners of each of the three divisions gets an AQ in the playoff. It won’t ever happen that way but theoretically it would work just fine. Throw in a couple of at large spots and it could work in the 14 team playoff they’re hashing on.
@@jansonroberts2616 what if there’s a 3 way tie in the division? And what if one of the divisions is not really good enough to make the 14 team playoff? Do the champions of that division still get in?
Somebody is gonna have to eat a big barrel of travel in your Big Ten proposal and who better than Wisky? Lol. Makes sense, there needs to be a dividing line somewhere and then the rivalries are huge but you can be assured Little Nicky, I mean Luke Fickell would take issue w traveling several thousand miles a year at every opportunity.
Tulane not sec 😂
These are always fun speculations, but I don’t think any of that’s gonna happen. If the SEC and Big Ten in this scenario were to happen, they would go pluck from other conferences, higher value programs. For example, they’re not gonna add an SMU they will go pluck a Texas tech or a TCU. The Big Ten will go after Cincinnati before it adds a memphis for example. Or a ucf before a tulane. It’s not a question of whoever is not in a power five is going to be added, it would be more of buyouts again, and pulling higher value programs from its current conference into an SEC or Big Ten.
SMU has more potential than Texas Tech or TCU. They have far more money, a bigger potential TV market, and are better academically (if that matters.)
You’ve got to go with the ravenousness of the fan base. By way of how often do they fill their stadium to eyeballs on viewing platforms.
Duke and Pitt aren't getting into the Big 10. Wake isn't getting into the Big 12. Neither are Boise and SMU. Virginia Tech, Louisville, Tulsne, Memphis isn't getting into the SEC. That made me laugh out loud it's so absurd. Realignment is simple. Does the team in question increase the media right value for the conference enough that the schools in said conference don't lose money? If the answer is "no" it ain't happening.
Dumbest list I’ve seen yet. No way the SEC would take on G5 teams. And the Big XII will get more than 2 original ACC teams
Love your divisions and conferences. Hate your playoff ideas. Here's the answer. Each school plays a 13 game schedule over a 14 week season: 7 divisional opponents, 2 conference opponents outside your division (one home, one away), 2 non-conference games (one each from the other two P3 conferences - one home, one away). The three division winners (based on overall W/L) and a wildcard (based on a predetermined formula) play a 2 game playoff for the conference championship. Then the 3 conference champions and a wildcard (based on a predetermined formula) play a 2 game series for the national title. At the end of each season, a formula ranks each team in each conference 1-24. Then, in the next season, that is used to determine the 2 non-conference game opponents (i.e. the three conference champs meet in the subsequent season). This system offers many advantages. (1) Each conference is guaranteed 4 (and possibly a 5th) team in the 12 team playoff. (2) Each conference is guaranteed a slot (and possibly a 2nd slot) in the "final 4." (3) Excitement will build as losing teams fight for a wildcard slot. (4) Non-conference games will be of high quality because the best teams are matched up. (5) Non-conference games are important because they contribute to the overall W/L record.
Okay I did a revision of the Non Autonomous Conferences and recreated two super mega conferences of the Group Of Colleges and this is what I came up with. Please appreciate the work I put into this.
The G5 Conferences Morphed Into 2 Mega Conferences of AASunBelt And MAC/Mountain
- [x] AASB Military Northern
Boston College
UCONN
Air Force
Army
Navy
Wyoming
Colorado St
Delaware
Temple
JMU
Buffalo
ODU
- [x] AASB South Atlantic
Liberty
Marshall
App State
Charlotte
CCU
Georgia Southern
Georgia State
UAB
USF
FAU
- [x] AASB Gulf Plains
Troy
South Alabama
Southern Miss
Rice
La Tech
Texas State
UTSA
UNT
Tulsa
Arkansas State
- [x] MAC\Mountain North
UMASS
Akron
NIU
WMU
CMU
EMU
Kent
Toledo
Ohio
Miami-Ohio
- [x] MAC\Mountain South
Ball St
WKU
MTSU
Kennesaw State
FIU
Jax State
ULL
ULM
Sam Houston State
SFA
- [x] MAC\Mountain WesternPac
UTEP
New Mexico St
New Mexico
Utah State
UNLV
Nevada
San Jose State
Fresno State
San Diego State
Hawaii
ESPN has as good chance of witholding ACCconcealment as StephyASmith modeling
That's an insightful and well done realignment Mark.
I think that this is generally correct and in line with what I suspect is the thinking of the B10 & SEC & where these 2 conferences want to go. I could quibble with the placement of several schools and where I think they will land versus where you place them.
But overall, this was a very thoughtful exercise that will end up being 85-90% accurate after the remaining realignments of the ACC, PAC2, & Mountain West conferences…
This assumes a leader or committee to agree and the money issue with the network resolved.
Meant networks
If this Is about football, then why don’t you have State and Carolina in the same conference!!!🤬🤬
WOW! This is way out there. WHY would The Big 12 take Wale Fprest. It's NOT HAPPENING! lol
GBD is looking down smiling
No he isn't. He wanted them in the ACC. :)
Were this to happen, i feel the playoffs should be an 8 team. No conference championship but each division winner is in with the worst record being left out.
If you are going to have Boise st, you need Fresno st???
Though the graphic didn't show up the SEC South. It's gross and i'm here for it! Also the big ten west We'll get clowned on for anybody that comes out of it no matter what I Love it and hate it all the same time.
Brilliant, just no division and conference championship games, UNLESS they are simultaneously part of the college football playoff.
The proposed conferences/divisions make a lot of sense. Especially in terms of travel. I like it! Well done, Mark!
lol. No, they don't. You think Coral Gables to Pittsburgh makes sense travel-wise? The Big Ten West is ridiclous, too, but that's what happens when you have a Midwest conference with 4 teams from the West Coast.
Appreciate your “Fantasy” college football divisions effort. But it’s fantasy When you don’t have WVU vs Pitt, when you have Tulane in the SEC (remember they left the SEC in the 1960’s because they couldn’t compete) your model’s credibility blew up. Fan don’t want 8 team divisions, that why divisions went away. You should go back to your ACC team’s value videos and build from there. Duke will end up in the B12 if the ACC breaks up.
I guess Mark is not taking into account that media partners are not paying for many of these schools.
No school in the SEC or BIG is taking a pay cut to add schools
Not only that, but if the B1G does add any schools before the next media deal, they can't screw over Oregon and Washington by giving them anything over a 50% share. My guess is though if offered a 50% share until the next media deal ACC teams would jump at it.
Eh, screw it. Disband the ACC entirely. Have Miami, FSU, GT, Clemson, and all four NC schools go to the SEC. Have both VA schools, Louisville, Pitt, Syracuse, and BC go to the B1G. As for the Big XII, have UCF go to the SEC and have UWV and Cincy go to the B1G. HOWEVER, put Memphis in the Big XII and have the Big XII pick off teams from the Mountain West. And, voila: three major Super Conferences.
I noticed no Navy, Army, or Air Force in any of these conferences. So I will create the following AAC best of the G5 schools remaining that are not in your realignment configuration.
__________________
AAC Pacific
__________________
Fresno State
San Diego State
San Jose State
Hawaii
Nevada
UNLV
New Mexico State
New Mexico
___________________
AAC Mountain Plains
___________________
Colorado State
Wyoming
Utah State
UTSA
UNT
Tulsa
Texas State
Arkansas State
_______________________
AAC Military Atlantic
_______________________
USF
Air Force
Army
Navy
CCU
App St
Liberty
FAU
I know there are several other schools available and could make a second and third Non-Autonomy mega 24 team conference if one wants to.
SEC = AFC; B1G = NFC. 34-Team Super League w/playoffs identical to the NFL Playoffs (byes, wildcards, etc) ~ Big Ten and the SEC keep ALL the Playoff $$$😆
I like that idea but they should probably expand to 40 to 50 teams total to cover every region of the country. The B1G and SEC already have 34 members now and they still have to add ND, FSU, Clemson, UNC, Miami, UVA or VT, Arizona or Arizona State, Stanford or Cal (because they are in a Top 10 market), Kansas or KSU, Utah, Colorado, and maybe another team or two our of Texas (because it's a large and populated state).
Great work, Mark!!! Your Big 12 and B1G realignment make perfect sense.
The SEC tv contract money per school would decrease with so many new schools that are subpar in tv interest. I don't think the SEC would add new schools that don't add revenue to the conference.
Still, a fantastic job of keeping regional and rivalries together!!!
Agreed! They would take Pitt so that they get the premium for the Pennsylvania market. But he has them going Big Integer which makes no sense from a financial stand point. The big I already gets the premium membership fee in that state.
Wake Forest may be done. They may need to drop down to FCS after all this. They don't have enough TV eye band to survive. Duke may have the same issue as far as football goes
A bunch of teams you have listed are not making power conferences. Big Ten and SEC will pick the top 2-4 ACC teams off amongst them, a few leftovers to the Big 12, and the rest going the way of Oregon St. And WSU. No way Group of 5 teams are getting into the SEC. I mean c'mon.
Colorado state!!!!!!!!!
As a PSU fan, yeah, Pitt will never be in the B1G. We'd leave first... LOL
Didn't we just get rid of divisions? I don't see Washington State or Oregon State going to the Big 12 unless the can't make a deal with the Mountain West to restore the Pac-12.
I really hope this doesn't happen leave the weakest conference to go to basically the same thing if your fsu. That division is weak asf in foitball
Pitt & Va Tech are the only teams the Big 12 wants.
Makes too much sense. Power brokers will likely never arrive at this end point - so my inner cynic says......
That makes sense the way you put those leagues together
Nope! It is based on the old historical, geographic model. It is currently about tv markets to gain the premium fees for having a team from that state. So Pitt to the SEC...OK, now the SEC gains the Pennsylvania premium mark up that the Big I already has there. Put GT in the Big I and the Big I network now gets a premium in the Georgia market, etc.... No way Tulane gets back in the SEC. I burst out laughing when I saw that one.
FSU/UF has been and will again be a Top 5 ratings monster. You take that game away and give FSU Rutgers & Maryland in return, Really?? That in addition to re-linking them to several old ACC teams - Duke, Pitt, UNC, Miami (albeit a rival). This doesn’t check the biggest games, biggest ratings box.
Wrong! The Miami vs FSU game since 1979 has been a best and most significant state rival and national rivalry. The game itself has been ratings monster overall in that time period!
Oh by the way, Miami has national rivalry with Nebraska, Ohio State, Penn State and Notre Dame in that same time period!
@@arronfrazier7873 You’re assuming I’m not valuing the FSU/UM rivalry (or considering it top tier). I’m saying for FSU, both are ratings monsters as they were in the ‘90’s and can be again when the national champs went through the state of Florida.
@@arronfrazier7873 Also, all those other competing teams you mentioned FSU played them as well (some multiple times). Big difference between playing someone a couple times and a Rival.
How many teams have won national title in the last 50 years? How many teams have won multiple national titles in the last 50 years? How many teams currently based on recruiting, history, money, located and etc have a chance to win a national title on a yearly bases? Guess what! Miami would be one of the teams in all the questions!
Georgia Tech and Miami are done. They'll be lucky to get an invite from the Big 12
Lmao. Miami is a National brand
I'll have what he's smoking... 🤣🤣🤣
You seem to be missing the contraction part of this realignment as well as all sorts of cultural and other non-athletic factors. The vid seems to be click bait that your channel usually avoid.
There is now no feasible path to a peer P3.
So you really think the SEC would add Tulane instead of Okie State to bring the bedlam rivalry into their conference? Seriously? Just say you don’t like the SEC and would rather trash them than be serious about their expansion candidates. At least you’d get more respect keeping it real. Memphis? GT? Tulane? Put down the pipe.
your missing a school that from what i heard as of yesterday will stop what this. no north carolina st
They were in his model but the SEC Eastern Division's slide wasn't showing. He said NC State, Clemson, and GT would join Bama, Auburn, UGA, Florida, and South Carolina.
@@roris5882 ok good, i did not hear that. i did hear on another video that the state gov of north carolina will not let NC and NCS be split up. that the POWER 2 will not take some of the schools as per the plan in this video. not that it matters to me. the B10 is going national. the SEC is going regional. going with that train of thought i would think the B10 would want one school in Texas. not sure which one that would be but i am thinking A&M
@@PEJZ503 A&M is SEC through and through. B1G could grab TCU, Texas Tech or Baylor easily. The city of Houston would give the B1G another huge tv market. Two options there are Rice (AAU) or University of Houston.
@@roris5882 Georgia Tech isn't going to the SEC
@@brentmoretz4104 I never said they were but Mark, the host, had them in his model. Pitt also isn't going to the B1G because they already have Penn State, the flagship university in Pennsylvania. So they don't gain anything by aquiring the secondary schools within the region they already control. Infact all their existing members would lose revenue from adding them.
Too many teams two conferences, 24 teams each.
That could be it. That’s on my list to address.
This is dumb and WILL NOT come close to this
FIRST, your graphic for SEC South division wasn’t displayed!! Had to use my imagination as I couldn’t see the schools listed.
Second, an overall noble piece of work that finds “MOST” teams homes, but it’s pure Fantasy Land. Simply too many teams getting elevated to lofty status in conferences they have not come close to earning. Tulane and Memphis in the SEC?? Really? Everything is diluted!!
THIRD, Florida State, which HAS earned B1G/SEC status (and probably paid upwards of $150M+ to escape the ACC) finds itself technically BACK in the ACC (Duke, Pitt, UNC, Miami [albeit a rival]) and WEAKEST B1G division with the likes Rutgers and Maryland? Sorry fellas, this division is a slap in the face to all FSU’s efforts/$$$, and frankly discredits a lot of good thinking elsewhere. No way you can believe FSU would be remotely pleased with this, OR other B1G powerhouses/fans (OSU, Mich) that want annual home & homes against each other.
And yes, I buried the lead!!
Impressive design!!!!
I do not see Tulane and Memphis in the SEC at all....I do not see that.... TOO, I know you are a B1G supporter....so, some of this to ME, is not it... Sankey is not going with Memphis and Tulane....it makes NO SENSE !!!!
These conferences will look nothing like this at all they abandoned Oregon State and Washington State so expect more of the same the impact of some of these schools on the sport is non-existent so the best bet is to build a conference of their own
Too many mouths to feed. The BIG and SEC are looking to sepsrate from the other conferences and take most of the money. I woul love it...but seriously doubt this has any chance.
It all makes sense and I really like it. Which is why it sadly will never happen.
So true.
Bruh.
Does not make sense.
Nice alignment, Mark. Playoff should be NFL style in the B1G and SEC. The Natty would be the winner between the B1G and SEC Playoff winners.
Way too early April fools?
It’s not happening
Yeah, I don't believe so either. Just having fun with it.
So proud of FSU. Exposing ESPN/Disney antitrust violations with college football
ACC vs B-12 = USFL
Clickbait
You lost credibility with this video. It's about as valid as some kids that concoct their scenarios with absolutely NO knowledge of college football, Sports, or even Why and What colleges exist for! Definitely the mark of a fan of the No Fun League
This is not a prediction. If you don’t like my content, please stop watching.
Total Sense - NOT
Please explain. It’s easy to criticize and not back it up.
@@MarkRogersVOCFB B1G gets all the quality teams, Big 12 gets crapped on. Try swapping the additions and see how you feel, even tho that would do the most to balance the playing field. You're obviously as greedy as the B1G & SEC leaders. I won't waste time on your garbage anymore.
Check my posts to ser my proposed Big 12. We'll never catch the greedy 2 in football, but we will do well in December thru March, plus a week or 3 on either end..
As usual - this is Mark's wheelhouse - broad CFB issues. Really enjoy his analysis.
I appreciate the support and taking time to leave a comment.