Emergency DOOR BLOWS OUT mid-air. Alaska Boeing 737 MAX 9 returns to Portland. Real ATC
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 июн 2024
- THIS VIDEO IS A RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FOLLOWING SITUATION IN FLIGHT:
05-JAN-2024. An Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 9 (B39M), registration N704AL, performing flight ASA1282 / AS1282 from Portland International Airport, OR (USA) to Ontario International Airport, CA (USA) during climb out of Portland, at about 16500 feet, started rapid descent down to 10000 feet, declared an emergency and reported depressurization. The airplane returned back to Portland safely. As it was reported the section of airplane had blown out mid-air and the airplane landed with a hole on the left side of the fuselage.
Join me on Patreon: / you_can_see_atc
#realatc #aviation #airtrafficcontrol
Image from thumbnail was provided by a passenger.
_______________
Timestamps:
00:00 Description of situation
00:17 Alaska 1282 climbs out of Portland.
01:05 The fuselage blows out. The plane starts the descent. The pilots declare an emergency
03:02 The flight crew contacts Portland Approach controller. They continue descent
05:39 ASA1282 was transferred to the frequency of Tower controller
06:17 Landing
_______________
THE VALUE OF THIS VIDEO:
THE MAIN VALUE IS EDUCATION. This reconstruction will be useful for actual or future air traffic controllers and pilots, people who plan to connect life with aviation, who like aviation. With help of this video reconstruction you’ll learn how to use radiotelephony rules, Aviation English language and general English language (for people whose native language is not English) in situation in flight, which was shown. THE MAIN REASON I DO THIS IS TO HELP PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND EVERY EMERGENCY SITUATION, EVERY WORD AND EVERY MOVE OF AIRCRAFT.
SOURCES OF MATERIAL, LICENSES AND PERMISSIONS:
Source of communications - www.liveatc.net/ (I have a permission (Letter) for commercial use of radio communications from LiveATC.net).
Map, aerial pictures (License (ODbL) ©OpenStreetMap -www.openstreetmap.org/copyrig...) Permission for commercial use, royalty-free use.
Radar screen (In new versions of videos) - Made by author.
Text version of communication - Made by Author.
Video editing - Made by author.
HOW I DO VIDEOS:
1) I monitor media, airspace, looking for any non-standard, emergency and interesting situation.
2) I find communications of ATC unit for the period of time I need.
3) I take only phrases between air traffic controller and selected flight.
4) I find a flight path of selected aircraft.
5) I make an animation (early couple of videos don’t have animation) of flight path and aircraft, where the aircraft goes on his route.
6) When I edit video I put phrases of communications to specific points in video (in tandem with animation).
7) Together with my comments (voice and text) I edit and make a reconstruction of emergency, non-standard and interesting situation in flight.
Legend says that ATC is still asking for the nature of the emergency, the pilots' intentions and fuel and souls on board
😂
its because of the following! In aviation, both "Mayday" and "emergency" are used, but they have specific meanings and applications:
Mayday: In aviation, "Mayday" is a distress call used in voice communication, primarily over the radio. It indicates that the aircraft is facing a life-threatening emergency, such as engine failure, fire, or loss of control. The pilot uses the word "Mayday" three times at the start of the transmission to alert air traffic controllers and other nearby aircraft to the severity of the situation. Following the distress call, the pilot provides information about the nature of the emergency, the aircraft's position, altitude, and intentions.
Emergency: In aviation, "emergency" is a broader term and can refer to any situation that requires urgent attention but may not be immediately life-threatening. Emergencies in aviation can include situations like medical emergencies on board, fuel shortage, or a pressurization problem. Pilots may declare an emergency to receive priority handling from air traffic control, but without using the specific "Mayday" distress call. Instead, they might use the term "Pan-Pan," which indicates an urgent situation that is not immediately life-threatening.
The key difference in aviation is the level of urgency and threat to life: "Mayday" is reserved for the most serious, life-threatening emergencies, while "emergency" can cover a broader range of urgent situations that require prompt attention but are not as immediately dire as those warranting a "Mayday" call.
Yeh. Pilots are swamped but tell us all this un-necessary info, right now, and now and now and now.
she should have just said the emergency door was blown away
She probably did not know at the time
Pilot: We are depressurized .
Center: State the nature of the emergency
Pilot: We are depressurized
Center When able, state the nature of the emergency.
Pilot: We are depressurized
Pilot to Approach :Hey Portland Approach, Alaska 1282, emergency aircraft....... etc.
Approach:Did you declare an emergency or just need to return to..
Pilot: YES, we are an emergency, we are depressurized... provides fuel information and passenger number.
Approach: Just say again your fuel and passengers aboard
I kid you not. This actually happened.
She really should have said "We had a rapid decompression".
You wrote a little screenplay. Nice job.
@@Flies2FLLshe really should have said “Are you ####### kidding me??”
@@Flies2FLL Is there any other kind at 16,000'??????
@@JMHTruck32005 The verbiage would get the point across better.
From a New York Times article this morning (no wonder the pilot was so freaked out!):
"Ms. Homendy said the force of decompression during the Friday incident blew the cockpit door open, causing one of the pilots to lose a headset. Head rests were detached from seats, seat backs went missing and clothes were scattered throughout the plane."
Thanks for the information 👍
It also blew the check list out of the cockpit so they had to go from memory..
ATC: Be that as it may, please state fuel left, nature of the emergency and souls on board.
And describe the available dinner options. @@SeanEidge
i also read that a co-pilot’s hairpiece went flying too!
The pilot did a good job. You could tell by her voice that she was stressed. Thankfully there was no loss of life in this incident. The ATC's could have done a better job, especially the first one who seemingly didn't understand the situation at all.
ATC could have done a much better job. Pilot was excellent
She was the pilot monitoring NOT flying!
@@sotm6078in fairness I think the whole flight crew gets a pass on being a wee bit stressed given that they’re suddenly flying a 737 convertible….
It's also difficult to talk through a mask...
@@sotm6078rRight! Thank god the PIC kept their wits...this one sounded freaked out in the beginning.
This was painful to listen on the part of the ATCs. Even when crediting them that the pilots were on masks, a lot of information was lost by the time the handover to approach occurred.
I mean seriously “did you declare an emergency?” How can the controllers not have had that information!
ATC did a really medicore job. Too many questions, too little listening.
@@TeslaTitan I was thinking that too. But first we do not know if they squawked 7700, that would show them having an emergency on the radar screens. Now we saw an "EM" here in the video, but that is probably set manually by the creator of the video. And if they did not squawk 7700, the atc had to forward it via there system of calling the other controller via phone. And that also takes some time. So that information just could not have reached the next controller yet as he was contacted by the emergency airplane.
@@Ztbmrc1 The controllers can (and should!) still talk to reduce the workload of the pilots, if at all possible
@@TeslaTitanPortland ATC is terrible. They have made a lot of mistakes over the last couple of years.
Dude, how many times does she have to repeat they declared an emergency?! Glad everyone is ok.
This is not abnormal; planes are handled by different controllers, before take-off, after take-off, and then if they need to return, they have to change to arrivals.
It seems there aren't any communication between the various controllers, excepted for the fact a plane is Emergency. They ask the same questions over and over.
And it matters why?
As they get passed off from different controllers enroute it’s critical they advise ‘emergency aircraft’ otherwise they are assumed just a normal flight.
Hearing ‘Emergency’ in one’s headset will get undivided attention!
@@57Jimmy She did say “emergency aircraft” when she got handed off to approach, and approach still asked her 10 seconds later if she was declaring an emergency
Not funny. But I’m sure you’d do a better job in her situation (not)
The plane was landed safely w/no loss of life in a very adverse situation with a catastrophic potential. Amazing job by the pilots.
Not really sure what part of a quick descent, approach and landing was amazing...hmmm
Nothing amazing as far as we know by now. Not even a rapid decend, just line up on the ILS. Also had more than enough trackmiles to the treshold
On initial contact the pilot and controller, both female, were garbled and rushing their messages showing a lack of calm that is required to bring such situations to the best possible outcome!
The pilot could be calmer in the beginning
Lmao look at all these bots ^^^
That first controller absolutely had no clue what to do! Stunning
Not all depressurizations are emergencies.... an open door would be
A depressation usual means the aircraft failed to pressurise and the oxygen masks drop. Not that the window fucking disappeared lol. It's usually handled well by dropping to breathable attitude
Not helped by 'uh we'd like to go down' rather than a clear 'Mayday Mayday Mayday' from the pilot.
Bit of a sh!t show. Hope NTSB use this audio a learning exercise of how not to communicate.
@@justayoutuber1906 Or no door 😄
This is probably the most annoyed I've been with the controllers during an incident for a while. How many times are you going to make her say the same thing before you listen? The first thing given was the nature of the emergency and intentions, still asked two more times. Asked passengers and fuel three times AFTER the pilot provided it. Didn't understand they had declared an emergency after stating it at least three times. Handed off to the other controller and they had no idea it was an emergency aircraft. Jesus people, talk to each other.
The proper call from the crew should have been "Mayday Mayday, Mayday!" FIRST. That would have avoided the confusion. Agreed that the ATC wasa little slow on the comprehension.
And it (atc) didn’t relay info to airport,
The issue was saying the same thing wasn't giving all the info.
Women
Pilot did an excellent job not yelling profanities at the incompetent ATC staff.
Exactly! Just listening to this, I was saying to myself anytime now I expect her to say ,I SAID I HAVE A F$#%ING EMERGENCY!! I NEED 10K FEET SO PEOPLE CAN BREATHE NOW !! WHAT PART AREN'T YOU UNDERSTANDING?AND SCREW YOUR D#$N BOX ! 😂 I don't know who can stay that calm when being asked the same questions five times. Hopefully, the investigation comes back that this exchange is a missed opportunity for the ATC. They need to be faster with their comprehension of the situation and reaction.
Agreed. Holy mother of God that was frusterating.
ATCer could have been under a lot of stress and very busy. Would not be uncommon for ATCer to repeat something in a high stress situation, you would do the same thing. Could also have been radio/audio signal distortion and ATCer did not clearly hear what pilot said. There is also a duty manager at the airport so that would be part of any official report after the emergency situation.
@@spartacusyoya If ATC can't stay calm and prioritise a MAYDAY aircraft I believe that have failed.
@@nothanksmate From this audio all members remained calm. Also, it can depend on experience of an ATCer, a less experienced one is not going handle a difficult situation as well as a more experienced one. Plus, radio signals are not always perfect(volume, tone, pitch), statements have to be repeated when this happens.
One thing I would encourage any future (or current) pilots is to use a mayday call for serious emergencies. A mayday call gets attention. Then, you need to be assertive in what you need. It's very difficult because you are dealing with so many issues while remembering to aviate, navigate, and communicate.
Everyone has so much to say after the fact! It is easy to judge everything when there are no consequences. The pilots did an excellent job of determining the risks of landing over weight against the loss of life. I know they get trained for this....but pilots rarely get thanked for their talents when things go very wrong. These pilots did an awesome job! Everyone survived. 10 out of 10!
Nobody is saying anything critical about the pilots.
Who do you think you're defending them against?
They lost their quick reference sheets during the depressurisation and the cockpit door blew open which apparently as intended but once again Boeing forgot to put in the manuals!
You mean Boeing actually has manuals? I thought they made things up as they went along😂
No way will I ever fly on a 737 Max, I'm just amazed there hasn't been more fatal incidents
Overcoming the initial shock, changing the mission goals from "fly to destination" to "land ASAP" within a few minutes, managing the uncertainty of more hidden damage.
Respect 🎩
No Respect - thats their job
@@Cadence-qt2ux yes it's their job. If you keep taking them for granted, and fail to pay respect, they will go somewhere else where they earn the same and are appreciated.
The woman on the flight sounds harried and she probably was, but also you have to realize she was using the oxygen mask at this point. The sound from the mask mic is TERRIBLE, so that's part of the issue.
I had an actual rapid D when flying a DHC-8 one night, and you put on the mask, establish communications, and then you chop and drop. Pull the throttles to idle and get down to 10000 feet. The only thing scary about this situation is that you really do not know what you have, you don't know if the structure of the airplane is broken, so you need to take it easy and not get all wound up.
In my case, one of the outflow valves literally fell off the aft pressure bulkhead (hello?) and we lost the cabin in about 5 seconds at 18,000 feet.
Busy as hell would be my guess...And don't those mask's Inflate/Self tighten when you put them on?
@@JMHTruck32005 You squeeze and they expand. When you release them, they grip your head, kind of like in the movie "Alien".
What is the sensation of pressure loss at 18000?
Sound from the plane was easier to understand than ATC actually…
@@AndreSomers same, her voice is crystal clear compared to the static noisy ATC
I was on on board a small twin turboprop medevac flight several years ago when the door separated at about 10,000 ft. It was a very violent event but immediately afterwards my pilot only asked for a "precautionary landing". We had to fly about 20 minutes back to a suitable airport. I remember at the time being annoyed that he wasn't declaring an emergency. (He did an excellent job flying the aircraft and getting us on the ground so no complaints) I had my hands full trying to calm my patient down. We landed and an FAA inspector found that upon separation, the door came within 1/2 inch of taking out the tail. Leaving deep gouges in the fuselage. Anyway I learned that the real danger can be the damage that happens from the object once it departs the aircraft.
And the amount of FN paperwork that goes with declaring an emergency in flight!
ATC didn't seem to understand what was going on.
Yeah, they didn't know that the panel is missing.
@@YouCanSeeATC But depressurization, emergency and twice "we need to get down and return" could've made it a bit more clear maybe. :)
What's new. 20 questions game when the second call was enough to figure it out.
@@VincentGroenewold I feel like there should be codes for emergncy types. Repeating same information again and again is just not efficient of helpful
@@cturdo It seems that when US controllers hear the word "emergency" they persistently start asking questions that do not help the crew at all...
As long as it hasn't been determined that it will be a rough landing why not focus on directions and communicating internally with the next controller instead of focusing on "souls on board and amount of fuel in (whatever crazy unit today)"?
Wow first ATC really fumbled that
I think ATC did its best considering you could hardly hear the pilot's voice and her voice sounded super distressed... (which I get but you don't want to lose your cool when something happens on your plane at any altitude... ;(
Well done with your prompt publishing of this incident!
👍
@@YouCanSeeATC isn't this audio a reconstruction as stated in your description, meaning fake?
I believe the reconstruction is in reference to the visualization of the flight position not the audio (which would only have been edited to remove unnecessary clips from other aircraft etc) creator can correct me if I’m wrong but that’s my understanding as it’s how most ATC videos work.
It's very hard to criticise the crew, they got it down. I think what is highlighted is the need for the US to standardise to Pan and Mayday calls. 'Declaring an Emergency' can mean absolutely anything in the States now, and it's no wonder that ATC might think it's nothing if they hear it so much. It doesn't help when a flap disagree is the same as a depressurisation.
This is a clear Mayday situation which should switch on the controllers to the severity instantly. In terms of the crew - pure pure speculation here, but it seems (looking at the video) that the crew waited for permission to descend. Given they have Radar and TCAS, Aviate first - start the descent, Navigate - away from terrain, Communicate that this is what you are doing.
It sounds like as soon as the mask was on, the communication started which probably added to the workload of the crew given more questions started following.
IMO the gold star handling of this comm from the crew would be Mayday Mayday Mayday, descending to 10,000, standby for further intentions.
ATC will call if there are other planes in the way, TCAS as an another safety net.
BUT - the crew got it down. Kudos to them.
No...emergency works just fine. No difference in outcome. You EuroBrits are just sore that we jettisoned the silly Mayday Pan Pan silliness.
Not to mention ATC is woefully understaffed at this point - controllers spend their shift task saturated and on mandatory overtime. But no one at the FAA wants to admit that it is leading to a reduction in quality.
How about the rest of the world switches to our way?
@@ridiculousblue9917 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I am also curious why mayday was never called. I thought pan and mayday were standard emergency calls
We’re depressurized.
What’s the nature of your emergency?
We’re depressurized.
When able, what’s the nature of your emergency?
Dont forget....
Pilot:**checks in with approach saying "emergency aircraft"**
ATC: Did you declare an emergency?
🙄
Also, for thr fourth time please say souls and fuel. I might ask a fifth time, we'll see.
The third time they should just answer "The nature of our emergency is spelled Alpha Tango Charlie"
it's because of the following! In aviation, both "Mayday" and "emergency" are used, but they have specific meanings and applications:
Mayday: In aviation, "Mayday" is a distress call used in voice communication, primarily over the radio. It indicates that the aircraft is facing a life-threatening emergency, such as engine failure, fire, or loss of control. The pilot uses the word "Mayday" three times at the start of the transmission to alert air traffic controllers and other nearby aircraft to the severity of the situation. Following the distress call, the pilot provides information about the nature of the emergency, the aircraft's position, altitude, and intentions.
Emergency: In aviation, "emergency" is a broader term and can refer to any situation that requires urgent attention but may not be immediately life-threatening. Emergencies in aviation can include situations like medical emergencies on board, fuel shortage, or a pressurization problem. Pilots may declare an emergency to receive priority handling from air traffic control, but without using the specific "Mayday" distress call. Instead, they might use the term "Pan-Pan," which indicates an urgent situation that is not immediately life-threatening.
The key difference in aviation is the level of urgency and threat to life: "Mayday" is reserved for the most serious, life-threatening emergencies, while "emergency" can cover a broader range of urgent situations that require prompt attention but are not as immediately dire as those warranting a "Mayday" call.
The ATC is asking the right question but the pilot can't think straight to give her a correct answer. Possible that the pilot is unaware o the exact situation but u would think she is... ;(
What happened to "Mayday Mayday Mayday, Aircraft 1282 declaring an emergency, Requesting Immediate reroute and attending ground services. Mayday mayday mayday, Alaska 1282 has experienced rapid decompression, Executing emergency decent to 10,000 feet, awaiting clearance for emergency landing at departure point, Over"... have we cobbled ATC language to the point that we have to "declare an emergency" with 4 separate departments in ATC before getting clearance for a Mayday event?
you can really hear the stress in the pilots voice and they get it handled. well done to the flight crew.
Compared to the Southwest pilot reporting a similar incident caused by an engine fan blade failure; when you listen to her, it seems that she is just describing what she had for dinner the previous evening...
No wonder she is stressed. ATC keeps asking for the nature of emergency and her intentions over and over again!!!
@@wordforever117 - that's because, like 99% of all US pilots, she refused to utilise standard 'Mayday' OP.... First she just shouts "Seattle, we'd like to go down"..... What sort of declaration is that? A simple 'Mayday, mayday, mayday, Alaska 1282 making emergency descent to 10,000" would have it clear that she was an emergency and her intentions! Then whenever she changed frequencies, she should refer to herself as 'Mayday Alaska 1282'... all the confusion in all this through lack of following SOP means that she spends more time 'communicating' through confusion and less time 'aviating'! I've only flown military, but have survived worse by strictly utilising SOP.....
@@paulsinclair3401I agree she should have got the mask on first then declared Mayday, issue and stated intentions.
But it does appear her first transmission is before the mask is on. Could be a shock reaction.
@@paulsinclair3401
I promise I will never say mayday just because it makes youtube commenters' vaginas so sandy.
ATC: but what about is your emergency? Stop flying for a minute, I must know NOW.
ATC. say again the nature of emergency, like 2-3 more times.
ATC: are you reeeeally an emergency?
ATC: ok give me those souls on board, like, few more times also. I’ll make sure to not pass those along to the next controller.
You just wrote the script for the next airplane movie.
I think the ATC was expecting the pilot to drop everything and go back and see what happened...
it's because of the following! In aviation, both "Mayday" and "emergency" are used, but they have specific meanings and applications:
Mayday: In aviation, "Mayday" is a distress call used in voice communication, primarily over the radio. It indicates that the aircraft is facing a life-threatening emergency, such as engine failure, fire, or loss of control. The pilot uses the word "Mayday" three times at the start of the transmission to alert air traffic controllers and other nearby aircraft to the severity of the situation. Following the distress call, the pilot provides information about the nature of the emergency, the aircraft's position, altitude, and intentions.
Emergency: In aviation, "emergency" is a broader term and can refer to any situation that requires urgent attention but may not be immediately life-threatening. Emergencies in aviation can include situations like medical emergencies on board, fuel shortage, or a pressurization problem. Pilots may declare an emergency to receive priority handling from air traffic control, but without using the specific "Mayday" distress call. Instead, they might use the term "Pan-Pan," which indicates an urgent situation that is not immediately life-threatening.
The key difference in aviation is the level of urgency and threat to life: "Mayday" is reserved for the most serious, life-threatening emergencies, while "emergency" can cover a broader range of urgent situations that require prompt attention but are not as immediately dire as those warranting a "Mayday" call.
@@RLTtizME😂
@@RLTtizMEATC: Your choices were either Steak, or Fish
Pilot: Yeah, I had the Lasagna.
I feel there is a good amount of sexism in these comments. If a male voice said the exact same things in the exact same way, they would be no "he was screaming" comments.
Yeah the sad insecure men always appear any time a female is involved in an incident. I sincerely hope they don’t have daughters, sisters, wives, or mothers that they talk to like this
Nah I don't buy that. I've heard panicked male pilots too (watched a LOT of these videos) and they didn't panic as bad. Nothing to do with her being a woman, probably she just had low flight hours. Captain was flying the plane, not her. If you want to see the opposite you only need to look to ex fighter pilot Tammy Jo Shults handle it like the boss she is. And in her case not only was a passenger almost sucked out and killed they lost an engine too. This lady still did 9000% better than the general public would do (male or female) in that situ and she got on top of her fright after a moment or two. She'll be a better pilot for the experience.
Pilot: "we need 10 minutes to sort thing."
Passenger by door: "land this plane already"
YA GOT 10 SECONDS
Door’s open….help yourself!😂
ATC: yaayyyhh... I'm going to give you delay vectors and box you in that way AND give the passengers by the hole a good 360deg unobstructed view of downtown Portland...By the way, do you want to burn extra fuel? What do you mean by I don't understand what the situation is and what I'm being told?
@@boudibla4011He did not know the situation. All he knew is that it is a depressurization incident. Normally, when it is only a very small leak, there is lots of time to prepare for a safe landing at that altitude.
I don't know a solution, but if you saw the video, you know that the ATC could not have known that there is a large hole in the side of the plane. That information was never conveyed. The crew was also very occupied of course, they had to fly the plane with the cockpit door wide open. There is no fault here - but the fact is, that there was an information discrepancy. The ATC did not know the severity of the event. Normal depressurization events are very different, without time pressure to land immediately.
That question is an example of the ATC caring about doing a safe landing, rather than him wanting to annoy them. With the information he had, he tried the best he could do. What do you think is the reason he asked the question? Because he wanted to make sure, that the people get on the ground as safely as possible. And with the mental picture of it being a normal depressurization event, that makes a lot of sense.
Yet again the quality of ATC during an emergency leaves a lot to be desired.
You could tell from the pilot that she was growing increasingly and rightly annoyed having to repeat what the emergency was and the fuel and souls onboard.
This keeps happening and needs addressing in the US.
You have some trivial priorities.
That’s cause ATC in the US is now subject to diversity hires instead of people actually qualified for the job
The ability of an ATC to listen, grasp, retain, and process information quickly and accurately is not trivial.
@@RLTtizME Like what?
Those things are trivial to automate. Have been for decades.
Yeah, hearing her need to repeat herself I was like WTF lol
Calm careful.pilot..thank you all for saving all aboard❤
What is the controller doing?! If I tell you I’ve lost pressurization, declare an emergency, and need to return to Portland you need to start sending me to Portland. Not flying me farther from where I need to land. Then there’s no communication between the controllers on why the jet is returning and that it’s an emergency?
Lots going on they neded to get a lot lower to land, all in all I think everyone performed well.Now Boeing and NTSB need to find out what happened.
That is what killed everyone on flt592
This is the new Gen Z generation in ATC.. maybe I'm wrong but Approach sounds very young. It will only get worse..
@@user-tk3fq9md6i That's what the WW2 generation said about you.
@@chrischarla424Yep. It takes time to learn and lots and lots of practice. A lot of people don't put in the time to really practice responding to emergencies.
This has to be some of the WORST ATC ever. Even though the pilot was wearing her oxygen mask, she still clearly states that they have an emergency, what the emergency is (depresserized) and that they need lower altitude. And yet ATC makes her repeat everything multiple times when they very clearly have their hands extremely full. For God sakes, pull your head out and pay attention.
No she screamed we are going
to go down!! So now the ATC is wondering is it a hi Jack or wtf is going on? Took her like 15 more seconds to say it’s an emergency……that’s a long time in aviation to reply to ATC
@@tritontransport
such a low probability of a hijacking post 9/11, especially now 23 years later and especially in the US. The biggest risk has become the flight crew which are the only ones with access. Like the Germanwings incident
@tritontransport Well, first of all, it is Aviate, Navigate, Communicate...... IN THAT ORDER. So, after the side of the airplane BLEW OUT, and after having to put on her oxygen mask so that she was able to continue to aviate and navigate, they're lucky she even gave them the courtesy of communicating as quickly as she did. As I said, both pilots had their hands full trying to figure out why their plane just exploded and whether they'd have a plane to aviate long enough to get back on the ground still in some semblance of one piece. They also have a ton of checklist to start going through before they land. Third, what I understood her to say was that "We need to go down followed by we've had a decompression." Since she was CLEARLY in an oxygen mask, any ATC even halfway paying attention should have been able to add 2+2 and come up with 4 like I and the vast majority of the rest of the viewers of this video did. She then went on to repeat that info several more times, even adding that they were an emergency aircraft because he wasn't getting it. I heard her each time without issue and it's safe to say I've had far less training than this controller has, so if I understood it the first time, he certainly should have caught on by the third or fourth time and she certainly should not of had to go all through it all over again when she was handed off to the next controller. She even gave them souls on board and fuel before they even asked for it since she knew that would be one of the first things they'd want to know. I would imagine that she did that, not only to make it easier for ATC, but also in an attempt I would guess, to get them to leave the flight crew alone so they could work the issue. But once again, ATC was asleep and she had to repeat that as well.
Having said all that, I understand that ATC as a whole is overworked and understaffed and I wouldn't wish their stress level on anyone, so I usually give them a wide berth. But in my opinion, they dropped the ball on this one.
@@tritontransport
So why are hijackings a hairs thickness from being zilch if the security is all for show?
Because it isn't. those cockpit doors do not open for anything other than a bomb (that will open more than the door while at it) or really heavy tools pertinent to firefighters or something I'll assume. Not like you're would sneak that past the check-in playing it off as hand luggage.
The curve on hijackings dropped like stock market crash after 9/11. Terrorists didn't develop a mass fear of flying all of sudden
She did at that start but she also clarified four times that there was an emergency depressurization and she was returning to Portland. I am confused why you are ignoring that part of the interaction where ATC clearly dropped the ball? Is there a reason for your oversight?@@tritontransport
Best thing about that seat is your neighbor can't pull the shade down as you want to look outside
🤣
Thankfully nobody was in those seats as they certainly would
Have died…… Boeing fails yet again
Lol
@@MrHav1kas long as a passenger would have had their seatbelt on they would have been just fine. The seat never left the aircraft
Thank You so much for this! Well done as always. The new stations should ask you for your content.
Wow! That pilot on the radio (PM) started her day climbing into the aircraft likely looking like Cheryl Ladd and climbed back out looking like George Burns!
She did a damn good job for someone who sounds like in the early stage of her career!
You go girl!💕
👍
MCP
I too thought she was a low-time pilot. Saying yes to "the equipment" usually means firetrucks and foaming the runway for a belly landing. She might have known that the damage did not affect the landing gear or fuel tank integrity-- and she might not have been sure so let's give her the benefit of erring on the side of safety.
@@peteinwisconsin2496 She should have gone back with a tape measure to accurately report the size of the hole to ATC. Pilot error.
😂
Cheryl ladd c'est la fille de l'acteur Alan ladd ?
Gotta admit that that's a good window seat
🤣
I'm a skydiver, so as long as I didn't get blown overboard during the decompression, I woupd have felt right at home inches from an open door at 12,000 feet.
And all the fresh air! Wonderful! Brst view! 😅
Lots of leg room.
Alaska is now offering discounted window seats.
😮 The pilot did well . Put yourself in that situation .
I would bet she's got some milspec training, based on her comms.
Center: Alaska 1282 when able say all States in reverse alphabetical order, skipping every 5th State.
Centre: Alaska 1282 now do the Macarena at the same time.
That pilot was getting the plane down regardless of how high they were without circling. Even if they were at 20,000 just a few miles from the airport she would have been like naw I got this. I can see the airport and I’m on short final 😂😂😂 uhh ya we’re stabilized decending at 10,000 ft/min
ATC: "Please stand by"
Pilot: "Thank you, cleared to land on 28L"
ATC: "No! Stand by for instructions!"
Pilot: "Thank you, cleared to land on 28L"
4 rules of aviation: 1) Sound cool on the radios, 2) Aviate, 3) Navigate, and 4) Communicate.
i suppose you know all about emergencies in the air when flying a real plane ???
I've heard MANY other emergency situations with calmer sounding pilots. Actually this was the first I've heard so far where one was not calm sounding. Sully still for the win, and even WN 1380
@@ebaystars He’s actually completely correct, obviously the 1st rule is just a tad of good humor.
@@ANT18621 humor has no place in safety related issues sorry, my ancestral relative Joey Grimaldi was very serious about making others laugh....the oxy pressure mask has its inherent problems in audio, we used to use "words twice" when comms were bad or unclear
@@ebaystars It’s a comment section on you tube dude, it’s not a safety course meeting, and if a pilot or potential pilot can’t differentiate the difference, he has no business operating an aircraft. Lighten up dude.
How many times does the pilot have to declare an emergency ? Holy sheesh 😮.
Protocol states 23 times.
You made me laugh! Have you thought of doing stand up?@@RLTtizME
she needed to declare Mayday
She's a woman, they gotta make sure
@@ezragonzalez8936 Nope. Plane flyable, all systems still working. No fire. No mayday.
"but are you SURE you don't want to be Boxed around????"
That is a DOOR that was covered Over, it didnt just lose a panel or a window, It lost a door with a window that had been covered up. The 737 is not a Plane I would ever fly on thanks. The Pilot was OUTSTANDING, the crew was fantastic
Not faulting the pilots or controllers, however the US phraseology needs a serious rework for emergency aircraft. So many times the pilots had to confirm to ATC that they were an emergency aircraft wasting transmission time and the pilots time. The rest of the world uses "MAYDAY-MAYDAY-MAYDAY" for a reason, it's a direct instruction to ATC that the aircraft has a serious issue and needs number 1 priority, no ambiguity. All this "we are declaring an emergency" "Are you an emergency or just coming back" "YES WE ARE AN EMERGENCY" will kill people sooner rather than later.
Concur - a depressurization should be an immediate MAYDAY with no floundering around. Must assume the plane lost structural integrity and at those speeds a "hole" can become bigger very quickly. They got it back on the ground and thankfully nobody was hurt but it highlights areas that could be improved. I have NEVER understood how/why the current controller cannot keep the aircraft, switch the frequency with them or simply patch them in, and pass them off to tower control with clear description of what is happening. I am sympathetic to the controllers because they have a lot on their plate but seems like a simple fix to take workload/stress off the pilot and give them more ability to remain focused on what is most important.
Americans prefer, "We're coming in HOT!! Make way!"
I know, MAYDAY etc is pretty clear...this new staff don't know the half of it... gee...scary to fly in the first place, who needs to know that they are hiring people who don't know how to communicate ...Communication is everything.
@@christophersmith5303and God knows what the flying piece of fuselage strikes either.
LOL Portland has a point called HPSTER? Brilliant!
Very good turnaround, Thanks!
And the airlines want to go to single piloted aircraft? Thankfully there were 2 pilots on this aircraft. One pilot would have been overwhelmed and this would not have ended well.
Couldn't agree with this more. A single piloted aircraft in that situation is asking too much.
yeah that idea is some incredibly stupid bureaucratic induced low level manager bs trying to produce artificially positive results to further a career they shouldn't be in
I will never fly with an airline that uses only one pilot.
And the general public still think ATC is the ‘most’ stressful job you can get…. Well done to the phenomenal pilots in a job well done.
“Emergency and need to descend”
ATC “You want an ice cream with sprinkles?”
That’s basically what we heard here. A totally unprofessional ATC the whole lot of them. It just amazes me to what training or empathy some ATC have these days.
Curious are you a pilot? or ATC? I'm surely not, but have heard enough of these to think they did okay. It seemed a bit odd that as they hand off one to another that the downstream atc didn't already know it was an emergency aircraft. perhaps all happens so fast.
ATC = DEI
What part of " we are de-pressurized" is ATC not getting. Controllers dropped the ball big time on this. The tape should be pulled and used as a training tool. Kudos to the pilot for keeping that plane wings level & flying. Now Boeing, can you fix those damn 737s please?
ATC discrepancies aside, it's really lucky that nobody was sitting next to the section that broke off, and lucky that they weren't already at cruise altitude and speed. The First Officer seemed to be fairly new but she handled it well, especially her understandable frustration with ATC in the heat of the moment. I'll be following this one to learn exactly what happened. The last time a piece of fuselage came off during a flight was Aloha Flight 243 in 1988 when a large section of fuselage blew off the top.
In aviation, both "Mayday" and "emergency" are used, but they have specific meanings and applications:
Mayday: In aviation, "Mayday" is a distress call used in voice communication, primarily over the radio. It indicates that the aircraft is facing a life-threatening emergency, such as engine failure, fire, or loss of control. The pilot uses the word "Mayday" three times at the start of the transmission to alert air traffic controllers and other nearby aircraft to the severity of the situation. Following the distress call, the pilot provides information about the nature of the emergency, the aircraft's position, altitude, and intentions.
Emergency: In aviation, "emergency" is a broader term and can refer to any situation that requires urgent attention but may not be immediately life-threatening. Emergencies in aviation can include situations like medical emergencies on board, fuel shortage, or a pressurization problem. Pilots may declare an emergency to receive priority handling from air traffic control, but without using the specific "Mayday" distress call. Instead, they might use the term "Pan-Pan," which indicates an urgent situation that is not immediately life-threatening.
The key difference in aviation is the level of urgency and threat to life: "Mayday" is reserved for the most serious, life-threatening emergencies, while "emergency" can cover a broader range of urgent situations that require prompt attention but are not as immediately dire as those warranting a "Mayday" call.
Thank you for this explanation.
@@ezragonzalez8936 And of course we have PANPAN for those less serious emergencies that still warrant attention and is very clear, or should be to ATC professionals. Its a lot more difficult to mishear PANPAN and MAYDAY than emergency.
I'm wondering if Boeing failing to install bolts on the door plug with no records about it either, was on your bingo card.
As a retired ATC I can say these controllers handling this situation are sub-par, at best. And I have earned the right to say that having been fully certified in an FAA enroute center and an approach control both. I’m truly embarrassed and ashamed listening to this playback. Horrible communication/coordination skills and no new clearance limit issued to this flight. How many times did the Alaska pilot state the words “declare emergency” and “depressurized”??? 4x? 5x? At the very minimum your first words as an ATC are “Cleared to the PDX airport via radar vectors…”. Then you’re covered in the event something catastrophic happens prior to landing. I don’t feel safe flying in 2024 with this young, inclusive, inexperienced crop of ATCs lacking the necessary critical thinking skills to perform their job in a safe, orderly, and expeditious manner
I couldn’t agree more
Curious, could you explain how the word 'inclusive' is meant here? Millennial? Female? Martian? (ok, the last is sarcastic, but I truly am curious.)
Maybe ATC need to watch yhe first AIRPORT movie!
Amazing job by the captain and crew 👌🏼❤️
I give credit to Alaska. Flew out of PDX with them and they did a thorough check of the 737-900 to catch a crack in the cargo bulkhead for animal safety. Good crew and airline.
The Pilots was understandably and rightly so a little stressed at the beginning but as she realized Airplane was under control and passengers were OK, she also got hold of her nerves and begin to sound more confident. The flight attendants also played a key part in relaying the information about passenger safety, as well as Airplane's movements and controls not jerking, or shaking, and responding to Pilots input correctly, made the difference, and boosting moral and confidence of the pilot, otherwise, ATC was clueless, as to what was really going on with the Airplane as well as the Pilot and crew's situation.
yup....I wouldn't want to fly with that pilot...( granted, she landed the plane..) she sort of lost her cool there and couldn't come up with the proper answer the ATC was asking her. ;(
@@sunflower-oo1ffThe cockpit door violently blew open. The co-pilot's headset blew off. Who knows what else was blowing around the cockpit. In the passenger section, seat backs and headrests blew off in the sudden de-pressureization. Clothing and personal effects blew everywhere. It was a sudden, violent incident. I think she handled it well.
Thank god everyone is safe
Thank you very much for picking this Accident up! Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 will become a famous Flight Number. Fortunately everybody survived - the single positive part of this Story!
Now I believe the whistleblowers said about the poor quality of Boeing planes.
Sad to see Boeing go from having a stellar reputation in decades past to having doors blow off on brand new aircraft.
It's like that pretty much in every industry... but flying SHOULD be safe...too many people with no accountability, no pride in their work... no quality material used..and the list goes on.... but...we got AI now...we should be fine 😂
I had huge respect for Boeing in the past, and as a European found them far more comforting to fly in than anything Airbus made but that reputation seems to have gone down the drain now.
Wow great video amazing editing and collecting this information. Only suggestion i have would be adding local time in the top right corner if possible.
Excellent job by pilots and crew.
These controllers need to go back to training or something. I mean it's like they were not even listening to this pilot. Great job to the Alaska crew.
The pilot had to repeat the same information. She reported at least three times fuel and souls on board and had to verify that the airplane was in an emergency. I’m not a pilot or anything but when trying to aviate an emergency airplane, repeating yourself to ATC is not something a pilot wants at a time like this.
That pilot lady! A true angel handling this emergency! Respect!
I live in Hillsboro Oregon and was driving westbound on Cornell Road near Tanasbourne Town Center at around 6pm Friday night (1/5/24) and for some reason all lanes of Cornell Road were blocked at Amberglen Parkway. I found out that this area was below the flight path of this flight at the time this occurred. I wonder if debris fell from the plane and landed in the area. I could not see any emergency vehicles other than a city truck with yellow beacons blocking the street. It took me 10-15 minutes to get from Cornell to Evergreen (a distance of about 1/4 mile).
This is an excellent post of timely information. Just one note: If you can include an on-screen time stamp so viewers can see, for example, time of depressurization at 16,500 and time when 10,000 (safe breathing) was reached, that would be very informative. I hope you can either add time information here or do it for future videos. Great work, and thanks.
👍
It looks like something like that is in the description under the video??
@@msjdb723 Thanks. I'm not sure. If the video is continuous and uncut, then these timestamps match the real-time events, and the only item missing is the life-critical moment when the plane reached 10,000 feet and people could breathe without masks. But the intro says some things are cut out, and doesn't say that the audio is kept real-time.
In any case, the pilots did a brilliant job descending quickly and being ready to land quickly and safely.
There is a reason why FAA and EASA airworthiness certifications exist. You have to prove there is 1 in a billion chance for accident. Yes, this happened, but plane didn’t fall apart, it landed safely with a hole on the side and no one is hurt. That’s the most important part. They will analyze and fixed the issue.
No damage to the door frame, the door was not latched
The 737 max should never have been considered airworthy ever again after the last two disasters
Nice job on the video.
ATC not expecting the unexpected....good grief, someone should have declared emergency for them!
7000 crossing HPSTR ... I'm surprised they continued the approach and didn't circle once to shed altitude. That's 7.5 NM from the FAF which is at 2000, so they needed about double normal descent rate for those 7 miles AND to slow down.
They were going down really fast
I suppose, when you think your plane is going to fall apart, you kinda want to get on the ground quickly! In addition the pilots never let the cockpit, so they never saw the hole, and don’t know how big it was, or if it was getting worse.
Did you cross check that with actually flying your BarcaLounger to simulate that protocol?
I bet they didn’t worry too much about the speed as those are long runways.
I guess so, especially since they had a tail wind , 160 at 11.@@derekl9702
Wow the composure of the lady pilot.
thanks from Thailand putting the ATC + overlay on
Hats off to the pilots for handling this situation like true pros
Sound like bad coms & panic to me. Bit of a sh!t show.
This sounded pretty terrifying 🙏 I'm glad everything went well
P.S. I sent a message on the Facebook page with a tip, but I don't know where to find ATC communications unfortunately so I don't know if it's of any help
I didn't even know you could do, and I do follow this channel on Facebook and X. I'll keep an eye out next time.
@@msjdb723 I saw the text at the end of the video for sending in tips
Are 911 operators and ATC trained by the same people? Asking useless questions, repeating the same questions over and over, minimizing emergency situations, transferring calls without passing along pertinent information....
In a emergency let’s make sure to have the pilots repeat the same shit 10 times . Holy fuck
Stop blaming the ATC. The pilots stated that they were "depressurized" and "need to go down". At 16000 ft this is not catastrophic by itself. The pilots never mentioned that the nature of the emergency was that a door blew off, and this information at some point should have been relayed to the pilots from the flight attendants. No matter what, an emergency is an emergency but in that context, the right information to the ATC would have made a difference in helping them understand what was happening. In any event, fortunately, the plane landed and everyone was OK.
Pilots were a bit rattled in this case, glad they got it together.
And there you were...calmly passing gas into your sofa as the even unfolded.
Fool
Yea that wasn't it. They weren't rattled, they were flying the plane. Aviat, Navigate, & Communicate
@@mgoo1713 Expectorate if you have time.
That was a very busy cockpit...Not knowing what was going on, was there any further damage caused by the door blowing out,they just didn't know...
Great job by the pilot. ATC needs to clean out their ears though.
Calling it a “section of fuselage” is an exaggeration which makes it sound worse than it is. A plug filling an unused emergency exit doorway came out. The structure of the fuselage was not affected.
Impressive response
Kudos to the pilots 👏
She really didnt seem that prepared for this emergency… only thing she should have told the controller was mayday + need return and need to decend to level…
Also there seems to be no communication that they dont know the reason for the issue
Fuel 188 and 189 🤔
@@Jonas-vi1slexactly
@@Jonas-vi1sl she said depressurized multiple times. By the second time the ATC should know what happened if she missed the first “scream. “ pilot obviously didn’t prepare for this, but who would guess a brand new plane on a calm day just randomly blow a hole in the middle?
I understand the pilots being distracted... but the ATC seemed high as balls. Like.... wut was ur emergency or something? WE DEPRESSURIZED! (takes bong hit) what? WE NEED TO DESCEND BECAUSE OF DEPRESSURIZATION! oh.... can we like box you or whatever, man?
Totally
Gurgles water…we have 18900 gallons…
Hold please…I need to change the bong water 💦 sorry what was your emergency again?
Damn it bro. That ATC looked like new pilots on Vatsim that can't memorize the assigned squawk code...
I literally told my sister who was flying to LA from London yesterday, not to fly with any American owned airlines,after watching Downfall-The case agains Boeing on Netflix.They don't care anymore, it's all about profits.
CONGRATULATIONS, MY GOSH, NERVES OF STEEL!
After listening carefully I can feel the initial panic (of course), then quickly calming down.
THESE ARE WELL DONE
Good job P.I.C. !
Credit to the pilots. Great Job.thank you!
What is it with the tower? How often are they going to ask if they declared an emergcy?
She did great 🙏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
As of now a lot of MAX 9’s are currently grounded and flights are canceled due to the issues which includes United, Alaska, Aeromexico, and a few other airlines. Some airlines did not have the same issue with their MAX 9’s so they are currently active.
Wow!!! Well done to all staff, crew, pilots and air traffic controllers!!! 😢💜😱💜
Seat belts save lives... Alway, always wear your seat belt when in an aircraft...
Could you give us a demonstration?
-The safety video shows me eating the seat belt with a pack of crayons-
We were siting in the waiting area at ONT when this occurred. We could something was up, but didn’t know this happened.
Seems like the ATC was not paying attention to the pilots words.
It wasn’t a “section of the fuselage”, it was a Plug type door that departed the aircraft. This particular door is unused in AS’s configuration due to not being required by the amount of seats the MAX9 is configured with at AS. The door is visible from the outside but only has the Window on the inside visible with the rest covered by a sidewall panel.
It's not a plug door. It is a plugged door. All other 737 doors are plug doors. The newest added 5th door is an outward opening door.
The NTSB has put out a reward for finding the door plug, which should be somewhere in the Lake Oswego area. They need to figure out what happened. Those with the door activated don’t have this problem.
Boeing is LUCKY nobody was sitting in those seatsvvv as they would have certainly died. Yet another black mark on the record of this plane.
Respect to stujardess and other workers in plane who acting very professional!❤
I will always fly Alaska Airlines. Heading down south or anywhere up here in Alaska.