Bro I freaking grew up playing Seek & Destroy on my PS2 back in like 2006! Holy crap, never did I think it would be relevant again or even hear about it again but damn, here we are!
That's mostly the turret, if they leave the hull values as the same as the 2a4 like they did with the 2PL the shown hull protection is more or less final.
@@kingtiger6155 It does not, it has addon armor similar to the PSO, which adds to the sides and the driver's hatch slope area, but not the UFP and LFP.
Why can't USA get the LAV-25 with an autocannon for higher tiers instead of just having the LAV-AD with it's useless minigun? RU gets all kinds of IFVs with nice cannons and now other nations too while USA still only has the Bradley and limited LAV-AD
The PGZ209 got AHEAD rounds and the AHEAD rounds seem to explode based on IRST distance now. They're inconsistent with a small sphere of damage but so much better than before. Also the M1128's canon breech has changed.
@@konst915 It's the same round as the PGZ209 one. It's working but inconsistent due to dev server. Also I feel they did this as the 10.0 9035 CV90 will have AHEAD (probably).
im excited for the Desert Warrior hopes it gets thermals and also it can actually fire its missiles on the move (atleast on dev server) and thats a big deal for me
The biggest winner for me is Italy with the first working Top tier MBT as the Leopard 2A7. However still a useless SPAA in the Lineup. BUT STILL, THANK YOU!!! And also Sweden! The Gripen JAS39C with SAPHE will get the job done and replace the useless Gripen JAS39A with nerfed GBU dropping speed...
Giving the war thunder F-15C FAST packs is hilarious... basically "here's a ton of extra fuel and drag, which you'll never use on our tiny maps". Even the sim maps are tiny as hell. Don't need the 23k lb with bags, let alone the 30k lb with FAST.
I was thinking the same thing. I work on f15 fuel tanks and I just don’t get why anyone would ever want them. Our pilots don’t even want them. They are super heavy and though they don’t look like it add a ton of drag.
Maybe the Benelux ground tree will come next update (Which should be in mid-late August or early September)? Along with the low tier Hungarian aircraft too?
I f*cking hope so, I seriously want the M39 Pantserwagen, the T-15, the T-13, the TOW launcher version of the YP-408, and the Vickers Carden-Lloyd tankette armed with 47mm M1931 AT gun. Plus the Heja, the Me-210, the RMI-1 X/H, and the WM-21 Solyom.
For the CV9035DK, both the APDS and the API are used in the Gepard. Same DM13 and DM23. So yeah, the DM13 is capable of magnificent post pen damage. This thing will shred everything's sides. The Gepard can get through T-series flanks by shooting the lower side of the hull ( about 40mm thick ) and the DM13 just destroy everything inside. The APDS is good but lacks post pen damage and will definitely not feel that good on flanks. But being capable of piercing breech is good
Be realistic, nothing really changed the Abrams with this update. If the new hydro pump is vehicle breaking for you, then the vehicle isn't the issue 💀
With the addition of a module for autoloaders, they should make it to where it doesn’t completely stop you from loading, but significantly slow you down. As in a real life scenario in case of loader failure the gun can be manually loaded, but it drops RoF significantly. Down to about two rounds per minute. You’d still be at a disadvantage but at least not completely helpless. As for the Abrams it needs some significant love. That turret ring is to big a weakness to be making the tank even weaker.
I think since they added damageable autoloaders, it seems only fair that they should add a variable reload rate for manual breach loaded tanks, depending on how fast the tank is moving and how bumpy the terrain is (perhaps partly mitigated by crew skill).
@@toma3025 not gonna lie that would be a cool addition in my book. At a stand still maximum output and slows down the faster you’re moving. I like the way you think.
The Bernau was a Post-WW2 ship built for the Volksmarine (People's Navy), whose belligerent was the DDR (GDR). It was built around the early 1960s as to fight against any Western Aggression through low-flying aircraft such as helicopters. It was still in service as East Germany fell but was scrapped as it was too fragile to be made into a supposed museum ship. But the plans were kept in the Bundesarchiv (Federal Archive) so that's were Gajin got this ship's weaponry and performancy accurately.
The T80s probably didn't get an autoloader modelled yet because they use a different autoloader from the T72s and T90s which has yet to be completed, just a guess though.
One thing the devs forgot to mention when talking about the ui is if you look at the stats of said vehicle, where it shows the br, for air it will show both its grb and arb brs.
Some things id like to mention The type 10/TKX also has the autoloader modelled 2S38 and PUMA have a ton of new modules Gaijin once again fucked up the names of not one, but both new Israeli vehicles. Improved Baz should be the "F-15C Akef" and the Namer 30 is actually called the Bamer RCWS, and is a prototype, which is funny that we get it TT, when there is an actual production version with a full turret and trophy APS Also, the Namer is not the first light tank in the Israel tree. There is the AMX 13 and AML 90 Btw Namer is pronounced Nuh-mur as against name-r Also the Derby missile is not just an aim 120, it's a modification of the Python 4 More thing a to Meriton are that the A6E tram has a new type of GBU, you might want to check that out. Also, the GBUs used by the new Brazilian AMX, are Israeli made interestingly enough. Btw the Bison uses R-77 irl, so odd it didn't get them now. Also last thing, extremely happy to have the Namer, but the fact that it still has the merkava mk4's botched armour is sad. So many incredible bug reports on the Merkavas missing SLERA armour have been ignored by gaijin. Oh well, the namer being famously the most armoured APC/IFV in the world doesn't matter to gaijin Thanks for reading my rant
9:46 Desert Warrior the Kuwait Army Version of the Warrior , I've been waiting for this for long time , finally I can see something from my beloved country Kuwait 😍 I saw it in real life many times , its so cool.
the dm13 from the cv9035dk, is the same round as on the 35mm SPAA platforms (gepard,chieftain marksman, etc.) including the sabot being the dm23 for the apds belts on the SPAA platforms
😛😋😜😝 Just seeing this paint-scheme makes me laugh. I was the crew chief on this very F-15C while I was deployed to Operation Southern Watch in the winter of 93-94 when we were deployed to SW Asia for Desert Storm. It was an aircraft in "Red-section" (60th FS) and I deployed with the "Blue-section" (58th FS) and this jet was 'my jet' while we were out there. Back then it had an EG on the tail for Eglin AFB.
They can still add the terminator, the British Ajax which is now in service the boxer which is another British vehicle, the striker, the M10 booker, ZBD05/ZTD05. Latest version of the Bradley. Kurganets ect.
You missed the other aditions for the brits, Sea Harrier FA 2 at 12.3 also with the aim120B, the JAS39C gets the R-darter, currently higher G than the Aim120
It’s just not up to par and that’s a fact. It can perform well but it’s just not as good as other available options from other nations. The Milan is very very good, it’s easy to aim has decent damage is relatively fast and generally is very competitive with all other ATGMS at the BR (outside of some strange examples on ATGM carriers that are super crazy) however the gun is just not it at all the pen is nice but the super low fire rate, combined with the reload and the lack of stabilization just make it frustrating at best the Bradly does everything you do but with double the ATGMs triple the fire rate and a dual axis stabilizer same with the BMP-2. The closest competitor is the marder from Germany but the marder has much better gun targeting speed and the fire rate lets it chew up light vehicles and MBT modules faster although at the cost of being able to actually pen MBT armor
@@Grebogoborp the warrior has a better reverse speed, it gets gen 2 thermals and it has the best penning rounds. I don't mind the fire rate since most of my kills are in 1-2 shots.
@@marcohorodnichev9489 the stab and single ATGM are the biggest issues I have played all nations except china through 10.3 and have all of the IFVs in the game including event vehicles from every nation except china and IFVs are my favorite vehicle class and even with all that I still cannot stand the warrior it’s just too frustrating to be at that BR with no stabilizer and a fire rate that low
I was hoping for a new French ground premium to bridge the gap between ranks 7 and 8. Currently there is no premium vehicle that can effectively grind rank 8.
So, I wasn't the only one to play Seek and Destroy as a child lol. People don't know, but that game was hard as hell for a kid to play! Some of those levels were incredibly challenging!
Hey, Justin. Desert Warrior isn't finished on the dev. It'll get a few more modelling done (Spall Liners!) and it'll get gen 3 (I think) thermals. Maybe a few more missiles if we can find the evidence for them as well.
You missed the thrust vectoring fox 3 missiles on the mirage 2000. And it gets 8 missiles now, they unlocked the rest of the hardpoints. You could potentially take a lot of ordinance for both ground and air.
If more aircraft are added to the Benelux sub tree in the future, here are a few that I wish to see. For the Netherlands, we have: The Fokker T.V, the T.VIII, the T.IX, the D.XXIII, theA-17 Nomad, the P-40D, the Dornier Do 24, the Sea Fury, the H-19, the H--34, the UH-1 Huey, the Barracuda, the F-84G, and the F-86D. For Belgium, we have: The Hawker Hurricane, the Fairey Battle, the Typhoon, the Alouette II, the Phantom FGR.2, the Harrier GR.5, the Tornado GR.1, the F-15C, and the Alpha Jet.
Well here's my list for if we ever get a Benelux ground tree. For the Netherlands, we have: The M39 Pantserwagen, the Pantserwagen M-36 & M-38 (Landsverk L-181 & L-180 in Dutch service respectively), the Leopard 2A6, the YPR-765, the Panzerhaubitze 2000 (When Germany gets it too), the Fennek (An AA variant is armed with 4 Stinger missiles), the AMX-VCI (The VTT variant armed with a TOW launcher), the YP-408 (A variant was armed with a TOW launcher), and the AMX-13. For Belgium, we have: The T-13 TD, the T-15 light tank, the AMC 35, the SA F.R.C. 47 mm (A Carden Loyd tankette armed with a 47 mm Model 1931 anti-tank gun), the EBRC Jaguar, the Sherman Firefly, the M113 (A variant armed with MILAN ATGM), the M4A3 105, the M24 Chaffee, the M26 Pershing, the M46 & M47 Patton, the Leopard 1, the M22 Locust, the AIFV (What the YPR-765 originated from), the M41 Walker Bulldog, the M109, the M44, the JPz 4-5, and the SIBMAS (Engineered off of the Ratel prototype and is armed with the 90mm Cockerill Mk.III gun, variants include one armed with the 30mm RARDEN cannon and one which had a bank of either HOT or MILAN ATGMs).
the Leopard 2A4M also fires DM53 and DM53A1, armour of the 2A4M seems to be very unfinished tho. The F-4F which we already have in the TT should already have 9L's (which it fired IRL, not the 9E nor 9J). The F-4F ICE should tbh get AIM-9L/i or 9L/i-1 because those are technically 9L's upgraded to be 9M's. IRIS-T was also fired from the F-4F ICE but only from the test squadron. AIM-9L/i or 9L/i-1 should be sufficient imho
Justin pulls one of my favorite tank games as a kid, beat it several times. I know it's not his forte but it would be cool if we could stream that game for April fools at least once
6:33 i guess KWS stands for "Kampfwertsteigerung" what literely means Combat value increase. So it schould have the same meaning like ICE, the "Improoved Combat Efficiency". But i have no clue what the LV stands for... 6:40 And the BR for it is 12.7, just for Ground Battles its 11.7. Many people really have get to used to the new different BRs on one vehicle...
I wish gaijin would not disable us from shooting when the barrel is destroyed, like nothing is stoping it from shooting. Just significantly reduce the velocity and penetration of the shell fired and even make the trajectory of the fired shell go random places. This would help when someone breaks our barrel and still have a fighting chance to break their barrel or tracks so you can escape.
Well your barrel can be destroyed and you can still shoot, but your shots are highly inaccurate and penertration is far worse (might orange a track) (broken barrel has 2 states, 1 you can't shoot at all, and 1 with what is mentioned)
Yep. Been killed plenty of times when in an IFV, by tanks whose barrels I thought I'd broken, only to realise that I only partially (orange/red shading) damaged them.
The namer having only 2 spikes and being at 10.3 is such a gaijin thing the only thing at 10.3 is the the imp chapparal... give it some more missiles or make it the namer with the trophy APS system on it and up the br to 11-11.3 so it has a lineup
the 16km lock range on the aim120A is beacuse it is an ACTIVE homing missile. meaniing at 16KM the radar onboard the missile goes 'PITBULL' and no longer needs guidance from the aircraft its launched from.
Happy for the Desert Warrior and the Namer but the only thing that matters is the 2A7HU, other than that we also got some cool features but very meh patch overall.
Vextra has -wrong gun (hence wrong ammo) maybe we will get thehistorical OFL 105 G2 and F2, but most likely only OFL 105 F1 -wrong weight (it is 28t not 34t) - they forgot the thermals and LRF for optics Concerning the lack of stabilizers, there's 7 more 105 stabilized AMX 30 variant waiting for be added (AMX 30 CH29, AMX 30 valorisé 105, AMX 32 02, AMX 32 03, AMX 30 V, AMX 30 VE, AMX 30 C2) (I do not count the AMX 30 Atlas mk4 as there is no known picture of it)
The devblog for the XM800T stated that it has a stabiliser and laser rangefinder. No clue why it isn't on the dev server and the lack of a stabiliser to counteract the recoil on it is dreadful.
@@peps_hy I don't know why they would even add it to the dev server without including the core mechanics that make it interesting. They haven't added the T80ue-1 yet so their is clearly more vehicles but they just added it without its mechanics.
11:25 Idk if they got it, but considering the T-90M got an autoloader mechanism added in, did they add one to the Type-10/TKXs? 19:50 LMAO a "light tank" thats fucking 61tons
dm 13 is the sap shell the gepard shoots. it is almost identical to the Russian reserve 45mm cannon aphe but it has more filler. this round can one shot certain heavy tanks at 8.3 with cupola shots due to its insane spalling. why is the gepard still only 8.3.
I don't understand whether it was just me or someone else who thought it was similar that getting shot could have caused the death of the entire tank crew was the stupidest thing.
Bro I freaking grew up playing Seek & Destroy on my PS2 back in like 2006! Holy crap, never did I think it would be relevant again or even hear about it again but damn, here we are!
Me too brother! Loved that game. So wacky!
The XM800T seems like the type 87(p), which is literally impossible to get dm63. I gave up spading it because I couldn't kill anyone with it.
What’s funny is the r3, and now the new USH have the same gun as the type87 and xm800t but are at 5.7/6.0 since they are spaa.
@@BearcatThunder you also have the Wiesel with the same round, a 10th the size and gen2+ thermals at 7.3
@@BearcatThunderand also dont have apds
Justin in regards to the Canadian Leo: They said on the dev stream that the armor modules aren’t finished yet.
I missed most of the stream, 6am is a bit early to catch the entire thing.
@@JustinPlaysTV early bird gets the worm!
5:16 they said in the stream that not all the protection is modeled in the Dev server yet
That's mostly the turret, if they leave the hull values as the same as the 2a4 like they did with the 2PL the shown hull protection is more or less final.
@@jasonzhou5783 the 2 a4m has compsite addon armor similar to the a7vso it isnt modeled yet which means the bm60 can get throught he upperfront plate
@@kingtiger6155 It does not, it has addon armor similar to the PSO, which adds to the sides and the driver's hatch slope area, but not the UFP and LFP.
Why can't USA get the LAV-25 with an autocannon for higher tiers instead of just having the LAV-AD with it's useless minigun? RU gets all kinds of IFVs with nice cannons and now other nations too while USA still only has the Bradley and limited LAV-AD
Agree. Most of Russian line-up strength is in the range of IFVs, light tanks and ATGM carriers, in my opinion. US feels severely lacking here.
The PGZ209 got AHEAD rounds and the AHEAD rounds seem to explode based on IRST distance now. They're inconsistent with a small sphere of damage but so much better than before. Also the M1128's canon breech has changed.
holy shit yeah AHEAD works now, thats awesome
Were you able to test AHEAD on the Puma ?
Really? Thank you for telling me, I'll check it out
@@konst915 It's the same round as the PGZ209 one. It's working but inconsistent due to dev server. Also I feel they did this as the 10.0 9035 CV90 will have AHEAD (probably).
@Kwisss Alright thanks. Finally i dont feel inferior to the 2s38 anymore.
F4F KWS (Kampfwertsteigerung) LV (Luftverteidigung) sits at 12.7, you just got GRB mode selected (11.7).
Derp, I had forgotten about the BR separations.. Guess it still made sense anyways xP
german words could pass for an alien language
@@Just_A_Random_Desk you can say that to any language you dont speak. German actually makes a lot of sense
@@Just_A_Random_Desk you can say that to any language you dont speak. German actually makes a lot of sense
@@captainredshirt1346 nah german and polish are just people hitting their heads on a keyboard and making words
im excited for the Desert Warrior hopes it gets thermals and also it can actually fire its missiles on the move (atleast on dev server) and thats a big deal for me
The dev blog says the XM800T will be Stabilized
either give the Namer 6 extra crew like the BTR SPAA gets for no reason, or 6 extra missiles
As a belgian i'm really happy to see my country coming in the game with vehicules that looks good : )
The biggest winner for me is Italy with the first working Top tier MBT as the Leopard 2A7. However still a useless SPAA in the Lineup. BUT STILL, THANK YOU!!!
And also Sweden! The Gripen JAS39C with SAPHE will get the job done and replace the useless Gripen JAS39A with nerfed GBU dropping speed...
Giving the war thunder F-15C FAST packs is hilarious... basically "here's a ton of extra fuel and drag, which you'll never use on our tiny maps". Even the sim maps are tiny as hell. Don't need the 23k lb with bags, let alone the 30k lb with FAST.
I was thinking the same thing. I work on f15 fuel tanks and I just don’t get why anyone would ever want them. Our pilots don’t even want them. They are super heavy and though they don’t look like it add a ton of drag.
Maybe the Benelux ground tree will come next update (Which should be in mid-late August or early September)? Along with the low tier Hungarian aircraft too?
I f*cking hope so, I seriously want the M39 Pantserwagen, the T-15, the T-13, the TOW launcher version of the YP-408, and the Vickers Carden-Lloyd tankette armed with 47mm M1931 AT gun. Plus the Heja, the Me-210, the RMI-1 X/H, and the WM-21 Solyom.
For the CV9035DK, both the APDS and the API are used in the Gepard. Same DM13 and DM23. So yeah, the DM13 is capable of magnificent post pen damage.
This thing will shred everything's sides. The Gepard can get through T-series flanks by shooting the lower side of the hull ( about 40mm thick ) and the DM13 just destroy everything inside.
The APDS is good but lacks post pen damage and will definitely not feel that good on flanks. But being capable of piercing breech is good
Was really hoping they would have added m829a3 for the SepV2. Now the Abrams is in an even worse state now.
Be realistic, nothing really changed the Abrams with this update. If the new hydro pump is vehicle breaking for you, then the vehicle isn't the issue 💀
With the addition of a module for autoloaders, they should make it to where it doesn’t completely stop you from loading, but significantly slow you down. As in a real life scenario in case of loader failure the gun can be manually loaded, but it drops RoF significantly. Down to about two rounds per minute. You’d still be at a disadvantage but at least not completely helpless. As for the Abrams it needs some significant love. That turret ring is to big a weakness to be making the tank even weaker.
I think since they added damageable autoloaders, it seems only fair that they should add a variable reload rate for manual breach loaded tanks, depending on how fast the tank is moving and how bumpy the terrain is (perhaps partly mitigated by crew skill).
@@toma3025 not gonna lie that would be a cool addition in my book. At a stand still maximum output and slows down the faster you’re moving. I like the way you think.
The Bernau was a Post-WW2 ship built for the Volksmarine (People's Navy), whose belligerent was the DDR (GDR). It was built around the early 1960s as to fight against any Western Aggression through low-flying aircraft such as helicopters. It was still in service as East Germany fell but was scrapped as it was too fragile to be made into a supposed museum ship. But the plans were kept in the Bundesarchiv (Federal Archive) so that's were Gajin got this ship's weaponry and performancy accurately.
9:46 YEAH BABY! Britain has definitely suffered the least in it's existence this year
Warrior is not good, not bad, just decent
Man even though this guy doesn’t have a trillion followers his vids are always so entertaining props to you 🔥🔥
The T80s probably didn't get an autoloader modelled yet because they use a different autoloader from the T72s and T90s which has yet to be completed, just a guess though.
One thing the devs forgot to mention when talking about the ui is if you look at the stats of said vehicle, where it shows the br, for air it will show both its grb and arb brs.
Sat in a CV9035 (Danish) not long ago! Super neat. I am very saddened by no thermals, because they exist, and they're clean asf.
it's dev server, it will get thermals.
The XM800T is missing laser rangefinder, stabilizer and DM63 has less penetraion. All of these are bugs and the devs are aware about them
Some things id like to mention
The type 10/TKX also has the autoloader modelled
2S38 and PUMA have a ton of new modules
Gaijin once again fucked up the names of not one, but both new Israeli vehicles. Improved Baz should be the "F-15C Akef" and the Namer 30 is actually called the Bamer RCWS, and is a prototype, which is funny that we get it TT, when there is an actual production version with a full turret and trophy APS
Also, the Namer is not the first light tank in the Israel tree. There is the AMX 13 and AML 90
Btw Namer is pronounced Nuh-mur as against name-r
Also the Derby missile is not just an aim 120, it's a modification of the Python 4
More thing a to Meriton are that the A6E tram has a new type of GBU, you might want to check that out.
Also, the GBUs used by the new Brazilian AMX, are Israeli made interestingly enough.
Btw the Bison uses R-77 irl, so odd it didn't get them now.
Also last thing, extremely happy to have the Namer, but the fact that it still has the merkava mk4's botched armour is sad. So many incredible bug reports on the Merkavas missing SLERA armour have been ignored by gaijin. Oh well, the namer being famously the most armoured APC/IFV in the world doesn't matter to gaijin
Thanks for reading my rant
I heard puma got spikes is that true?
@@anonymouseye1389 i dont believe so
Gaijin need to add the cvrt family lol, there’s so many British ground vehicles which would fill the empty light tank gaps there
9:46 Desert Warrior the Kuwait Army Version of the Warrior , I've been waiting for this for long time , finally I can see something from my beloved country Kuwait 😍
I saw it in real life many times , its so cool.
As an Italy main, i couldnt be happier with this update.
the VEXTRA 105 can be 9.3-9.7 if the snale want it (thermal sight, modern APFSDS, Lazer rangefinder) and France really need it
In regards to the Haguro, shes the sister ship to the Myoko, which we have in game as Japans 5.7 premium cruiser.
Hey the seek and destroy ps2 game was my childhood. What a blast of a game
the dm13 from the cv9035dk, is the same round as on the 35mm SPAA platforms (gepard,chieftain marksman, etc.) including the sabot being the dm23 for the apds belts on the SPAA platforms
😛😋😜😝 Just seeing this paint-scheme makes me laugh. I was the crew chief on this very F-15C while I was deployed to Operation Southern Watch in the winter of 93-94 when we were deployed to SW Asia for Desert Storm. It was an aircraft in "Red-section" (60th FS) and I deployed with the "Blue-section" (58th FS) and this jet was 'my jet' while we were out there. Back then it had an EG on the tail for Eglin AFB.
They can still add the terminator, the British Ajax which is now in service the boxer which is another British vehicle, the striker, the M10 booker, ZBD05/ZTD05. Latest version of the Bradley. Kurganets ect.
You missed the other aditions for the brits, Sea Harrier FA 2 at 12.3 also with the aim120B, the JAS39C gets the R-darter, currently higher G than the Aim120
Yes but to be fair his expertise is in ground content
british main here, if u hate the warrior u havn't played it enough :)
It's my most played together with falcon lmao
It can work, but it isn't a favourable vehicle, I do like the way you can stick your atgm over ridges, but thats only the real upside of it for me
It’s just not up to par and that’s a fact. It can perform well but it’s just not as good as other available options from other nations. The Milan is very very good, it’s easy to aim has decent damage is relatively fast and generally is very competitive with all other ATGMS at the BR (outside of some strange examples on ATGM carriers that are super crazy) however the gun is just not it at all the pen is nice but the super low fire rate, combined with the reload and the lack of stabilization just make it frustrating at best the Bradly does everything you do but with double the ATGMs triple the fire rate and a dual axis stabilizer same with the BMP-2. The closest competitor is the marder from Germany but the marder has much better gun targeting speed and the fire rate lets it chew up light vehicles and MBT modules faster although at the cost of being able to actually pen MBT armor
@@Grebogoborp the warrior has a better reverse speed, it gets gen 2 thermals and it has the best penning rounds. I don't mind the fire rate since most of my kills are in 1-2 shots.
@@marcohorodnichev9489 the stab and single ATGM are the biggest issues I have played all nations except china through 10.3 and have all of the IFVs in the game including event vehicles from every nation except china and IFVs are my favorite vehicle class and even with all that I still cannot stand the warrior it’s just too frustrating to be at that BR with no stabilizer and a fire rate that low
I was hoping for a new French ground premium to bridge the gap between ranks 7 and 8. Currently there is no premium vehicle that can effectively grind rank 8.
Always love it when a vehicle i remember from Arma 3 gets added to War Thunder. This time the Namer.
on the dev blog of the 2a4m it is stated that the armor is equivalent to the 2a7's it's just not fully modeled yet
I think they announced that vehicles like the M1128 would be getting spall liners this update, might be worth checking out?
So, I wasn't the only one to play Seek and Destroy as a child lol. People don't know, but that game was hard as hell for a kid to play! Some of those levels were incredibly challenging!
9:25 The German and Finnish T-72M1 and the Spruts which have the same autoloader don’t have it.
Hey, Justin. Desert Warrior isn't finished on the dev. It'll get a few more modelling done (Spall Liners!) and it'll get gen 3 (I think) thermals. Maybe a few more missiles if we can find the evidence for them as well.
17:12 the f-16am also has irst mounted on the airintake
That’s not an IRST, it’s an ECM (actually only an RWR) called CARAPACE made by Dassault.
You missed the thrust vectoring fox 3 missiles on the mirage 2000. And it gets 8 missiles now, they unlocked the rest of the hardpoints. You could potentially take a lot of ordinance for both ground and air.
If more aircraft are added to the Benelux sub tree in the future, here are a few that I wish to see.
For the Netherlands, we have: The Fokker T.V, the T.VIII, the T.IX, the D.XXIII, theA-17 Nomad, the P-40D, the Dornier Do 24, the Sea Fury, the H-19, the H--34, the UH-1 Huey, the Barracuda, the F-84G, and the F-86D.
For Belgium, we have: The Hawker Hurricane, the Fairey Battle, the Typhoon, the Alouette II, the Phantom FGR.2, the Harrier GR.5, the Tornado GR.1, the F-15C, and the Alpha Jet.
The alfa jet’s already in the tt, tho the Netherlands might have a different version?
Well here's my list for if we ever get a Benelux ground tree.
For the Netherlands, we have: The M39 Pantserwagen, the Pantserwagen M-36 & M-38 (Landsverk L-181 & L-180 in Dutch service respectively), the Leopard 2A6, the YPR-765, the Panzerhaubitze 2000 (When Germany gets it too), the Fennek (An AA variant is armed with 4 Stinger missiles), the AMX-VCI (The VTT variant armed with a TOW launcher), the YP-408 (A variant was armed with a TOW launcher), and the AMX-13.
For Belgium, we have: The T-13 TD, the T-15 light tank, the AMC 35, the SA F.R.C. 47 mm (A Carden Loyd tankette armed with a 47 mm Model 1931 anti-tank gun), the EBRC Jaguar, the Sherman Firefly, the M113 (A variant armed with MILAN ATGM), the M4A3 105, the M24 Chaffee, the M26 Pershing, the M46 & M47 Patton, the Leopard 1, the M22 Locust, the AIFV (What the YPR-765 originated from), the M41 Walker Bulldog, the M109, the M44, the JPz 4-5, and the SIBMAS (Engineered off of the Ratel prototype and is armed with the 90mm Cockerill Mk.III gun, variants include one armed with the 30mm RARDEN cannon and one which had a bank of either HOT or MILAN ATGMs).
@@Iron_Blood_Enjoyer1933 benelux ground tree is next patch after that one like usual.
That Belgian list is extremely wrong.
For Belgium: R.36, r.37, hurricane H-34, R-38, T-33, Mirage 5BA mirsip, RF-84-F, mirage 5BR, alpha jet, etc.
the F16AM sacrifices its HMD for a MAW system so its probably going to be the best CAS/sim F16
Im gonna sart grinding france now, im Belgian. Im also gonna grind italy because its italy.
the Leopard 2A4M also fires DM53 and DM53A1, armour of the 2A4M seems to be very unfinished tho.
The F-4F which we already have in the TT should already have 9L's (which it fired IRL, not the 9E nor 9J). The F-4F ICE should tbh get AIM-9L/i or 9L/i-1 because those are technically 9L's upgraded to be 9M's.
IRIS-T was also fired from the F-4F ICE but only from the test squadron. AIM-9L/i or 9L/i-1 should be sufficient imho
the t80 uses a hydraulic autloader while the t72's and t90's use an electrical autloader, so id assume thats why the autoloaders arent modeled yet
15:26 this sounds like some James Bond villain XD
Wild that yet again someone other than Germany has a better version of its best tank lol
finally a Leo appreciator, hearing spookston say the leopard looks like the TV-8 made me loose a few braincells.
The Strv122 B Evolution is probably the only leo that looks like a TV-8 tbh
The Leos are sexy af.
The APIT from the CV9035 is the same as the one on the Gepard wich is pretty good for side-shot in my opinon.
its great because gepard has two cannons and insane firerate, but i highly doubt cv9035 will be anywhere that good
PS, from initial testing done by other people the R-77 seems to have worse pull and be slower than the MICA
Justin pulls one of my favorite tank games as a kid, beat it several times. I know it's not his forte but it would be cool if we could stream that game for April fools at least once
6:33 i guess KWS stands for "Kampfwertsteigerung" what literely means Combat value increase. So it schould have the same meaning like ICE, the "Improoved Combat Efficiency". But i have no clue what the LV stands for...
6:40 And the BR for it is 12.7, just for Ground Battles its 11.7.
Many people really have get to used to the new different BRs on one vehicle...
I wish gaijin would not disable us from shooting when the barrel is destroyed, like nothing is stoping it from shooting. Just significantly reduce the velocity and penetration of the shell fired and even make the trajectory of the fired shell go random places. This would help when someone breaks our barrel and still have a fighting chance to break their barrel or tracks so you can escape.
Well your barrel can be destroyed and you can still shoot, but your shots are highly inaccurate and penertration is far worse (might orange a track) (broken barrel has 2 states, 1 you can't shoot at all, and 1 with what is mentioned)
Yep. Been killed plenty of times when in an IFV, by tanks whose barrels I thought I'd broken, only to realise that I only partially (orange/red shading) damaged them.
t80's have a different autoloader, which is probably why their dm is not there yet
The namer having only 2 spikes and being at 10.3 is such a gaijin thing the only thing at 10.3 is the the imp chapparal... give it some more missiles or make it the namer with the trophy APS system on it and up the br to 11-11.3 so it has a lineup
16km lock range is when the missle goes pitbull
Can a review video be done on the MiG-21 Bison, Namer 30, and CV9035DK when the update drops later on?
Seek and Destroy and Panzer Front were my childhood
Apparently the a6e tram gets some new agm’s I can’t wait to see that it will make it a bit dirty I think
the 16km lock range on the aim120A is beacuse it is an ACTIVE homing missile. meaniing at 16KM the radar onboard the missile goes 'PITBULL' and no longer needs guidance from the aircraft its launched from.
10:15 They said in the dev stream that it should get gen 2 or 3
Czech republic still missing War Thunder. I hope it will comes in some later update. I will wait as long as possible to see it.
the phantom is at 12.7 in air rb, while on ground rb its at 11.7
OMFG Seek and Destroy ps2, man. I fuckin loved that game
they could add some swiss tanks, there sadly are none in the game yet
The F-4$ is the ICE and its 12.7 in Air RB...good luck with that
Happy for the Desert Warrior and the Namer but the only thing that matters is the 2A7HU, other than that we also got some cool features but very meh patch overall.
I still play seek and destroy today it was the game that got me into tanks best game I've ever played
Should do videos on older based tank games
Vextra has
-wrong gun (hence wrong ammo)
maybe we will get thehistorical OFL 105 G2 and F2, but most likely only OFL 105 F1
-wrong weight (it is 28t not 34t)
- they forgot the thermals and LRF for optics
Concerning the lack of stabilizers, there's 7 more 105 stabilized AMX 30 variant waiting for be added (AMX 30 CH29, AMX 30 valorisé 105, AMX 32 02, AMX 32 03, AMX 30 V, AMX 30 VE, AMX 30 C2) (I do not count the AMX 30 Atlas mk4 as there is no known picture of it)
Hey Justin, Mike and Oxy confirmed on the Livestream the 2A4M's armour isnt modeled properly yet
as a dutch person i feel EXTREMELY ripped off with both F-16s having belgian markings
As a belgium i'm really happy haha
But france will have dutch 2a6m2 in the future ; )
Jokes aside, the maus in seek and destroy fully upgraded was pretty good, even if it could fly.
KF41 originally had only 2 missiles, then they added one reload.
Seek & Destroy had a killed split screen mode
They need to have more modern spaa
Man I’m so disappointed you didn’t talk about the mica em’s at all 😢
The devs didnt had the time to add new vehicles and make new modules, there is plenty of vehicles to be added to the game
yeah i would love a video on the mig 21 bison
The Phantom is at 12.7 u selected ground rb where it is 11.7
Justin, are we getting sales soon?
How is the Desert Warrior a higher BR than ghe ZBD?
The devblog for the XM800T stated that it has a stabiliser and laser rangefinder. No clue why it isn't on the dev server and the lack of a stabiliser to counteract the recoil on it is dreadful.
Maybe because it’s not finished ?
@@peps_hy I don't know why they would even add it to the dev server without including the core mechanics that make it interesting. They haven't added the T80ue-1 yet so their is clearly more vehicles but they just added it without its mechanics.
because it dev server???
@@peps_hy not finished and they are kind of rushing the devblogs
And why it would be 7.7 with that as well. Seems a bit overtuned for 7.7 lol
The A4E skyhawk in Israel and America both got bumped up to 9.3 BR
U didnt mention the derby which is might be the fastest fox 3 in game
The only thing with the 2a4m is it technically should have 2a7 level armor ... sooooooo can't make it too op but also WHERE THE ARMOR AT
You miss MICA - EM, ARH Missiles ??? New Missiles for France Air
11:25 Idk if they got it, but considering the T-90M got an autoloader mechanism added in, did they add one to the Type-10/TKXs?
19:50 LMAO a "light tank" thats fucking 61tons
you forget MICA on the french mirage 2000
dm 13 is the sap shell the gepard shoots. it is almost identical to the Russian reserve 45mm cannon aphe but it has more filler. this round can one shot certain heavy tanks at 8.3 with cupola shots due to its insane spalling. why is the gepard still only 8.3.
Those are conformal fuel tanks for the f15.
If the lynx had two reloads for the spikes, people would play it as well. The Spike LR are great but 2 missiles....yeah thats a straight up no.
actually really sad the mig 21 bison is a premium and doesnt get its r77's
Holy shoot, someone else who played PS2 Seek and Destroy other then me. IM NOT ALONE!!!!!
the 2A4M should have the same if not even better kinetic protection than the leopard 2A5, gaijin screwed up again
I don't understand whether it was just me or someone else who thought it was similar that getting shot could have caused the death of the entire tank crew was the stupidest thing.