I know im asking randomly but does anyone know a trick to log back into an instagram account?? I was stupid forgot the account password. I love any tricks you can offer me
I mentioned this in the previous Tarrasch video, and I thought it would increase everyone's vast knowledge: The idea of placing your rooks behind passed pawns is actually called Tarrasch’s Rule. Thanks for the great videos Antonio! =)
Hi agad! Please could you do an explanation of the famed opening lines, such as the kings Indian and so on, maybe some history as to how they got their names would be amazing to learn about.
@@terrymarshall8746 zugzwang is little different, it means you are loosing because you have to move something, but every move is loosing - but if you could skip move, you could save game. But in the final position white would loose even if he could skip move.
Lajos Berényi I know what Zugzwang is, that’s why “In the spirit “ which it is. Regardless, it was just a comment about a nice game. No reason for people to get butt hurt.
@@terrymarshall8746 the final position is very far from the spirit of the zugzwang. You very much miss the spirit of the zugzwang if you think it is. I agree, it was a very nice game.
@@matteopriotto5131 That's vast knowledge right there! Could explain the reason he didn't study openings. Some would call it lazy, I call it misunderstood.
Capablanca never ceases to amaze, what an amazing talent he was. Thanks for making this series, because we can actually see the talent that one of the most underrated world champions of all time had.
Globe Alone Well, Id heard about Kasparov, Karpov, Fischer and Lasker, amongst few others, before i even knew how the pieces moved, but never had i hear about Capablanca before agad started the series
If you thought capablanca was underrated, I guess you are new to chess, many books contain capablanca brillancy, mostly the endgame. Also quite a few books mention him as legendary. He was never underrated, maybe you just don't know him because he was in a different era. All world champions after him also held capablanca in the highest regard
underrated??...NO WAY he is considered the best of all time for many people, he cant be underrated.......in fact Karpov is more underrated than Capa....and he is not...
Karpov is vastly underrated. He earned the title from the resignation of Fischer, and he lived in the shadow of Kasparov his entire 2nd half of his career. Karpov, is one of the strongest players to have ever played as well. His life time score against Kasparov is the closest of any rivalry ever. Capablanca is far from underrated. Capablanca is literally in the top 5 strongest players on everyone's list. If you run his game against Marshall in the Marshall Attack through an engine, you will realize that he made 0 inaccuracies, mistakes, or blunders. It is the most sound game I've ever seen. He just played engine moves while his king was chased across the board from the attack.
that sounds just crushing..... "i can´t show you anything because any move loses"............... and i´m glad i found the move with the bishop at the end...... those quizzes are finally paying off somewhat
Hehe, i like how Lasker played both sides. First Capablanca gets called Lasker, later Tarrasch. :p Anyway, great video! I want to add some random information in case you didnt know about that Agadmator. Of his 578 tournament games Capablanca only lost 37!
Have u guys noticed that agmadators always includ "we"- we are back at 1914" that means that you respect all of us and take our opinion what to show in channell and this is why I love u man 💜
Thank you Agad I subscribed you last year in January And since then i watched all of your videos First i liked chess but just because of you I LOVE CHESS NOW
thanks agad for reviving the love of chess in me. i used to play a lot in my younger years i even won 3rd place in national chess championship. but stopped playing in high school. thanks a lot agad...
This saga lead me to tarrasch and Lasker rivalry ..There was no love lost between the two masters. The story goes that when they were introduced at the opening of their 1908 championship match, Tarrasch clicked his heels, bowed stiffly, and said, "To you, Dr. Lasker, I have only three words, check and mate"-then left the room.
Even tho it might have occured to others, the word you're looking for is "showstopper". That was a showstopper move. I'd like to compare it to giants but it would be a sacrilege.
After a possible queen exchange (just after 34. Qe2 Bd2 ) i think that it would be possible to defend the dark square bishop with Rd1? But "the doctor" simply wanted to fullfill a sneaky plan to bring a checkmate Qf8+... Qg7# I already watched the video yesterday but i hesitated to ask: how much opening preparation did Capablanca bring to this game ;) ?
The Capablanca saga is a great follow up to the Fischer saga. I didn't know Capablanca was such a skilled end game player, like Fischer. If I ever played Fischer, Capablanca, Carlsen and we had an equal middle game, I would just resign. Their end game is just too strong and there's nothing to do here.
When white doubled his pawns on the f file it was over. The kingside attack white was going for was inadvisable against the well defended black king. All black had to do was solidify his position and create weaknesses on the white king with check threats. And Cap did it beautifully I might add.
I have a question about those long lines you describe that boil down to a couple of pieces and 3 - 4 pawns for each side. Did the players calculate those lines while playing and then chose to avoid them, or is it just a coincidence that those would have lead to relatively equal positions?
Hi. My first comment. I have been working on this endgame intermittently for two days. It seems to me this game is salvageable as a draw for Tarrasch. Either Q takes Q, followed by knight takes queen, R to d1, knight takes bishop, rook takes bishop, knight takes the other bishop, rook takes pawn. White ends up down a piece but can push the 'a' pawn and take black's c pawn eventually until it's rook and knight vs rook with all else equal. Every way I play it I can find a draw but maybe I'm missing something? Alternatively, white can respond Q to g3, threatening mate on g7. White loses the rook in this scenario but again it looks drawable to me. Did Tarrasch so fear Capablanca he threw in the towel early? Especially given how we've seen Lasker outmaneuver Capablanca while at a disadvantage, pulling out a draw with superior endgame play, I think Tarrasch made a mistake. Your thoughts much appreciated. Thank you for your great channel which has lifted my chess skills and fed a longtime passion.
It is not drawable. In the first variant, you go Nd8 to Ne6. Defending your c pawn with the knight while the knight will be protected by the f pawn. Rook can always go to the a8 to block the pass a pawn. You are also up a pawn and the king can easily enter the game by going to the h7. If white rook stop protecting the a pawn to go after f or g pawns, black would happily trade white's a pawn for them and win the game easily with the extra piece and the pawn. Otherwise, black is going to win by making moves with the knight since white's rook can't leave the a pawn without protection. If you want to try this you can add me on lichess to play this position. My username is Araws. Other variant is even worse so I think refuting the first variant is enough to prove that this is a simple win for black.
11:02 Why not just move the queen to D5? I immediately saw it. You don't need to worry about the pawn. he can't move if you check the king. And unless I'm missing something, it's also a mate since the knight blocks the only escape path.
After white captures the dark square bishop on d4, that knight will also attack the now undefended light square bishop on c6, so your rook attacking the bishop on d2 doesn't help the problem of having two pieces attacked
I haven´t had my coffee yet but why not white´s bishop takes the g7 pawn with check and regardless of which of the three possible moves for the black king, white´s rook slides over to the g file (with check in one case or protecting the bishop in the other two) while getting away from black´s bishop. Then depending on black´s moves, white´s queen can still jump to a1, f8 or g3
David Anton Savage took me a while but after black king moves out of the check and Qe3xBb2 black would play Qe4 check and after f3 Qe4xf3! either Rg1g2 or Qd2g2 then Qf3xRg2 Qd2xQg2 and after Nf4xQg2 Kh1xNg2 white is just down the exchange and will lose with a Bishop against a rook
#suggestion if you haven't already, you should cover the famous game between spassky and Bobby Fischer where spassky beat him with the kings gambit and Fischer wrote "a bust to the kings gambit" in response
When the move d5 was played, could he not have taken the pawn with the bishop. The knight wasn't protecting it still and taking the bishop with the queen would've lost to bg7 check, picking up the queen
@Oissev Onos I read that before his championship match with Lasker, Tarrasch refused to shake hands, stating " To you Herr Lasker I have only these words to say: check and mate."
@Oissev Onos I appreciate your insights. I don't know the whole story, but it seems Tarrasch is always portrayed in somewhat of a bad light. One of my favorite books "My System" also mentions Tarrasch ridiculing Nimzowitschs' ideas and ever since I have had a somewhat negative feeling about him, whether that is right or wrong , who knows? Sometimes in competitive arenas it makes it more interesting to have a "bad guy"! Have a great night!
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
2:53 Lasker just came and made a move for Capablanca
what a gentleman
I've noticed that, too!
2:53 The Lasker Saga Beginns...
My favorite phrase so far: "unless you are Lasker, Lasker would figure something out"
I know im asking randomly but does anyone know a trick to log back into an instagram account??
I was stupid forgot the account password. I love any tricks you can offer me
@Thomas Roy Instablaster ;)
You are awesome! I feel I am actually in the room with the players when you narrate it! Keep it up! :D
I mentioned this in the previous Tarrasch video, and I thought it would increase everyone's vast knowledge:
The idea of placing your rooks behind passed pawns is actually called Tarrasch’s Rule. Thanks for the great videos Antonio! =)
"except for Lasker, he would figure out something".........Cool stuff!!
It's been a long time please a Tal game 😍
Maybe if we reach 400K
@@sikelelagladile7736 - you mean *when* :)
Sikelela Gladile atolladero
impressive... capablanca must´ve really trusted his best friend lasker for letting him make a move for capablanca
Hi agad! Please could you do an explanation of the famed opening lines, such as the kings Indian and so on, maybe some history as to how they got their names would be amazing to learn about.
Yeah this would be awesome and increase our vast knowledge
#suggestion
Yes, specially telling the story, famous games/players etc
Vast knowledge 0:00
First move 1:17
Feel free to pause the video 12:15
So much great analysis of subtle things like inner vs outer pawn value, and distance from king to passed pawn. Thank you.
Yes little gems like this make me a better player (i need all the help i can get)
The ultimate Zugzwang! Every move loses! Nice game.
it's not zugzwang, as the white postion is just overloaded.
In spirit it is!
@@terrymarshall8746 zugzwang is little different, it means you are loosing because you have to move something, but every move is loosing - but if you could skip move, you could save game. But in the final position white would loose even if he could skip move.
Lajos Berényi I know what Zugzwang is, that’s why “In the spirit “ which it is. Regardless, it was just a comment about a nice game. No reason for people to get butt hurt.
@@terrymarshall8746 the final position is very far from the spirit of the zugzwang. You very much miss the spirit of the zugzwang if you think it is. I agree, it was a very nice game.
2:50 who???? Lol
11:40 Emanuel Vs Lasker ended in a draw
Little known fact: Capablanca could channel the champ at will.
@@danceswithstone Capablanca could transform his opponent into Lasker and even turn himself into Lasker
@@matteopriotto5131 That's vast knowledge right there! Could explain the reason he didn't study openings. Some would call it lazy, I call it misunderstood.
@@danceswithstone I can't explain why people refer to Tal as "the Magician" when it seems like Capablanca was actually a wizard
Capablanca never ceases to amaze, what an amazing talent he was.
Thanks for making this series, because we can actually see the talent that one of the most underrated world champions of all time had.
I thought he was legendary not underrated. Id heard about him before I knew anything about chess
Globe Alone Well, Id heard about Kasparov, Karpov, Fischer and Lasker, amongst few others, before i even knew how the pieces moved, but never had i hear about Capablanca before agad started the series
If you thought capablanca was underrated, I guess you are new to chess, many books contain capablanca brillancy, mostly the endgame. Also quite a few books mention him as legendary. He was never underrated, maybe you just don't know him because he was in a different era. All world champions after him also held capablanca in the highest regard
underrated??...NO WAY he is considered the best of all time for many people, he cant be underrated.......in fact Karpov is more underrated than Capa....and he is not...
Karpov is vastly underrated. He earned the title from the resignation of Fischer, and he lived in the shadow of Kasparov his entire 2nd half of his career. Karpov, is one of the strongest players to have ever played as well. His life time score against Kasparov is the closest of any rivalry ever.
Capablanca is far from underrated. Capablanca is literally in the top 5 strongest players on everyone's list. If you run his game against Marshall in the Marshall Attack through an engine, you will realize that he made 0 inaccuracies, mistakes, or blunders. It is the most sound game I've ever seen. He just played engine moves while his king was chased across the board from the attack.
that sounds just crushing..... "i can´t show you anything because any move loses"............... and i´m glad i found the move with the bishop at the end...... those quizzes are finally paying off somewhat
“Checkmate... This is even worse 🤣”
12:47, could someone please explain to me why white can't just play Qxd2 and be totally fine?
Because of Qe4+, Kg1, Qg2#
Qxe4 is mate in 2
@@christovennagara9162 Thanks mate!
@@franciscocalatayud8080 Thank you!
No worries!
Hehe, i like how Lasker played both sides. First Capablanca gets called Lasker, later Tarrasch. :p Anyway, great video! I want to add some random information in case you didnt know about that Agadmator. Of his 578 tournament games Capablanca only lost 37!
You are amazing. This game is maybe the one that gives me the idea of beauty in chess for the first time.
Have u guys noticed that agmadators always includ "we"- we are back at 1914" that means that you respect all of us and take our opinion what to show in channell and this is why I love u man 💜
you said Lasker went for at 2:53
lol!! 😂😂
This saga made Capablanca my favorite chess player. Win, lose, or draw.
I also say “Hello everyone” out loud with Antonio at the start of every video.
Don't we all?
I am really enjoying the Capablanca saga. The quality of your channel is just lightyears ahead of anyone else's.
2:54 Lasker = Capablanca thanks for sharing that vast knowledge
12:28 --- I found Ne2
Antonio: Ne2 is
Me: Hooray!
Antonio: ...is a possible move.., but much faster is...
Thank you Agad
I subscribed you last year in January
And since then i watched all of your videos
First i liked chess but just because of you I LOVE CHESS NOW
9:42 "Unless you're Lasker. Lasker would figure something out." Agad is just awesome and I'm now super interested in Lasker now.
thanks agad for reviving the love of chess in me. i used to play a lot in my younger years i even won 3rd place in national chess championship. but stopped playing in high school. thanks a lot agad...
This saga lead me to tarrasch and Lasker rivalry ..There was no love lost between the two masters. The story goes that when they were introduced at the opening of their 1908 championship match, Tarrasch clicked his heels, bowed stiffly, and said, "To you, Dr. Lasker, I have only three words, check and mate"-then left the room.
I bet it seemed cooler when he imagined it in his head
This was the first time I was able to guess the position. I jumped with joy. Love your videos man!
Who else want agadmator to be commentator?
Very nice analysis...really nice overload by Capa
Very cool game. Thanks for the consistently excellent coverage.
I imagine Tarrasch being complete gentleman when losing.
11:19 why not bishop x d5 attacking the queen?
if queen takes you have dark bishop x g7 with check winning the queen
Right. Didn t see that. Ty
Even tho it might have occured to others, the word you're looking for is "showstopper". That was a showstopper move. I'd like to compare it to giants but it would be a sacrilege.
OCCURRED. BLOODY OCCURRED. NOT OCCURED. WTF IS OCCURED ANYWAYS, YOU ILLITERATE BASTARD
After a possible queen exchange (just after 34. Qe2 Bd2 ) i think that it would be possible to defend the dark square bishop with Rd1? But "the doctor" simply wanted to fullfill a sneaky plan to bring a checkmate Qf8+... Qg7#
I already watched the video yesterday but i hesitated to ask: how much opening preparation did Capablanca bring to this game ;) ?
2:53 capablanca transposes into Lasker only to retreat losing tempo
That last move of Capablanca is greatest counterattack of this game..
Capablanca has now taken the lead in my inspirational player list... Clean chess!
The Capablanca saga is a great follow up to the Fischer saga. I didn't know Capablanca was such a skilled end game player, like Fischer. If I ever played Fischer, Capablanca, Carlsen and we had an equal middle game, I would just resign. Their end game is just too strong and there's nothing to do here.
Queen to D2
I am not a very strong player, so it might be a stupid question. But why at 12:35 Qd2 is not possible? Why he can’t just capture de bishop?
Nvm I found the mate in 3 =D
Good work
Also if you capture the Bishop on d2 it is mate in 3! Madness!
Great video on the game!
I'd really like to hear your commentary on Blitz game 13 of the Champions Showdown between Sam Shankland and Richard Rapport.
When white doubled his pawns on the f file it was over. The kingside attack white was going for was inadvisable against the well defended black king. All black had to do was solidify his position and create weaknesses on the white king with check threats. And Cap did it beautifully I might add.
I am an excellent watcher of Capablanca chess games, thank you
2:54 lasker 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Im a simple man, I see agadmator post a new video and I instalike.
I have a question about those long lines you describe that boil down to a couple of pieces and 3 - 4 pawns for each side. Did the players calculate those lines while playing and then chose to avoid them, or is it just a coincidence that those would have lead to relatively equal positions?
You are the man Aga!!!
2 minutes...good subscriber indeed.
2:54 capablanca shaped Lasker spotted.
I can't explain it, but I really like Tarrasch for some reason. He just looks like a guy I want to talk to.
9:43, it's not just Lasker, anyone else like the one who can think such as Carlsen or even Mikhail Tal.
Capa is in the conversation of best of all time.
I'd like to see more of those games from the player that was thought to be Bobby Fischer. I only saw the one game you posted. Did I miss others?
Hi. My first comment. I have been working on this endgame intermittently for two days. It seems to me this game is salvageable as a draw for Tarrasch. Either Q takes Q, followed by knight takes queen, R to d1, knight takes bishop, rook takes bishop, knight takes the other bishop, rook takes pawn. White ends up down a piece but can push the 'a' pawn and take black's c pawn eventually until it's rook and knight vs rook with all else equal. Every way I play it I can find a draw but maybe I'm missing something?
Alternatively, white can respond Q to g3, threatening mate on g7. White loses the rook in this scenario but again it looks drawable to me. Did Tarrasch so fear Capablanca he threw in the towel early? Especially given how we've seen Lasker outmaneuver Capablanca while at a disadvantage, pulling out a draw with superior endgame play, I think Tarrasch made a mistake.
Your thoughts much appreciated. Thank you for your great channel which has lifted my chess skills and fed a longtime passion.
It is not drawable. In the first variant, you go Nd8 to Ne6. Defending your c pawn with the knight while the knight will be protected by the f pawn. Rook can always go to the a8 to block the pass a pawn. You are also up a pawn and the king can easily enter the game by going to the h7. If white rook stop protecting the a pawn to go after f or g pawns, black would happily trade white's a pawn for them and win the game easily with the extra piece and the pawn. Otherwise, black is going to win by making moves with the knight since white's rook can't leave the a pawn without protection. If you want to try this you can add me on lichess to play this position. My username is Araws. Other variant is even worse so I think refuting the first variant is enough to prove that this is a simple win for black.
1:51
why don`t white takes the knight on c6 with bichop to win the e5 pawn ?
Nice game and series,
But how about Lella vs stockfish now?
13:33 why not qe4 check followed by kg1 and qg2 check mate!
Capablanca is a point and a head stronger than all the other players
the Shi - momentum, position, configuration - is insurmountable. He would need to resign when he was afraid to trade queens.
11:02 Why not just move the queen to D5? I immediately saw it. You don't need to worry about the pawn. he can't move if you check the king. And unless I'm missing something, it's also a mate since the knight blocks the only escape path.
Twiztedgoalie I am not really sure what you’re trying to say you can of corse play f3 and everything is fine it’s defended by queen and rook
thanks agad....
you're an excellent youtuber....
Excellent
Why does Capablanca always vs people with black and white pictures but he has colour?
12:34 what if the queen captures the bishop???
3. ... Nh3# (Qg2 is not good because of the white Queen on d2)
Mátyás Barna Before that 1...Qe4+ 2. f3 Qxf3+ 3. Kg1
Isn't after queen e4 check you dont pick up bishop but go queen g2 mate?
Oh yeah sorry he has pawn f3 but I was looking at that the last part of game with qg6 to qg2 mate in some variations.
why didn't you show the first variation: Qxd2?
now I see its mate in 2
Hey I am an amateur chess player but no absolute beginner. I would like to get into opening theories. Can you guys recommend me any books ?
After bishop to d2 move why tarash doesn't capture g7 pawn check?
If you liked this video, congratulations, you are an excellent liker of videos.
And for those who are here only to enjoy the show, the like button is right under the video screen 😁
12:45 why not capture the bishop on B2 with the queen?
At 2:55 Capablanca miraculously turns into Laska...is there anything Jose Raul Capablanca can't do?
Why not FISCHER it. At 4.06 with bishop to C4?
14:18 but you did mention why he played Rb8
#suggestion
Not sure if you’re a DBZ fan, but I’d be pumped to see a video titled “Battle of Gods.”
Amazing how many people can’t find a mate in 3
A move for white could be pawn to a5 from a4
7:09
Doesn't Ba3 trap the rook?
I'm co fused, y cant u capture the bishop
On move 9..... ( Lasker ? ) Bg4 I thought it was Capablanca playing !?.
Straight to the endgame.
7:02 ♫♪♪♫ why oh why didn't I take that Bishop with my Queen ♫♪♪♫ (Tarrasch)
Rc1 to g1 not possible?
Is rook to d1 not a option on 12:57?
After white captures the dark square bishop on d4, that knight will also attack the now undefended light square bishop on c6, so your rook attacking the bishop on d2 doesn't help the problem of having two pieces attacked
Great video agard
why can't Qxd2??
13:14
I dont understand. Why cant the white Queen capture the bishop on d2?
QXB?
Hello Everyone!😀😁
I haven´t had my coffee yet but why not white´s bishop takes the g7 pawn with check and regardless of which of the three possible moves for the black king, white´s rook slides over to the g file (with check in one case or protecting the bishop in the other two) while getting away from black´s bishop. Then depending on black´s moves, white´s queen can still jump to a1, f8 or g3
David Anton Savage took me a while but after black king moves out of the check and Qe3xBb2 black would play Qe4 check and after f3 Qe4xf3! either Rg1g2 or Qd2g2 then Qf3xRg2 Qd2xQg2 and after Nf4xQg2 Kh1xNg2 white is just down the exchange and will lose with a Bishop against a rook
@@onionhater7994 thanx, I will rewind the video and then run your notes on it.
#suggestion if you haven't already, you should cover the famous game between spassky and Bobby Fischer where spassky beat him with the kings gambit and Fischer wrote "a bust to the kings gambit" in response
Because queen captures comes with checkmate
@@mohitsinha3606 huh? What are you talking about
@Oissev Onos and yeah i found that game and looked at it and im not 100% sure that's the one.. It might be. Thank you nonetheless!
@Oissev Onos actually after looking into it more I think that really IS it. I didn't think it was their first encounter that spurred the article!
@Oissev Onos oh! I didnt catch that haha, thanks again :)
When the move d5 was played, could he not have taken the pawn with the bishop. The knight wasn't protecting it still and taking the bishop with the queen would've lost to bg7 check, picking up the queen
OMG I saw that move right away :O
Bd2 if Qxd2 Qe4+ Kg1 Qg2# Right?
If Qe4+ f3 (which might be the computer move) Qxf3 you lose the queen
And rook C1 to D1?
Why queen can't capture bishop ?
The material seems equal but when i put it even on stockfish it gives me around -15
So sad to see Tarrasch lose...he seemed like such a nice guy.
@Oissev Onos well, where do you get this stuff, pretty interesting. I wanna read them as well
@Oissev Onos thanks a lot for making an effort and sharing the details with me, you are very considerate. Cheers and have a great day
@Oissev Onos I read that before his championship match with Lasker, Tarrasch refused to shake hands, stating " To you Herr Lasker I have only these words to say: check and mate."
@Oissev Onos I appreciate your insights. I don't know the whole story, but it seems Tarrasch is always portrayed in somewhat of a bad light. One of my favorite books "My System" also mentions Tarrasch ridiculing Nimzowitschs' ideas and ever since I have had a somewhat negative feeling about him, whether that is right or wrong , who knows? Sometimes in competitive arenas it makes it more interesting to have a "bad guy"! Have a great night!
After Bd2, why not Qxb2? I don't see why it woudn't work. Help please
There will be checkmate after Qe4+ f3 Qxf3+ Kg1 Nh3# (Is N the letter for Knight?)
@@gratitud143 Qe4+ -> f3 and after Qxf3 -> Kg1 and Qeen is covering 2nd rank