Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

How Lula Wants to End Bolsonaro’s Brazil?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 дек 2022
  • Join the VisualPolitik community and support us on Patreon: / visualpolitik
    On 1 January, Lula da Silva will once again become president of Brazil. He will do so after winning an election that has shown that the country is divided in two. The current president, Jair Bolsonaro, came close to winning a second term even though the polls gave him no choice. So the question is: What have been Bolsonaro's main achievements during his presidency? What challenges does Lula da Silva now face? In this video we tell you.
    #Brazil #LATAM #Lula

Комментарии • 820

  • @jorge.luiz1095
    @jorge.luiz1095 Год назад +165

    Just a small correction: the help given by the government during the pandemic was R$ 600 (six hundred reais), not US$ 600 (six hundred dollars), as said in the video. That's a great difference because 1 USD = about R$ 5,40 now

    • @vinny7114
      @vinny7114 Год назад +8

      True, 600 dollars is over 3k there.

    • @ConradOS100
      @ConradOS100 Год назад +9

      Believed what Bolsonaro said in UN opening. Without realizing that he has no commitment to truth

    • @felipenachmanowicz9393
      @felipenachmanowicz9393 Год назад +1

      If it was 600 dollars I'd try and get in, geez!

    • @bravonetgmail7662
      @bravonetgmail7662 Год назад +1

      In every month until today.

    • @JoaoPaulo-ls9ej
      @JoaoPaulo-ls9ej Год назад +11

      And wasn’t bolsonaro, the congress propose it

  • @lem0nhead84
    @lem0nhead84 Год назад +122

    Correction: auxílio Brasil increased from 400 to 600 reais, not dollars.

    • @wilsondassumpcao2089
      @wilsondassumpcao2089 Год назад +3

      O estagiario cometeu uma grande gafe...

    • @ConradOS100
      @ConradOS100 Год назад

      Acho que o estagiário só decidiu acreditar em tudo que o governo federal disse e não se preocupou em pesquisar nada

  • @annysouza8302
    @annysouza8302 Год назад +3

    But that wasn't Bolsonaro. Congress pushed for R $600. Actually Bolsonaro said only R$200

  • @dennisestradda9746
    @dennisestradda9746 Год назад +99

    High commodity prices won’t save brazil this time

    • @oppionatedindividual8256
      @oppionatedindividual8256 Год назад +4

      Well.. vale and petrobras are still making record profits I believe.

    • @renanvinicius6036
      @renanvinicius6036 Год назад +8

      @@oppionatedindividual8256 it's not because we are making more money and spending it, it's because our inflation is really high, then everything gets expansive.

    • @davidmanix3592
      @davidmanix3592 Год назад

      @@renanvinicius6036 Yes! It gets expansively expensive.

    • @claudiofranceschi3416
      @claudiofranceschi3416 Год назад +5

      Brazilian growing during Lula era is not regarding increasing in exports provide for commodity prices, but it was due internal sucess policies of economic stimulus .

    • @renanvinicius6036
      @renanvinicius6036 Год назад +14

      @@claudiofranceschi3416 verdade né cara, o Lula nem assumiu e a bolsa já tá caindo pq ele só fala merd4 e colocou um ministro da economia que estudou só 2 meses de economia KKKKKKK

  • @AShiga
    @AShiga Год назад +30

    This is probably the most unbiased non-Portuguese piece on the current Brazilian politics scenario I've seen. Congratulations!

  • @lem0nhead84
    @lem0nhead84 Год назад +29

    Correction: Fernando Henrique Cardoso (FHC, not FEC)

  • @belerius
    @belerius Год назад +6

    I've always been kind of suspicious of the analyzes on this channel. Seeing how you praised Paulo Guedes, it can be concluded with certainty that this channel is just stupid in its analyzes focused on romantic neoliberal concepts. Also, calling Bolsonaro controversial and not fascist is absurd.

    • @RobertGames2030
      @RobertGames2030 Год назад

      Fascista ? 😂😂😂

    • @RobertGames2030
      @RobertGames2030 Год назад

      Pelo visto nunca estudou História na vida.

    • @belerius
      @belerius Год назад

      @@RobertGames2030 é exatamente o que Bolsonaro é

    • @belerius
      @belerius Год назад

      @@RobertGames2030 Brasil paralelo não conta como estudos blz? Eu n sei que tipo de história vc estudou, mas pelo visto vc deve ter sido educado por fascistas.

    • @RobertGames2030
      @RobertGames2030 Год назад

      @@belerius Meu Pais são Analfabetos nem sabem o que é isso.

  • @harrisonlopes904
    @harrisonlopes904 Год назад +26

    Interesting analysis! Love the Brazil content as it's a massive country with massive geopolitical potential

    • @69notic
      @69notic Год назад

      huge potential in geopolitics ...but that will be never reality with lula ... lula by my opinion are Puppet government and do everything for the Usa investments...nobody know that good or bad ....only future will show where USA leading world .

  • @pedrod.c.609
    @pedrod.c.609 Год назад +9

    Well, I become surprised when you say that the first years of the economy conduction from Paulo Guedes before Pandemic was a good period, because as a Brazilian on this period everything get more expensive: food, oil, electricity.

  • @conhecaafrica
    @conhecaafrica Год назад +14

    Love Brazilian people
    From Mozambique

  • @diogojogo
    @diogojogo Год назад +7

    Didn't do a good homework, many of things are very misleading throughout the video.
    The employment rates didn't reduce properly, they basically changed the definitions of what employment is. Now even if you only work a day per month or sells cupcakes in the sidewalk you are considered to be employed.
    The auxilio brasil was not from Bolsonaro, it was made by the opposition in congress, Bolsonaro tried to stop it.
    It was Bolsonaro himself who claimed, on video, to want to be a cannibal.
    Lula's sentence was not annulled because it was outside of the judge jurisdiction, it was because there was no actual evidence against him and the Judge was working with the prosecutor to arrest Lula just before the 2018 elections. The judge even became one of bolsonaro's ministers in a complete show of conflicting interests.
    The privatization of electricity distribution was a disaster, with some states in BR, like in Amapa 2020, being without power for weeks.
    The idea that GWEDES is a super-minister is an example of propaganda that was taken as fact, he is not the first minister to have a phd, and the rest of his CV is a disaster, including fraud convictions.
    And please, how about everyone stop making plots whose Y axis doesn't start on 0 to make the curves look more steep than in reality?

  • @nicholashoward7251
    @nicholashoward7251 Год назад +70

    Wow finally a video on Brazil! You guys sure do love talking about Argentina....

  • @roadtripsouthamerica767
    @roadtripsouthamerica767 Год назад +5

    Lula had his Lava Jato accusations dropped because the then-judge Mr. Moro was found coordinating with prosecutors on how to convict him. Meaning the judge already had a sentence, only missing the substance needed for conviction.

    • @lucasdecamargosouza8167
      @lucasdecamargosouza8167 11 месяцев назад

      Sim. Mas imagine o nível de complexidade é avaliar de outro país um país tão complexo como o Brasil. Imagine o judiciário do Brasil. No caso específico cheio de coisas que não são nem verossímil. Eu não acreditaria em metade das coisas q eu vi o, se me falassem, nesses últimos anos. As conversas do moro com os procuradores são irreais! Após perder a eleição os apoiadores do bolsonaro fizeram aquele papelão fechando as estradas. O fanatismo político junto com o religioso apresentaram-se do modo mais escabroso da nossa história. Eu estive e estou infiltrado em grupos de bolsonaristas e me assustaria menos se eles dr fato sinalizassem para ETs.

  • @marcoscabrinirianidosreis6655
    @marcoscabrinirianidosreis6655 Год назад +5

    The video is nice, however there are a few things incorrect such as the use of dollar instead of reais, and incorrect pronunciation of names. Also I don’t understand why most of the video is showing images of Brazil back in the 90 lol

  • @fleckensteleworm4889
    @fleckensteleworm4889 Год назад +128

    You have conveniently left out the other victory speech where he said that “there’s no space for the right here” after labeling his entire opposition as sexists, fascists and racists.

    • @theepicfailgamer6317
      @theepicfailgamer6317 Год назад +31

      on purpose*

    • @varimatra2088
      @varimatra2088 Год назад +17

      Where did he say that because I can't find it? two options either you are talking nonsense by intention or it is something very obscure even which i doubt

    • @theepicfailgamer6317
      @theepicfailgamer6317 Год назад +6

      @@varimatra2088 u talking nonsense

    • @theepicfailgamer6317
      @theepicfailgamer6317 Год назад +2

      @@varimatra2088 u literally doubt everything

    • @varimatra2088
      @varimatra2088 Год назад +17

      @@theepicfailgamer6317 Where ? you made a claim that he said that but when i ask where he said you have no answer stop telling lies then and getting defensive when someone asks for evidence

  • @Marina-vu2vi
    @Marina-vu2vi Год назад +2

    Main mistake from Bolsonaro: his mouth

  • @andrewlim9345
    @andrewlim9345 Год назад +71

    Good and balanced analysis of the economic policies of Bolsonaro and Lula. Most content on Brazilian politics in the West has focused on the culture war and political aspects of Brazilian politics.

    • @RobVicRJ
      @RobVicRJ Год назад +11

      Indeed.
      Politics are pretty easy to talk about and have an opinion, but policies are harder to analyze and measure it's impacts. Those should be covered more.

    • @ConradOS100
      @ConradOS100 Год назад +5

      Good and balanced .... 😂😂 shallower than a saucer

    • @gtPacheko
      @gtPacheko Год назад

      @@ConradOS100 dude, shut up

  • @WladimirJAlonso
    @WladimirJAlonso Год назад +5

    Please do your homework about the state of human rights and democracy in Brazil before judging the demonstrations that had been taken place here. There are journalists, citizens and even congressmen stripped of their social media and even jailed because “crimes” of expressing their opinions. The constitutional court (following what happened in Venezuela) is leading Brazil to very dark path, and perhaps one (again like Venezuela) without return.

  • @Silverbolt90
    @Silverbolt90 Год назад +44

    As a Brazilian i did like that video a lot, thanks for posting it.
    As far as the content i'd like to point few things:
    #1The central government annual budget in 2022 represents a number around 50% of the GDP of 2021. (you guys got it right)
    #2 we do not spend 80% of our budget on salaries and pensions. (you guys got it partially right, Brazil budget is freaking confusing althougt i had 10 years of experience working on that area i still get confused sometimes).
    To clarify, the biggest spenditure in brazil today is the public debt amortization which took about 50% of 2022's budget.
    Pensions yes are god damn high but its due to the nature of our welfare roughtly it took about 18% of the 2022 budget, if you disconsider the public debt it would be yes the biggest spenditure around 37% of the budget, but IMO, far from 80%.
    On the other hand, the spenditure with salaries took 7,43% of the public budget.
    #3 The Legal technicality that set Lula free is very arguable, i mean it could had been the reason that he was jailed in first time, so its kinda wrong infer that he was actually guilty of anything (although at personal level i don't actually doubt).
    #4 Yep, Bolsonaro government was a disaster but mainly because he filled the positions with freaking morons just because they came from a military background. Personally i've had more than one time to teach government officials basic math to prove a point while pledging funds to my state at the ministeries. I wonder how these people would react if they had to calculate on the battlefield the artilerry shels path before bombing an enemy postition. LOL.
    I do believe our differences must have something to do with IMF metodology but still i'd like to point that hehe.
    Anyway, if you guys are interested in Brazil pollitics and open data (i run a website that posts about pollitics looking at the public data avaiable to try to explain whats going on.) i put myself avaiable for contact, questions collaborations etc via my DM. (@debem666 on Twitter )
    Best regards and thanks for the video :D

    • @danilolabbate
      @danilolabbate Год назад +1

      Indeed, major problem is debt, and on this issue both Lula and Bolsonaro have been disastrous.

    • @Vaeldarg
      @Vaeldarg Год назад +3

      As someone with indirect interest in Brazil, due to having family there, the detail about Bolsonaro filling his administration with military-associated picks.....kinda shows how it couldn't really be let to "play out", as mentioned in the video. Bolsonaro's endgame was the same reason his camp's trying to play to the military to do a coup now: his post-reelection term would've focused on keeping himself from needing to leave power.

    • @IuryRates
      @IuryRates Год назад

      Piada de mal gosto falar que gastamos 50% do orçamento com juros, metade da arrecadação vem de emitir nova dívida, se você corta o pagamento da dívida você também corta a emissão de novas dívidas, como o país você em déficit ele quebraria imediatamente

    • @hellenmoreira9991
      @hellenmoreira9991 Год назад

      @@IuryRates daqui a pouco vem o grafico de pizza kkkk

    • @mojewjewjew4420
      @mojewjewjew4420 Год назад

      @@Vaeldarg based Bolsonaro.

  • @felipenachmanowicz9393
    @felipenachmanowicz9393 Год назад +72

    One important thing to note about Brazil's unemployment figures: IBGE changed their methodology to calculate unemployment just recently. You can't really do an apples to apples comparison like that.

    • @felipenachmanowicz9393
      @felipenachmanowicz9393 Год назад +23

      You also failed to mention that the judge was considered biased against him. As we saw with the Vaza Jato scandal, where is communications on Telegram were leaked.

    • @GregoXWK4225
      @GregoXWK4225 Год назад

      @@felipenachmanowicz9393 He was convicted by 2 dozen judges, and the proofs are there for any honest person to see. Billions in bribe money were returned to the state. Now this money will have to be returned to the corrupt thieves.

    • @felipenachmanowicz9393
      @felipenachmanowicz9393 Год назад

      @@GregoXWK4225 what proof? They couldnt even prove that the apartment was his. Let alone that he stole billions.
      And btw, the witness against him couldnt be a witness since he was in a delação premiada program.

    • @claudiofranceschi3416
      @claudiofranceschi3416 Год назад +19

      @@felipenachmanowicz9393 He is reading a script made for liberal guys.

    • @WilliamSantos-cv8rr
      @WilliamSantos-cv8rr Год назад +11

      No, it was not. The method was rearranged in the last year of Lula's mandate. That was his secret miracle for having high employment rates when GFC hit Brazil so he could elect Dilma.

  • @neygomestube
    @neygomestube Год назад +5

    As a Brazilian who has lived under Bolsonaro's government, I am almost outraged by your view in this video. I understand that you are liberal-oriented on economic grounds, but to find Paulo Guedes's programs positive for my country, you need to be a little cynical. Bolsonaro will pass in history as the worse president we have had; an antidemocratic man, homophobic, misogynistic, racist and evil person. His government was four years of a nightmare...

  • @MarceloReis1
    @MarceloReis1 Год назад +4

    Your GDP growth numbers are highly deceiving as they come after a massive GDP plunge. 10% growth after a 10% drop is not a zero sum.

    • @user-mo8br5sc2o
      @user-mo8br5sc2o Год назад +1

      Agreed this channel is just pro privatization propaganda

  • @ProfessorHenrique2024
    @ProfessorHenrique2024 Год назад +17

    Lula's sentence wasn't just annulled because of a ''technically'', the judge who enacted the decision was considered impartial by the supreme court. And to the surprise of no one the same judge, Sergio Moro, is now a Senator campaining agains't Lula and the workers party. The sentence was political from her inception and offered no proof of any wrong doings on Lula's part. I expected better from this channel.

    • @gabriela.7422
      @gabriela.7422 Год назад +4

      And just a few of the processes expired, most were dismissed for lacking fundament and evidence

    • @WaOk2018
      @WaOk2018 6 месяцев назад

      Gadão, Lula foi preso porque é um corrupto, e ele falou "eu tenho que fμder esse Moro". Isso não é motivo pro Moro ser contra ele? E fora que o Moro hoje virou aliado do Dino kkkkkkkkk

  • @hughjass1044
    @hughjass1044 Год назад +13

    Bolsonaro, Lula,..... what's the difference? Brazil, like nearly all of Latin America, is a slow moving train wreck on auto-replay. Wild swings right followed by wild swings left but the results never change.

    • @ArturVarejao
      @ArturVarejao Год назад +2

      Not like that. Brazil from today is much better than the one from 90s not all countries in the world are USA or west Europe.

  • @menumlor9432
    @menumlor9432 Год назад +20

    In Afghanistan you just blow shit up to end a govt. 🤣

    • @agbottan
      @agbottan Год назад +4

      We need to take some lessons with them.

  • @kelnnerf
    @kelnnerf Год назад +18

    That is a great video, however, there are many points that you maybe should review it:
    1) About the 4 years of Bolsonaro’s Government, there was an amazing cut on many social and environmental areas, some of those cuts stopped the flow of international supportive money into the country, the most notorious being the Amazonia founding;
    2) A lol of the money destined to country management went, under Bolsonaro, to approval schemes to allow his government. The scheme was voted recently by the Brazilian Supreme Court illegal and the expectation is that those governmental moves will not be allowed during Lula’s New Term;
    3) The ETs request from Bolsonaro supporters actually happened and in some of the videos they are using their phones for such a step. So it was not a media game, but rather a true approach that just increased the ridicule added by the request for a military coup (with them camping in front of military bases) and the non-existent Communist threat they claim it was a constant around Lula, when so many parties from left and right joined forces to support Lula’s elections. By the way, all those e topics happened AFTER the election.
    4) Brazilian economy might have increased a bit, but unfortunately in a very messy and unsustainable way. The actual support created for Bolsonaro’s re-election, created a debt of such a proportion, there was no money to pay anyone by year end. The new elected Government was the one actually already working to make that happened, since Bolsonaro completely withdrawn from government since the election;
    5) Unfortunately not all about a country is its economy. And even though Bolsonaro and Paulo Guedes failed horribly during their 4 years tenure, the real impact from that Government is on the social side of the country: Poverty increased immensely since Bolsonaro went to power, mishandled of the pandemic and issues with a vaccination program, return of eradicated diseases since the Health Ministry had one of the worst run in decades. No vaccination programs, no prevention programs.
    So no, we do not really think Bolsonaro should get back to a second term, and honestly, we hope he never come back to politics in the country, as he runaway yesterday, scared of the many crimes he committed during his term and that will be persecuted.

    • @aquillateixeira2270
      @aquillateixeira2270 Год назад +5

      Those informations you provided are biased and arguably false.
      The Federal government increased the Bolsa Familia Program vastly. This measure, as well as others, led to the LOWEST extreme poverty rate in recent history. (Source: World Bank)
      Environmental regulations in Brazil are not only strict, they are also crazy. Which leaves room for public agents to have discretion as to fine and punish people - increasing the possibility of corruption.
      The handling of the economy and pandemic is object of stir debate. But Brazil hasn’t had a significantly higher COVID deaths/population ratio than UK or Argentina (which had 8 months of strict lockdown and an enormous increase in poverty rates, with Leftist president Fernandez).
      Also, it is important to say that “Secret Budget” was created and approved by Brazilian parliament. It REDUCED president’s discretion over the nations’s budget. Something that gives a hint on why the Supreme Court ruled it illegal less than 1 month until Bolsonaro’s term is finished.
      It’s misleading to treat supporters of economic freedom as radicals. Because not all Leftist supporters are land invaders, protest burning buses, or loot supermarkets and stores. Some are, others are not. Very inaccurate to make statements like the ones you did.

    • @oole0111
      @oole0111 Год назад +2

      @@aquillateixeira2270 Sometimes i think "Does all leftists lack moral and smartness?" and then, every time, i see biased comments like Kelnner Franca's made, so i conclude, if it's not all, it's a large majority.

    • @hellenmoreira9991
      @hellenmoreira9991 Год назад +2

      seu comentário é um desserviço, apenas

    • @sparking023
      @sparking023 Год назад

      "We" nah man, *you*
      unfortunatelly, we can't have it so that only the voters of Lula have to deal with the consequences of his leadership, because this is a "democracy"

    • @alekzandah360
      @alekzandah360 Год назад +1

      Juro que perdi uns dez neurônios lendo essa excrescência

  • @cacosartto
    @cacosartto Год назад +20

    Suggestion for Visual politiks - make a video about the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court. That will be fun. Hire me for fact checking before releasing it 🤣

    • @ConradOS100
      @ConradOS100 Год назад +3

      Xandão is watching 👁️👁️🥚

    • @danilolabbate
      @danilolabbate Год назад

      Too complicated for a 15 minutes video. Hell, too complicated even for an hour long documentary. =D

    • @eduardocajias5626
      @eduardocajias5626 Год назад

      @@ConradOS100 Is he watching a... Spanish RUclips vídeo in English?!

    • @luxtherealdeal
      @luxtherealdeal Год назад

      Xandão!

  • @MarceloReis1
    @MarceloReis1 Год назад +5

    Lula was released because the judge in charge of his case was highly biased and playing along with the promoter. Thar same judge later became Bolsonaro's Justice Minister expecting a spot in the Supreme Court that was ultimately denied as he considered going after the Family Bolsonaro for multiple crimes.
    The shallow exposition of this video is very troublesome.

    • @ernestkhalimov1007
      @ernestkhalimov1007 Год назад +1

      Moros position was only denied when Glenn Greenwald exposed him in leaked phone calls of him coordinating the prosecution which is illegal
      The corruption was so naked Bolsonaro had to deny the promotion because of public backlash

    • @WaOk2018
      @WaOk2018 6 месяцев назад

      Que crimes, gadão? E o Lula é inocente? kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

    • @MarceloReis1
      @MarceloReis1 6 месяцев назад

      @@WaOk2018 Não faz diferença se Lula é inocente. Até que seja julgado por um Juiz idôneo, eu acredito que sim. Da mesma que Bolsonaro é inocente até julgado culpado. Eu tenho as minhas opiniões de que obviamente Bolsonaro é um criminoso num grau muito mais extremo e perigoso que Lula jamais possa ter sido, mas eu não sou o Juiz que vai definir isso.

  • @kirankumarsukumar
    @kirankumarsukumar Год назад +19

    Brazil is pedalling backwards

  • @seeingtheforest9529
    @seeingtheforest9529 Год назад +16

    So, 50.7% for Lula means a deeply "divided" country, but 51.9% for Brexit was a resounding endorsement by the people! 😂

    • @sadambalaamin315
      @sadambalaamin315 Год назад

      🇼 🇭 🇦 🇹 🇸 🇦 🇵 🇵 🇲 🇪💘💘💘

  • @Hobbsdad
    @Hobbsdad Год назад +57

    What Brazil and most of the world for that matter need is a government that's going to put the people ahead of big business and kickbacks

    • @eduardocajias5626
      @eduardocajias5626 Год назад

      This (that you wrote) is TOTALLY against of Bolsonaro's - and his three politicians sons - interests!

    • @ConradOS100
      @ConradOS100 Год назад +7

      Bolsonaro is ally of big business. Lula is in favor of society were big business can have their share but common people must have a decent life

    • @bravonetgmail7662
      @bravonetgmail7662 Год назад

      Bolsonaro did it. Lula wants to keep big companies supplying corrupt money and giving back misery. Like Venezuela, Argentina, Bolívia, etcc

    • @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993
      @mikolowiskamikolowiska4993 Год назад +6

      Govt will never solve any problem. Never has. Never will.

    • @danilolabbate
      @danilolabbate Год назад +11

      Strongly disagree. What we need is PRAGMATISM. We need someone who knows money is limited and knows how to create jobs - the opposite of what Lula is.
      We don't need "people before business". We need businesses to freaking work, so people can get jobs or create companies. We need a judicial system that actually works, as people in Brazil simply doesn't trust it at all. And, that's the most important part, we need to create wealth before we talk about sharing jt.
      Before Bolsonaro, Lula's party has been in office for FOURTEEN YEARS using this empty "we have to share" speach. The result has been a total economical disaster and massive debt for the next 20+ years.

  • @luizpaulosantosribeiro9005
    @luizpaulosantosribeiro9005 Год назад +25

    Let's not forget that Lula's campaign adds always featured "plead innocent by the supreme court", which is a lie. Meanwhile the court's also forbade anyone to call Lula a former inmate, which is a fact. Courts were really biased on what was or not allowed this election.

    • @Silverbolt90
      @Silverbolt90 Год назад

      Yeah, but was he guilty?

    • @luizpaulosantosribeiro9005
      @luizpaulosantosribeiro9005 Год назад +10

      @@Silverbolt90 According to the three instances that judged the case? Yes. Honestly I don't know how you could frame spending time at a rural mansion decorated with your family stuff and owned by the company who gets the most government contracts as anything but corruption. It not being his is part of the problem.

    • @bielhelp
      @bielhelp Год назад +1

      @@Silverbolt90 He wasn't. He is innocent.

    • @andrenicodemus
      @andrenicodemus Год назад

      @@luizpaulosantosribeiro9005 there was no proof of him possessing neither the Guarujá or the Atibaia properties. He is innocent. His trials were annulled.
      It’s more than being plead innocent, to the face of law he is not considered to ever being guilty.
      So yes, he shouldn’t be called a former inmate because he is actually a former political prisoner.

    • @luizpaulosantosribeiro9005
      @luizpaulosantosribeiro9005 Год назад +7

      @@andrenicodemus he was not plead innocent. The supreme court changed their decision that the Court in Curitiba should be in charge of the judgment, and now the crimes expired and can no longer be judge. The bullshit of Moro being bias is nonsensical given that he was further plead guilty by other 2 higher courts and in most cases they gave harsher sentences than Moro.
      And him not owning the properties doesn't proof anything because, unless you believe the company with the most government contracts would let the former president use their estate in a permanent fashion free of charge as well as doing expensive reforms for him, the properties were payment for corrupt and therefore could not be in his name. You know, because you can't just put on your tax forms giant estate acquisitions without an origin?! The process let it clear that he was the one using and managing the properties.

  • @lucVR01
    @lucVR01 Год назад +32

    Congratulations on the great explanation of Brazil’s political situation. We are currently very divided between two populist figures who are not at all concerned with what is best for the country. I’m afraid we’re heading the same direction as our argentine neighbors in the south.

    • @RodrigoFranca4
      @RodrigoFranca4 Год назад +1

      There you go. Greetings from Brazil kk

    • @felipenachmanowicz9393
      @felipenachmanowicz9393 Год назад +4

      False simmetry

    • @GregoXWK4225
      @GregoXWK4225 Год назад

      No matter who is up against Lula. He will always be depicted as evil and fascist.

    • @chris0000924
      @chris0000924 Год назад +5

      Wow you assume lulas results are legitimate

  • @winstonmaraj8029
    @winstonmaraj8029 Год назад +91

    Poor Brazil, not sure what it was, is nor want to be. As a former British Ambassador said of it,
    'Brazil is what the US would have been if the South had won the American Civil War.'
    I love it as I have brothers and sisters there, but Brazil ain't ever gonna a make it, trust me.Much love tho and all the very best.

    • @Trinitypater
      @Trinitypater Год назад +8

      You are so right!

    • @mikepants3736
      @mikepants3736 Год назад +1

      It’s a mentality of slavery and oppression, that makes the people look for a grand saviour, instead of working hard to achieve their own goals. People in Brazil have been taught for decades that they are helpless against America and Europe, therefore placing their faith in men who are their real oppressors.

    • @scpatl4now
      @scpatl4now Год назад +27

      'Brazil is what the US would have been if the South had won the American Civil War.'
      I've never heard that...but it makes perfect sense as someone from the American South.

    • @gorebello
      @gorebello Год назад +17

      As a brazilian I can say that there is no discussion about long term plans. Industrialization doesn't even appear on the mídia or elections.

    • @Borzogo
      @Borzogo Год назад

      Unless, of course, rich countries start bombing each other again. Then Brazil can pull the same shit the US pulled after WWII.

  • @LuizBarros99
    @LuizBarros99 Год назад +28

    "Haddad is a choice from the MODERATE left"
    Are you SURE?!
    He was literally the worst mayor from São Paulo's history, not to mention that the thesis from his Master's degree in economics was literally about the SUCCESS of the Soviet Union's economy!
    His thesis was presented in 1990, and a few months later the Soviet Union collapsed due to its economical disaster! And the only criticisms he presented towards the Soviet economy was that it was too despotic of a regime (if he had not made that criticism, it would have made his true opinion as explicit as his political party open support of left wing dictatorships in Latin America such as Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Cuba... But according to the left, the authoritarian is Jair Bolsonaro...)

    • @pablobomgiorno8273
      @pablobomgiorno8273 Год назад +1

      @André Barbosa
      Você entendeu o ponto, amigão. Haddad não tem NADA de "moderado" dentro da esquerda.

  • @tvismyonlyfriend
    @tvismyonlyfriend Год назад +10

    When I visited Brazil in 2020 I went to see some culture, I saw some great tourism I saw environment at the forefront it's hard to not be taken in by how many trees are in Brazil. I have a husband that is Pakistani and I have been there before in 2016. They both have very large populations. Brazil is a great partner as they have a large commodities market

  • @ArturVarejao
    @ArturVarejao Год назад +4

    Industry has not gone so down like you posted, it's still around 25%

  • @marcobonesi6794
    @marcobonesi6794 Год назад +73

    so he basically wants to worsen the situation by spending even more more and cause even more inflation.I guess he wants to repeat his last performance with the balance sheets of petrobras.

    • @paulogabriel4136
      @paulogabriel4136 Год назад +14

      Make Odebrecht great again

    • @Tespri
      @Tespri Год назад +4

      Visual politics isn't really that smart when it comes to understanding economic policies and their long term effects.

    • @znth-gameworks
      @znth-gameworks Год назад +1

      You don`t seem to understand public spending.

    • @Tespri
      @Tespri Год назад +6

      @@znth-gameworks we do, it leads to inflation and artificial rise of GDP that is not based on true numbers.

    • @znth-gameworks
      @znth-gameworks Год назад +3

      @@Tespri that is not how it works, you're basing yourself on old orthodox theory instead of something of more substance. I get it, you probably don't come from an econ background, but repeating old adages instead of informing yourself and researching before speaking publicly is, as the kids say, cringe AF

  • @haoxus9413
    @haoxus9413 Год назад +10

    I hope those people won't regret, when Brazil become Venezuela

    • @joshsilva6450
      @joshsilva6450 Год назад +4

      lol... well, funny enough, Bolsonaro did wanted something from Venezuela in Brazil... remember? to increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court (if he was elected) and since he would have the right to appoint a number of them, this new Supreme Court would have a majority of conservative judges who would favour his policies... just like Chavez/Maduro did in Venezuela...

  • @tylerbozinovski427
    @tylerbozinovski427 Год назад +2

    "Lula wants the state to be a driving force behind the economy." So, literal socialism? I bet that won't come back to hurt the Brazilian people even more, right?

    • @rodrigoalvespacheco6178
      @rodrigoalvespacheco6178 Год назад +2

      Not really, Its more like a keynesianism, or attempt for a social welfare state
      But reality imposes itself, Brazil is far away from Socialismo, even by his hands, he is not that strong anymore

    • @hellenmoreira9991
      @hellenmoreira9991 Год назад

      something like what they did in Argentina

    • @tylerbozinovski427
      @tylerbozinovski427 Год назад

      @@rodrigoalvespacheco6178 Keynesianism in effect is still incredibly similar to socialism. And just as flawed I must say.

  • @gugaemc
    @gugaemc Год назад +3

    Oh, man. So much misinformation in this video.

  • @Theziz8
    @Theziz8 Год назад +25

    You guys are liberal, and it shows.

    • @bigmekboy175
      @bigmekboy175 Год назад

      This would be a big nope from me. They're far too capitalistic and anti government control to be considered even slightly liberal. They're closer to Libertarian than anything else.

    • @thorpeaaron1110
      @thorpeaaron1110 Год назад +3

      Your just realizing that now?

    • @Theziz8
      @Theziz8 Год назад

      @@thorpeaaron1110 No, I just decided to say it now

    • @Big_Black_Dick
      @Big_Black_Dick Год назад

      😂 yeah u can tell by the fact that they are fake news lol

    • @xyz-uw3ps
      @xyz-uw3ps Год назад +2

      So?

  • @shanenelson3825
    @shanenelson3825 Год назад +2

    If one is released from prison and wins the President's seat and losing both houses it sounds very shady

    • @natanielzanferrari1130
      @natanielzanferrari1130 Год назад

      It doesn't when there are mutilple parties. It is Brazilian Politics 101: voters don't vote for parties, voters vote for the guy.

    • @shanenelson3825
      @shanenelson3825 Год назад +1

      @@natanielzanferrari1130 I'm sure American CIA was never in on any of this behavior. America is wonderful ans sinless. Congrats

    • @natanielzanferrari1130
      @natanielzanferrari1130 Год назад

      @@shanenelson3825 actually there were suspicions of CIA meddling, but for the other side, dude. The winners believe in a strong state-owned oil company, the defeated believe in selling the oil reserves to foreign companies. Guess which one CIA would love. You are having some right Thoughts, but lacking context

    • @RobertGames2030
      @RobertGames2030 Год назад

      😰😰😰

  • @Thvndar
    @Thvndar Год назад +1

    IMO when Bolsonaro appointed one of the Chicago boys, he immediately lost any credibility.

  • @m.g.8897
    @m.g.8897 Год назад +21

    Best foreginer video about Brazil that i saw. Its allways a "Save the Amazon from this fascist"

    • @RobertGames2030
      @RobertGames2030 Год назад +2

      Recorde de Desmatamento na Amazônia agora em Fevereiro🤡. Foi culpa do "Facista" ?

    • @m.g.8897
      @m.g.8897 Год назад +3

      @@RobertGames2030 acho que você não entendeu meu comentario

    • @RobertGames2030
      @RobertGames2030 Год назад +1

      @@m.g.8897 🤔

  • @senhoradosarcasmo
    @senhoradosarcasmo Год назад +1

    By getting back to his partnership with the president of Venezuela 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @make-og4xm
    @make-og4xm Год назад +1

    The poorest in last 50 years. That is Brazil Bolsonaro let for Lula.

  • @joaofrancisco7289
    @joaofrancisco7289 Год назад +1

    Here’s the trick… Lula won’t end Bolsonaros Brazil.

  • @vinicius464able
    @vinicius464able Год назад +9

    I don't know from where you live, but here in Brazil fiscal reform is read as "tax increase".

    • @znth-gameworks
      @znth-gameworks Год назад +2

      Lol, nope.
      Please, read the proposed plan before saying something like this. The plan is to switch from a model in which the majority of taxes comes from goods and services to one in which dividends and income are the backbone of the fiscal profile of the Brazilian state

    • @MarcosPaulo-tr7mm
      @MarcosPaulo-tr7mm Год назад +1

      tu não faz ideia doq tá falando

  • @kamikaze5528
    @kamikaze5528 Год назад +9

    So many misconceptions on the video.
    As for what will happen, Brazil will turn into another Venezuela, the economy will go die in a ditch.
    Corruption will skyrocket (at his winning speech, there was a guy who was arrested trying to entre the country with illegally obtained dollars in his underwear, just for starters).
    Citizens' rights will be curbed, there is already talks of enforcing stricter gun control, whereas Bolsonaro's gov't managed to lax it a bit. Back in the 90's and early 2000's it was easier to get a gun than it was in the U.S., then Lula in his first stint antidemocratically made it almost illegal.
    We're completely screwed and so many morons are laughing...

  • @davidaminelli
    @davidaminelli Год назад +2

    Minute 2:11
    The name of the fomer president is Fernando Henrique Cardoso, FHC. Spelled with an "H". Portuguese, not Spanish.
    Love the videos, btw

  • @hnozima
    @hnozima Год назад +4

    I think both partisans of Lula and Bolsonaro will get mad when they see this video. What means you made a good job. That being said, both of them are a disgrace to Brazil. I don’t see any solution to our actual problems.

  • @MANIVANNAN94
    @MANIVANNAN94 Год назад +1

    just like Venezuela Brazil would fall 🚶🏻🚶🏻🚶🏻..

  • @dsansil
    @dsansil Год назад +2

    This is SOOOO biased. Its seems like you interviewed bolsonaro himself to make this video...Shame

  • @OdawaTraveler
    @OdawaTraveler Год назад +1

    This is not neutral coverage. Words have meaning and you choose yours wisely.

  • @leonardomontibeller1009
    @leonardomontibeller1009 Год назад +3

    Just an small correction in 2:12 his name is Fernando H. Cardoso not Fernando E. Cardoso.

  • @danielabetts
    @danielabetts Год назад +5

    If Brazil invests in its people, who are diverse and extremely creative, the country would soar. The problem is that traditional industries in the country are devoted to extraction of natural resources at a low cost and at the expense of the environment and workers. Lula brings an important change in tone and philosophy. I have high hopes for Brazil.

  • @jeffbrown3051
    @jeffbrown3051 Год назад +2

    Bolsinaro was doing a good job. He should come back.

  • @gabsinventions9135
    @gabsinventions9135 Год назад +8

    Bolsonaro had not done auxílio brasil nor raised it.
    The congress and the parlament did it.
    And they have done that gaist Bolsonaro's political will.
    It's true that Brasil had small economic boom in the last couple of years but very little of it has to do with the federal policies promoted by his party.

    • @droydi
      @droydi Год назад +1

      Don't expect those aligned with the plan to speak out against it. "You will own nothing, and you will be happy." - Hopefully those who are paying attention are learning how to be self sovereign.

    • @patrickaccioly4398
      @patrickaccioly4398 Год назад

      That’s a lie. He has to sign the bill, and he did it. And the congress would try to raise it regardless if he initially proposed 600 or not, just to not give him credit.

    • @gabsinventions9135
      @gabsinventions9135 Год назад

      @@patrickaccioly4398 singing a bill does not make that his policie.
      Nor involves him or his party with it's creation.
      And on top os that Bolsonaro did sing against the Bill twice, and hi only sing it in favor on the third time cus after the third denail we have ways to aproove law without the president signed.
      Not to mention that hi did not try raise the support money that was once again the congress.
      That's not to say the government has not done anything. It has mostly it in for of tributary reforms like the videos says.

  • @akshaysajeev4787
    @akshaysajeev4787 Год назад +3

    Just a small correction India crossed uk to be the fifth largest economy in the world .I have seen that in your chart UK was ranked 5th

  • @SingerDanielLil
    @SingerDanielLil Год назад +5

    You told, like any other media, that Bolsonaro is a "populist", but people elected the most populist of our time, Lula. Search for his presidency in the past, he created all that.

  • @benghazi4216
    @benghazi4216 Год назад +24

    The problem is not spending what you don't have. That is how countries work.
    The problem is that a leader convicted on corruption charges is presenting an 32,4 billion dollar investment scheme...

    • @Bolsonaro_em_Haia
      @Bolsonaro_em_Haia Год назад

      Bolsonaro is definitely much worse, though. And the level of irregularities in the processes against Lula is astounding. To this day no one can even point out where the evidence can be found in the text.

    • @opedroefeio
      @opedroefeio Год назад +1

      What about the over 100 real estate properties Bolsonaro and his family (which for some reason are all in his government) have bought using cash? Lula is not perfect and not clean, but Bolsonaro makes him look like a saint by comparison.

    • @Bolsonaro_em_Haia
      @Bolsonaro_em_Haia Год назад +1

      @@opedroefeio Very, very true indeed.

    • @greg2502
      @greg2502 Год назад

      You clearly don't understand the difference between government./business and home economics. ....

    • @AVAtistar
      @AVAtistar Год назад

      Don't forget the fact that Bolsonaro was fighting the drug cartels while lula works for them.

  • @johnrosue9299
    @johnrosue9299 Год назад +17

    Brazil had the most promising economy in South America by the end of the century until Lula came with the promises of Socialism then that dream ended.
    It's easier to go down than up. Bolzanaro has the right idea but it would take his successors to continue....and Lula is back in. It's said that people are the architects of their own hell and this shows.

    • @claudiofranceschi3416
      @claudiofranceschi3416 Год назад +4

      Brazil was getting money from MIF to pay its debits in end of century with high depreciation of currency , which promising economy? are you nuts?

    • @decisiveliberty
      @decisiveliberty Год назад +2

      Under their present Constitution (of which there have been 8) Bolsonaro would have to form a new government - not a good time to be doing this as their Congress has 67%+ of their members facing corruption charges or have been charged already. If the military steps up, then it would be an ideal time to write a new Constitution but it would have to reduce taxes, provided a checks and balances among the 3 branches of government, and give the people the power they should have in the first place. Without doing this the ONLY way Brazil will make it whether Bolsonaro or Lula is a revolt from the people. We don't see that happening, the people are too passive even in this political climate... Not taking away from what they are doing now but they have shown a dependency on waiting for someone else to take action before they do...
      Reply

    • @CristianeBrasil-ul1nr
      @CristianeBrasil-ul1nr Год назад

      ​@@decisivelibertynossa...se pelo menos "The people" tivesse alguma relação com quem é eleito para o legislativo

  • @MarceloNunesPOA
    @MarceloNunesPOA Год назад +4

    Quite accurate, but a few corrections are needed.(1) Auxílio Brazil and Bolsa Família are exactly the same program that has been around since the times of president Cardoso. Each new president just revamp the same program to its own credit. (2) Geraldo Alckmin is a Fabian Socialist, rooted on Bernard Shaw and HGWells. Doesn’t look very Center-right to me.(3) Haddad is a University Professor whose PhD thesis is about the glories of Stalinism, the cultural revolution od Antonio Gramschi and the Frankfurt School, and all those extreme-left conspiracy theory that even the most Radical European socialists would deny to death! I think even Lula is more moderate than him!

    • @claudiofranceschi3416
      @claudiofranceschi3416 Год назад +1

      The most import you have even mentioned.: Bolsa paid U$400,00 is an error. Bolsa Familia has consolidated several Federal programs for poor people, but it was not best Lulas realization.

    • @patrickaccioly4398
      @patrickaccioly4398 Год назад

      Exactly. These a important points.

  • @andrenicodemus
    @andrenicodemus Год назад +4

    I can see you guys at VisualPolitik got a lot of things right in this video, but it would be nice if your sources were less biased, especially when it comes to explaining the whole Lula imprisonment story.
    Yes, at the end of the day, the “reason” his trial was annulled was that technically the case was investigating corruption on Petrobras and Lula’s supposed “””crime””” - yes, with multiple air quotes, had nothing to do with Petrobras.
    Now to the point of his sentence. Lula was sentenced guilty for receiving bribes from a construction firm. The problems there were:
    - there was absolutely no proof of him receiving any bribes. During the investigation, the prosecutor famously said “I don’t have proof, but I’m convinced…”
    - talking about the prosecutor, it was later found that the team of prosecutors in charge of the case were not only trying to find ways to involve Lula themselves (clearly showing their goal was political repression), but also arranging with the judge of the case what kind of “evidence” they could present so that he would consider Lula guilty.
    - coincidently, Lula was arrested a few months prior to the 2018 presidential elections, and, as soon as Bolsonaro was elected, Sérgio Moro (the same judge that arranged Lula’s conviction with the prosecutors) was named the “Super” Minister of Justice on Bolsonaro’s government.
    This is a very very summary of the situation, but I think it is important that you realize that it’s not worth jeopardizing a country’s democracy for some presumably good results on the economy. People kill each other by following this coward fascist bunch that, finally, were kicked out of power - and are now running away from the country like cockroaches running away from light to avoid paying for all the crimes they committed, especially in relation to letting COVID run loose and kill hundreds of thousands of people.

    • @danilolabbate
      @danilolabbate Год назад

      Sorry dude, they got more than 3000 evidences against Lula and both his condemnations have been CONFIRMED by other judges.
      Not only that, it has been broadcasted LIVE on TV, Lula had the best lawyers money can buy and his defense was a complete fiasco.
      Thecnicalities may have freed him, but he got arrested because of his own doings.

    • @andrenicodemus
      @andrenicodemus Год назад +1

      @@danilolabbate no no, not 3000 evidences. 3000 “convicções”. Just read the sentence and tell anyone where there is 1 single proof. It’s as simples as that, there is not 1 single proof against him, I challenge you to give any proof.

    • @danilolabbate
      @danilolabbate Год назад +2

      @@andrenicodemus Read the original processes, both of them. It's all there for everyone to see.
      Also, read both the CONFIRMATIONS, as Lula has been condemned in two different judicial tribunals both times. Unanimously. LIVE. Having very, very expensive lawyers on his side.
      Lula's mindless followers love to say it was all a simple judge's fault, due to his magical powers or something, but Lula's condemnations were long, exhausting processes, which followed every step required by law.
      Interesting fact, most of his allies were arrested too. Jose Dirceu, Antonio Palocci, José Genoino, Vaccari, Delcidio, Odebrecht, Leo Pinheiro, Eike Batista, the list just goes on and on. But the strange fact is, for some reason Lula's mindless followers only believe HIS arrest would be unlawful.

    • @m.g.8897
      @m.g.8897 Год назад

      Lol, you call the video biased but wrote this absurd.
      Its just facts: Lula was charged for corruption; Lula is associated with the FARCs; Nicolas Maduro will come to Brazil to meet Lula tomorrow (01/01/2023); Tomorrow also the tax limit on Gasoline aproved by Bolsonaro will fade bc Lula did not reaproved it, so Gas will rise to 7,00 R$; Lula economic politics are pure trash; Lula is the true fascist, he literally support Latin America Dictators and is against freedom of speak; And much more, i can make a list of 10000 words.

    • @andrenicodemus
      @andrenicodemus Год назад

      @@m.g.8897 LOL

  • @Andrelucioliveira
    @Andrelucioliveira 2 месяца назад

    The correct translation for the excerpt from Bolsonaro's speech at the minute (4:35) is "agents of the workers' party". Because he says "petralhada" which is a nickname used to designate politicians from the workers' party, LULA's party.

  • @sebastianwrites
    @sebastianwrites Год назад

    We don't know what you mean when the popup appears telling us: Bolsonaro raises Auxilio Brasil from $400 to $600... what is this a benefit? You give "no" explanation of this whatsoever?
    What is "Auxilio Brasil" you don't tell us?!?

  • @zemaurocubas6460
    @zemaurocubas6460 6 месяцев назад

    Just to add information: the “thecnical” thing in the process the released Lula was that the judge was combining with the prosecutors of the court the way “proves” should be produced and even sometimes created and released to the media.

  • @gorebello
    @gorebello Год назад +8

    As a Brazilian I can agree that the video anaysis was a sober one

  • @fernandobernardin
    @fernandobernardin Год назад +1

    I am brazilian and this vídeo got a lot of things wrong...

  • @stephenoakden7585
    @stephenoakden7585 Год назад +3

    Guys I have supported this channel for some years now (from Australia). I am frustrated by this new iteration. One thing that appears a constant with you guys is the inability to correctly pronounce non Anglo place and personal names. I feel this particularly in this vid, having lived for some time in Brazil. Really a little more research on pronunciation would keep your channel more relevant in the interconnected world in which we live, and be more respectful. Cheers Steve

    • @danilolabbate
      @danilolabbate Год назад

      Brazilian here, and honestly, I don't think that's an issue.
      Accents do exist, and it's expected for foreigners to say our names in a different way.
      It's the same when Brazilian news casters try to pronounce some foreign names, sometimes they get it right, sometimes they don't.
      Maybe it would be nice to have a better pronunciation, but I don't think it's an issue.

  • @alexdesousa7966
    @alexdesousa7966 Год назад +4

    Excellent video, but in here you have failed to point out Bolsonaro's connection to organised crime.

  • @Sidneivsj
    @Sidneivsj Год назад +5

    The question is: how a corrupt mindset can improve people's lives? Corruption is the main issue here in Brazil. Haddad was the worst Sao Paulo's mayor. Check it out.

  • @sandervr10
    @sandervr10 Год назад +5

    Economic growth with loans will kill everything in the end ... Small Business or compleet country s in the end you're spending all your money on loan payments and is there nothing left... only loans

    • @Tespri
      @Tespri Год назад +1

      And this is politics that visual politics advocates. Debt slavery

    • @daegrun
      @daegrun Год назад

      You realize… all successful businesses use loans? It’s just a better deal. It matters though how it is spent if will produce benefit.
      But since you are against that I suppose the former and current president you both dislike equally because of it. ^^

  • @michaelzlprime
    @michaelzlprime Год назад +1

    Seems like brazil is going down the drain, on the same path as Venezuela.
    more reckless socialist gov spending, and a spiral of debt

  • @news26boom
    @news26boom Год назад +10

    Brazilians, DO NOT give up your guns!

    • @puraLusa
      @puraLusa Год назад +4

      They already did, hence why the criminals are ones who have them.
      Also, brazil has way more and profound problems than gun laws.

    • @decisiveliberty
      @decisiveliberty Год назад +3

      @@puraLusa - those can be resolved down the road, however once any people give up their guns then only the government has guns... the history of Cuba, Venezuela, India, Cambodia, China, Germany have already proved this.

  • @victormendes6873
    @victormendes6873 Год назад +3

    You forgot to mention that the number of people without any food to eat has reached an all time high at 33 million people

    • @nelsonluisfreire8969
      @nelsonluisfreire8969 Год назад

      Nonsense and propaganda from the left. Travel within Brazil. You will not find a number even close to that number. Starvation is used as an impact figure to mislead minds. Poverty yes. But the rest is Propaganda

    • @victormendes6873
      @victormendes6873 Год назад

      @@nelsonluisfreire8969 you can walk down any street in Brazil and see how many more beggars and homeless people there are now starving compared to ten years ago. Just because it’s not convenient to the right’s delusions doesn’t mean it’s a lie

    • @nelsonluisfreire8969
      @nelsonluisfreire8969 Год назад

      @@victormendes6873
      Really? This speech again? The number of beggars raised? Is this an official number? Your speech is just a narrative. Without numbers it's just ideology. Your impressions are sided with your ideology. Reality us expressed in numbers, not your single view

    • @kingdedede333
      @kingdedede333 Год назад

      This is a neo-liberal propaganda channel... You think they care about people starving?

    • @nelsonluisfreire8969
      @nelsonluisfreire8969 Год назад

      @@kingdedede333
      Your comment shows no arguments. This number is not related to starvation. Is related to "fear" of starvation, as the pool was carefully written by leftists with no intention to bring the truth. Just propaganda

  • @danielasheehan7850
    @danielasheehan7850 Год назад

    Thanks!

  • @leonardo.rosa.youtube
    @leonardo.rosa.youtube Год назад +5

    I am Brazilian. And you did a very good Video! There are some missing points though. The Supreme Court is censoring many - even Congressmen.
    One Member of the Supreme Court - called Toffoli - was the Worker's Party lawyer. Back in 2019, Marcelo Odebrecht told the nickname "o amigo do amigo de meu pai", on Odebrecht documents referred to Toffoli. When that happened, Toffoli opened a Case that gives the Brazilian Supreme Court status of Investigator, Prosecutor, Judge and Victim.
    The Brazilian Constitution does not allow that. Only the Senate can stop the Supreme Court. But most Senators have Corruption Cases in the hands of the Supreme Court.
    In the sequence, Toffoli gives this Unconstitutional Cass to Alexandre de Moraes. The wife of the later has a business partner that was responsible for Lula's Election Campaign. Result: Moraes started to censor many people. That includes Congressmen.
    The Supreme Court also asked Lula to propose a Law in order to legalize the Censorship. Lula government already started to organize themselves for that. They will have an Entity to monitor Social Media.
    Right now, the Censorship continues. There are Journalists leaving Brazil, for criticizing Lula and the Brazilian Supreme Court.
    The New York Times did an Article about Moraes. Have a look.
    Brazilians think they are too far to become a Venezuela. But everything is, slowly, happening towards that. Sad!

  • @RafaelLima-hg8kz
    @RafaelLima-hg8kz Год назад

    Great vídeo.
    The answer to the final question: neither of them.
    Maybe , in 4 years, bolsonaro and Lula can be in the jail. Both. And then , we , brazilians, can be free to think another choice

  • @dustintacohands1107
    @dustintacohands1107 Год назад +11

    Lula seems like a government man which to me is even worse than a corporate sellout. At least corporation’s are efficient with its spending.

  • @radcliffnorth7754
    @radcliffnorth7754 3 месяца назад

    Lets share this video with our fellow brazilians, see if they agree....I am sure they wont.

  • @pedroguedes278
    @pedroguedes278 Год назад +18

    Lula will worsen the situation he already made since 2003

  • @EdmondSimbad
    @EdmondSimbad Год назад +1

    It's Fernando Henrique Cardoso not Fernando Enrique Cardoso

  • @TVvaleelitoral
    @TVvaleelitoral Год назад +2

    It is very prudent to forget to mention that Haddad was considered by the people of São Paulo as the worst mayor that the city of São Paulo has ever had, he was also a teacher and anyone who was his student says that the only thing he knew how to teach was how to be a terrorist and a communist and of course Haddad doesn't know anything about the economy, he has never worked in the area, this is Lula's economy minister, he was put there with the sole purpose of opening the safe when Lula wants to send money to his communist friends, Maduro, Ortega, etc.,

  • @michaelborror4399
    @michaelborror4399 Год назад +2

    He should have a jaguar mascot or something for his conservation efforts?

  • @mahdibinho
    @mahdibinho Год назад +1

    Center-right in Lula's context means center-right inside the Left...

    • @Disaletteritis
      @Disaletteritis Год назад

      Exactly! If Brazil wants to save itself in the next decades their best move would be to get rid of Guilherme Boulos...he is Lula's natural sucessor and will definitely drive the final nail of the coffin of Brazil if given the chance to rule the country. God Save Brazil!

    • @ernestkhalimov1007
      @ernestkhalimov1007 Год назад +1

      @@Disaletteritis LULA SAVED Brazil

    • @Disaletteritis
      @Disaletteritis Год назад

      @@ernestkhalimov1007 no...by any means...

    • @ernestkhalimov1007
      @ernestkhalimov1007 Год назад

      @@Disaletteritisyes... by every means

    • @Disaletteritis
      @Disaletteritis Год назад

      @@ernestkhalimov1007 you don't know what you are talking about. He bettered the average Brazilians life by putting a small extra of money in their pockets, while he and the majority of the other Brazilian politicians stole the country via corruption. In his first two term years they cut more of the Amazon then in the Bolsonaro term in four. Whatever good he did, he would brag about in the media and then wreak havoc.

  • @matheusd.rodrigues429
    @matheusd.rodrigues429 Год назад

    Petrobras was NEVER close to bankruptcy. It fell in value but they have always been profitable and could pay its dues.
    And it's weird for you to cite Paulo Guedes as a great thing but show nothing that he actually did to liberalise Brazil's economy, the public debt is the highest its ever been (so privatization help nothing), the tax system is still burdensome (nothing changed and he actually tried inumeral times to recreate new taxes, on dividends and bank transactions, for instance), the unemployment rate calculation was change to include uberized jobs as formal jobs to get the numbers better (which I would considered creative accounting)...

  • @mementomori8791
    @mementomori8791 Год назад +17

    Question should be “how Lula managed to recall 60 million votes” and not “where Bolsonaro failed”. Even if he lost, Bolsonaro managed to increase the number of voters from 2018 to 2022.

    • @maryfranklin7034
      @maryfranklin7034 Год назад

      Bolzonaro won just like Trump won. PAPER BALLOTS NEEDED.

  • @DGoldy303
    @DGoldy303 Год назад +1

    11:25 Welp, this aged well. 🤣

  • @ananaturalamor
    @ananaturalamor 11 месяцев назад

    Lies, and lies... you guys are not in our shoes.

  • @farright118
    @farright118 Год назад +1

    How powerful is the Brazilian parliament? Because Lula has no way near a majority.
    What blocks could the parliament put up in his way?

    • @R.a.f.a.e.l.
      @R.a.f.a.e.l. Год назад

      Very powerful. Essentially the president can't do much without the Parliament's approval. A president can create some "Medidas Provisórias", which essentially are laws that are applied effectively immediately, but Congress can take these down as well.

  • @leolearth
    @leolearth 11 месяцев назад

    Limitations of understanding of Brazilian politics, sociology and history is abissal. Almost no cause-effect explaination makes sense.

  • @FilipeSilva1
    @FilipeSilva1 Год назад +1

    Guedes reads like gedys, not like gwaydees.

  • @sabbasdsouza
    @sabbasdsouza Год назад +15

    Brazil needs to replace the illegitimately taken UN Security Council seat russia illegally took from the USSR.

    • @ahsn1fan5
      @ahsn1fan5 Год назад

      Ah pronto, com certeza os países mais poderosos do mundo vão aceitar um país selvagem, subdesenvolvido de 3⁰mundo, totalmente irrelevante jogando as cartas no cenário internacional, confia🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @just_a_curious_thinker
      @just_a_curious_thinker Год назад +9

      I think UN should have 10 permanent members
      Because 5 doesn't represent while world.
      - There is no representative from South American continent.
      - No representative from Africa
      - No representative from middle-east
      - No representation to world's 2nd most populous country & 5th biggest GDP, India
      I think other members should be
      1) *India*
      2) *Japan / Germany*
      3) *Brazil / Argentina*
      4) *South Africa / Morocoo / Rwanda*
      5) *Iran / Saudi Arabia / UAE*
      And Veto power would require vote of at least 3-4 permanent nations instead of just one

    • @sabbasdsouza
      @sabbasdsouza Год назад +1

      @@just_a_curious_thinker Beautiful idea. UN is currently looking into security council reform precisely because putin used the USSR seat against the second largest country that was in the USSR out of spite and jealousy. UN is much to blame for this war and death of so many innocent people as well as other preventable tragedies in completely unrepresented south Asia, Africa and Latin America.

    • @just_a_curious_thinker
      @just_a_curious_thinker Год назад +2

      @@sabbasdsouza This is not my idea brother
      Indian Govt is promoting this idea since decades but seem to lack the support of other international countries.
      And I remember once in 2017, around 80 countries agreed on this agenda but this idea was vetoed by already present permanent members including US, France & China.
      (Although Russia & UK seemed to agree with this idea)
      Those who already have power often refuse to give others powers because of their selfish motives.
      But let's see what future says, India is this year the president of G-20. I hope this idea gets some attention

    • @sabbasdsouza
      @sabbasdsouza Год назад +1

      @@just_a_curious_thinker very interesting 🤔 👌 👍
      Sometimes there's good information in this comment section. 👍 it almost made it worth it to read through the last thousand garbage partisan tribal garbage to read something informative. Thanks so much.

  • @sparking023
    @sparking023 Год назад

    Lula will end Brazil if left alone, that's for sure. The difference here is that, while both promised to keep the public stimulus policy running, Bolsonaro and his team had the means to sustain that. The trend of privatization and government spending reductions would keep going, something that won't happen with Lula. He has a lot of cronies to employ with a lot of new ministries, and that means more public spending. The "development" strategy? BS, they tried this before and it did not work
    The Left in here has a modus operandi of spend, spend, spend, without thinking of where the money will come from, or how it will be actually used. For a brief moment, we had a resemblance of fiscal responsibility, then came the pandemic, and now this old snake, ready to funnel the country's money to broke neighbors and dictatorships again. *Brazil is not for amateurs, lemme tell ya*

  • @renato.bakaadv
    @renato.bakaadv Год назад +3

    Brazil controlled the inflation, today inflation in Brazil is lower then USA and Europe

  • @edupost2010
    @edupost2010 Год назад +7

    Congratulations to the Visual Politcs team. Despite being miles away from Brazil, you show quite a precise cenario that we are living here for now.

  • @farright118
    @farright118 Год назад +1

    I prefer this speaker than the other guy

  • @showcaseSampa
    @showcaseSampa Год назад

    An oversimplified explanation of this whole staged drama might be....
    The defeated, Bolsonaro, was aligned with the interests of Agri Business,. Meat Packers, Cattle Grazing Ranchers, Commodities Food Exporters. That is a huge supply chain that touches Rail, Truck Freight, Growers, your Domestic and Multinational Food and Commodity Conglomerates, Banks, Food Processors. And to a lesser extent to the Billionaire class ( extensive Labor reforms got approved under his tenure ).
    With him gone, there might be a rollback on environmental protections he helped to bust wide open. And the fire sale of Government Concessions ( Airports, Rail Lines, Highways, Utilities ). No more torching and razing the Amazon Forest for cheap cattle grazing, his cronies might no longer get the dispensed treatment they enjoyed, no more gimmies on concessions being auctioned off.
    As for the victor, there's been irrefutable proof of graft. A recent judgement against Honeywell, in a US Court, is forcing the company to pay up to 82 million dollars in fines for a 2 million Dollar bribe. The recipient of the bribe was a Petrobras executive, for Petrobras contracts on Plant Control Systems. The year, 2010. Go figure.
    The way these things work, the bribe never stays at the lower ranks, nor the upper echelon is directly involved in the receivership of the bribe. Old Italian Mafia rule. Money kicks up from downstairs to downstairs. Money comes clean at the top of the ranks.
    The victor and now incumbent, is pro-labor, pro-environment, pro social welfare, pro governamental regulations, and they love aparatchniks.
    The whole ruckus, as seen recently, is nothing more than an expedient from one side sabotage the incumbent's administration, and to some extent, extract concessions. All of those participants in those public nuisance events are nothing short of useful idiots ( uncle Zeke and Aunt Nelie being called of "Golpistas" was hilarious and ridiculous )_. Golpe de Estado = Coup D'Etat is an action carried out by people with guns and troops. Only the Armed Forces can pull such a feat.
    Sure, some of the Brass were given perks, pay raises. Yet, surprisingly as it might seem to be, it was Dilma who actually approved increases in the Military Budget for improving the Armed Forces in the procurement of weapons, support systems, jets.
    Bolsonaro might have the upper hand on the election, but he did not win any favor with the US Department of State when he circumvented sanctions against Iran, Russia, on export contracts, I would suspect most traded under barter agreements.
    That and the fact he espoused the bad habit of spouting nonsense at all times, irritating a lot of people ( female voters, gay voters, you pick the group, there were bound to be a lot of pissed off customers ). And to make matters worse, he went on a suck up mode with Trump.; He had to be called to the mat by his backers when he publicly ofended Iranians, who are huge importers of our beef contracts.
    And as for the Military siding with Bolsonaro, well that is a stretch. The Brass has little respect for a man who got expelled form the Barracks, as a middle rank officer. All of those who Presided the Country during the Dictatorship were Generals ( Castelo Branco, Costa e Silva, Medici, and Figueiredo ). Outsiders and outcasts don't get the privilege to be the next in succession.
    Either one of the other side, none are Paladins of Fair Game and Transparency. After all, this is Brazil, Not the Netherlands or New Zealand, or for that matter, a Scandinavian Country. Things happen.
    There's precedent on this type of politics. Pre Coup D'Etat, during the early 60's a Career Politician from Rio, Carlos Chagas, was known being an Artiste of the Soap Box, a flamer and eloquent SOB.
    His antics and vitriol were vicious not just against the Left. He attacked Joao Goulart ( Left leaning former President ), Juscelino Kubitschek ( A moderate and progressive leader, and the man who pushed for Brazil''s Manufacturing modernization through incentive programs ), possibly Janio Quadros ( a conservative )_ and he even dared to torched up Castelo Branco, the first General in the newly installed Military Government ( himself a moderate ).
    Carlos Chagas never got what he so wanted.... The Brazilian Presidency. He got shut out of the political arena,, only to die, not much later, of a heart attack. The master of the pulpit and antics, himself on the right, and Leonel Brizola on the left, were notorious to grab headlines for their staged impromptu acts.
    That's Brazil folks. When one side loses, and stands to lose a lot in the stakes game, they try to overturn the other side.