Q: Will the Tornado, F-16, and MiG-29 receive more flight model updates to increase their maneuverability and stability at certain speeds? The problem with the Tornado, in particular, is the weird flight model. In realistic and Full-real controls, the plane does wacky things that other jets do not, and in mouse-aim or simplified, the instructor restricts the maneuverability so much, that the plane struggles to do anything other than roll and try to force reversals when defending itself.
@@chiefturion7134 I don’t have the clearance xd. One other change that I’d like to be made to the F-16, and inverse for the MiG-29 is the low-speed handling. The F-16 should be worse at those speeds than the 29, and be able to be rated with by the swing-wings, while the MiG-29 is supposed to be the one that locks up more at high speeds and gets one-circled easily. Gaijin did the reverse with the flight models lol
@@flyingtiger0506 The Su-25 and A-10s are both supposed to be survivable. The A-10 is the only one that isn’t currently, but all Gaijin can really do is make the health of the tail and wings better because all of the flight control wires are considered as one unit for disabling, and that’s how it is on every aircraft.
Q. Why do you not allow players to change their game account emails? The game is over ten years old and bearing in mind that it has a 12 rating means that people will have changed or lost their emails or even used their parents emails to sign up for it.
You can, I don’t removed exactly how I did it, but I made an account with a school email and I changed it to a personal one. You just have not looked hard enough I guess?
This is exactly what happened to me. I had lost my accoutn for about a year because of this. However, if you contact support, they can add an email to your account.
there's an option for that if you check you account in gaijin's website, if you lost access or forgot the email you can contact support and describe your problem
Excellent episode. Loving the Tornadoes in-game, too. ❤ Regarding strike aircraft (and this is something myself and others have asked many times before), when are you going to correct the Ki-102 Otsu's combat designation as "Strike Aircraft" as well as give it it's missing armament? It's currently designated as "Interceptor". The Ko model is the interceptor variant (which we're still waiting for to be added to War Thunder).
In all truth, some Cold War vehicles fit in with the World War Two asthenic and work well with it, for example the early IS series tanks or the M41 in the American tech tree Aside from those examples I wholeheartedly agree
BTR-ZD. PT-76B. M42. M103. Kugelblitz. BTR-152A. ASU-85. ASU-57. G6. Type 75. Sub-I-II. ZSD63, M26A1, pretty much every French post-war tank for about a decade. ZSU-57-2, pretty much every Swiss TD below 7.0 that’s post-war. Would you like me to add some more?
Personal opinion on the Tornado: Having worked on it irl im pretty pleased, yes, genuenly surpised on how well its outer appearance and cockpit is modeled. In game, i only own the Naval Tornado, wich btw. carried the same armaments as the ASSTA 1, so GBU bombs should be available. It only differed in the ability to carry AS.34 Kormoran missiles. Those are my biggest thing i have to be picky about, the missiles would need a fair bit of work. Their flight path is unlike described by the german military in their videos about the tornado on their official YT channel, also they always aim for the super structure so the only way to hit components is shooting them from top down, instead of shooting them flying low from kilometers away, casue they would fly over the ship. Besides that, im pleased with the imroved flight perfrmance with the latest patch, well done, it doesnt rip as fast anymore. Im kinda missing the terain following autopilot feature, but besides tat, it does what i needs to do wonderfdully, and that is being a bomber and bomb things. Spaded it in a few days doing base bombing and ground pounding in WT. To kep it short, it needs some work still, with armament and flight perfromance/characteristics, but it has been wonderfully implimented and im very happy and would like to thank the developers for giving germany a plane type that was needed. Thank you
By what definition is the Tornado a third gen fighter? Both the Air Power Development Centre and Aerospaceweb (by far the most common definition schemes) consider it a gen 4, though perhaps not a great one
Gotta say, I love the Tornado, and the idea of it being present in the game, along the F-16, always hyped me. And now it's here! Can't wait to (maybe?) see the ADV variant as well: some define it as the "Tomcat with no Phoenix".
The Tornado IDS variants in the tech tree are 11.3, but the event IDS is still 10.7 because it has no GBUs. Gaijin, GBUs do not affect air battles, so why is my Tornado IDS still 11.3 in air battles?
@@milkelangelo1 And that's stupid. Why would I want to play an 11.3 plane which is 10.7 somewhere else? Why is it 11.3 due to purely air-to-ground ordnance? Why does that also apply to air battles? It makes no sense.
What are you gonna do about it? I also think mixed battles should have a separate br from air, but it's not like we can make the change. Besides, the 10.7 one is from an event, meaning you either got it by playing enough during the event, or you gotta pay it (as well as find as seller), and we all know that paid stuff is designed to generally do better
Flying the IL-2? NO WAY! I have standards (+there was only 2 of them in the game when I started to play so I never unlocked the rest). And for the Tornado ... I'd say it arrived too late, and it makes DoA. Germany and the British already had a plane for its role, and I rarely see Italian things in top tier, and all are easy targets in air RB. I like the plane it self tough, I even had a British one as a toy as a kid.
@@izanagisburden1080 haven't had any issues with the MiG-23Maf yet, but I guess that is down to the high wing loading on the Tornado, though the rolling overload is still annoying.
The tornados thrust revers should work in the air as it is connected to the ground safety switch. Moreover shouldn’t the thrust revers and airbreaks work at the same time as the reverser would blow into the now open air breaks and damage it, so there is a safety switch as well or better said the airbreak retreats automatically
Q: now when there has been a lot of new vehicles for all nations, are you planning on remaking/updating the "climbing the ranks" series to include the new machines
@@ChengLegend almost all of Czechia's indigenous designs are APCs, and their actual tanks are all soviet modernizations. during the cold war they used soviet tanks, and in WW2 they used german ones. they have very little in terms of tanks designed and made in Czevhoslovakia/Czechia worth adding. it would basically be a german tech tree until rank 3 and a soviet one to top tier with some custom modernizations.
Q: for tanks with 2 loaders, if 1 of them dies, how does it affect the reload rate? And tanks without a loader, do they simply never lose any loading time even if some crews die?
If it's an auto loader they don't lose any loading time even if you lose some crew. If 1 loader dies loading time is reset and loading is increased by a lot. If no loader can be replaced by let's say the commander then I believe it is doubled and if there is a replacement there is a smaller but still noticeable penalty.
What do we think of the tornado? Really cool but DOA and terribly implemented. It was nerfed 3 times before release and the flight model is abysmal. The ADV can rectify some issues but should already have been in game. She is such a cool jet it's sad
¿Will Italy receive in the near future the Oto Melara Draco 76mm spaa? It's almost equal to the OTOMATIC since both have the same gun but i think it would be nice to have something merely better for the italians even if it's only better in movility.
Tornado have not the correct CM dispensing system holds its back. 56 big caliber flares together with its minutes of continuous chaff deployment would be perfect. I think we should get a mechanic switch to start continuous chaff release.
Q: Why does the leopard 1a5no launch four of its eight smoke grenades at a time and not two like the leopard 2s or the leopard a1a1 L/44 could you please fix it just for the sake of saving the few smoke grenades you have
I've grinded the entire British tech tree on another account but had to get ride of it because of hacking reasons, but anyway how can I get back up to British top tier quickly on my Spino7095 on my new account and I have the Sea Harrier. If I can get the Harrier GR7(I already had the Harrier GR7 on my other account before it got hacked) that would be helpful. Thank you Gaijin and see next week.
The buffeting graphics need to be amended in game they are no way that harsh, and a Tonka’s intakes wouldn’t buffer with the rest of the wing, just saying 🤷🏼♂️
The glorious Tornado.. My favorite aircraft. I literally loved this aircraft when I was a kid. I couldn't wait to see it in game. I was excited for the Lightning and man it was good... But given I only play Sim battles in VR... The Tornado is the biggest let down ever. No radar in sim? You don't start with flares/chaff.. You start in an attacker with x2 missiles, against mig-23 -29's that are fully spaded. It's tedious. It's not worth my time or effort. Absolutely gutted how simulator has been left to rot. Even If I had bombs, You can't get near the convoy of factories. Using Guided munitions in VR is Hellish - is the full screen really needed when the cockpit has TV monitors? That you can't use? (mouse scroll doesn't work) It's not really the plane thats broken. It's the non existence of ID FRIEND FOE (IFF) --- They had it in ww2........... Please fix the way OP AAA in simulator on factories - convoys - carrier and ships (the runways and battle fields are perfect leave them) I have paid good money for ground pounding aircraft that I cannon use. Hundreds in fact! Guess how that makes your playerbase feel? I'm defiantly not the only one. I'm sick of having to go in chat and advise people NOT to attack targets.... Because it's instant death - they leave.. Probably never to return. Not everyone can or wants to dogfight... Warthunder is boiling my piss Kind Regards Ralgernok PS The port of Dover currently has a mangrove growing in it. I don't think this is historically correct. Please check it out.
@@MCP2002 they did change the german tornado engines, but i think it's more for accuracy then balance, since britain has even worse engines, and the difference is just a couple kilonewtons anyways
Yes it is, there is no impossible to evade missile in game, as much as you are aware of the missile and you know how to do it you can without problems, there are many tutorials on RUclips about it.
The wiki says that the Tornado is better at highspeed precision strikes, but this video says that it is easier and safer to use the laser guided bombs. Care to tell me the truth Gajin?
Gaijin I would like to ask a question. How come some times tanks with little armor bounce massive caliber shells? I had a game where a t 50 bounced my shell when I was using a Emil at close range (128mm gun)
you can watch Oxy's american tech tree series and the episode with your preferred tier to find out what vehicles are worth using. he does a very good job at explaining the use of each tank.
hello war thunder we are a community where our pc ran war thunder but due to the constant updates war thunder no longer works on our pc so we ask you if you can make a war thunder lite or optimize it. thank you
Q: Will the Tornado, F-16, and MiG-29 receive more flight model updates to increase their maneuverability and stability at certain speeds?
The problem with the Tornado, in particular, is the weird flight model. In realistic and Full-real controls, the plane does wacky things that other jets do not, and in mouse-aim or simplified, the instructor restricts the maneuverability so much, that the plane struggles to do anything other than roll and try to force reversals when defending itself.
If you want that you gotta leak some documents
@@chiefturion7134 ill get to it
@@chiefturion7134 I don’t have the clearance xd. One other change that I’d like to be made to the F-16, and inverse for the MiG-29 is the low-speed handling. The F-16 should be worse at those speeds than the 29, and be able to be rated with by the swing-wings, while the MiG-29 is supposed to be the one that locks up more at high speeds and gets one-circled easily. Gaijin did the reverse with the flight models lol
@@kommandantkillcode just like how they shaped the damage model shot for the su-25 and the a10
@@flyingtiger0506 The Su-25 and A-10s are both supposed to be survivable. The A-10 is the only one that isn’t currently, but all Gaijin can really do is make the health of the tail and wings better because all of the flight control wires are considered as one unit for disabling, and that’s how it is on every aircraft.
Q: Will wing vapor effects be added to jets?
the closest thing we have is the supersonic vapor cone
I hope this will be added soon
minus 10fps lol (doesnt matter when already 100+)
@@karantikoo9302 ?
Me to I want it so bad just make it optional if players complain
Q. Why do you not allow players to change their game account emails? The game is over ten years old and bearing in mind that it has a 12 rating means that people will have changed or lost their emails or even used their parents emails to sign up for it.
As somebody who did that when they were twelve I can confirm it is frustrating
You can, I don’t removed exactly how I did it, but I made an account with a school email and I changed it to a personal one. You just have not looked hard enough I guess?
its under settings within your account, its relatively easy to find online as well.
This is exactly what happened to me. I had lost my accoutn for about a year because of this. However, if you contact support, they can add an email to your account.
there's an option for that if you check you account in gaijin's website, if you lost access or forgot the email you can contact support and describe your problem
Fun fact: the first new steam locomotive in the United Kingdom since 1960, the Peppercorn A1 class no. 60163, is named Tornado, after the plane.
Excellent episode. Loving the Tornadoes in-game, too. ❤
Regarding strike aircraft (and this is something myself and others have asked many times before), when are you going to correct the Ki-102 Otsu's combat designation as "Strike Aircraft" as well as give it it's missing armament? It's currently designated as "Interceptor". The Ko model is the interceptor variant (which we're still waiting for to be added to War Thunder).
Cold war tanks should never face ww2 tanks change my mind.
In all truth, some Cold War vehicles fit in with the World War Two asthenic and work well with it, for example the early IS series tanks or the M41 in the American tech tree
Aside from those examples I wholeheartedly agree
Tiger 2 vs tanks with stabilizers is broken
Bro your telling me USA 7.0-8.0 is a fuckin nightmare when it gets up tiered.
Well, T55s faced of M4 Shermans in Israel and India. So, meh.
BTR-ZD. PT-76B. M42. M103. Kugelblitz. BTR-152A. ASU-85. ASU-57. G6. Type 75. Sub-I-II. ZSD63, M26A1, pretty much every French post-war tank for about a decade. ZSU-57-2, pretty much every Swiss TD below 7.0 that’s post-war. Would you like me to add some more?
Q: When will we get our F-111 Ardvark or the F-102?
Personal opinion on the Tornado:
Having worked on it irl im pretty pleased, yes, genuenly surpised on how well its outer appearance and cockpit is modeled.
In game, i only own the Naval Tornado, wich btw. carried the same armaments as the ASSTA 1, so GBU bombs should be available.
It only differed in the ability to carry AS.34 Kormoran missiles.
Those are my biggest thing i have to be picky about, the missiles would need a fair bit of work.
Their flight path is unlike described by the german military in their videos about the tornado on their official YT channel, also they always aim for the super structure so the only way to hit components is shooting them from top down, instead of shooting them flying low from kilometers away, casue they would fly over the ship.
Besides that, im pleased with the imroved flight perfrmance with the latest patch, well done, it doesnt rip as fast anymore.
Im kinda missing the terain following autopilot feature, but besides tat, it does what i needs to do wonderfdully, and that is being a bomber and bomb things.
Spaded it in a few days doing base bombing and ground pounding in WT.
To kep it short, it needs some work still, with armament and flight perfromance/characteristics, but it has been wonderfully implimented and im very happy and would like to thank the developers for giving germany a plane type that was needed.
Thank you
The Komorans can also do limited ground attack with the radar, right?
1:57... wow I dont know if Tornado in game can do that sharp turn :v
Will we see electronic countermeasures in the future?
By what definition is the Tornado a third gen fighter? Both the Air Power Development Centre and Aerospaceweb (by far the most common definition schemes) consider it a gen 4, though perhaps not a great one
Q: Will the M4A3 be receiving a dozerblade mod? (I's historical accurate)
Gotta say, I love the Tornado, and the idea of it being present in the game, along the F-16, always hyped me. And now it's here! Can't wait to (maybe?) see the ADV variant as well: some define it as the "Tomcat with no Phoenix".
The ADV was confirmed by gaijin when the IDS was announced, it was in the discussion on the page of the ids.
@@ace_fighter8850 is that so? Interesting...
whoever made the intro for the shooting range should get a massive raise
The Tornado IDS variants in the tech tree are 11.3, but the event IDS is still 10.7 because it has no GBUs. Gaijin, GBUs do not affect air battles, so why is my Tornado IDS still 11.3 in air battles?
because the br is unified for air and mixed battles
@@milkelangelo1 And that's stupid. Why would I want to play an 11.3 plane which is 10.7 somewhere else? Why is it 11.3 due to purely air-to-ground ordnance? Why does that also apply to air battles? It makes no sense.
What are you gonna do about it? I also think mixed battles should have a separate br from air, but it's not like we can make the change.
Besides, the 10.7 one is from an event, meaning you either got it by playing enough during the event, or you gotta pay it (as well as find as seller), and we all know that paid stuff is designed to generally do better
As an italian i appriciate to be here
tornado suffers at 11.3
Flying the IL-2? NO WAY! I have standards (+there was only 2 of them in the game when I started to play so I never unlocked the rest).
And for the Tornado ... I'd say it arrived too late, and it makes DoA. Germany and the British already had a plane for its role, and I rarely see Italian things in top tier, and all are easy targets in air RB. I like the plane it self tough, I even had a British one as a toy as a kid.
the Tornado experience: snaps wings instantly at the smallest roll or negative G load
that might be the variable wing that usually rips when fully or semi extended, happends with all planes who uses the variable wing
@@izanagisburden1080 haven't had any issues with the MiG-23Maf yet, but I guess that is down to the high wing loading on the Tornado, though the rolling overload is still annoying.
also the tornado experience: returns home with almost no wings
Loooool what a lie, the amount of amazing replays I’ve had and not 1
The tornados thrust revers should work in the air as it is connected to the ground safety switch. Moreover shouldn’t the thrust revers and airbreaks work at the same time as the reverser would blow into the now open air breaks and damage it, so there is a safety switch as well or better said the airbreak retreats automatically
Q: Are we going to get an SP option for custom battles? So players could use the attack drones and the nuke plane.
6:03 mind - blown
Big boy guns
Q: now when there has been a lot of new vehicles for all nations, are you planning on remaking/updating the "climbing the ranks" series to include the new machines
The Tornado is fine. I'd personally just like the Gr 4 to be added. 😉😉🇬🇧🛩️👍🏻
Don’t think they’ll add asraams
Question: when will we get the modern hungarian army's insignia?
I miss the old dude voice actor
Hey Gaijin will you guys ever add nukes to custom games (like and option to enable/disable)
Looking forward to unlocking jets!
Q: out of all the variable geometry wing designed aircraft what is the best for dogfighting?
the migs.. mig-23 and 27. then its the tomcat. the tornado needs an area as big as texas to make a 360° turn. su-17/22 are also ok
@@carsamba0055 i'd rather say the tomcat goes first given i've seen ot beat mig-29s
also note that the mig-23 is more maneuverable then the mig-27
@@carsamba0055I'll Bet This dude Has never Experienced Top Air battle.
Q: Is there a possibility of adding Czechoslovakia tech tree, it would be awesome.
It would literally be a copy paste tech tree, it would look like the chinese air tree but even the end wouldn't have good tanks lol
@@lexonfors Czechia had many good aircraft and tanks
@@lexonfors If they added Israel, they could add this
You may get a few event or battlepass vehicles, but a whole tech tree is a stretch tbh.
@@ChengLegend almost all of Czechia's indigenous designs are APCs, and their actual tanks are all soviet modernizations.
during the cold war they used soviet tanks, and in WW2 they used german ones.
they have very little in terms of tanks designed and made in Czevhoslovakia/Czechia worth adding.
it would basically be a german tech tree until rank 3 and a soviet one to top tier with some custom modernizations.
german mig29 when
I'm pretty sure te Tornado is a 4th generation jet aircraft, but still, cool insight as always
Q: for tanks with 2 loaders, if 1 of them dies, how does it affect the reload rate? And tanks without a loader, do they simply never lose any loading time even if some crews die?
If it's an auto loader they don't lose any loading time even if you lose some crew. If 1 loader dies loading time is reset and loading is increased by a lot. If no loader can be replaced by let's say the commander then I believe it is doubled and if there is a replacement there is a smaller but still noticeable penalty.
When can we have some balancing for planes in ground battles? Something like limiting the amout of planes per team so its not 1 tank with 8 aircraft?
I saw the black nose cone and thought we were getting the Foxbat finally.
Someday
What do we think of the tornado? Really cool but DOA and terribly implemented. It was nerfed 3 times before release and the flight model is abysmal. The ADV can rectify some issues but should already have been in game. She is such a cool jet it's sad
Q: Why is the Maus a higher BR than the leopard 1 and when will ejection seats be introduced to war thunder?
I think they should both be 7.7, just because most 6.3s can’t do anything to the Maus, and the Leopard honestly is just 7.7 worthy.
Maus is a POS to balance
Lower and nothing can kill it
Higher and it dies instantly
Have you done a P-51 triathlon?
¿Will Italy receive in the near future the Oto Melara Draco 76mm spaa? It's almost equal to the OTOMATIC since both have the same gun but i think it would be nice to have something merely better for the italians even if it's only better in movility.
Tornado have not the correct CM dispensing system holds its back.
56 big caliber flares together with its minutes of continuous chaff deployment would be perfect.
I think we should get a mechanic switch to start continuous chaff release.
I am a war thunder player that had to sell my Xbox to buy a Nintendo switch. Will war thunder ever be on Nintendo switch
Q: Could you add the Eurofighter Typhoon to the German, British and Italian tech tree?
THEY NEED TO😂❤🎉😅😊
Yay
Q: Why does the leopard 1a5no launch four of its eight smoke grenades at a time and not two like the leopard 2s or the leopard a1a1 L/44 could you please fix it just for the sake of saving the few smoke grenades you have
Q: will there be a million subscriber special of some sort seeing as the channel has quickly grown past 900 thousand subs already?
We need Tank battles without Cas I’m just saying.
Q: how does changing the angle of your wings effect your plane?
low angle=higher drag but higher maneuverability
high angle=lower drag but lower maneuverability
Tornado is (not) cool and all but can germany get a real rank 8 plane?
We should’ve gotten the MIG-29 but gaijin said no only USSR
@@mangoiseh2914 the east german mig 21 is good, but east german mig29 is better
@@karantikoo9302 yeah I’m a German main and the BIS can be good
F-4F ICE with AMRAAM
Q: when ar.34 kormoran will work like it should?
Will we see an expansion of the ground destruction physics, like dynamic craters on both dirt and concrete/road? because we only have it for dirt
Up the F-14 br and Ej Kai doesn't deserve 11.7 while it being a 3rd gen while some 4th gens are 11.3.
When will the World war Event make it return? It was a ton of fun last time.
Q: Are you planning on adding a Balkan/Yugoslavia nation to War Thunder?
Functional strobascope for the Char2C when??? At least make it realistically animated? :)))
i like the event tornado, the regular ones have a too high BR and always faces the F-16, F-14 and the Mig-29 which makes it horrible
Q: wich Is the best tactic for tanks like the STRV 121?
Week 103: Please fix your economy since it’s most important. Been asking you Gaijin for almost 2 years now.
Q: Is there a place for direct fire capable mortar vehicles (such as Patria AMV with NEMO or AMOS turret) in war thunder?
Q: Can Naval Radar track the AS.34 Kormoran missiles? Can you shoot them down?
Q: Have there ever been plans for collab events with other games (ex: Ace Combat or Call of Duty)?
"Laser guided to be precise" (2:15) Eurgh ew
nerd: EXCUSE ME THE TOILETS ARE FOR DISPLAY
me: 1:39
Q:Will you remake/remaster maps or vehicles? Sorta like the He 111 cockpit update
They remade the jagdpanther in one of the recent updates, if that counts
Q: hey war thunder have you ever considered adding the CAC-15 kangaroo to game
Make a short about the Chinese "spy" balloon please
Q: can you please give a dozer Blade on the Sherman
I've grinded the entire British tech tree on another account but had to get ride of it because of hacking reasons, but anyway how can I get back up to British top tier quickly on my Spino7095 on my new account and I have the Sea Harrier. If I can get the Harrier GR7(I already had the Harrier GR7 on my other account before it got hacked) that would be helpful. Thank you Gaijin and see next week.
i'm obsessed with this but... war thunder edge will be released in this month or not? cant wait to play
7:42 the tankers, the tankers dont want cas diving on them
The buffeting graphics need to be amended in game they are no way that harsh, and a Tonka’s intakes wouldn’t buffer with the rest of the wing, just saying 🤷🏼♂️
The glorious Tornado.. My favorite aircraft. I literally loved this aircraft when I was a kid. I couldn't wait to see it in game. I was excited for the Lightning and man it was good... But given I only play Sim battles in VR... The Tornado is the biggest let down ever. No radar in sim? You don't start with flares/chaff.. You start in an attacker with x2 missiles, against mig-23 -29's that are fully spaded. It's tedious. It's not worth my time or effort. Absolutely gutted how simulator has been left to rot.
Even If I had bombs, You can't get near the convoy of factories. Using Guided munitions in VR is Hellish - is the full screen really needed when the cockpit has TV monitors? That you can't use? (mouse scroll doesn't work)
It's not really the plane thats broken. It's the non existence of ID FRIEND FOE (IFF) --- They had it in ww2...........
Please fix the way OP AAA in simulator on factories - convoys - carrier and ships (the runways and battle fields are perfect leave them)
I have paid good money for ground pounding aircraft that I cannon use. Hundreds in fact! Guess how that makes your playerbase feel? I'm defiantly not the only one.
I'm sick of having to go in chat and advise people NOT to attack targets.... Because it's instant death - they leave.. Probably never to return. Not everyone can or wants to dogfight...
Warthunder is boiling my piss
Kind Regards
Ralgernok
PS The port of Dover currently has a mangrove growing in it. I don't think this is historically correct. Please check it out.
If I land a helicopter on a captured zone can I replenish rockets/ammo?
Q. Will germany get their version of the MiG 29 in tye next major update or will it be left lacking in the air to air department?
I’m pretty sure it was shown in the dev stream.
(Week 31 of asking)
Could we get a segment/video on the Soviet SB-2/Ar-2 bomber family?
Can the British Tornado have the correct Mk103 engines?
No
I hope decal of TaktLwG 33 and 51 Tornado can be added.
G: hey gaijin, can you tell me if the 75mm planes where effective and where they used
What about the event tornado?
Why is the German IDS being highlighted as the most powerful Tornado when you are reducing the engine power to be inline with the other Tornados?
videos on yt probably refer to the Marineflieger, because it is at 10.7
@@milkelangelo1 No, I saw a note saying the German tt Tornado was getting its eng power reduced to be inline with the other tt tornados.
@@MCP2002 they did change the german tornado engines, but i think it's more for accuracy then balance, since britain has even worse engines, and the difference is just a couple kilonewtons anyways
Q: when will the volumes of ground and air tracks be released
Q: does the artillery just spawn above you or does it fire from somewhere
Q: I’m pretty sure the Mirage 2000 had a G limiter ingame, but it was removed when it came to the live server, can you do the same for the F-16?
The F-16 in real life does have a G limiter (or more precisely, an AoA limiter)
@@milkelangelo1 so than Ingame it should be an AOA limiter, not a G Force one.
@@mujtam and it is
Q : Is it possible to evade guided Air to Air or Land to Air missiles?
Yes it is, there is no impossible to evade missile in game, as much as you are aware of the missile and you know how to do it you can without problems, there are many tutorials on RUclips about it.
The wiki says that the Tornado is better at highspeed precision strikes, but this video says that it is easier and safer to use the laser guided bombs. Care to tell me the truth Gajin?
Q: does the PAPI lights actually works?
Gaijin I would like to ask a question. How come some times tanks with little armor bounce massive caliber shells? I had a game where a t 50 bounced my shell when I was using a Emil at close range (128mm gun)
Angling
Or in some cases
Jank
Will you guys add Mid air Refueling for modern Jets?
Did British Tornado has an ALARM anti-radiation missiles with two attack modes implemented in missile?
Or the tornado air defence version to be added next
When can we have the su/isu 152 in metal beasts???
What would happen if a open top vehicle shot a wall with HE beside it? Would the crew die?
q: what is the best american mid tear tank?
you can watch Oxy's american tech tree series and the episode with your preferred tier to find out what vehicles are worth using.
he does a very good job at explaining the use of each tank.
7:37 I don't if it means I don;t have to have it done to me either.
When you gonna add cluster bombs on to the Tornado Gaijin?
Q: when F-111 please I want the aardvark
Will you ever add the Iowa class battleships and if you do will there be different skins from BB-61 to BB-64? (Iowa and Wisconsin)
hello war thunder we are a community where our pc ran war thunder but due to the constant updates war thunder no longer works on our pc so we ask you if you can make a war thunder lite or optimize it. thank you
Will high air drag bombs like the snake eye ever be added?
Will you bring back the "Legends" series again at some point?