@@lizzi4289 Japan have a two vehicle system (Type 81c) and Gaijin already has implemented the ability to control more than one vehicle (like a scout drone in ground or airplane in naval mode).
@@joeyjo-jojuniorshabadoo6827 They could even attach the radar as a trailer similar to how the churchill crocodile was added, since fake systems and setups were given to the Yak 141 this shouldnt be a problem.
@@K.Marx48 the real ariete has armor equivalent to the abrams and even more thanks to the addition of the war kit and the PSO package but alas gaijin can’t model anything correct unless it’s Russian or Chinese
@@NGC2419- It had more armor equivalent then M1? Which? M1A2 - it would really crazy composit there if you compare armored inner volume and weight of both vehicles. Armor is heavy and Ariete is simply to light have good armor.
Chinese MBT should have won, it scored nearly perfect on all tests, while the Abrams literally took the last place on the first test, seems a bit unfair to bump it up to first place when it completely fumbled the first part
Exactly lmfao. The Chinese tank did the overall best AND took first place in one test. American tank literally did not do any better than average in any test. And I don’t see why they said it has better armor than Chinese tank like bruh Chinese one has way better hull armor than abrams.
@@twangybubblextr3560 there is no 120mm version of Olifant Mk.2. It was only proposed but never build. I don't know where you get that information but SA have barely money for keeping their current vehicles working, they can't afford doing any more expensive upgrades.
@@muffin_the_great ah thanks for the info, I was reading the other day on a website and it said there are two variants of the tank in service, I thought it sounded odd but I had no reason to doubt as I don’t know a huge amount about SA armour
It's amazing how the yak 141 made all these "world records" with out a radar or gun or any weapons at all. But hey I'm sure if it was really good they would of kept making it like the mig 29 and 31 right? 🌻
Q: Will the Hunter F.58 be getting moved out of the German tech tree? Pretty much everybody agrees that Germany of all countries shouldn't have gotten it and instead went to the British tree or the French tree. This is especially true considering it is better than the Hunter F.6 that sits at 10.0 BR with no flares, while the F.58 sits at 9.3 with flares.
@@shirghazaycowboys, if I remember correctly German tanks have to have horns to drive in puplic roads. Like turning signals etc. But thanks for the Info about the American versions. I also see some Horns on some tanks in war thunder. Would be cool if they added them
Great episode! Sure would love to get more Marauders in-game. Especially later models with the canted engines. Q1: Some aircraft in War Thunder still have the old afterburner effect (e.g. T-2, F-1, F-100, F-89, etc.). Do you plan on updating them to use the new one? Q2: What about implementing ejection systems for the appropriate helicopters?
For the Lancaster, I see you have added the Tall Boy bomb. What about the Grand Slam bomb for it? The Grand Slam was a 22,000 lb bomb carried by the Lancaster, and it would add to the realism that you guys are trying to achieve in this game.
Any chance we could get a keybind to toggle the auto reload of tank shells so you have the option to load the desired round for your target without needing to shoot first?
@@steakinbacon8593 I think you might misunderstand, not removing shells from breach to load another one but simply leaving the chamber empty without loading anything. That way when you see a target you can choose and load the appropriate ammo.
It's really glitchy, it's best to lock with radar (try to fight with the wobbly lock) then guide your missile to the target. You may have to lead quite a bit and it can appear to overcorrect, any fast and agile plane is very irritating to shoot at *cough* F16
Question: Are you guys going to add the XF5U or the “Flying Flapjack” to the game? There were 2 made in real life carrying 6 .50 caliber machine guns and 2 1000lb bombs.
Q: will we ever see some more of Italian attackers in the furture? I feel like the tree lacks a lot of Italy’s much needed vehicles. Also could we maybe see a Romanian sub tree for Italy in the future?
Do you guys have any plans on lining up the various tech trees ? At the moment top tier Naval covers ships of the 1930s (with a few exceptions), top tier Air has aircraft from the late 1970s while top tier Ground has tanks from the early 21st century !
Ariete AMV should be 10.7 at best as It's litterally the normal Ariete with a slightly better engine. It should have been the pt3 with both pso and warkit
Q: Any chances for south korea tanks like K1 and K2? Would be awesome to put south korea line in Japan tree (with K1,K2, SPAAs and IFVs). To be honest theres a lot of vehicles that can be added into Japan tree, like 3-4 SPAAs which are classifying for WT requirements so they are like gepard or adats. Also some cool IFVs (k21, with K21 XC-8 as good premium idea) with that and K1/K1A1 + K2 tanks its should be really good addition to Japan tree which should help a lot, also i think its can be used for planes too. South Korea pretty nice amount of vehicles but i think still too small for additional tech tree, so "dragons alliance" would be really cool option to see.
@@viruspter1dactl Not yet they should get the 2a7V when other nations get stuff like the T90M, Challenger 3, M1A2 SEPv2. But for now somthing like the 2a6M or 2a5PSO or Leopard 2a6E just somthing the get the number of Mbts to the same lvl as other the Uk and USA for instance have 5 Russia, japan and China have 4 Isreal, Italy, Sweden and France have 3 while germany is the only one with 2, if in the next two updates they can get 2 more they would be in a good spot again, and then when they add stuff like the T90M and the others i named they can have the 2a7v.
To all the players of War Thunder: I believe everyone has noticed the recent changes in the in-game economy, whether it's for naval, ground, air battles, AB, RB, or SB. Gaijin is continuously pushing the boundaries and testing the limits of its players. If you are familiar with the game "Escape from Tarkov," you probably know the consequences when game developers constantly provoke their player base. As players of this game, we contribute to its activity, and in theory, Gaijin should appreciate each and every one of us who continues to support and encourage this game. However, Gaijin keeps pushing the boundaries and exploiting each and every one of us. This recent economic change is not just a simple adjustment; Gaijin is gradually making it clear that if you don't pay for this game, you don't deserve to play it. I implore every player here to bravely stand up and resist this behavior. Gaijin has now infringed upon our rights as players, and we cannot, and should not, let Gaijin continue to exploit us in the future. It is time for us players to unite and stand together. We should be a collective, a class, opposing Gaijin's exploitation and oppression towards us. We are here to enjoy this game, to find joy in it, and we should not be working for Gaijin. I hope that each player will save and spread this message. This post will undoubtedly be deleted, but we should copy it, share it, on any platform, anywhere that allows us to make our voices heard. Fellow warriors, let's fight for our future. Stay strong! Not my written by me, spread the message
Q:So when u gonna add finally bigger maps for ground RB too or atleast add a option for players to decise if they want to play on big maps or small maps, atleast for those with premium account??? If not reduce number of players at top tier ground RB to 10 players on small maps so theres less chaos and faster mm?
@@lexonfors I also agree with you, believe it or not but Brazil had a lot of designs but unfortunately we don't have enough for a tt, also it could be a subtt for probably Italy or the US
Q: Any chances for more type 10 versions for Japanese tech tree since Japan ground tree stil have some issues and atleast additional top MBT would help players since theres like only 4 tanks for top tier? Prototype 4 should be cool idea since we got Type-90 B in game already.
I would rather the bigger tech trees [mostly Russia] to not get new vehicles until the smaller trees get fleshed out more it feels like they are being led behind.
Q: How do IR guided missiles calculate lead? Radar ones get distance data from their guidance system and can therefore calculate lead, but how do IR missiles do it if they can't get the distance data to their target.
When it comes to sidewinders, I believe there is a natural lead effect thats produced by detecting the *change in target position since last observation* as opposed to the actual position itself. So the AIM-9 detects the target, determines if its how many degrees from the centre of its seeker, and deviates depending on that change in position in order to maintain a constant angle between itself and the target.
Could you in a next episode explain the A cap in pve helicopters so many ppl don't know that you have to return to a friendly airfield.. or change (Land on any pad) to return to friendly airfield ...!;)
I like the new Yak :) someone tried to bomb my tank with it but i'm a pro at using the "J" button ;D When i see CAS i just J out at the right moment to make them lose all their bombs without getting a kill xD No skill = No grind :D
Is There any chance we will get The Lopard 2A7V one day? Since there are so many Variants of the M1 and the Challanger. And the German Puma usually have "Spike" Atgms.
Spike ATGMs would be too overpowered right now, which is why it wasn't added originally anyway. More top tier MBTs for Germany are likely coming soon, most notably the 2A5PSO which I think will be in the next event.
As much as I would love for these to be a game unfortunately, they would mostly be useful only in ground realistic battles. However, the B2 might stand a chance to at least bomb one base given. Radar missiles will be useless against it.
They knew they had to wait till the british had an MBT that could actually finish the race inside the video length
Top speed the chally beats most
And in reverse
@@caratomlinson3552 goofy ah british player response
@@DevVexus well technically he's not wrong
Would have been nice if they’d waited until the 2E was modeled correctly though...
I think we need an episode of the Shooting Range made by the basement meme guy. Just to see what happens.
Pages of History: Kraft Mac 'n Cheese
XD
YES! We neeeed this
Fr
10:33 "Their tight layout and small crews have no chance."
Nah you cappin' man, we all know BVM doesn't have any spalling.
For real lmao. Or ammo blacking out and nothing
I've had situations where I hit the thing with a 500kg gbu and it only tracks it and takes its gun out
@@paulwilliams4371 russian bias
@@paulwilliams4371 that is just bombs being dumb.
Q: will you ever add torque in addition to the horsepower numbers on ground vehicle stat cards?
would honest be pretty helpful to know, good idea!
That sounds useless and adds clutter
Q: Will you be adding the LAHAT gun launched ATGM to the Merkava family of tanks? They would be really fun to use!
yea as someone who enjoys playing Israel that would be amazing
@@paulwilliams4371 I'm honestly surprised they didn't get added from the start. They are a key part of the Merkava's firepower suite.
@@randomexcessmemories4452 Yea I completely agree
Q: Is there any top tier SAM systems that are being considered to be added to Japan?
no
They simply don’t have irl. But they don’t have f16s as well so…
Type 81c and chu-mpm.
The latter being more likely since its complete self reliant for use.
@@lizzi4289 Japan have a two vehicle system (Type 81c) and Gaijin already has implemented the ability to control more than one vehicle (like a scout drone in ground or airplane in naval mode).
@@joeyjo-jojuniorshabadoo6827 They could even attach the radar as a trailer similar to how the churchill crocodile was added, since fake systems and setups were given to the Yak 141 this shouldnt be a problem.
ariete without composite armor at 11.3
While the real Ariete has composite armour
@@K.Marx48 the real ariete has armor equivalent to the abrams and even more thanks to the addition of the war kit and the PSO package but alas gaijin can’t model anything correct unless it’s Russian or Chinese
@@NGC2419- the armour values are classified, anyway the arietes have composite armour, it's an MBT for god's sake
imagine
@@NGC2419- It had more armor equivalent then M1?
Which?
M1A2 - it would really crazy composit there if you compare armored inner volume and weight of both vehicles.
Armor is heavy and Ariete is simply to light have good armor.
Chinese MBT should have won, it scored nearly perfect on all tests, while the Abrams literally took the last place on the first test, seems a bit unfair to bump it up to first place when it completely fumbled the first part
Exactly lmfao. The Chinese tank did the overall best AND took first place in one test. American tank literally did not do any better than average in any test. And I don’t see why they said it has better armor than Chinese tank like bruh Chinese one has way better hull armor than abrams.
Ah yes another good ol' Shoot Range video from War Thunder!
Thank you so much for adding custom loadouts to the SAAB-105g it’s my favourite aircraft in game :)
Q : Ever thought of expanding the south african sub tech tree with the olifant mk1b optimum? or anything else?
Probably come as an event or a squadron tank.
Could add the 120mm variant of the Olifant mk2 as well
@@twangybubblextr3560 there is no 120mm version of Olifant Mk.2. It was only proposed but never build. I don't know where you get that information but SA have barely money for keeping their current vehicles working, they can't afford doing any more expensive upgrades.
@muffinjustnotedible does the same go for the rooikat? They never built the 120mm version
@@muffin_the_great ah thanks for the info, I was reading the other day on a website and it said there are two variants of the tank in service, I thought it sounded odd but I had no reason to doubt as I don’t know a huge amount about SA armour
It's amazing how the yak 141 made all these "world records" with out a radar or gun or any weapons at all. But hey I'm sure if it was really good they would of kept making it like the mig 29 and 31 right? 🌻
Hey Gaijin since ur redoing the old triathlons, could you please also redo the top tier jets triathlons?
Dude, there's not enough 4th gens to begin with.
The closest are the Top 3rd gens, and too many Phantoms
Winner: mig 29
That would be the shortest triathlon ever man just wait until we get more 4th gen jets then we can talk about this.
@@steakinbacon8593 it probably won't be long since the community is leaking classified documents like it's going out of fashion
Funny how BVM didn't won a Armor contest with all that bullshit era, Fuel tanks, no fragmentation and no exploding ammo
Q: will playable aircraft carriers be added?
I love how war thunder stands today a lot of people are still playing every three to four months we have new updates just perfection
Q: Israel has a lot of Anti-Tank Missile Systems like the Pereh or the Hafiz - are they ever considered to join the IDF in War Thunder?
Q: Will the Hunter F.58 be getting moved out of the German tech tree? Pretty much everybody agrees that Germany of all countries shouldn't have gotten it and instead went to the British tree or the French tree. This is especially true considering it is better than the Hunter F.6 that sits at 10.0 BR with no flares, while the F.58 sits at 9.3 with flares.
Q: could you install Horns to the tank? Would be nice to alert your teammates dreaming next to you or to distrack enemys!
I can't answer for other tanks, but I was on m1a1s in the Marines for four years. They don't have horns, no Abrams does
@@shirghazaycowboys, if I remember correctly German tanks have to have horns to drive in puplic roads. Like turning signals etc.
But thanks for the Info about the American versions. I also see some Horns on some tanks in war thunder. Would be cool if they added them
Q: Will we ever see a Btr line in Russia (Even though it's the largest in the game,it gets absolutely no wheeled ifvs)
They should add a feature that launches the orcs into the air with their turrets!
And don’t forget there should be a 30% chance of Russian tanks being towed of the battlefield by random tractors.
Q: Will you add more swedish or finnish vehicles? like the CV9030?
We need cv9035 or cv9050 plzzzz
I sure hope so.
thanks for answering my question!!
Great episode! Sure would love to get more Marauders in-game. Especially later models with the canted engines.
Q1: Some aircraft in War Thunder still have the old afterburner effect (e.g. T-2, F-1, F-100, F-89, etc.). Do you plan on updating them to use the new one?
Q2: What about implementing ejection systems for the appropriate helicopters?
seeing the Type-10 get out accelerated by some of these tanks really hits different
Challenge: The fully stock US F-84F in fully uptier Air Realistic battle. let's see how it performs.
I'd love to see WT devs play their own game and see how much of a struggle bus the entire game can be.
For the Lancaster, I see you have added the Tall Boy bomb. What about the Grand Slam bomb for it? The Grand Slam was a 22,000 lb bomb carried by the Lancaster, and it would add to the realism that you guys are trying to achieve in this game.
Any chance we could get a keybind to toggle the auto reload of tank shells so you have the option to load the desired round for your target without needing to shoot first?
As meet as that would be only a handful of tanks in game could do that irl so it’s unlikely to be added
“Neat”
@@steakinbacon8593 I think you might misunderstand, not removing shells from breach to load another one but simply leaving the chamber empty without loading anything. That way when you see a target you can choose and load the appropriate ammo.
The new Ariete amv Pt1 in real life can equip both the war kit and the pso kit, are you planning to add these to the War Thunder version?
They already said in a devblog that they will add another AMV that can mount WAR and PSO, but the one we have now will stay without them.
@@bigoof1105 Cool thanks man
-400k RP
If there ever is a metal beasts segment about the He 162, it should be called wooden beast
I want a tank mode that only has tanks, no planes.
Strv122 used to have HEVT
Sad to miss the helis
Q: How many air RB maps have aircraft
carriers and can more be added?
Can we please have the isu-152 in metal beasts some time in the future???
Nobody is surprise by the fact that the 2 brand new top tier tank are worst than the others already here (btw I am a Italian main if you have doubts )
Q: Any plans on adding new nations like India, Egypt, Spain or Brazil?
Could probably merge india tree with british tree cus similar origins
Q: do you guys plan on adding nukes to custom games as a toggle slider?
I agree, and strike drones
Can you guys make it so MBTs can climb steep hills like they can in real life
No. That would mean that devs had to admit that their maps are trash.
Q: On the Pantsir, how do you switch from manual missile guidance to automatic?
It's really glitchy, it's best to lock with radar (try to fight with the wobbly lock) then guide your missile to the target. You may have to lead quite a bit and it can appear to overcorrect, any fast and agile plane is very irritating to shoot at *cough* F16
Question: when Will you add The WAR kit for the Ariete?
Q:When will the new Chinese jet J-10A be released?
Q: A long running joke in the community is bomber cockpits. will you update them?
Q: will you add dynamic building destruction at ground battles in the future? I saw some Prototype footage of it.
Week 108: Please fix your economy since it’s the most important. I’ve been asking you, Gaijin, for more than 2 years now.
Nitpick... The Yak wasn't the first supersonic VTOL fighter, that was the VJ-101C
Question: Are you guys going to add the XF5U or the “Flying Flapjack” to the game? There were 2 made in real life carrying 6 .50 caliber machine guns and 2 1000lb bombs.
Q: can you bring back the ability to walk around your vehicles in the hanger... i really enjoyed getting a sense of scale that way
Q: are you considering to at more sph's for example the Panzerhaubitze 2000 for Germany since they're only good sph sits on 1.0 as the 15cm?
I agree this and the paladin for the US.
I would like to see the Osório MBT in war thunder, could be a very nice addition
With the addition of the Pantsir as the top SPAA vehicle, Will we see a replacement to the type 93, or an upgrade in the future?
What tank do you use for The Shooting Range? (The one that fires a round and starts a new chapter in the video)
Q: will we ever see some more of Italian attackers in the furture? I feel like the tree lacks a lot of Italy’s much needed vehicles. Also could we maybe see a Romanian sub tree for Italy in the future?
Hey if Sweden got Finland as a sub tech tree then Italy can get Romania in the future.
Do you guys have any plans on lining up the various tech trees ? At the moment top tier Naval covers ships of the 1930s (with a few exceptions), top tier Air has aircraft from the late 1970s while top tier Ground has tanks from the early 21st century !
Ariete AMV should be 10.7 at best as It's litterally the normal Ariete with a slightly better engine. It should have been the pt3 with both pso and warkit
i vote for the old british guys voice back
Q: What setting is needed to use the HMD in VR?
Praga firing sound, video named: АРЈ ПВО гађање, other videos newer ones : Lazar 3p, p stands for praga the weapon nickname.
Q: Any chances for south korea tanks like K1 and K2? Would be awesome to put south korea line in Japan tree (with K1,K2, SPAAs and IFVs).
To be honest theres a lot of vehicles that can be added into Japan tree, like 3-4 SPAAs which are classifying for WT requirements so they are like gepard or adats.
Also some cool IFVs (k21, with K21 XC-8 as good premium idea) with that and K1/K1A1 + K2 tanks its should be really good addition to Japan tree which should help a lot, also i think its can be used for planes too.
South Korea pretty nice amount of vehicles but i think still too small for additional tech tree, so "dragons alliance" would be really cool option to see.
Q: Its been 13 Major Updated since Germany got a new top tier tech tree mbt when will they get a new one
at this rate never
They do not need a 2a7.
@@viruspter1dactl maybe not a A7, rather something like an A6M. And one more Rank 7 MBT would be nice too. Other Nations swarm you with 5 Toptiers..
@@theDarkside798 but Germany gets tons of light tanks like the bagel and puma which can hold they're own at top tier
@@viruspter1dactl Not yet they should get the 2a7V when other nations get stuff like the T90M, Challenger 3, M1A2 SEPv2. But for now somthing like the 2a6M or 2a5PSO or Leopard 2a6E just somthing the get the number of Mbts to the same lvl as other the Uk and USA for instance have 5 Russia, japan and China have 4 Isreal, Italy, Sweden and France have 3 while germany is the only one with 2, if in the next two updates they can get 2 more they would be in a good spot again, and then when they add stuff like the T90M and the others i named they can have the 2a7v.
Q: will south korea ever be added as a subtree for japan?
Q: When will the basment guy get released from gaijin HQ's basement?
Q: Will be seeing more jet bombers for the US like the F-111 Aardvark?
Or Aussie F-111 Pig version 😉
Q: when will we see a new leopard 2 for germany it's been a long time since they got a new top tier MBT
It's one of the most numerous tech trees at top tier, didn't you hear the speaker? 🤣
@@yourmommy5 XD LMFAO
To all the players of War Thunder:
I believe everyone has noticed the recent changes in the in-game economy, whether it's for naval, ground, air battles, AB, RB, or SB. Gaijin is continuously pushing the boundaries and testing the limits of its players. If you are familiar with the game "Escape from Tarkov," you probably know the consequences when game developers constantly provoke their player base. As players of this game, we contribute to its activity, and in theory, Gaijin should appreciate each and every one of us who continues to support and encourage this game. However, Gaijin keeps pushing the boundaries and exploiting each and every one of us. This recent economic change is not just a simple adjustment; Gaijin is gradually making it clear that if you don't pay for this game, you don't deserve to play it.
I implore every player here to bravely stand up and resist this behavior. Gaijin has now infringed upon our rights as players, and we cannot, and should not, let Gaijin continue to exploit us in the future. It is time for us players to unite and stand together. We should be a collective, a class, opposing Gaijin's exploitation and oppression towards us. We are here to enjoy this game, to find joy in it, and we should not be working for Gaijin.
I hope that each player will save and spread this message. This post will undoubtedly be deleted, but we should copy it, share it, on any platform, anywhere that allows us to make our voices heard. Fellow warriors, let's fight for our future. Stay strong!
Not my written by me, spread the message
German Tree at top tier one of the most numerous? Wtf
Me too just said: Wait, WTF?!
Especially the way he tried to make the 2 a6 look like a new vehicle lmao germany needs its third top Tier tank...
Nxt patch I hope for vapors over the fusealage and tire pivoting when taxing.
Q:So when u gonna add finally bigger maps for ground RB too or atleast add a option for players to decise if they want to play on big maps or small maps, atleast for those with premium account??? If not reduce number of players at top tier ground RB to 10 players on small maps so theres less chaos and faster mm?
What about a brazilian tech tree? They have unique variation of some aircraft, and ground vehicles including mbts
unique variations, not unique vehicles. Not enough truly unique things to make a tech tree out of.
@@lexonfors I understand the air situation, but for ground vehicles it would be a banger
@@cepv_2305 i think it would be better as a subtree in another nation.
@@lexonfors I also agree with you, believe it or not but Brazil had a lot of designs but unfortunately we don't have enough for a tt, also it could be a subtt for probably Italy or the US
@@cepv_2305 Latin America could in general make a good subtree for Italy.
Q: i heared that u will add one of the Bf109 that Erich Hartmann flew on his birthday and i heared it is an premium plane?
Bruh, Ariete lost against the Type 10 in the protection portion... that's how ya know it needs fixing
Q: Will you add more special US Helicopters like the MH-60L DAP or the RAH-66? (:
Q: Any chances for more type 10 versions for Japanese tech tree since Japan ground tree stil have some issues and atleast additional top MBT would help players since theres like only 4 tanks for top tier?
Prototype 4 should be cool idea since we got Type-90 B in game already.
Q: Will you add the last modification for the Ariete AMV (PT2, PT3)?
Q: Will you add more country so we player can play other country vehicle equipment?
Q: Can you please add who is operating each machine gun in the x-ray? It will be a small but nice addition.
The yak 141 is not the first vtol fighter to be supersonic, its the mirage balzac. The yak 141 first flight was in 1987, the mirage's was in 1965.
he probably meant the first VTOL aircraft that could supercruise.
Q: Did you guys rework the new gun sounds for all weapons because the SU-25 sounded different but I love it
Q: can you guys do a triathlon for early jet bombers?
The first ever supersonic VTOL was mirage 3V
Q:will you be adding the btr 80a/btr 82a, they would be a long awaited addition to the russian tech tree.
I would rather the bigger tech trees [mostly Russia] to not get new vehicles until the smaller trees get fleshed out more it feels like they are being led behind.
If only y’all would have made the Leopard 2 PSO a tech tree vehicle instead of an event vehicle
Nobody said anything that its goin to be a event vehicle ?
Q: How do IR guided missiles calculate lead? Radar ones get distance data from their guidance system and can therefore calculate lead, but how do IR missiles do it if they can't get the distance data to their target.
When it comes to sidewinders, I believe there is a natural lead effect thats produced by detecting the *change in target position since last observation* as opposed to the actual position itself. So the AIM-9 detects the target, determines if its how many degrees from the centre of its seeker, and deviates depending on that change in position in order to maintain a constant angle between itself and the target.
Are you guys gonna do a triathlon between the last piston engined fighters?
Could you pit the Hunters together to see which one has one advantage over another?
Q: Will you add the Bundeswehr Luchs Panzer at 7.0?
Could you in a next episode explain the A cap in pve helicopters so many ppl don't know that you have to return to a friendly airfield.. or change (Land on any pad) to return to friendly airfield ...!;)
10:58 not the finish leopards 😭
Q: when the Sturmtiger will come back? It will be on event?
Likely not. I doubt they will bring it back at all.
I like the new Yak :) someone tried to bomb my tank with it but i'm a pro at using the "J" button ;D
When i see CAS i just J out at the right moment to make them lose all their bombs without getting a kill xD
No skill = No grind :D
"the german one is the most numerous"
>only 2 tech tree top MBT, 3 if you include 2PL x)
xD i laughed hard when he tried to make the 2 a6 look like a new vehicle in the Video lmao
How to use the Red tops missiles on the lightning f.6?
Is There any chance we will get The Lopard 2A7V one day? Since there are so many Variants of the M1 and the Challanger. And the German Puma usually have "Spike" Atgms.
Spike ATGMs would be too overpowered right now, which is why it wasn't added originally anyway.
More top tier MBTs for Germany are likely coming soon, most notably the 2A5PSO which I think will be in the next event.
The Merkava Mk.4's armor is very nerfed in War Thunder, it should be completly invulnerable to 3BM42.
Q: will there ever be a system where you can gift your friends Silver Lions
Could you show a comparison of different landing gears? Like the fastest and slowest to extend and retract?
T-80BVM has bias so it’s actually the best
Q: Will there be new Russian Tanks and decals that were used in Russia's Invasion of Ukraine?
I don’t think they should add the decals 💀
Bruh ussr got enough tanks for now. Germany on the other hand defenitly needs a third top Tier tank.
judging by the fact they blocked new player's access to number decals and are trying to avoid politics as much as possible, i dont think so lmao
q:will there ever be any yugoslavian tanks or planes in the game, like in the soviet tech tree?
Q: Will you ever fix the Leclerc's reload, armor and turret traverse?
Will there be ever the AC-130 Gunship or B2 Bomber added?
As much as I would love for these to be a game unfortunately, they would mostly be useful only in ground realistic battles. However, the B2 might stand a chance to at least bomb one base given. Radar missiles will be useless against it.
@@steakinbacon8593 Yeah firstly that what the AC130 is for, so i could not be in the techtree, but an second option for the big drones
Q: Will Indian Jets or Variations be added?
Hal Prachand.