Best ivermectin meta analysis
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 июн 2021
- Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection
A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines
journals.lww.com/americanther...
Background
The antiparasitic ivermectin, with antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, has now been tested in numerous clinical trials.
A 2018 application for ivermectin use for scabies gives a direct cost of $2.90 for 100 12-mg tablets.
Most trials were registered, self-funded, and undertaken by clinicians
We assessed
Efficacy of ivermectin treatment in reducing mortality
Chemoprophylaxis
Data sources
Databases up to April 25, 2021
Sifted for studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias
Meta-analyses were conducted and certainty of the evidence was assessed
GRADE approach
training.cochrane.org/grade-a...
bestpractice.bmj.com/info/too...
GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations)
Reproducible and transparent framework for grading certainty in evidence
100 organisations worldwide officially endorsing GRADE
GRADE has four levels of evidence, certainty in evidence
very low
low
moderate
high
Decreasing confidence
Risk of bias
Imprecision
Inconsistency
Indirectness
Publication bias
Increases confidence
Very large magnitude of effect
Clear dose-response gradient
Residual confounding is likely to decrease rather than increase the magnitude of effect
Data sources
24 randomized controlled trials
N = 3,406 participants
Ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin
Meta-analysis of 15 trials (n = 2,438)
Average risk ratio 0.38
Moderate-certainty evidence
(Confirmed using DerSimonian-Laird method and Biggerstaff-Tweedie method)
Ivermectin verses no ivermectin in hospital patients
Ivermectin, 2.3%
No ivermectin, 7.8%
Ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection
3 trials, n = 738
Average reduction 86%
Low-certainty evidence
(due to study design limitations and few included trials)
Clearly favored ivermectin use
improvement
deterioration
Severe adverse events
Rare among treatment trials
Evidence of no difference was assessed as low certainty
Conclusions
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin.
Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing
to severe disease.
The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
Current NIH recommendations
www.covid19treatmentguideline...
there are insufficient data to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19
The sample size of most of the trials was small
Various doses and schedules of ivermectin were used
Some of the randomized controlled trials were open-label
Patients received various concomitant (confounding) medications (e.g., doxycycline, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc, corticosteroids)
The severity of COVID-19 in the study participants was not always well described
The study outcome measures were not always clearly defined
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 (April, 2021)
www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/...
Lovely comment by a RUclipsr who asked why doctors wouldn’t use the effective and cheap drug ivermectin. As she said “it just doesn’t make cents”
Money talks very good point good comment Janet best from Glasgow scotland stay safe
LOL.
So very true, and I'm pinching that.
It has to make dollars before the government types will agree to approve or recommend it.
classic!
The government of Indonesia has ordered the Indonrsian pharmaceutical company to produce a massive amount of ivermectine to save the people of Indonesia. I think they are very wise!!!
It's about time the UK gave it here.
@@deborahwhitney9427 I don't understand what is the real reason why EU countries do not want to apply it.
@@deborahwhitney9427 Well said Deborah it's a scandal best from Glasgow 👍
@@alatsaf it is all about money and profits over saving lives.
Parts of India and Mexico City population were administered ivermectin, vitamin C, D3 and zinc in a package delivered to people that were positive in Mexico.
Cases went down in both locations
I am a 65 y.o. male and was diagnosed with COVID back in jan. 2021. My symtoms were being tired, loss of appitite, head pain and congestion. I was asked by the doctor at the clinic if i would take a pescription, and i said yes, as long as its not something polititions are pushing. I was given one for an antibiotic and one for a two dose Ivermectin. After the second dose of Ivermectin my symtoms vanished completly!!!
Anecdotal is not empirical. My doctors use empirical, not anecdotal.
the problem is Ivermetcin in small doses isn't going to do anything. Your antibiotics probably did more than Ivermectin.
It's not going to work that fast. You are either lying, OR, you might not have had Covid or not a very severe case of it. Being tired, loss of appetite, head pain and congestion is not the only symptoms of Covid. Are you sure you didn't get a false positive test result? That can happen. Which test did they do?
Even if there's insufficient data, there's virtually no downside to using it at all. It's dirt cheap, already used all over the world and seems to have some positive interaction of a variety of levels from the docking component to protease inhibition. The saying of never ascribe to malice what can be explained due to stupidity doesn't apply when there's hundreds of billions of dollars on the line for companies that have knowingly bought up most of the worlds governments influence.
The same companies that shut down HIV treatment medication production in Africa in the 80s because they were using their intellectual property to produce a no name version of the meds for 1/20th the cost (at no profit). They were willing to let tens of million of Africans die over a patent they barely even used in the first world. What makes anyone think these companies who have the largest class action lawsuits of all time over death/complications from medications against them, should be considered trust worthy in regards to their incentives is beyond me.
But that would end the pandemic and their plans for a vaccine passport that requires government permission just to go to the shops. Maybe that's what they really want?
Very encouraging and the Oxford University study into Ivermectin promised in February and cancelled for unknown reasons is now finally going ahead. If it shows Ivermectin to be effective then there should be a public enquiry into why this was delayed.
The Oxford study allows treatment start two weeks after symptoms. It is possible it will be too late for ivermectin to show good efficacy when that late. So that is by design. Was it also on purpose to show poor results?
@@rikkshow spot on rikk, 14 days after symptoms start is far too late, they're making sure that the efficacy is inconclusive, same as The Lancett did with HCQ
Guaranteed Oxford will kneecap their “study” on this efficacious, safe, inexpensive long time drug now repurposed successfully all over the world for Covid-19. I’d be shocked if they did a truthful analysis. They’ll pan it in the slyest, sneakiest of ways. Fortunately, John Campbell, Tess Lawrie, Pierre Kory, Paul Marik, and a host of other pandemic heroes will show them up and rip them apart if they do. Guaranteed.
The Oxford "RECOVERY" trial for Hydroxychloroquine used lethal doses of the drug, far too late into the illness. I have little confidence in them.
LOL you still think justice will come about through law or words
The Silence is Deafening... Indeed.
The Silence is...deadening....
The silence is criminally negligent...
hardly.
History rhyming. Now we all understand how the holocaust was allowed to happen by ordinary people.
@@gavin4848 the Holocaust? Really? You goddamned clown :D
John, the service you have offered over the past year has been without parallel. The skill you show disseminating complex and occasionally controversial information has been exquisite! Thank you for giving the time you have. You fully deserve your million + subscribers..
A medical Dr debunked your interpretation of a meta-analysis on ivermectin.
It's dangerous to be creating discussing your own opinion. Medical doctors and other professionals are debunking your opinions.
he's also been debunked by a medical doctor.
ruclips.net/video/pOjpo8vLfSo/видео.html
He's lying to you.
Just got covid symptoms last Thursday.\ Tested on Saturday and took Ivermectin Saturday and Sunday. Thursday and Friday had extreme fatigue and aches and pains in legs. Sunday those symptoms gone completely. Now just a head cold and am taking mucinex and Vitamin D. Me 75 yr old U.S. male with diabetes, hi B/P, and HI Cholesterol . I thought I needed some extra help. No after effects.
So happy this is now published. I know these physicians have been trying for many months to have this meta analysis published. We now have a treatment for Covid that cannot be denied!
Great comment dian well put best from Glasgow scotland 👍
We already had one, dexamethasone. This would just be one more.
But it will be denied, Merck who originally held the patent for Ivermetin have been awarded a contract worth millions to come up with an effective theraputic against covid, what they will undoubtedly do is change something irrelevant in the Ivermectin molecule in order to be able to aquire a new patent and they will sell this at vastly inflated prices.
Oscar Swida True but this would be the first early treatment and prophylactic for the viral stage and not just a treatment for the organised pneumonia stage.
You are aware that the uk government have announced a full double blind randomised trial which is the gold standard for testing drug efficacy.
About 6 months ago there were a few positive studies. Everyone ignored them.
Stiill are.
@dan klassen is that doctor of nursing? PhD not Md?
Not me. Been on the FLCCC recommended dosage for about 8 mos. with no side effects and no covid, had a couple negative tests. Have one year supply remaining, which ought to do it.
It takes a lot of studies, or a study with a large sample size, to have high confidence that is works. Sample sizes are still too small to correct for sampling error, placebo effects and confounding variables.
@@dinohall2595 Large numbers of smaller studies is far more empirically accurate than one or two large studies -
Probably should be updated that co-author of this Meta-Analysis, Dr Andrew Hill on Aug 16 2021 said; “Our meta-analysis of survival for ivermectin had to be retracted after one of the main studies was suspected of medical fraud. With the revised version, there is no statistically significant survival benefit for ivermectin. So the original version should not be quoted”
Fat chance of an update. Despite the pretense to objectivity, Campbell is more interested in catering to the contrarian crowd.
Wrong study dude! This the Bryant and Lawrie et al. study, not Hill.
@@mrdolinman I wonder if this study also relies on the Elgazzar data.
Oh, it does. Big surprise there.
@@HarryS77 Not sure what you math skills are like, but you may also want to read Neil and Fenton's Bayesian analysis of the studies.
@@mrdolinman I don't know what your reading skills are like, but the Elgazzar study is widely reported to be fraudulent. Analyses which rely on it or on small, poorly-conducted studies don't count for much. No amount of Bayesian fiddling matters if the priors are poor, which in this case they are. Using a Bayesian analysis of poor quality information to "prove" that ivermectin works seems very dubious.
so much more open and respectful than wikipedia, let alone the axegrinders.
Funny how the best reporting in the last year has come from doctors, professors, podcasters, retired medical personnel and citizen journalists…
NOT professional journalists!
yes and not by active doctors, I am one..ICU doctor and ivermectin does not work..its not money but our experience which force us to use other drugs..people are stupid they think doctors do everything for money, NOPE, we do everything for our patiens and I will never give my patients an ineffective drug = ivermectin
Also, as someone on the ICU, what does seem to work? Is there any treatment that shows promise, maybe steroids? For sure ICU doctors have learned a lot in the last year of what works and what doesn't?
@@Jakubescu So the Oxford study was just started for the heck of it? No disrespect but maybe by the time yourself gets hold of these people in ICU its already too late for IVM to be effective and im pretty sure even if you have administered this medication it would sure be at a stage far too late than what its being suggested for, just my 2c...
@@Jakubescu that's disingenuous. Active doctors are using it and swearing by it. Check out Dr Pierre Cory and his team at FLCCC
@@dunxy Where did you get your medical degree again?
There's no profit margin, so our politicians won't want the contracts for their friends, they will wait until there is a more profitable alternative.
Yes its all about the dollar or pound.
ruclips.net/video/9bi8rmvJfkE/видео.html&feature=share
In this case I think the politicians are nothing but puppets being dangled by Big Pharma. Which, come to think of it, is pretty common outside of medicine as well.
@@RussCR5187 they have always been that. Covid just shows how far they would take it and the answer is until ☠️
I'm not convinced our politicians are that smart... Risk management is their game: risk to themselves, off course 8|
The main thing we get out of all this, is that ivermectin isn't a silver bullet.
The mega data is only as good as the information it's given, and most of the information going in is not great.
Thank you for being so objective in your analysis and delivery of the data. We need more of you in these times.
Thanks for being courageous and talking about this despite the pressure against it. I appreciate your integrity.
Integrity?
Healthy people do not need testing or treating
c19ivermectin.com
dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/24/crimes-against-humanity-uk-government-release-21st-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/
For those of us who have been deemed medically unfit for the vaccine (by medical professionals).. This is good news!! And I find it irresponsible by the medical profession that this is not discussed in general or alternatives researched for those of us in this category!!
It is criminal Madeleine. But i'm afraid they dont want the vaccine hesitants to have a choice because once its out and available their vaccine profits go down.
Very good news for you mad best from Glasgow 👍
@@wboyle9721 Glasgow is a Two Bit Hack compared to Ross, Boyle!
You're being charitable by calling it irresponsible. The story of IVM is a saga of criminal collusion between governments, pharma corps, NGOs, and the scientific community (as it is).
“I” determined I was medically unfit to take an experimental injection!
Thank you for being so brave sir! We need more doctors like you.
Thank you John. To hear plain honest commentary on this subject is refreshing. Look forward to the next instalment.
Thank You Dr. Campbell!
Please stay on the topic of Ivermectin.
Many lives still can be saved.
I Mask+ protocol helped my family to deal with COVID infection.
Thank You again
👍 👍 👍
Used it myself and many of
my friend, neighbors and family members used it with great success. All recovered.
Yes, this protocol saved my husband’s life. So thankful for doctors that are willing to stand up for what’s right regardless of how they are made to look by the media.
Ivermectin 48 mg und Olivenöl 10 ml für 3 Tage, Albendazol 2400 mg und Olivenöl 50 ml für 4 Tage, Quercetin Resveratrol egcg Meformin 1000 ml Berberin Omega 3 Curcumin täglich. Essen Sie 3 Tage lang.. nach dem Abendessen 15 Gramm liposomales Vitamin C, 100 mg Doxycyclin und 500 mg Azithromycin.. Wenn Sie täglich 1 Stunde lang ein heißes Halbbad nehmen, können Sie Krebs heilen. 3.5mg naltrexon 5000iu vitamid jedentag.Der Arzt sagte mir, ich solle mein Leben in einem Monat organisieren. Ich habe das in 6 Monaten gemacht. abgeschlossen. Die Heilungsrate von Krebsmedikamenten beträgt etwa 3%. Wenn es nach 5 Jahren wiederkehrt, sterben alle. Ivermectin Albendazol tötet Krebsstammzellen. kein rezidiv.....in korea gibt es viele menschen, die krebs mit dieser methode heilen. sehr schnell und ohne Nebenwirkungen.....
12-48mg ivermectin 100mg doxycyclin 50mg zinc cure covid 19 for7days(500mg quercetin.5g liposomal vitaminc)
man can take upto 96mg ivermectin a day ..20days straightly. cancer patients in korea took experiments. he took 120mg a day for 20 days straightly to cure the terminal cancer...
vaccines can not prevent delta variants..igg antibodies does not lasts forever.
ivernom from india. it is just 0.3 dollars for 12mg. lots of korean take this. ivernom(ivermectin from india)
48mg ivermectin(1.2dollars) a day cures cancer very well. even double efficacy than keytruda(5000 dollars once) that is the reason why doctors do not use ivermectin. they can get 2000 dollars at once with keytruda.....
@@gallerhome Rita, same here. My son 18 got sick first and I put him on the protocol a bit late as we did not know that it was Covid. He was very sick the first few days. We all started the protocol. My wife and daughter got it as well but elatively easy going. I was the care taker and took NO precaution at all. (it is my family and I am not going to scare them any more that they are). I had almost no symptoms and tested negative. Boyfriend of my daughter got very sick, after I gave him the protocol he recovered in a day! All his family got it, father (fat) took the protocol and recovered after a few weeks. Mother did not take it, had to go to hospital. All recovered.
you did a video about ivermectin in use against covid in Mexico that was very well done/carried out and it showed a much higher rate of success.
My wife and did not vax, nor did we get covid. I had 7 friends get the Delta August 2021. 5 were double vaxxed. None were taking zinc. My wife and I were taking zinc, C, and D. Two got old school doc to prescribe ivermectin. They said it was like a miracle. Knocked out the Delta in hours.
i took care of a family member in a covid room of a hospital for 8 days. my swab test results were both negative before and after my stay at the hospital. i just took ivermectin human grade as a prophylaxis. no vaccine needed. it works really. stay healthy alive guys....
Where did you get the prophylaxis and how much / how long did you take it for?
Lots of other studies show the efficacy in numerous trials. No excuse for the exclusion except for $ in pocket of Pharma and social manipulation due to hyped up fear
They knew about it March 2020
And, of course, the fact that not enough evidence is in yet.
@@dinohall2595 And the fact that the only evidence that would apparently satisfy as 'enough' evidence can ONLY be provided by BIG PHARMA, who are going out of their way to attempt to ensure that evidence doesn't surface. Coincidence, you reckon??
@@fransmith3255 Is Merck NOT Big Pharma? Because they make Ivermectin and will undoubtedly profit from it if it is used en masse, the world over. And even THEY advise against using Ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
@@dinohall2595 there is an abundance of evidence, anyone paying attention knows that. There is absolutely no money in it whatsoever in regards to your Merck comment. It’s literally as a couple of cents a dose. New anti virals and vax’s are 8-$2000 to treat/ vax. Both of your statements are vastly ill informed.
Congratulations Dr John. Been a daily watcher since Jan 2020. Been trying to get people to tell others so they could get the solid science you so unbiasedly present without politics. One million! Well done sir.
One million subscribers and only 650 comments, they're all dead from his I'll vaccine advise.
@@keywee849 they are not dead. Some are listening, learning and weighing in on such an important issue.
@@lydiachee4800 bs
Ivermectin 48 mg und Olivenöl 10 ml für 3 Tage, Albendazol 2400 mg und Olivenöl 50 ml für 4 Tage, Quercetin Resveratrol egcg Meformin 1000 ml Berberin Omega 3 Curcumin täglich. Essen Sie 3 Tage lang.. nach dem Abendessen 15 Gramm liposomales Vitamin C, 100 mg Doxycyclin und 500 mg Azithromycin.. Wenn Sie täglich 1 Stunde lang ein heißes Halbbad nehmen, können Sie Krebs heilen. 3.5mg naltrexon 5000iu vitamid jedentag.Der Arzt sagte mir, ich solle mein Leben in einem Monat organisieren. Ich habe das in 6 Monaten gemacht. abgeschlossen. Die Heilungsrate von Krebsmedikamenten beträgt etwa 3%. Wenn es nach 5 Jahren wiederkehrt, sterben alle. Ivermectin Albendazol tötet Krebsstammzellen. kein rezidiv.....in korea gibt es viele menschen, die krebs mit dieser methode heilen. sehr schnell und ohne Nebenwirkungen.....
12-48mg ivermectin 100mg doxycyclin 50mg zinc cure covid 19 for7days(500mg quercetin.5g liposomal vitaminc)
man can take upto 96mg ivermectin a day ..20days straightly. cancer patients in korea took experiments. he took 120mg a day for 20 days straightly to cure the terminal cancer...
vaccines can not prevent delta variants..igg antibodies does not lasts forever.
ivernom from india. it is just 0.3 dollars for 12mg. lots of korean take this. ivernom(ivermectin from india)
48mg ivermectin(1.2dollars) a day cures cancer very well. even double efficacy than keytruda(5000 dollars once) that is the reason why doctors do not use ivermectin. they can get 2000 dollars at once with keytruda.......
I feel like some of the people in the comments section didn’t really watch the video. These numbers are nowhere near the vaccine numbers in terms of efficacy.
62 percent for pennies on the dollar. No one said the efficacy was as high just that this shouldn't be mocked or ignored
But vaccine plus ivermectin… why not use everything you have at your disposal?
@@thedavephan exactly! Especially since there are breakthrough infections.
However, this is a medical treatment, not a experimental vaccine. - Which governments don't want to release the issues arising from the vaccine.
@Ryan K Are you sure? I think that is conjecture.
Thank you Dr. Campbell, as always you are thorough, dispassionate, and unbiased.
When Indian doctors were using it wide scale they got a lot of backlash. Let that sink in.
From whom?
Vitimin d invermectin mouthwashes no money no interest best from Glasgow
They got backlash because they were saving lifes during wildfire/buzzsaw event. They used something cheap. That was their mistake. Using their position to save lifes. It is truly unbelievable. Imagine people who lost their young, healthy, baby brother to covid-19 when he could have been potentially saved by doctors doing their job. How upset would a person be?
Anyone can say anything on here. Let that sink in.
Then why do they have so many deaths?
On a side note - what's the difference between between a conspiracy theory and the truth ?
Answer: about a year.
@@christopherrobinson7541 Of hard labour? Well, if thinking is hard labour for you..
@@christopherrobinson7541 lol! ...Sorry christopher...now I see the brilliance of your comment...lol... I think I need more coffee...( at least that's the excuse I'll use...).
Actual answer: about three weeks. Source www.sciencealert.com/ivermectin-study-controversy-is-a-huge-wake-up-call-for-fraud-in-covid-19-science
Who exactly was spouting conspiracy theories again?
More like about 6 months now
6 months
Dr John, this meta analysis contains the influential Elgazzar paper that has since been retracted and thoroughly discredited.
Resource?
@@TheTebhes "Retraction Watch", among others. RUclips will not let me post the link.
@@currawong60911368 RUclips will love it because all liberals are against everything but what WHO supports. You just post it.
@@TheTebhes News Flash - I'm not a liberal... Possibly on some spectrum that means I have to point out sketchy info though, regardless of what side of politics it comes from. Our divisive media would do well to do the same. Not sure YT will love it? Its old news, but not widely publicized. And, I salute your effort to check the source yourself. Wish more were like you, regardless of the topic at hand.
@@currawong60911368 Crazy how any dissenting opinion will get the mob to lift their pitchforks. Reading this comment section is actually scary. It's amazing that we are all using the internet which is full of the answers to any question we could ask- but 99% of the people in these comments have decided what their answers are and have zero interest in digging deeper.
It’s amazing how much it’s helped even at such low doses, its hard to imagine how fantastically successful it would be if people were treated with a more appropriate dosage
The Wikipedia entry for ivermectin classifies reports of its efficacy against COVID-19 as misinformation. Dr. Campbell could offer an in-depth commentary of the Wikipedia entry along with the citations.
I fear that "Big Brother" has been meddling with Wikipedia entries.
What's the point almost all media is controlled by a select few people including Wikipedia, every person that's ever mentioned anything other than vaccines is made out to be a complete crazy conspiracy theorist and Dr John knows this, even he is aware of the bullshit that's coming along with where sars-cov2 came from!!.
I feel very sorry for people like him and many others who can't say shit without getting banned from RUclips because hell Google ain't exactly innocent in this whirlwind of bullshit
Wikipedia has little to do with unbiased facts..
@@jonz23m those like pelosi incite violence claiming russia hack election just cover up fact she/mccain types rigged 2000 to 2012 for killing 7 countries 5 years wesley clark leaked memo=ruclips.net/video/_mrJRHwbVG8/видео.html
👍 👍
I love the way that the most important thing to John is giving the most up to date info for the benefit of the people. He never tries to do things for the benefit of his own channel. He doesn't spin out a story to get more watch time and more benefits from you tube. He doesn't even run adds or try to monetize things he recommends. He just tries to be helpful. Much respect.
TROOOOO 😷 👍
Well said
How do you know, I get ads all the time.
A medical Dr debunked your interpretation of a meta-analysis on ivermectin.
It's dangerous to be creating discussing your own opinion. Medical doctors and other professionals are debunking your opinions.
@Deborah Curtis he's also been debunked by a medical doctor.
ruclips.net/video/pOjpo8vLfSo/видео.html
Another professor debunked his interpretation of this meta-analysis.
He is not a Dr, he is a flake. Do not take his advice seriously.
I've been taking vitamin D and k2 for years, since the pandemic I added vitamin C and zinc.
A few days ago I developed a cough, I did wonder about it but didn't give it too much thought. By night time I also started to feel short of breath.
The next morning I woke up with quite severe chest pain and difficulty breathing, I panicked a little as it felt very serious. I had ivermectin on hand that I bought months ago, so I took 18mg.
Throughout the day the chest pain persisted, breathing was difficult, I kept having to lift my arms up over my head and breathe deeply to feel like I was getting enough oxygen.
I went to bed early, when I woke up the chest pain was all but completely gone, breathing was normal, and the cough was gone. This was 17 hours after 1 ivermectin dose. About 4 or 5 hours after that, chest pain was now totally gone. 1 dose of ivermectin, all symptoms gone within 24 hours.
To be clear, I have no idea if what I had was covid, but I had a very serious respiratory issue, I had never had chest pain and trouble breathing like that before. And 24 hours after 18mg of ivermectin it was gone.
I can't say for sure what was related to what, but the above is what happened.
I should also add, the ivermectin I used was intended for animals.
Next time you have severe chest pain call ambulance - it could be a heart attack
Thank you,I remember during the height of the pandemic Doctors going to Washington DC and begging other Doctors to try it
Congratulations on 1 MILLION!!! I’ve been watching you for a year and a half now and I can’t think of anyone who deserves it more! ❤️🙌🏼
As another doctor recently remarked, "Ivermectin affects a vital human organ: the wallet." Ivermectin - if it turns out to be safe and efficient - would not just make little profit. It could actually diminish profits from patented and expensive vaccines and therapeutics.
I would say the big pharma bosses and the politicians who have gone along with this ignoring of/discrediting Ivermectin as a readily available and cheap cure - should go to jail,
It’s all about the $
Dr. Pierre Kory ;)
This is a terrible conspiracy given that Dexamethasone is also cheap and off-patent and accepted everywhere as an effective treatment.
@@unclefatbloke687 Just make sure they're being injected with their own product rather than getting the saline solution option.
Thank you so much for your continued factual information. I look forward to your frequent updates on all things new with the illness, the shots and the possible/probable treatments.
For anyone who is curious. Dr Campbell is actually a nurse , not a medical doctor. His doctoral degree is in philosophy. Just something to consider.
60% efficacy is still 10 basis points better than the annual 'flu jab.
Flu vaccinations are another scam.
10 basis points = 0.1 percent, not 10 percent.
@@outofbluepills 100 basis points better. :)
proper dosage and treatment would raise the efficacy further
Seen, studying trails, all above 92%, real well done trails. Most above 96%
I never imagined I would become your student . Never imagined you would be my covid pandemic teacher. Never imagined I would learn so much from you. With gratitude. Thank you
The study from Egypy included in this meta-analysis conducted by Theresa Lawrie and others has been withdrawn, faulty data and plagiarism.
Real time meta-analysis of ivermectin studies (Up to date as of 20/7/21, excludes Elgazzar 2020): ivmmeta.com
Thank you very much for this video Dr. Campbell. You provided a brilliant commentary! Here in Australia, the use of ivermectin for the treatment of covid-19 is not supported. MP Craig Kelly was openly talking about studies on ivermectin and was questioning why Australian health authorities are against the use of ivermectin as a treatment of covid-19. He was ridiculed by mainstream media and, later on, Facebook deleted his Facebook page because of "medical desinformation". Hopefully, in the face to mounting evidence, things will change in Australia and around the world ?
You cannot criticize a man who admits upfront he doesnt understand some utterly complex statistical analysis. It just adds to the credibility of his ultimate / final opinion on the matter.
What John does is a presentation of FACTS. He never says, do this, buy this, drink that... it's still depending on what's best for our own bodies. After all, we are all unique and when it comes to health, THERE IS NO, ONE SIZE-FITS ALL!
At this time, with more than a billion vaccines administered worldwide, the efficacy still outweighs the risks.
Ivermectin 48 mg und Olivenöl 10 ml für 3 Tage, Albendazol 2400 mg und Olivenöl 50 ml für 4 Tage, Quercetin Resveratrol egcg Meformin 1000 ml Berberin Omega 3 Curcumin täglich. Essen Sie 3 Tage lang.. nach dem Abendessen 15 Gramm liposomales Vitamin C, 100 mg Doxycyclin und 500 mg Azithromycin.. Wenn Sie täglich 1 Stunde lang ein heißes Halbbad nehmen, können Sie Krebs heilen. 3.5mg naltrexon 5000iu vitamid jedentag.Der Arzt sagte mir, ich solle mein Leben in einem Monat organisieren. Ich habe das in 6 Monaten gemacht. abgeschlossen. Die Heilungsrate von Krebsmedikamenten beträgt etwa 3%. Wenn es nach 5 Jahren wiederkehrt, sterben alle. Ivermectin Albendazol tötet Krebsstammzellen. kein rezidiv.....in korea gibt es viele menschen, die krebs mit dieser methode heilen. sehr schnell und ohne Nebenwirkungen.....
12-48mg ivermectin 100mg doxycyclin 50mg zinc cure covid 19 for7days(500mg quercetin.5g liposomal vitaminc)
man can take upto 96mg ivermectin a day ..20days straightly. cancer patients in korea took experiments. he took 120mg a day for 20 days straightly to cure the terminal cancer...
vaccines can not prevent delta variants..igg antibodies does not lasts forever.
ivernom from india. it is just 0.3 dollars for 12mg. lots of korean take this. ivernom(ivermectin from india)
48mg ivermectin(1.2dollars) a day cures cancer very well. even double efficacy than keytruda(5000 dollars once) that is the reason why doctors do not use ivermectin. they can get 2000 dollars at once with keytruda....
Dr John has no ego, and reminds me of all the really clever people I've met, who were invariably humble about their own remarkable abilities.
Healthy people do not need testing or treating
c19ivermectin.com
dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/24/crimes-against-humanity-uk-government-release-21st-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/
@@daverok1113 Healthy people don't need to stuff themselves with an anti-parasitic drug.
Lives could have been saved..... the whole situation is unimaginable.... yet, there it is.
Just think of it this way: "They" do with us, what we do with farm animals. Just use them.
This is good explanation 👏 all people should start petition to their government to use this drug ..it only cost $0.40 cent just imagine how many people will be save
Considering most the of the studies for this meta analysis has been redacted for being fraudulent, maybe this needs to be revisited
"It's off license, it's generic, it can be manufactured in India in huge quantities."
Which is excellent. Because they happen to NEED huge quantities in India.
And it doesn’t work
@Kwistenbiebel200 it is false. Studies on ivermectin are generally low to fair quality, but almost all suggest that ivermectin is effective (again, take this with a grain of salt due to study qualities). There is very little evidence that suggests that ivermectin is ineffective. Elaniago doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
@Kwistenbiebel200 they already did. Their daily numbers have dropped 90% in a month since they did
@@Shelmerdine745 It doesn't? Hmm. So, it wouldn't be any worse than it is right now, correct? They could give everyone measured doses of something that doesn't work, and a certain amount of them would recover naturally, some would recovery because: psychosomatic. That should be, what, 6%? 8%?
If nothing else, that would buy time and order by reducing panic. They could give it out with paper masks - "Take this today. In two days, discard this mask, and take your next dose with this second mask."
There you go... Compliance AND a few days of calm and order.
@@schwajj
I do know what I’m talking about. You say the studies “suggest” it is effective, but that simply is not good enough. You’d know that if you knew what you were talking about.
Well....... I guess I would rather take the advice of a clinician over the advice of a bureaucrat any day..... This just proves it..... THE WHO IS ABSOLUTELY SHOOTING THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT... They need to be defunded...
Saying that the WHO should be defunded is like saying the US military should be defunded after Pearl Harbor. The Generals/Admirals/Board/Management should be fired and replaced yes, but the organization as a whole has done much good in the past and can do much good in the future.
@@endintiers I stand by my original statement..... People who see patients and are in the thick of it are imminently more qualified to prescribe a corrective action than Bloated jerks who havent seen a patient in 25 years....... We can all take care o our selves and let these self serving jerks twist in the wind!!!
@@ncm55449 Which is what I am saying, get rid of the useless people but keep the useful organization.
Trump was right....again smh
Even if they are defined, there is a guy called Bill G8s who will give them money.
Ivermectin might help. But we already have a vaccine that absolutely, without a doubt helps. Why are people so anti vax but are okay with taking another drug with little testing for the treatment of covid 19?
I appreciate you just reviewing this because it's been in question. I think there should be more studies done on this. I know people who swear by it.
If this comes out to be the case I want a forensic investigation into why some of the top health experts refuse to look at this drug, that was brought up in April last year, when in the US there wasn’t even 30,000 deaths yet. This would be criminal in my opinion along with Facebook/social media blocking Dr.’s for talking about it.
Unfortunately you can't beat the 'system'. Trump tried to 'drain the swamp', and look what happened to him. He didn't even draw a President's salary in trying to do so. No other president has taken the job with no salary, as far as I know, yet that's his reward from the swamp dwellers.
They literally hate ivermectin for 2 reasons: Trump said it might work (and they can't have that be true and they can't even admit it after installing their toilet) and if it does keep people from getting sick the vaccines lose emergency use authorization and a bunch of corrupt leftist elites lose billions of dollars.
Because it works for a majority of cases.
Follow the money.....
@@sajjie8121
So tragic right. USA lost its real chance for greatness.
Lets face it, anyone still listening to the WHO are probably not too bright.
Probably the only one listening to the WHO at this stage is Dr Fauci
@Brett Hough I don't like Trump but at least the guy was talking about hydroxi and taking the US out of the WHO.
This is nothing to do with a virus it’s just the rich getting extremely rich.We’ve not had a good old war for a while which is another great money maker.The “virus” is second best
@@Madmax-iy8fi gr8 point!
@@Whereisshellymiscavige unfortunately,most Governments, especially in US and Europe listen to them.
For the record, "moderate-certainty" is extremely good.
no it is not. It just means that there needs to be more research done. Moderate quality of evidence means there is moderate confidence in the estimated effect: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimated effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. The key words being "Likely" and "Possibility".
Whereas high quality of evidence means there is a lot of confidence that the true effect lies close to that of the estimated effect.
Great Lecture Dear Dr. John Campbell! Very comprehensive. Very Admirable! God Bless You!
My family is a perfect example. My family of four got covid in December of 2020. We were all proscribed vitamins and a steroid and ivermectin. But the pharmacy only had enough for 2 scripts. So I had my son and wife to take it. As my wife was the worst at the time. My wife recovered quickly and my son only lost taste and smell. My health fell quickly with crazy heart rates up and down. But a few days later I got the meds and recovered quickly with in 48 hrs.
Fantastic e doza best wishes from Glasgow l
What dose did you take? And for how long?
@@sr.liamthegreat6461 i think is was 15mg for 10 days
@@edoza7950 thank you
@@wboyle9721 Thank you from the US
Clearly Chris Whitty should comment - he is well aware of the treatment having written a paper on it and declaring it a safe treatment!
That would interfere with his vaccine investments
Yes, he wrote that paper in 2010, seen the evidence, funny how he didn't mention it.
Governments take notes poorer countries are struggling with vaccines surely this is an alternate treatment to get this pandemic finished and wipe these variants off the face of the earth to some extent virus will always be here but more treatments will make it less dangerous best from Glasgow scotland stay safe
His best defence is to say nothing. But will surely need a good lawyer soon…..
@@wboyle9721 United States govt can’t take notice or they need to pull the vaccines since emergency use not allowed if a treatment another treatment is available. That’s why they have attempted to bury this information. And discredit people along the way .. so sad and evil actually
Thank you kindly for bringing this to everyone's attention. There is no longer a reason not to apply this powerful tool.
It would be great to have a video addressing the impact that the discredited Elgazzar study has on the findings of this meta-analysis and also one going through the Cochrane meta-analysis.
Still waiting for him to address this very important topic, meanwhile in the US, ivermectin supplies at animal feed stores are running out
@@allanw I'm really disappointed at how he has been handling Ivermectin. He usually gives such good info, but his faith in ivermectin is incredibly concerning. I looked back and 6 months ago he did multiple interviews with one of the leaders of BIRD (British Ivermectin Recommendation Development) who has been pushing data from low quality trials.
@@kc6828 You are a liberal (public enemy) that's why you didn't listen him but you have an opinion about his speech.
@@TheTebhes I think you know what you can do with that feeling.
@@kc6828 There is no feeling around, just information. He talked about officially released information. You were disappointed by his impartial and naive presentation because you are a liberal.
Thank you so much for discussing treatments that should be accessible to all. It’s very interesting how certain treatments are being suppressed in some countries and moving towards experimental shots with no longitudinal data. Thank you for bringing this very important issue into the mainstream public domain. I too am hopeful that countries who have been trialling ivermectin and have had good success with it, will be able to share their data to the countries who are suppressing it. Thanks again
About time pray more people pay attention to this
you wont hear governments promoting it on media..
Campbell hasn't
Healthy people do not need testing or treating
c19ivermectin.com
dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/24/crimes-against-humanity-uk-government-release-21st-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/
This is a good educational video.
I watch this video 7times to understand GRADE
Any undergrad student can find it very useful
Thank you Doctor
Love from Bangladesh!
Skewed by a flawed Egyptian study that made up data and was retracted. Take that study out and it’s nada.
Thank you Dr John for covering this. It’s a shame that a lot of deaths could possibly have been prevented by using this cheap drug. I really believe the front line doctors who see these patients suffering and help them get through this disease should be listened to more.
the scientists and politicians are mostly trying to balance finance among other things rather than save lives unfortunately. Ivermectin along with the vaccines could possibly see the end of this pandemic, we can only live in hope.
It's not just a shame, it may in fact be criminal!
The deaths continue albeit from the experimental warp speed vaccines which Campbell has been marketing on this channel from the start
Healthy people do not need testing or treating
c19ivermectin.com
dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/24/crimes-against-humanity-uk-government-release-21st-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/
Dr Kory was speaking on BBC Radio 4 today.
Just listened again and it was not that positive.
Thanks for link Peter
Live? Id be suspicious of any edited content... but its a step in the right direction
He’s been on joe rogan too
Oh my goodness. The dam is BURSTING! AMAZING!!!
This is great news!!!
It wasn't edited, and he was very enthusiastic about Ivermectin.
Doc you need to update.
That's right John, and thank you for explaining this study. If more people would've taken a serious listen to Bret Weinstein & Heather Heying, whom both tried very hard to push the CONCEPT of Ivermectin as prophylaxis, we might be in a slightly different situation now.
Please keep us posted on other Ivermectin peer reviewed studies and god bless :)
Good to hear. Honest unbiased reporting.
Funny how the best reporting in the last year has come from doctors, professors, podcasters and citizen journalists.
NOT from professional journalists!
Grats on 1 million subs Doc!
This video should probably get an update, since the youtube algorithm is still recommending it and the strongest "evidence" in this meta analysis comes from a retracted paper with faked data.
It's always a good idea to remember that emergency use authorization for Covid-19 vaccines CANNOT be permitted if there exists ANY safe alternatives!
Great that this finally seen light of day.
Well done on a million subs dr 👏 amazing 😍
Just started a course of ivermectin. Had serious long covid symptons of heart palpitations, dizziness and pains in arms and legs. Day 2 and feeling like symptons have subsided now. Have to see if they return but seems effective to me.
Hi Minella, Are you taking it on daily basis, and the dose? How are you feeling now in respect to your LC symptoms? thanks
\
@@rashidm65 i only needed two tablets 15mg. Can get poisoned if you take to much.
@@sauljoesphwiggin Thank you so much for your prompt response. If I understood correctly, you were taking 30 mg (2 x 15 mg =30 mg) daily. Right? I have long COVID symptoms and planing to take ivermectin. Just a few questions--
Are you still continuing ivermectin? Did it (IVM) help to subside the symptoms and any relapse? Do I need to be on some other medication/supplements (Vitamins, minerals, fluvoxamine, pravastatin, etc.) and/or special diet (e.g., low histamine diet, tea, coffee, etc.) based on your experience.
Thank you, again.
He added: "The few existing higher quality clinical trials testing ivermectin against the disease uniformly have failed to find a positive result. It’s only the smaller, lower-quality trials that have been positive. This is a good indication that the drug probably doesn’t work."
Wonderful such a shame so many deaths without taking a right to try Ivm
I agree Bob fantastic comment best wishes from Glasgow scotland
It's evil that they have blocked meds that would of saved lives
This looks like large amount of people now have a realization ivermecton definitely works,
Now whats going on with governments that they're not shouting about it,?
@@michaelryan6907 we all suspected that Michael best from Glasgow scotland
They do this but so many blindly trust them over the vaccines. www.brusselstimes.com/news/belgium-all-news/175055/delta-variant-ravages-care-home-55-infected-12-dead/
Cochrane refused to publish Tess Lawrie's study without giving any reason, despite ALL of their methodology being followed to the letter.
Same with all the other major journals, despite it being so limited in an apparent effort to overcome any possible objection they might raise.
Lancet can now safely be regarded as the gutter press they have made themselves into. It's their shame, they've worked hard for it, and nothing should be allowed to deny it to them.
Lancet has been gutter press ever since they published the(now withdrawn) "study" of HCQ. The "study" was totally fraudulent.
There was no study at all, but there was conspiracy among three doctors to commit scientific fraud that The lancet published.
Ryan Cole, MD, from Idaho, USA, has a video which explains why Ivermectin has been delayed, basically being because the only way the vaccines could get emergency use was to presuppose that there are no known treatments. #StoptheMandate. That was a huge insight, if true.
Research by the people for the people?.. Pleasant to hear.
Dr. Pierre Kory says getting high certainty is very hard and moderate is impressive. That was on Joe Rogan podcast #1671 on Spotify.
Not only that, but most recommended drugs used for infectious diseases did not meet a "high quality evidence" threshold. Here's what one doctor who is familiar with the grading systems said:
""Any physician walking around with the belief that infectious diseases is a specialty or clinical area guided predominantly by ‘high quality evidence’ is living in a fantasy world. Go through the Sanford Guide. Take note of the references that inform up-to-date recommendations. Examine the makeup of IDSA's guidelines and recommendations. It's predominantly guided by limited small RCTs at best, observational human studies and expert opinion most frequently.
"Reputable and authoritative medical consensus-making entities/professional medical societies have systems of scoring recommendations. G.R.A.D.E. for example. 1=informed by high quality randomized db trials. 2=RCTs with important limitations, or cohort studies. 3=case controls or limited cohort studies 4=case series, descriptive studies 5=expert opinion. A=strongly recommend B=recommend. You can have 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4B, etc. So, strong recommendations based on low-on-trial-hierarchy studies.
"What else would yield a strong recommendation if study design isn't strong? Safety, magnitude and precision of effect, reproducibility, cost, effectiveness of alternatives, societal impact of effective treatment, severity of illness vs risks/costs/burdens of treatment. Most guidelines/recs are 2A or lower. 1A represents "best practices" and "standards of care." Sweeping practice changing recs that you had better have a good reason NOT to do. Stroke, heart failure care, cancer/screening, etc, have such recs. Infectious disease management, except for pneumonia, bacterial sepsis, UTI, and some others, has few.
"Somehow, the brain of medicine at large has been damaged, and we all think 1A level data is meant to be used as a threshold to adopt a practice at all. And the notion that a pandemic should not impact this? Pure unprecedented idiocy." -Eric Osgood MD, 01/15/2021
@Lisa Mueller Kory mentioned being on Dr. Campbell.
👍 👍
"Joe Rogan podcast..." You just lost all credibility.
@Dino Do all Rogan guests lose credibility by definition?
I'm waiting for it to be widely recommended. Sounds like it should be.
PHARMA bias is a huge impediment, killing millions😠
Ivermectin is banned because it is said to be unsafe.
Ivermectin has received 2684 reports of side effects in 40 years of use.
Ivermectin has received 67 reports per year.
Ivermectin has been found to be unsafe!
AstraZeneca has 292,283 side effects reported in 1 year.
AstraZeneca has been found to be safe.
Pfeizer has 238,435 reports of side effects in 1 year.
Pfeizer has been found safe.
Moderna has 49,323 reports of side effects in 1 year.
Moderna has been found safe.
Janssen has 11,276 reports of side effects in 6 months.
Janssen has been found safe
(I can't report more about the other brands because access to the eudravigilance site suddenly won't load.)
This is criminal behavior.
Crimes against man.
It is genocide on a global scale!
Welcome to global governance.
Ivermectin won’t be recommended- it is too cheap safe and effective. There is little money to be made and tons would be lost by vaccine companies. Please order your own ivermectin in case you or your family need it. Available online from IndiaMart.com
@@sachabarlow9483 can I order from the U.S ?
Mexico City, Belize, dozens of countries using it. Not UK. It saves lives for God sake.
Thank you for your service, knowledge and articulating abilities. 👍
It has been released for use in Florida, USA, Slovenia, Belgian and Mexico!!
I have been on ivermectin for 4 months now. No side effects, still healthy. As far as I’m concerned it works. Prescription is $10 a month .
Good luck peeps 🍀
How do you get it 🙏?
Fantastic Blake thanks for sharing best wishes from Glasgow scotland
@@whitebalance6498 I showed my doctor the info on ivermectin and after looking at RUclips links and a little research on his own he said “ well, it can’t hurt you” so I did.
@@blakestephens9362 It can't hurt you, it's been around for decades and something like 6 billion doses have been administered, the notion it's suddenly unsafe is ridiculous.
@@rodpanhard You talk about it as if it was like eating celery. Ivermectin was never intended for long term use, nor high doses. It can be harmful like any other medication. Everything needs a cult these days.
Somehow Im not surprised that WHO objects invermectin.
They have subzero credibility anyway.
At least they don’t recommend healthy children or pregnant women get the vaccine which we can’t say the same with the CDC. I argue USA is worse
@@sarah29880 they changed their webpage didn’t they?
@@nazarartykula401 which CDC of WHO? I think WHO recently changed with not recommending it for healthy children and pregnant women. Not sure about CDC!
@@nazarartykula401 I have a grudge against the CDC because they deny chronic Lyme exists and their research studies involve like 1 person in each study and it’s from the 90s lol. Also they refuse to listen to any experts on Lyme and treatment. We have ILADS which is a whole other organization because CDC has failed to acknowledge long -term lyme symptoms. My rant 😊
@@sarah29880 So true, they beieve what they want to see only.
Ivermectin is very cheap to make. No pharmacological companies or UK government agency (or University) involved in assessing the efficacy of Ivermectin - WHAT A SURPRISE..
The largest study with the highest benefit (90%) from IVM that was included in this meta-analysis was by Dr. Ahmed Elgazzar from Benha University in Egypt, published on the Research Square website in November. In July of this year, Research Square withdrew that publication, citing "ethical concerns." Outside investigators had evaluated Dr. Elgazzar's study and found multiple episodes of fraud and fabrication of data.
The meta-analysis was repeated without Dr. Elgazzar's data and could not demonstrate any benefit from IVM.
"Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally." - American Journal of Therapeutics (August 2021)
@@mboiko I appreciate your quotation from the American Journal of Therapeutics study (by Andrew Bryant, et.al.), but that study’s methods have been criticized by other medical experts who have therefore questioned its recommendations.
To begin, the principal authors of that study deny conflicts of interest (All medical authors are required to declare any conflicts), but are in fact affiliated with the organization BIRD (British Ivermectin Recommendation Development) that has loudly campaigned for the approval of ivermectin for Covid since last year. This fact does not invalidate any of their data, but makes it unlikely they would ever publish anything opposing ivermectin, and could bias their interpretation of data.
The Bryant study is a meta-analysis, a type of study that does not provide any new data but combines data from multiple other selected studies to develop a single conclusion with greater statistical weight. The trouble with meta-analyses is that the combined data from multiple poorly performed studies does not magically create a high quality conclusion, even if that might seem to be true on paper. “Garbage in, garbage out” is a common criticism of some meta-analyses.
Indeed, the authors admit that some of the studies they use in their meta-analysis are weak, because of lack of peer review, potential bias, small numbers, uncertain endpoints, variable treatment regimens, and other concerns. Three studies that they evaluated were thought superior in terms of “low risk of bias,” according to Bryant, but all three failed to find any benefit from ivermectin.
Bryant et. al. also used the large Egyptian study by Elgazzar in his analysis, that claimed the most impressive clinical benefit (90%) from ivermectin. Subsequent to the publication of their meta-analysis, though, that Egyptian study was withdrawn by its publisher for “ethical concerns” after significant evidence of plagiarism, fraud, and manufactured data. Without the imagined impressive results from that study, the conclusions of the meta-analysis would have been far less impressive.
Since the Bryant study, two other meta-analyses of ivermectin have been published with slightly different inclusion criteria. “Ivermectin for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials,” by Roman, et. al., concluded that “Compared with the standard of care or placebo, IVM did not reduce all-cause mortality, length of stay, or viral clearance,” and that “IVM is not a viable option to treat patients with COVID-19.” Another meta-analysis by the Cochrane Group, considered the gold standard for systematic evaluations of medical evidence, concluded there was “no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID-19 infection.” Specifically, it reported, “The Cochrane review cannot confirm whether ivermectin (administered in hospital or as an outpatient) compared with placebo or usual care, leads to more or fewer deaths after one month, whether it improves or worsens patients’ condition, increases or decreases unwanted side effects, nor whether it increases or reduces negative COVID-19 tests 7 days after treatment. Likewise, the review cannot confirm whether or not ivermectin prevents SARS-CoV-2 infection or reduces number of deaths after high-risk exposure.” Both of these meta-analyses commented on the poor quality of evidence available.
More recently, there have been two more high quality, blinded, placebo controlled studies published. The TOGETHER trial investigating the “Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin 3-day on Risk of Emergency Care and Hospitalization Among Patients with COVID-19” found no effect in a study of over 1,350 patients. “Effect of Ivermectin on Time to Resolution of Symptoms Among Adults With Mild COVID-19,” by Medina, et. al., found no benefit either.
This extended post is to demonstrate that the recommendation of one particular meta-analysis has to be questioned given the potential bias among its authors plus its methodological concerns. The question of ivermectin’s benefit for Covid infections was hampered early on by a bunch of poorly done studies. More recent and better designed investigations have demonstrated ivermectin’s lack of therapeutic benefit.
Been waiting for your input on the ivermectin study. Thank you. Feel better when you give your input.
Like 1 year too late
@@christryst Dr Campbell deals with evidence based information, more of it becoming available now! a year ago it was mostly just rumours.
@@tomnicholson2115 Frontline Doctors were out there, not rumors. A complicit press, Social Media, MSM, political toadies, Big Letter Government Agencies, WHO, and the Globalist Authoritarians all sought to bury these proven safe, longstanding therapies. And, there were other credible clinicians who analyzed their past uses and read prior studies that pointed to an expectation of therapeutic activity AND they had the courage to doctor their patients. Centralized Authorities as they stand now, do not deserve a chorus of apologists. They knew what they were doing. Calculated.
@@tomnicholson2115 that's bullshit and you know it
@@dylanharnettmarshall9700 Prove it! Point out the evidence from one year ago! All the papers and peer reviews ect.
Ivermectin can play a crucial role in future pandemics, too.
In future seasonal flues you mean 😉.
Which is why it must be banned!
You have seen the face of the enemy, do you really believe that future will be allowed to exist....one in which they actually do the right thing?
It is working very fast in blocking the spikes on the receptors! Our immune response too slow! The virus mutates because it gain of functions features are to do that! Is too late! They escaped with your immune system informations. Now has better evasive and more penetrating capabilities! Is like a preprogrammed nano virus robot of invincibility! 😭😭😭😭😭
@@GregMoress lol. e z on the enthusiasm .
If a new cancer drug had this effect, it would cost £400,000 for a years treatment.
What effect? It was debunked.
Let's start using it that's better than the everlasting research going on I have nothing against the on going research but while we're waiting, Why not start Saving Lives. I hope my Country will follow the footsteps of Indonesia when it comes to the Mass production of Ivermectin.
Uh oh, Dr. Campbell, I don’t think Big Pharma is going to like you very much. But I sure do. Thanks for everything you’ve done and everything you are. I’m keeping the faith because of you and a handful of others.
conspiracy. you are down at the level wit hthis illiterate doctor
Far too little far too late from him
ignoring the safety profile of these experimental vaccines he even advocated them for babies
Healthy people do not need testing or treating
c19ivermectin.com
dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/24/crimes-against-humanity-uk-government-release-21st-report-on-adverse-reactions-to-the-covid-vaccines/
@@daverok1113 the AZ is pretty critical, especially for younger people. it has barely no problems age 65+, but i would notrecommend for 45 or younger. never for children.
the Pfizer is maybe acceptable, because 1 in 3000 youth people gets a hard progress so the vaccine would be less bad. but since i had it already no clue why i should take it, maybe in 3 years though. maybe
@@MrTiti That's untrue aboutAZ and the
elderly it as been killing them off too
Do not fall into the trap, none are safe and none are necessary
@@daverok1113 of course Campbell talks some bull that he cannot see. but "killing them off" is like you are living in a phantasy world. of course vaccination is the way to go and they are acceptable, some worse, some good.
Well said Dr john great discussion this treatment of invermectin should be used in all countries what have we said on this channel why are governments so slow to react look at the lives could have been saved looks like there is no money in it a bit like vitimin D best update so far dr john your always ahead of the curve with yourself r data reports best wishes all from Glasgow scotland stay safe everyone
Because they want you to get jabbed, in a live trial of the new vaccine, licensed for emergency use only. To ‘prove’ the drug and to make money. Ivermectin etc ar3 already proven, and very cheap, nothing 5o gain ( except lives saved…)
@@another1498 good point the more treatments the better to end this pandemic
you too William
@@peacefuljourney4994 thanks peaceful for your kind words best to you and your family 👍
Ivermectin 48 mg und Olivenöl 10 ml für 3 Tage, Albendazol 2400 mg und Olivenöl 50 ml für 4 Tage, Quercetin Resveratrol egcg Meformin 1000 ml Berberin Omega 3 Curcumin täglich. Essen Sie 3 Tage lang.. nach dem Abendessen 15 Gramm liposomales Vitamin C, 100 mg Doxycyclin und 500 mg Azithromycin.. Wenn Sie täglich 1 Stunde lang ein heißes Halbbad nehmen, können Sie Krebs heilen. 3.5mg naltrexon 5000iu vitamid jedentag.Der Arzt sagte mir, ich solle mein Leben in einem Monat organisieren. Ich habe das in 6 Monaten gemacht. abgeschlossen. Die Heilungsrate von Krebsmedikamenten beträgt etwa 3%. Wenn es nach 5 Jahren wiederkehrt, sterben alle. Ivermectin Albendazol tötet Krebsstammzellen. kein rezidiv.....in korea gibt es viele menschen, die krebs mit dieser methode heilen. sehr schnell und ohne Nebenwirkungen.....
12-48mg ivermectin 100mg doxycyclin 50mg zinc cure covid 19 for7days(500mg quercetin.5g liposomal vitaminc)
man can take upto 96mg ivermectin a day ..20days straightly. cancer patients in korea took experiments. he took 120mg a day for 20 days straightly to cure the terminal cancer...
vaccines can not prevent delta variants..igg antibodies does not lasts forever.
ivernom from india. it is just 0.3 dollars for 12mg. lots of korean take this. ivernom(ivermectin from india)
48mg ivermectin(1.2dollars) a day cures cancer very well. even double efficacy than keytruda(5000 dollars once) that is the reason why doctors do not use ivermectin. they can get 2000 dollars at once with keytruda......
Doctors are censored in the public sector by regulatory boards and threats of sanctions against their license. Good review! Thanks
"Our meta-analysis of survival for ivermectin had to be retracted after one of the main studies was suspected of medical fraud. With the revised version, there is no statistically significant survival benefit for ivermectin. So the original version should not be quoted." Dr Andrew Hill
You have millions willing to take Ivermectin who’ve read the risks and ALL the countries using an emergency authorized vaccine is saying NO - think about that and try to explain to anyone why those who are willing to take a probiotic aren’t allowed to - we would know with no doubt if governments weren’t running interference and if big pharma actually care to do research instead of leaving it to doctors who rather be helping people during a pandemic instead of having to write papers
I’m in the crowd who loves when you help us wade through studies. Thank you.
This is interesting. Because last year when I went on a lot of discussions and suggested everyone research Ivermectin I was banned from you tube for 3 months.
This pandemic is greatest transfer of wealth in known history. I am a nurse. I have seen hundreds of positive tested people. Only 3 had serious complications. Most had no symptoms except likes as smell loss and similar. All risk patients who went under heart surgery like bypass, stents or heart valves OPs and got positive tested in hospital after that OP
There was an election to win
this entire pandemic, from the very beginning when airports and harbors were not closed, has been about economic growth for investors over human health. Why did bill gates convince Oxford not to give the astra zeneca vaccine for free to poor countries?? why did fauci and the cdc turn down free tests from the WHO and tell us not to wear masks when it broke out in the US? I was on the national first responder team under obama and we had a stockpile of masks in national guard airports.
@@louisehoff Your name doesn't appear as a member of the Obama administration. Can you be more specific about what your job was? Of your other babblings, the only one that hold up to scrutiny is that Fauci more than once said masks weren't necessary. He later said he did that so the public wouldn't buy them all, leaving none for health care workers. He lied to us, and that's inexcusable.
In the rest of the world it cost $.02 to make ivermectin but here in the US it cost 200% more but that us still only $2
Dr Campbell--Please investigate that metalysis futher. There are a number of reliable experts (e.g. Dr Hansen) who have found serious faults with it, after its publication, primarily with some of the "studies" that were analysed.
The idiot in me is prone to ask:
Why would a drug company want to fund any study that would say an inexpensive drug might work better or in lieu of a more expensive one that the tax payers are funding?
Anyone want to provide a list of any elected officials receiving campaign donations from drug companies?
Any of the patients studied have gun shot wounds, signs of physical abuse, or any other odd quirks that just don't make sense but are claimed to be covid related? Asking for a friend.
Last one, let me see, no funding from drug companies, results show it might work, they don't like it because they can't make any money off the back of the general public, and it appears to be honest? Anyone want to wager a guess what would happen if you put a huge pile of money on a table with a sign that reads, "Take only what you need"?
Thank you for posting!