@Brad Watson ⁰knowledge of field is incomplete without that of its witness , observer or knower in context to both micro and macro , part and whole ,one and . many . According to the Bhagavat Geeta ,true knowledge constitutes the right knowlede of both field (khetra) and ( khetranjna) knower of the field in all levels of existence or reality . Their interactioñ is so meaninggul that evolution of life not only is initiated but also consumated in principle through replication and self realization
Thanks prof Brian Green. The sequential analysis is really commendable Like establishing right sequence of our double helix chromosom oneday it may explain simply the genesis of our reality
@@degaussingatmosphericcharg575 no that's not true there are many proofs of God, for eg. If gravitational force was just a bit stronger then matter wouldn't had been formed and if a bit weaker matter wouldn't had been formed. If strong nuclear force would've been a bit weaker atomic nuclei would neved had been formed and there are tons of reasons that this beautiful universe is created by someone. Brian Greene is a genius the above man is literally lame, Brian Greene has found mirror symmetry of string theory, and calabi yau maths, and he is also the reason for my motivation in science, but his belief on god is his choice. Even I am a bit skeptic for God and maybe anthropic principle is the reality but maybe God is there, who knows?
Quantum Entanglement is so spooky that it surely must be a key to unlocking the next layer of Reality. This is an example of the kind of unnatural speculation Brian Greene's genius with analogy often engenders in nurses & brick-layers, actresses & bus-drivers. He is perhaps the greatest theoretical intellect of my generation because he switches others ON.
I used to play his Nova documentary The Elegant Universe to my daughter to help her sleep at night. Happy memories. :) It's a little different from what my mom played for me as a child at night...which was someone reading Bible verses lol. :P
I am reading his book, Fabric of cosmos. Difficult for me to understand, but interesting theme. thanks to these videos my understandment has becoming easiest.
@@oimrqs1691 I would recommend all of his books. Funny story though, I read Fabric in 2010... It was so heavy on my little brain that I kind of had to mix it up with one of the Twilight books. xD "OK, now I've read x pages of BG today, my brain is fried. Time to relax over dinner with Twilight." :B
quite good lecture our understanding of universe is based on the physical laws but the quantum particle does not seems to follow them so how the universe can depend on these laws if the basic building blocks does not follow them.
Is gravitational force actin' upwards 🤔,or both sides?? Stability of balls and the sun. They're not changing directons and movements outside of the pattern but circulating only.what cause they circulation,stability?
Thanks for a great talk. As to the man questioning the veracity of language in describing modern physics: language is a system. All systems are finite by definition. That means that there will be things outside its 'wheelhouse'. I doubt you could describe your favorite painting well enough for me to picture it in my mind anything like you see it. Oh, I might get a feel for colors, composition, & such, and I might even catch some glimpse of what it means to you. But I'd really have to see it for myself; something you'd almost certainly be quick to tell me. But science communicators - especially those who are actually practicing scientists - have not only words, but pictures, as well as math at their own disposal. Plus the fact that as scientists, they've 'seen it for themselves'. They do their best to share all that with us, but it's not easy! There is some truth in saying that areas of modern science - particularly particle physics and cosmology - have become increasingly abstract, and that makes a science communicator's job all the harder. There's also the jargon barrier. All organized institutions have at least a bit of their own language; terms that only apply to their specialty. Parsec is good example from cosmology. The light year that we're familiar with is not something cosmologists often use among themselves. They use the parsec. They also all use metrics; even here in North America (except when NASA forgets!) So there are plenty of challenges to keep an honest science communicator busy! Thanks again. tavi.
it occurs to me that the vast majority of science lectures deal mostly the with history of the great men, and, sadly to a much lesser extent , the great women who "invented" and toiled in the development of all the great ideas we hear about today, A hundred years from now, what stories will lecturers be telling about this epoch? Who will be the characters alive and working today that will be the protagonists populating the great science stories told to enthralled audiences the world over?
From Job 38 (The Message Translation) ... Where were you when I created the earth? Tell me, since you know so much! Who decided on its size? Certainly you’ll know that! Who came up with the blueprints and measurements? How was its foundation poured, and who set the cornerstone, While the morning stars sang in chorus and all the angels shouted praise? And who took charge of the ocean when it gushed forth like a baby from the womb? That was me! I wrapped it in soft clouds, and tucked it in safely at night. Then I made a playpen for it, a strong playpen so it couldn’t run loose, And said, ‘Stay here, this is your place. Your wild tantrums are confined to this place.’ 12-15 “And have you ever ordered Morning, ‘Get up!’ told Dawn, ‘Get to work!’ So you could seize Earth like a blanket and shake out the wicked like cockroaches? As the sun brings everything to light, brings out all the colors and shapes, The cover of darkness is snatched from the wicked- they’re caught in the very act! 16-18 “Have you ever gotten to the true bottom of things, explored the labyrinthine caves of deep ocean? Do you know the first thing about death? Do you have one clue regarding death’s dark mysteries? And do you have any idea how large this earth is? Speak up if you have even the beginning of an answer. 19-21 “Do you know where Light comes from and where Darkness lives So you can take them by the hand and lead them home when they get lost? Why, of course you know that. You’ve known them all your life, grown up in the same neighborhood with them! 22-30 “Have you ever traveled to where snow is made, seen the vault where hail is stockpiled, The arsenals of hail and snow that I keep in readiness for times of trouble and battle and war? Can you find your way to where lightning is launched, or to the place from which the wind blows? Who do you suppose carves canyons for the downpours of rain, and charts the route of thunderstorms That bring water to unvisited fields, deserts no one ever lays eyes on, Drenching the useless wastelands so they’re carpeted with wildflowers and grass? And who do you think is the father of rain and dew, the mother of ice and frost? You don’t for a minute imagine these marvels of weather just happen, do you? 31-33 “Can you catch the eye of the beautiful Pleiades sisters, or distract Orion from his hunt? Can you get Venus to look your way, or get the Great Bear and her cubs to come out and play? Do you know the first thing about the sky’s constellations and how they affect things on Earth? 34-35 “Can you get the attention of the clouds, and commission a shower of rain? Can you take charge of the lightning bolts and have them report to you for orders? What Do You Have to Say for Yourself? 36-38 “Who do you think gave weather-wisdom to the ibis, and storm-savvy to the rooster? Does anyone know enough to number all the clouds or tip over the rain barrels of heaven When the earth is cracked and dry, the ground baked hard as a brick? 39-41 “Can you teach the lioness to stalk her prey and satisfy the appetite of her cubs As they crouch in their den, waiting hungrily in their cave? And who sets out food for the ravens when their young cry to God, fluttering about because they have no food?”
Some Scientists have calculated the tensile strength of a single String in respect to String Theory. If you ask that particular Man who have done these calculations to explain how he Imagines Space, Time and Gravitational Effect, because that's what it's all about, I believe you will get a rather unexpected answer, but probably the most close one to the Reality of the Cosmos.
Negative charge particle is goes into the black hole. And positive will get rid of it by using its energy . In t he form of hawking radiation. And that negative partner is responsible for perishment of black hole. With its negative energy.
Negative partner is goes into the black hole. And positive one is get rid of it in the form of hawking radiation. But negative partner is responsible for perishment of black hole.
Any particular energy, particle or otherwise is stripped of it's information . Regarding quantum entanglement, it is believed through the containment of information that the particle is always present in the black hole including it's entangled particle should it be within the Schwarzchild Radius, or Beyond the Event Horizon. Since no energy is known to escape any black holes in our known universe, it is forever encapsulated within the black hole. Moreover, in theory, entangled particles will release energy in the form of Hawking Radiation. Note that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. This is important because it implies that in some form energy absorbed by a black hole should in theory be released. Quantum Physics is more Grey then Black or White. There is more we don't know in the quantum world then anything else. Essential Particles, Quarks and Neutrinos in theory and in experiments violate the Laws of Physics.
God sake. You're an amazing speaker Brian and dont you look so young. Lol. Father time will catch eventually. You still look good for a 50 odd year old. Cheers for the talk.
I'm skeptical about his scenario in which 2 people have different times on their watches because they have traveled at different rates. Traveling is only done relative to other objects. If someone travels at the speed of light relative to someone else, the person he is traveling at the speed of light relative to is traveling at the speed of light relative to him. Wouldn't their perception of time be identical?
*_"theory piled on theory piled on theory."_* The String Hypothesis is not actually a scientific theory. It cannot be tested, verified or falsified. It's theoretical idea piled on theoretical idea piled on theoretical idea, with a lot of complex mathematics. {:o:O:}
Every science fact we know of now , was at first posthulated as a theory. String theory is possibly correct because there is a lot of mathematics posthulating its credability .
Orbiting planets are comparable to a marble orbiting a bowling ball in the centre of a stretched trampoline .The planets and marble follow the stretched fabric , except the planets are following stretched Spacetime (as opposed to a trampoline).Therefore , the orbits will always be circular , not rectangular.
I read somewhere recently that string theory is falling out of favor. It is no longer as popular as it once was because it has proven nothing. Only brought about a lot of what if's.
if we play with nuclear ENERGY,,wouldn't that screw with the fabric of space .. and possibly poke holes in that fabric and tear what we know as our world,,and blow us apart??
This is explained by Einstein's theory of GR. Gravity does not pull like Newton thought. Rather, the mass of the sun and all objects in space "warps" the space-time "fabric" such that smaller mass objects move around the larger objects. They technically move around the center of mass which is concentrated at the Sun but the sun does kind of wobble due to the other planets' presence. Space pushes mass. Think of it that way instead. So space is pushing on us. That's why we are stuck on Earth's surface. In fact, gravity may not be a force after all. It may be an emergent property of space itself when mass is "warping" it. Also, it may be that gravity is just an illusion. This is a pretty wild speculation but it's a byproduct of black hole physics and what happens to information around the event horizon. If you want more information, look up the holographic principle.
Planets are moving because they are made of stardust that was already moving before they formed the planets themselves. Gravity helped to give them form by accretion. As there was nothing to stop them, they kept moving so far, but not in straight line across the space. The same gravity that gave them shape, keeps the planets moving around the stars. Yes, gravity only pulls, but it doesn't eliminates the initial force given to the planets, otherwise, they all would fall on their own stars of their solar systems. Two forces imbalances each other producing a circular effect.
King Nimrod all over again. . . We have had the proverbial "why" for over 4000 years. You really should read a little more. . . With that said, Merry Chrℹ️stmas & Happy New Year❕ 😁
I was all in agreement I t you started talking about the Big Bang theory. It amazes me how some people can be so smart but lacks wisdom about Jesus Christ. My prayer is that you would see how God is all in creation and the science. God bless.
Just because there's commonalities in bone structures among different animals does not mean they evolved from each other or our ancestors of each other. That's completely ridiculous to say that one species is an ancestor of another species. Source innitiated the universe and all life to coexist in harmony and provide plentifully for everyone. We come from Source Elohim.
Brian Greene always reminds me how much I love (and suffer from the lack of) intelligent people!
I love watching Brian's hands while he talks! 😂
How does this not even have 100k veiws. Such a great and well layed out presentation
Today , it has 148 ,000 views.
starts at 6:45
Thanks man
Wow... what a engaging lecture it is! . Great physicst of the era. DR. BRIAN GREENE ✌✌👍👍
@Brad Watson ⁰knowledge of field is incomplete without that of its witness , observer or knower in context to both micro and macro , part and whole ,one and . many . According to the Bhagavat Geeta ,true knowledge constitutes the right knowlede of both field (khetra) and ( khetranjna) knower of the field in all levels of existence or reality . Their interactioñ is so meaninggul that evolution of life not only is initiated but also consumated in principle through replication and self realization
Thanks prof Brian Green. The sequential analysis is really commendable
Like establishing right sequence of our double helix chromosom oneday it may explain simply the genesis of our reality
Brian Green is a Saint
Isn't he a wonderful explainer of it all, big fan of Green!
A brilliant speaker
A man whom I could listen for whole life.
Who you may listen to. 🧐
@@levigoldwing1536 p
Agreed
@@degaussingatmosphericcharg575 no that's not true there are many proofs of God, for eg. If gravitational force was just a bit stronger then matter wouldn't had been formed and if a bit weaker matter wouldn't had been formed. If strong nuclear force would've been a bit weaker atomic nuclei would neved had been formed and there are tons of reasons that this beautiful universe is created by someone. Brian Greene is a genius the above man is literally lame, Brian Greene has found mirror symmetry of string theory, and calabi yau maths, and he is also the reason for my motivation in science, but his belief on god is his choice. Even I am a bit skeptic for God and maybe anthropic principle is the reality but maybe God is there, who knows?
@@hououinkyoumaich NO, you did not state any jproof for any gods existence, only opinions.
The clarity and power of simplification of this man are amazing.
What a beautiful presentation. I admire Prof. Greene. Thank you sir.
Nearly 20 years ago and still state of the art
Brian Greene is an excellent story teller.
Skip to 06:56.
Quantum Entanglement is so spooky that it surely must be a key to unlocking the next layer of Reality.
This is an example of the kind of unnatural speculation Brian Greene's genius with analogy often engenders in nurses & brick-layers, actresses & bus-drivers. He is perhaps the greatest theoretical intellect of my generation because he switches others ON.
I play this at night while kids sleep because THEY are the ones who will take it further.
I used to play his Nova documentary The Elegant Universe to my daughter to help her sleep at night. Happy memories. :) It's a little different from what my mom played for me as a child at night...which was someone reading Bible verses lol. :P
What causes the string to vibrate. And what would happen if it stopped vibrating??
What a great physicist is Sir Brian Greene ..
I am reading his book, Fabric of cosmos. Difficult for me to understand, but interesting theme. thanks to these videos my understandment has becoming easiest.
Would you recommend it? Never read it!
@@oimrqs1691 I would recommend all of his books. Funny story though, I read Fabric in 2010... It was so heavy on my little brain that I kind of had to mix it up with one of the Twilight books. xD "OK, now I've read x pages of BG today, my brain is fried. Time to relax over dinner with Twilight." :B
Proud to be from Oregon!Great talk as always Dr Greene, thank you to all.
amazing lecture
quite good lecture
our understanding of universe is based on the physical laws but the quantum particle does not seems to follow them so how the universe can depend on these laws if the basic building blocks does not follow them.
Is gravitational force actin' upwards 🤔,or both sides??
Stability of balls and the sun. They're not changing directons and movements outside of the pattern but circulating only.what cause they circulation,stability?
Thanks for a great talk. As to the man questioning the veracity of language in describing modern physics: language is a system. All systems are finite by definition. That means that there will be things outside its 'wheelhouse'. I doubt you could describe your favorite painting well enough for me to picture it in my mind anything like you see it. Oh, I might get a feel for colors, composition, & such, and I might even catch some glimpse of what it means to you. But I'd really have to see it for myself; something you'd almost certainly be quick to tell me. But science communicators - especially those who are actually practicing scientists - have not only words, but pictures, as well as math at their own disposal. Plus the fact that as scientists, they've 'seen it for themselves'. They do their best to share all that with us, but it's not easy! There is some truth in saying that areas of modern science - particularly particle physics and cosmology - have become increasingly abstract, and that makes a science communicator's job all the harder. There's also the jargon barrier. All organized institutions have at least a bit of their own language; terms that only apply to their specialty. Parsec is good example from cosmology. The light year that we're familiar with is not something cosmologists often use among themselves. They use the parsec. They also all use metrics; even here in North America (except when NASA forgets!) So there are plenty of challenges to keep an honest science communicator busy! Thanks again. tavi.
ç ç
i. çü.
i. i. ç.
üç. ü. i. i.
ü ü
i
ç.
ç ü.
ü. ü. i
ç. i.
i.
iü
i. ü. ç. i. ₺.
ç. i
ü. Çü
i
i.
ü. ç i ç. ç
ç. ç. i. ü. ü. ç. ç.
i.
😮.
ş ç ü . ç.
i. ü ç ü ç
,
ü ş
ü
i. i.
i ,
i.
it occurs to me that the vast majority of science lectures deal mostly the with history of the great men, and, sadly to a much lesser extent , the great women who "invented" and toiled in the development of all the great ideas we hear about today, A hundred years from now, what stories will lecturers be telling about this epoch? Who will be the characters alive and working today that will be the protagonists populating the great science stories told to enthralled audiences the world over?
Agreed 👍. They missing a certain key points. And don't give space for women sciencetists to come forth.
Nothing would be said at all🙄
The numbers are nothing more than the stimulation running perfectly!
Poor etiquette by the crowd who left before Q&A.
From Job 38 (The Message Translation)
...
Where were you when I created the earth?
Tell me, since you know so much!
Who decided on its size? Certainly you’ll know that!
Who came up with the blueprints and measurements?
How was its foundation poured,
and who set the cornerstone,
While the morning stars sang in chorus
and all the angels shouted praise?
And who took charge of the ocean
when it gushed forth like a baby from the womb?
That was me! I wrapped it in soft clouds,
and tucked it in safely at night.
Then I made a playpen for it,
a strong playpen so it couldn’t run loose,
And said, ‘Stay here, this is your place.
Your wild tantrums are confined to this place.’
12-15 “And have you ever ordered Morning, ‘Get up!’
told Dawn, ‘Get to work!’
So you could seize Earth like a blanket
and shake out the wicked like cockroaches?
As the sun brings everything to light,
brings out all the colors and shapes,
The cover of darkness is snatched from the wicked-
they’re caught in the very act!
16-18 “Have you ever gotten to the true bottom of things,
explored the labyrinthine caves of deep ocean?
Do you know the first thing about death?
Do you have one clue regarding death’s dark mysteries?
And do you have any idea how large this earth is?
Speak up if you have even the beginning of an answer.
19-21 “Do you know where Light comes from
and where Darkness lives
So you can take them by the hand
and lead them home when they get lost?
Why, of course you know that.
You’ve known them all your life,
grown up in the same neighborhood with them!
22-30 “Have you ever traveled to where snow is made,
seen the vault where hail is stockpiled,
The arsenals of hail and snow that I keep in readiness
for times of trouble and battle and war?
Can you find your way to where lightning is launched,
or to the place from which the wind blows?
Who do you suppose carves canyons
for the downpours of rain, and charts
the route of thunderstorms
That bring water to unvisited fields,
deserts no one ever lays eyes on,
Drenching the useless wastelands
so they’re carpeted with wildflowers and grass?
And who do you think is the father of rain and dew,
the mother of ice and frost?
You don’t for a minute imagine
these marvels of weather just happen, do you?
31-33 “Can you catch the eye of the beautiful Pleiades sisters,
or distract Orion from his hunt?
Can you get Venus to look your way,
or get the Great Bear and her cubs to come out and play?
Do you know the first thing about the sky’s constellations
and how they affect things on Earth?
34-35 “Can you get the attention of the clouds,
and commission a shower of rain?
Can you take charge of the lightning bolts
and have them report to you for orders?
What Do You Have to Say for Yourself?
36-38 “Who do you think gave weather-wisdom to the ibis,
and storm-savvy to the rooster?
Does anyone know enough to number all the clouds
or tip over the rain barrels of heaven
When the earth is cracked and dry,
the ground baked hard as a brick?
39-41 “Can you teach the lioness to stalk her prey
and satisfy the appetite of her cubs
As they crouch in their den,
waiting hungrily in their cave?
And who sets out food for the ravens
when their young cry to God,
fluttering about because they have no food?”
Some Scientists have calculated the tensile strength of a single String in respect to String Theory. If you ask that particular Man who have done these calculations to explain how he Imagines Space, Time and Gravitational Effect, because that's what it's all about, I believe you will get a rather unexpected answer, but probably the most close one to the Reality of the Cosmos.
What would happen to an entangled particle if the particle that it was entangled with went into a black hole?
Negative charge particle is goes into the black hole. And positive will get rid of it by using its energy . In t he form of hawking radiation. And that negative partner is responsible for perishment of black hole. With its negative energy.
Negative partner is goes into the black hole. And positive one is get rid of it in the form of hawking radiation. But negative partner is responsible for perishment of black hole.
Any particular energy, particle or otherwise is stripped of it's information . Regarding quantum entanglement, it is believed through the containment of information that the particle is always present in the black hole including it's entangled particle should it be within the Schwarzchild Radius, or Beyond the Event Horizon. Since no energy is known to escape any black holes in our known universe, it is forever encapsulated within the black hole. Moreover, in theory, entangled particles will release energy in the form of Hawking Radiation. Note that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. This is important because it implies that in some form energy absorbed by a black hole should in theory be released. Quantum Physics is more Grey then Black or White. There is more we don't know in the quantum world then anything else. Essential Particles, Quarks and Neutrinos in theory and in experiments violate the Laws of Physics.
Brian You are genius man !
God sake. You're an amazing speaker Brian and dont you look so young. Lol. Father time will catch eventually. You still look good for a 50 odd year old. Cheers for the talk.
That's not Father Time.It's sun exposure.
Why are all the best videos on You Tube nearly 20 years old? :(
{:o:O:}
I'm skeptical about his scenario in which 2 people have different times on their watches because they have traveled at different rates. Traveling is only done relative to other objects. If someone travels at the speed of light relative to someone else, the person he is traveling at the speed of light relative to is traveling at the speed of light relative to him. Wouldn't their perception of time be identical?
They do have different times. Look up "time dilation"
Also, time is affected by gravity. It's different on earth compared to satellites in space.
Their distance/speed is measured relative to their shared starting point.
At 57:00 Brian amplifies the "antnalogy." :)
Genius!!
Dr. Greene can you do something more useful. Perhaps, reading to the elderly but not your books. Something they might enjoy. I kid of course. Big Fan!
:) Good one!! But finally you got the Nobel Prize!
Give that last kid a harvard scholarship.
String Theory? Oh, I know. The Cats Cradle.
The last question is the best ahaha :D
Brian Green what a legend
00:06:53
To bypass the TWO Interminable Introductions of Tedium!
{:o:O:}
For else we wouldn’t be here
Therefore as per perturbation theory the universe shouldn't even exist?
Book promotion ?
😀👍
An excellent lecture but it seems so much like theory piled on theory piled on theory. I have no idea how much weight to give to these ideas
String theory seems to have hit a dead end since this lecture.
*_"theory piled on theory piled on theory."_*
The String Hypothesis is not actually a scientific theory. It cannot be tested, verified or falsified. It's theoretical idea piled on theoretical idea piled on theoretical idea, with a lot of complex mathematics.
{:o:O:}
Brian Green's face looks photoshopped into someone's body in the thumbnail
Are you a brother of Rhea chakroborty
@@adityajha9665 Yes. Don't tell anyone.
@@adityajha9665 😂
enjoyable and interesting but still a theory ?
7:00
Science aways amazed me, religion, on the other hand, drove me depressed and manipulated by narcissists. Science omnia vincit.
Truth is we just don't know what reality is made of. We come up with theory after theory and they try to pass them off as fact.
You’re one of those God type aren’t you
Every science fact we know of now , was at first posthulated as a theory. String theory is possibly correct because there is a lot of mathematics posthulating its credability .
Can’t we make planets move in rectangular path around sun?
Orbiting planets are comparable to a marble orbiting a bowling ball in the centre of a stretched trampoline .The planets and marble follow the stretched fabric , except the planets are following stretched Spacetime (as opposed to a trampoline).Therefore , the orbits will always be circular , not rectangular.
I read somewhere recently that string theory is falling out of favor. It is no longer as popular as it once was because it has proven nothing. Only brought about a lot of what if's.
Hmm
Lot of turtles there.
Turtles ? They are Happy together, so happy togeeeetheeeerr papa pa paaaa ...
if we play with nuclear ENERGY,,wouldn't that screw with the fabric of space .. and possibly poke holes in that fabric and tear what we know as our world,,and blow us apart??
What keeps planets moving?Gravity only pulls.
This is explained by Einstein's theory of GR. Gravity does not pull like Newton thought. Rather, the mass of the sun and all objects in space "warps" the space-time "fabric" such that smaller mass objects move around the larger objects. They technically move around the center of mass which is concentrated at the Sun but the sun does kind of wobble due to the other planets' presence. Space pushes mass. Think of it that way instead. So space is pushing on us. That's why we are stuck on Earth's surface. In fact, gravity may not be a force after all. It may be an emergent property of space itself when mass is "warping" it. Also, it may be that gravity is just an illusion. This is a pretty wild speculation but it's a byproduct of black hole physics and what happens to information around the event horizon. If you want more information, look up the holographic principle.
Planets are moving because they are made of stardust that was already moving before they formed the planets themselves. Gravity helped to give them form by accretion. As there was nothing to stop them, they kept moving so far, but not in straight line across the space. The same gravity that gave them shape, keeps the planets moving around the stars. Yes, gravity only pulls, but it doesn't eliminates the initial force given to the planets, otherwise, they all would fall on their own stars of their solar systems. Two forces imbalances each other producing a circular effect.
King Nimrod all over again. . . We have had the proverbial "why" for over 4000 years. You really should read a little more. . .
With that said, Merry Chrℹ️stmas & Happy New Year❕
😁
I was all in agreement I t you started talking about the Big Bang theory. It amazes me how some people can be so smart but lacks wisdom about Jesus Christ. My prayer is that you would see how God is all in creation and the science. God bless.
windbags
Just because there's commonalities in bone structures among different animals does not mean they evolved from each other or our ancestors of each other. That's completely ridiculous to say that one species is an ancestor of another species.
Source innitiated the universe and all life to coexist in harmony and provide plentifully for everyone.
We come from Source Elohim.
Why bring that shit here?
You are wrong, biological evolution is a fact which has been observed. Educate yourself; look into biology. Elohim is fake.
made a swallowing mess
Wish he would leave out the politics
He sounds " pissed up" had he had a few drinks??
You fooooool
Definitely inebreated.