Recording Drums - Glyn Johns Technique vs Modern Approach

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 27

  • @telsonalves8060
    @telsonalves8060 20 дней назад +1

    Ficou sensacional essa configuração ! Um dos melhores sons que já ouvi de uma captação de bateria !!!!
    Parabéns !!
    Poderia por favor dizer qual o modelo dessa caixa ( Snare Drum ) ?
    Obrigado. Saúde e sucesso para você.

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  18 дней назад

      Thank you!!! The snare drum is a Tama Swingstar 6.5x14 seamless steel shell made in Japan in 1984. :)

  • @themaddrummerofficial
    @themaddrummerofficial 24 дня назад +2

    As everyone else has stated, both sound phenomenal. However I "personally" really like that GT Technique. It just draws me in a bit more. The modern is great, but I find myself tuning out a little faster (likely because it's a more common sound). Great upload.

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  22 дня назад +1

      Thank you, Steve!! The Glyn Johns technique adds a ton of vibe to the track whereas the modern approach is, as you stated, a bit more common. As a drummer I lean towards the sound of the Glyn Johns technique. :)

  • @blemtaters
    @blemtaters 24 дня назад +1

    The GJ method suits the rest of the mix and the style better but the modern approach is perfectly serviceable and high quality.

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  22 дня назад

      Thank you! I definitely like how lively the Glyn Johns mic setup sounds for this track. :)

  • @chefmike8888
    @chefmike8888 24 дня назад +2

    huge difference between Glyn Johns 4 and the 7. the 4 is why when I was learning many moons ago. We had to try things like slow down the record to try and distinguish between bass and bass drum. Granted, I wound up with a nice bass foot due to choosing incorrectly.
    Even with the 7 mic setup It's much easier to hear each drums tone and attack. Johns god bless him was actually more than most needed then. But it was muddy at times.
    The generation who grew up having videos to actually see what is being played is a double edge sword. They do learn more efficiently, BUT they don't have the same live local music scene that even the 80's had.
    That was my RUclips, playing with other musicians and doing the showcase Saturdays where I got to see how other drummers did it. Maybe because I'm an old curmudgeon I think the way we had it was much more enjoyable. Any given night I could go find 4 or 5 different options to jam with.
    Great channel. Keep 'em coming

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  22 дня назад +1

      Thank you for checking out the video and for your comment! The live music scene has definitely taken a hit. Wish there were more original bands in my area. I know that Nashville still has a great live scene. I've considered relocating several times. :)

  • @Nate-n8s
    @Nate-n8s 23 дня назад +1

    Love it, sounds great. They both sound pro but I am surprised to actually prefer the 4 mic version out of those two. it sounds like its got more dynamic and more stereo. its more exciting to listen to. I guess this contradict my untested theory that more mics are better. At 2nd listen The Kick and Toms have better tone with the 7 mic system while the cymbals sound way more exciting with the 4, the cymbal seem to move around in a really cool way in the first recording. : ) you could probably come up with something that gets the best of both worlds. perhaps get a DRDK7 mic kit to get that polished sound out of your toms than mic the cymbals however you did in the first recording.

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  22 дня назад

      Thanks, Nate!! I'm going to give blending the two microphone setups and see what I come up with! :)

  • @geoffcowan2384
    @geoffcowan2384 25 дней назад +1

    Great player, great kit, perfectly tuned. Mic technique really doesn't matter much. They sounded different, but both sounded great. More than anything it is about the performance and the song. Thanks for the video!

  • @oldguysplaymetal5517
    @oldguysplaymetal5517 25 дней назад +2

    Compromise is what these methods are about. GJ gives more room sound but less discrete tom attack. The modern/close mic sound is more articulate, but then, when used, there is more opportunity for phase or polarity incongruence. With the modern/ close mic technique, we drummers still deem the room mics as "indispensable," LOL.

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  22 дня назад

      Indeed. They both have their challenges and both have something that I like.
      The funny thing about room mics is I rarely use them because the size of the room is so small. :)

    • @oldguysplaymetal5517
      @oldguysplaymetal5517 22 дня назад

      @@RecordingDrumsWithBrad I had that problem with my small room as well, so I started bringing the room mic /s out into the living room, and leaving the door open. Voila'

  • @ccdrums1290
    @ccdrums1290 25 дней назад +2

    They both sound great. However, I prefer the more modern technique as I think it provided more presence in the overall sound. Kick drum was much more prevalent and sounded great, filling the track up on the low end. I think the Glyn Johns technique is cool and useful in some applications, but to me, the more modern sound is “your” sound 😁

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  23 дня назад

      Thanks, Clint! That's one of the things that I like about the modern approach, the low end. :)

  • @rocketsauce5067
    @rocketsauce5067 25 дней назад +2

    The Glen Johns technique sounded more like live in the room and the modern sounded more defined and punchy. I personally liked the modern technique but I do like the Glen Johns for certain things like jazz.

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  22 дня назад

      I can definitely see the Glyn Johns technique being perfect for recording jazz. :)

  • @jacobliford
    @jacobliford 25 дней назад +1

    They honestly both sound great.

  • @mattvdh
    @mattvdh 24 дня назад +1

    The first one had a bit more life and loudness but the 2nd sounded more HD and compressed. I think a mix of the two is needed for the next demo.

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  22 дня назад

      Love the idea of mixing the two techniques! I'll work on that and post the results. Thank you! :)

  • @geoffcowan2384
    @geoffcowan2384 22 дня назад +1

    You know what might be interesting? A modern Metal track recorded with the Glyn Johns technique plus all the guitars/amps from the ‘60s/‘70s era and micing techniques of the time. No samples, no triggers, no IRs. Might be a muddy mess, but then again it might sound cool. Idk?

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  19 дней назад +1

      Love the idea, Geoff! I'll see if I can put a track together and see how it sounds! :)

  • @FPDad15
    @FPDad15 25 дней назад +1

    This comparison brings to the forefront the issue I have had in the past utilizing the GJ method, and that is..... I really dig the sound, but I can't control the crash cymbals from just taking over the mix.

    • @RecordingDrumsWithBrad
      @RecordingDrumsWithBrad  22 дня назад

      Yep, that's one of the issues I have with the technique as well. It doesn't help that I have some of the loudest crash cymbals ever produced. Haha!!