That's a treat John. It shows very nice in and out. Those seats look perfect. Seeing as it's modified, and nicely done at that, I'd go for a Vintage Air swap and remove that under dash unit. That car will be a hit everywhere it goes. Cheers 🇨🇦
Be still my heart!@ I love these Studebakers! Very European design.Very interesting conversion from 4-door to 2-door version and looks like it could have very well have come that way from the factory.
You're not the first one to comment on that. Being a one man show, It's many times awkward trying to open a hood and still hold the camera. I'll make a better effort going forward.
That's not a 62 based on the headlights I had a 62 that's either a 63 or 64 based on the headlights I had no hood ornament on my hood not a 62 I'd like to see the vehicle ID number on it because they didn't look like that in 6263 and 64 they did and the fact that he's shortened it for whatever god-awful reason is beyond me but that's not a 62
That's a treat John. It shows very nice in and out. Those seats look perfect.
Seeing as it's modified, and nicely done at that, I'd go for a Vintage Air swap and remove that under dash unit.
That car will be a hit everywhere it goes.
Cheers 🇨🇦
Be still my heart!@ I love these Studebakers! Very European design.Very interesting conversion from 4-door to 2-door version and looks like it could have very well have come that way from the factory.
Beautiful. Im an orphan car collector and love love this. I would have to sell one of my current cars to buy this. Great car.
John does swaps but this car is on consignment so maybe not.
Beautiful
So cool!
How u gonna show a car and not pop the hood?
You're not the first one to comment on that. Being a one man show, It's many times awkward trying to open a hood and still hold the camera. I'll make a better effort going forward.
Absolutely gorgeous.
Kinda' has a 60s Mercedes SL vibe to it...
Funny you say that because in the 60's, many Studebaker dealers were also Mercedes dealers.
The chrome taillight surrounds are also 1964
Designed as the Starliner for 1953 by Raymond Loeway . Redone by Brook Stephens as the GT Hawk .
Memphis Dan LeLoLai ♥️
Raymond Loewy
That's not a 62 based on the headlights I had a 62 that's either a 63 or 64 based on the headlights I had no hood ornament on my hood not a 62 I'd like to see the vehicle ID number on it because they didn't look like that in 6263 and 64 they did and the fact that he's shortened it for whatever god-awful reason is beyond me but that's not a 62
LOTS of things were done to this car during the shortening. Lots of other year Hawk parts interchanged. By the VIN and title, it started out as a 62.
Right. Pop the hood suck suck.
I think that's a different channel to subscribe to......
5 STARS