If speed cameras are about safety then take the money element out of it. If you just give points instead, then people who don’t learn will lose their license. When money comes into the equation, that always looks like the main reason rather than safety.
It's no secret that motorcycles are awesome. They practically have the lowest emissions, fun, good for commuting, therapy, cheap to run and maintain, great for the environment and ease of traffic, among other benefits. However, the greedy British government and policy makers has double standards. On one hand they say they care about the environment, ulez scams, congestion scams, encouraging cyclists, making special provisions for them, and on the other hand, discouraging and over taxing low to zero emissions motorcycles. For example. I own a 2016 hyundai i10 with a yearly tax of £20 for approximately a 998cc car, with around 109 carbon emissions. But, for 125cc motorcycles the yearly tax is the same £20 with virtually zero emissions. Please note the fact that this is a low cc motorcycle too. And as the cc increases in motorcycles like 300, 600, 1000, the yearly tax increases on them too. So the fact is that, cars are taxed on emissions and motorcycles differently on horsepower, just to justify taxation on them. How is this not greed and discrimination against motorcycles? No one in power really cares about the environment. Its all a big fat cash cow. Have a nice day and ride safe.
They are nothing to do with safety. When a group of local residents asked for a speed check or van to be put on a road that had people doing 45+ in a 30 past an OAP home and school, they were told by the head of the Speed Camera Partnership in the North West that the vans are expensive to deploy. A full survey is required first to capture data of which times most people speed between, to make it cost effective. So if most were thought to be speeding between 8-9am and 9-10pm, they would put the van out only if they could get back enough in fines to make a profit. Now we have 20mph limits, which have no Traffic Orders and are not enforced in most areas legally, the risk to road users has increased. Most accidents on 30mph roads are at or below 20mph and have been for years. The reason for 20 limits was to cause congestion by restricting the flow of traffic in order to suggest there was suddenly more cars on the road or congestion - leading to further taxes.
Yep it’s not bad enough we pay for the cameras, the people watching the cams, the roads to be closed when they are put up and to keep them safe to travel on. After the tax payers pay all of that then they pay fines from everything we have already paid for. By a police force we also pay for… we also pay for the sports cars they drive to catch’s us and there road tax and insurance and maintenance. The working tax payers pays for the whole f’up system.
If avoiding potholes was an olympic sport then the UK would win gold. everyday on my way to work avoiding them has become game, there is always a new one to find.
I recall decades ago on a Heavy Vehicle driving test ( to obtain a MILITARY Heavy Vehicle drivers License ) I hit a somewhat large pot-hole The Instructor said: You did well to avoid the small potholes but you managed hit a big one. To which I replied : It wasn't there yesterday -- it must have been a new one I did not know about. Anyway - a MILITARY driving test is far more intensive and critical than a civilian driving test.
Are you sure it was the LAST time -- When you are pulled over again - you will realize that it was NOT the last time. Do you even know what the word LAST means in the English language ? Do you know the difference between LAST and Previous. Do you know what the LAST day of your life will mean ? I would recommend you read more and learn correct grammatical legal English.
I got pulled over for the 4th time 2 nights ago. Honestly the most humble copper ive been stopped by. Straight away he explained that why I got pulled over, did my licence checks and complimented my car then sent me on my way
@@AB-ns2ttprobably warning for plate if it’s first time being brought to police attention and they ripped off the windscreen tint. That’s assuming the officer was being nice
I've ridden motorbikes for 50 years now, and have been pulled for moving traffic violations 12 times. Always a polite chat explaining why I was stopped and then sent on my way. But those days are long gone. I still ride spiritedly but honestly I very rarely see any traffic police any more. It seems to be all cameras, at least in my area.
26:45 You can hear the struggle in Owens voice. Remembering the likely countless times he's had to deal with things that would leave any person traumatised. Give the man a hug. 👍
I make the argument that 20 is more dangerous than 30. Reason being, people chance pulling out on you and peds chance crossing because of the slower speed. Where I live there have been more accidents because of the changes, less fatalities yes, but more accidents overall.
Most accidents (excluding speeding police vehicles hitting cars and people) according to the police reports I have read over the last 20 years, have clearly stated that they were at under 20mph on 30mph roads and a lot involving children were within 30ft of crossings, some were in car parks and others caused by bikes being ridden across red lights with the usual no lights used on bikes at night. A few were drunk/drugged people wandering over roads and two falling under buses. Two were from "street furniture" being hit and falling on to pedestrians, killing them, and a bizarre one was a man that stopped to help when two cars run in to each other was hit by a car as he run across the road. A lot of low speed bumps are due to the distraction caused by roadside TV screens playing videos of adverts to drivers - who else are they aimed at and why are they even allowed. These are actually approved by ROSPA and City Councils which I find odd, it must pay well.
My argument with the 20mph limit is why is the pedestrian in the road without looking or using a crossing in the first place. Seems like you can’t fix stupid so you penalise the driver instead. Secondly 20mph does not help the environment, you’re driving for longer and looking at your cars mpg at 20mph with tell you everything you need to know about whether it’s working. Side note, disabling your stop start is not illegal and has nothing to do with safety.
Its not penalising the driver, its forbidding the driver from creating a danger. 20mph or 30 km/h is the highest speed at which pedestrian safety is still very good any less and the return is negligible whereas 30mph is significantly more dangerous. I recommend watching the Not Just Bikes video.
exactly, there are a lot of instances where pedestrians are crossing without looking whilst it is infeasible for me to give way, such as turning off of a free-flowing high speed road or pedestrians acting nonchalant at a zebra crossing, leaving you confused as to whether they intend to use it, and then they step out unexpectedly. 20mph and a lower speed in general isn't going to solve the root problem, which is poor driver/pedestrian behaviour etc
@@audify3833 If you can see them near a zebra especially, and can't stop, your going too fast. They have a right to just walk into the zebra, thats the point of the zebra.
11:15, I didn't know the rear brake light flashed as part of the lighting pattern. As always George and Owen, a great insightful video. Hopefully a lot safer world out there
At 63 years old and driving for43 years I have only been pulled over once and the officer was very polite it was new years eve and they were randomly stopping cars to check that people were not drink driving which I was not . And I have brought up all my children to always be respectful if they ever get pulled over because the officer will probably treat them the same way
Thank you both also whoever helped make this video out for taking the time to raise awareness with such tremendous effort and great presentation to get the message delivered to the public
I do not see many police cars "cruising" around the roads in South London or the M25/M23. They are only seen when the blues and twos are on. I think this is the reason for the drop in driving standards. Good explanatory video, some useful tips.
Been waiting for this for a long time definitely will give young and new drivers a better perspective on better safe driving Keep up the amazing work George and owen Been following the road safety since the beginning
Sad to say it's irrelevant to them.. ive been young and stupid but some of these kids are really stupid. If im doing some spirit driving then look in the mirror ive had many times a young lad in a fiesta or whatever is pushing his car to the limits to try keep up, freaks me out.. maybe ive just grown up
If all officers were as pleasant as Owen, it would be great. And more importantly, this needs to be taught in all driving education. Driving tests are far too easy. No bad weather driving, no skid training just in case of black ice or snow. Judge said to me “ignorance of the rules is no excuse” the fact is, the driving test doesn’t give you all the rules.
If you car is equipped with either car play or android auto there is no need to have your phone in sight, keep it in your pocket or in the glovebox.... less chance of distraction.
I’ve had many friends pulled at an excess of 130, even caught drifting on the spot. They were extremely respectful with the interaction and let off with warnings, the worst was a section 59. This is not to encourage dangerous driving or to say you can get away with it. But it shows how important your attitude and behaviour is.
It is inappropriate speed that can kill, not all speed kills, it depends on many factors or response driving and class 3 drivers would not be allowed over the limits.
Depends. Doing over 100 in a shitty early 00's 1 litre amd you're gonna get pulled over in germany. Its less about the speed you are going and more about if your driving is safe. @hanshartfiel6394
puting a downpipe in the same realm with cut springs or bad tire is just not justifiable. Downpipe is emissions & enviroment while the others are clear endangerments. Pulling over on a motorway is not advisable but if u had a rough experience with the police in that country you would do that just to endanger them and mess with them. Did that on a rainy day in romania and that officer was so angry that he wanted to throw the book at me and while oppening a door I have scarred an oncoming traffic and in front of me was a pile-up. The law is in my favour since there was no contact and no accident. The police man had a pretty tuff job afterwards with the pile up, no one was injured, just 12 cars being damaged and the police man asked me why I threw care to the wind, and I explained after he closed the camera that I simply want not to be misunderstood by the police and for them to engage in a chase and that the moment that they asked me to show the fire extinguisher I did as told.
The Betari Box is not a one way street. Several years ago I was given 'attitude' from the off by a particularly obnoxious police officer. He tried to target me for an (according to him) illegal number plate. Unfortunately he was completely unaware of Section 14a of the 2002 Amendment to the Regulations. I don't know what his problem was (lack of sleep, had a row with his domestic partner, whatever) but he was a total embarrassment to that particular constabulary. I have only ever been stopped twice and the other time the officer was 100% professional in his dealing.
Got pulled over for a small plate in my jap-import MR2. I had a print-out of the legislation that says imported cars CAN have smaller plates but he wasn't interested. It was snowing, I'd just given my missus a lift to work and I was wearing shorts and a t-shirt. Cop tells me I have to get out of the car because he thinks I might try to flee... from a situation where I KNOW he's wrong and I'm right?! He then keeps me standing in the snow for 50 minutes while he checks my details and verifies what I've told him. At one point I hear him, on the radio, saying "Nah, no rush. Whenever you get a chance". After 50 minutes he hands the printout back to me, tells me I'm free to go and finishes with "You'd save yourself a lot of trouble if you had a normal size plate". Ah well, I'm sure forcing me to stand in the snow for 50 minutes soothed his inferiority complex.
Much like yourself, I was pulled over by a complete moron looking for trouble , from the very beginning of our interaction . In the end , he was thankfully calmed down by his companion . Although it might not have ended so nicely if his companion wasn't there with him at that time . Unless you've met a police officer that behaves in that manner, which you yourself have , then you have no idea how so many crucial things literally hang in the balance , at that particular moment .
Never mistake politeness for respect, know your rights, never talk to the cops unless legally required to do so, cops will *always* use anything you say as evidence, e.g. Have you been drinking tonight sir? Wrong Answer: only a couple of beers. Right Answer: No comment. Make them prove any offence.
It's comforting to know our roads have guardian angels on them! I won't go into personal reasons but my wholehearted gratitude goes out to our traffic police. They see as much as any military vet ever has and get nowhere near the respect they deserve. They do both an horrific yet brilliant job at the same time. Much love and often in my gratitude prayers all year round for the challenges they have to face. This mom loves you and is very thankful to God that you exist Xxx
I’ve just heard on this video that you should ring 999 if you are being stopped by an unmarked vehicle and suspect it isn’t genuine. If you are on your own how can you do this without using your mobile phone while driving?
I have just watched this video. It's really interesting and there are lots of good points. I was in a motorcycle accident just over 7 weeks ago. There was a broken down lorry on a single carriage way, with a 50 mile an hour , but I was travelling a little slower when I came across some mud and wet leave. In fact, it was a sunny day. Then, I drove to an area that shaded so slowed down. Nothing was behind me at this point. I came across a broken down lorry, so I stopped. My foot slipped, and my bike went. The lorry driver and his assistant helped me pick up the bike, the bike was ok. Then I asked the lorry driver if he would let me know if the road was clear. They were about to do that and I was just getting back on the bike when I was told to move. Which I was unable to do. I was rear-ended by van. I was hit then ended in a fence. I had some injuries. The van driver scarpered on foot and left his van, mainly because he couldn't drive his van away. So he ran away. Fortunately my bike was not written off. But the driver was uninsured and has not been identified. I have been riding bikes for years and this the first time I have had a motorcycle accident. I was breathalyse which was negative, I don't drink alcohol at all and don't ride my motorcycle when I am tired. I have had to apoint a solicitor to claim for an injury compensation.
GCM, I think it's pertinent to elaborate on some of the signals that Police might look for for confirmation that you are going to comply with the stop, but want to go somewhere that you feel is safer. Would things a flash of the hazards or a brief left-hand signal be enough, or would the officer initiating the stop be looking for something else?
I have been pulled over twice, once when going through traffic controlled road works, I was following a very slow tractor and had gone past the sign that says wait here, the light’s changed to amber and red, I had no choice but to continue otherwise I would have stopped in no man’s land, however the copper wouldn’t have it and said that I should have stopped ! Another time I turned right at traffic lights displaying a green filter, pulled over and the copper said that it’s a no right turn ? I argued my case and offered to walk back and show him how the lights worked, he just said be more careful, got in his car and drove off ! As another point, a few weeks ago I witnessed a traffic officer on his phone while going around a roundabout, he was laughing his head off.
At 18:55, He said, " if you don't produce your Driving Licence etc, "you are committing an offence", which is NOT the case, as the police are by law required to issue a HO/RT1, called a producer, requiring you to produce the asked documents later at a police station of your choice within 7 days, and if this is done and the documents are in good order, then thats the end of the matter.
It was not mentioned because the HORT1 is rarely used these days as most documents are available online and can be seen at the roadside. The RTA 1988 provided the HORT seven day system as a ‘defence’ to not being able to produce at the time of the request as it was acknowledged that people didn’t always carry the documents on them.
Only been pulled over once, on my motorcycle. Turns out, wet, miserable evening and dark that my rear lights were out ...a bulb can blow at any time and frankly, glad that the blue lights that pulled me over were on a police car to point out the issue - than an ambulance coming to scrape me off the road because another car had unwittingly not seen me. Being a nerd, I carry spare bulbs and was able to sort myself out on the roadside, but be friendly and courteous with the police, they'll be just the same back with you 🙂
I drive thousand of miles a year and rarely see police on motorways anymore. Middle and outside lane huggers not even doing 70mph causing problems More cars now undertaking !dangerous practice. I do see more money making speed vans on the bridges daily which doesn’t educate anybody.
Honestly with the amount of people that drive on worn brake pads or tyres with the cord showing, or just getting their car serviced once a year, a higher motorway speed limit would just lead to more accidents and break downs on the hard shoulder..... where there is one nowadays, otherwise lane 1.
The 20 limits need to be lifted after a certain time. Fair enough 20 while kids are about or the elderly, but after 9 pm they should change to 30 where possible
Definatley an informative video, I've been pulled twice on the motorway riding a 125cc motorbike, both stops were to check I had the correct licence and not just taken the L plates off. Both stops were plesant even though I was anxious. Many thanks to Owen and yourself.
Something to add to increasing speed and stopping is that your brakes have to reduce the momentum of the vehicle. Basic physics dictates momentum is massive x speed x speed (MV²) which means double the speed is 4 times the momentum
@@Williams2896 Oh, it's their job to make baseless assumptions and accusations. Sorry, my bad! I suppose a stopped clock is correct twice a day. Heaven forbid establishing facts with good investigative methodology when you can just point fingers and it not matter if you're wrong.
I had a stop night of the GE, about 1am. I was tired, and frankly very nervous seeing those blue lights flash up. Officers were really polite, even as I had to blow the breathalyzer (zero). Was let go with some advice for having longer rests late at night, avoiding driving that late if possible. I don't think I've driven after midnight since.
As an expat living in Canada, when it comes to speeding we have a tougher stance and it's only for going over any speed limit by 31mph Anyone driving a motor vehicle 50 Km/hr or more, over a speed limit, may be charged with stunting. The fine for stunting in Nova Scotia is $2,422.50 for a first offence, six points on your licence and an immediate seven-day roadside licence suspension.
One question I have for Owen: I feel like the 20mph zones being rolled out everywhere has made everyone including myself more impatient and less tolerable with speed limits, especially the speed limits on the motorway just for congestion relief, or claimed pollution reduction. Have you seen an increase in people breaking the speed limit since these zones have started rolling out? In my opinion, the more restricted we are becoming, the less people will feel like following the law. I'm not asking for an increase in speed on the motorway or local areas, I just feel like the restrictions are going a bit too far. Edit: a situation i faced many years ago, was potentially a drunk driver in front of myself while i was on a motorcyle, sat at the speed limit on the motorway. I had something thrown at me from the window of the car that hit my helmet. Then proceeded to brake check me. I slowed right down and moved to lane 1 which he followed suit and tried again. Admittedly, I broke the law speeding away past him, because i was going to die if i didn't do anything to put it bluntly. I got off the motorway at the next turning, and parked away where I wasnt followed. My worry is that if i had been pulled over, I could have explained it. If a camera had caught me, preserving my life would probably mean nothing. I think there is becoming a very fine line with situations like that.
Before someone suggests why I didn't report it. I didn't have time to read his number plate, I was too focused not being hit. I had a big target on me for some reason.
Speed limit signs are obviously there for a very good reason,as are speed cameras ,as a Driver of nearly 50 years experience (33 years as a HGV 1 Royal Mail Driver) I have 2 main complaints (I) make the speed limit signs visible (not obscured by trees/bushes etc ) & (ii) cut down on the actual cameras! An inexperienced driver who is on an unfamiliar road is spending as much time looking for the bloody things than they are actually watching where they are going!…..BANG!!!…Accident.😤
A really good explanation on all points that Policing is not out there to get you... once you have crossed the barrier from being a "no hassle in 30yrs" driver to a victim of a life changing incident, you will look at the Police in a different manner, not saying that everyone should appreciate them, just that the main reason for their existence is to serve and protect
The amound of idiots I see driving around with a handsfree system installed in their car or van but still holding their phone upto their ear still makes me laugh
Im sorry what Owen said about avoiding potholes looks like someone maybe drunk or impaired somehow is just bollox. Lots of people avoid pot holes, I do it all the time and see others doing it. When I see a car do it, I know they just avoided a pothole. How do I know? Well, im following them and I can see the pot hole(s) so its clear they avoided something, which demonstrates they ARE paying attention and in control.
Also don't different police gangs have their own territory? If so they should be familiar with potholes in their territory, I know where all the really bad ones are on routes I drive often like my 55 mile commute to work.
I agree with you, wheel alignments are not cheap especially when they cause your tyres to wear out prematurely. A pot hole can seriously throw out your front end alignment and cause an imbalance in the wheel. Save yourself the hassle and avoid potholes
10:40 if you are drunk, refuse the test. Cause as much delay without resistance as possible. Give your body as much time as you can to get down to a legal limit. Play off the fsct your drunk, stumble fall say youre going to vomit from the stress of being around police. Say you feel ill and so on. Dont get yourself done at the scene as while the mobile breathalyser is a tool for evidence the one they use as proper evidence is in the station. When arrested make yourself moving, keep blood flowing and breathe at a faster pace. Of course if youre hammed to hell you wont remember any of this but if youre just over the limit follow this advice, it could help you. If they ask why you refused at the scene say you felt uncomfortable around that/those officers and felt they may have contaminated the test. Just say thats how you felt not what they did. Dont resist doing the test at the station, and say from the start youre happy to do a test at the station but not with officers you feel you cant trust. I dont condone drink driving but people make mistakes and can learn from them. Im 6 months sober and have never drink and drove, this is just my advice
That's your advice is it. And when you refuse the breath test what do you think the officer will say 'no problem sir' and let you go! Well good luck with trying that because if you refuse the test you will still lose your licence and often for a longer period and a fine. Basically, you won't get away with it, not a chance.
@tilerman ... you didn't read the whole comment did you. They won't let you go, I even say refuse the test and let them arrest you so you can get tested at the station under the give of "not feeling safe with those officers".
Seeing collisions / fatalities does affect my road use. I ride a motorbike, so normally filter in long tailbacks to get to the front, where often there is a bad accident, now when I see blue lights ahead I pull over before I get to the front as just don’t want to see this level of trauma / anguish
Don't use phones but dial 999, surely there's another solution cause what if the officer see you touching your phone to call 999 then that's more unnecessary issues
Got pulled over in broad daylight two coppers, both about 6f4, did all the checks, but in the process, one of them tried to get me to lose my cool when that didn't work he accused me of being too calm
I think this is a great channel and I really enjoy the videos one question I have quite often I see traffic officers or police dealing with incidents in live Lane and all in black with no hi Vis surely in this day and age of health and safety an officer should always have hi Vis in a live Lane keep up the good work and thank you
Found this extremely informative and interesting, main concern is, pedestrians crossing, whilst glued to their phones and not concentrating. Really good video, thank you.
That's why I'd recommend a dash cam. You can prove from that you were driving appropriately and took relevant action to a moron blindly stepping into the road.
@@damienmcdonald7610 Many wait at junctions and jump on to cars, get taken to hospital and fill out the form found in adverts inside A&E for no win no fee solicitors.
I drive quite a lot on the M5 in Devon and Somerset and these days, surprise, surprise, is that many more people seem to be travelling more slowly or at least within tolerances above the limit. Maybe it's to save on fuel. However, and this is where we need more road policing, many people seem to think that the same speed limit applies when it is pouring with rain and conditions are difficult. Officially it does but the French, sensibly, think otherwise and so should we. A camera van is neither use nor ornament in these circumstances. As for potholes, it should be plain and obvious to a following police officer that there has been an unusual manoeuvre to avoid a pothole if the driving is otherwise ok and not an excuse to stop someone. So they might be pulling someone who is trying, maybe on an unfamiliar road, to avoid a burst tyre and crash.
They need to put more of those cameras on the roads that catch people using mobile phones, I drive 1000 miles a week on average and see so many people on their phones while driving, they're always driving terribly too due to being distracted by the phone!
If you kill or maim whilst driving drunk, drugged or distracted by texting or otherwise manipulating a phone or similar; then aside of any custodial and financial penalties, you should never be allowed to drive again in this country. Only when the lifetime loss of the perpetrator's driving licence is introduced in legislation and applied by the courts will hard-core offenders and those indifferent to the right to life of other people consider their selfish behaviour because of its effects and affects upon themselves.
If you agree with the foregoing paragraph, please copy and paste and share as you see fit, perhaps including your MP. Let's encourage the people we know who do this to think again and the politicians to properly change the law. A driving licence is a privilege to permit the holder get around and / or earn a living - it is not permission to selfishly kill or maim other innocent people with impunity.
With regards a deaf person being pulled over, is there any way that the vehicle reg can be flagged if a driver has a disability? then the officers would have a heads up and be able to deal with the drivers needs.
18:47, Am I right in thinking that in the UK it’s not a legal requirement to need to have your driving license, Mot certificate or insurance details with you when driving. Definitely not a good idea to leave these documents in the car anyway in case it’s stolen.
It is a legal requirement to provide your licence, MOT cert and insurance cert when requested by a police officer. Failure to do so is an offence. But there is a statutory defence if you produce it to the required police station within 7 days. Long story short, as long as you turn up at a police station with it within 7 days, you're good. Carrying it with you avoids having to fart around taking it to a police station, however.
@@boostar155a friend of mine carried his docs with him ,including V5,and had his car stolen,never recovered the car,they probably took it to a chop shop. as it was years ago that's why I don't carry docs in my car
I think that it should be a requirement to carry your licence every time you get in a vehicle. It might save a lot of time. But the police can check quickly if you are on their insurance database.
If there is something that I really don't like is people driving and using the phone at the same time and tailgating is so annoying and frustrating to me seeing this happening.
I witnessed 3 South Yorkshire police motorcyclist in the afternoon of Wed 23rd Oct in lane three, south bound of the M1 at J36 going well above the 70 limit without lights & sirens. Rule for one & a rule for the others.
Thank you for the videos... I have a question. Was going down a 2 lane road, speed limit was 50Mph kept to the left lane with cruise control on... I saw a group of cars doing 40Mph so naturally went to the right lane and started passing all the cars with cruise control on. Noticed that all the cars were behind a police car, none of them would go past... since I had my cruise control on, I''ve gone past them, then joined back the left lane gettin in front of the police car. As soon as I did that the police car sped up and started following me really, really closely!!! I would consider dangerously close to me. Under 2 meters I would guess following distance. In case of an emergency they would have collided with me for sure... They did that for more than 1 mile. they just turned off after a while, but I would consider they put me and themselves in danger. What can I do in case it happens again??? It was quite stressful having a car following me from a really really dangerous distance. Never had any issues with police, no speeding tickets, ever and car is perfectly road legal. I was about to put my hazards on and pull over as it was dangerous. again... What can I do in case it happens again?
Hi can you guys make video about red light cameras how it works and when it gets activated Also please make video about the speeding cameras as well how much allows you above the speed limit..? Please
Ive been stopped 5 times when i was on a 125. Had the "vechile fits description of stolen vechile" and the "thats not a 125" which is just pathetic when i was doing less than 60 mph on the dualie i got pulled on. For them to them inspect the bike (tread depth, lights etc) LOOKING for things to get me done for after they found it was in fact a 125cc.
Appears to be a reasonable policeman. over here in Australia I lived in Melbourne, there was a time bogus police were pulling cars over. I always told my daughter to drive to a servo or police station.
Great video , could u ask Owen what he thinks about people driving under the speed limit , for instance driving a 30 in 60 etc.. When I did my test I would have been failed for that, a lot of crashes are because of young motorists in underpowered cars over taking slow drivers.
30 in a 60 is a bit dangerous. I often go 40 in a de restricted as dear can run out into the road and any other animals or people doing a dangerous overtake coming the other direction. Also on smart motorways I always go 10mph what they say sometimes even 15mph incase the signs changed what was displayed. Also a lot of people are trying to save fuel now.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
If speed cameras are about safety then take the money element out of it.
If you just give points instead, then people who don’t learn will lose their license.
When money comes into the equation, that always looks like the main reason rather than safety.
Yes, I couldn't agree more!!! It gives the impression of a means to raise money. And the fine is more of a hit to low income households too.
It's no secret that motorcycles are awesome. They practically have the lowest emissions, fun, good for commuting, therapy, cheap to run and maintain, great for the environment and ease of traffic, among other benefits.
However, the greedy British government and policy makers has double standards. On one hand they say they care about the environment, ulez scams, congestion scams, encouraging cyclists, making special provisions for them, and on the other hand, discouraging and over taxing low to zero emissions motorcycles.
For example. I own a 2016 hyundai i10 with a yearly tax of £20 for approximately a 998cc car, with around 109 carbon emissions.
But, for 125cc motorcycles the yearly tax is the same £20 with virtually zero emissions. Please note the fact that this is a low cc motorcycle too.
And as the cc increases in motorcycles like 300, 600, 1000, the yearly tax increases on them too.
So the fact is that, cars are taxed on emissions and motorcycles differently on horsepower, just to justify taxation on them.
How is this not greed and discrimination against motorcycles?
No one in power really cares about the environment. Its all a big fat cash cow.
Have a nice day and ride safe.
Fines are not income equitable but they are a tax you can avoid..
They are nothing to do with safety. When a group of local residents asked for a speed check or van to be put on a road that had people doing 45+ in a 30 past an OAP home and school, they were told by the head of the Speed Camera Partnership in the North West that the vans are expensive to deploy. A full survey is required first to capture data of which times most people speed between, to make it cost effective. So if most were thought to be speeding between 8-9am and 9-10pm, they would put the van out only if they could get back enough in fines to make a profit.
Now we have 20mph limits, which have no Traffic Orders and are not enforced in most areas legally, the risk to road users has increased.
Most accidents on 30mph roads are at or below 20mph and have been for years. The reason for 20 limits was to cause congestion by restricting the flow of traffic in order to suggest there was suddenly more cars on the road or congestion - leading to further taxes.
Yep it’s not bad enough we pay for the cameras, the people watching the cams, the roads to be closed when they are put up and to keep them safe to travel on. After the tax payers pay all of that then they pay fines from everything we have already paid for. By a police force we also pay for… we also pay for the sports cars they drive to catch’s us and there road tax and insurance and maintenance. The working tax payers pays for the whole f’up system.
If avoiding potholes was an olympic sport then the UK would win gold. everyday on my way to work avoiding them has become game, there is always a new one to find.
I know every pot hole on my route now. I have to turn lane assist off though or it goes crazy.
I recall decades ago on a Heavy Vehicle driving test
( to obtain a MILITARY Heavy Vehicle drivers License )
I hit a somewhat large pot-hole
The Instructor said:
You did well to avoid the small potholes but you managed
hit a big one.
To which I replied :
It wasn't there yesterday -- it must have been a new one I did not know about.
Anyway - a MILITARY driving test is far more intensive and critical than
a civilian driving test.
Last time I got pulled over it was because I was "driving like somebody who's trying to avoid attention from the police".
Can't win, I guess. 🙄
Are you sure it was the LAST time --
When you are pulled over again - you will realize that it was NOT the last time.
Do you even know what the word LAST means in the English language ?
Do you know the difference between LAST and Previous.
Do you know what the LAST day of your life will mean ?
I would recommend you read more and learn correct
grammatical legal English.
@@XRAF-633........ooooooh, the grammar police is truly strongest within your blackheart
This genuinely should be shown in all schools and colleges
I got pulled over for the 4th time 2 nights ago. Honestly the most humble copper ive been stopped by. Straight away he explained that why I got pulled over, did my licence checks and complimented my car then sent me on my way
I was stopped for tinted plates and front window tints... as long as you treat the officers with respect, you'll have less problems
Did the officers treat you with respect? If so I’m happy…
So you have to act creepy to please the officer?
@@foppo100 Showing someone respect isn't being creepy it's common decency ... maybe you're not aware of the concept?
What was the consequence for having both of those?
@@AB-ns2ttprobably warning for plate if it’s first time being brought to police attention and they ripped off the windscreen tint. That’s assuming the officer was being nice
I've ridden motorbikes for 50 years now, and have been pulled for moving traffic violations 12 times. Always a polite chat explaining why I was stopped and then sent on my way. But those days are long gone. I still ride spiritedly but honestly I very rarely see any traffic police any more. It seems to be all cameras, at least in my area.
26:45 You can hear the struggle in Owens voice. Remembering the likely countless times he's had to deal with things that would leave any person traumatised. Give the man a hug. 👍
school children should see this
Just not a bag of cocaine falling out the pocket of a police officer in a nursery, a kindergarten or primary school while being dropped of by them.
@@De5O54 yeah
Why?
Parents on the school run should see it too.
@@stevegoodfellow3423 What
What a fantastic police officer Really impressed at the job he does
I make the argument that 20 is more dangerous than 30. Reason being, people chance pulling out on you and peds chance crossing because of the slower speed. Where I live there have been more accidents because of the changes, less fatalities yes, but more accidents overall.
Most accidents (excluding speeding police vehicles hitting cars and people) according to the police reports I have read over the last 20 years, have clearly stated that they were at under 20mph on 30mph roads and a lot involving children were within 30ft of crossings, some were in car parks and others caused by bikes being ridden across red lights with the usual no lights used on bikes at night. A few were drunk/drugged people wandering over roads and two falling under buses. Two were from "street furniture" being hit and falling on to pedestrians, killing them, and a bizarre one was a man that stopped to help when two cars run in to each other was hit by a car as he run across the road.
A lot of low speed bumps are due to the distraction caused by roadside TV screens playing videos of adverts to drivers - who else are they aimed at and why are they even allowed. These are actually approved by ROSPA and City Councils which I find odd, it must pay well.
My argument with the 20mph limit is why is the pedestrian in the road without looking or using a crossing in the first place. Seems like you can’t fix stupid so you penalise the driver instead. Secondly 20mph does not help the environment, you’re driving for longer and looking at your cars mpg at 20mph with tell you everything you need to know about whether it’s working.
Side note, disabling your stop start is not illegal and has nothing to do with safety.
Its not penalising the driver, its forbidding the driver from creating a danger. 20mph or 30 km/h is the highest speed at which pedestrian safety is still very good any less and the return is negligible whereas 30mph is significantly more dangerous. I recommend watching the Not Just Bikes video.
Should only be around high density housing and high footfall areas in my book.
exactly, there are a lot of instances where pedestrians are crossing without looking whilst it is infeasible for me to give way, such as turning off of a free-flowing high speed road or pedestrians acting nonchalant at a zebra crossing, leaving you confused as to whether they intend to use it, and then they step out unexpectedly. 20mph and a lower speed in general isn't going to solve the root problem, which is poor driver/pedestrian behaviour etc
@@PCDelorian Anti-car lefty nonsense masquerading as safety issue....
@@audify3833 If you can see them near a zebra especially, and can't stop, your going too fast. They have a right to just walk into the zebra, thats the point of the zebra.
straight from the police public relations dept. this hides the frequent bullying, lying and agression that the police often enjoy.
11:15, I didn't know the rear brake light flashed as part of the lighting pattern. As always George and Owen, a great insightful video. Hopefully a lot safer world out there
Owen sounds much better than some officers I have encountered over the years, just for some minor road traffic mistakes.
Thankyou.
At 63 years old and driving for43 years I have only been pulled over once and the officer was very polite it was new years eve and they were randomly stopping cars to check that people were not drink driving which I was not . And I have brought up all my children to always be respectful if they ever get pulled over because the officer will probably treat them the same way
Very nice Steve love ya. I wish I was your son
@@Covkid thank you
Thank you both also whoever helped make this video out for taking the time to raise awareness with such tremendous effort and great presentation to get the message delivered to the public
Our pleasure!
I do not see many police cars "cruising" around the roads in South London or the M25/M23. They are only seen when the blues and twos are on. I think this is the reason for the drop in driving standards. Good explanatory video, some useful tips.
No the drop in driving standards is down to the flood of invading immigrants, and immigrants teaching people to drive.
@@theenglishtrucker1849Racist.
@@theenglishtrucker1849 That's bollocks
@englishtrucker what a dumb reply.
@@theenglishtrucker1849 Very true, its all gone to shit in the last 20 years. People just scared to be called words and act like sheep.
Been waiting for this for a long time definitely will give young and new drivers a better perspective on better safe driving
Keep up the amazing work
George and owen
Been following the road safety since the beginning
Sad to say it's irrelevant to them.. ive been young and stupid but some of these kids are really stupid. If im doing some spirit driving then look in the mirror ive had many times a young lad in a fiesta or whatever is pushing his car to the limits to try keep up, freaks me out.. maybe ive just grown up
Having been pulled over by Owen I can 100% vouch for his attitude. Absolute legend on the road. Gives the police a good name for sure
If all officers were as pleasant as Owen, it would be great. And more importantly, this needs to be taught in all driving education. Driving tests are far too easy. No bad weather driving, no skid training just in case of black ice or snow. Judge said to me “ignorance of the rules is no excuse” the fact is, the driving test doesn’t give you all the rules.
If you car is equipped with either car play or android auto there is no need to have your phone in sight, keep it in your pocket or in the glovebox.... less chance of distraction.
I’ve had many friends pulled at an excess of 130, even caught drifting on the spot. They were extremely respectful with the interaction and let off with warnings, the worst was a section 59. This is not to encourage dangerous driving or to say you can get away with it. But it shows how important your attitude and behaviour is.
I quite frequently do speeds of 120 to 140 mph and sometimes even more and never had a problem.
Same, as long as you are safe and responsible with it and don't act like a dickhead if pulled over, it really isn't an issue
@@audify3833 actually, I do that in Germany, it's legal over there
@@hanshartfiel6394 Same I do it in Mexico, completely legal there
It is inappropriate speed that can kill, not all speed kills, it depends on many factors or response driving and class 3 drivers would not be allowed over the limits.
Depends. Doing over 100 in a shitty early 00's 1 litre amd you're gonna get pulled over in germany. Its less about the speed you are going and more about if your driving is safe. @hanshartfiel6394
You two are doing such a good service to the public 👏
puting a downpipe in the same realm with cut springs or bad tire is just not justifiable. Downpipe is emissions & enviroment while the others are clear endangerments.
Pulling over on a motorway is not advisable but if u had a rough experience with the police in that country you would do that just to endanger them and mess with them. Did that on a rainy day in romania and that officer was so angry that he wanted to throw the book at me and while oppening a door I have scarred an oncoming traffic and in front of me was a pile-up. The law is in my favour since there was no contact and no accident. The police man had a pretty tuff job afterwards with the pile up, no one was injured, just 12 cars being damaged and the police man asked me why I threw care to the wind, and I explained after he closed the camera that I simply want not to be misunderstood by the police and for them to engage in a chase and that the moment that they asked me to show the fire extinguisher I did as told.
The Betari Box is not a one way street. Several years ago I was given 'attitude' from the off by a particularly obnoxious police officer. He tried to target me for an (according to him) illegal number plate. Unfortunately he was completely unaware of Section 14a of the 2002 Amendment to the Regulations. I don't know what his problem was (lack of sleep, had a row with his domestic partner, whatever) but he was a total embarrassment to that particular constabulary. I have only ever been stopped twice and the other time the officer was 100% professional in his dealing.
Thanks for saving me the bother of writing exactly the same thing👍🏻
Got pulled over for a small plate in my jap-import MR2.
I had a print-out of the legislation that says imported cars CAN have smaller plates but he wasn't interested.
It was snowing, I'd just given my missus a lift to work and I was wearing shorts and a t-shirt.
Cop tells me I have to get out of the car because he thinks I might try to flee... from a situation where I KNOW he's wrong and I'm right?!
He then keeps me standing in the snow for 50 minutes while he checks my details and verifies what I've told him.
At one point I hear him, on the radio, saying "Nah, no rush. Whenever you get a chance".
After 50 minutes he hands the printout back to me, tells me I'm free to go and finishes with "You'd save yourself a lot of trouble if you had a normal size plate".
Ah well, I'm sure forcing me to stand in the snow for 50 minutes soothed his inferiority complex.
Much like yourself, I was pulled over by a complete moron looking for trouble , from the very beginning of our interaction .
In the end , he was thankfully calmed down by his companion .
Although it might not have ended so nicely if his companion wasn't there with him at that time .
Unless you've met a police officer that behaves in that manner, which you yourself have , then you have no idea how so many crucial things literally hang in the balance , at that particular moment .
Never mistake politeness for respect, know your rights, never talk to the cops unless legally required to do so, cops will *always* use anything you say as evidence, e.g. Have you been drinking tonight sir? Wrong Answer: only a couple of beers. Right Answer: No comment. Make them prove any offence.
22:36 My grandfather always told us that 15 over was an automatic ban. It wasn't true, but it kept my friends & I below the speed limit.
I am a driving instructor and this is great. Thank you.
It's comforting to know our roads have guardian angels on them! I won't go into personal reasons but my wholehearted gratitude goes out to our traffic police. They see as much as any military vet ever has and get nowhere near the respect they deserve. They do both an horrific yet brilliant job at the same time. Much love and often in my gratitude prayers all year round for the challenges they have to face. This mom loves you and is very thankful to God that you exist Xxx
I’ve just heard on this video that you should ring 999 if you are being stopped by an unmarked vehicle and suspect it isn’t genuine. If you are on your own how can you do this without using your mobile phone while driving?
"siri... dial 999"
assuming you have voice control activated tho
I have just watched this video. It's really interesting and there are lots of good points. I was in a motorcycle accident just over 7 weeks ago. There was a broken down lorry on a single carriage way, with a 50 mile an hour , but I was travelling a little slower when I came across some mud and wet leave. In fact, it was a sunny day. Then, I drove to an area that shaded so slowed down. Nothing was behind me at this point. I came across a broken down lorry, so I stopped. My foot slipped, and my bike went. The lorry driver and his assistant helped me pick up the bike, the bike was ok. Then I asked the lorry driver if he would let me know if the road was clear. They were about to do that and I was just getting back on the bike when I was told to move. Which I was unable to do. I was rear-ended by van. I was hit then ended in a fence. I had some injuries. The van driver scarpered on foot and left his van, mainly because he couldn't drive his van away. So he ran away. Fortunately my bike was not written off. But the driver was uninsured and has not been identified. I have been riding bikes for years and this the first time I have had a motorcycle accident. I was breathalyse which was negative, I don't drink alcohol at all and don't ride my motorcycle when I am tired. I have had to apoint a solicitor to claim for an injury compensation.
GCM, I think it's pertinent to elaborate on some of the signals that Police might look for for confirmation that you are going to comply with the stop, but want to go somewhere that you feel is safer. Would things a flash of the hazards or a brief left-hand signal be enough, or would the officer initiating the stop be looking for something else?
I have been pulled over twice, once when going through traffic controlled road works, I was following a very slow tractor and had gone past the sign that says wait here, the light’s changed to amber and red, I had no choice but to continue otherwise I would have stopped in no man’s land, however the copper wouldn’t have it and said that I should have stopped !
Another time I turned right at traffic lights displaying a green filter, pulled over and the copper said that it’s a no right turn ? I argued my case and offered to walk back and show him how the lights worked, he just said be more careful, got in his car and drove off !
As another point, a few weeks ago I witnessed a traffic officer on his phone while going around a roundabout, he was laughing his head off.
At 18:55, He said, " if you don't produce your Driving Licence etc, "you are committing an offence", which is NOT the case, as the police are by law required to issue a HO/RT1, called a producer, requiring you to produce the asked documents later at a police station of your choice within 7 days, and if this is done and the documents are in good order, then thats the end of the matter.
It was not mentioned because the HORT1 is rarely used these days as most documents are available online and can be seen at the roadside. The RTA 1988 provided the HORT seven day system as a ‘defence’ to not being able to produce at the time of the request as it was acknowledged that people didn’t always carry the documents on them.
@GCMYT Just because it's rarely used, doesn't mean it should be left out. There is a reason it's there.
Very informative video, we need more Police officers like Owen.
The politest copper I've ever seen
I'd like to think he's like that all the time and 'not' like that just because of the video he's putting out???
Only been pulled over once, on my motorcycle. Turns out, wet, miserable evening and dark that my rear lights were out ...a bulb can blow at any time and frankly, glad that the blue lights that pulled me over were on a police car to point out the issue - than an ambulance coming to scrape me off the road because another car had unwittingly not seen me. Being a nerd, I carry spare bulbs and was able to sort myself out on the roadside, but be friendly and courteous with the police, they'll be just the same back with you 🙂
I drive thousand of miles a year and rarely see police on motorways anymore. Middle and outside lane huggers not even doing 70mph causing problems More cars now undertaking !dangerous practice. I do see more money making speed vans on the bridges daily which doesn’t educate anybody.
Honestly with the amount of people that drive on worn brake pads or tyres with the cord showing, or just getting their car serviced once a year, a higher motorway speed limit would just lead to more accidents and break downs on the hard shoulder..... where there is one nowadays, otherwise lane 1.
Really good video this, love the format of taking the time to explain things and see the more human side of policing and reasons as to why.
No-one carrys around their MOT certificate. It is all on the DVLA database,there is no need to carry around any paperwork with you.
The 20 limits need to be lifted after a certain time. Fair enough 20 while kids are about or the elderly, but after 9 pm they should change to 30 where possible
love this content, learn so much in many aspects keep up the good work both of you!
This is an excellent video. I really enjoyed watching it. Very informative. 👍
Very inspiring and a great perspective on why you could get pulled over. Love the channel and the work you do 💪🏻
I appreciate that!
Definatley an informative video, I've been pulled twice on the motorway riding a 125cc motorbike, both stops were to check I had the correct licence and not just taken the L plates off. Both stops were plesant even though I was anxious. Many thanks to Owen and yourself.
You're brave driving a 125 on a motorway, I tried it once online but it's too light, felt way safer on a heavier bike.
@@damienmcdonald7610 I'd never do it again!! I just couldn't afford the upgrade haha now I have a 600
Thank you,
doing a great job informing the public!
Something to add to increasing speed and stopping is that your brakes have to reduce the momentum of the vehicle. Basic physics dictates momentum is massive x speed x speed (MV²) which means double the speed is 4 times the momentum
24:35 you don't know they're drunk, either, yet very happy to make an immediate and serious accusation.
Well... Yeah? It's their job to assume and test whether people are drunk
@@Williams2896 Oh, it's their job to make baseless assumptions and accusations. Sorry, my bad! I suppose a stopped clock is correct twice a day. Heaven forbid establishing facts with good investigative methodology when you can just point fingers and it not matter if you're wrong.
I had a stop night of the GE, about 1am. I was tired, and frankly very nervous seeing those blue lights flash up.
Officers were really polite, even as I had to blow the breathalyzer (zero). Was let go with some advice for having longer rests late at night, avoiding driving that late if possible. I don't think I've driven after midnight since.
This is great ! Well done guys! Keep up the good work!
Thank you! Will do!
As an expat living in Canada, when it comes to speeding we have a tougher stance and it's only for going over any speed limit by 31mph
Anyone driving a motor vehicle 50 Km/hr or more, over a speed limit, may be charged with stunting. The fine for stunting in Nova Scotia is $2,422.50 for a first offence, six points on your licence and an immediate seven-day roadside licence suspension.
One question I have for Owen: I feel like the 20mph zones being rolled out everywhere has made everyone including myself more impatient and less tolerable with speed limits, especially the speed limits on the motorway just for congestion relief, or claimed pollution reduction. Have you seen an increase in people breaking the speed limit since these zones have started rolling out? In my opinion, the more restricted we are becoming, the less people will feel like following the law. I'm not asking for an increase in speed on the motorway or local areas, I just feel like the restrictions are going a bit too far. Edit: a situation i faced many years ago, was potentially a drunk driver in front of myself while i was on a motorcyle, sat at the speed limit on the motorway. I had something thrown at me from the window of the car that hit my helmet. Then proceeded to brake check me. I slowed right down and moved to lane 1 which he followed suit and tried again. Admittedly, I broke the law speeding away past him, because i was going to die if i didn't do anything to put it bluntly. I got off the motorway at the next turning, and parked away where I wasnt followed. My worry is that if i had been pulled over, I could have explained it. If a camera had caught me, preserving my life would probably mean nothing. I think there is becoming a very fine line with situations like that.
Before someone suggests why I didn't report it. I didn't have time to read his number plate, I was too focused not being hit. I had a big target on me for some reason.
Speed limit signs are obviously there for a very good reason,as are speed cameras ,as a Driver of nearly 50 years experience (33 years as a HGV 1 Royal Mail Driver) I have 2 main complaints (I) make the speed limit signs visible (not obscured by trees/bushes etc ) & (ii) cut down on the actual cameras! An inexperienced driver who is on an unfamiliar road is spending as much time looking for the bloody things than they are actually watching where they are going!…..BANG!!!…Accident.😤
I've had a bad attitude to police but these videos have changed my mind and he is lovely 🌹
Thankyou so much. That’s very kind
More forces need to put out videos like this. And there should be "shorts" on mainstream tv.
A really good explanation on all points that Policing is not out there to get you... once you have crossed the barrier from being a "no hassle in 30yrs" driver to a victim of a life changing incident, you will look at the Police in a different manner, not saying that everyone should appreciate them, just that the main reason for their existence is to serve and protect
You can say 'Call William Carver on speaker' and it will select speaker-phone, too
Really good video hands up 🆙 for you boys keep doing videos like that! Very educational and helpful!
The amound of idiots I see driving around with a handsfree system installed in their car or van but still holding their phone upto their ear still makes me laugh
Im sorry what Owen said about avoiding potholes looks like someone maybe drunk or impaired somehow is just bollox. Lots of people avoid pot holes, I do it all the time and see others doing it. When I see a car do it, I know they just avoided a pothole. How do I know? Well, im following them and I can see the pot hole(s) so its clear they avoided something, which demonstrates they ARE paying attention and in control.
Also don't different police gangs have their own territory? If so they should be familiar with potholes in their territory, I know where all the really bad ones are on routes I drive often like my 55 mile commute to work.
@theenglishtrucker1849 I agree in full👍🏻
I agree with you, wheel alignments are not cheap especially when they cause your tyres to wear out prematurely. A pot hole can seriously throw out your front end alignment and cause an imbalance in the wheel. Save yourself the hassle and avoid potholes
10:40 if you are drunk, refuse the test. Cause as much delay without resistance as possible. Give your body as much time as you can to get down to a legal limit.
Play off the fsct your drunk, stumble fall say youre going to vomit from the stress of being around police. Say you feel ill and so on. Dont get yourself done at the scene as while the mobile breathalyser is a tool for evidence the one they use as proper evidence is in the station.
When arrested make yourself moving, keep blood flowing and breathe at a faster pace.
Of course if youre hammed to hell you wont remember any of this but if youre just over the limit follow this advice, it could help you.
If they ask why you refused at the scene say you felt uncomfortable around that/those officers and felt they may have contaminated the test. Just say thats how you felt not what they did.
Dont resist doing the test at the station, and say from the start youre happy to do a test at the station but not with officers you feel you cant trust.
I dont condone drink driving but people make mistakes and can learn from them.
Im 6 months sober and have never drink and drove, this is just my advice
That's your advice is it. And when you refuse the breath test what do you think the officer will say 'no problem sir' and let you go! Well good luck with trying that because if you refuse the test you will still lose your licence and often for a longer period and a fine. Basically, you won't get away with it, not a chance.
@tilerman ... you didn't read the whole comment did you. They won't let you go, I even say refuse the test and let them arrest you so you can get tested at the station under the give of "not feeling safe with those officers".
Seeing collisions / fatalities does affect my road use. I ride a motorbike, so normally filter in long tailbacks to get to the front, where often there is a bad accident, now when I see blue lights ahead I pull over before I get to the front as just don’t want to see this level of trauma / anguish
I love these videos. Great job always seen you on the m5
Thankyou
As always really good video and great what you’re doing to educate people
Don't use phones but dial 999, surely there's another solution cause what if the officer see you touching your phone to call 999 then that's more unnecessary issues
Got pulled over in broad daylight two coppers, both about 6f4, did all the checks, but in the process, one of them tried to get me to lose my cool when that didn't work he accused me of being too calm
8:50 was the single greatest skill issue I have ever encountered
Fab video, thanks for the content
Just watch for Carly charging you a year after you purchase and not giving you any notice. They will refuse to refund you
I think this is a great channel and I really enjoy the videos one question I have quite often I see traffic officers or police dealing with incidents in live Lane and all in black with no hi Vis surely in this day and age of health and safety an officer should always have hi Vis in a live Lane keep up the good work and thank you
Found this extremely informative and interesting, main concern is, pedestrians crossing, whilst glued to their phones and not concentrating.
Really good video, thank you.
Glad it was helpful!
That's why I'd recommend a dash cam. You can prove from that you were driving appropriately and took relevant action to a moron blindly stepping into the road.
@@damienmcdonald7610 Many wait at junctions and jump on to cars, get taken to hospital and fill out the form found in adverts inside A&E for no win no fee solicitors.
Guy "deletes" all codes stored in the car to "fix" them and the proceeds to activate the seatbelt chime for added "safety". 😂
Fantastic educational piece.
Glad you think so!
I drive quite a lot on the M5 in Devon and Somerset and these days, surprise, surprise, is that many more people seem to be travelling more slowly or at least within tolerances above the limit. Maybe it's to save on fuel. However, and this is where we need more road policing, many people seem to think that the same speed limit applies when it is pouring with rain and conditions are difficult. Officially it does but the French, sensibly, think otherwise and so should we. A camera van is neither use nor ornament in these circumstances. As for potholes, it should be plain and obvious to a following police officer that there has been an unusual manoeuvre to avoid a pothole if the driving is otherwise ok and not an excuse to stop someone. So they might be pulling someone who is trying, maybe on an unfamiliar road, to avoid a burst tyre and crash.
17:25 officers including this one could literally just look to see if there is a pothole they were avoiding or not. Would save time for everyone.
They need to put more of those cameras on the roads that catch people using mobile phones, I drive 1000 miles a week on average and see so many people on their phones while driving, they're always driving terribly too due to being distracted by the phone!
If you don't break the law you don't need to worry about being pulled over. Simples.
If you kill or maim whilst driving drunk, drugged or distracted by texting or otherwise manipulating a phone or similar; then aside of any custodial and financial penalties, you should never be allowed to drive again in this country. Only when the lifetime loss of the perpetrator's driving licence is introduced in legislation and applied by the courts will hard-core offenders and those indifferent to the right to life of other people consider their selfish behaviour because of its effects and affects upon themselves.
If you agree with the foregoing paragraph, please copy and paste and share as you see fit, perhaps including your MP. Let's encourage the people we know who do this to think again and the politicians to properly change the law.
A driving licence is a privilege to permit the holder get around and / or earn a living - it is not permission to selfishly kill or maim other innocent people with impunity.
This is a good video. I have a question what is you opinion on driver style trackers fitted to vehicles e.g. light foot.
Very insightful as per usual thanks for the information
Using hey Siri on your phone may be legal but you should point out that if you’re using your phone when driving you are still heavily distracted
With regards a deaf person being pulled over, is there any way that the vehicle reg can be flagged if a driver has a disability? then the officers would have a heads up and be able to deal with the drivers needs.
6 points isn't enough for a mobile phone offence. Make it an instant ban.
Nah, confiscate the phone, & ban offenders having one.
Far bigger deterrent than a driving ban.
Karen it should be 3 points
Really informative and useful video.
With Ford planning to add advertising into in car displays and the patent has already been passed, how does this apply to the distraction laws?
Absolutely perfect video thanks for your work bro well done.
18:47, Am I right in thinking that in the UK it’s not a legal requirement to need to have your driving license, Mot certificate or insurance details with you when driving. Definitely not a good idea to leave these documents in the car anyway in case it’s stolen.
It is a legal requirement to provide your licence, MOT cert and insurance cert when requested by a police officer. Failure to do so is an offence. But there is a statutory defence if you produce it to the required police station within 7 days. Long story short, as long as you turn up at a police station with it within 7 days, you're good.
Carrying it with you avoids having to fart around taking it to a police station, however.
I DONT CARRY MINE EITHER FOR THE SAME REASON ,AND TELL THE COP IF I DO GET PULLED TO GIVE ME A PRODUCER
@@boostar155a friend of mine carried his docs with him ,including V5,and had his car stolen,never recovered the car,they probably took it to a chop shop. as it was years ago that's why I don't carry docs in my car
I think that it should be a requirement to carry your licence every time you get in a vehicle. It might save a lot of time. But the police can check quickly if you are on their insurance database.
If there is something that I really don't like is people driving and using the phone at the same time and tailgating is so annoying and frustrating to me seeing this happening.
It's not a 350zee, it's a 350 Z.
I witnessed 3 South Yorkshire police motorcyclist in the afternoon of Wed 23rd Oct in lane three, south bound of the M1 at J36 going well above the 70 limit without lights & sirens. Rule for one & a rule for the others.
Thank you for the videos... I have a question. Was going down a 2 lane road, speed limit was 50Mph kept to the left lane with cruise control on... I saw a group of cars doing 40Mph so naturally went to the right lane and started passing all the cars with cruise control on. Noticed that all the cars were behind a police car, none of them would go past... since I had my cruise control on, I''ve gone past them, then joined back the left lane gettin in front of the police car. As soon as I did that the police car sped up and started following me really, really closely!!! I would consider dangerously close to me. Under 2 meters I would guess following distance. In case of an emergency they would have collided with me for sure... They did that for more than 1 mile. they just turned off after a while, but I would consider they put me and themselves in danger. What can I do in case it happens again??? It was quite stressful having a car following me from a really really dangerous distance. Never had any issues with police, no speeding tickets, ever and car is perfectly road legal. I was about to put my hazards on and pull over as it was dangerous. again... What can I do in case it happens again?
Hi can you guys make video about red light cameras how it works and when it gets activated
Also please make video about the speeding cameras as well how much allows you above the speed limit..?
Please
Ive been stopped 5 times when i was on a 125. Had the "vechile fits description of stolen vechile" and the "thats not a 125" which is just pathetic when i was doing less than 60 mph on the dualie i got pulled on. For them to them inspect the bike (tread depth, lights etc) LOOKING for things to get me done for after they found it was in fact a 125cc.
Appears to be a reasonable policeman. over here in Australia I lived in Melbourne, there was a time bogus police were pulling cars over. I always told my daughter to drive to a servo or police station.
Great video , could u ask Owen what he thinks about people driving under the speed limit , for instance driving a 30 in 60 etc..
When I did my test I would have been failed for that, a lot of crashes are because of young motorists in underpowered cars over taking slow drivers.
30 in a 60 is a bit dangerous. I often go 40 in a de restricted as dear can run out into the road and any other animals or people doing a dangerous overtake coming the other direction. Also on smart motorways I always go 10mph what they say sometimes even 15mph incase the signs changed what was displayed. Also a lot of people are trying to save fuel now.
That volvo YMO was out and about in the torbay area the other night, i thought we get newton abbot or exeter traffic guys here.
There was this police car with lights and sirens on in Swansea, lights and sirens turned off as he pulled into McDonald's