Sorry to be off topic but does any of you know of a method to get back into an instagram account? I somehow forgot the password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me.
@Maxton Johan I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site on google and im in the hacking process now. I see it takes a while so I will reply here later with my results.
Igor Glavasic the 34th is an underated Mozart symphony. It's got all the verve and joy of the more popular Symphony #35 "Haffner" and well as innovations which point the way to greater forthcoming works, such as the piano concerto K. 503 and the magnificent "Jupiter" symphony.
@@timothythorne9464 totally agree.. Haffner-Symphony in fact isn't even a symphony, it's a remake of a serenade. This one is probably a first late Mozart's symphony - at least the first movement
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart ( 27 January 1756- 5 December 1791 ) was Austrian composer of classical era, pianist and violinist. Mozart was born in Salzburg. When he was only 5, he started composing and when he was about 10 years old he composed his first symphony. With his father and sister Nanette, Amadeus was traveling to many European countries and playing to the kings. Mozart was big attraction when he played with closed eyes. Mozart's father Georg Leopold was a violinist and important composer of rococo style. Mozart's wrote more then 600 works. His most important compositions are symphonies, operas, serenades, sonatas, piano concertos, violin concertos horn concertos, choral works... Amadeus died in Vienna when he wrote his last work Requiem in d minor wich he didn't finish. His death is a big mystery but some people say that Mozart probably died becose he ate poisend meat. Mozart's son Franz Xsaver Wolfgang was composer of early romantic period.
You made 2 mistakes. Check your sources, please. He wrote his first symphony at the age of 7, not 10, there is a big difference, especially for a child. his food wasn't poisoned, but rather, there was an epidemic of some sort in his town.
Mihawk Drakule it's a pretty powerful and impressive symphony. All of Mozart's symphonic works, beginning with #19, are worthy additions, but the ones beginning with his marvellous Symphony #29 rival the best symphonies of any composer, including Beethoven. This symphony is as good as it gets!
@@timothythorne9464I think that comparing a chamber simphony like mozart’s 29 to the grand Beethoven’s ones is futile because are completely different works in scale and conception
@@lorenzocassani8169 Mozart's symphonies 38-41 are the Classical Period symphonies developed to their peak of perfection. Beethoven's 9 symphonies, are well, Beethoven (you can say "Romantic" if you wish; I won't). Both are opposite sides of the same coin: symphonic development at the top of its game.
The "new material" the description above refers to in respect of the first movement's development section is in part an allusion to Johann Christian Bach's g-minor symphony.
Thank you Bartje Bartmans; this is a great service to me and other musicians and music lovers. Have you listed the performers somewhere? That would be the only missing thing in my overall great gratitude for this work. Ahh, Mozart! So clear and simple, and how his music conjures up the most profound ideas and feelings in us!
Is this Mozart's autograph? Interesting that it has the violins on top and the winds are below, nowadays it's the other way round. By the way this is a good recording of this work.
Does anyone know why the instruments are scored not where they should be? (woodwinds in the upper side of the sheet, etc etc.) Were the rules different back the day? Or did they not even exist?
They are written down as was usual in those days. This was standard practice. It also depended on geography. Vienna had a different out-lay from Paris, the scores as we know them in our days gradually came about with the advent of romanticism. Beethoven already used modern scoring. Choral works, even in Mozart's days were written for specific clefs for each voice, difficult to read for us. I have seen scores where brass and timpani were in top lines, but also scores where strings were in top with woodwinds and basso continuo below. There are baroque scores where harpsichord is in between the strings with cello below and violins above. Sometimes scores were written down reflecting the outlay of the group on stage. Most of these scores were modified to modern scores, in Mozart's case that happened in 1800's
Excuse ne, I'm not all that good at differentiating the instruments of a classical orchestra so I would like someone to tell me if there's indeed only 2 violins and one Viola
In 1782, the permanent staff of the Mannheim Orchestra included 23 violins (12/11), 3 violas, 4 cellos, 3 double basses, 4 flutes, 3 oboes, 4 clarinets, 4 bassoons, 6 horns, and kettledrums. Around 1800, the string group had grown to 7 violas, 5 cellos and 7 double basses, and from here on the size of the string section was repeatedly extended.
Bartje Bartmans I heard a performance of Beethoven's "Eroica" symphony using period instruments, and the Classical-period orchestra you describe. It was marvellous, and I liked it better than more conventional, modern renderings like Bernstein and Bruno Walter.
This gem of a symphony is easily overlooked but it deserves to be far better known.
Sorry to be off topic but does any of you know of a method to get back into an instagram account?
I somehow forgot the password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me.
@Maxton Asher Instablaster ;)
@Maxton Johan I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site on google and im in the hacking process now.
I see it takes a while so I will reply here later with my results.
@Maxton Johan It worked and I finally got access to my account again. Im so happy!
Thank you so much you really help me out !
@Maxton Asher You are welcome :D
The finale is amazing. Underrated, and the best movement of this symphony. Wolfgang at his best.
Wonderful! One of my favorite Mozart's symphonys!
Igor Glavasic the 34th is an underated Mozart symphony. It's got all the verve and joy of the more popular Symphony #35 "Haffner" and well as innovations which point the way to greater forthcoming works, such as the piano concerto K. 503 and the magnificent "Jupiter" symphony.
@@timothythorne9464 ..underrated? By the idiots you mean...🤗
@@timothythorne9464 totally agree.. Haffner-Symphony in fact isn't even a symphony, it's a remake of a serenade. This one is probably a first late Mozart's symphony - at least the first movement
Our beloved Amadeus
Great performance of a wonderful symphony. Thanks for sharing.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
( 27 January 1756- 5 December 1791 )
was Austrian composer of classical era, pianist and violinist.
Mozart was born in Salzburg. When he was only 5, he started composing and when he was about 10 years old he composed his first symphony. With his father and sister Nanette, Amadeus was traveling to many European countries and playing to the kings. Mozart was big attraction when he played with closed eyes.
Mozart's father Georg Leopold was a violinist and important composer of rococo style.
Mozart's wrote more then 600 works. His most important compositions are symphonies, operas, serenades, sonatas, piano concertos, violin concertos horn concertos, choral works...
Amadeus died in Vienna when he wrote his last work Requiem in d minor wich he didn't finish. His death is a big mystery but some people say that Mozart probably died becose he ate poisend meat.
Mozart's son Franz Xsaver Wolfgang was composer of early romantic period.
You made 2 mistakes. Check your sources, please.
He wrote his first symphony at the age of 7, not 10, there is a big difference, especially for a child. his food wasn't poisoned, but rather, there was an epidemic of some sort in his town.
Mijn favoriete symfonie van Mozart! En dan ook nog met manuscript. Heel erg bedankt!
00:00 I. Allegro Vivace
06:58 II. Andante di molto
14:25 III. Finale: Allegro vivace
I like the finale😊😮😊😮
Amazing! Thats my new favourite piece now
The previous one was concerto 24 lol
Mihawk Drakule it's a pretty powerful and impressive symphony.
All of Mozart's symphonic works, beginning with #19, are worthy additions, but the ones beginning with his marvellous Symphony #29 rival the best symphonies of any composer, including Beethoven. This symphony is as good as it gets!
@@timothythorne9464I think that comparing a chamber simphony like mozart’s 29 to the grand Beethoven’s ones is futile because are completely different works in scale and conception
@@lorenzocassani8169 Mozart's symphonies 38-41 are the Classical Period symphonies developed to their peak of perfection. Beethoven's 9 symphonies, are well, Beethoven (you can say "Romantic" if you wish; I won't). Both are opposite sides of the same coin: symphonic development at the top of its game.
@@timothythorne9464 I cant agree more
BEAUTIFUL
Escutei ao longo dos anos diversas interpretações. Essa é especial, em destaque a dinâmica.
The "new material" the description above refers to in respect of the first movement's development section is in part an allusion to Johann Christian Bach's g-minor symphony.
Thank you Bartje Bartmans; this is a great service to me and other musicians and music lovers. Have you listed the performers somewhere? That would be the only missing thing in my overall great gratitude for this work.
Ahh, Mozart! So clear and simple, and how his music conjures up the most profound ideas and feelings in us!
If you click on the tab "show more" you will see the info. London Mozart Players conducted by Matthias Bamert
Is this Mozart's autograph? Interesting that it has the violins on top and the winds are below, nowadays it's the other way round. By the way this is a good recording of this work.
Common practice. Manuscript, autograph or copyists's scores are the closest we can get to the composer's times and mindset.
Lovely.
Gracias y saludos cordiales desde Mallorca para ti también bartje bartmamm
Imagine being the guy at the library that went through and put those stamps in the middle of these pages like it's just another random thing to stamp.
Misschien wel mijn favoriete symfonie van Mozart. Vlot-traag-vlot als in de italiaanse sinfonia, maar toch typisch Mozartiaans.
Does anyone know why the instruments are scored not where they should be? (woodwinds in the upper side of the sheet, etc etc.)
Were the rules different back the day? Or did they not even exist?
They are written down as was usual in those days. This was standard practice. It also depended on geography. Vienna had a different out-lay from Paris, the scores as we know them in our days gradually came about with the advent of romanticism. Beethoven already used modern scoring. Choral works, even in Mozart's days were written for specific clefs for each voice, difficult to read for us. I have seen scores where brass and timpani were in top lines, but also scores where strings were in top with woodwinds and basso continuo below. There are baroque scores where harpsichord is in between the strings with cello below and violins above. Sometimes scores were written down reflecting the outlay of the group on stage. Most of these scores were modified to modern scores, in Mozart's case that happened in 1800's
@@bartjebartmans oh, I see!
Thank you verryyy much for this awesome detailed explanation, I really appreciate it!
Middle movement reminds me of Haydn in the middle (even though the main theme is pure Mozart).
Cool
😊
Well, we have just discovered were Beethoven find the inspiration for his first string trio
L opus 3 ?
Excuse ne, I'm not all that good at differentiating the instruments of a classical orchestra so I would like someone to tell me if there's indeed only 2 violins and one Viola
In 1782, the permanent staff of the Mannheim Orchestra included 23 violins (12/11), 3 violas, 4 cellos, 3 double basses, 4 flutes, 3 oboes, 4 clarinets, 4 bassoons, 6 horns, and kettledrums. Around 1800, the string group had grown to 7 violas, 5 cellos and 7 double basses, and from here on the size of the string section was repeatedly extended.
Bartje Bartmans I heard a performance of Beethoven's "Eroica" symphony using period instruments, and the Classical-period orchestra you describe. It was marvellous, and I liked it better than more conventional, modern renderings like Bernstein and Bruno Walter.
6:53 not good enough??
1:18