HHHHHHHH GO HEAD warring them you can't asshole because we PLAY LIVE + it's 50/50 profit for long term and i you lucky in short term this man showing Martingale System witch is known global y to play safe in the last for who have low bank roll
When a person is playing at a casino he/she must understand that what ever money that was bet is already a lost, that is why there is such thing as "stop loss". The Martingale Betting System is only effective if you pair it with a game strategy (a strategy to whatever game you're playing) and if you win just win enough, don't get greedy. If there is a "stop loss" there is also a "stop win". Set these goals/mindset and you will be fine.
The standard Martingale strategy is mathematically impractical. As you said in this video. People don't realize how often black or red will hit 8-10 or more times in a row. If you're playing on a regular basis it's guaranteed to eventually happen. You lose all of your wins & leave the casino broke. The reverse Martingale makes more sense. And here we have a modified version of that.
how ever note the same applys. bitting up means you loss more when you loss and betting down after a loss means next to nothing. its the losss at the end that gets um
Okay but you are eating all those loses until you finally win, so if you lost alot or even lets say two columns (games) reach 180 then you are already 554$ down in just those two alone, then youre screwed because your bankroll is gone. Youre risking not having enough to cover all these games at once. Its hard enough to cover one martingale game. Am i wrong?
I have trouble seeing why and how the bet sequence is weighted. 5-12-25-55-100-180-350-660-1350-2700. Why 55 and not 50, aiming for a higher $13 profit instead of $5? The $180 bet is even a losing one with -$17. And then the bet sequence deteriorate even further the deeper we get. The $660 bet loses -$67. It doesn't make sense.
I believe the idea behind 55 not 50 is to give you a chance not to be chasing 5 if you win but also ensure that all the times you had lost you still get to win. Remember that when playing the martingale strategy when you loose and continue doubling at the end if you win you will only be winning the initial amount not the profit for each time you have place a bet. I have modified this even further as follows: 5-15-35-75-155-315-635-1275- 2555 where if you probably you win at 315 you;ll not be winning 5 but 30 to cover for all the spins where you had lost ensuring you always have a win.. His progression makes it possible to always have a win per spin not just chasing the initial losing amount.
So tried this over 50 hands of BJ. Started with 1000 start bet at 5. After 50 Hands of using this system total £937.50 -£62.50. Then 50 hands of normal martingale same betting. 50 hands. Finished £1070. £70 up.
I was almost exiting this video at the start because I have never imagined any better way of improving the martingale technique but something in me told me to just watch to the end. This is one unique strategy that am going to try out. I really love it. Its a spread your bad luck martingale strategy.
Very interesting way to bet place---especially in Baccarat. What great is that when you hit a win streak of 7 or 8 hands in a row--you convert all the columns from L to W--and all the Marty's go back at level 1 on that moderate win streak. On the flip side--as was said in the Video--a long losing streak doesn't wipe you out in 10 hands--and you've still got a decent chance to get your losses back as the game progresses and get out with a profit.
The column that keeps losing has higher and higher values accumulating at the bottom. So you win peanuts in the other columns, while the losing column will eat a whole chunk out of the profits. So no matter what the strategy, eventually the losses will be equal to, if not more than the profits. Guys, there is no strategy that can give you an edge over the 50-50 fair coin. Not even this one. Try this one out on a sheet of paper. At the end, add up all the profits & losses. You will find that the value of the profits will be equal to the value of the losses. Thank me later ;)
This is just a better version of martingalesystem. There is no System what can give you a 100% Chance to win all the Time. This version is actually interesting to use, because it minimizes the risk to double up into a bankrupt when you are getting into a long losingstreaks
Scotty , this is older video but I've been modifying and tinkering with this strategy a lot thanks!.. I basically each day have 5 columns and set the max at each column to 3. At the End of the Day I take whataver profit I get, or if it is a loss I let it be. Then start over the next day. So far overall up..
Great video Scotty. Good plan. Sound advice. Have an idea. Instead of eliminating a column that gets to 6 losses from 10, why not set a stop loss limit of say 3. The reasoning is that eliminating a column of 6 losses totals 1,387. Divide that by 5 means you have to win 278 bets to recover your loss. Much easier to recover a loss of 42 ( 5+12+25) divided by 5 = approx 8 wins required. Yes, you'll get to 3 losses more often, but if those 6 losses had been 2x3 losses, then you'd only need to win 16 times to recover. What you could do instead of writing up a Martindale column of 5 to 2,700. You could write up a Mini-Martindale column of 5 12 25. 5 12 25. 5 12 25, etc. No need to eliminate columns. Just make them longer in multiples of 3. What are your thoughts, Scotty?
So essentially you are playing 5 collums with 5 sets of buy ins. You are just delaying the inevitable of making that 5,6,7 martingale bets. Now you can set a limit and not bet beyond five losses which will save you from the huge bets. If I come in with 5 sets of buys in of course I will not be afraid to bet infact I would bet it to the 10 hands knowing I have 4 more buy ins to play with.
Can you please remake this video so I can understand it more clear. I really don't understand what your doing. Maybe play another game where there are no pushes and you can bet the actual amount your saying. I'd really appreciate it
at 5:14, you said that with Martingale, "in order to win, you bet more when you are winning, and then bet the minimum amount when you are losing"... did you just mis-speak on that? I always thought it was to double bet on losses, and go back to minimum after a win.
I had similar results using 5 columns. Ran 30 to 957 then started hitting many big losses down to zero. I was using stops at +3 units and stop after a 6th level loss.
Nice video, thanks. I am also testing Martingale variations but applied to trading where I risk 1 to win 2, which allows me to "place more trades" sort of speak, plus I trade trends so that I can have an edge instead of relying just in luck.
Just wanted to let you know I like the graft system, but you must recalculate your progression bets, ultimately your loss bet increase still leaves you behind.
Scotty, Thank you for taking the time to do this video, it is very interesting, I subscribed. My only question is have you considered somehow modifying it to roll over the win columns? Pressing the wins up to column 2 or 3, then resetting? Thanks again
I have done some testing of this with 30 columns. This makes it a lot less chance of getting in too deep. Spin 132 I was up 100 units and highest bet 31 units on 2 only. I continued progression from that point and by spin 317 was up 251 units and highest was 63 units on 2 spins. I used Super Martingale 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63 . So I think more colums to a certain point the better. One down side to use with live game you would not only have to track bets, but profits. Would work best with online. Perhaps to use a profit point to restart. 10 or 20 units maybe.
Something i noticed when using this strategy especially on online casino's they start targeting you and whenever you increase the bet on loosing column and ends up as the normal martingale. I noticed situations where one of the columns starts to grow and whenever you get to the column its always a loss irrespective of how you place your bet. I guess this would be suitable when playing in a house casino not online.
Nice, it looks fun to play too, I am definitely going to experiment with this next time I play, tomorrow. I just play regular martingale for blackjack at home for no money, just do simulated casino sessions. It surprises me how rarely I get into trouble. I suppose there are other things that can throw a wrench into it in a real casino situation. I am someone with a lot of balls, so I don't think that would be a problem for me, but I can imagine when you hit the table limit and you want to switch tables or even casinos to carry on and bet even higher amounts to try and win your previous bets back that it could just throw you off. Going to a new table, maybe you'd start on a deck maybe where you are going to draw a series of hands that are even worse than at the previous table and you're starting at 3000 dollars. You have to pay a lot to buy into those kinds of games I would imagine also. But to be honest, I'm dubious and suspicious of how vehement and how many people there are online yelling at you about how stupid Martingaling is. It makes me wonder if they aren't shills and Martingale is not that bad and maybe the casinos don't want too many people playing it. Of course you are betting a lot to win a little, but that just has to be accepted, as nonsesnsical as it may be, or if you don't accept it then don't play Martingale strategy. Or yes, of course you can lose ten in a row, well you need to have a large bankroll. if you don't have that, you should maybe card count or something. I've never played blackjack at a casino, i would imagine they would not take kindly to using a pencil and paper to keep track of your Martingale columns, so it seems this is only for online betting, which I have a hard time trusting, it just seems too easy to simulate the cards and if a player starts winning they just could give him bad hands using a computer program that generates what looks like cards in an actual live beetting casino but which are only animations.
Hi there, finally i got how this work thanks a lot, but i do have a question. When to quit playing? For example on normal martingale, if you win you can reset the bet or stop, but when to stop on this martingale 2.0? I mean i have 5 Colums , how to end it?
Hang on. Every column is unique. So you're just as likely to see a 10 losing streak on any of them, irrespective of if you're betting other hands on other columns. This doesn't change the risk of ruin at all. It's multiplying if anything as you could see two columns get to 10 losses at the same time, then you're twice as fucked. Unless I've missed something
I agree you are right. My thought process is that by playing many games at once, you can artificially inflate your bankroll to buy you more double down rounds than you could afford to play from your original bankroll. Plus, the fact that losing in the first few rounds of double (#2-4) even across many instances puts you in a smaller hole than being in the higher double rounds (#6-10) on even only a couple instances. This might buy you playing time for your many successes to build up your bankroll in time for you to face the instances that have digressed to the higher double rounds? I still don't know if this is actually valid in the long run... I'm thinking not. But I suspect it prolongs your play time. Perhaps modifying the strategy to somehow scale up your betting once a certain bankroll level has been achieved... (building off that - perhaps returning to the higher double up instances that you left behind only once your bankroll has been scaled high enough to make the risk worth it.) I'm no mathematician so these are all guesses.
hey, i tested this, i played at a local casino while playing BJ. my gf kept score on her phone, i used a 15 bar version and instead of eliminating columns when i reach 80 euros, i just keep playing 80 until i win, instead of going up to 160. it worked and we made 300 euros profit. i tested it on my phone many times and it seems there is some kind of statistical advantage.
@@vincentang6695 either bank roll 300 - 5,10,20,40 or 500 - 10,20,40,80. Most of the money is made when you double down or split. Sometimes this system just keeps me in the same place. But I rarely lose more than I'm making. When the 40s stack up too much I prefer to start a fresh start
@@vincentang6695 you're welcome, I should increase increments like he said I'm the video to speed up the process. I have only been testing for a few days. I managed to make a few hundreds with this method though. It's important that you stop and take frequent breaks if you see profit and start over later. As it can become exhausting
Ok so what if you have a column that keeps losing instead of eliminating it take those losses and put them in the other columns so now instead of betting $5 in columns 1 2 4 or whatever you're betting $12 in those columns
Martingale won't work in anything that has an edge against you. Let's say it's roulette and the edge is an even 5% and your first bet on red is 1$. The series would be 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 32. By the time it's $32 you're still only going to make $1profit if you win, if there was no edge, but because there IS a 5% house edge, what's 5% of $32? It's $1.60. In the long term, every time you bet $32 to make $1 you're also losing $1.60 to the house, so even though you win you really lose 60 cents. The $32 bet just shows the most clearly how the house edge will beat you long term, but it will beat you even on the lower bets, just not as dramatically, more grindingly. What's really happening is that it's the same as flat betting the average of your long term martingale bets. It would average out to about $3 per bet so it's the same as flat betting $3 and you losing 15 cents every time. It's the same if you increase by lower amounts than double, it's still the average of whatever the series is. The only way you can ever win in a casino is if you hit a jackpot in slots early on and then never go to the casino again.
I suppose if the price levels were wide enough that the spread/commissions were a very small percentage of the average return per series. Exchanges are just way too greedy for most systems to be profitable.@@quintonnkoane9885
Interesting, but 1 month is still a relatively short test. Somebody would have noticed if Martingale worked in blackjack before you did by now wouldn't they? I'll try it in a demo though, thanks for mentioning it.@@slideman1249
First time trying this on roulette and it has gone horribly, unfortunately. Every large bet I did seemed to lose, so I ended up with lots of small wins but lots of big losses. I guess that's just the luck of the draw. I may tweak things and try again but just wanted to let everyone know that this isn't foolproof. It's still very easy to lose your money with this strategy.
Interesting system, but you need to adjust your bets. At the 180 level and above you are actually losing money on your win. the 180 doesn't cover the 197 you bet previously in that column. at the 350 level you would have bet 377 in that column.
Thank you for the time you put into this. SO... Basically, you are Martingale-ing 5 instances (sessions), but instead of consecutive bets, it ends up being every 5th bet (or however number or sessions you run, which could still lose, but less likely? I Like it. I still need a stop loss (which another series can make up) and a stop win to feel comfortable. Thanks again
I used this strategy at the casino on the big 20 money wheel that the 5 pays 5 to 1 before I knew it was illegal in the casino. It worked for me like 10 times in a row when I went to Atlantic City. There was one time I hit the table limit so I left because it wouldn’t work at that point. The stock market doesn’t have limits or laws against it so as long as you have enough capital, it won’t fail.
@@infraredxray This is not that hard if you use indicators, for example if the RSI is below some extreme condition like 10, more often than not you will win 80% of the time on a bet after that with a typical stop loss and take profit. This situation is very rare but it does happen. You could then in theory find other indicators with extremely rare situations and start to stack those together to get more opportunities and then probably use something like this well.
Trade Hedging 1.1, even when you lose, you win . It's better to break even then taking a lost. I don't care what direction the market goes. I cut my losses and keep add to my wins. 😮 trading the trending direction this is not roulette
@@josephastrahan6403 Would incorporating missed rounds into the modified strategy-where certain rounds are skipped-have any impact on improving the chances of winning?
I would like to use this strategy for BlackJack but have one question. If I double down on my bet and lose, should I mark two losses on the same chart? I use basic strategy wich calls for alot of double downs and splits.
would it be smart to add a lost to all the winning columns and subtract it from the 660 so you can slowly clear the drawdown, instead of leaving it as a lost. You'll stop playing the 3rd column but you'll let the other 4 help reduce the lost over time. Overall great strategy.
Can i ask where you got your multiples from? Its not doubled or trippled, it seems randome that you chose 5-12-25-55-etc.? Thats the last thing i need to figure out before i can list out my own games and try it myself.
Yea I asked that myself because from 100 to 180 you would make minus even if you won the 180 bet -> you spend 197 before reaching the point of betting 180. that doesn’t make sense to me..
The odds of winning 20 times in a row on even money bets with a 2.7% VIG is 625,124 to one. RIDICULOUS! Just try to win a couple in a row over and over again.
I've been making every strat into Marti(hollandish to Marti,Oscars grind to marti etc.) and found this awesome technique and now I have to drop everything and try this one ,thanks much Scotty I'ma name this "GS KAGEBUNSHIN" means grand scotty shadow clones
Doesn't actually do anything. All you are doing is obscuring your losses with a bunch of random betting rules. You have the same odds of winning or losing with every new hand so how much you bet and when makes no difference.
Im so confused on your chart?? I dont get the logic here. Idk if its bc Im not familiar with the game youre playing. So, when and how are you updating your chart?
So, after 5 wins (or 7, however many columns you have) you move on to the next higher bet? Or you just martingale on lets say for example the 4th bet until you reach another win? At 17:35 you finally take a loss, then you start your chart back over on the 1st column? I dont know when you move on to the next higher bet. At 19:10 you take another couple losses but then you start at the 5th column? I really wish I understood... lol. I want to try this on baccarat but need some more guidance
I just found this and I'm glad I did. I'm testing it out on baccarat and so far it's working great. I'm using a five step Grand Martingale (1 - 3 - 7 - 15 - 31) and if I bust out (which hasn't happened yet) I drop the column and replace it with a new one. I play until I hit my win target. Thanks!
Very interesting. 250 spins in euro roulette and up 230 units using 1-3-7-…grand M. Have had to make the 63 unit bet six times and the 127 twice. Seems to put it up to random luck. I like the idea of not making the 127 bet and spreading it to make back the 121 loss. Any strategy is best used when you set a profit target and a stop loss. Looking forward to testing it to 10,000 spins and see what happens. Thanks for this innovative twist!
Scotty I believe you may have the closest thing I have seen to a winning system. Sufficient bank roll, nerves of steel and intestinal fortitude to match, this could almost not fail. A cent online game and $20 or so would be way to try. Also if you got in a little, amount could be split into 10 columns next round. A progression of 1, 2, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63 may work. Also if at any point you break even or up 1 or more units, restart. Thank you for your ideas. Certainly thinking outside the box.
A WINNING SYSTEM IS NOT A PROGRESSIVE STRATEGY ONLY IT MUST BE PAIRED WITH KNOWLEDGE OR IT WILL FAIL. YOU MUST KNOW WHERE TO PLACE YOUR WAGER AND WHEN TO DO SO ALSO, YOU CAN NOT PLACE YOUR BET BLINDLY ON RED OR BLACK AND EXPECT THIS MATHEMATICAL SYSTEM TO SAVE YOU, CAUSE IN CANNOT,
@@scottybear hello what did The Baccologist say? I think he deleted his comment. I really want to know please. Maybe i cld use it to improve your strat. Ty!
@@scottybear sir can you tell me which sport should i choose to Bet using this martingale strategy? is USA football good option than Soccer? i find normal SOCCER hard bcoz there are 50 chances of Match Draw... Need your Genuine Advice on this 🙏🙏🙏
@@scottybear No, "near" is not enough. You still need a player advantage to beat the Casino. Betting progressions itself cannot overcome House advantage, no matter how constructive they are. (You should know that as a former Casino Dealer).
Hey Scotty, Bear, thank you for sharing this cool strategy. In one session how much are you looking to make? Say on a bankroll of $3000 with a $10 limit, what is your goal before you walk away?
If you bet martingale you must win enough to overcome the big loss when it happens. Do you know how many wins it takes to overcome the big loss? But if you can’t win that much then why not do opposite in the double if you win in the same manner? Why is it you lose more than a successful win through the system? So you end up losing more than you win doing it both ways. The house edge kicks in when you actually realize this. With that being said everyone will need to bet in a way they are convinced will help them. It’s always a system of betting.
Way too many pushes, this game is stupid. Bacarat seems better for this? Interesting stuff though what's preventing a particular column from losing like 10 in a row? Just betting bankers and doubling your bet every loss has the same chance as using multiple columns. Meaning usually you win, but get wiped out if you play long enough. No reason you'd have a better chance of not losing 7+ in a row with 1 column or multiple. I will test this out see how it goes
This strategy is absolute nonsene. You play like 10 Martingale players. And you will losse like 10 Martingale players. When you eliminate a column (because of loosing too often) it has actually accumluated 100s of dollars lost, while you only win a liite over 5 $ for each other column winning.
That's what I play, but there is a different martingale strategy... if you lose 2 in a row (both under 2x) you sit out and don't bet again until you see >2.0, then continue your progression. If you win you go back to betting 1 unit. E.g. Bet 1, lose. Bet 2 units, lose again... sit out until the next >2.0, then bet 4 units, then 8 units... then sit out again. Until you get a win, then go back to 1 unit. My first 4 bets are martingale, then fibonacci for 5th and 6th bets (add previous 2 bets). 5th or 6th win, go back to 3rd or 4th. If i lose 6 I'm out, start over. Won't go broke at least. I've found it works reasonably well, you can avoid those long streaks of under 2.0x.. since you sit out after 2 in a row. But once in a while you can lose all 6.
@@tqsuited How many bets you must win in a day to collect your stop loss? For example if you're willing to risk $1000, how many bets you have to win to collect the money you're risking?
I lasted about 45 minutes playing baccarat using this guys system…And I had a deep bankroll…Now I have nothing….Absolutely nothing!!! OMG, I have never been this devastated by a system! It was 45 minutes of pure torture. I would have felt better if I just lit my money on fire with a blow torch. It would have saved me from this 45 minutes of pure hell on wheels! OMFG!!!!! WTF!!!!!!! What the hell man!
Excellent video. I'm going to try this out with Binary Options for Forex. In that case it is actually possible to gain an edge by trading currency pairs that are trending and only taking trades in the direction of the dominant trend. Also with trading you can set daily profit and loss targets so for example if I'm down $500 on a red day I call it quits but maybe my winning days are $1000. So even if there are a few bad days here and there over time with an edge it should be profitable.
@@jonathanfigueroa2892 Kind of. It definitely keeps you going longer but I had the feeling that I was just drawing out the inevitable. It still has the same pitfalls as the regular martingale strategy where you end up getting unlucky in one particular column and getting blown up. I was using it on a shorter timeframe (30 second) chart to test it rapidly but your edge as a trader there is almost nonexistant because you're getting stopped out by market noise. It's basically a coinflip and we know what can happen with those. I'd like to try it again on a longer timeframe, like the 5min chart and see how it does.
@@jonathanfigueroa2892 You're welcome to try as well. It's easy to start. I use a service called PocketOption. They have a phone app as well as a website and they have a free demo account. It's fun to mess around with.
Do u think that the most likely place to run this system successfully is the roulette, choosing or always red or always black? Because it is 50/50 stake (if u don’t count with the green) and the most losses u have, most likely it will be to get a win in the next one, and for that reason that should prevent us to enter a massive losing streak. Greetings from Portugal
I play a similar betting progression which allows me around 19 chances to recoup my losses with the martingale. with this system, you are playing if you get a loss every fifth spin will kill your bankroll, like spin #1,6,11,16,21,26,31, etc. or 2,7,12,17,22,27,32, etc. so be mindful of that in the example above., so the key here is to know where to place your bet and why you must know the why or you are simply guessing.
Sir please delete this video I worry casino bane this stategy.. 100% profit this way..
HHHHHHHH GO HEAD warring them you can't asshole because we PLAY LIVE + it's 50/50 profit for long term and i you lucky in short term this man showing Martingale System witch is known global y to play safe in the last for who have low bank roll
😂😂😂😂😂
LOL first prove that this system wins consistently, then ask to delete it. Have you been winning with it?
Brother please 🙏🏻 replay me , it is working???
😂
Never liked anyones video on youtube except this one. Its been working for me ever since i found it. i win and walk everytime..
:) nice!
When a person is playing at a casino he/she must understand that what ever money that was bet is already a lost, that is why there is such thing as "stop loss". The Martingale Betting System is only effective if you pair it with a game strategy (a strategy to whatever game you're playing) and if you win just win enough, don't get greedy. If there is a "stop loss" there is also a "stop win". Set these goals/mindset and you will be fine.
The only person that I have seen with this wisdom. Thank you.. Why is it that hard?
The standard Martingale strategy is mathematically impractical. As you said in this video. People don't realize how often black or red will hit 8-10 or more times in a row. If you're playing on a regular basis it's guaranteed to eventually happen. You lose all of your wins & leave the casino broke. The reverse Martingale makes more sense. And here we have a modified version of that.
how ever note the same applys. bitting up means you loss more when you loss and betting down after a loss means next to nothing. its the losss at the end that gets um
Why in the hell did you pick a game with so many damned pushes? You could flipped a coin to make your case.
Okay but you are eating all those loses until you finally win, so if you lost alot or even lets say two columns (games) reach 180 then you are already 554$ down in just those two alone, then youre screwed because your bankroll is gone. Youre risking not having enough to cover all these games at once. Its hard enough to cover one martingale game. Am i wrong?
31:00 a $180 win does not clear all the losses in that column. Why not bet an amount large enough to break even or profit ? Eg 200+
I have trouble seeing why and how the bet sequence is weighted. 5-12-25-55-100-180-350-660-1350-2700. Why 55 and not 50, aiming for a higher $13 profit instead of $5? The $180 bet is even a losing one with -$17. And then the bet sequence deteriorate even further the deeper we get. The $660 bet loses -$67. It doesn't make sense.
I believe the idea behind 55 not 50 is to give you a chance not to be chasing 5 if you win but also ensure that all the times you had lost you still get to win. Remember that when playing the martingale strategy when you loose and continue doubling at the end if you win you will only be winning the initial amount not the profit for each time you have place a bet. I have modified this even further as follows: 5-15-35-75-155-315-635-1275- 2555 where if you probably you win at 315 you;ll not be winning 5 but 30 to cover for all the spins where you had lost ensuring you always have a win.. His progression makes it possible to always have a win per spin not just chasing the initial losing amount.
So tried this over 50 hands of BJ. Started with 1000 start bet at 5. After 50 Hands of using this system total £937.50 -£62.50. Then 50 hands of normal martingale same betting. 50 hands. Finished £1070. £70 up.
I came up with another improvement on your strategy. Thanks for the idea
Nice!!!
I was almost exiting this video at the start because I have never imagined any better way of improving the martingale technique but something in me told me to just watch to the end. This is one unique strategy that am going to try out. I really love it. Its a spread your bad luck martingale strategy.
Thank you dude!!
Very interesting way to bet place---especially in Baccarat. What great is that when you hit a win streak of 7 or 8 hands in a row--you convert all the columns from L to W--and all the Marty's go back at level 1 on that moderate win streak. On the flip side--as was said in the Video--a long losing streak doesn't wipe you out in 10 hands--and you've still got a decent chance to get your losses back as the game progresses and get out with a profit.
The column that keeps losing has higher and higher values accumulating at the bottom. So you win peanuts in the other columns, while the losing column will eat a whole chunk out of the profits. So no matter what the strategy, eventually the losses will be equal to, if not more than the profits. Guys, there is no strategy that can give you an edge over the 50-50 fair coin. Not even this one. Try this one out on a sheet of paper. At the end, add up all the profits & losses. You will find that the value of the profits will be equal to the value of the losses. Thank me later ;)
Agreed. I tried this and still went bankrupt because of the losing column.
@@throwaway4928 how many columns did u use
@@obouldakos 5
those folks who think they invented a strategy would gain so much from doing a bit of maths.
This is just a better version of martingalesystem. There is no System what can give you a 100% Chance to win all the Time. This version is actually interesting to use, because it minimizes the risk to double up into a bankrupt when you are getting into a long losingstreaks
Scotty , this is older video but I've been modifying and tinkering with this strategy a lot thanks!.. I basically each day have 5 columns and set the max at each column to 3. At the End of the Day I take whataver profit I get, or if it is a loss I let it be. Then start over the next day. So far overall up..
Nice!
Can I ask what game you are playing and for tips to keep track??
@@titoman0650 paper and pencil
@@titoman0650 Stack 1s
This is one of the best modifications I’ve seen 👍🏻
thank you!
Great video Scotty. Good plan. Sound advice. Have an idea. Instead of eliminating a column that gets to 6 losses from 10, why not set a stop loss limit of say 3. The reasoning is that eliminating a column of 6 losses totals 1,387. Divide that by 5 means you have to win 278 bets to recover your loss. Much easier to recover a loss of 42 ( 5+12+25) divided by 5 = approx 8 wins required. Yes, you'll get to 3 losses more often, but if those 6 losses had been 2x3 losses, then you'd only need to win 16 times to recover.
What you could do instead of writing up a Martindale column of 5 to 2,700. You could write up a Mini-Martindale column of 5 12 25. 5 12 25. 5 12 25, etc. No need to eliminate columns. Just make them longer in multiples of 3.
What are your thoughts, Scotty?
Makes a lot of sense 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
So essentially you are playing 5 collums with 5 sets of buy ins. You are just delaying the inevitable of making that 5,6,7 martingale bets. Now you can set a limit and not bet beyond five losses which will save you from the huge bets. If I come in with 5 sets of buys in of course I will not be afraid to bet infact I would bet it to the 10 hands knowing I have 4 more buy ins to play with.
Can you please remake this video so I can understand it more clear. I really don't understand what your doing. Maybe play another game where there are no pushes and you can bet the actual amount your saying. I'd really appreciate it
When you say 650$ you’re not taking into account the other 650$ you had to put in to get there too and what if there’s 2-3 collums that run up
Don’t understand
at 5:14, you said that with Martingale, "in order to win, you bet more when you are winning, and then bet the minimum amount when you are losing"... did you just mis-speak on that? I always thought it was to double bet on losses, and go back to minimum after a win.
yes I made some mistakes in the video, but I felt like it was still good enough to publish
Reverse martingale
Do you have a 1 page simple scorecard for this made up to play 70-80 hands in a shoe
?
no sorry I dont
i ran up $70 to $1200 in like 15 hours of play. Then lost 13 hands in a row and lost everything. Betting $1 hands martingale system
Hard to beat a streak of 13 straight losses
I had similar results using 5 columns. Ran 30 to 957 then started hitting many big losses down to zero. I was using stops at +3 units and stop after a 6th level loss.
Thats nuts! 😆 After 15 hours up $1200 you should have left, but got greedy. Probably sleepwalked it away 😴
Nice video, thanks.
I am also testing Martingale variations but applied to trading where I risk 1 to win 2, which allows me to "place more trades" sort of speak, plus I trade trends so that I can have an edge instead of relying just in luck.
Trends are good.
Dude I do the exact same thing 😂
Would incorporating missed rounds into the modified strategy-where certain rounds are skipped-have any impact on improving the chances of winning?
Do you have sample on this that is much easier to learn? I mean much more basic.
I have this: ruclips.net/video/Jic9ww_5aL8/видео.html
@@scottybear alright thanks!
@@GamersUnityPH No Prob!
Just wanted to let you know I like the graft system, but you must recalculate your progression bets, ultimately your loss bet increase still leaves you behind.
Scotty, Thank you for taking the time to do this video, it is very interesting, I subscribed. My only question is have you considered somehow modifying it to roll over the win columns? Pressing the wins up to column 2 or 3, then resetting? Thanks again
it's an interesting angle forsure.
This actually works...i done a 7 colume stragety on baccarat.....works well man....well done...i subscribed because its awesome
Thank you dude!
What's your stop loss?
And how many wins do you need at least to collect your stop loss?
I have done some testing of this with 30 columns. This makes it a lot less chance of getting in too deep. Spin 132 I was up 100 units and highest bet 31 units on 2 only. I continued progression from that point and by spin 317 was up 251 units and highest was 63 units on 2 spins. I used Super Martingale 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63 . So I think more colums to a certain point the better. One down side to use with live game you would not only have to track bets, but profits. Would work best with online. Perhaps to use a profit point to restart. 10 or 20 units maybe.
wow that's interesting! thanks
Hello! Do you continue using the strategy? How is it working? Thank you! @johnblyth9787
Anyone who gambles online gets EXACTLY what he or she deserves.
Very very ..very interesting 🤔🤔🤑🤑
Something i noticed when using this strategy especially on online casino's they start targeting you and whenever you increase the bet on loosing column and ends up as the normal martingale. I noticed situations where one of the columns starts to grow and whenever you get to the column its always a loss irrespective of how you place your bet.
I guess this would be suitable when playing in a house casino not online.
yep most online casinos have algorithms that track your betting patterns. Ive found some that seem legit like Stake
Nice, it looks fun to play too, I am definitely going to experiment with this next time I play, tomorrow. I just play regular martingale for blackjack at home for no money, just do simulated casino sessions. It surprises me how rarely I get into trouble. I suppose there are other things that can throw a wrench into it in a real casino situation. I am someone with a lot of balls, so I don't think that would be a problem for me, but I can imagine when you hit the table limit and you want to switch tables or even casinos to carry on and bet even higher amounts to try and win your previous bets back that it could just throw you off. Going to a new table, maybe you'd start on a deck maybe where you are going to draw a series of hands that are even worse than at the previous table and you're starting at 3000 dollars. You have to pay a lot to buy into those kinds of games I would imagine also.
But to be honest, I'm dubious and suspicious of how vehement and how many people there are online yelling at you about how stupid Martingaling is. It makes me wonder if they aren't shills and Martingale is not that bad and maybe the casinos don't want too many people playing it. Of course you are betting a lot to win a little, but that just has to be accepted, as nonsesnsical as it may be, or if you don't accept it then don't play Martingale strategy. Or yes, of course you can lose ten in a row, well you need to have a large bankroll. if you don't have that, you should maybe card count or something.
I've never played blackjack at a casino, i would imagine they would not take kindly to using a pencil and paper to keep track of your Martingale columns, so it seems this is only for online betting, which I have a hard time trusting, it just seems too easy to simulate the cards and if a player starts winning they just could give him bad hands using a computer program that generates what looks like cards in an actual live beetting casino but which are only animations.
Any progress?
Hi there, finally i got how this work thanks a lot, but i do have a question. When to quit playing? For example on normal martingale, if you win you can reset the bet or stop, but when to stop on this martingale 2.0? I mean i have 5 Colums , how to end it?
you just keep going, pick up where you left off when your next session resumes.
@@scottybear oh that makes sense! Thanks!!!
@@GamersUnityPH no prob dude, good luck
Hang on. Every column is unique. So you're just as likely to see a 10 losing streak on any of them, irrespective of if you're betting other hands on other columns. This doesn't change the risk of ruin at all. It's multiplying if anything as you could see two columns get to 10 losses at the same time, then you're twice as fucked.
Unless I've missed something
I agree you are right. My thought process is that by playing many games at once, you can artificially inflate your bankroll to buy you more double down rounds than you could afford to play from your original bankroll. Plus, the fact that losing in the first few rounds of double (#2-4) even across many instances puts you in a smaller hole than being in the higher double rounds (#6-10) on even only a couple instances. This might buy you playing time for your many successes to build up your bankroll in time for you to face the instances that have digressed to the higher double rounds? I still don't know if this is actually valid in the long run... I'm thinking not. But I suspect it prolongs your play time. Perhaps modifying the strategy to somehow scale up your betting once a certain bankroll level has been achieved... (building off that - perhaps returning to the higher double up instances that you left behind only once your bankroll has been scaled high enough to make the risk worth it.) I'm no mathematician so these are all guesses.
hey, i tested this, i played at a local casino while playing BJ. my gf kept score on her phone, i used a 15 bar version and instead of eliminating columns when i reach 80 euros, i just keep playing 80 until i win, instead of going up to 160. it worked and we made 300 euros profit. i tested it on my phone many times and it seems there is some kind of statistical advantage.
May I know what's the martingale progression you're using? You stopped at 80 euros which is how many level?
@@vincentang6695 either bank roll 300 - 5,10,20,40 or 500 - 10,20,40,80. Most of the money is made when you double down or split. Sometimes this system just keeps me in the same place. But I rarely lose more than I'm making. When the 40s stack up too much I prefer to start a fresh start
@@kith4312 Thank you very much for the explanation. Will test it out.
@@vincentang6695 you're welcome, I should increase increments like he said I'm the video to speed up the process. I have only been testing for a few days. I managed to make a few hundreds with this method though. It's important that you stop and take frequent breaks if you see profit and start over later. As it can become exhausting
PAI Gow? Why not use a Wheel to demo with?
That is definitely a good idea.
Ok so what if you have a column that keeps losing instead of eliminating it take those losses and put them in the other columns so now instead of betting $5 in columns 1 2 4 or whatever you're betting $12 in those columns
maybe... try it and see if it works
@@ThanhNguyen-qs3ct thats a good idea as well.
Can you explain the same strategy on roulette
just 50/50 dude!
Martingale won't work in anything that has an edge against you. Let's say it's roulette and the edge is an even 5% and your first bet on red is 1$. The series would be 1, 2, 4, 8,16, 32. By the time it's $32 you're still only going to make $1profit if you win, if there was no edge, but because there IS a 5% house edge, what's 5% of $32? It's $1.60. In the long term, every time you bet $32 to make $1 you're also losing $1.60 to the house, so even though you win you really lose 60 cents. The $32 bet just shows the most clearly how the house edge will beat you long term, but it will beat you even on the lower bets, just not as dramatically, more grindingly. What's really happening is that it's the same as flat betting the average of your long term martingale bets. It would average out to about $3 per bet so it's the same as flat betting $3 and you losing 15 cents every time. It's the same if you increase by lower amounts than double, it's still the average of whatever the series is. The only way you can ever win in a casino is if you hit a jackpot in slots early on and then never go to the casino again.
That if you're running trades back to back...
In forex with proper risk management it works consistently 💯
I suppose if the price levels were wide enough that the spread/commissions were a very small percentage of the average return per series. Exchanges are just way too greedy for most systems to be profitable.@@quintonnkoane9885
Not true whatsoever I’m up in blackjack over 5k in a month using martingale but I only martingale to a certain point around 4 losses i a row max
Interesting, but 1 month is still a relatively short test. Somebody would have noticed if Martingale worked in blackjack before you did by now wouldn't they? I'll try it in a demo though, thanks for mentioning it.@@slideman1249
if someone is dumb enough to play double zero roulette, they deserve to lose their money😂😂
Can this be modified for sports betting?
Yes
@scottybear how would it be?
@@incomeoracle you understand how the Martingale works?
@@scottybear yes.
@@incomeoracle then you might need to make some adjustments based on price you get on the game you are betting.
First time trying this on roulette and it has gone horribly, unfortunately. Every large bet I did seemed to lose, so I ended up with lots of small wins but lots of big losses. I guess that's just the luck of the draw. I may tweak things and try again but just wanted to let everyone know that this isn't foolproof. It's still very easy to lose your money with this strategy.
How did your subsequent sessions go?
@@budman-tw6rr not well, unfortunately. It was just more of the same bad luck when it came to the big bets.
Try it with trading with a 60% or more strategy and let the winners run. One good trend can wipe out all loses. Just my opinion
Interesting system, but you need to adjust your bets. At the 180 level and above you are actually losing money on your win. the 180 doesn't cover the 197 you bet previously in that column. at the 350 level you would have bet 377 in that column.
thank you!
Thank you for the time you put into this.
SO... Basically, you are Martingale-ing 5 instances (sessions), but instead of consecutive bets, it ends up being every 5th bet (or however number or sessions you run, which could still lose, but less likely? I Like it.
I still need a stop loss (which another series can make up) and a stop win to feel comfortable. Thanks again
Its not less likely. Same probability.
I used this strategy at the casino on the big 20 money wheel that the 5 pays 5 to 1 before I knew it was illegal in the casino. It worked for me like 10 times in a row when I went to Atlantic City. There was one time I hit the table limit so I left because it wouldn’t work at that point. The stock market doesn’t have limits or laws against it so as long as you have enough capital, it won’t fail.
how do you find a 1:1 50% in the stock market? price action is so erratic?
@@infraredxray This is not that hard if you use indicators, for example if the RSI is below some extreme condition like 10, more often than not you will win 80% of the time on a bet after that with a typical stop loss and take profit. This situation is very rare but it does happen. You could then in theory find other indicators with extremely rare situations and start to stack those together to get more opportunities and then probably use something like this well.
Trade Hedging 1.1, even when you lose, you win . It's better to break even then taking a lost. I don't care what direction the market goes. I cut my losses and keep add to my wins. 😮 trading the trending direction this is not roulette
@@infraredxrayenter and exit at order blocks
@@josephastrahan6403 Would incorporating missed rounds into the modified strategy-where certain rounds are skipped-have any impact on improving the chances of winning?
I would like to use this strategy for BlackJack but have one question. If I double down on my bet and lose, should I mark two losses on the same chart? I use basic strategy wich calls for alot of double downs and splits.
My god please 🙏🏻 tell me this is working or not ,, and tell me How much limit put in App
It works well!
@@scottybear my God it works Dragon tiger 🙏🏻
would it be smart to add a lost to all the winning columns and subtract it from the 660 so you can slowly clear the drawdown, instead of leaving it as a lost. You'll stop playing the 3rd column but you'll let the other 4 help reduce the lost over time. Overall great strategy.
The column that is huge. Spread it within the other columns
@@misspetit this is what i was saying above
I watched every minute of your video … thank you for your efforts
thanks for watchin dude!
For sports betting works u gotta have plays that you can keep riding but work the numbers if you work the numbers that you can keep up
most people pick 50% I think
You have to bet '× 1.5 (or double bet + half bet) or triple or more after losses to win back profit. Now, the stacking adds up quickly
yes!
Will this work on football over1.5 goals around half time when the odds around the evens
good idea
Its very nice strategy of how to use martingale effectively.. thanks for this video sir.
Thanks for watching
Probably the best betting system I’ve ever seen
thank you dude.
Can i ask where you got your multiples from? Its not doubled or trippled, it seems randome that you chose 5-12-25-55-etc.? Thats the last thing i need to figure out before i can list out my own games and try it myself.
Yea I asked that myself because from 100 to 180 you would make minus even if you won the 180 bet -> you spend 197 before reaching the point of betting 180. that doesn’t make sense to me..
How do you keep track of these columns inside a casino?
I bring a cheat sheet
I am completely confused lol! Can you run that by us again?
11:30 got a little confusing kinda made no sense jumbled things and changed wins and losses
yes true... it was such a good video I have to keep it even if it had some mistakes. :(
Very cool strategy, appreciate you sharing it!
Thanks for watching!
How much do you suggest bankroll to be if you ran 5 columns? And what about 10?
maybe a 1000 bucks, you can run 10 columns... the more you run the lower the risk posting larger bets
The odds of winning 20 times in a row on even money bets with a 2.7% VIG is 625,124 to one. RIDICULOUS! Just try to win a couple in a row over and over again.
Thanks for your comment!
No real reason to use any version of a marty since there are many better progressions available.
Please tell me about other strategies....
What better progressions?
10$ 5 bet martingale. With 310$. I profited 220$ 3 times. On the 4th day i lost the 310$ and dipped. Still stings.
playing online i best winning streak was 5 times. but i lost 12 straight and 1 time i lost 13 straight. as many say the online games are rigged
yeah I don't trust online either.
I've been making every strat into Marti(hollandish to Marti,Oscars grind to marti etc.) and found this awesome technique and now I have to drop everything and try this one ,thanks much Scotty
I'ma name this "GS KAGEBUNSHIN" means grand scotty shadow clones
Do you have a martingale for Craps ?
@overdose28 what’s your progress been so far?
Doesn't actually do anything. All you are doing is obscuring your losses with a bunch of random betting rules. You have the same odds of winning or losing with every new hand so how much you bet and when makes no difference.
Thanks for the video, I think this may help psychologically with applying a stop loss with Martingale which is difficult to do.
No prob!
You're right
Im so confused on your chart?? I dont get the logic here. Idk if its bc Im not familiar with the game youre playing. So, when and how are you updating your chart?
So, after 5 wins (or 7, however many columns you have) you move on to the next higher bet? Or you just martingale on lets say for example the 4th bet until you reach another win? At 17:35 you finally take a loss, then you start your chart back over on the 1st column? I dont know when you move on to the next higher bet. At 19:10 you take another couple losses but then you start at the 5th column? I really wish I understood... lol. I want to try this on baccarat but need some more guidance
No worries thanks for watching and leaving a comment.
I just found this and I'm glad I did. I'm testing it out on baccarat and so far it's working great. I'm using a five step Grand Martingale (1 - 3 - 7 - 15 - 31) and if I bust out (which hasn't happened yet) I drop the column and replace it with a new one. I play until I hit my win target. Thanks!
P.S. I'm calling this the Martingale Grid. Sounds more impressive. :)
Good stuff
any update? still working well for you?
Any update. Are you still doing well with it?
How many columns do you use with it 5 or 10?
Even if it doesnt make me rich its the best theory that i have seen in my life. U should win an award❤
Thank you!
Very interesting. 250 spins in euro roulette and up 230 units using 1-3-7-…grand M. Have had to make the 63 unit bet six times and the 127 twice. Seems to put it up to random luck. I like the idea of not making the 127 bet and spreading it to make back the 121 loss.
Any strategy is best used when you set a profit target and a stop loss. Looking forward to testing it to 10,000 spins and see what happens. Thanks for this innovative twist!
goodluck, comeback and tell me how you did
How's it going?
Scotty I believe you may have the closest thing I have seen to a winning system. Sufficient bank roll, nerves of steel and intestinal fortitude to match, this could almost not fail. A cent online game and $20 or so would be way to try. Also if you got in a little, amount could be split into 10 columns next round. A progression of 1, 2, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63 may work. Also if at any point you break even or up 1 or more units, restart. Thank you for your ideas. Certainly thinking outside the box.
Thank you dude! I won some money with it!
@The Baccologist Thank you, ive made some good money with it.
A WINNING SYSTEM IS NOT A PROGRESSIVE STRATEGY ONLY IT MUST BE PAIRED WITH KNOWLEDGE OR IT WILL FAIL. YOU MUST KNOW WHERE TO PLACE YOUR WAGER AND WHEN TO DO SO ALSO, YOU CAN NOT PLACE YOUR BET BLINDLY ON RED OR BLACK AND EXPECT THIS MATHEMATICAL SYSTEM TO SAVE YOU, CAUSE IN CANNOT,
@@scottybear hello what did The Baccologist say? I think he deleted his comment. I really want to know please. Maybe i cld use it to improve your strat. Ty!
@@nagmus887 dont really remember.
hello sir , I am student , Does this strategy work? Do u have any other Strategy than that?
It works! But it's a risk... If it was 100% I would be millionaire
@@scottybear sir can you tell me which sport should i choose to Bet using this martingale strategy?
is USA football good option than Soccer?
i find normal SOCCER hard bcoz there are 50 chances of Match Draw...
Need your Genuine Advice on this 🙏🙏🙏
Is there any good way to memorize this, so it would be more usefull in casinos?
Great system for online casinos!
you can take a small sheet of paper to the table with you, the casino welcomes system players
@@scottybear OK that's interesting! Didn't knew that.
Might gonna try this! Thanks sir^^
@@Unspeakable_Nihilistic no problem! Good luck
Im thinking of doing a sheet that is laminated, and some couple of dry erase markers and a small bag of wipes out to do the trick !!!
@@subsea8559😀That may be a bit much. Paper in pencil. Have you tired it?
Martingale the best strategy. You just discipline the bettings and timing bet.
It is the best!!
Is there any system on baccarat we can play with this betting sequence?
You can use it on baccarat
@@scottybear which system to play ?
Have you got any please ?
@@elioe2776 yup the video shows
@@scottybear Yes I watched whole video, I mean you haven’t show on baccarat how it’s work which strategy to play it on baccarat.
Thanks
Also what games does this work best on? Blackjack? Roulette? Baccarat?
I feel it works well with anything near 50/50 outcome.
Baccarat
@@brianteskey2425 yes!!
@@scottybear No, "near" is not enough. You still need a player advantage to beat the Casino. Betting progressions itself cannot overcome House advantage, no matter how constructive they are. (You should know that as a former Casino Dealer).
@@kristofferkarlsson4260 so u think this is not that good strategy? do u have any sir
I’m not understanding what you’re doing not clear, plus what’s starting bankroll?
No problem! Thanks for watching!
Hey Scotty, Bear, thank you for sharing this cool strategy. In one session how much are you looking to make? Say on a bankroll of $3000 with a $10 limit, what is your goal before you walk away?
I just keep it going till it breaks.
Anyone tried this with binary options playing with the trend?
should do that.
Remember, before you walk in the casino, you are even.
true!
What's your stop loss?
And how many wins do you need at least to collect your stop loss?
I don’t do stop losses
If you bet martingale you must win enough to overcome the big loss when it happens. Do you know how many wins it takes to overcome the big loss?
But if you can’t win that much then why not do opposite in the double if you win in the same manner? Why is it you lose more than a successful win through the system? So you end up losing more than you win doing it both ways. The house edge kicks in when you actually realize this. With that being said everyone will need to bet in a way they are convinced will help them. It’s always a system of betting.
Thanks for your comment
How many times have you tried this?
many, and have tested over and over. it works well
Brilliant if u ask me.. this can be layered on to another martingale strategy and you basically have a cheat code right there to guaranteed profits
Thank you!
I use this in trading idea is doubling lot after a loss it fk works@@scottybear
It took me awhile to get what you were whacking at lol I’m at min 14 of the video but now that I understand that makes a lot of sense
Casinos have table min and max limits that prevent you to keep doubling. This system will fail and when it does you lose your entire bankroll.
Ah, you didn’t watch the video
Lol...just eliminate the column?!?!?! Why don't you spread it to the other columns?
What a time consuming demo - with all the pushes, Pai Gow is a terrible choice to use for illustration purposes!
Yes, I should have used the wheel
Way too many pushes, this game is stupid. Bacarat seems better for this? Interesting stuff though what's preventing a particular column from losing like 10 in a row? Just betting bankers and doubling your bet every loss has the same chance as using multiple columns. Meaning usually you win, but get wiped out if you play long enough. No reason you'd have a better chance of not losing 7+ in a row with 1 column or multiple. I will test this out see how it goes
yes the game moved too slow
This strategy is absolute nonsene. You play like 10 Martingale players. And you will losse like 10 Martingale players. When you eliminate a column (because of loosing too often) it has actually accumluated 100s of dollars lost, while you only win a liite over 5 $ for each other column winning.
you will always get one column which will bust you the other columns you are winning small amounts not enough to compensate for the one that busts you
Let something hit 4 times in a row then go on the color
Sir...Do u use this in Sports Betting ??🤔🤔
If Not ?
Then plz make video on Soort Betting also??
I used it mostly on sports betting, but it dont make for a great demonstration on a video.
@@scottybear Sir i am new Sport Betting...
Should i use this strategy in Sports Betting As a Beginner...
Need your Advice🙏🙏
@@VJsinginghrawat I've done well with it... but its gambling so be careful.
@@scottybear thx for advice👍
You really have a way of explaining things in a very confusing way. What the hell is houseway? Why are you skipping blocks in the chart?
yeah i'm not very good.
@@scottybear Thanks for answering my questions.
@@williamhoudersheldt7076 anytime
@@williamhoudersheldt7076 anytime.
I like this a lot since you know it well would the higher amount of rows you done better? Or is that more risky?
yes more rows is better, few guys have ran tests on this system in the comments... you can read what their finding have been.
Can you apply this strategy to game called aviator please. To win at 2x or loose gameplay
dont know, im not really a gamer
That's what I play, but there is a different martingale strategy... if you lose 2 in a row (both under 2x) you sit out and don't bet again until you see >2.0, then continue your progression. If you win you go back to betting 1 unit. E.g. Bet 1, lose. Bet 2 units, lose again... sit out until the next >2.0, then bet 4 units, then 8 units... then sit out again. Until you get a win, then go back to 1 unit. My first 4 bets are martingale, then fibonacci for 5th and 6th bets (add previous 2 bets). 5th or 6th win, go back to 3rd or 4th. If i lose 6 I'm out, start over. Won't go broke at least. I've found it works reasonably well, you can avoid those long streaks of under 2.0x.. since you sit out after 2 in a row. But once in a while you can lose all 6.
@@tqsuited
How many bets you must win in a day to collect your stop loss?
For example if you're willing to risk $1000, how many bets you have to win to collect the money you're risking?
I would like to see you use his while playing baccarat. With any system you like. And lets see how it turns out.
I lasted about 45 minutes playing baccarat using this guys system…And I had a deep bankroll…Now I have nothing….Absolutely nothing!!! OMG, I have never been this devastated by a system! It was 45 minutes of pure torture. I would have felt better if I just lit my money on fire with a blow torch. It would have saved me from this 45 minutes of pure hell on wheels! OMFG!!!!! WTF!!!!!!! What the hell man!
Thanks for trying!
@@scottybear
I think you & your little system sucks!
@@drewchan338 Thanks!
Excellent video. I'm going to try this out with Binary Options for Forex. In that case it is actually possible to gain an edge by trading currency pairs that are trending and only taking trades in the direction of the dominant trend.
Also with trading you can set daily profit and loss targets so for example if I'm down $500 on a red day I call it quits but maybe my winning days are $1000. So even if there are a few bad days here and there over time with an edge it should be profitable.
Does it work?
@@jonathanfigueroa2892 Kind of. It definitely keeps you going longer but I had the feeling that I was just drawing out the inevitable.
It still has the same pitfalls as the regular martingale strategy where you end up getting unlucky in one particular column and getting blown up. I was using it on a shorter timeframe (30 second) chart to test it rapidly but your edge as a trader there is almost nonexistant because you're getting stopped out by market noise. It's basically a coinflip and we know what can happen with those.
I'd like to try it again on a longer timeframe, like the 5min chart and see how it does.
@@ghost9pm407 let me know what are the results for longer timeframe
@@jonathanfigueroa2892 You're welcome to try as well. It's easy to start. I use a service called PocketOption. They have a phone app as well as a website and they have a free demo account. It's fun to mess around with.
I am trying the same but with crypto futures also using trend trading as an edge and 1:2 RR.
Do you make any profit or broke even when you cleared all the columns?
Kicking the loss can down the road I think. BUT... maybe we'll make some money and die before that day comes! lol
Look at a much simpler version that i just created. I posted it 5 minutes ago.
@@CarschA what version?
@@rodrigopetrus1978 Look for another post i made here and you'll find it.
If it's not banned or forbidden from casinos, it's not working.
Ok!
Do u think that the most likely place to run this system successfully is the roulette, choosing or always red or always black? Because it is 50/50 stake (if u don’t count with the green) and the most losses u have, most likely it will be to get a win in the next one, and for that reason that should prevent us to enter a massive losing streak. Greetings from Portugal
anything 50/50
I play a similar betting progression which allows me around 19 chances to recoup my losses with the martingale. with this system, you are playing if you get a loss every fifth spin will kill your bankroll, like spin #1,6,11,16,21,26,31, etc. or 2,7,12,17,22,27,32, etc. so be mindful of that in the example above., so the key here is to know where to place your bet and why you must know the why or you are simply guessing.
which betting progression do you play?
Which progression are u playing