Don't Pop The Hood... (2025 Chevy Silverado Trail Boss Custom)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
  • Today I drive and review a 2025 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Trail Boss Custom!
    Chevy Provo: www.larryhmill...
    Learn How To Save Time And Money The Next Time You Buy A Car: benjaminhardy....
    Second Channel: / @thebenhardyshow
    Instagram: ben_hardypl
    Facebook: @benhardycar

Комментарии • 121

  • @trobbins88
    @trobbins88 2 месяца назад +3

    My ‘23 Sierra Elevation with the 5.3L V8 gets around 20mpg on the highway consistently. It has just over 20k miles without any issues. I’m happy I passed on the 4cyl.

  • @KirbyPuffy123
    @KirbyPuffy123 2 месяца назад +5

    Ay! I love the 2.7 engine cuz it sounds like a turbo whistle makes me feel like im driving a real truck this is awesome

  • @AriePharmD
    @AriePharmD 2 месяца назад +7

    Really like my 23 custom trail boss Z71 2.7 liters with zero issues and 19,200 miles.

    • @robertsn6584
      @robertsn6584 Месяц назад

      What real miming do you get

    • @AriePharmD
      @AriePharmD Месяц назад

      @
      Mileage?
      17 est in town which is primarily what I drive. 18-19 hwy depending on speed

  • @Retnuh1337
    @Retnuh1337 2 месяца назад +2

    I used to own an F350 6.7 Diesel. I recently drove the 2.7 and was very suprised on the power it had. I don't do any heavy hauling so I went with the 1500 Trail Boss Custom with the 2.7. Plus the price savings getting the 2.7 vs the 6.2 was a lot. I ended up getting a 2024 for $43k plus tax, tag, and title. Specs are below comparing the 6.2 vs the 2.7.
    6.2L EcoTec3 V8 engine
    420 hp [313 kW] @ 5600 rpm
    460 lb-ft of torque [624 Nm] @ 4100 rpm
    TurboMax engine
    310 hp [231 kW] @ 5600 rpm
    430 lb-ft of torque [583 Nm] @ 3000 rpm

  • @cheeng1
    @cheeng1 2 месяца назад +2

    At elevation, the TurboMax is punchy off the line, I think more punch than the v8. It also gets better mpg overall (barely). Most folks forget, the TurboMax is the bottom engine replacement for GM and most importantly, it helps GM fleet mpg so they can keep the v8.
    That said, I get 16-20 city and 21-27 with my 5.3.

  • @4869richard
    @4869richard 2 месяца назад +48

    Full-size truck should not have four cylinders in them

    • @Blue-moon12
      @Blue-moon12 2 месяца назад +6

      Exactly V6 minimum

    • @AnsrMax
      @AnsrMax 2 месяца назад +6

      And the abysmal fuel economy.

    • @DEEZEEMTB
      @DEEZEEMTB 2 месяца назад +3

      I had to go back and listen again. 4 banger in a full size pickup 👎🏽

    • @DarrenAwe16
      @DarrenAwe16 2 месяца назад +1

      I don't know who's idea is it to put a 4 cylinder engine in a full size truck. Insane!

    • @Michael-eg3hc
      @Michael-eg3hc 2 месяца назад

      They have a 4 cylinder so they can still have v8s, it evens out their emissions

  • @The-Jokes-on-You
    @The-Jokes-on-You 2 месяца назад +20

    A four banger that is getting 16 around town & 17-18 highway!!!!! Why would anyone even consider this much less buy it? Just get the V8

    • @robertchapman4488
      @robertchapman4488 2 месяца назад +2

      At the end of every week when I fill up I'm averaging between 19.8 to 21 mi per gallon every single time. If I jump straight on the highway and go on a trip I'll get 24. And it's cheaper

    • @robertchapman4488
      @robertchapman4488 2 месяца назад +1

      For one because this engine isn't crapping out as bad as the 5.3 and 6.2 and on top of it the gas mileage is as bad as that guy saying between 19 and 21 miles per gallon every week City / highway if I jump straight on the highway I'll get 24 no problem.

    • @johnlittle6711
      @johnlittle6711 2 месяца назад +1

      @@robertchapman4488 I have a heavy foot and I am getting 21 per gallon. GMC reg cab short bed sierra. You would think the so called experts who do these reviews would get the facts straight.

    • @joshtaylor1416
      @joshtaylor1416 2 месяца назад

      @@robertchapman4488my trailboss 5.3 gets better mileage than that. Lol oh ya the 2.7s are oil burners

    • @MrSmith223
      @MrSmith223 10 дней назад

      @@robertchapman4488 not to mention the 100k warranty

  • @briandonald
    @briandonald 2 месяца назад +3

    It was actually the 80's when there was a mass shift to smaller vehicles/engines.

  • @rarvizu2
    @rarvizu2 2 месяца назад +4

    He keeps saying small engine, but have you seen the piston size on this four-cylinder that Chevy makes… They are huge!

    • @MrRjsnowden
      @MrRjsnowden 2 месяца назад

      So what its still a small displacement enginge using high pressure boost to make most of its power and torgque.

    • @herminquijano
      @herminquijano 13 дней назад

      still a 4 :/

  • @MrSmith223
    @MrSmith223 10 дней назад

    I think one selling point of the 4cyl is the 100k power train warranty vs the 60k on the 5.3. I test drove both and the 4cyl def felt more torque. Highway they felt the same. Never thought I'd say this but the lil 4banger was pretty comparable.

  • @briandonald
    @briandonald 2 месяца назад +8

    MPG is 16 & 17 with a 4 banger? Yikes!

  • @robertchapman4488
    @robertchapman4488 2 месяца назад +2

    I've had the 5.3 and now I have the 2.7 I don't have any regrets and the gas mileage isn't near as bad as what you just said. In the biggest reason is the two GM v8s are shit. They've had nothing but problems.

  • @JackMeoff-zr4uo
    @JackMeoff-zr4uo 2 месяца назад +14

    54k for a custom with a 4 banger????? Yo someone is taking crazy pills!!!!! Who is this made for?

    • @Blue-moon12
      @Blue-moon12 2 месяца назад +2

      Definitely not a workman

    • @linhunnicutt6556
      @linhunnicutt6556 2 месяца назад +2

      I wouldn't buy that size truck with a four cylinder.

    • @Mgoblagulkablong
      @Mgoblagulkablong 2 месяца назад

      guess GM needs money for their child gender surgery program - no joke, GM is offiicially funding a child transitioning program

  • @erickisel8668
    @erickisel8668 2 месяца назад

    @Ben Hardy: More midsize pickup reviews please and thank you

  • @jbug2350
    @jbug2350 2 месяца назад +3

    Very nice truck

  • @mikeshull4903
    @mikeshull4903 2 месяца назад +1

    People such as myself bought the 2.7 for the massive rebates. 5.3 trail boss custom will cost you about 7-8k more

  • @markharrison6656
    @markharrison6656 28 дней назад

    Reliability is the reason you get the 4 cylinder. The 5.3 and 6.2 implode.

  • @jeffgrise4386
    @jeffgrise4386 2 месяца назад +9

    Bring back 4.3

    • @boomee78
      @boomee78 2 месяца назад

      Not happening

  • @grizzly8960
    @grizzly8960 Месяц назад

    Have a 2025 custom trail boss with the duromax 3.0 love it - 26 mixed 30-35 highway

  • @MichaelJohnson-pg1zg
    @MichaelJohnson-pg1zg 2 месяца назад +1

    It's because the price 48,000 for 4 cylinder turbo Max full size truck and a full size V8 LT V8, LTZ 57,000 Town and country 60,000 or more, also 2.7 turbo Maxx is better than the 5.3 now that's amazing.

  • @putz173
    @putz173 2 месяца назад +1

    averaging 10.2 l/100 so far with my 2.7 100% city driving, regular fuel. they make more torque than the 5.3, dont need premium like the 6. 2, and doesnt have lifter issues that both v8's have. the audio track does suck.

  • @scottbrawley407
    @scottbrawley407 2 месяца назад +2

    2025 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Custom Z71 Trail Boss Dark Essentials 2.7L TurboMax 4-Cylinder 8-Speed Automatic Crew Cab 4X4!

  • @curtshelp6170
    @curtshelp6170 2 месяца назад +3

    I'd never buy a 4 cylinder full size, no matter the power numbers, It obviously doesn't help with Fuel economy.. The diesel is the coolest engine for this truck.

  • @Blue-moon12
    @Blue-moon12 2 месяца назад +4

    Manufacturers don't have to follow EPA as such, they get huge incentives to comply. All about the money

    • @KG-kq9tk
      @KG-kq9tk 2 месяца назад

      Wildly obtuse (and I suspect purposefully so) big govt green new deal nonsense apologist comment. That's like saying you didn't force a girl to "make love" with you. You just made her know that she would be way better off if she did. Wink wink.
      The Biden admin...the DNC and parts of the RNC are all pushing for The Great Reset "fake green/real slow rolled socialism" agenda. None of it is about actually making things green. And corporations who want to still make money...are...no duh....going to go along with the govt's incentives. But blaming the corporations for that....while apologizing and scapegoating the actual culprits...the govt....is next level disingenuous and mental acrobatics.

  • @paulpryor850
    @paulpryor850 2 месяца назад

    I'm not really a Chevy guy. However, I had 17' F-150 XLT with the 2.7 Ecoboost. I swapped the turbo for a Waylon. Then, added intercoolers and an oil can seperator. Plus, a simple K&N air cleaner and turbo exhaust system. When done, I got over 450 HP and averaged 25+ mpg.on premium gasoline. I loved that truck! Some drunk moron plowed into me. During Covid! The vehicle wasn't fixed properly, and I couldn't replace it because these dealers were getting MSRP plus markups. So I bought a loaded Nissan Titan PRO4X. That I absolutely hated, but was Lemon Lawed. I wanted a 2.7 F-150 Lariat, but Ford stopped making them. So, I bought a 24' Tacoma Limited. I'm not a fan! I'm probably going to dump it this spring for another 2.7 Ecoboost XLT. I'd rather get a lesser option pickup truck. Then, play with these disposable trucks that consumers have to turn to the aftermarket to make a decent vehicle. I'm seriously thinking about restomoding an old truck. I think I'd be better off than buy this new junk.....

    • @jimmyneutron3055
      @jimmyneutron3055 2 месяца назад

      At least ford has a v6 2.7. This one is the 4 cylinder in a Camry or civic 😅

  • @MichaelJohnson-pg1zg
    @MichaelJohnson-pg1zg 2 месяца назад

    Question what about the four cylinder in the Colorado they drink a lot of gas too.

  • @Blue-moon12
    @Blue-moon12 2 месяца назад +6

    Where is the rest of the engine haha. Same power as my Frontier 😂

    • @canolocotv
      @canolocotv 2 месяца назад +3

      I said the same thing and we get better miles per gallon then this Chevy lol

    • @robertchapman4488
      @robertchapman4488 2 месяца назад +1

      Your frontier doesn't come close to the torque.

    • @canolocotv
      @canolocotv 2 месяца назад +1

      @ it does the job I need it to do

    • @Blue-moon12
      @Blue-moon12 2 месяца назад

      ​​@@robertchapman4488Yes, but it doesn't need that much torque. The MPG is awful, for a 4 cylinder

    • @Blue-moon12
      @Blue-moon12 2 месяца назад

      ​@@canolocotvExactly

  • @richki.24
    @richki.24 2 месяца назад +3

    was it me or were those front upper control arm scary thin

    • @joevreeland6142
      @joevreeland6142 2 месяца назад +1

      The uppes are just locators for the upper balls, the lowers do all the lifting and weight bearing --- torsion bars, ya know.

  • @edwardgonzalez6437
    @edwardgonzalez6437 2 месяца назад

    I just bought a 2025 Silverado V8 the salesmen and other reps at the dealer were trying to sell me hard on the custom four cylinder lol. They were touting that the 4 cylinder was the way everyone was going to buy in the future lol. I looked at both sales price, it didnt make sense for me to downgrade lol

    • @jimmyneutron3055
      @jimmyneutron3055 2 месяца назад

      Smart I know someone who sold their 2.7 Silverado after less than one year / 12,000 miles and the dealer was offering him $26k for trade in. He paid $50k. V8 hold their values better coz no one wanna get a 4 banger in a used market.
      Gm should have came out with a 6 cylinder twin turbo like ford 2.7 or ram 3.0 i6

    • @johnlittle6711
      @johnlittle6711 Месяц назад

      I know some one who’s neighbors cousin…………

  • @Stevonoles1
    @Stevonoles1 2 месяца назад

    Can't believe they are still using the old interior on these.

  • @1lovesgreatness
    @1lovesgreatness 2 месяца назад +1

    Cheaped out at GM, couldnt even put the normal Silverado lights on the front. It doesn't look like a Silverado. They shouldn't of called that cheap looking four banger a Silverado. V-8 Silverados are the best looking and the best performing full sized trucks.

  • @rodneyhirsch2340
    @rodneyhirsch2340 2 месяца назад

    Neighbor has one with 2.7. Wicked fast. ,nope not stock. New turbo straight pipe, not loud . So far no problems

    • @TheDiameter
      @TheDiameter 2 месяца назад

      “Wicked fast” eh? I’ll guarantee you my stock Mazda will smoke it on any 1/4 mile in the country.

  • @edwardseymour1096
    @edwardseymour1096 2 месяца назад +2

    The 2.7 has better pickup than the 5.3 I was surprised

  • @marksman4004
    @marksman4004 2 месяца назад +1

    Has anyone threw a bigger aftermarket turbo on one of these yet?

  • @JRs-guitars
    @JRs-guitars 2 месяца назад

    The 5.3 gets better gas mileage 😂. But I just got a 2.7T F150. Great mpgs, but I think I'll go back to a V8 in a couple years.

  • @Jisstifer83626
    @Jisstifer83626 2 месяца назад +2

    16 around town, 17 on the highway? I think you need to go back and check your numbers..

  • @KenMcCune-wb3jp
    @KenMcCune-wb3jp 2 месяца назад +1

    If I order a Chevy Silverado trail boss I will put a big screen and 360 camera on it

  • @andrewtamkin2511
    @andrewtamkin2511 2 месяца назад +2

    4 banger sounds like crap. I sure hope they bring back a 5.3 with no crappy afm. Real reason I have not purchase a new GM product. My Last Yukon went thru 2 motors by 200k.

  • @hexhead5732
    @hexhead5732 2 месяца назад +1

    I think big trucks need a V8 it makes sense

  • @MrRjsnowden
    @MrRjsnowden 2 месяца назад

    At the very least it should be a twin turbo V6. The V8 is the way to go. The price tag on this thing is so crazy. 51K for a pretty basic truck with a 4 cylinder. Wow.

  • @monocogenit1
    @monocogenit1 2 месяца назад

    yup, not a fan of the 4cyl turbos. in any trucks really. including mid size trucks. I got a 23' Nissan Frontier Pro4X, love it. NA V6. Its been great

  • @joevreeland6142
    @joevreeland6142 2 месяца назад

    I will not be in the market for anything newer than 2005, as that is my self-imposed cutoff point. Parts are available and still exist on a lot of the new GM lineup and the computers are all very communicative - at least to me.
    I looked for and found a pair of 2005 GM SLE Crew Cabs, Z71, G80, 5.3, 1500 4WD Shortbed trucks - a 43K miles GMC Sierra (Black) and a 68K miles Chevy Silverado (Red) - added tonneaus, rail tubes, custom BOSS Entertainment heads, Rancho 5000-Series shocks, HANKOOK DynaPro tires including the spares, GMRS and 40Ch Am/USB/LSB radios, easy-drop tailgate assists and I get 15MPG Town- 21MPG Hwy in all the creature comfort I could ask for.
    I paid cash - so, no payments and seriousky lowered insurance rates for their age and low mileage.
    For right around $30K - I have two GM trucks in very close to pristine condition - which, frankly, will outlive me and my wife.
    4 cylinders sound so fey and a turbo is going to eat them up a lot earlier than a naturally asperated engine under all conditions.

  • @charleslee1227
    @charleslee1227 2 месяца назад +1

    Just like a bon fire put a fan on it it burns hot but it burns out quick turbos on small engines he’ll no

  • @BillLaBrie
    @BillLaBrie 2 месяца назад

    The 4 might get better mileage than the 5.3 in town.

  • @andyd5492
    @andyd5492 2 месяца назад +1

    17 mpg highway? This is 2024 not 2004. Has auto 4WD?

  • @killerb5726
    @killerb5726 2 месяца назад

    I thought they we’re eliminating the 4 cylinder from the full-size lineup. Guess not.

  • @alvinraj4308
    @alvinraj4308 2 месяца назад

    Used 2.7's for sale all over the place.

  • @edwardseymour1096
    @edwardseymour1096 2 месяца назад +1

    Chevrolet needs to make the 5.3 a little louder it’s too quiet

  • @PredsFan35
    @PredsFan35 2 месяца назад +4

    Nice truck....but FAR from $54k nice.

  • @lifeaftereverything4986
    @lifeaftereverything4986 27 дней назад

    MPG you said is totally wrong 18city/22 highway also more play load capacity with the 2.7 by a significant amount (around 200-225lbs more). The 2.7 has been in Chevy for almost 7 years and the 4yrs in this high output model with good reliability (the 5.3 is destroying lifters with it cylinder deactivation system). I think you have some of the best walkthroughs of trucks in RUclips but in this case maybe do some more research before you comment on how bad it is.

  • @nancyclark8503
    @nancyclark8503 2 месяца назад

    That truck needs at least the 5.3 v8

  • @jmn3
    @jmn3 2 месяца назад

    Man that engine sound is rough on a big truck

  • @robertsn6584
    @robertsn6584 Месяц назад

    4 cylinder gets better around town mileage. V8 gets better highway mileage

  • @Mike857571
    @Mike857571 2 месяца назад

    You can hear the absolute disappointment in Ben’s voice lol

  • @blast4me754
    @blast4me754 2 месяца назад

    I must be one boring basic person because this truck has enough on the inside for me. Every time I've driven a luxury type car I never used any of the luxury gadgets.

  • @michaelwcantin9193
    @michaelwcantin9193 2 месяца назад +2

    Sounds horrible. Love my 24 with its 5.3.

  • @davidrosenblum2178
    @davidrosenblum2178 2 месяца назад +1

    Sounds like a lawnmower...

  • @edaddyx2hansonjr436
    @edaddyx2hansonjr436 2 месяца назад +1

    Chevys trim tier system makes no sense.

  • @AlexAlex-gs1xh
    @AlexAlex-gs1xh 2 месяца назад

    Why does your thumnail on this look like you are depressed 😂😂

    • @Blue-moon12
      @Blue-moon12 2 месяца назад

      No wonder with this truck and it's 4 cylinder engine

    • @AlexAlex-gs1xh
      @AlexAlex-gs1xh 2 месяца назад

      @Blue-moon12 not a reason to be depressed.

  • @JohnnyTaxonomy
    @JohnnyTaxonomy 2 месяца назад +2

    What horrible MPG

    • @robertchapman4488
      @robertchapman4488 2 месяца назад

      I averaged 20 with all types of driving, jump straight on the highway you'll get 24 to 25 MPG

  • @AutoEnthusiastJC
    @AutoEnthusiastJC 2 месяца назад +1

    I’d be okay with it if it were reliable, but I’ve heard bad things.

    • @robertchapman4488
      @robertchapman4488 2 месяца назад

      They don't have near the problems as the two GM v8s. I don't know what you're reading they've had nothing but problems with the two v8s since 2011. I work for a parts store we sell more 5.3 l than any other engine.They're always going bad.

    • @johnlittle6711
      @johnlittle6711 2 месяца назад

      You heard wrong. They have been around since 2019 with very few problems.

  • @christos881
    @christos881 2 месяца назад

    Base trim with a 4 banger for $53k, good lord.

  • @JoseDiaz-qw7mg
    @JoseDiaz-qw7mg 2 месяца назад

    Full Size and 4 cyls do not mix well on the same sentence

  • @TS-KDMF1777
    @TS-KDMF1777 2 месяца назад

    Trailboss=v8
    Trail trainee =4cyl

  • @classiccorvettesmusclecars5846
    @classiccorvettesmusclecars5846 2 месяца назад

    A 4cyl with GMs problematic 8spd (where there’s a class action lawsuit) is quite the pairing… Sign me up….not

    • @robertsn6584
      @robertsn6584 Месяц назад

      They're re did the 8 speed band fixed the problems in this truck

  • @narcissist31
    @narcissist31 2 месяца назад

    It's 2025 and chevy is still scamming with the tiny screen and the fact that every truck doesn't come keyless entry button on at least the front handles. You should not have to opt for an LT to get the larger screen, this should not be an option, get with the times. There are 30k cars that have larger screens than this. I feel that at this point every truck should have the 13" screen. Cut the crap chevy. And it's not like these trail boss custom are cheap, I'm sure the sticker on this is over 50.

  • @Coheed420
    @Coheed420 2 месяца назад

    yeah it's so dumb putting a smaller engine with a turbo in a truck trying to move around the same amount of weight a V8 normally would. of course you're gonna use more gas. that's what the dumb government we have now decided...

  • @rakhsiprayogo82
    @rakhsiprayogo82 2 месяца назад +4

    This is Slower than a Ford F 150

    • @TheDiameter
      @TheDiameter 2 месяца назад +1

      @Bullseye1539lol, no

  • @mikeprzlomski2092
    @mikeprzlomski2092 2 месяца назад

    4 cylinder 🤣😂🤣

  • @ericmulerometaldrummer
    @ericmulerometaldrummer 2 месяца назад

    This is not practical

  • @YZFR1000
    @YZFR1000 2 месяца назад +3

    Nice truck with a garbage engine

    • @advancedscarecrow
      @advancedscarecrow 2 месяца назад

      Naw it’s only nice looking 👀 imagine if you went to a strip club 😂

  • @cheeng1
    @cheeng1 2 месяца назад

    At elevation, the TurboMax is punchy off the line, I think more punch than the v8. It also gets better mpg overall (barely). Most folks forget, the TurboMax is the bottom engine replacement for GM and most importantly, it helps GM fleet mpg so they can keep the v8.