Ram Is Recalling Nearly 1 MILLION Cummins Diesels - Here's How The Truck Performs BEFORE the Recall!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
  • ( www.allTFL.com ) Check out our new spot to find ALL our TFLstudios content, from news to videos and our podcasts! Ram Is Recalling Nearly 1 Million Cummins Diesels - Here's How It Performs BEFORE the Recall.
    ( / tflcar ) Visit our Patreon page to support the TFL team!
    Watch more videos from TFL Studios:
    The Fast Lane Truck ( / tfltruck )
    The Fast Lane Car ( / tflcar )
    TFLoffroad ( / tfloffroad )
    TFLbike ( / tflbike )
    TFLnow ( / tflnow )
    TFLclassics ( / tflclassics )
    TFLtalk ( / tfltalk )
    TFL Podcasts:
    TFL Talkin' Cars Podcast ( redcircle.com/... )
    TFL Talkin' Trucks Podcast ( redcircle.com/... )
    #ram #cummins #recall

Комментарии • 700

  • @powerstroke6.7
    @powerstroke6.7 8 месяцев назад +92

    Ford did something similar about a year ago. My truck lost about 1 MPG after the update and used more DEF. recently lost my emissions equipment in a boating accident.

    • @J.Young808
      @J.Young808 8 месяцев назад +22

      Man those boat ramps sure are brutal. 😂

    • @stevenbrooks1243
      @stevenbrooks1243 8 месяцев назад +9

      Lol hate when that happens

    • @michaelcopeland8985
      @michaelcopeland8985 8 месяцев назад +7

      I hope the boat is ok?

    • @ineedapharmists
      @ineedapharmists 8 месяцев назад +4

      If they find out, you're going to pay for an entire system or get your truck crushed. Aint worth deleting.

    • @michaelcopeland8985
      @michaelcopeland8985 8 месяцев назад

      @ineedapharmists depending where you live, you will never be checked. And without asking, I bet he kept everything

  • @randydehne8866
    @randydehne8866 4 месяца назад +7

    Seriously when are you gonna follow up on this?

  • @shockracer
    @shockracer 8 месяцев назад +123

    A dyno test before and after would be great, too.

    • @v8s4ever36
      @v8s4ever36 8 месяцев назад +15

      Yes, the best comparison would be before and after tests on the same dyno.

    • @wadebrewer7212
      @wadebrewer7212 8 месяцев назад +2

      Well....what about torque limiting. These trucks are garbage with the torque management. I dont know that you would even see a change. I have a 22 with the "little cummins"
      Once upon a time I had a Ford 6.0....it was an 05 for the F6 trans and from a dig that truck would spank my 22....even though the Cummings is rated much higher.
      The 0-60 on HO VS standard....is almost identical despite the HO having another 200 lb/ft and more HP.
      I don't think you will even see this recall in daily commenting for performance. Living with the truck pulling a service trailer and a heavy bed service box you probably will....thst requires all the beans.

    • @ryanbernard89
      @ryanbernard89 8 месяцев назад

      Tq management affects 1st-2nd I think maybe 3rd but the 1:1 ratio with 3:73 gears in ram is 4th gear think it would be fine on the dyno just lock it in 4th

    • @user-ln7of9gs4s
      @user-ln7of9gs4s 8 месяцев назад

      @@wadebrewer7212it got spanked because you call it a Cummings.

    • @wadebrewer7212
      @wadebrewer7212 8 месяцев назад

      @user-ln7of9gs4s my bad. I dont proof reed...its youtube and far from the most important thing in my life

  • @NWI_Steel
    @NWI_Steel 8 месяцев назад +251

    I'm betting power loss and fuel economy loss after the recall....

    • @NWI_Steel
      @NWI_Steel 8 месяцев назад +52

      And increased DEF usage lol

    • @noneyabizz8337
      @noneyabizz8337 8 месяцев назад +32

      Reliability loss

    • @craigquann
      @craigquann 8 месяцев назад +12

      DEF usage will drop as that's what's injected to control NOx. Fuel economy is DEFINITELY going to take a hit as it will need to run richer with more EGR to reduce combustion temps. Power may be ok as these engines have lots of tuning left on the table to compensate. And given it's not a bad as Volkswagen, it's probably not going to be as drastic. But what do I really know.

    • @lagoonrd4173
      @lagoonrd4173 8 месяцев назад +15

      💯. … had semi truck go in for maintenance and get program updates… lower power settings, drank more fuel and was gutless

    • @gebertg
      @gebertg 8 месяцев назад +11

      No power loss. This was discovered way back in 2019. The 2019s got the update years ago with recall VB6, the 2020+ already have the updated software from the factory and this includes the power increase in 2021. 2013-2018 are now getting it in the mail.

  • @braden6402
    @braden6402 7 месяцев назад +5

    When is the video of after the recall going to come out?

    • @kellyabercrombie9769
      @kellyabercrombie9769 7 месяцев назад

      I’m here looking for the answer to the same question.

  • @rjhein
    @rjhein 8 месяцев назад +34

    Hey TFL - can you please do a dyno test before/after as well? That would likely be the most conclusive - Thanks for doing these tests!!

    • @Dusdaddy
      @Dusdaddy 8 месяцев назад +1

      2019-2023 will not be recalled according to the EPA.

    • @stinkymcstinkerton1854
      @stinkymcstinkerton1854 8 месяцев назад

      Kori @Pppei is doing testing and data collection before and after the recall with an emissions engineer to see the difference. They should be able to determine the problem as well as the result. This happens in February. Hopefully late Feb or early March we will know exactly transpired. So far, no one I’ve seen posted an impact

    • @stinkymcstinkerton1854
      @stinkymcstinkerton1854 8 месяцев назад

      @@Dusdaddyis that new information? I haven’t received a notice….yet

    • @Dusdaddy
      @Dusdaddy 8 месяцев назад +2

      @@stinkymcstinkerton1854 Nothing new, it's right on the EPA's website and repeated on the CARB website. Nobody said the 2019-2023 were getting recalled except the RUclipsrs. They even stated why, nothing to fix.

    • @stinkymcstinkerton1854
      @stinkymcstinkerton1854 8 месяцев назад

      @@DusdaddyI looked it up after shortly after I posted . My first alert was from this channel. . I was relieved to read Gen 5 not included. I just got done dealing with stellantis on an ecodiesel. Gen 4. It’s wasn’t easy…
      Odd they’re testing the 22

  • @neilbrew8985
    @neilbrew8985 8 месяцев назад +11

    I would recommend everyone ignore the recall

    • @TFLtruck
      @TFLtruck  8 месяцев назад +1

      Except, CARB states will require this recall for registration renewal. Although, the EPA will allow up to three years to take care of 85% of all these truck recalls.

  • @deadeyedan444
    @deadeyedan444 7 месяцев назад +3

    What happened to Part 2? 🤷🏼‍♂️

  • @murdiesel
    @murdiesel 8 месяцев назад +18

    If Cummins does a recall why do they not recall the heating plate bolt! Thank you for the video guys!

    • @carltuckerson7718
      @carltuckerson7718 8 месяцев назад +2

      They did.

    • @petermandel2552
      @petermandel2552 8 месяцев назад +4

      Relay was recalled for staying on and melting the bolt insulator. But the killer bolt and insulator is still there waiting to weaken from years of cycling. Wiggle test still applies.

  • @Hiluxtaco
    @Hiluxtaco 8 месяцев назад +21

    Dyno the motor!

  • @edwardnelson3304
    @edwardnelson3304 8 месяцев назад +3

    We don't want to see the recall. We want TFL Truck and every truck owner to Push Back, Too Say No, we're not going to take this this.. These Trucks we're certified as having met current emissions requirements at the time of their sale. They can't dictate a change years later too private vehicle's that have already met the requirements at time of sale. TFL should find a NOX emissions facility and do a before and after test. Because I think this is all about acquiring money for EPA/CARB. We have to Say No.
    I have a question.
    Who monitored the Testing and Truck used in the testing during the EPA test???

    • @jimjones-pz1tt
      @jimjones-pz1tt 8 месяцев назад

      You expect Colorado liberals and Bay Area Californian Nathan to push back? Get a grip.

  • @JustinKingOffroad
    @JustinKingOffroad 8 месяцев назад +40

    Great initial test guys! I had an emissions recall on my f250 and didn't see any changes after pcm flash. Hopefully it's the same for you!

    • @kevinvanlohuizen2709
      @kevinvanlohuizen2709 8 месяцев назад

      Do you think Ford has been "cheating" too and trying to fix it before they get caught?

  • @charlesfuglie2491
    @charlesfuglie2491 8 месяцев назад +3

    Why would you take it for this recall??? No one is saying you have to do it.

  • @TheRamGuy
    @TheRamGuy 8 месяцев назад +17

    @TFL please find a friend shop to do a dyno test before and after. It would be very telling and make for great content

  • @anthonyrider9190
    @anthonyrider9190 8 месяцев назад +62

    I had the ECM update done two weeks ago and the only noticeable difference is DEF usage did increase. Power, performance and mileage don’t appear to be affected at this time.

    • @edwardpeters4700
      @edwardpeters4700 8 месяцев назад +15

      With it being a NOx related issue, your experience 100% makes sense. DEF is primarily used to reduce NOx emissions. With all of the big players using DEF, I would be curious if pre-update cummins trucks use less DEF than their Powerstroke or Duramax counterparts (same years).

    • @sirblood
      @sirblood 8 месяцев назад +3

      @@edwardpeters4700i’m very curious about this too. I wonder if there’s a slightly dated video comparing DEF consumption between Duramax, power stroke and Cummins

    • @stevenwescott1422
      @stevenwescott1422 8 месяцев назад +3

      For what it’s worth my 2020 duramax goes approximately 6k on a 2.5 gallon jug of def

    • @tangydiesel1886
      @tangydiesel1886 8 месяцев назад +2

      You have an idea about how much? Our 15 ram 3500 cab and chassis uses about 2.5 gallons per 50 gallons of fuel. But its worked pretty hard.

    • @anthonyrider9190
      @anthonyrider9190 8 месяцев назад

      @@stevenwescott1422 I just filled this past Friday, will see what the average is now.

  • @Ramblin_Rob
    @Ramblin_Rob 8 месяцев назад +28

    Glad they haven’t given a date yet. Keeps my favorite TFL truck in the fleet longer.😊

    • @JonBecker81
      @JonBecker81 8 месяцев назад +2

      I’m sure they’ll take it to the local dealer and will have the TFL truck in and out fast. They don’t want to be messing around with a company who has a huge RUclips and media presence. Everyone else, good luck to you.

  • @jimsugden1263
    @jimsugden1263 6 месяцев назад +5

    Anxious to see part 2, gents. 🙂

    • @Raider1836
      @Raider1836 Месяц назад +1

      They didn’t do it, because nothing changed.

  • @rubenblack9614
    @rubenblack9614 5 месяцев назад +3

    Any new updates on part 2 after the recall guys?

  • @locustvalleyfarms7241
    @locustvalleyfarms7241 8 месяцев назад +2

    You guys are really milking the content from this whole “situation”. I’m done with this channel. Adios

  • @ericcrockett6396
    @ericcrockett6396 8 месяцев назад +11

    I really like your testing procedures, my only thing is I would like to have seen the towing and empty mpg loops been the same loop. Not that it would really effect anything just more of a personal preference. The only other thing I could think of for testing would be to see if you could book a Dyno appointment and get real world horsepower and torque numbers before and after recall. That being said I love the persision and care yall are taking in doing the before and after testing

  • @dustintobler9840
    @dustintobler9840 8 месяцев назад +11

    I work at a dodge dealer. The recall is a 67A and its been out since November

    • @gebertg
      @gebertg 8 месяцев назад +2

      Only for 2013-2018. 2019 had VB6 and 2020+ came with the update from the factory.

    • @allan1062
      @allan1062 8 месяцев назад

      for 2013-2021 or all engines to 2024?

    • @crazyrunner33
      @crazyrunner33 8 месяцев назад

      Question. Why is Ram issuing this for so many trucks when the EPA says only certain 2019 trucks and 2013-2015 trucks that didn't receive S87 needs it.
      And for trucks that receive 67A without being on the EPA list, do they still get the extended warranty?

  • @wlr1589
    @wlr1589 8 месяцев назад +3

    If you have no idea when your truck will be repaired due to recall. Why are you testing now, conditions will most likely be completely different when the time comes for your recall? Could be when fuel type changes take place, temperatures and weather conditions are different invalidating this testing.

    • @jimjones-pz1tt
      @jimjones-pz1tt 8 месяцев назад

      Because they're not very smart. I'll bet Roman sells the truck before he gets the recall notice. He ain't gonna keep it until January 2027!

  • @mefford2692
    @mefford2692 8 месяцев назад +4

    Do yourselves a favor, DO NOT DO THE RECALL.

    • @Itsa_Mea
      @Itsa_Mea 8 месяцев назад

      Their truck isn't even eligible for the recall.😂

  • @burningbush2322
    @burningbush2322 5 месяцев назад +2

    Did you release the AFTER recall video and your conclusions?

  • @JMacGyver1
    @JMacGyver1 8 месяцев назад +11

    I own a 2014 VW Touareg TDI and the diesel “fix” primarily affected cold start smoothness and the amount of DEF it uses. MPG’s may have dropped by 1-2 mpg, but that could as much be related to typical aging and I feel no real power difference (using my butt dyno). I’m guessing the Cummins fix will be similar.

    • @TheNotimprezed
      @TheNotimprezed 8 месяцев назад +2

      The fix ruined my 2015. Lost over 1 second 0-60, reduced mpg and the transmission tuning was unsafe and undriveable. Then taking off from a stop you could literally count 1 one-thousand 2 one-thousand 3 one-thousand and then the car would begin to pull away. Pre fix it would run a low 7 second 0-60 with brake boost and high 7s with no brake boost. The quickest it ever ran post fix was 8.6 seconds and if you didn't brake boost it was nearly 11 seconds. Tune and TCM flash are required for those tdi.

  • @Just_Joe71
    @Just_Joe71 8 месяцев назад +2

    Everyone told you in the last video to include a Dyno test, but you didn't listen.🤦‍♂️

    • @mpeugeot
      @mpeugeot 8 месяцев назад

      but that would cost real money.

  • @gregfurr6351
    @gregfurr6351 8 месяцев назад +11

    According to a pdf from the California dept of justice the recall is for 13-19 trucks. According to the document cummins will fix the trucks (sotware update) and provide an extended emission warranty. 10 year or 120k miles from initial purchase or 4 year 48k which ever is greater. On 13-18 the warranty will cover def and scr system. 19 covers the same but adds EGR. There is nothing listed for 2020 to current so either their not eecalling those or there is a seperate recall coming. Appreciate the video but it might be for nothing. Do a search for consent decree 1/10/2024 and look for the California dept of justice. It a large doc but explains everything pretty well.

    • @tikkin11
      @tikkin11 8 месяцев назад

      Does this extended warranty cover trucks registered outside CA? The def/scr system should include the dpf as well.

    • @gregfurr6351
      @gregfurr6351 8 месяцев назад

      According to what I've seen the warranty will be for every truck that has the recall performed no matter where the truck resides. In the list of parts covered I did not see anything about the DPF

    • @Itsa_Mea
      @Itsa_Mea 8 месяцев назад +4

      Exactly! The TFL truck isn't even getting the "update".

  • @RobertKohut
    @RobertKohut 8 месяцев назад +18

    My prediction will be more DEF use and more regen over time as the DPF gets more soot from the EGR in "normal" operating mode. That would result in very little power change but some extra fuel and DEF use. Once the DPF needs more regen then fuel economy will drop some. Long term there will be the EGR cooler blockage and coking of the intake valves.

    • @workisfun...2438
      @workisfun...2438 8 месяцев назад

      Agreed

    • @tomprovenza7857
      @tomprovenza7857 8 месяцев назад

      Agreed

    • @theantiqueactionfigure
      @theantiqueactionfigure 8 месяцев назад

      The few test out the show zero power and fuel economy change. None that I've seen have tested def usage. TFL will be the bottom line. I'm behind the blue curtain in Kommiefornia so the update will be mandatory. My 2018 Limited Tungtsen Edition only has 57,000 miles on it so it's not leaving the fold anytime soon. Never say never though.

    • @mddunlap03
      @mddunlap03 8 месяцев назад

      ​@@theantiqueactionfigurehave not seen a single dyno pull before and after

    • @joshausterlitz3798
      @joshausterlitz3798 8 месяцев назад +2

      This is pretty much what happened to my 2015 jetta TDI, was getting like 45 -48MPG, after the recall it got 37 - 40MPG, they said it would be like 2MPG drop but it was actually like 6 -8MPG. Didn't make since anymore having it with the price of diesel to gas, looked into what it would be to delete it and after that got 50 - 53MPG.

  • @goodoleboy83
    @goodoleboy83 8 месяцев назад +6

    The government needs to get out of this bs. None of what they do helps in anywY.

    • @pureblood3813
      @pureblood3813 8 месяцев назад

      Nope. All the government does is makes our lives harder and more expensive. I’m so sick of this *hit

  • @Mill72
    @Mill72 8 месяцев назад +1

    All the new recall flash is utilizing more DEF to get the Nox levels down. Nothing else should be affected. The 20+ trucks already have the software from factory. Bulk of the recalls are ln the MY2013-2019. On my ‘22 uses more DEF than my ‘18. This video is moot with the 2022.

  • @RebelRam2023
    @RebelRam2023 8 месяцев назад +9

    That’s awesome that y’all are setting a current reference point. This will help to identify where the changes were made. Hopefully this update won’t neuter the Cummins like they did the ecodiesel, that truck cold would have no power from a standstill and once you hit 2k rpm it’s finally had some power

    • @Dusdaddy
      @Dusdaddy 8 месяцев назад

      Except their truck won't be recalled according to the EPA. Only the 2013-2018 will.

  • @drock6627
    @drock6627 6 месяцев назад +1

    This a RAM recall, not a Cummins recall! As a certified Cummins tech, I can not perform this recall because the 6.7 in Ram pickups is different than the B6.7. There is also the fact that the ECM and aftertreatment systems are RAM equipment not supplied by Cummins. Why does this recall not cover the B6.7 used in other REAL trucks like Mack, International and Freightliner? This is a Stellantis problem, not a Cummins problem!

  • @JonBecker81
    @JonBecker81 8 месяцев назад +3

    Everyone who deleted their Cummins and they’re getting calls to bring it in for the recall- “well sh*t”. 😂
    Edit: I guess if you don’t live in a state that does emissions checks then you don’t have to worry about the recall. Those are the states where people delete. Seems like half of the used HD diesels on FB Marketplace where I live have “deleted” in the description.

  • @jimpastore5976
    @jimpastore5976 6 месяцев назад +1

    There's no reason why this incident should cause the end of the diesel trucks. Ford and GM haven't had that problem. So Ram needs to get their you know what going and concentrate on fixing the problem honestly. They just tried to cut the corner and got caught.

  • @barrygoodrich1145
    @barrygoodrich1145 6 месяцев назад +2

    So where is the final test!!?? Will there be one?

  • @ronmitchell5552
    @ronmitchell5552 8 месяцев назад +6

    I think this has to do with California needing a bailout they're billions of dollars in the hole and now have to take from their emergency fund.

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 8 месяцев назад +1

      That’s not true at all.

    • @CrimeVid
      @CrimeVid 8 месяцев назад

      @@DeepDishPizza and I don’t think your statement is either.

    • @DeepDishPizza
      @DeepDishPizza 8 месяцев назад

      @@CrimeVid Oh really? Wanna get Doxxed? I didn’t think so.

    • @Kahless00
      @Kahless00 8 месяцев назад

      Well what you think and what's true ain't exactly the same thing.

  • @mattheweberly1047
    @mattheweberly1047 5 месяцев назад +1

    You HAD to add smoke....
    Really, if Cummins did it, other are too.
    Do yah think the EPA needed $?

  • @oldsalt8011
    @oldsalt8011 8 месяцев назад +2

    California needs to leave the rest of us alone.

  • @gabrylsisneros4791
    @gabrylsisneros4791 8 месяцев назад +8

    I think the government should have to pay for any work regarding emissions out of warranty, they're the ones mandating that it be installed

  • @ryanvogels5149
    @ryanvogels5149 3 месяца назад +1

    4 months an no follow up video? It seems like this whole thing disappeared. There isn't any new info. Interesting.

  • @rubenblack9614
    @rubenblack9614 7 месяцев назад +1

    When is TFL going to do part 2 testing, it's been a month allready.

  • @TheFlyingpolcat
    @TheFlyingpolcat 8 месяцев назад +10

    I didn’t notice any changes after the VB6 recall on my 2019. Hopefully for the later models, the recall’s impact to vehicle performance is unnoticeable.

    • @mddunlap03
      @mddunlap03 8 месяцев назад

      -3 mpg ftw

    • @Dusdaddy
      @Dusdaddy 8 месяцев назад

      The VB6 is not the recall for the Cummins fine. 67A is the recall.

  • @paullt5111
    @paullt5111 8 месяцев назад +1

    Nice truck but 10 sec to 0-60 kinda slow for modern truck, Love my HO 6.7l

  • @brady783
    @brady783 8 месяцев назад +4

    A dyno session would have answered all these items with accuracy

  • @anthonysourdiff1835
    @anthonysourdiff1835 8 месяцев назад +2

    It's too bad epa is such a stickular. I work for a hazardous waste company and receive waste from EPA waste sites and they are always the worst sites to receive from. They don't know their heads of rom their a__ most of the time. Pretty scary if you ask me. So let the EPA mess more things up here. I hope they check the other diesel engines and not just Cummins.

    • @pureblood3813
      @pureblood3813 8 месяцев назад

      I’m sure they are. The government agencies are the worst at everything.

  • @stanjacklin5968
    @stanjacklin5968 8 месяцев назад +1

    Please show me the mission's numbers between the old vehicle and the updated Knox. Co axio oxygen all those numbers during real live transparency tests

  • @markmonroe7330
    @markmonroe7330 8 месяцев назад +23

    Excellent presentation. Thank you. You know that it will not end with positive results for the owners. As with the Ford overstating the 7.3 horsepower, the manufactures just want to get your money and then do damage control after the fact if needed. With the Tesla Cybertruck, many of the promised features are "disabled" and not "completed" yet. Tesla actually wants you to buy a "unfinished" truck and just wait around for the features to be finished. Tesla has been doing this more often lately. Crazy to see missing promises for the Model S just now finally being available to customers after years of waiting. Just seems to be standard operating procedures now.

    • @R.Sole88109
      @R.Sole88109 8 месяцев назад +2

      Or like computer games then they give you a patch for the mistakes in the game that a simple play would find!

  • @RVWagginTails
    @RVWagginTails 5 месяцев назад +1

    We are waiting for the after recall to see if or when we'll have it done on our Cummins. Any update?

  • @Itsa_Mea
    @Itsa_Mea 8 месяцев назад +1

    Too bad TFL doesn't have a 2013-2018 which the recall effects.

  • @SeanBrown-m2v
    @SeanBrown-m2v 8 месяцев назад +1

    You’re not even doing the test on a 13 - 18 truck! How does this help anyone????

  • @Dusdaddy
    @Dusdaddy 8 месяцев назад +1

    Just curious, have you realized that your 2022 is not getting recalled?

  • @dawarmonky2122
    @dawarmonky2122 8 месяцев назад +1

    These guys are stretching out this recall shit longer than it took cummins to agree to pay the 1.7b

  • @datznasty1475
    @datznasty1475 8 месяцев назад +3

    They should do tests before and after recall and then deleted 😂

  • @7086crash
    @7086crash 5 месяцев назад +2

    When do we get the update? The reason this video was made…

    • @ryanvogels5149
      @ryanvogels5149 3 месяца назад +1

      its like cummins stopped everyone from posting update videos/information

  • @JeffreyLovato-k1v
    @JeffreyLovato-k1v 2 месяца назад +1

    Why haven’t you done the follow up? Did you get rid of the truck?

  • @roinas12
    @roinas12 3 месяца назад +1

    Come on, where's the part II to this video!!!! We want to KNOW!!!!

  • @d.williams6891
    @d.williams6891 8 месяцев назад +3

    For all y’all truck owners in California that have to deal with this, I raise my glass to you for putting up with these kinds of setbacks. 🍻

    • @jimjones-pz1tt
      @jimjones-pz1tt 8 месяцев назад

      I raise my glass to the Californians stupid enough to still be in California.

  • @jayfarmer3911
    @jayfarmer3911 8 месяцев назад +1

    called my dealer today and my 2022 is not part of the recall. Why is yours?

  • @OldIronLover
    @OldIronLover 8 месяцев назад +1

    My truck is on the hit list. I'm not doing the recall until I know more about it. So... looking forward to the next video. In the meantime, I wonder if anyone has done an emissions test before and after. I can certainly imagine a case where the fix causes more emissions on the test and possibly fail to pass.

  • @roinas12
    @roinas12 5 месяцев назад +1

    When are we going to see the sequel to this video with the post update results on the truck?

  • @nomadbiker4040
    @nomadbiker4040 8 месяцев назад +1

    What's up with the thumbnails with the huge clouds of smoke?

  • @wolfemanxd
    @wolfemanxd 8 месяцев назад +4

    So early I can hear the Cummins losing hp. I hope not .

  • @om603denis
    @om603denis 8 месяцев назад +1

    The towing test is weak. I carry that much weight in the bed.
    Gotta tow a 24k gooseneck.

    • @TFLtruck
      @TFLtruck  8 месяцев назад

      Our Ram 2500 is not rated for that.

  • @utboilerman
    @utboilerman 8 месяцев назад +1

    Motors= Electric
    Engines= Combustion.
    Cummins Engine.

  • @einfeldt777
    @einfeldt777 8 месяцев назад +3

    Thank you guys for really taking this seriously, can’t wait for the follow up video 👍🤗🤗

  • @johnmeyer8175
    @johnmeyer8175 5 месяцев назад +1

    Where is part 2, after the recall, episode? It’s been forever

  • @nismomike3182
    @nismomike3182 8 месяцев назад +5

    Definitely need dyno numbers pre/post.

  • @robertyoung8289
    @robertyoung8289 8 месяцев назад +1

    I'm Cummins just watching this video. 😍🥒

  • @va_innovations
    @va_innovations 8 месяцев назад +4

    I love the inclusion of the banks data monster! Great engineering and data analysis

  • @thetechguy600
    @thetechguy600 6 месяцев назад

    How is the testing coming long? I just did the recall on Friday since I live in California and was required to do it prior to renewing the registration. I'd be curious as to what exactly the ECM re-calibration does. According to the dealer service tech I talked to on Friday they said the truck mostly will just use a bit more DEF fluid and that there shouldn't be a reduction in power however I don't know if what they are saying is entirely true which is why I am waiting for your guys' testing on this.
    Also, the time it took to get this done at the dealer was pretty fast, took less than an hour to complete.

  • @JN0777
    @JN0777 8 месяцев назад +1

    Calling it now, everything will be worse post “fix”.

  • @scottshearer2833
    @scottshearer2833 6 месяцев назад +1

    Wondering when we will get an update here. I would think 2 months would be plenty of time to get the recall done and reviewed.

    • @scottshearer2833
      @scottshearer2833 4 месяца назад +1

      Starting to think they either got a letter from Ram or got paid not to do the follow-up. lol

  • @szphotography
    @szphotography 8 месяцев назад +1

    If the truck you’re testing on is only 2 years old, that would make it a model year 2021 or 2022, correct? If that’s the case, it is not subject to the 67A recall campaign. According to releases from CARB and the EPA, 2020 and up are only included in the settlement because Cummins didn’t disclose their programming specs and there is no corrective action on those model years. Is there something I’m missing?

  • @ColeSpolaric
    @ColeSpolaric 8 месяцев назад +1

    Once again, your model year is not affected from information in news reports. If you haven't gotten a recall notice, why are you bothering?

    • @TFLtruck
      @TFLtruck  8 месяцев назад

      Yes. 2019-2023 are affected , but it’s under a different recall number. Not much info on this yet.

    • @ColeSpolaric
      @ColeSpolaric 8 месяцев назад

      @@TFLtruck ok then, media hasn't been reporting on it

  • @Kevin-midmichigan
    @Kevin-midmichigan 3 месяца назад +1

    Have you posted the after recall video yet?

  • @DemsRdisguisedredcoats
    @DemsRdisguisedredcoats 8 месяцев назад +1

    Power most likely will be affected.. otherwise Ram wouldn't have had a reason for the 'defeat' software to be installed, right?

  • @gdt5430
    @gdt5430 8 месяцев назад +1

    Somebody should partner up with Gale Banks to do the testing before and after the recall. His crew has the expertise and equipment to really tell what has happened before and after.

  • @RodPratt-b9b
    @RodPratt-b9b 3 месяца назад +1

    So where is the follow up road test????

  • @Green_Streets
    @Green_Streets 8 месяцев назад +2

    The recall is just a recalibration, there is/was no defeat device. A friend at Cummin’s said the epa has not stated why they were being sued. Other diesel manufacturers don’t use the sensors that Ram decided to no longer to use. Ford and GM diesel emissions devices are no different than the rams.

    • @jeffs2809
      @jeffs2809 8 месяцев назад +1

      “Defeat device” is EPA speak for software or hardware that lets the engine produce emissions over permitted limits. Manufacturers are allowed to write software routines to do that to protect the engine or dpf/ SCR system, those routines just have to be disclosed & justified to the epa. If the manufacturer didn’t disclose that routine for whatever reason, the epa could call that a “defeat device”.

  • @p.t4769
    @p.t4769 8 месяцев назад +2

    Mine already uses twice as much def as my power stroke did, so let’s hope that don’t get worse, I’m gonna be one of the the last ones to get mine done, that’s for sure😂

  • @RodPratt-b9b
    @RodPratt-b9b 12 дней назад

    Still no follow up? I have not had recall 67A done. They claim it is free, well it is not. My local dealer is so incompetent and lying to you is the norm, I will never set foot in their again. So that leaves me with a 220 mile round trip and a day shot. I use my truck mainly for towing a 37 foot 5th wheel. Something will change, and if I were to guess it will be more DEF usage and maybe poorer fuel economy, so it will cost me. Cummins paid out a huge amount of money, but I never saw a cent, but should have, I was lied to also.
    I just received a reminder from Chrysler about the recall. The sentence that really stood out about having the recall done was , "Failure to do so could be determined as lack of Proper maintenance of your Vehicle. Wow, and now a threat! I am so threw with Chrysler.

  • @MOJeepr
    @MOJeepr 3 месяца назад +1

    What happened to the "after" video??

  • @bikesqump
    @bikesqump 8 месяцев назад +1

    If it was an EV model that had a potential to have a problem, the gov would confiscate and shred them…

  • @omardevonlittle3817
    @omardevonlittle3817 8 месяцев назад +1

    California EPA suits getting 300 million 😂

  • @location_florida
    @location_florida 8 месяцев назад +1

    @location_florida
    0 seconds ago
    I hate to break it to you mpg guys but I'm getting 19 city and 25+ highway in my 99 super duty 7.3 tuned to 400hp lifted with 33. Don't get me wrong, I like Cummins. Cummins 6bt (5.9) and the international 444 (7.3) are the best engines ever put in light trucks. To give some comparison I get 6-7.5 mpg in my 2020 Kenworth with a 450hp Cummins x15 pulling 70k, it still has def right now. Have not got it deleted yet. You will pick up more mpg by deleting the def on any engine. First thing to do to any modern diesel is to delete the def and turn off egr. You will get more mpg and be WAY more reliable

  • @gregmoessner3104
    @gregmoessner3104 8 месяцев назад +2

    What if the recall isn’t till spring time? Then you try to do the same test? I don’t think it would be accurate with the environmental changes.

    • @TFLtruck
      @TFLtruck  8 месяцев назад

      All we can do is communicate the current conditions, record it, and test.

    • @jimjones-pz1tt
      @jimjones-pz1tt 8 месяцев назад

      @@TFLtruck No, gENius. You should have waited until you received the recall notice and made an appointment for the fix. The fix the before testing the day before the fix and the after testing ASAP after the fix. What public elementary schools did you guys flunk?

  • @nashvegas4476
    @nashvegas4476 8 месяцев назад +1

    Super tough to make my Cummins use more DEF, since my 2018 Cummins had no DEF system period.

  • @matthewprather7386
    @matthewprather7386 8 месяцев назад +1

    Those big tires are still dumb.

  • @barrygoodrich1145
    @barrygoodrich1145 8 месяцев назад +1

    Any idea when part 2 will be released? What you’re doing is greatly appreciated.

  • @generalgreivus
    @generalgreivus 3 месяца назад +1

    There ever going to be a part 2?

  • @redtitan29
    @redtitan29 8 месяцев назад +1

    Ram 2500 & 3500 models built after 10/1/2019 are not affected and will not be recalled. Cummins has to pay a fine for not reporting the software scheme used on these years but the emissions fully comply with EPA regulations. This is why Cummins will not admit guilt.

  • @henryford2736
    @henryford2736 8 месяцев назад +1

    Famous words " I'm from the Government and I'm here to help"...😂

  • @mlow42
    @mlow42 8 месяцев назад +3

    The government has forgotten their role. Ridiculous.

  • @randydehne8866
    @randydehne8866 5 месяцев назад +1

    you going to follow up on this????????????

  • @Just_Joe71
    @Just_Joe71 6 месяцев назад +1

    Where is the update to this video?

  • @UncleWally678
    @UncleWally678 8 месяцев назад +1

    I think it would have been a better test if you did it closer to the time the recall work is done. Who knows how many miles you’ll put on the truck and what will change about the truck before they do the recall work. Or, it might be the middle of summer and weather could be much hotter. Just my opinion.

  • @1FiftyOverland
    @1FiftyOverland 8 месяцев назад +1

    Dont take your truck in for the recall

  • @alanharms8830
    @alanharms8830 5 месяцев назад +1

    So where is the rest of this story?

  • @colinarner790
    @colinarner790 8 месяцев назад +1

    Love that I got a banks pedal commander add during this. Don’t have a diesel yet but lovebanks

  • @wolfemanxd
    @wolfemanxd 8 месяцев назад +3

    I'm scared we're in the Ford 5.0 Diesel territory.

    • @dynoman66
      @dynoman66 8 месяцев назад +2

      Ford had a 3.0L diesel and has a 6.7L diesel. The 5.0L is a gasser. 😎

    • @MrTonaluv
      @MrTonaluv 8 месяцев назад +2

      Didn't the Titan have a 5.0 diesel?