@Max L Literally me, I used to hover around 1300-1350. Watched Daniel and picked up some openings and move evaluation framework. Reached 1550 within a month or so of sporadic play. It's amazing how good of a teacher he is.
Literally gained 300 elo in 6 months by watching Danya. I was stuck at 1600 and am now mid 1900, approaching 2000 day by day. He is a an insanely great teacher.
Spoiler: I love the way that the ediyor didn't put cheater news to the title, so I watched it like an episode of a series and I really appreciate it :)
39:22 And the word of the day is "ensconce". I love that he's both a GM at chess and a GM at English. I can't tell you the last time I heard that word used.
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 Oh yeah, being well-read is all it takes. That's probably the only reason I know that word, probably read something about a king being "ensconced" on a throne in some fantasy novel once (or more). And also my mom decorating the house with candle sconces when I was a kid.
What a game, and as always, handled with class. I like these games where it's about trying to find minor chances out of an equalish opening with an open position.
I'm a new subscriber, and haven't known about you for very long. But I want to commend you, and tell you how much I appreciate the tenacity with which you defend your opponent's honor, even when you *do* suspect cheating; refusing to make (or even entertain) any accusations until you've had time to dig in with the engine. I admire the display of character you show in these scenarios.
That moment at the end of the game where it looked like black might try and go on for a win, but then went for a draw anyways. That's him choosing a slightly different move out of frustration that the engine was repeating moves
Well wouldnt it be hard for him to control the time spent like that since he was playing very good moves almost instantly? If the engine was on a second screen he couldnt move like that, and if it were a bot it'd just move instantly all the time no?
@@GIFT1FROM1THE1GODZ I was following the game on an analysis board with an engine while watching and it would have been totally doable for me to play all the moves that quickly. A lot of the time it was possible to predict what move Danya would make while he paused to explain on stream. I started getting suspicious when he premoved fxe6, was pretty certain it was cheating when he played Nh5, and by the time he played Nf6 was 100% certain.
@@GIFT1FROM1THE1GODZ In addition to the previous comment, if you have the engine calculating the top five (or more) lines, then Danya almost certainly plays one of them and the best response is already visible and can be played almost instantly. Then on Danya's turn you input the previous two moves into the engine and let it churn on his time and the results are ready again by the time Danya makes his next move.
Congrats Danya for drawing this! Even if the game was less analysed, I feel like we learned a lot from watching you play for a draw and trying to find the best moves who gave you chances. The opponent might have been lucky with his moves, which happens. Thanks for the game
You’re too nice to opponents who cheat. As someone in the rating range of your opponent, I could play 1000 games against a grandmaster and not come within spitting distance of a game like that. It is noticeable that the only moves that were inaccurate were the ones where they spent time deciding upon. Every top engine move was made within seconds.
@@Relisimy0001 Look at previous speedruns. 2000 players have never played like this... Also, next speedrun game is also very suspicious, you'll see... Could it be that 2000 players have leveled up or they are just all cheating lol
94% accuracy for SIXTY EIGHT MOVES, playing at move 32 and still playing faster than increment, horsesh__... Never mind losing numerous rapid games with accuracy that's pedestrian at best, Danya is just being a nice guy... This guy was clearly cheating. Just take in the number of times Daniel says the 3 words, "I didn't see..." and you have all the proof you need. One of the fastest players on the planet wasn't quick enough, but this guy was. ....right....
You guys are so bad about this lol. That guy could really easily have just been a smurf and the actual grandmaster playing (who has been known to call people out for cheating when he believes them to be) said he thinks his opponent was playing legitimately. That's not him being "too nice", he just disagrees. He even comments with actual frustration that his chatters think they "know better" than him when it comes to chess moves. I get that you're rated 2000, but I trust the GM a lot more.
Losing to a 1200 is not suspicious of that’s what you are implying, the difference between the 1200 and the 2000 and the 2000 and Danya is roughly the same and the 1200 could have also had a lucky game. There is no ways that a 2000 would be matched up against a 1200 in the pool so it was probably someone playing a friend of theirs and the friends pulled through
@@terroristsnakecat4830 this is just wrong as a 1800 rated player according to the elo system the odds of a 1200 beating me is 0.016%. If this guy lost to a 1200 earlier that pretty much confirms it for me.
@@commanderpanda2550 if you play against a friend you often play less accurate and go for funnier lines. Just because it's boring to just play accurate and defeat your friend, if he is not on your level. I lost some blitz games against my friends where they were 700 points lower rated.
This. I lost to a friend almost a thousand points lower rated than I am because I pointed out his mistakes and let him take moved back by shuffling my pieces around the board, and helped him build an attack. If the match was against a friend it doesn't necessarily mean anything.
I watched as he came into chat. The fact that he knew Frankfurt Airport is your speedrun name shows that there was at least the possibility that he knew who he was playing during the match. So in putting this match into that perspective it does lend to skepticism of his play being legitimate, as opposed to if he had no idea who you were.
Oooohhh so that's why he didn't want to cheat on every move and he instead made sure that he gave away the winning advantage haha. He didn't want to get caught, he was smarter than that Indian billionaire Nikhil Kamath, but still, his cheating was too obvious. Although, again, he did it in a lot smarter way than Nikhil Kamath.
I think it’s clear that he doesn’t cheat normally but I think you’re probably right here. I’ve seen the same on GingerGM’s speedruns. He seems to encounter a disproportionately large percentage of cheats and his account name is GingerGM Speedrun. It seems some players see they’ve been paired with a GM/streamer and decide they need assistance to win, which they probably would. I don’t understand the mentality though. I guess for some people the winning is so much more important than the playing. I would expect most strong players to relish the chance to play someone like Danya and pit their wits against him. I know I would. But then I guess there’s a minority who don’t relish the challenge and decide to try to win by any means available. Such a shame.
I’d love to see another Grunfeld game soon Danya, I know you recommended it against d4. Studying it has been quite difficult for me on my own. As always, I appreciate the value you give to the online chess community.
A few comments: 1) Danya's videos, teaching and attitude are incredible. He's exemplary in the chess community and handles potential cheaters extremely well. 2) There are many different levels of what could be called "rare". Every move changes the odds. Playing 3 best moves in a row might be a 1 in 10 chance for a certain player, for example. But then 6 moves would be a 1 in 100 chance and 9 moves would be 1 in 1000. It all depends on the factors and the odds tend to grow exponentially. Someone playing a pretty good game is one thing. Someone playing 600 points above their ELO sustained for 30 or 40 moves is basically impossible. On the level of 1 in a million million, not just 1 in 10 or 1 in 100. 3) It doesn't matter if the moves can be rationalised afterwards. Anything becomes easier to explain after the fact. The question is whether the player actually came up with them and how plausible it is based on their rating. Again, a 1 in 100 possibility can be given the benefit of the doubt while a 1 in 1,000,000,000,000 is basically proof. 4) Based on this, I'd say this guy cheated. He might be a legit player most of the time, but that doesn't change the fact that he chose to cheat in this game which ruins the game and his reputation. Way too many factors point to cheating - the speed of the moves, the consistent high accuracy, the intuition of Danya (like you're getting squeezed), the unintuitive moves, etc. 5) The pause needn't indicate "thinking", it could also be that they're distracted or had computer issues. 6) Cheaters often turn the engine on and off. So overall accuracy is less significant than long streaks of perfect moves during the game, regardless of a few mistakes.
Agreed. I'm also a Scandi player but when I occasionally beat a titled player online if they check my rare or precise line in the database they will see that I have played that line many times before. This is the first time he had played ...c5 so if anything a lot of his moves should have been played slower than needed not faster than expected ostensibly having confidently thought on Danya's time.
@@blurr1903Yeah cheating isn't an all or nothing thing. I'm sure he was looking at lines and playing a few of his own moves. It was a bizarre game regardless of what the opponent was up to.
Danya is being super charitable here, but as a 2600 GM wouldn’t he pretty much know all of the players by name who can outplay him like this? Also as one of the best online blitz players in the world it seems super suspicious that someone would blitz out moves and surprise Danya with their strength. Seems pretty superhuman to me but impossible to prove anything for sure
Looking at their games, the opponent has reached the position after 5.d4 12 times. They have played 5...c5 exactly once in those 12 games, and that was against Danya.
Danya has to be my favorite GM. Not only does he handle everything with such class but he allows us to watch and learn from him like this for completely free.
Cheating imo. The move where he thought for 2 minutes was a situation where he’s thinking “why can’t I just take the knight and take the pawn?” Then decides he’ll probably win anyway so goes for it despite the computer not recommending it
If you're running moves through a chess bot then why would you wonder for two minutes why a certain move is losing? You have a chess bot right there. Just run the move through the chess bot. For your point to make sense the guy has to think he's smarter than stockfish, which begs the question why he'd be using it in the first place ?
He possibly felt he needed to make a few mistakes not to get banned. It would take time to find a plausible move by experimenting with the engine. The move used was way outside of the suggested moves. imao
The guy has a 1959 puzzle rating with over 3,500 puzzles attempted. I have a 2549 rating on puzzles with 4,200 attempted and am a USCF 1406. Tactically he's much worse than me and no way could I come close to hanging with a GM for 68 moves.
I agree with you that this guy is very likely to be a cheater, but puzzle rating is meaningless and cannot be compared well. I have seen lots of players with high puzzleratings that are tactically weaker than me, because they solve puzzles by investing hours (which doesnt mean this method is bad) if they dont see the idea in a quick time (~3 minutes). I think puzzlerating is only good to compare yourself (if you dont change the way you solve them) so you can see how you improved
Puzzle rating is the most meaningless thing you can find. If you only do puzzles at 5 am it's probably also very low. Just as an example. It tells you nothing about how they would perform in a game.
@@schrodingerskatze4308 This simply isn't true. Danya's opponent used several tactical motifs in the game that almost require a prior study or understanding of the position at a titled player level. If he sucks at doing puzzles, he can't recognize those motifs.
He just looks like a good player. He missed best numerous times and burned 4-5 minutes in the endgame, the same as Danya. Just because someone plays a good game doesn't mean they are cheating
@@IkEisawesome7 he was outplaying a gm, who is 1000 pts above him, without even thinking. After analysis of the game it's pretty clear that he cheated
@@null1700 could be a talented youngster. That's what his profile pic looks like. Also look at his blitz history - he has slowly been grinding from 1000 to 2000.
1900 here so I guess not too far from the current speedrun level. I’ve noticed that around 1900-2000, everyone is still terrible at the endgame. While the middlegame and opening were definitely suspicious, the endgame is what made it for me. Can’t seem to believe that someone just a couple hundred rating above my level would be able to play that endgame so accurately.
I agree. Opening might be some prep if the player prepped this for let's say a tournament. Middle game was suspicious but not impossible, he still let down his advantage. Endgame was insane. I would lose this so fast with black
Yes. Also, my comments always get deleted from his videos even though I have never said anything negative about him. I mostly don't comment on suspicious Speedrun games either.
I don't care what anybody says; the way Danya handles these situations is objectively good. He states when he is suspicious and does not make any allegations unless he has sufficient circumstantial evidence that is probative of foul play. You have to understand that Chess is one of the few games that involve 0 luck; its all about skill. A 2000 rated player drawing a 60 move game against Danya (a grandmaster who's spent his ENTIRE LIFE playing and studying the game, and one of the best bullet players on the platform) with 9 minutes to spare is insanely suspicious. I believe 1 of 3 things is true: (1) he is extremely underrated, (2) his rating is correct and he miraculously found all the right moves immediately and played them with nearly no calculation, or (3) he is a cheater. I choose (3) based off of the other games he has played (ex: he lost to a 1600 today and the accuracy was 69-75) and the engine evaluation. Please don't pay attention to the comments that trash your method of handling "such positions," Danya. They are probably just trolling.
@@sckerz By luck I mean RNG inherent in the game. For example, in Backgammon you roll a dice. The number you roll is completely outside your control. Of course you can "get lucky" and your opponent blunders. But that's not really luck, thats just your opponent misplaying.
@@8hei I am stating that we can only calculate so much. It shouldn't be hard to imagine a situation where you calculate a line 4-5 moves deep and evaluate the position as better, however, you failed to calculate a move or a missed sequence. If you happen to have a move that refutes that potential move or sequence, that would be considered "Luck".
@@Cheorni_6 I am going to reinforce my statement that there is indeed luck in chess at the human level. It may not be "physical" luck that you can see; like a dice roll. However, Imagine for a second 2 beginners playing chess. One of them takes a knight for a protected rook but that knight was protecting a M1 square. The other player does not see the M1 move, rather recaptures the knight and proceeds to lose the game. By my standards, there was luck involved in this game.
Due to people like that and since i don't like bullet or 3/0 blitz, I never play humans online, only against the computers. Thank you for your very instructive videos.
Danya is just so classy his dealing with cheaters is really measured and understanding who knows if this was cheating or not but either way this was an incredibly sharp game and incredible to watch danya play when he’s being really stretched which for 95% of these speed run games he isn’t being stretched this much
I’d guess 99% cheater lol. You’re incredibly generous with your suspicion levels but it does set a good example. Just the other day I had a game against someone my level where the opponent sacrificed a knight immediately for no obvious compensation then quickly began outplaying me. My first instinct was “cheater” but then he started playing garbage moves so I don’t know
ok, that looked like high level, selective cheater to me at least xD 11 Great moves and a brilliancy and up on starting time at the end of a 60 odd move game with 95% accuracy vs a GM xD
I searched up this opponent and found that I have played him once quite some time ago and I lost in like 20 moves. Mind you we're both 1800-2000 at that time and they are playing at 90+% accuracy. I don't want to say anything but I have had this scenarios for quite some time with a few opponents.
i checked his profile, i played him once and I won with 85% accuracy vs his 76% accuracy, blitz game, me (1914) him (1952), quite a normal game. He has thousands of blitz games and quite normal win rate, and average accuracy, i don't understand why he would cheat ocasionally. but at the same time i got cheater vibes from this game, lol.
@@MatsMatsuo That's the point, you don't rampantly cheat but rather occasionally from time to time so that you 'escape' from the system. This is how cheaters stay playing without getting caught.
@@evanenenen maybe, bu i did read in the comments that the guy was most likely aware of Daniel nickname, so he probably new Daniel was recording and decided to show-off “his fishy abilities”, most likely he intended to draw from the start… Still, I don’t get why to cheat ocasionally, he literally gains nothing by doing that, since he’s clearly stuck at 1900-2000 rating
This guy is proof that you can cheat for ages if you do it selectively. His peak puzzle rating is 2349 (currently 1959!) and here he is putting together insane strings of engine moves at breakneck speed, including inhuman moves like fxe6 and dodging the queen trade. He's 1719 bullet so he's a pretty good player, but the cheating is incredibly blatant here.
@@MrGelliantGutfright I know of multiple people who at ~2000 rapid have a 3000+ puzzle rating. 2300 rated puzzles should take 5 seconds max for a player of this calibre
Im 1900 rapid and 3100 puzzle. These tactics did not occur to me at all with the time the opponent took. However, I do not play the scandi and I'm not familiar with these positions. But still, these top engine moves who were really deep ARE NOT easy to find, but it might have been luck. It happens
It is actually quite obvious that the first mistake is made once the opponent starts thinking. So he wants to make the cheating less obvious and choses a move that is not top computer or calculates himself that it is not a complete blunder. But it is a direct outlier to the rest of his play.
Keeping up with Danya is one thing, doing it while making your moves in 15 seconds is ridiculous. Once they got out of “theory” they still made moves extremely quick, relative to the complexity of each decision.
It's funny the moves people are pointing to, I think the most damning is actually 43. ...Ke8 over ...Ke7. The latter being completely natural, and still drawing, the prior being the top engine move, completely unnatural, almost instantly for a slight edge.
1 Brilliant, 6 Great, 40 Best, 10 Excellent, 5 Good, 0 inaccuracy, 1 mistake and barely more than 2 minutes of clock time used against a world class GM. Decode is a fucking legend and deserves to be world champion!!!
It's interesting to hear his thoughts on how likely it is to get 95% accuracy. I've had plenty of 95% accuracy games in bullet and blitz and it's because opponents are moving fast, making mistakes, and falling for opening traps that I've studied and know the automatic answers to. I've had a few 100% games just because the guy fell for the exact opening trap I've learned - it doesn't mean I'm amazing, just that they blundered a lot because they weren't familiar with it. But a long, drawn out, 95% accuracy game in longer time controls vs a very strong opponent who also is playing at 95% is a whole other story.
My rating has been up to 2050 , but anything above 2000 and I suffer from altitude sickness.I mention this to say I thought the game played by this opponent grew gradually more suspect , I think some of the good moves I would have found - avoiding the early Queen exchange , moving the bishop to the long Diagonal , even retreating the knight. Some of the weaker moves Rb2 ? , BxN ? I noticed and hope I would have avoided.But overall the speed and quality of his game , especially endgame -? report the guy with a clear conscience.
same with me, my peak was 2090, usually i'm at 1970-2030, need to study more to improve, I achieved some sort of plato (in blitz). Most of his moves made sense to me, but the endgame was so fast and accurate, like why the hell would you play a rapid game and risk blunder the endgame with 15min on the clock, this guys the fastest 2000 player i've ever seen
he has like 26,691 games on his account, is it possible to be an undetected cheater with such a volume of games? he must be cheating in 1/1000 games or something like that, so I thought that he's just some sort of ultra-expert on the Scandi, because fxe6 is a move that nobody under the super-GM level would consider unless they've checked it with the engine
@@gooffoon Opening stuff like fxe6 I don't consider suspicious. You play that line often you're going to check and add moves as needed. The play entering in to the middle game and on to the end game on the other hand...
This guy clearly used the computer to get a good position and then decided to try and finish off a 2000 rated player on his own as he started taking more time at the end. Selective cheating. Then he didn’t want a draw so he ignored the computer and moved his king away only to see the computer flash one drawing line and a bunch of losing ones. So he took the draw. Plain as day and all too common.
Yea I'm sure this random nobody legitimately makes several key moves that turn out to be strong surprises to a world class GM, all the while spending less time than the increment amount
You don't believe this guy memorised every possible line in Scandinavian? I looked through that profile and he had some great games but in general he plays much worse, something is certainly off here
i wouldnt rule out substance use im on an edible and instead of really feeling high maybe this is just more possible from seeing your perspective and not actively being in the game but I was finding a lot of blacks moves and it weirdly just becomes an intuitive math game that i cant explain why i was as accurate as i was, actually that might be what makes chess so hard damn
Feels to me like the guy doesn't normally cheat but he did in this game. Except for that one move that took him 2 minutes. Maybe he recognized Danya's account and wanted to win.
Danya says it's only statistically unlikely that a 2000 beats a 2600 in a 15 minute game and it's only suspicious. But didn't it happen 3 times in a row? that's gotta be super-mega-suspicious. And it's always people with perfect opening theory in obscure lines. Keep in mind that Danya didn't play bad neither. 94% accuracy is not bad. Maybe people have found a new way to cheat in the opening and not get caught. or maybe 2000 is the new 2600. I don't know.
Nah, you're just seeing the influence of Chessable courses. This opponent was suspicious, but the last few with the opening prep weren't surprising at all. Danya isn't even actively studying the openings he recommends yet the lines are all in the courses. In fact, the Jobava game with Qe8 was straight counter prep against Danya's own course. Part of Danya's problem is that he plays so accurately that he's walking right into deep course lines. Far less of these games have been cheaters than what RUclips commenter would have you believe, but this game in particular was kind of suspect because of how little time the opponent used in the middle game.
@@mcbomb7447 massive difference between prep and cheating. Prep is obvious to spot. Quick accurate moves in an important line. Ludicrous moves like Nh5 and ke8 and Nd4 and Be8 however are way too deep to be prep especially for a 2000 in under 10 seconds for each move. In that case the preping is taking place during the game.
I really want to see Danya playing against the 3200 engine and then together with us viewers, try to explore how it outplayed us and what we can learn from it.
It was a bunch of pretty natural moves that weren’t that great at times and in the endgame it was not a position that black could lose in really so accuracy is a lot easier to achieve
@Terrorist Snake cat they made a lot of best moves almost instantly. No one moves that quickly and plays that powerfully at 2000 elo. They knew Danya's username, they knew they were on stream. They chose a draw to avoid further suspicion. It is clear to me they turned off their engine at some point later in the game. fxe6 and Nh5 are nowhere near natural. This person selectively used an engine and turned it off at some point.
@@OblivionEightI don’t think they turned it off. Probably just did not leave it running long enough in the rook endgame (you have to run engines longer if you want to find the winning lines in almost drawn endgame positions)
Play longer games and actually look at your games that you're playing. It's easier to find the moves Danya talks about because he outlines his plans and ideas so that you are being told what the weaknesses are in his games. The issue could be that when you're playing, you aren't looking for yours or your opponents weaknesses or what ideas/plans you have i.e. backwards or isolated pawns to target. Danya's videos are great because he lays out the carpet for you to walk on and find the moves to help the plan he's set in motion. You just have to do that yourself now.
If you sort his games by first game played, he started off at 900 elo 2 years ago, lost 2 games, then went on a winning streak of about 25 games with 95% accuracy. Definitely a cheater.
I think Danya should start playing speedruns offline, because there are a lot of streamsnipers, cheaters and smurfs who wants to test themselves against Danya with deep opening preparation knowing which lines he is playing in the speedrun
Given the time spent on top engine moves this is obviously a cheater. Love the way Daniel handles this with class and the editor for not putting up a “broken glass” thumbnail, keeps the tension for the viewer
If it was a pet line, the C5 and FxE6 pawn moves are early enough to be prep, I would think. But my ELO is waaaay too low to comment with any authority.
For this opening I do something similar but different. 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. Bb5+ Bd7 4. Bc4 basically forcing black to expend more tempi or another pawn to get the nasty d5 pawn out of their doorway.
I find the Ke8 move far more suspicious than the Nf6, because, to me, as a bad chess player, I'd move Nf6 there, too. But I'd do it for all the wrong reasons... mainly just because it felt very loose and out of play on the rim and I wouldn't have been considering Nf4 in that position.
My updated vocab list I've learned from watching Danya's videos:
Ensconce
Circumspect
Convoluted
Endemic
Gradation
Revulsion
Enthralled
Phalanx
Conflating
Myopic
Scant
Crux
Excoriate
Peeve
Foible
Obviate
Predilection
Antediluvian
Vocab rating: 3200 elo
My favourite was "antediluvian". The only place I'd only ever heard of it before was in Vampire: the Masquerade!
Haha
@@drunkenhobo8020 any chance you remember which video you heard it??
@@liljackypaper Had a look through my comment history, as I remember remarking on it. It's on "What is a Pillsbury Knight??" at around 57:10.
@@drunkenhobo8020 wow you're the man! 👊
Now every time my opponent goes into the tank, I think they're just explaining to chat how they're about to kick my ass. Thanks Danya
Me too. Eventually, I ask in chat if I'm being streamed.
genuinely gained hundreds of elo from watching these speedruns thank you so much danya
Ialso gained, I am comfortably in the 1500s now for months when I was stuck at 1300 a few years ago , I attribute a lot of this to his videos.
@Max L Literally me, I used to hover around 1300-1350. Watched Daniel and picked up some openings and move evaluation framework. Reached 1550 within a month or so of sporadic play. It's amazing how good of a teacher he is.
Literally gained 300 elo in 6 months by watching Danya. I was stuck at 1600 and am now mid 1900, approaching 2000 day by day. He is a an insanely great teacher.
How do you guys remember the theory he goes over in his vids I just forget
@@imback9379smoke less weed
GM Naroditsky: keeping up his dignity against a-holes since 1995.
😂
Spoiler:
I love the way that the ediyor didn't put cheater news to the title, so I watched it like an episode of a series and I really appreciate it :)
I agree
I love that you add spoiler warning
@@erenyeager591 I love you that you love him
Not a proven cheater though, several year old account plus still active and playing games today.
@@AvocadoTheBugCat If you go to the opponent's profile, he drew a game against an account that was closed for fair play. Very suspicious
39:22 And the word of the day is "ensconce". I love that he's both a GM at chess and a GM at English. I can't tell you the last time I heard that word used.
He clearly has a high IQ and reads a lot.
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 Oh yeah, being well-read is all it takes. That's probably the only reason I know that word, probably read something about a king being "ensconced" on a throne in some fantasy novel once (or more). And also my mom decorating the house with candle sconces when I was a kid.
Where do you live? I had a cranberry ensconce with my coffee this morning...got it from the coffee shop down the street.
It's just a language, chill.
I use only desultorily and episodically use the word ensconce.
What a game, and as always, handled with class. I like these games where it's about trying to find minor chances out of an equalish opening with an open position.
Danyas diplomatic way of saying he thinks opponent might be cheating "I'm getting that hopeless feeling"
I'm a new subscriber, and haven't known about you for very long. But I want to commend you, and tell you how much I appreciate the tenacity with which you defend your opponent's honor, even when you *do* suspect cheating; refusing to make (or even entertain) any accusations until you've had time to dig in with the engine. I admire the display of character you show in these scenarios.
That moment at the end of the game where it looked like black might try and go on for a win, but then went for a draw anyways. That's him choosing a slightly different move out of frustration that the engine was repeating moves
THIS
A cheetah? I just started watching.
Well wouldnt it be hard for him to control the time spent like that since he was playing very good moves almost instantly?
If the engine was on a second screen he couldnt move like that, and if it were a bot it'd just move instantly all the time no?
@@GIFT1FROM1THE1GODZ I was following the game on an analysis board with an engine while watching and it would have been totally doable for me to play all the moves that quickly. A lot of the time it was possible to predict what move Danya would make while he paused to explain on stream. I started getting suspicious when he premoved fxe6, was pretty certain it was cheating when he played Nh5, and by the time he played Nf6 was 100% certain.
@@GIFT1FROM1THE1GODZ In addition to the previous comment, if you have the engine calculating the top five (or more) lines, then Danya almost certainly plays one of them and the best response is already visible and can be played almost instantly. Then on Danya's turn you input the previous two moves into the engine and let it churn on his time and the results are ready again by the time Danya makes his next move.
Congrats Danya for drawing this! Even if the game was less analysed, I feel like we learned a lot from watching you play for a draw and trying to find the best moves who gave you chances.
The opponent might have been lucky with his moves, which happens.
Thanks for the game
You’re too nice to opponents who cheat. As someone in the rating range of your opponent, I could play 1000 games against a grandmaster and not come within spitting distance of a game like that. It is noticeable that the only moves that were inaccurate were the ones where they spent time deciding upon. Every top engine move was made within seconds.
yeah. he defintley cheating. a 2000 beating a grandmaster while playing very fast. that dont happen
@@Relisimy0001 Look at previous speedruns. 2000 players have never played like this... Also, next speedrun game is also very suspicious, you'll see...
Could it be that 2000 players have leveled up or they are just all cheating lol
94% accuracy for SIXTY EIGHT MOVES, playing at move 32 and still playing faster than increment, horsesh__... Never mind losing numerous rapid games with accuracy that's pedestrian at best, Danya is just being a nice guy... This guy was clearly cheating.
Just take in the number of times Daniel says the 3 words, "I didn't see..." and you have all the proof you need. One of the fastest players on the planet wasn't quick enough, but this guy was.
....right....
thank you. Facts
You guys are so bad about this lol. That guy could really easily have just been a smurf and the actual grandmaster playing (who has been known to call people out for cheating when he believes them to be) said he thinks his opponent was playing legitimately. That's not him being "too nice", he just disagrees. He even comments with actual frustration that his chatters think they "know better" than him when it comes to chess moves. I get that you're rated 2000, but I trust the GM a lot more.
Same guy who lost to a 1200 earlier today absolutely found the sauce against Danya...
Losing to a 1200 is not suspicious of that’s what you are implying, the difference between the 1200 and the 2000 and the 2000 and Danya is roughly the same and the 1200 could have also had a lucky game. There is no ways that a 2000 would be matched up against a 1200 in the pool so it was probably someone playing a friend of theirs and the friends pulled through
@@terroristsnakecat4830 this is just wrong as a 1800 rated player according to the elo system the odds of a 1200 beating me is 0.016%. If this guy lost to a 1200 earlier that pretty much confirms it for me.
@@commanderpanda2550 if you play against a friend you often play less accurate and go for funnier lines. Just because it's boring to just play accurate and defeat your friend, if he is not on your level. I lost some blitz games against my friends where they were 700 points lower rated.
This. I lost to a friend almost a thousand points lower rated than I am because I pointed out his mistakes and let him take moved back by shuffling my pieces around the board, and helped him build an attack. If the match was against a friend it doesn't necessarily mean anything.
@@commanderpanda2550 600 point difference is a 3% chance, not 0.016%.
5:56 one of the voice cracks of our time
😂😂😂😂
Who let the dogs out?
This has no rights to be so funny
lmaoooo that was a good one
5:58 is the exact moment of the voice crack, converted to seconds it's 358s.
There's a 358 at the beginning of this video's link.
Coincidence?
I watched as he came into chat. The fact that he knew Frankfurt Airport is your speedrun name shows that there was at least the possibility that he knew who he was playing during the match. So in putting this match into that perspective it does lend to skepticism of his play being legitimate, as opposed to if he had no idea who you were.
I feel like all players he faces recently know what they are dealing with. Is is that easy to stream snipe?
Oooohhh so that's why he didn't want to cheat on every move and he instead made sure that he gave away the winning advantage haha. He didn't want to get caught, he was smarter than that Indian billionaire Nikhil Kamath, but still, his cheating was too obvious. Although, again, he did it in a lot smarter way than Nikhil Kamath.
I think it’s clear that he doesn’t cheat normally but I think you’re probably right here. I’ve seen the same on GingerGM’s speedruns. He seems to encounter a disproportionately large percentage of cheats and his account name is GingerGM Speedrun. It seems some players see they’ve been paired with a GM/streamer and decide they need assistance to win, which they probably would. I don’t understand the mentality though. I guess for some people the winning is so much more important than the playing. I would expect most strong players to relish the chance to play someone like Danya and pit their wits against him. I know I would. But then I guess there’s a minority who don’t relish the challenge and decide to try to win by any means available. Such a shame.
In about 1/3 of these videos Danya says "1/500 games I will be outplayed, it's not that crazy".
He's getting outplayed a lot recently
@@isura.mits too easy to cheat is why
@@isura.m he played at 95 accuracy, is it really fair to say he is getting outplayed?
@@samwightman6434 Well, he was obviously outplayed at several moments in this game
@@samwightman6434 Danya is the one who said that he is getting out played. He probably meant at certain moments.
When the opponent plays a lot of "immediate consternation" moves and still has 15 mins
I’d love to see another Grunfeld game soon Danya, I know you recommended it against d4. Studying it has been quite difficult for me on my own. As always, I appreciate the value you give to the online chess community.
A few comments:
1) Danya's videos, teaching and attitude are incredible. He's exemplary in the chess community and handles potential cheaters extremely well.
2) There are many different levels of what could be called "rare". Every move changes the odds. Playing 3 best moves in a row might be a 1 in 10 chance for a certain player, for example. But then 6 moves would be a 1 in 100 chance and 9 moves would be 1 in 1000. It all depends on the factors and the odds tend to grow exponentially. Someone playing a pretty good game is one thing. Someone playing 600 points above their ELO sustained for 30 or 40 moves is basically impossible. On the level of 1 in a million million, not just 1 in 10 or 1 in 100.
3) It doesn't matter if the moves can be rationalised afterwards. Anything becomes easier to explain after the fact. The question is whether the player actually came up with them and how plausible it is based on their rating. Again, a 1 in 100 possibility can be given the benefit of the doubt while a 1 in 1,000,000,000,000 is basically proof.
4) Based on this, I'd say this guy cheated. He might be a legit player most of the time, but that doesn't change the fact that he chose to cheat in this game which ruins the game and his reputation. Way too many factors point to cheating - the speed of the moves, the consistent high accuracy, the intuition of Danya (like you're getting squeezed), the unintuitive moves, etc.
5) The pause needn't indicate "thinking", it could also be that they're distracted or had computer issues.
6) Cheaters often turn the engine on and off. So overall accuracy is less significant than long streaks of perfect moves during the game, regardless of a few mistakes.
Agreed. I'm also a Scandi player but when I occasionally beat a titled player online if they check my rare or precise line in the database they will see that I have played that line many times before. This is the first time he had played ...c5 so if anything a lot of his moves should have been played slower than needed not faster than expected ostensibly having confidently thought on Danya's time.
A draw against Stockfish is a remarkable result
not really, it's a legit game.
@@YourShorts_guy no way it's legit, this guy was definitely cheating
@@behavior2836he would have won of he was cheating
@@someone-jl4sjobviously wasn’t cheating the whole game
@@blurr1903Yeah cheating isn't an all or nothing thing. I'm sure he was looking at lines and playing a few of his own moves. It was a bizarre game regardless of what the opponent was up to.
Danya is being super charitable here, but as a 2600 GM wouldn’t he pretty much know all of the players by name who can outplay him like this? Also as one of the best online blitz players in the world it seems super suspicious that someone would blitz out moves and surprise Danya with their strength. Seems pretty superhuman to me but impossible to prove anything for sure
Agreed, that opening is not a theoretical line and it wasn’t in the opponents database. He blitzed out super impressive moves very quickly
Looking at their games, the opponent has reached the position after 5.d4 12 times. They have played 5...c5 exactly once in those 12 games, and that was against Danya.
Danya has to be my favorite GM. Not only does he handle everything with such class but he allows us to watch and learn from him like this for completely free.
Cheating imo. The move where he thought for 2 minutes was a situation where he’s thinking “why can’t I just take the knight and take the pawn?” Then decides he’ll probably win anyway so goes for it despite the computer not recommending it
Lol, what are you even saying
@henriquezuiani4235 English not your first language??
If you're running moves through a chess bot then why would you wonder for two minutes why a certain move is losing? You have a chess bot right there. Just run the move through the chess bot.
For your point to make sense the guy has to think he's smarter than stockfish, which begs the question why he'd be using it in the first place ?
He possibly felt he needed to make a few mistakes not to get banned. It would take time to find a plausible move by experimenting with the engine. The move used was way outside of the suggested moves. imao
The guy has a 1959 puzzle rating with over 3,500 puzzles attempted. I have a 2549 rating on puzzles with 4,200 attempted and am a USCF 1406. Tactically he's much worse than me and no way could I come close to hanging with a GM for 68 moves.
I agree with you that this guy is very likely to be a cheater, but puzzle rating is meaningless and cannot be compared well. I have seen lots of players with high puzzleratings that are tactically weaker than me, because they solve puzzles by investing hours (which doesnt mean this method is bad) if they dont see the idea in a quick time (~3 minutes). I think puzzlerating is only good to compare yourself (if you dont change the way you solve them) so you can see how you improved
Puzzle rating is the most meaningless thing you can find. If you only do puzzles at 5 am it's probably also very low. Just as an example. It tells you nothing about how they would perform in a game.
@@schrodingerskatze4308 This simply isn't true. Danya's opponent used several tactical motifs in the game that almost require a prior study or understanding of the position at a titled player level. If he sucks at doing puzzles, he can't recognize those motifs.
I'm 1900 ecf and 2000 puzzles, it's not a good metric.
Clearly a cheater
Love the speed run Danya!!! Look forward to your videos daily
Thank you danya for all of the videos. You have helped me love the game of chess, and improve a lot!
He played a complex end game in a matter of minutes. Each serious move in the end game took about 7 seconds. That is extremely suspicious.
Also only played inaccurate moves when he thought for himself.
He just looks like a good player. He missed best numerous times and burned 4-5 minutes in the endgame, the same as Danya. Just because someone plays a good game doesn't mean they are cheating
And the account plays every day basically, has had the account since 2020. What a ridiculous hackusation lol
@@IkEisawesome7 he was outplaying a gm, who is 1000 pts above him, without even thinking. After analysis of the game it's pretty clear that he cheated
@@null1700 could be a talented youngster. That's what his profile pic looks like. Also look at his blitz history - he has slowly been grinding from 1000 to 2000.
1900 here so I guess not too far from the current speedrun level. I’ve noticed that around 1900-2000, everyone is still terrible at the endgame. While the middlegame and opening were definitely suspicious, the endgame is what made it for me. Can’t seem to believe that someone just a couple hundred rating above my level would be able to play that endgame so accurately.
Yeah im 2000 rapid and wouldve lost rook and pawn endgame
Same level and I totally agree.
I agree. Opening might be some prep if the player prepped this for let's say a tournament. Middle game was suspicious but not impossible, he still let down his advantage. Endgame was insane. I would lose this so fast with black
Me as well.
I am 1700, i think i play middle game like 18-1900 and endgame like a 1200 lol
The "terrible" 94.3% accuracy game... I bet my right kidney, the opponent cheated...
thank you for these great insightful tutorial videos, Daniel!
Classy Danya, always measured and without ego. Inspirational
"This has been a very humbling experience for me" bless him
Stock fish will be like that
Stopped shooting for a checkmate and have been gaining ELO. Loving chess right now.
Once you stop trying to go for scholars mate in every game you really start to learn fast.
@@fvhaudsilhvdfs why are you talking like an anime character
@@fvhaudsilhvdfs Cringe af. And that statement screams «I’m not good at chess»
@@fvhaudsilhvdfs You're 100 percent 600
This whole game gave me so much anxiety but I loved how you handled it.
just got to 1300 watching your games and analysis. thanks for all your content!!
When I realize the opponent is cheating, I know it discourages Danya, but I actually enjoy watching it because I know he still stands a chance.
depends on how they're cheating. no one in the world stands a chance against the top engine moves, even on a browser
Yes. Also, my comments always get deleted from his videos even though I have never said anything negative about him. I mostly don't comment on suspicious Speedrun games either.
@@DipsAndPushups its youtube's fault unfortunately. They seem to be randomly deleting comments
@@Amoeba_Podre They always delete my comments on Naroditsky's videos. And I like the guy I am never negative in the comments
@@DipsAndPushups riiiiight
I don't care what anybody says; the way Danya handles these situations is objectively good. He states when he is suspicious and does not make any allegations unless he has sufficient circumstantial evidence that is probative of foul play. You have to understand that Chess is one of the few games that involve 0 luck; its all about skill. A 2000 rated player drawing a 60 move game against Danya (a grandmaster who's spent his ENTIRE LIFE playing and studying the game, and one of the best bullet players on the platform) with 9 minutes to spare is insanely suspicious. I believe 1 of 3 things is true: (1) he is extremely underrated, (2) his rating is correct and he miraculously found all the right moves immediately and played them with nearly no calculation, or (3) he is a cheater. I choose (3) based off of the other games he has played (ex: he lost to a 1600 today and the accuracy was 69-75) and the engine evaluation.
Please don't pay attention to the comments that trash your method of handling "such positions," Danya. They are probably just trolling.
imagine thinking there is no luck in chess, there is obvious luck in chess at the human level
@@sckerz By luck I mean RNG inherent in the game. For example, in Backgammon you roll a dice. The number you roll is completely outside your control. Of course you can "get lucky" and your opponent blunders. But that's not really luck, thats just your opponent misplaying.
@@sckerz Do you have any arguments or are you just posturing
@@8hei I am stating that we can only calculate so much. It shouldn't be hard to imagine a situation where you calculate a line 4-5 moves deep and evaluate the position as better, however, you failed to calculate a move or a missed sequence. If you happen to have a move that refutes that potential move or sequence, that would be considered "Luck".
@@Cheorni_6 I am going to reinforce my statement that there is indeed luck in chess at the human level. It may not be "physical" luck that you can see; like a dice roll. However, Imagine for a second 2 beginners playing chess. One of them takes a knight for a protected rook but that knight was protecting a M1 square. The other player does not see the M1 move, rather recaptures the knight and proceeds to lose the game. By my standards, there was luck involved in this game.
Due to people like that and since i don't like bullet or 3/0 blitz, I never play humans online, only against the computers. Thank you for your very instructive videos.
I wish we got to see the part where Decode comes on the chat to say that he's only played d5 and danya busted him for never having c5 once before
Wait did that really happen on stream?
@@Slobbbb yeah, he came on a day or so after towards the end of another speedrun game
well, that seals it for me. at least a selective cheater. was fun to watch tho ig...
Would love to see a clip for it
Danya is just so classy his dealing with cheaters is really measured and understanding who knows if this was cheating or not but either way this was an incredibly sharp game and incredible to watch danya play when he’s being really stretched which for 95% of these speed run games he isn’t being stretched this much
This was a solid game!!!!! Very strategic fight for a Draw.
daniel vs stockfish | a series
I’d guess 99% cheater lol. You’re incredibly generous with your suspicion levels but it does set a good example. Just the other day I had a game against someone my level where the opponent sacrificed a knight immediately for no obvious compensation then quickly began outplaying me. My first instinct was “cheater” but then he started playing garbage moves so I don’t know
Could've been a Halloween / Muzio gambit. Those lines aren't sound, but they are very tricky.
He decided to take over the end game to see if, in a computer assisted position, he could close out who he thought was a 2000 elo player on his own.
Sounds like he played a gambit but came unstuck when his opening theory ended.
I am 1700 and sometimes in blitz games some opponents sac a bishop or knight on F7 and I somehow manage to F up too many times lol. it's tricky
ok, that looked like high level, selective cheater to me at least xD 11 Great moves and a brilliancy and up on starting time at the end of a 60 odd move game with 95% accuracy vs a GM xD
I think exactly the same ;)
judging from Decodes past matches when he plays by himself his accuracy is 70-80%
'Selective cheater'. The phrase I've been looking for. These are the worst kind. If there can be a worst kind...
@@danjeory3659 yea they like to play next to engine
Dont judge me but I think its good way to learn because you Analyse the game immediately
@@nthwied1164 doing something that could get you banned from competitive chess is counterintuitive to trying to get good at chess.
I searched up this opponent and found that I have played him once quite some time ago and I lost in like 20 moves. Mind you we're both 1800-2000 at that time and they are playing at 90+% accuracy. I don't want to say anything but I have had this scenarios for quite some time with a few opponents.
i checked his profile, i played him once and I won with 85% accuracy vs his 76% accuracy, blitz game, me (1914) him (1952), quite a normal game. He has thousands of blitz games and quite normal win rate, and average accuracy, i don't understand why he would cheat ocasionally. but at the same time i got cheater vibes from this game, lol.
@@MatsMatsuo That's the point, you don't rampantly cheat but rather occasionally from time to time so that you 'escape' from the system. This is how cheaters stay playing without getting caught.
@@evanenenen maybe, bu i did read in the comments that the guy was most likely aware of Daniel nickname, so he probably new Daniel was recording and decided to show-off “his fishy abilities”, most likely he intended to draw from the start…
Still, I don’t get why to cheat ocasionally, he literally gains nothing by doing that, since he’s clearly stuck at 1900-2000 rating
This guy is proof that you can cheat for ages if you do it selectively. His peak puzzle rating is 2349 (currently 1959!) and here he is putting together insane strings of engine moves at breakneck speed, including inhuman moves like fxe6 and dodging the queen trade. He's 1719 bullet so he's a pretty good player, but the cheating is incredibly blatant here.
I looked at his profile and the puzzle rating jumped out at me too. I would have expected a much higher rating based on this video, put it that way.
fxe6 is theory and OF COURSE with the much safer King, he avoids the Queen trade. He may be cheating, but not for the reasons you give.
@@MrGelliantGutfright I know of multiple people who at ~2000 rapid have a 3000+ puzzle rating. 2300 rated puzzles should take 5 seconds max for a player of this calibre
Im 1900 rapid and 3100 puzzle. These tactics did not occur to me at all with the time the opponent took.
However, I do not play the scandi and I'm not familiar with these positions.
But still, these top engine moves who were really deep ARE NOT easy to find, but it might have been luck. It happens
Fxe6 is just theory though I play this line at 1600 and know that move
Interesting time usage and accuracy at 94%~ from Mr. Decode
Decode, what we are attempting to apply to his gameplay.
It is actually quite obvious that the first mistake is made once the opponent starts thinking. So he wants to make the cheating less obvious and choses a move that is not top computer or calculates himself that it is not a complete blunder. But it is a direct outlier to the rest of his play.
Danya displays pure class and that's one of main things to take away from this pairing.
congrats on the domineering warriors victory today! watched it live at the gym between sets, excellent comeback into domination.
Klay ftw
Awesome video, loved the inclusion of a counter not widely known.
At 30:17 why didn't the black pawn take the white one with an attack on the rook, someone please explain
Rook a8 mate
It's always funny to hear someone younger than you say "back in my day"
Whats a 'warrior score'?
Keeping up with Danya is one thing, doing it while making your moves in 15 seconds is ridiculous. Once they got out of “theory” they still made moves extremely quick, relative to the complexity of each decision.
This speedrun has been so helpful for me. I went from 2051 elo to 2053 and i wont stop here 🔥
It's funny the moves people are pointing to, I think the most damning is actually 43. ...Ke8 over ...Ke7. The latter being completely natural, and still drawing, the prior being the top engine move, completely unnatural, almost instantly for a slight edge.
Ikr this move was crazy to me, to play that move in such short time as well is just crazy
This is easily the best part of my day :)
"I dont really know much about chess and people so if you think you know better, you know better" - Daniel Nariditsky
1 Brilliant, 6 Great, 40 Best, 10 Excellent, 5 Good, 0 inaccuracy, 1 mistake and barely more than 2 minutes of clock time used against a world class GM. Decode is a fucking legend and deserves to be world champion!!!
it's quite awesome that he would not just blatantly say that he's cheating, etc =) truly honorable from him and shows also why he is where he is.
I don't understand "white should be better here" at 11:55? White has an f pawn instead of an e pawn, it's clearly worse? Stockfish says -1.1
1.e4 d5 2.ed Nf6 I think was named for Marschell
It's interesting to hear his thoughts on how likely it is to get 95% accuracy. I've had plenty of 95% accuracy games in bullet and blitz and it's because opponents are moving fast, making mistakes, and falling for opening traps that I've studied and know the automatic answers to. I've had a few 100% games just because the guy fell for the exact opening trap I've learned - it doesn't mean I'm amazing, just that they blundered a lot because they weren't familiar with it. But a long, drawn out, 95% accuracy game in longer time controls vs a very strong opponent who also is playing at 95% is a whole other story.
Yeah but how many 95% games have you had with over 120 moves? It gets way harder the futher out of theory you are imo.
@@TheYellowGreenbean Depends on what it is, drawn out rook endgame for example it's easy to get high accuracy if how you got there was logical!
Haha I like how you say how could someone play this fast and this good as if you weren't one of the best blitz and bullet players on the planet.
that's just another reason to not buy opponent's play. not even Danya could find most of the moves black was blitzing out in such little time.
Ke8 in 15 seconds gives it away here 🤖🤖🤖
Yup
My rating has been up to 2050 , but anything above 2000 and I suffer from altitude sickness.I mention this to say I thought the game played by this opponent grew gradually more suspect , I think some of the good moves I would have found - avoiding the early Queen exchange , moving the bishop to the long Diagonal , even retreating the knight. Some of the weaker moves Rb2 ? , BxN ? I noticed and hope I would have avoided.But overall the speed and quality of his game , especially endgame -? report the guy with a clear conscience.
same with me, my peak was 2090, usually i'm at 1970-2030, need to study more to improve, I achieved some sort of plato (in blitz).
Most of his moves made sense to me, but the endgame was so fast and accurate, like why the hell would you play a rapid game and risk blunder the endgame with 15min on the clock, this guys the fastest 2000 player i've ever seen
Spoiler for video: Im 2-2 vs this guy. He cheated lol I’m utterly trash compared to Danya
so does he cheat from time to time? perhaps he recognized danyas account and cheated as a prank?
he has like 26,691 games on his account, is it possible to be an undetected cheater with such a volume of games? he must be cheating in 1/1000 games or something like that, so I thought that he's just some sort of ultra-expert on the Scandi, because fxe6 is a move that nobody under the super-GM level would consider unless they've checked it with the engine
He is playing end game better than Magnus while spending 5 seconds per move. Gtfo
@@gooffoon He is most likely just a normal 2000 that decided to cheat when he saw he was playing against danya.
@@gooffoon Opening stuff like fxe6 I don't consider suspicious. You play that line often you're going to check and add moves as needed. The play entering in to the middle game and on to the end game on the other hand...
34:40 True, sometimes it feels like streamer GMs insinuate cheating so many times, that when it happens it’s met with suspicion
9:51 What’s wrong with Ne5 here?
That simply blunders a knight
@@vector_747Bxh5 is the idea and if Nxc4, Qe2 and perhaps sufficient compensation for the pawn
In the rook endgame why did Danya let go of the h2 pawn instead of playing h4. Did I miss a tactic? Or king activity?
This guy clearly used the computer to get a good position and then decided to try and finish off a 2000 rated player on his own as he started taking more time at the end. Selective cheating. Then he didn’t want a draw so he ignored the computer and moved his king away only to see the computer flash one drawing line and a bunch of losing ones. So he took the draw. Plain as day and all too common.
What a lazy schmuck, using the engine to avoid learning openings.
Yea I'm sure this random nobody legitimately makes several key moves that turn out to be strong surprises to a world class GM, all the while spending less time than the increment amount
This random guy just selectively chose engine moves to see as legit
You don't believe this guy memorised every possible line in Scandinavian? I looked through that profile and he had some great games but in general he plays much worse, something is certainly off here
@@mariuszpudzianowski8400 that is not likely
@@yessir6427 I know, I was joking. Were clearly a selective cheater.
If you don't realize he's talking to Twitch chat he comes across as a crazy person!
i wouldnt rule out substance use im on an edible and instead of really feeling high maybe this is just more possible from seeing your perspective and not actively being in the game but I was finding a lot of blacks moves and it weirdly just becomes an intuitive math game that i cant explain why i was as accurate as i was, actually that might be what makes chess so hard damn
13:59 says a top 3 bullet player lol
He is fighting against silicone
The key is that in bullet it’s better to play fast than well
Feels to me like the guy doesn't normally cheat but he did in this game. Except for that one move that took him 2 minutes.
Maybe he recognized Danya's account and wanted to win.
honestly i'm literally going to now copy black's opening prep. i'm pretty sure unlike danya me or people at my level would never hold against it
Danya says it's only statistically unlikely that a 2000 beats a 2600 in a 15 minute game and it's only suspicious. But didn't it happen 3 times in a row? that's gotta be super-mega-suspicious.
And it's always people with perfect opening theory in obscure lines. Keep in mind that Danya didn't play bad neither. 94% accuracy is not bad.
Maybe people have found a new way to cheat in the opening and not get caught. or maybe 2000 is the new 2600. I don't know.
Nah, you're just seeing the influence of Chessable courses. This opponent was suspicious, but the last few with the opening prep weren't surprising at all. Danya isn't even actively studying the openings he recommends yet the lines are all in the courses.
In fact, the Jobava game with Qe8 was straight counter prep against Danya's own course. Part of Danya's problem is that he plays so accurately that he's walking right into deep course lines.
Far less of these games have been cheaters than what RUclips commenter would have you believe, but this game in particular was kind of suspect because of how little time the opponent used in the middle game.
@@mcbomb7447 massive difference between prep and cheating. Prep is obvious to spot. Quick accurate moves in an important line. Ludicrous moves like Nh5 and ke8 and Nd4 and Be8 however are way too deep to be prep especially for a 2000 in under 10 seconds for each move. In that case the preping is taking place during the game.
I really want to see Danya playing against the 3200 engine and then together with us viewers, try to explore how it outplayed us and what we can learn from it.
And in december of 2023, the honorable opponent's rapid rating fell to 1871, and he hasn't played since.
Yeah. Dude draws a GM and then drops 150 points. Definitely a cheater
That was a good game. I always want to play the Scandi but don't want positions like that lol
I vote for cheater. The two red flags are the quickness of the moves, as well as the accuracy of the endgame play.
It was a bunch of pretty natural moves that weren’t that great at times and in the endgame it was not a position that black could lose in really so accuracy is a lot easier to achieve
@Terrorist Snake cat they made a lot of best moves almost instantly. No one moves that quickly and plays that powerfully at 2000 elo. They knew Danya's username, they knew they were on stream. They chose a draw to avoid further suspicion. It is clear to me they turned off their engine at some point later in the game. fxe6 and Nh5 are nowhere near natural. This person selectively used an engine and turned it off at some point.
@@OblivionEightI don’t think they turned it off. Probably just did not leave it running long enough in the rook endgame (you have to run engines longer if you want to find the winning lines in almost drawn endgame positions)
Good thumbnail for this kind of opponent
If I had to guess, I'd say the other guy was using an engine for the better part of the game, and then started mixing in some of his own moves.
It’s really not obvious is the opponent cheating or not. Very instructive game btw, keep it up!
I could imagine someone playing those moves, but show me someone who could play those moves while spending near zero clock?
2024 August and he’s still not banned and he’s a platinum member. Awesome!
Bro I'm stuck a lot of time I can keep up and finds the moves but can't progress in real games any advice?
Ask more specific questions.
Play longer games and actually look at your games that you're playing. It's easier to find the moves Danya talks about because he outlines his plans and ideas so that you are being told what the weaknesses are in his games. The issue could be that when you're playing, you aren't looking for yours or your opponents weaknesses or what ideas/plans you have i.e. backwards or isolated pawns to target. Danya's videos are great because he lays out the carpet for you to walk on and find the moves to help the plan he's set in motion. You just have to do that yourself now.
You know the analysis is bugged when it said that both Naroditsky and the cheated played like a 1400.
If you sort his games by first game played, he started off at 900 elo 2 years ago, lost 2 games, then went on a winning streak of about 25 games with 95% accuracy. Definitely a cheater.
Why hasn't he been banned 🤔
After 25 wins in a row I'd think the algorithm would flag him as suspicious.
I think Danya should start playing speedruns offline, because there are a lot of streamsnipers, cheaters and smurfs who wants to test themselves against Danya with deep opening preparation knowing which lines he is playing in the speedrun
Given the time spent on top engine moves this is obviously a cheater. Love the way Daniel handles this with class and the editor for not putting up a “broken glass” thumbnail, keeps the tension for the viewer
If it was a pet line, the C5 and FxE6 pawn moves are early enough to be prep, I would think. But my ELO is waaaay too low to comment with any authority.
I looked up their games and they've reached the position after 5.d4 12 times. This is the only time in those 12 games that they've played 5...c5.
Ke8 over ke7 was crazy though
@@bilalhussain1923 oh absolutely! That move really stands out.
I reallly want to see another grunfeld defense or at least to go more in depth in the strategy because i havent felt confident playing
For this opening I do something similar but different. 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. Bb5+ Bd7 4. Bc4 basically forcing black to expend more tempi or another pawn to get the nasty d5 pawn out of their doorway.
For this opening… I blunder and lose 🤷♂️
@@john4459 The bishop sometimes becomes a target, but there's a trick to it:
4 ... b5 5 Bb3 a5 6 a4 bxa4 7. Bc4
Could you not have taken the pawn on a7 with the q?
Wife just had first born son. Now this video pops up. What a great day!
Wow congratulations. I wish i had a son! Unfortunately i will never have a f girl because they all f suck
I find the Ke8 move far more suspicious than the Nf6, because, to me, as a bad chess player, I'd move Nf6 there, too. But I'd do it for all the wrong reasons... mainly just because it felt very loose and out of play on the rim and I wouldn't have been considering Nf4 in that position.
danya you are too nice, this guy is giga cheating, and there is an increase with these players at every elo that get away with it