This is great content and i will watch this 2 or 3 times. But as a GTo wizard suscriber i think the next step is to have ICM postflop solutions and multiway chipEV and ICM solutions. For exemple 25% left, 20BB and 40BB on a subset of 25 flops with basic RFI spots, SB vs BB spots and 2 or 3 3bet spots would make it so much better because in MTT we never play for chips, even at 100% left the calling ranges are tighter than ChipEV. It is more imptortant for MTT players than the IA solver. Specially if I can't use the IA solver because i am not elite member even if i pay 80USD per month. I love GTo Wizard and use it every day, but feel quite desapointed i need to pay more for the IA solver and didn' t see any improvment about what really matters in MTTs : ICM posflop solutions. Need to use PIO for this and it could be so much better with GTO wizard. Still you are the best in the market and your videos and articles are amazing.
At 10:28, we show that UTG has 33.6% Trash Hands and LJ has 0%. What actually are these? When you hover over Trash, UTG's range highlights K9s but LJ also has this hand too? I can't see what trash hands they have that we (LJ) don't? Even hands like 98s, 87s and T8s have a pair at least. I plugged this in and it still highlights K9s but also 77 and under which are still pairs. Maybe i'm misunderstanding! Thanks.
Here we go again. This video is a already a classic for me. You Gto wizard team should sponso MaTT Hunt for the Super high roller circuit, could be fun.
Why is it that when i try and apply these heuristics vs gto trainer mtt at 50bb that it never likes bluffs. I can get perfect score vs trainer by playing check calls and being super passive.
@@ZacMetin as mentioned in my 1st comment i’m only talking about the ranges shown at 0:54, I’m positive i’m pulling different ranges from GTOW with the correct settings and depth which is why I’m so confused, are we talking about the same timestamp?
When you make your opponent's hands indifferent between calling and folding, you capture the full pot worth of EV. If they weren't indifferent, it would mean there are leaks in your strategy that could be exploited losing you money. This leads into a discussion of GTO vs Exploits, and the nature of balanced poker. I recommend this article to learn more: blog.gtowizard.com/what-does-gto-aim-to-achieve/
Because the strength of your hand is determined by how strong the opposing range is. If IP has JT, they're usually up against lower pairs like 33-TT, missed overcards, etc. But if OOP has JT, they are more often up against strong hands QQ-AA, better top pairs, etc.
![3 HACKS to RUN DEEP in Small Stakes Tournaments [MTTs]](/img/1.gif)
Did you guys learn any new heuristics for 3-bet pots? Let us know down below! What should Matt Hunt cover next?
I just learned the word heuristics 🎉 😂
Complimenti per i contenuti,sarei molto felice se inserireste i sottotitoli in italiano,Grazie
When a GTOwizard video hits my feed I get all warm inside.
Nice and simple, with good heuroistics ! Keep it up 🔥🔥
This is great content and i will watch this 2 or 3 times. But as a GTo wizard suscriber i think the next step is to have ICM postflop solutions and multiway chipEV and ICM solutions. For exemple 25% left, 20BB and 40BB on a subset of 25 flops with basic RFI spots, SB vs BB spots and 2 or 3 3bet spots would make it so much better because in MTT we never play for chips, even at 100% left the calling ranges are tighter than ChipEV.
It is more imptortant for MTT players than the IA solver. Specially if I can't use the IA solver because i am not elite member even if i pay 80USD per month. I love GTo Wizard and use it every day, but feel quite desapointed i need to pay more for the IA solver and didn' t see any improvment about what really matters in MTTs : ICM posflop solutions. Need to use PIO for this and it could be so much better with GTO wizard. Still you are the best in the market and your videos and articles are amazing.
Thanks so much! Postflop ICM and mutliway postflop solutions are in our roadmap!
help.gtowizard.com/gto-wizard-ai-roadmap/
Hunt is the best!
At 10:28, we show that UTG has 33.6% Trash Hands and LJ has 0%. What actually are these? When you hover over Trash, UTG's range highlights K9s but LJ also has this hand too? I can't see what trash hands they have that we (LJ) don't? Even hands like 98s, 87s and T8s have a pair at least.
I plugged this in and it still highlights K9s but also 77 and under which are still pairs. Maybe i'm misunderstanding! Thanks.
Amazing video.
Here we go again. This video is a already a classic for me. You Gto wizard team should sponso MaTT Hunt for the Super high roller circuit, could be fun.
Why is it that when i try and apply these heuristics vs gto trainer mtt at 50bb that it never likes bluffs. I can get perfect score vs trainer by playing check calls and being super passive.
What do the height / area of the colour of each hand in the range represent?
Thank you !
At 0:54 I don't think the ranges you're showing are correct? They're different from what I can pull up from GTOW
The ragnes are correct. You can find these in the 8max ChipEV solutions, filtered for the 3-betting range.
That’s weird, on my sim for SB vs UTG 80 deep, the SB 3bets AJs and AQs at low frequencies for exemple. Any idea what is the issue ?
maybe because it is cash game ?@@Falendil
@@Falendil they are the same in app are you sure you don't have it set on wrong positions? or additional settings eg pko?
@@ZacMetin as mentioned in my 1st comment i’m only talking about the ranges shown at 0:54, I’m positive i’m pulling different ranges from GTOW with the correct settings and depth which is why I’m so confused, are we talking about the same timestamp?
What do we accomplish to make hands in opponent range indifferent?
When you make your opponent's hands indifferent between calling and folding, you capture the full pot worth of EV. If they weren't indifferent, it would mean there are leaks in your strategy that could be exploited losing you money. This leads into a discussion of GTO vs Exploits, and the nature of balanced poker.
I recommend this article to learn more: blog.gtowizard.com/what-does-gto-aim-to-achieve/
@@GTOWizard Thank you for the detailed explanation!
very nice class
19:13 why hands as low as JTs is highlighted as best hands for IP 3 bettor but hands as high as AJs for OOP 3bet caller is not best hands?
Because the strength of your hand is determined by how strong the opposing range is.
If IP has JT, they're usually up against lower pairs like 33-TT, missed overcards, etc. But if OOP has JT, they are more often up against strong hands QQ-AA, better top pairs, etc.
@@GTOWizard Thank you for the detailed explanation!
Very nice video!
bol şans..
bol şans
top top top