Kayleigh & Lavender - Marillion (Rock Steady 1990)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 сен 2024
- Well well, Marillion on the telly, that hasn't happened for a good few years now!
These vids are from a late night program called Rock Steady recorded by a friend of mine in 1990. It features some tracks from their Seasons End tour recorded at the De Montfort hall in leicester.
Hope you enjoy them.
Set List:
King Of Sunset Town
Easter
Uninvited Guest
Warm Wet Circles
Holloway Girls
Hooks In You
Kayleigh / Lavender
Incommunicado
Totally love Steve Hogarth, even singing Fish Era songs. Fucking amazing.
I enjoy both eras of the band. I don't base it on who sings what or who isn't there.
I base it on what I'm hearing, pure and simple.
I enjoyed listening to this, and I enjoy listening to Fish sing it.
To those who say the band went downhill after Fish left, Easter and Beautiful disagree.
Great work H!!! I like Fish version to, both are great singers
Still after 20 years people compare Fish to 'H'. Don't like 'H's interpretation? Don't listen to it, some of us can appreciate both interpretations of 'fish era' songs
I like it, he is not trying to imitate fish, he sings on his own way
Great video!!!!!!
I love Marillion
Steve is so slim sized here, I love this guy, great musician. He is not playing, he is touching the guitar
Weird to hear H in this song, although he inserts just as much emotion as FISH and, imo, even more when he sings his own material. I have the impression that H sings his heart out while Fish acts as an actor playing himself.
They rarely perform any pre-H songs live any more, thank god. This video was taken of the 1991 tour and they'd only done one album with him at that point so they were bound to do Kayleigh etc.
Fish could not sing Holloway Girl as good as Steve. Get a grip
I like how H sings Kayleigh. Sure, he's not Fish but he makes it his own. I can't believe how long H has been in the band! It makes me feel old.
I totally agree.
absolutely
do keep in mind (those of you with open minds) that this recording was more than 20 years ago. H has gotten considerably more "into" the older material when he performs it today (and the band's equipment and sound quality is far better these days as well).
He's also not trying to be "the better Fish", and I wouldn't want him to.
Agreed.
Good question! To this day, there is still some resentment between band members. Remember commenting on the superb works on Fish's solo albums to one of the Marillion crew at a show in 2004...as you can guess...the reception to my comment....not tooo good!
As Yorkshire Pudding goes with beef and chips go with fish (excuse the pun), so is SH connected with classics like Ocean Cloud and Fish with classics like these here. Nice to see him have a go, and I`m sure the crowd expect some of the old stuff, but it`s like watching Michael Phelps trying to play football. I`m 50/50 on the eternal Fish-Hogarth war - except here.
hey I conceded the fact that I don't know much about marillion, and didn't know they'd replaced fish.
Kind of the same feel when Phil Collins sings Gabriel-era Genesis. The post '88Marillion is good, but some of it has become redundant....alot of it sounds the same album after album. Fish and Hogarth are poles apart musically & lyrically. Waiting for the day for a Marillion reunion...a one-off performance filmed in Scotland..
you have to hear some of his albums, there amazing, better then fish era some of it. check out 'marbles'
This song is Fish's all the way - but Hogarth really sounds at the top of his game.
But when it comes to uneducated...I've been listening to hard rock and heavy metal since the start of the 70's. Now although marillion is not my thing those two songs I'll say were their best imo (maybe its just because I remember them when they came out) But I'll give credit where due, and fish had a powerful voice, and although this other guy can sing, he neutered those songs.
However music is very subjective, and to each their own
I feel this like a joke to Fish by Hogart...
But I like both singers anyways ;)
Me and how many people ? :-( : Misplaced childhood
Without Fish, the stage of Marillion will be always empty.
i love fish , but to end it all . i say hearth is a fine replacement , sure he can't sing the old songs with his heart. he didn't write them, but he's great at new.
In my opinion Hogarth has some really good vocals at certain points in this performance, his voice seems to high during the verse, he has to suddenly stop before reaching any vibrato. But really good, specially during the chorus.
Hi Peter, agreed, Hogarth sounds much more colourful during the chorus, i actually prefer his phrasing of the chorus over the original...cue backlash and it only took 11 years to comment
There' s no other Kayleigh version without Fish.
I'm sorry for my words but it's just like to put the chocolate near the shit.
This is very similar to Sammy Hagar singing "Jump" for Van Halen: good, real good. But not just the same.... :)
PLISSS...FISHHH
He sings it very well, but it lacks a certain emotion, probably cause the lyrics were personal to Fish..(?)
I like them both. But I don't like Hogarth to sing Fish-Songs. Only before I heard the version of Fish. Fish is Fish an "H" is "H". Marillion to me are two kompletely different Bands. I sing in a tribute.show and I think I'm the better Fish than "H". Something in between. But "Kayleigh" to me is the hardest Fish-Song to sing.
Seasons End, Brave, Afraid of the sunlight, even Holidays in Eden are very nice albums from the Hogarth era. But the lasts Marillion albums are really boring (Maybe Anoraknophobia is a little exception)
BETTER THEN FISH!!!
H. shouldn't sung this song. This is totally Fish, only with his voice and emotions it could be called Kayleigh, this is "something sounds a bit like Kayleigh". H. totally killed this song.
wolę Kayleight w wykonaniu Ryby
Hogarth is good but when i hear Fish's voice i feel i'm in theater and he is great actor!
Fish is Fish!That's all!
There is more emotion in Fish's vocals, more variety in articulation
He totally ruined these 2 masterpieces, the power of Fish's voice at that time was really unbeatable (at least by Hogarth). He put no emotions at all while singing these 2 songs, he just did it as if he was very bored and "in a hurry" to finish.....oh dear!
without Fish, nahhhh!
weak version.....Fish is much more powerfull and brilliant! this sounds a bit fade- out...Marillion is not the same without Fish :-(
ño
You have no clue, do ya? Next time you have an uneducated thought, just let it go. OK?
Decent version of this tune but blasphemous for them to do it without Fish! H is cool but I haven't bought a CD with him on it yet....'nough said huh?!
Sure Hogarth is not a bad singer, but no one can sing Kayleigh like the man Fish. Hogarth doesn't come close I'm afraid. His voice lacks the power and most importantly it hasn't got that distinctive, uniqueness that Fish had in his voice. Hogarth just 'sings' Fish told a story, while he sang, with his voice.
H is prettier...
loved it up until the guy started singing
Band are fantastic but H sucks when doing Fish stuff.