Fastest Fighter Aircraft Above Mach 1 Top Speed Comparison 3D

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
  • Which is your favourite supersonic fighter jet.
    49 fastest fighter aircraft above Mach 1 Top Speed Comparison 3D
    Featuring
    F-102 Delta Dagger
    MiG-19
    F-100 Super Sabre
    Yakovlev Yak-141
    SEPECAT Jaguar
    HAL Tejas
    F-101 Voodoo
    PAC JF-17 Thunder
    Dassault Rafale
    F-CK-1 Ching-kuo
    Sukhoi Su-34
    Shenyang FC-31
    F/A-18 Hornet
    CF-105 Arrow
    Eurofighter Typhoon
    Saab 35 Draken
    Mitsubishi F-2
    Chengdu J-7
    F-16 Fighting Falcon
    M0G-21
    F-16 Viper
    Saab 37 Viggen
    Shenyang J-11
    Sukhoi Su-57
    BAC TSR2
    Mirage 2000
    Panavia Tornado ADV
    Chengdu J-10
    F-104 Starfighter
    Northrop YF-23
    Sukhoi Su-47
    F-4 Phantom II
    Mikoyan MiG-35
    Sukhoi Su-35
    F-22 Raptor
    F-107 Ultra Sabre
    BAC Lightning
    Mikoyan MiG-29
    IAI Kfir
    MiG-23 Flogger
    Sukhoi Su-27
    F-106 Delta Dart
    Shenyang J-8
    F-14 Tomcat
    Chengdu J-20
    F-111 Aardvark
    F-15 Eagle
    MiG-31 Foxhound
    MiG-25 Foxbat
    𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂
    Whitesand - Vision- Inspirational Piano Music
    Whitesand - Fireflies 2
    Whitesand - My Spirit Is Free
    Check out Whitesand Channel
    / whitesandcomposer
    𝟑𝐃 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐬
    - own creations
    - 3D Warehouse (Awesome)
    Per section 1.B.ii of the 3D Warehouse TOC - "Combined Work"
    Like, Share and Subscribe to 𝗔𝗺𝗮𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗩𝗶𝘇
    www.amazingviz...
    Help me Grow this Channel

Комментарии • 1,2 тыс.

  • @dulguunchannel7609
    @dulguunchannel7609 Год назад +156

    Respect to mig-25. Its amazing to see that a jet from 1964 is still holds the record until now

    • @juhikoinb1403
      @juhikoinb1403 Год назад +9

      In fact, this is not the case and its maximum is the same as that of the Mig 31. 3.2M is already the level of the non-combat SR-71.

    • @lurtzsaruman
      @lurtzsaruman Год назад

      ruclips.net/video/E5vAoH_rpEk/видео.html
      ruclips.net/video/aHAkGfvMaZ4/видео.html

    • @CommonSenz
      @CommonSenz Год назад +3

      yes. but it was pretty much useless

    • @alexandrnoskov5437
      @alexandrnoskov5437 Год назад +4

      @@CommonSenz How is it useless? Its presence forced the Pentagon to stop flying over the territory of the USSR. And today it is a platform for launching hypersonic missiles. It will take off in Siberia, launch a Zircon missile, and destroy a US carrier group in the Black Sea if need be.

    • @CommonSenz
      @CommonSenz Год назад

      @@alexandrnoskov5437 bc in the meantime there was an invention called ICBMs.. by the time it was manufactures in large numbers, there was nothing to intercept with MIG25s..

  • @SOBIsHobbies
    @SOBIsHobbies 2 года назад +173

    That SU-47 looked mighty good! Too bad it never was adopted. Even to this date it looks amazing, so does YF-23. Great video. 👍

    • @user-no3qg1qf9n
      @user-no3qg1qf9n 2 года назад +11

      Су 47 использовался как летающая лабаратория, на его основе был заложен су 57.....

    • @loooopeytunes
      @loooopeytunes 2 года назад +9

      Su-47 have problems in material rigidity, especially in that front-swept wings. Even it can increase agility, it can be very fragile because the front-swept wings have shape against the airflow. The stress it endures is too strong. Perhaps we'll have front-swept wings fighters in the future if we have already invent a material that's light, flexible, but strong enough

    • @furtherguidedvoltron8195
      @furtherguidedvoltron8195 2 года назад +4

      Japan is revamping the widow. can't wait to see what it looks like.

    • @UR4AL
      @UR4AL 2 года назад +6

      Су-47 был слишком дорог и неудачным, поэоому не пошел в серию

    • @shortmoviesdarkangel6238
      @shortmoviesdarkangel6238 2 года назад +2

      @@UR4AL ф 117 тоже неудачник, но их наштампоали, мама не горюй

  • @nicolaspeigne1429
    @nicolaspeigne1429 2 года назад +204

    Honorable mention to the Mirage 3 that was the first non US/USSR aircraft to break Mach 2, and the Mirage G8 who still holds the record in Western Europe at Mach 2.38

    • @Blackbushvanom
      @Blackbushvanom 2 года назад +5

      похуй, миг 23 в 60-х годах уже столько летал

    • @watcherzero5256
      @watcherzero5256 2 года назад +3

      Only officially beat the English Electric Lightning by 31 days, though Lightning had been doing it for several months but lacked the fuel for two timed runs to get the official title. But to show the rate of advance only two years earlier the Fairey Delta 2 became the first aircraft to break 1,000 mph and would hold the record of Mach 1.5 as the fastest plane in the world for a year.

    • @clems3432
      @clems3432 2 года назад +4

      And the first to intercept an U-2

    • @Blackbushvanom
      @Blackbushvanom 2 года назад +2

      @@clems3432 древнейшая с-75 перехватила u-2))))))))))))))))))))00

    • @BeautifulPeopleBTFLPPL
      @BeautifulPeopleBTFLPPL 2 года назад +1

      World's largest plane Ukraine's ‘Mriya’ destroyed in Russian attack .
      ruclips.net/video/YkkzAqZapTA/видео.html
      .......

  • @NarrowKilla
    @NarrowKilla 2 года назад +34

    Oh yes a Foxbat
    Even today it still looks like a freaking starfighter
    What a sexy beast

    • @carharttblade
      @carharttblade 2 года назад

      Fucking unreal, i want one

    • @Abdulla_Izrailyevich_von_Stahl
      @Abdulla_Izrailyevich_von_Stahl Год назад +1

      @@carharttblade , the Russians usually say: "Охуеть! Дайте ДВЕ!!!" ("Holy shit! Give me TWO ones!!!" :D

  • @4l3x5andro
    @4l3x5andro 2 года назад +54

    Mig29 e Su37 Berkut são os mais belos aviões de combate já fabricados.
    🇧🇷⛪🇧🇷

    • @military6531
      @military6531 2 года назад

      а че почему они стали китайскими

    • @military6531
      @military6531 2 года назад +2

      они Российские бл

  • @Kai-pg3xz
    @Kai-pg3xz 2 года назад +231

    Russian fighter names (according to NATO)
    0:22 “Farmer”
    0:40 “Freestyle”
    1:53 “Fullback”
    3:30 “Fishbed”
    4:15 “Felon”
    5:26 “Berkut”
    5:45 “Fulcrum-F”
    5:54 “Flanker-E”
    6:33 “Fulcrum”
    6:53 “Flogger” (I know, it shows the name in the video, but I still wanted to include it)
    7:00 “Flanker”
    2:23 “Finback”
    8:26 “Foxhound”
    8:41 “Foxbat”

    • @tacticalra1nbow956
      @tacticalra1nbow956 2 года назад +23

      And any other F words

    • @natsumeyashi3383
      @natsumeyashi3383 2 года назад +9

      @@tacticalra1nbow956 berkut 🤔

    • @Kai-pg3xz
      @Kai-pg3xz 2 года назад +8

      @@natsumeyashi3383
      Pretty sure that’s the only one that doesn’t start with f

    • @scottagamer
      @scottagamer 2 года назад +33

      @@Kai-pg3xz Because "F" is for fighter, and "B" for bomber.

    • @Leadblast
      @Leadblast 2 года назад +8

      You forgot 7:23 "Finback"

  • @renatojacomo2169
    @renatojacomo2169 2 года назад +11

    Great job!
    I just missed the Saab JAS 39 Gripen E.

  • @mikaelandpond9093
    @mikaelandpond9093 2 года назад +51

    Did you miss the Saab Jas 39 Gripen A,B,C,D and now E at 2.0 Mach... 2469.6 km/h... In operation by Swedish Air Force and.
    South African Air Force,
    Brazilian Air Force.
    Czech Air Force,

    • @adamsojka9802
      @adamsojka9802 2 года назад +7

      Yeah, i was surprised either, because this jet si very popular and effectively, so i was hoping, that i will see it in this video..

    • @torpedo996
      @torpedo996 2 года назад +6

      Ah yes the Gripen. I was searching to see if anyone else brought it up.

  • @HattaTHEZulZILLA86
    @HattaTHEZulZILLA86 2 года назад +81

    I'm so happy that my favorite Berkut is in this list. It's not the best but that forward swept wing design is WAY ahead of its time.
    Didn't know she could top out at Mach 2 though, faster than her supposedly superior model... always nice to know...

    • @hongbanphimd1737
      @hongbanphimd1737 2 года назад +1

      I am so happy that the mig 21 appered in this video

    • @IonPerseus
      @IonPerseus 2 года назад +2

      It was cancelled due to its behavior above mach 1,also construction trembling that wasn't solved, however it was good experience and data to collect

    • @asquare9316
      @asquare9316 2 года назад +1

      what about X-29?

    • @HattaTHEZulZILLA86
      @HattaTHEZulZILLA86 2 года назад

      @@asquare9316
      Nah. Sure, it has that forward swept wing thing going on but aesthetically, it's just not for me.

    • @flip66five
      @flip66five 2 года назад

      Its the forward swept wing that kills it... it gives superior performance at low speed but the faster you go, the more bite thry have and once they start flexing it causes an oscilation in the wing that is self aggrivating, not self stabilising...

  • @wheelman1235
    @wheelman1235 2 года назад +188

    Thanks for including the Avro Arrow. It's TAS speed will never be known because of the untimely cancellation. In all estimates, the Arrow certainly would have exceeded Mach 2. Thank you for the video.

    • @AmazingViz
      @AmazingViz  2 года назад +22

      Avro Arrow is a beauty ❤️

    • @viking5736
      @viking5736 2 года назад +9

      My favorite aircraft, mainly because of its tragic story.

    • @carlosecheverria6233
      @carlosecheverria6233 2 года назад

      Y el F5?

    • @MubashirOfficial
      @MubashirOfficial 2 года назад +4

      @@AmazingViz thanks for showing me Pakistan JF-17 thunder ⚡🇵🇰

    • @n8ivspat3n56
      @n8ivspat3n56 2 года назад +1

      My dad brought this up and he was wondering what killed the program? It was touted as an advanced fighter with internal weapons bays and other things but it just never went into production

  • @fran.6496
    @fran.6496 2 года назад +14

    Proud to be a mig 29 pilot. Soon swiching to beautiful rafale😍
    Im on training and in 2026 i ll be ready.

    • @CopiumCopi
      @CopiumCopi 2 года назад

      What’s the 29 like?

    • @fran.6496
      @fran.6496 2 года назад

      @@CopiumCopi 29 is awesome fighter but kinda old. Twin engine and good manuvarability. But rafale is next lvl. I lost my engine twice in a mig..

  • @tomkjr1
    @tomkjr1 2 года назад +27

    My favorite has always been the F-14 Tomcat. Not the fastest, but IMO the most beautiful looking still or in flight.

  • @dynosaw4313
    @dynosaw4313 2 года назад +26

    amazing, great work! love the animations!

  • @zeom76
    @zeom76 2 года назад +17

    The Soviets were great builders ... I saw a MiG25 once when I was a kid, flying overhead. 😊

    • @tk-4772
      @tk-4772 2 года назад +4

      Your lucky

    • @H-cranky
      @H-cranky 2 года назад +3

      Lucky. I only see F-15s and F-16s

    • @crimeanhawk123
      @crimeanhawk123 2 года назад +7

      I see Mig-31s with a dagger under their bellies, Su-35s, Su-34s, Mig-29s almost every day. I live in the Crimea and they are patrolling our borders, chasing NATO chicks away from the borders of Russia. Sometimes it seems to me that Russia should send its strategic bombers along the US borders at a minimum distance (but without violating the 12-mile distance from the coast) And arrange full-scale exercises with strategic nuclear forces with Cuba and Venizuela in the Gulf of Mexico.

    • @tk-4772
      @tk-4772 2 года назад +2

      @@crimeanhawk123 that would be a great idea

    • @jrgenschulstock8261
      @jrgenschulstock8261 2 года назад +4

      @@crimeanhawk123 While a great show of force yes. I do not think it is the most viable option if anyone wants to keep peace between the two of them. Although i get why Russia is doing all of this. Imagine if Russia had militairy bases in Mexico and Cuba. Its the exact same that the US has militairy bases in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Norway. I don't think the US would act very kindly if russian bases were on Cuba. Just like they did in the 60s.

  • @topiahead
    @topiahead 2 года назад +2

    Great thanks for including the founder of Singapore, Mr Lee Quan Yew into the video for the F-16 section.

  • @catfood_03_4stray
    @catfood_03_4stray 2 года назад +31

    A lot of important supersonic aircraft are not mentioned in the list. Like the F-5A, the F-5E, the Mirage-III, the Mirage F-1, the Su-22, the MiG-15, the F-8. the F-105, and if you mention the YF-23 and the CF-105 Arrow that never entered service, why don't you mention the F-20 or the YF-17 ?

  • @ElectroMusicLab
    @ElectroMusicLab 2 года назад +3

    *To everyone who flips through the comments, health to you and your loved ones.*❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @augiehicks4588
    @augiehicks4588 2 года назад +29

    Pretty cool, altho in regards to the F-14 Dave Anderson was able to take an F-14B to Mach 2.5 which remains the Tomcat’s highest speed record.

  • @AiryAary
    @AiryAary 2 года назад +5

    3:20 never before have I seen a fully armed F-16 with a paintjob used for airshows

  • @pumpkin8122
    @pumpkin8122 2 года назад +26

    it is amazing how the Soviet Union was technologically advanced in terms of combat vehicles that fighters from 50 years ago are in the top now, and the fastest fighter is also the USSR

    • @KABKAKIy_KAPATEJI_DOP
      @KABKAKIy_KAPATEJI_DOP Год назад +3

      yeah, and ruzzia is degraded

    • @IgorG89
      @IgorG89 Год назад +1

      Priorities have changed, speed is not the main requirement at the moment.

  • @H-cranky
    @H-cranky 2 года назад +5

    Thank you for including the F-104. My favourite cold war jet

    • @AmazingViz
      @AmazingViz  2 года назад +3

      Lockheed F-104 Starfighter is beautiful

    • @H-cranky
      @H-cranky 2 года назад

      @@AmazingViz indeed it is :)

  • @enniosavi7064
    @enniosavi7064 2 года назад +31

    Technically you should consider also the interceptor Lockheed YF-12 Blackbird.

    • @viking5736
      @viking5736 2 года назад +5

      The SR-71 Blackbird was not an interceptor, it was a US Spyplane that replaced the U2. The MiG-25 was the interceptor designed by the USSR to intercept the blackbird

    • @SkalyGhostGaming
      @SkalyGhostGaming 2 года назад

      @@viking5736 also Ennio Savi said YF-12 which was the precursor prototype stage of the SR-71 Blackbird

  • @ahmedrs8301
    @ahmedrs8301 2 года назад +1

    Very cool video. I don't know much about Mach and I really liked this video. Please don't stop posting videos just because you have few subscribers 🙏

  • @matsuhikotakagawa8060
    @matsuhikotakagawa8060 2 года назад +11

    Design-wise, I simply love Su-47 and F-117 - nothing else...

    • @jc.1191
      @jc.1191 2 года назад

      F117 still looks so futuristic and cool. I always loved that one.

  • @MrYellingdingo
    @MrYellingdingo 2 года назад +9

    The Foxbat's operational speed was 2.8. It was recorded doing 3.2 once but it damaged the aircraft beyond repair.

    • @georgiperilov9175
      @georgiperilov9175 Год назад +5

      They had variation of the mig that was basically strapped of all weight and could reach 3.2 mach easily but pilots that flew in these described it like "rocket with seat " because a lot of stuff were removed to make it lighter, and they mainly created this variation to intercept the sr-71

    • @j.griffin
      @j.griffin Год назад +2

      @@georgiperilov9175
      …but it never did.
      The Blackbird was shot at over 2,000 times-
      but it was never shot down.

    • @georgiperilov9175
      @georgiperilov9175 Год назад +1

      @@j.griffin i havent said that it did i said that they built the modification with that purpose

    • @wtvdam
      @wtvdam Год назад +4

      The aircraft couldn’t sustain Mach 3 for very long. It could get and stay at Mach 3 for about a minute or two before the engines would blow up. As with so many cold war strategies, this one was mainly to fool western observers. Practical max speed was about Mach 2.6.

    • @fosj385
      @fosj385 Год назад +4

      @@wtvdam And SR-71 could CRUISE at 3.2 as long as she had fuel!!

  • @rexblade504
    @rexblade504 2 года назад +6

    8:13 it isn't being replaced just yet, the production of the F-22 has stopped and the air force has ordered new F-15s, the F-15 EX

    • @jc.1191
      @jc.1191 2 года назад

      F15ex looks awesome too

  • @rajkumarsharma4927
    @rajkumarsharma4927 2 года назад +6

    I really love 😍 & appreciate your work ♥ & perfection.
    Just a small request to you.
    Please make the video on Indian Air Force 🇮🇳 aircrafts (type & size comparison). Please 🙏 it's a huge request 🙏

  • @mightbecursed
    @mightbecursed 2 года назад +19

    Soviet planes are still magnificent. True artefacts of bygone civilization.

    • @RESPECT-nc7cf
      @RESPECT-nc7cf 2 года назад

      Урус разлогинься

    • @domokl1
      @domokl1 Год назад +3

      Мы никуда не делись.

    • @I_am_true
      @I_am_true Год назад +3

      Точно, просто немного заблудились и спали, сейчас вернулись на путь и проснулись 👍

  • @RustyRen
    @RustyRen 2 года назад +4

    Finally see the Arrow! Thanks! 🇨🇦

    • @AmazingViz
      @AmazingViz  2 года назад

      You''re welcome 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 🇨🇦

    • @cosmoswang7984
      @cosmoswang7984 2 года назад

      Best plane Canada ever build. However........

  • @aadd9233
    @aadd9233 2 года назад +7

    Многие самолёты прошлых лет, были превосходны, и сегодня они не плохие.

    • @FANHSGER
      @FANHSGER 2 года назад +1

      Это отголоски более развитой цивилизации. СССР

    • @user-ql4gb3km7b
      @user-ql4gb3km7b 2 года назад

      @@FANHSGER С этим трудно поспорить

    • @polyak2143
      @polyak2143 Год назад

      @@FANHSGER получается что миг 31 и су 35 су 57 хуже по скорости чем су-27? А миг 31 хуже миг 25? Не верится.... двигатели минимум не хуже планер минимум не хуже... думаю характеристики специально на публику дают хуже реальных...

    • @TrahhTibidohh
      @TrahhTibidohh Год назад +1

      @@polyak2143 МИГ-25 создавался для перехвата SR-71. Но так как SR-71 оказался не бомбером, а просто разведчиком, то такой быстрый самолёт стал не нужен. И поэтому в МИГ-31 пожертвовали максимальной скоростью в пользу надёжности и времени полёта.

    • @polyak2143
      @polyak2143 Год назад

      @@TrahhTibidohh спасибо за ответ. Про миг-25 понятно а про сушки я так понимаю реальные характеристики засекречены...

  • @ivan2nem912
    @ivan2nem912 Год назад +1

    Sometimes MiG-31 fly over my head. And this is delicious action.

  • @jasonsemerko6053
    @jasonsemerko6053 2 года назад +10

    With the CF-105 Avro Arrow. Unfortunately it was canceled before it could fly with the Iroquois engines that were developed for it. Which would have pushed its speed beyond Mach 3

    • @theidiotictroublemaker2281
      @theidiotictroublemaker2281 2 года назад

      That's overhyping?

    • @demscrazy6574
      @demscrazy6574 2 года назад

      The plane can’t go beyond Mach 3 due to heating up problems. That’s why all planes are going Mach 2. When you start to hit the Mach 3 barrier you get a heat cone kind of like the re-entry of the space shuttle which is why Mach 2.9 or so is more or less the limit. It’s kind of like breaking the sound barrier

  • @Mishn0
    @Mishn0 2 года назад +63

    If you've got the Su-47 listed, it's only fair that you include the YF-12, top speed of Mach 3.35. They actually launched missiles from it, unlike the Berkut which was a one-off technology demonstrator rather than a prototype combat aircraft.

    • @pictograph
      @pictograph 2 года назад +6

      YF-12 is a reconnaissance aircraft, NOT a fighter aircraft.

    • @ejv0wjc08gtsnoj0
      @ejv0wjc08gtsnoj0 2 года назад +13

      @@pictograph "The modified A-12, first designated the AF-12 and then the YF-12A, was designed and built under a project codenamed KEDLOCK. The aircraft’s mission was to intercept new Soviet supersonic bombers long before they reached the United States. It carried three air-to-air missiles and a second crewman who worked the fire control system. "

    • @DOGMA1138
      @DOGMA1138 2 года назад +6

      @@pictograph No. The YF-12 was an interceptor hence the F in the name, it was supposed to intercept and shootdown enemy supersonic bombers, it was built as a weapon system with the AIM-47 Falcon.
      The AIM-47 Falcon never entered service as the YF-12 never did, but they were fully developed and tested and ready for serial production when the project was cancelled. in fact when it was cancelled the aircraft has already received an official airforce designation as the F-12B, as well as appeared on the budget as such.
      The AIM-47 Falcon was designed to be launched at Mach 3+ cruising speeds which the YF-12 was capable of reaching and indeed they tested the missile with launches at Mach 3.2-3.3. The AIM-47 Falcon and the radar developed for the YF-12 ended up being the basis for the AIM-54 Phoenix and the massive radar of the F-14.
      On the other and the Su-47 was never anything more than a technology demonstrator and one plagued with more issues than you can count.

    • @osrikking8785
      @osrikking8785 2 года назад +1

      @@pictograph As other have pointed out, the lettering and numbering says it all. Y is for prototype. F is for fighter. 12 puts it right after the F-11 Tiger (1962) and before the F-14 Tomcat (1972) (since for some reason the Fighter numbering system jumped to the F-100 to the F-111 - though I don't know what caused this). SR is for "Strategic Reconnaissance", though for some reason the Blackbird is the only plane to ever receive this moniker.

  • @crossimpactgaming9200
    @crossimpactgaming9200 Год назад +3

    "It's not the plane.. It's the pilot"

  • @pizzasaurolophus
    @pizzasaurolophus 2 года назад +1

    F-15 is not being replaced by F-22, F-35 maybe, however the US just ordered a bunch of new F-15EX which will be in use for another few decades.

    • @danielmeador1991
      @danielmeador1991 2 года назад

      I’d say several decades long live the eagle

  • @normal-potato05
    @normal-potato05 2 года назад +5

    i'm glad that not many people are asking this, but the reason why the SR71 isn't here is because it's not a fighter, it's a reconnaissance aircraft (camera)
    Let's go *M I G G E R S*

    • @rajkumarsharma4927
      @rajkumarsharma4927 2 года назад

      You're right

    • @covenantor663
      @covenantor663 2 года назад

      Though it’s sister project, the YF-12A was designed as an interceptor.

    • @davidhough7070
      @davidhough7070 2 года назад +1

      Or the RA-5 Vigilante.

    • @covenantor663
      @covenantor663 2 года назад

      @@davidhough7070 according to Wikipedia the Vigilante was a Bomber not a fighter.

  • @jatinchavan1599
    @jatinchavan1599 2 года назад +7

    Im so proud to see Jaguar and HAL Tejas.

  • @jackeboi6289
    @jackeboi6289 2 года назад +9

    2:24 Mach 2 is damn fast for 1958

  • @jeremymoreside1444
    @jeremymoreside1444 2 года назад +5

    It is believed that Crawford Gordon of AV RO Canada had altered the results of the inial testing that was done before the Iroquois engine could be finished. His strategy was to under rate the engine they had at the time to boost sales on the Iroquois by literally blowing away its competition. It's believed that 206 was capable of Mach 3 without the more powerful Iroquois

  • @shengrushi2336
    @shengrushi2336 2 года назад +2

    "you know a lot of fighter jets" Said my 6 years boy. I like the part of winnie the pooh throw out the money, not many people can understand that bit, thank you

  • @jpnc2319
    @jpnc2319 2 года назад +3

    Nice as you always do! congratulations!
    I think you forgot one... SR-71 Blackbird with MACH 3

    • @noahsaunders3919
      @noahsaunders3919 2 года назад +5

      The SR-71 Blackbird was a Reconnasince Aircraft not a Fighter jet...

    • @jpnc2319
      @jpnc2319 2 года назад +3

      @@noahsaunders3919 Originally, the Blackbird was built to be equipped with weapons but was converted into a reconnaissance plane when it was realized that the plane flew faster than a rifle bullet.
      Also the similar projects known as A-12 and YF-12.

    • @noahsaunders3919
      @noahsaunders3919 2 года назад +4

      @@jpnc2319 Yes, That is true I suppose.. though of course these aircraft did a specific role. The initial intent of the YF-12 program was to drop a large bomb on Russia, but even that did not pan out. Not also withstanding the amount of time and cost it took for one SR-71 to fly. Interesting fact about it though is that Briefly they did not hook up with a tanker in five minutes after Takeoff, it had to return. After a successful partial fueling, it flew to altitude and then dove to heat up the skin to stop all of the leaks as that was how the aircraft was designed. These aircraft of course had to be handbuilt and could not be fully mass produced like most aircraft only the U.S could afford to operate them but in the end they were probably were never going to be fighters or interceptors.
      Ethier way Stay safe
      ~ regards Noah.

  • @BeingFireRetardant
    @BeingFireRetardant 2 года назад +14

    Su-47 may be the most beautiful plane ever to fly...

  • @hmshood319
    @hmshood319 2 года назад +13

    I bloody love the EE Lightnings. Iconic stacked engine config and the acceleration of a stabbed rat. Plus a hefty portion of good looks

    • @mynameismin3
      @mynameismin3 2 года назад +1

      I agree. The British had some awesome designs back in the 50's, and if they had more funding the world would have seen some more truly outstanding British aircraft.

    • @Mishn0
      @Mishn0 2 года назад

      And absolutely terrible maintenance accessibility.

    • @crazyfroggie6546
      @crazyfroggie6546 2 года назад

      And they went through their fuel so fast they only had an operational range of about 250 to 300 miles

  • @kyriakos2706
    @kyriakos2706 2 года назад +7

    Yf-12? Also the F-22s speed is classified

  • @minigero
    @minigero 2 года назад +17

    overall the dassault rafale is one of the most impressive

    • @Manish-ud4sl
      @Manish-ud4sl 2 года назад +1

      But it is french company not an endian

    • @rayson9781
      @rayson9781 2 года назад

      @@Manish-ud4sl well yeah it is

    • @julwiezdeghorz5089
      @julwiezdeghorz5089 2 года назад

      At mach 1.8 it sucxs. 😊
      Speed is essential in chasing, evading and escaping out of the battle field. I will go for the upgraded Mirage2000 instead.

    • @petermayer1106
      @petermayer1106 2 года назад

      @@julwiezdeghorz5089 other than speed, the Rafale is one of the most capable combat aircraft. There's a reason it replaced the Mirage.

    • @diecastworld7962
      @diecastworld7962 2 года назад +3

      Overhyped as crap

  • @murometz626
    @murometz626 2 года назад

    oh my, the F16 featuring the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew, together with Singa the Singapore courtesy campaign mascot :D

  • @rajkumarsharma4927
    @rajkumarsharma4927 2 года назад +1

    Thank you ❤️ for including HAL tejas & SEPECAT jaguar.

  • @rallyps
    @rallyps 2 года назад +7

    The mach speed at high altitude is lower than sea level (1234 km/h), so the real planes speed in mph/kph aren't fast than shown in this video in my opinión. Beautiful models.

  • @Spookyashell76
    @Spookyashell76 2 года назад +6

    Those speeds are fully stripped configurations. What is interesting is to know max speed with combat load. A F-35 looks slower than a F-16 on paper, but with combat load it's actually faster. A F-16 can't reach Mach 1.6 with weaponry. throw in a targeting pod and its alot slower. Fully pimped with a pod and droptanks it can't even reach Mach 1.

  • @facepalmjesus1608
    @facepalmjesus1608 2 года назад +1

    the music gave me the 2020 Covid chills

  • @mannysamson4091
    @mannysamson4091 2 года назад +1

    I loved how winnie the pooh was stuffed in lol. We all get it.

  • @lucassmith2043
    @lucassmith2043 2 года назад +6

    The F-4 phantom II I think does around Mach 1.9-2.0 so you could have added that

    • @catfood_03_4stray
      @catfood_03_4stray 2 года назад

      It is mentioned with a top speed 2,23 mach ( at 5:36 ). I had the impression that its speed was 2,3 mach.

  • @Followme556
    @Followme556 2 года назад +15

    how can the rate of climb of the sepecat jaguar, a plane that's been out of service for 20 years, be classified?

    • @boomermike71
      @boomermike71 2 года назад +6

      Some crap remains classified for decades. Even if it has literally zero impact on current day society, certain documents fall under certain time spans of classification.

    • @Followme556
      @Followme556 2 года назад

      @@boomermike71 I guess.

    • @aparnasreekumar1899
      @aparnasreekumar1899 2 года назад +4

      Nah man it still has some importance
      Its still in use with IAF

    • @squidwardo7074
      @squidwardo7074 2 года назад +1

      and you could probably calculate it pretty easily yourself

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 2 года назад +3

      It's still in service in Indian Air Force

  • @VarkDriver
    @VarkDriver 2 года назад +2

    There is the Mighty Vark, I had one at M 2.25 during an FCF flight, thing could move!

  • @NoNameMilitant
    @NoNameMilitant 2 года назад

    Thank you for the tomcat description

  • @mafmaf6417
    @mafmaf6417 2 года назад +14

    Everyone must also remember that the Avro Arrow did Mach 1.98 without the Iraquois engine as RL206 never flew before the cancellation of the program. The government was keen to not allow it to fly as the preseved performance would have outweighed the cancellation in the eyes of the Canadian public.

    • @locknload9143
      @locknload9143 2 года назад

      There's actually a good documentary about how the American government shut the program down and the reasons why. Mainly they didn't want Canada selling it when they were getting ready to produce There's.

  • @zzirSnipzz1
    @zzirSnipzz1 2 года назад +5

    Lightning was awesome i think the highest they ever took it to was 88,000

  • @raymondwilliams2609
    @raymondwilliams2609 2 года назад +1

    That was a rare treat, and a feast for the eyeballs ! Glad I found your channel ! I subbed, too !
    🤗☺️❤️👋

  • @mr.brasskutt5385
    @mr.brasskutt5385 2 года назад +7

    Video tan interesante como ilustrativo. Muchísimas gracias por todo..

    • @userok4G
      @userok4G 2 года назад

      Only here in the clip shows the maximum speed in the afterburner.)
      Now compare the speed without afterburner Su-57 - 2M with the rest of the aircraft ...))

  • @sailorgirlsmith
    @sailorgirlsmith 2 года назад +5

    The EE Lightning had a rate of climb over mach 1.3

    • @lenfirewood4089
      @lenfirewood4089 Год назад

      Yes the rate given in this table looks well below it's actual performance.

  • @natet9366
    @natet9366 2 года назад +9

    Man that arrow was so incredibly far ahead of its time

    • @Skanzool
      @Skanzool 2 года назад

      Actually it wasn't.

    • @goofyahhman9617
      @goofyahhman9617 Год назад

      @@Skanzool and an American aircraft was?

  • @gamingdave6099
    @gamingdave6099 Год назад

    The f-102 at the start looked like a beast❤ my type of aircraft

  • @IDiggSocialMedia
    @IDiggSocialMedia 2 года назад +1

    I like the name of the fastest plane, Foxbat!

  • @ruskiwaffle1991
    @ruskiwaffle1991 2 года назад +10

    Why does MiG-19 look so strange?

    • @tavolo2969
      @tavolo2969 2 года назад +2

      Low angle of attack of The wings

    • @cursed_jp
      @cursed_jp 2 года назад

      Because its not the mig 19 that you see here its actualy the mig 17

    • @birkensafttt
      @birkensafttt 2 года назад +1

      @@cursed_jp it doesn’t look like a MiG 17 either. It’s very weird

    • @Skibidi_tanker69
      @Skibidi_tanker69 2 года назад

      Cuz look like mig 15 wings

    • @HMSNeptun
      @HMSNeptun 2 года назад

      @@cursed_jp its a completely generic model. The MiG17 and MiG15 has T-tails, while the MiG-19 has a more swept wing

  • @user-cz3rd1pu4y
    @user-cz3rd1pu4y 2 года назад +4

    что то мне подсказывает что Миг 25 и дальнейшее поколение Мигов приблизительно 3 и больше маха выдать могут, просто все рекорды скорости на Миг 25 были побиты для боевых истребителей, а движки этого типа и проходившие модернизацию ставились на Миги следующих поколений, просто на них уже не пытались ставить рекорды скорости и проводить испытания, так как движок уже себя проявил в скоростных характеристиках на форсаже, смысл было каждую последующую модель самолёта, практически с тем же двигателем, снова испытывать на скорость? Думаю все Миги после Миг 25 можно смело ставить в разряд 3+ маха скорости.

    • @FishbedMyBeloved
      @FishbedMyBeloved 2 года назад

      единственное, что не перешло от МиГ-25, это двигатели. это были буквально перепрофилированные двигатели крылатых ракет, срок службы которых измерялся часами. Это было хорошо для перехватчика, которому никогда не приходилось летать подолгу, но для современных МиГов это было бы поразительно бесполезно. дополнительная скорость не стоила плохой надежности и тяжелой логистической нагрузки.

    • @FishbedMyBeloved
      @FishbedMyBeloved 2 года назад

      Translation of my comment for English readers: If there was one thing not carried over by the MiG-25, it was the engines. They were literally repurposed cruise missile engines and had a service life measured in hours. While this was good for interceptors like itself, using these engines on any other fighter would not be worth the logistical strain after extended flight. Normal engines are used in all MiGs after the MiG-25.

    • @user-cz3rd1pu4y
      @user-cz3rd1pu4y 2 года назад

      @@FishbedMyBeloved ну может и так, не буду спорить, прям до мелочей в это не вникал. А англо язычные люди думаю умеют пользоваться онлайн переводчиком.

  • @larrymead151
    @larrymead151 2 года назад +2

    I wouldn't bet on any Chinese aircraft actually doing their claimed top speed.

  • @LessAiredvanU
    @LessAiredvanU 2 года назад +16

    I am a BAC Lightning fanboy, so I would just like to point out that it is the oldest aircraft on this list and is the only one capable of going from sub sonic to supersonic in a vertical climb, and can sustain Mach 2 when verticle... Shame about the range and armament, though.

    • @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus
      @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus 2 года назад

      Starfighter is older by a few months if we go by date of first flight. March vs. August of '54. Lightning F.6 only reaches 1:1 thrust to weight in burner with about 1,000 lbs of fuel on board, so I'd like to see the numbers on the version that can go through Mach 1 in a vertical climb. Seems unlikely in the F.6 and even then only just before it flames out from fuel starvation (the Avons go through 505 lbs/min each in burner). Also pretty certain the F-15 will go through Mach 1 going straight up with an empty weight of 28,000 lbs and total burner thrust of 47,540 lbs.

    • @jozomrkva
      @jozomrkva 2 года назад +7

      I am fan of EE Lightning too. Here is interesting fact: During British Airways trials in April 1985, Concorde was offered as a "target" to NATO fighters including F-15 Eagles, F-16 Fighting Falcons, F-14 Tomcats, Mirages, and F-104 Starfighters - but only Lightning XR749, flown by Mike Hale and described by him as "a very hot ship, even for a Lightning", managed to overtake Concorde on a stern conversion intercept. So saddled rocket do it. Yeehaaaw

    • @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus
      @fantabuloussnuffaluffagus 2 года назад

      @@jozomrkva This story smells a bit sus, the Eagle can outclimb the Lightning (The Eagle set a time to climb record to 12,000m in 59.38s and climbed to 25,000m in 161.02s) by a comfortable margin and is also faster by a comfortable margin. If the Eagle failed where the Lightning succeeded, I suspect the Eagle driver wasn't trying. Same for the Starfighter, the top speed was about the same as the Lightning, but while the Lightning took "under 3 minutes" (per Wikipedia) to climb to 11,000m the Starfighter held the time to climb record for 12,000m @ 99.90 seconds (also per Wikipedia).

  • @InsaneHunter01
    @InsaneHunter01 2 года назад +4

    Avro Arrow in the 2m25s slot, was only tested to to Mach 1.98. And that was without afterburners on. No one really knew how fast it could fly.

    • @superzentredi
      @superzentredi 2 года назад

      And as I understand it, it was waiting on newer better engines that hadn't been manufactured yet. What a beautiful plane, why is it we can't have anything good in Canada?

    • @InsaneHunter01
      @InsaneHunter01 2 года назад +1

      @@superzentredi Blame the Americans for tricking the Canadian Govt that their missile system would make fighters of any type obsolete. The Americans lied, the Missile system didn't work, or was not the thing they promised. Basically a piece of shit paper weight that didn't get the missile it was meant for or didn't work at all in sever snow storms that are common across the arctic.

    • @InsaneHunter01
      @InsaneHunter01 2 года назад +1

      @@superzentredi By the way, the 1.98 was an official test speed limit with 3/4 throttle, and no after burners. It was unofficially tested to 2.5 or was it 2.6 at full throttle without after burners.

  • @Kaiyening
    @Kaiyening 2 года назад

    Great video! That logo though 😂
    Had you known…

  • @blacay251
    @blacay251 2 года назад +1

    good video, but missed SAAB 39 Gripen

  • @JanChvojka
    @JanChvojka 2 года назад +8

    Just one question: why is not mentioned Lockheed YF-12A with max. speed Mach 3,35 ? Because is not Russian?

    • @lil_spid
      @lil_spid 2 года назад +2

      Because its not a fighter jet🤨

    • @lil_spid
      @lil_spid 2 года назад +1

      Blackbird is reconnaissance aircraft

    • @covenantor663
      @covenantor663 2 года назад +1

      @@lil_spid YF-12A was an interceptor, designed to carry internal missiles.
      Refer Wikipedia.
      Related but it was not the Blackbird.

    • @stefanszoke1485
      @stefanszoke1485 2 года назад +2

      YF-12A was a pre production prototype, so it could be anything, and that was just a prototype for a generation of recon planes. But these Migs actually flew. And dont worry there were mentioned some US cabage planes too like YF23 which actually had done some serious tests.

  • @Mediavidero
    @Mediavidero 2 года назад +8

    Beyond Mach 2.80 (aprox) thermal shield (and inner fuselage cooling system) is needed. Mig-25 was able to achieve higher speeds (Mach 3.0+), but conditioned by a time limitation at high altitude.

    • @katherineberger6329
      @katherineberger6329 2 года назад +2

      Above Mach 2.8, the MiG-25's engine basically self-destructs.

    • @Mediavidero
      @Mediavidero 2 года назад +1

      @@katherineberger6329 I think it has thermal shield on nose and leading edges. Anyway, of course, it self-destruct above that speed.

    • @katherineberger6329
      @katherineberger6329 2 года назад +1

      @@Mediavidero The problem isn't the airframe, the problem is that the engines are adapted cruise missile engines and not designed for extended runs at high speeds.

    • @Mediavidero
      @Mediavidero 2 года назад +2

      @@katherineberger6329 Tumansky R-15B-300. Some soviet designs was made basically in a try-hard concept.

    • @covenantor663
      @covenantor663 2 года назад +2

      Possibly one plane that wouldn’t have those limitations was the Lockheed YF-12A.
      I’m surprised it wasn’t included!

  • @berman9668
    @berman9668 Год назад

    Estaba deseando ver el mig-25 pensaba que se olvidarian , bravo.

  • @ikiikeitis
    @ikiikeitis 2 года назад

    this is a great video but man... you made a close-up on captain Canada and didn't even show my man Jotaro? you did him dirty xD.

  • @eskercurve
    @eskercurve 2 года назад +8

    A lot of people don't realize that the fastest human flight pilots, besides capsules on re-entry, flew the X-15, to the edge of space. Neil Armstrong flew one and almost skipped off the atmosphere like a stone over water. He only did an emergency maneuver and landed in a different state as a result.

  • @shivaniSharma-nw7hs
    @shivaniSharma-nw7hs 2 года назад +7

    1:44 FUCK-1 Ching-kuo 😂

    • @cs5202000100
      @cs5202000100 2 года назад

      連中華民國也上榜👍👍👍

  • @leMiG31
    @leMiG31 9 месяцев назад

    MiG-25 and SR-71 do be tense rivals

  • @RJ-hm6cz
    @RJ-hm6cz 2 года назад +1

    great video but you forgot Sukhoi Su-30MKI and Sukhoi Su-30MKM

    • @ArieChannel91
      @ArieChannel91 2 года назад

      Ya correct.. Where not listing su 30 fmly

  • @SAFFRON_Alert_
    @SAFFRON_Alert_ 2 года назад +4

    Tejas has speed of 1.8 mach in final operation clearance version update your knowledge.plz

  • @whizkid00000
    @whizkid00000 2 года назад +3

    Too bad the U.S. stopped production of the YF-12. Would definitely be the fastest fighter jet.

  • @muddgrub4402
    @muddgrub4402 Год назад +1

    No F-35? SNAP! I know that they are currently grounded, but does the stigma still exist?

  • @mehrajdindin1770
    @mehrajdindin1770 2 года назад +1

    Very good 👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @MrMcguire89
    @MrMcguire89 2 года назад +9

    F-15 isn't being replaced by the F-22. There are thousands of F-15's in active service and it's platform serves as a superiority fighter who's legacy continues to be one of the best not by its performance alone, but it's ability to adapt to changing technology architecture. Cue in the F-15EX. Also, the two fighters serve different roles. The F-22 plays a sentry role, that coordinates and identifies targets under the safety blanket of stealth, while the F-15's are the long range interceptors who fire and forget. With the advent of the stealth eagle, the F-15EX might replace the F-22 if anything, but both play a major role in modern day air superiority.

    • @steventaylor8785
      @steventaylor8785 2 года назад

      Sounds like you really know your stuff. I thought the F-4 Wild Weasel would be in there somewhere. And the F-22 was a surprise to me. I figured with the super cruise it would be faster than the F-15 Eagle.

    • @429thunderjet2
      @429thunderjet2 2 года назад +2

      @@steventaylor8785 the F4 Phantom was in there. And does anybody really know the Raptors capability?;)

    • @steventaylor8785
      @steventaylor8785 2 года назад +4

      @@429thunderjet2 That's right, I forgot the Raptor's stats were still classified.

    • @jc.1191
      @jc.1191 2 года назад

      Hope they keep f22 as long as possible. Until something superior is made.

    • @429thunderjet2
      @429thunderjet2 2 года назад

      @@jc.1191 Oh I bet they will, the Raptor is big bucks. I believe they were going to build more of them but congress nixed em, too expensive.

  • @alaidsakhalin484
    @alaidsakhalin484 2 года назад +5

    I wonder where in this table the MIG-41 will be in the future ...

  • @seba3tzeapa
    @seba3tzeapa 2 года назад +1

    Great reminder but at the top dogs at Mach 3 + you forget the best fighter/recon aircraft ever built in the cold war that could achieved Mach 3.5 blackbird i dont remember the tag name SR 71 i guess it was called

    • @Tigermoto
      @Tigermoto 2 года назад

      YF-12 would've topped the list had it been made (by the amount of prototypes in the video it probably should have.) But the SR-71 was a Strategic Reconnaissance aircraft and not a fighter.

  • @jebediahgentry7029
    @jebediahgentry7029 2 года назад +1

    Great video, but is the funeral home music really necessary?

  • @dreamr616
    @dreamr616 2 года назад +3

    They forgot to include the A-12 “Archangel” as THE fastest fighter jet in this list at well over Mach 3+. Although it was conceived and operated by the CIA, it was technically designed as a single seat interceptor before the SR-71 was developed. It was definitely at the very pinnacle of this list. Huge miss on their part!

  • @BionicRusty
    @BionicRusty Год назад

    Love the tribute to Top Gun for the F-14.
    Still the most beautiful plane ever produced.
    ❤️🤍💙
    Great video. 👏👏

  • @fightingfalcon1986
    @fightingfalcon1986 2 года назад +5

    You forgotten to mention the fastest of all, the experimental interceptor Lockheed YF-12, a interceptor fighter derived from the SR-71 Blackbird.

  • @rudrachahar6587
    @rudrachahar6587 2 года назад

    Great video 👍☺️👍👍

  • @Dwiimor
    @Dwiimor Год назад

    I noticed some aircraft are not added to this list, interesting video thou

  • @locknload9143
    @locknload9143 2 года назад +6

    The FoxBat only reached 3.2 one time. It's average speed is more around 2.6. But one hell of an aircraft with a ceiling height or 86,000 only 2nd to the SR 71. If they were smart, they would upgrade their avionics and weapons considering they have 110 of them in service. Then, only then they could brag a bit because we all know there stealth stinks!
    I still love my F-15!

    • @sicksixgamer2694
      @sicksixgamer2694 2 года назад +1

      They were smarter than that, they made the Mig-31.

  • @user-zf4ct8se8b
    @user-zf4ct8se8b 2 года назад +7

    The Su-57 has a cruising speed without afterburning. The maximum speed of this fighter is almost 2.6M

    • @andrejlykov6408
      @andrejlykov6408 Год назад

      The Su-57 is expected to reach Mach 2.6 upon completion of the new Izdeliye 30 engine in 2027. Currently, the maximum speed of this aircraft is Mach 2.0. These claims are very doubtful, because even the new engine for the Su-57 will be 9% weaker than F-22`s Pratt & Whitney f119.

  • @Darkhorse393
    @Darkhorse393 2 года назад +1

    Glad to see the Arrow

  • @jimbogymbo6710
    @jimbogymbo6710 2 года назад

    Love it ,captain canuk in his Arrow.

  • @Rick2010100
    @Rick2010100 2 года назад +31

    The topspeed is today mostly irrelevant, supercruise counts. Supercruise means that the jet can travel at Mach 1 without afterburner, because the afterburner drastically reduces the range by burning giant amounts of fuel. Today oposing fighter jets in combat fire also rockets at each other from a far distance. In this case counts from wich far distance on the rockets could be fired and how precise did they find their target. Figher jet dogfights are a thing of the past.

    • @eVolution2665
      @eVolution2665 2 года назад +6

      The faster you go the further and the more precise your rocket can reliably hit its target. Beyond visual range combat is all about bleeding the rockets speed. To call topspeed irrelevant is very far from the truth (imo) and the high topspeed of the F-15 compared to it's rivals combined with the amraam-missles which can use that advantage is one of the reasons for her legendary k/d-ratio. Dogfights or merges almost always happen beneath mach-1 so I don't see it's relevance in the argument.

    • @devvytm
      @devvytm 2 года назад +2

      Dogfights are a thing of the pass, eh? So tell me, what are you planning on doing when the tiny amount of missiles your plane can carry runs out? Run back home with your tail between your legs? 😂😂😂😂😂😂There's a reason why most if not all of these "stealth" planes still have guns and/or can add them on if the need arises. To even remotely suggest that dogfights are a thing of the past is to completely ignore the fact that while missiles are capable, missiles can miss and unlike in games you don't have an infinite amount of them to fire. In fact, you'll often find in certain situations that the pilot will save their missiles and use their guns instead.

    • @democrack113
      @democrack113 2 года назад +4

      @@devvytm Can't dogfight if your aircraft got shot down by an AMRAAM.

    • @ydfhlx5923
      @ydfhlx5923 2 года назад +3

      Top speed is not something you use in dogfights. While it isn't as important as it used to be, a faster jet is generally better if all other things were equal. That's because it further increases missile range, allows to more easily dodge opponens' missiles, as well as allows to more easily intercept targets by giving them more time to react.

    • @user-qo9vy5cg7k
      @user-qo9vy5cg7k 2 года назад

      因为做不到 所以不重要

  • @robertgriffin662
    @robertgriffin662 2 года назад +5

    Viggen translates to thunderbolt also it refers to stone axes.

  • @usmanpk9947
    @usmanpk9947 2 года назад

    Flaying samosa Is my favorite one Teja Bhai

  • @4Evren
    @4Evren 2 года назад +1

    Kfir engines ge but great video.

  • @thelegoman1176
    @thelegoman1176 2 года назад +3

    Does an intercepter not count, also u have the yf 23 prototype but not the yf 12 intercepter prototype which is faster than everything here because it's a varient of the a 12 which can go above Mach 3

    • @trenteaston3515
      @trenteaston3515 2 года назад +3

      Yeah I was about to say it was never anything besides a one-off but the sole flying YF-12 could go Mach 3.4 iirc

    • @jayjay53313
      @jayjay53313 2 года назад

      Yeah, also YF-23 never had its top speed recorded because the project has been cancelled before it could get itself a real pre-production prototype with stealth materials coated. Whereas YF-12 is already an actual working aircraft with radar and AIM-47 Super Falcon fitted just few steps from entering active service. F-22 top speed is classified, some believed it could reach Mach 2.54 as per ATF criteria that the aircraft must be faster than F-15C.