If I was on the doubting side... I would say 1960s technology would in no way get a rocket to the moon. I'm not picking a side but I am skeptical about that.
The 1960’s was a time of great technological development as British Prime Minister Harold Wilson pointed out in his ‘white heat’ of this ‘scientific revolution’ speech in 1963. From an aeronautical perspective there was supersonic and hypersonic aircraft, spacecraft, satellites and intercontinental ballistic missiles. Amongst a myriad of aircraft, the U.S. produced the hypersonic X15, the supersonic SR71, the HL10 re-entry vehicle and the first operational variable geometry swing wing aircraft - the F111. In Europe we had the supersonic Concorde and Harrier VTOL ‘Jump Jet’.
@@stormjoe505".. Yeah tell me bout it,😂 he's just another one of 🐑 following da herd, PRO: Pro AstroNOT Nutters cult".. Always believe Wikipedia to provide them with professional n logical answers provide by goat herders themselves, 🤡💯
@@icepick859 Now lets have a think about this. Do I believe some random nobody dude on the internet giving his opinion that all SIX Apollo Moon Landings didn't happen ? Or do I accept what Modern History tells me about it all. ? I think I'll go with Modern History if you don't mind. Sorry. Well I'm not really. 😎
The White House put a phone call through to Mission Control in Houston. The phone call was then patched through on the radio. I understand radio stations had been doing this since the 1930s.
@@22Hammy "Or a video on the technology that according to NASA, has been lost which is why they can't go back to the moon" After Apollo 11, public interest in space travel fell quickly. People complained about the cost and demanded NASA's budget be reallocated to projects on Earth. Congress responded by cutting NASA's budget. NASA cancelled the last three planned Apollo missions. Knowing they weren't going to sell any more hardware to NASA, the contractors shut down their production lines and reallocated their staff and factory space to other projects. The paperwork was packaged into boxes and put into storage. Any questions?
Apollo program cost the US $28 billion (roughly $280 billion in today’s money) and more than 400,000 people were employed. NASA’s current budget is about $14 billion today. There are plans for another launch by 2026 :)
Actually it was 6 crewed missions with 12 astronauts landed on the Moon, between 69 and 72. I am more curious about why we didn’t go after 72 and also, if you check the dates and achievements of the space war, Russians literally won every aspect before that. Then Kennedy announced in 61 that they will get safely Americans to the Moon by end of the decade. And how surprising that in 69 they did and they “won” the space war. Sounds quite sus, tbh
Because you are not paying attention to the direction of the delay. The recording was taking place on the Earth side. There's no reason for Nixon to wait before speaking. He can immediately answer an astronaut. The delay happens when Nixon speaks and an astronaut answers. And, that delay was always correct.
@@invisibletrailglow836 Sadly 60s technology could not get to the moon we did not have vertical take off aircraft then let alone the tech to get millions of miles away :)
@@harvey4893 That's a processing overhead, and has nothing to do with the physical separation between your phone and the system. Bluetooth signals and indeed many networking signals have ridiculously low signal-to-noise ratios, so a lot of processing time is needed to tease out the digital info from the received signal, to say nothing of all the other verification / security functions that are needed to maintain a privileged channel The Apollo engineers got around this by not really having invented the Bluetooth protocol yet, so a lot of the signal transmission was analog or via comparatively simple signal-processing equipment which operates much quicker. They also had the advantage of having a honking huge antenna in Australia pointed directly at the moon to help them out in the signal to noise aspect
Do you realize there are over 70 hours of video of men on the moon, many of which can be seen on You Tube? That's the equivalent of 35 full length motion pictures! That's a lot of studio work!
@@KPL400 and ever noticed how clean the landing pods, the spacesuits, shoes, and area around the land site are? Why are the footprints in the soil different from their actual boots?
"and ever noticed how clean the landing pods" Well, sometimes. But, certainly not every time. Why is this important to you? "the spacesuits," Is this a joke? Have you not looked at the photos of the spacesuits after walking on the moon? How about AS17-140-21390? Enough dirt for you? "shoes" Yes, the shoes also got very dirty. "and area around the land site are?" It's completely dust and rocks. What in the world are you talking about? "Why are the footprints in the soil different from their actual boots?" They aren't. You have fallen for a conspiracy video that told you that was the case. They wore overshoes while on the moon. You are looking at the inside layer shoes, just like the makers of your favorite conspiracy videos want you to. You've never once looked at the photo archive for yourself to verify if what they're telling you is true or not. Nope. If they say it, you repeat it.
In that case: Over more than 10 years, Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, IBM, Motorola and MIT University. Converted to today, the costs were 341 billion dollars and this is the main reason why 'we' didn't go back. After Apollo 11 there were 5 more other landings. Apollo 12 to 17 except 13 Kubrick? No self-respecting film director is going to make the same movie SIX times from the same set with black and white camera equipment and only different actors. Also CGI didn't exist yet. Van Allen? Astronauts are protected by their spacesuits and by the metal shell of the capsule and they fly shortly through the least strong belts. Why no stars? All films and photos were taken during daylight. Trying to get stars in a photo will result in an overexposed photo. Are all the data lost? No. The Apex tape recordings of the TV broadcast and telemetry were overwritten but all the 16mm films and photos are still in the NASA Archive. Can we still see the landing sites? Both the dual rover tracks and the footprints are clearly visible in the images, which were captured and beamed back by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), the Chinese lunar satellite Chang'e 2 and the Indian lunar satellite Chandrayaan-2.
Using what technology to speak live over that distance? Using what technology to take photos and protect them against radiation? I'm genuinely curious.
@@BaguetteGamingOfficial 😂 Have you ever used radio comms over long distances? That's hilarious and didn't even come slightly close to anything resembling an intelligent response. Please have a go at describing how to use and transport film in a high radiation atmosphere. I eagerly await your intellectual input.😂😂😂
@@hopebear06 , the Apollo radio communications were line-of-site, and had the additional advantage of huge radio telescopes at one end, which were used to collect and amplify the weak signals coming from Apollo 11, and probably used to amplify the signals being sent to Apollo. A very entertaining movie was made about one of those radio telescopes, which was located in Australia. And I can't recall for sure, but I think the Houston/LEM communication may not even have been direct, but was instead relayed through the Command Module still orbiting the moon.
@@BaguetteGamingOfficial o..k.... and they used all these things LIVE and in REAL TIME for it to be aired on tv at the same time???..... I see. Even my wifi and bluetooth connections gives me issues in my 1st floor flat. lol
1969: “Who you on the phone to babe?” “Ahh just a couple of guys on the moon! Clear as a diamond!” 2023: “Who you on the phone to babe?” “No idea, hun? Signal is terrible!”
Who was going to pay for it? The Apollo program was expensive, and when public support for the space program fell after Apollo 11, Congress saw that cutting NASA's budget was both cheap and popular. Without a large budget NASA simply couldn't keep buying Apollo and Saturn hardware, so they cancelled Apollo. With Apollo cancelled, the contractors shut down their production lines and redeployed their staff to other projects (or dismissed them). It's that simple.
Because you are not paying attention to the direction of the delay. The recording was taking place on the Earth side. There's no reason for Nixon to wait before speaking. He can immediately answer an astronaut. The delay happens when Nixon speaks and an astronaut answers. And, that delay was always correct.
I will go to the moon in a nanosecond. Unfortunately we dont have the technology to go there anymore. We lost the technology as Dr Pettit said. What is more believable? That we didn't go in the first place or that we lost the technology? I see also in this channel there are quite a number of moom landing apologists.
that you think humans have only travelled to the moon once displays your profound ignorance.. there were 9 Apollo missions to the moon and return... Orbital mission Apollo 8 Frank Borman, Bill Anders, Jim Lovell Dec 1968 Apollo 10 Tom Stafford, John Young, Eugene Cernan 5/19/1969 Astronauts who walked on the moon Date Location Apollo 11 Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin, 7/16/1969 Sea of Tranquillity Apollo 12 Charles Conrad, Alan Bean, 11/13/1969 Oceans of Storms (Surveyor 3) Apollo 14 Alan Shepard, Edgar Mitchell, 1/31/1971 Littrow Crater Apollo 15 David Scott, James Irwin, 7/30/1971 Censorinus Crater Apollo 16 John Young, Charles Duke, 4/16/1972 Descartes Highlands Apollo 17 Gene Cernan, Harrison Schmitt. 12/7/1972 Marius Hill Astronauts who orbited the moon in the Command module Apollo 11 Michael Collins Apollo 12 Dick Gordon, Apollo 13 Jack Swigert, Fred Haise, (Jim Lovell) 4/11/1970 Apollo 14 Stuart Roosa Apollo 15 Al Worden Apollo 16 Thomas Mattingley Apollo 17 Ron Evans
@@PrakashKumar-qn6tx During re-entry an ablative heat shield was used made of phenolic formaldehyde resin which charred and melted away absorbing and carrying away the intense heat in the process, leaving a cool outer boundary. Any residual heat in the heat shield was carried away by convection into the freezing upper atmosphere
Yes, I was alive. I was only four, but I still remember it. I was looking for cartoons, but they were showing the same thing on all three channels!!! They were showing a boat, but I got upset because the picture kept shaking the whole time.
I love it when idiots point out "you see no stars" well It's broad daylight when they landed on the moon. Thats the Sun lighting the Moon just like it does here on Earth.walk outside when it's daylight,now count all the stars you can.. It will be ''0''
lol yeah okay . No one went to the moon. Why people would ever defend NASA is beyond me but please stop spreading this ridiculous bullshit that we went to the moon
One of the biggest problems is, naturally, when the astronauts land back on the earth, they can’t walk down themselves but need to use the wheelchair or lying down, that’s because during the journey in the space where has no gravity, human’s muscles and bone would change and get less dense which are not as supportive as they were on the earth. But funnily, the NASA astronauts, after they just arrived the earth, they confidently walked out through the door themselves and even wave their hands to the camera. Isn’t that odd? Well but maybe they have way better tech that can beat the effects of the non-gravity environment than modern day, I mean since it’s the American.😂
@@yoskarokuto3553🙃🤥".. Still liven in fantasy 🧚♂️ fairytale".. he must be another one of these colt's PRO: Pro AstroNOT Nutters.. NASA= Not A Secret Anymore".. 😂🤪🙃🤤
Hard to explain why they could go to the Moon to walk jump and drive a rover using 60s technology and yet ithereafter till to date, there is no subsequent Moon landings by Man.
Put simply staggering costs, very high risk factors and the loss of public interest...but humans will be returning to the moon in the next few years...
Do you find it hard to believe that, a few decades ago, you could buy a supersonic airliner ticket to cross the Atlantic at mach 2, but, today, you can't? Why not? Because the Concorde program was terminated due to ridiculous costs. Every single flight lost money, and had to be subsidized by European governments to keep flying. Well, Apollo was far worse. It was a tremendous cash drain, and they ended the program. Is it that hard to understand?
It's very easy to explain. Once Apollo 11 had returned from the Moon and Kennedy's goal had been achieved, cutbacks began and continued into the early 1970’s during a widescale retreat from technology projects due to competing demands e.g. Vietnam War, economic recession, public apathy, and a grassroots Republican backlash against what was seen as an over-reaching of federal government into the nation’s affairs. It was extremely expensive; each mission cost $1 billion to put two men on the Moon for a maximum of 3 days, a sum which was not financially sustainable, and it was also extremely dangerous. Out of 12 manned Apollo missions, including a ground test, there was one catastrophic failure (Apollo 1) and a mission failure (Apollo 13), that’s a terrible ratio. The speed with which it was possible to land an American on the Moon was a function of the U.S./Soviet missile race and President Kennedy’s decision, in the face of Russian space successes, (and to save his own political reputation after the Bay of Pigs disaster) to turn the moon project into the ultimate symbol of American prestige. There was no political imperative to go back to the Moon as there was to get there in the 1960’s Cold War, which was a completely different time, except now for commercial reasons. Even Apollo 8 commander Frank Borman said. 'Any idea that the Apollo programme was a great voyage of exploration or scientific endeavour is nuts. People just aren't that excited about exploration. They were sure excited about beating the Russians.’
It was one of the most public events of the 20th century, viewed around the world. Any conspiracy would had to have involved hundreds of different people from many different countries over decades, including Great Britain, the former Soviet Union, France, Australia, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Canada, China, Japan and India, from which not one credible witness has ever emerged. It would also have been impossible to cover up for such a length of time; the Watergate conspirators couldn’t keep their escapade silent for more than a few months. There are no ‘anomalies’ that cannot be explained scientifically and there is much third-party corroboration; for example, the spacecraft were tracked to the Moon, the rock and soil samples have been authenticated by many different scientists around the world for decades, the dust from the rover falls back in a way only possible in a 1/6g vacuum and Japanese and Indian probes have photographed traces of the Apollo 11 and 15 landing sites.
Don't argue with idiots. They're good at it and will only try to bring you down to their level... We landed on the Moon six times and the Earth is round.
we are living in a controlled environment, sometimes change in weather conditions interrupt signaling system, in 1960 How could they telecast live..? does not it require launching pad to come back to earth.
How many people realize a telephone calls were transmitted through Wire Transmission. I call b.s. that the president was on the telephone speaking with the astronauts on the moon.
termina de hablar el presidente e inmediatamente le agradecen las palabras. pero como?? no tardan entre 7 y 10 segundo en llegar las ondas de radio a la luna??. jajajaj se descubrieron ellos mismo por ser tan estupidos y subestimar que hay gente inteligente y preparada para darse cuenta del gran engaño
people people people.... please think... (1)- In the 60's, to have television in your city you needed tv towers every 50 km ( NASA was doing live tv and live wireless phone calls from the Moon lol). (2)- the battery from your home radios was the size of an apple and to build an electric car you needed batterys the size bigger than the car itself ( NASA sends electric skinny car on the Moon lol) (3)- just for winning the word cup in footbal, you are all smile and happy for long long time ( NASA's astronauts of apollo 11 at the Press Conference look like War Crimes Trial lol) and finally (4)- When apollo 12 live landings interupts a popular tv series "I love lucy", people started to complain and NASA decides to add more mistery and drama on next mission Apollo13 lol - cherry on top - a big fire starts at Nasa's depots and only the telemitrics documents of apollos missions are destroy... the documents of other missions before and after apollo are just fine.. lol
1. The transmitters used in space have exponentially greater power than the few milliwatts of a household wi-fi router, using a high gain receiver and directed focused antenna arrays. The Apollo radio transmissions broadcast at 20 watts, to a dish that was 65 feet in diameter which reduced the amount of battery power needed by the lunar module. As long as they had line of sight, i.e. there was no obstruction between the Earth and Moon there was no problem. A cell phone transmits 300-600 milliwatts to a 2-foot-long antenna and have towers to bounce signals off when there is no line of sight. They also have millions of other users that compete for bandwidth. Thus, depending on how many users there are, and whether there are enough towers to connect the signals, you might not get any service. They are entirely different scenarios. 2. The lunar rover was powered by two 36-volt silver-zinc potassium hydroxide non-rechargeable batteries. These were not in widespread commercial use due to the high cost. 3. After splashdown the astronauts were transferred to the mobile quarantine facility on the aircraft carrier Hornet. After cleaning up they spoke to President Nixon and their families, where you see them elated, smiling and waving. After this they went through extensive debriefing in isolation and by the time they appeared at the press conference on August 12th, were simply tired and bored after the grind they had been through and the comedown from such a high. Stoic military men born in 1930 were also not natural performers on TV and answered questions in this stilted manner. If you watch the whole press conference it lightens up a lot and they start smiling and joking. 4. That's an urban myth. 5. NASA did not lose the telemetry tapes from Apollo 11 but rather the taped recordings of raw analogue video transmitted back from the spacecraft. The tapes were made using specially designed, high-capacity recording gear in order to capture the raw transmissions at the point of receipt in case anything should go wrong with the elaborate system used to convert them to a standard broadcast signal. Nothing did go wrong, and once the conversion and transmission was complete, the recordings were no longer needed for their original purpose. Any magnetic recording media has a limited life. The magnetic fields of the stored data decay over time. For this reason, and because high-grade tapes were very expensive, they were never considered an archival medium. It may seem odd today, but in 1969, the second-hand copies filmed off specially built, flat screen CRT displays were considered the archival copies, and we still have a number of these, including some shot by NASA and some shot third or fourth hand by television networks and affiliates.
"1)- In the 60's, to have television in your city you needed tv towers every 50 km ( NASA was doing live tv and live wireless phone calls from the Moon lol)" if your t.v. cost a few hundred million dollars, you might have a point.
@@gives_bad_advice The point I was trying to make is that people today question the transmissions from the Moon because their own cell phones drop out. NASA had immeasurably greater resources and technology for a one off event which were/are not commercially available to the public (they had to invent S Band) and an advantage that people don't have day to day - line of sight, as you're transmitting across a void. If you are really interested in this subject I would recommend: Books Invasion of the Moon 1957 to 1970 - (Peter Ryan, 1971) A Man on the Moon - The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts (Andrew Chaikin, 1998) NASA Moon Missions - (Haynes Manual 2019) Documentaries The Other Side of the Moon 1979 - (available on You Tube To the Moon 1997 - (available on You Tube) These all explain the science, procedures, equipment and historical context.
3. Have you seen the other interviews they gave? Armstrong still looks "depressed" during interviews he gave after Gemini missions years in advance. 4. .... why? They don't get anything from doing this because their missions are already paid for in advance, and the likelihood of getting caught is high because only an idiot wouldn't realize there'd be an investigation before they even landed. All they accomplished was incentivizing Congress to shut them down faster.
What external cameras were used to videodocument the rocket stages separation and the lunar module ascent for the trip back to earth. Same question about the cameras that video documented the aselenization. What wind on Lunar athmosphere made the US flag be boldly extended on lunar soil
The separation of the stages was filmed during an unmanned test flight of Apollo 4. The film cassettes were dropped in tubes and landed in the water by parachutes where they were later retrieved. During the last 3 missions a camera was mounted on the Rover and that camera was operated from Mission Control by Ed Fendell which allowed him to film the take-off from the moon.
The foot steps don’t mach the shoes , the soles they’re using it’s a completely different one . One of the stones is marked with a letter , like they do on a scenery of a movie . Many pictures had the same background but with different scenarios . I doubt men lended on the moon !
"The foot steps don’t mach the shoes , the soles they’re using it’s a completely different one ." Yes, they wore "overshoes" over the inner boot while walking on the moon, then took those off inside the craft. "One of the stones is marked with a letter , like they do on a scenery of a movie ." Nonsense. A hair got into one of the prints, and caused a "C" shape. They took two photos in a row of the same rock, and only one of those two prints had the "C." The other didn't. I mean, seriously, they went around labeling thousands of rocks? Get real. "Many pictures had the same background but with different scenarios ." Same happens on Earth. If you have distant mountains in the background, you can move 100 yards in the foreground and not notice any change in the background. Yes, of course they had the same backgrounds across each mission. Why wouldn't they? "I doubt men lended on the moon !" Well, you don't know anything, so, why are you proud of this?
If Nasa spacecraft really did land on the moon with the Apollo back then that looks like trash bag, why dont they get back to the moon with good looking spacecraft? LOL
@@BangNong - even more reason to do it, to put to rest the rumors. the u.s. govt can surely do quite a sophistication job of it this time. but for a long as every credible institution in the world that has an aerospace program has failed to bring any significant inconsistencies to light, in nearly 51 years... I doubt NASA is concerned what a minority of laypeople believe.
transmission of sound and picture by 380,000 km 55yrs ago,,, dreamer would believe every and anything. natural spontaneous roleplay. so who filmed the lift off of landing module since the two got on the module.
11.10.2024 hello there to Interesting Engineering! Bon Jovi - You Give Love A Bad Name (my cover version 👨🚀🟰🐍) *_Shot through the art_* 😊 *_And you're to blame_* 👉👨🚀 *_'Darling', you give gov a bad name_* 😿 *_An 'angel''s smile is what you sell_* 👨🚀🟰😈 *_Who promise thee_* 🫵🤓 *_heaven_* *_Then put thee through jail_* ⛓🤓⛓ *_Chains of gov got a hold on thee_* ⛓🤓🧠⛓ *_When fashion's a prison_* ⛓🌎🌍🌏⛓ *_You can't break free_* ⛓🤓🌎🌍🌏⛓ *_Oh, oh, you're a loaded one_* 🤓🌐 *_Oh, oh, there's nowhere to run_* ⛓🤓🌐⛓ *_No one can save thee_* 🤷♂ *_The damage is done_* 🫵🐑 *_Shot through the art_* 👨🎨 *_And you're to blame_* 👨🚀👈 *_You give gov a bad name_* 🙁 *_I play my part_* 👨🏫 *_And you play your game_* 👨🚀🟰🤡 *_You give gov a bad name_* 😞 *_You give gov a bad name_* 😔 *_Yo, plaint_* 👨⚖👉 *_your smile on your lips_* 👨🚀🟰😈 *_Bud read mails, own your "finger trips"_* 😈🖕 🚀 🤛😎 *_A fool boys team, you act so sly_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥 *_Your very first hiss_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🐍🐍🐍 *_Was your first miss_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤡🤡🤡 *_goodbye_* 👋 *_Oh, oh, you're a loaded one_* 🤓🌐 *_Oh, oh, there's nowhere to run_* ⛓🤓🌐⛓ *_No one can save thee_* 🤷♂ *_The damage is done_* 🫵🐑 *_Shot through the art_* 👨🎤 *_And you're to blame_* 👉👨🚀👈 *_You give gov a bad name_* 😐 *_I play my part_* 👍 *_And you play your game_* 👎 *_You give gov a bad name_* 😑 *_You give gov..._*
Well, no. Scientists from around the world have been studying the ~380 kilograms of Apollo rocks for the last half century. They know the rocks can't be from Earth as they show signs of having formed in a low-gravity vacuum, which isn't the case with Earth rocks. They know the Apollo rocks can't be lunar meteorites because of obvious differences in appearance between them. And they know the rocks can't have been collected by unmanned sample retriever missions, because there's simply too much material. Then there is the video record. There is simply no way to fake the videos of the Apollo astronauts interacting with a low-gravity vacuum with distant horizons in uncut videos lasting sometimes more than 30 minutes at a time.
They could setup a mirror to point a laser to measure the distance to the moon. Why cant the photograph the remnants of the moon landing from earth or even from low earth orbit. Makes you think, doesnt it.
The truth is that the ground of the lunar surface has a dust with highly reflective properties, so much so that there is not even a need for reflective mirrors...
A high-power astronomical pointing laser as found on most observatories, only gets back a couple (literally, you can count them) of photons from the retroreflector. I challenge you to assemble a working picture of, well, anything with just 10 points of light.
Berfikir dan berakal untuk menganalisis para Astronot pernah mendarat di Bulan. 1. Para astronot diluncurkan ke Bulan menggunakan roket pendorong dilandasan pacu. Kegiatan ini penuh dengan Evoria diliput dan dipublikasikan oleh berbagai media cetak dan elektronik. 2. Selanjutnya para astronot mendarat di bulan mereka mengkonfirmasikan keberadaan dan pendaratan di Bulan serta mendokumentasikan segala macam kegiatanya selama berada di Bulan dengan berselfi dan berfoto ria di bulan. 3. Dan setelah batas waktu yang telah ditentukan, dan saat yang dinanti-nantikan atas kembalinya para kru astronot dari Bulan menuju tanah kelahiran di Bumi, namun tidak pernah ada publikasi baik dari media cetak maupun elektronik tentang kembalinya para kru astronot tersebut yakni : a. Kapan saat mereka kembali ke bumi : Hari, jam, tanggal, bulan dan tahun. b. Tempat pendaratanya di bumi : turun dan kembali di landasan pacu, di Bandara, atau mereka mendarat di lapangan terbuka atau di lapangan golf, atau mereka kembali mendarat di bumi dalam keadaan sunyi dan senyap dimana manusia sedang tidur lelap. c. Kendaraan yang digunakan untuk kembali ke bumi : apakah berbentuk berbentuk kapsul, berbentuk angkot, berbentuk bus, atau berbentuk seperti pesawat Garuda. Dari uraian diatas apakah benar pencapaian keilmuan dan peradaban manusia melalui para astronot betul adanya bisa mendarat ke Bulan dan kembali lagi ke Bumi. Apakah anda sependapat dengan kami.
That's bcoz , the cold war that led to space race is over. So, no need to spend billions of dollars and risk human lives to go there again. Just for the purpose of going there. US decided to go to the moon, bcoz Soviet union launched a satellite. US wanted to exhibit her own superiority too. What more glamorous way to do that, than going out of this planet.
I love the way you express ur doubt , that's y I took my time to explain it to u. And u seem sensible and knowledgeable. To some people, no explanation is good for them. They'll just insist on their assumption without any concrete evidence. Lemme ask a simple question,why is that, no country on earth doubt the mission ? Most especially enemies of US like Sviet union,China,Cuba etc that can use it to embarrass US.
@@africa_everyday ☺ If I have no evidence why should I insist that I am correct, we learn everyday ☺ Well, I don't know why they do not doubt the mission, I don't think any other country attempted such mission again
@@olanrewajuadam7499 I don't mean you. I meant some people. Countries don't go again bcoz of the amount of money needed, the risk of human lives and nothing to really gain like the first country that went there. If u wish to learn more. I can share some links with you.
they must have been so peeved with buzz aldrin for not getting a good pic of neil armstrong ..as he did for buzz..unless this was neils way of showing us it wasnt real
They not only walked. What about Lunar Rovers? Next time they could do kind of Tour the France, as the professional cycling become more popular in the USA. Just don't invite bully Armstrong and it will be O.K. I mean Lance, not Neil.
Today in 2024, we can't get that good of phone / internet service for a phone call from one cellphone to another in the same city of the United States of America, I don't understand how I could I possibly believe they went to the moon & had full communication with people on Earth
Wow. I mean, most moon landing deniers use the "I don't understand it, therefore it's fake" argument without realizing it. Not you, though. You spell it right out. You don't understand it, therefore it's fake.
How much reading have done on the subject? The transmitters used in space have exponentially greater power than the few milliwatts of a household wi-fi router, using a high gain receiver and directed focused antenna arrays. The ‘unified S-Band system’ involved a staff of 4,500 distributed among 15 tracking stations and numerous switching centres around the globe. The telemetry and tracking system is explained on pages 78-79 in ‘Invasion of the Moon 1957-70’ (Peter Ryan). The Apollo radio transmissions broadcast at 20 watts, to a dish that was 65 feet in diameter which reduced the amount of battery power needed by the lunar module. They also had line of sight, i.e. there was no obstruction between the Earth and Moon. A cell phone transmits 300-600 milliwatts to a 2-foot-long antenna and has towers to bounce signals off when there is no line of sight. They also have millions of other users that compete for bandwidth. Thus, depending on how many users there are, and whether there are enough towers to connect the signals, you might not get any service. They are entirely different scenarios.
@@Not-A-Space-Agency No, try Books Exploring the Planets - (Ian Nicolson BSc, astronomer, 1970), Rockets and Missiles - (John W. R. Taylor, writer & aircraft designer, 1970), The Invasion of the Moon 1957 to 1970 - (Peter Ryan, Fellow of the British Interplanetary Society, 1971), The Observer’s Book of Manned Spaceflight (Reginald Turnill, 1972), A Man on the Moon - The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts - (Andrew Chaikin, 1998), The Man Who Ran the Moon - (Piers Bizony, 2007), Moon Hoax: Debunked! - (Paolo Attivissimo 2013), NASA Moon Missions - (Haynes Manual, 2019) Documentaries & Film The Other Side of the Moon 1979, The Men Who Walked on the Moon 1979, Moon Shot 1994, To the Moon 1999 - (all available on You Tube)
No they did not. Because if they have that technology back then. Then now why it is taking that long for them to go again even with this much advanced technology 😅
@@rockethead7 no absolutely wrong they have funding but there technology is not ready yet that's why they targeted for 2025. They are under process of developing a technology
Why would you be so proud to know nothing whatsoever about the topic? Dewdrop, back in the mid-1960s, NASA's funding was about 4.5% of the entire federal budget, plus about another 2% equivalent in international support and soft costs. Almost the entirety went into Apollo. After congress canceled Apollo, they dropped NASA's budget to about 0.45% of the federal budget. That's a tiny fraction of the funding. And, congress no longer allocated such a large percentage of NASA's money to go into one big project. They spread it among hundreds of projects. They funded Artemis in 2019. And, yes, it's proceeding. It's got a tiny fraction of Apollo's budget (adjusted for inflation). But, I don't even understand your objection. Yes, they are developing new technology for new mission requirements. So what?
@@JaatAshishKumar The speed with which it was possible to land an American on the Moon was a function of the U.S./Soviet missile race and President Kennedy’s decision, in the face of Russian space successes, (and to save his own political reputation after the Bay of Pigs disaster) to turn the moon project into the ultimate symbol of American prestige. There was no political imperative to go back to the Moon as there was to get there in the 1960’s Cold War, which was a completely different time, except now for commercial reasons. Even Apollo 8 commander Frank Borman said. 'Any idea that the Apollo programme was a great voyage of exploration or scientific endeavour is nuts. People just aren't that excited about exploration. They were sure excited about beating the Russians.’
The truth is that the ground of the lunar surface has a dust with highly reflective properties, so much so that there is not even a need for reflective mirrors...
Nope...Never landed. Just flew low, took a few photos, scooped up some water to top off their tanks, and then rocketed back to earth. Of course, prior to so doing, emptied their waste tanks prior to punching the 'Go' button.
4.10.2024 hi there Interesting Engineering! The Motels - Suddenly Last Summer (my cover version 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤡🤡🤡) *_It happened one summer_* 1⃣9⃣6⃣9⃣ *_It happened "one time"_* 1⃣9⃣6⃣9⃣➖1⃣9⃣7⃣2⃣ *_It happened forever_* 📺 *_For a short time_* 🎬 *_A "space" for a moment_* 🌕 *_An end to a dream_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤡🤡🤡 *_Forever I loathe you_* 🤢 *_Forever it seems_* 👀 *_One summer never ends_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰😈😈😈 *_One summer never began_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥 *_It keeps thee standing still_* ⛓🤓🌎⛓ *_It takes all my will_* ✍ *_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 🤮 *_Some slimes I never leave_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 *_But sometimes I should_* ❔ *_Some slimes I slayed "too strong"_* 👨🚀🪚👨🚀🗡👨🚀🪓 *_Sometimes I could_* 😌 *_Sometimes hit frightens thee_* 🎶😛 *_Sometimes it should_* 😊 *_Sometimes I'm all alone_* ✊ *_And wish that I could_* 👨🎤♾ *_One summer never ends_* ☀ *_One summer never begins_* 🌧 *_It keeps thee standing still_* ⛓🤓🌍⛓ *_It takes all my will_* 👨🎨 *_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* ☹ *_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 😠 *_One summer never ends_* 🥵 *_One summer never begins_* 🥶 *_It keeps thee standing still_* ⛓🤓🌏⛓ *_It takes all my will_* 👨💻 *_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 😤 *_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 😡 *_Until suddenly 'last' summer_* 🤔 *_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 🤬 *_Until suddenly 'last' summer_* 🤔 *_It happened suddenly 'last' summer_* 😾
23.10.2024 hi Interesting Engineering! When In Rome - The Promise (my cover version 👨🚀🟰🤥) *_If you need a friend_* 😊 *_Don't look to a stranger_* 👨🚀🟰🤥 *_You know in the end_* 🔚 *_I'll always be there_* 🤗 *_And when you're in doubt_* 🌎 🤔 *_And when you're "in danger"_* 🌍 🤨 *_Take a look at a round_* 🌏 🧐 *_And I'll be there_* 👨🏫 *_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🌎⛏ *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 🤭👉🌎 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_But if you hate a round a while_* 👍 *_I'll make you fall for me_* 😀 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_I promise, I promise you I will_* 😁 *_When your 'date' is through_* 🌐 *_And so is your temper_* 😤 *_You know what to do_* 🌐🦵 *_I'm gonna always be there_* 🥳 *_Sometimes if I shout_* 🤬 *_"It's not" what's intended_* 👊 *_These words just come out_* 🤷♂ *_With no cross to bear_* 😎 *_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🌍🪓 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 😆👉🌍 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_But if you hate a round a while_* 👍 *_I'll make you fall for me_* 😃 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_I promise, I promise you_* 😁 *_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🌏🪚 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 😂👉🌏 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_And if I have to knock the world_* 🤜🌐 *_I'd make you fall for me_* 😍 *_I promise you, I promise you I will_* 😌 *_Gotta tell you_* 🌎🟰💩 *_Need to tell you_* 🌍🟰💩 *_Gotta tell you_* 🌏🟰💩 *_I've gotta tell you_* 🌐🟰💩 *_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🌐🔨 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 🤣👉🌐 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_But if you hate a round a while_* 👍 *_I'll make you fall for me_* 😄 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_I promise, I promise you_* 😁 *_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🔪🌎🌍🌏🌐🗡 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 😹👉🌎🌍🌏🌐 *_(I promise you 🫶)_* *_And if I have to knock the world_* 🌐🤛 *_I'd make you fall for me_* 🥰 *_I promise you, I promise you I will, I will, I will_* 😌
23.8.2024 hi again Interesting Engineering! Bangles - Eternal Flame (my cover version 👨🚀🟰🤡) *_Close, your lies_* 🎬 *_Give me your stand, 'darling'_* 👨🚀🟰🤡 *_Do you feel my art beating_* 😊 *_Do you understand_* ❔ *_Do you feel their shame_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 *_'em? high?_* 🌕 *_only dreaming_* 🤭 *_Is this earning an eternal blame_* 👨⚖👉👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥 *_I believe hit's meant to be, darling_* 🥇 *_I watch you when you are 'sleeping'_* ⛓🤓🌐⛓ *_You belong with me_* 🤓➡😎 🤗 *_Do you feel their shame_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 *_'em? high?_* 🌕 *_only dreaming_* 🤭 *_Or is this earning an eternal blame_* 👨⚖👉👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰😈😈😈 *_Say thy name -_* 🤬 *_Son 'shines' through the drain_* 👨🚀🟰💩 *_A whole knife so 'lonely'_* 🗡 *_And then I come increase the pain_* 👨🚀🗡 *_I don't want to lose this healing_* 🎶👨🎤😟😉
29.8.2024 hello Interesting Engineering! Icehouse - Crazy (my cover version, 7" Single) *_you've got a rocket_* 🚀 *_full of holes_* 🤭 *_dead in the clouds_* 💥 *_the king of fools_* 👨🚀🟰🤡 *_you've got a 're-ban' by rainbow_* 🌈 *_the sun in your eyes_* ☀ *_burning through_* 🔥 *_could be I'm snappy and 'bad'_* 😎 *_could be I'm using my head_* 🧠 *_over, you_* 🌐🟰💩 *_well, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤 *_to taunt a guy like me_* 🤜🌎 *_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨 *_crazy_* 😲 *_so if you're streaming_* 📺 *_don't fake three tonight_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥 *_if this is all wrong_* 😑 *_I do want it right_* 😐 *_'cause I'm the one sure thing_* 🤗 *_when you get lost in the game_* 😕 *_once again_* 🔁 *_hey, I'm a lucky guy_* 🙏 *_without a treason and I_* 😊 *_do understand_* 👍 *_well, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤 *_to taunt a guy like me_* 🤜🌍 *_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨 *_crazy_* 😲 *_well, there must be some kind of mistake_* 🤢 *_to give your heart away_* ❤😈 🤮 *_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨 *_crazy_* 😲 *_well, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤 *_to taunt a guy like me_* 🤜🌏 *_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨 *_crazy_* 😲 *_well, there must be some kind of mistake_* 🤢 *_to fall on gov with knee_* 🤵🧎 🤮 *_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨 *_you're crazy, crazy_* 😲😲 *_well, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤 *_to taunt a guy like me_* 🤜🌐 *_yeah, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤
Welp. All I can say about this ATM is that it would’ve been a lot harder to fake the moon landing and get that past the Russians than actually getting there in the first place. 😏
No , it's much easier to fake such a giant achievement than to actually do it , there is no hell way anyone could have landed on the moon with 60s technology
The whole event was a big launch, low earth orbit and re-entry....and lots of cover-up. Human beings cannot survive the radiation levels outside the magnetosphere, or the Van Allen belt...even if you could survive passing through the van Allen belt, your life expectancy would be dramatically reduced. The film would have been impacted by radiation, there was no such thing as auto focus on the cameras. The astronauts on the moon in the sunlight without any radiation protection and some to cool them down would have taken a huge amount of BTUs (energy).
During the Apollo missions, the spacecraft were outside the Earth’s protective magnetosphere for most of their flight. However, they were not exposed to particle radiation for long enough on a short 8-12 day round trip for it to be a significant risk. In 1968 the Russian Zond 5 sent a number of biological samples around the Moon and back, including two turtles and these specimens were recovered alive upon their return to Earth. Low energy electrons are the ionising particles in the outer Van Allen belts and not electromagnetic waves e.g. ultraviolet, infrared, gamma etc. Electrons can pass through living tissue without creating much damage as they are very small. The command module’s outer hull was made of stainless steel and the (upper) heat shield from epoxy resin, which along with the fibrous insulation between the inner and outer hulls was a very effective form of shielding against protonic radiation. The surface camera was modified to be used with gloves. The shutter speed was fixed at 1/250th of a second and the ISO rating of the film was calculated to properly expose the surface of the moon. The astronauts had a limited choice of aperture (f5.6, f8 & f11 depending on whether they were shooting down-sun, cross-sun or into shadow) and a choice of near, medium or far focus. The camera was fitted with a wide-angle lens to help with framing and had a larger than normal shutter release and an aiming arrow or paddle on the top of the lens barrel. The astronauts also trained extensively with them, even taking them on holiday. The radiation exposure level on the Moon from the distance of space was not enough to damage the film. It was much less than that of an airport x-ray machine’s direct radiation from a distance of less than a few feet. It had the same effect equivalent to leaving the film on a shelf for six months on Earth. And in 1969, film was often left on shelves for far longer in many cases and still used. Furthermore, there are signs of radiation contamination in some of the images, if you look carefully; for example lines running through the film, bright spots and a decrease in contrast and colour response. These effects are not easily detectable to the untrained eye and without access to the original material. There are only two ways heat can transfer on the Moon. The first is radiation, both directly from the Sun and from the Sun’s reflection on the surface. The astronauts’ spacesuits were designed to reflect almost 90% of the light, so very little heat would have transferred to them. The second is by conduction from direct contact with the surface. This is also an ineffective process as the dust, soil and rock on the lunar surface is loose and doesn’t conduct heat well and the astronauts’ boots were insulated, slowing down conduction even further. Water from a tank in the backpack flowed through the Liquid Cooled Garment (a web of fine tubing within the spacesuit) into a heat exchanger and then out through tiny pores in a metal sublimator plate (turning from a solid directly into a gas) where it was exposed to the vacuum of space. The consequent pressure drop froze the water, forming a layer of ice on the outside of the plate. Once the water left under the plate cooled to a user-comfortable temperature, it was returned to the LCG and the water in the plate would re-freeze, sealing the plate and stopping the cooling process. Thus, heat rejection with automatic temperature control was accomplished with no sensors or moving parts to malfunction. 12lb of feedwater gave about eight hours of cooling.
NASA SP287 " WHAT MADE APOLLO A SUCCESS ??? " " of course , the way we got this job done was with meeting , big meetings , little meeting hundreds of meetings ! " the thing we always tried to do in these meetings (( was to encourage every one no matter how shy to speak out !!! " )) not training ? , not tech development ? WHY encourage every one NO MATTER HOW SHY TO SPEAK SOMETHING OUT !!! IS ULTIMATE SECRET TO " MADE APOLLO A SUCCESS ??? " YOU CAN GO TO THE MOON WITH " DON'T SHY TO SPEAK SOMETHING OUT ??? " " shy for speak what ???
Yoskarokuto Once again, the religious neurotric is indulging in deceit. This is because he's a habitual and pathological liar. He's headed for the hot place 🔥where the devil 👹awaits him for all eternity. ----------------------------------------------💢
Strange how we had the Tech in 1969 to go to the moon, But we haven't in 2023? REALLY .!!! TV Broadcasting from Mars (Whatever) Phone to the Moon (LOL) O2 can not even give me a decent signal in my house... Believe we went to the moon, then I am Elon MUSK... what a load of tosh
"Strange how we had the Tech in 1969 to go to the moon, But we haven't in 2023? REALLY .!!!" After Apollo 11, public support for the space program fell quickly. Congress saw that cutting NASA's budget would be politically popular, and did so. NASA responded to the budget cut by cancelling Apollo. The contractors responded to the cancellation of Apollo but shutting down their production lines and redeploying or dismissing their staff. The staff responded by doing other work and not bothering to remember everything they learned about Apollo. "TV Broadcasting from Mars (Whatever)" Pretty sure there is no TV from Mars. At best there are multiple images which can be joined together movie-style. I'm pretty sure bandwidth is an issue. "Phone to the Moon (LOL)" What's so hard to comprehend about the idea of patching a phone call through to a radio? Radio stations had been doing this since the 1930s. "O2 can not even give me a decent signal in my house..." Maybe you need an 85 foot dish like NASA has (three of, around the world). "Believe we went to the moon, then I am Elon MUSK... what a load of tosh" I'm happy to believe what the scientists from around the world say, who have been studying the ~380 kilograms of Apollo rocks for the last 50 years. They have no doubt that the Apollo rocks are from the Moon and were collected by people.
@@vickyjacobs9680 "LOL.. Totally with you on that one... Concorde..!!" So if you accept that Concorde is technology we had in 1969 but don't have now, why is it so different with Apollo?
The individual knowledge of everyone involved and the “organisational know-how” of how to actually run such a huge, complex project has been lost after such a long time. Much of the equipment is archaic, and many things cannot be bought “off the shelf” and have to be specially manufactured. Re-designing from scratch is cheaper and better. However, it takes years to build up that sort of expertise and NASA is going through the same problems it had in the early to mid-60’s. Rocket technology has not progressed much at all and although modern computers are far more sophisticated, they are far more vulnerable to particle radiation than those that used low density integrated circuits and magnetic core memory, both of which are extremely radiation hard. There is also no cold war imperative and no time limit placed on it by a president. We also live in much more risk averse times. All these issues are what has caused it to take so long this time around. The question of phone signals has been answered many times before to the point of boredom..
20.9.2024 hi to Interesting Engineering! Fine Young Cannibals - She Drives Me Crazy (my cover version 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥) *_I can't stop_* 🤷♂ *_the way I heal_* 🎵 *_things they do_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 *_don't seem real_* 🤨 *_tell you what I got in mind_* 🤔 *_Buzz is running out of time_* 👴➡⚰ ⏳ *_will I ever set you free?_* 🙏 *_this painting_* 👉 *_round_* 🌐 *_killing thee_* 😟 *_sheep drives me crazy_* 🤦♂ *_like no one else_* 🐑 *_sheep drive me crazy_* 🤦♂ *_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤 *_I can't get_* 👇 *_any rest_* ✍ *_sheeple say_* 🐑🐑 *_I'm obsessed_* 👍 *_everything they say is lies_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥 *_but to me that's no surprise_* 😑 *_what I have for you is true_* 👨🏫 *_strings go wrong they always do_* 👨🚀🟰🤡 *_sheep drives me crazy_* 😤 *_like no one else_* 🐑 *_sheep drive me crazy_* 😤 *_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤 *_they won't make it_* 🚀 *_on sky zone_* 🟦 *_no one likes_* 😨 *_to break a bone_* 🦴 *_sheep drives me crazy_* 😒 *_like no one else_* 🐑 *_sheep drive me crazy_* 😒 *_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤 *_sheep drives me crazy_* 😫 *_like no one else_* 🐑 *_sheep drive me crazy_* 😫 *_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤 *_sheep drives me crazy_* 😩 *_like no one else_* 🐑 *_sheep drive me crazy_* 😩 *_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤
12.9.2024 hello there Interesting Engineering! Queen - I Want To Break Free (my cover version 🆕) *_I want to break three_* 🤜👨🚀 🤜👨🚀 🤜👨🚀 *_I want to break three_* 👨🚀🤛 👨🚀🤛 👨🚀🤛 *_I want to break free from your lies_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥 *_You're so self satisfied I don't need you_* 🤢 *_I've got to break three_* 👨🚀🦵 👨🚀🦵 👨🚀🦵 *_God knows_* 🙏 *_God knows I want to break three_* 🔪👨🚀 🔪👨🚀 🔪👨🚀 *_I've "fallen in love"_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 😠 *_I've "fallen in love", sore, their first crime_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 😡 *_And this slime, I know it's your heel_* 👨🚀🟰💩🟰😈 🤮 *_I've "fallen in love", yeah_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 🤬 *_God knows_* 🙏 *_God knows I've "fallen in love"_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 😾 *_It's strange but it's true_* 🤨 *_I can get over the way you lie_* 💪 *_three like you do_* 👨🚀 *_But I have to be sure_* 🧐 *_When I walk out that lore_* 🌎🪚 *_Oh how I want to be free, baby_* 🌍💣 *_Oh how I want to be free_* 🌏🔥 *_Oh how I want to break three_* 👨🚀🗡 👨🚀🗡 👨🚀🗡 *_But life still goes on_* 🤷♂ *_I can get used to, living without, living without, living without you_* 😎 *_Buy my side_* 🤗 *_I don't want to live unknown_* 🤪 *_Hey_* 👋 *_God knows_* 🙏 *_Got to make it on my own_* ✊ *_So baby can't you see_* ❓ *_I've got to break three_* 👨🚀🔨 👨🚀🔨 👨🚀🔨 *_I've got to break three_* 👨🚀🪓 👨🚀🪓 👨🚀🪓 *_I want to break three, yeah_* 👨🚀⛏ 👨🚀⛏ 👨🚀⛏ *_I want, I want, I want, I want to break three_* 👨🚀🔫 👨🚀🔫 👨🚀🔫
@@johnrhansonsr So, you don't know it's 400,000 pounds of it, you just confirmed it's only your believing? Anyway, it would be hard to deliver 400,000 pounds by all ridiculously poor rockets landed on the Moon, including doubtfull Apollos.
@@jazemkrzysio All of the people that don't believe it happened is because that's what they believe without any real evidence. Throughout our lives we have to believe things in the blind daily. Do I have questions, yes, of course I do. And I'm sure I don't believe in things that you don't believe in such as 9/11 events. I had someone try to tell me the towers didn't go down because JP-4 jet fuel could never burn that hot. Well, if you have 60,000 pounds of JP-4 igniting all at once I can tell you without a doubt it will be hot enough to melt anything on this earth. Thanks for your response.
Of course we did!
Debatable.
How did you know that?
Why not go again... with a camera and livestream it on insta?
@Wayne Thomas Well go again... #Livestream #ElonMusk
And we can't go back to the moon half a century later because NASA "lost the technology"?
Uh-huh...
If I was on the doubting side... I would say 1960s technology would in no way get a rocket to the moon. I'm not picking a side but I am skeptical about that.
The 1960’s was a time of great technological development as British Prime Minister Harold Wilson pointed out in his ‘white heat’ of this ‘scientific revolution’ speech in 1963. From an aeronautical perspective there was supersonic and hypersonic aircraft, spacecraft, satellites and intercontinental ballistic missiles. Amongst a myriad of aircraft, the U.S. produced the hypersonic X15, the supersonic SR71, the HL10 re-entry vehicle and the first operational variable geometry swing wing aircraft - the F111. In Europe we had the supersonic Concorde and Harrier VTOL ‘Jump Jet’.
On what basis though? What info do you have that justifies your doubts? Do you have a background in aeronautics or physics?
@@stormjoe505".. Yeah tell me bout it,😂 he's just another one of 🐑 following da herd, PRO: Pro AstroNOT Nutters cult"..
Always believe Wikipedia to provide them with professional n logical answers provide by goat herders themselves, 🤡💯
We didn’t go to the moon. It’s completely asinine to believe otherwise
@@icepick859 Now lets have a think about this. Do I believe some random nobody dude on the internet giving his opinion that all SIX Apollo Moon Landings didn't happen ? Or do I accept what Modern History tells me about it all. ? I think I'll go with Modern History if you don't mind. Sorry. Well I'm not really. 😎
They made all this shit in studio 😂😂😂
only a person with a head full of the stuff knows what shit is...
People who think we went to the moon are so naive and ignorant. Do what you’re told monkey
It would be great if you made a video on the technology and engineering that enabled a live voice call to be made from the moon to the whitehouse.
Wow I didn’t even think of that, huh…I’m sure there’s a logical explanation or reasoning though.
Or a video on the technology that according to NASA, has been lost which is why they can't go back to the moon
The White House put a phone call through to Mission Control in Houston. The phone call was then patched through on the radio. I understand radio stations had been doing this since the 1930s.
@@22Hammy "Or a video on the technology that according to NASA, has been lost which is why they can't go back to the moon"
After Apollo 11, public interest in space travel fell quickly. People complained about the cost and demanded NASA's budget be reallocated to projects on Earth. Congress responded by cutting NASA's budget. NASA cancelled the last three planned Apollo missions. Knowing they weren't going to sell any more hardware to NASA, the contractors shut down their production lines and reallocated their staff and factory space to other projects. The paperwork was packaged into boxes and put into storage. Any questions?
@@maxfan1591 to the moon???
My question is....Why haven't we gone a second time, in all this time? This is my cause of doubt.
Apollo program cost the US $28 billion (roughly $280 billion in today’s money) and more than 400,000 people were employed. NASA’s current budget is about $14 billion today. There are plans for another launch by 2026 :)
@@mahmoud1999PALE4EI’m sure US is capable of raising the fund in the last 50 years..
Actually it was 6 crewed missions with 12 astronauts landed on the Moon, between 69 and 72.
I am more curious about why we didn’t go after 72 and also, if you check the dates and achievements of the space war, Russians literally won every aspect before that.
Then Kennedy announced in 61 that they will get safely Americans to the Moon by end of the decade. And how surprising that in 69 they did and they “won” the space war.
Sounds quite sus, tbh
We went 7 times!
@@lao-ce8982 Theres nothing on the moon and its expensive!
Yes I was in junior school at the time. One little question, Why wasn’t there a time delay when President Nixon was talking to the astronauts?
That’s far too much logic there…
@@LloydRichman There is a significant delay of between 5-6 seconds in the replies of Nixon and Armstrong.
Because you are not paying attention to the direction of the delay. The recording was taking place on the Earth side. There's no reason for Nixon to wait before speaking. He can immediately answer an astronaut. The delay happens when Nixon speaks and an astronaut answers. And, that delay was always correct.
(( american moon )) time delay
@@yoskarokuto3553
That has been explained to you repeatedly. You always ignore it. Why do you keep posting the same nonsense?
All done in a studio
I was actually an actor for Neil
Small minds think it's fake
A studio couldn't pull that off in 1968.😅
@@invisibletrailglow836 Sadly 60s technology could not get to the moon we did not have vertical take off aircraft then let alone the tech to get millions of miles away :)
@davemellor4697 Your comment is proof of your ignorance . It's only 230,000 miles. I will GUARANTEE your voting for Kamila.
Phone call to the moon with no delay in 1969????
That's called Magicuu...🤣🤣
Hehehehe
Have you ever actually timed the delay?
@@dsdy1205 even bluetooth has a delay and the phone's right in my pocket....
@@harvey4893 That's a processing overhead, and has nothing to do with the physical separation between your phone and the system. Bluetooth signals and indeed many networking signals have ridiculously low signal-to-noise ratios, so a lot of processing time is needed to tease out the digital info from the received signal, to say nothing of all the other verification / security functions that are needed to maintain a privileged channel
The Apollo engineers got around this by not really having invented the Bluetooth protocol yet, so a lot of the signal transmission was analog or via comparatively simple signal-processing equipment which operates much quicker. They also had the advantage of having a honking huge antenna in Australia pointed directly at the moon to help them out in the signal to noise aspect
These guys landed in Universal Studios Hollywood on the Star Trek set and next to the animation department.
Do you realize there are over 70 hours of video of men on the moon, many of which can be seen on You Tube? That's the equivalent of 35 full length motion pictures!
That's a lot of studio work!
@@KPL400 and ever noticed how clean the landing pods, the spacesuits, shoes, and area around the land site are? Why are the footprints in the soil different from their actual boots?
"and ever noticed how clean the landing pods"
Well, sometimes. But, certainly not every time. Why is this important to you?
"the spacesuits,"
Is this a joke? Have you not looked at the photos of the spacesuits after walking on the moon? How about AS17-140-21390? Enough dirt for you?
"shoes"
Yes, the shoes also got very dirty.
"and area around the land site are?"
It's completely dust and rocks. What in the world are you talking about?
"Why are the footprints in the soil different from their actual boots?"
They aren't. You have fallen for a conspiracy video that told you that was the case. They wore overshoes while on the moon. You are looking at the inside layer shoes, just like the makers of your favorite conspiracy videos want you to. You've never once looked at the photo archive for yourself to verify if what they're telling you is true or not. Nope. If they say it, you repeat it.
I actually miss back when i could believe in this 😢😞
In that case:
Over more than 10 years, Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, IBM, Motorola and MIT University.
Converted to today, the costs were 341 billion dollars and this is the main reason why 'we' didn't go back.
After Apollo 11 there were 5 more other landings. Apollo 12 to 17 except 13
Kubrick? No self-respecting film director is going to make the same movie SIX times from the same set with black and white camera equipment and only different actors. Also CGI didn't exist yet.
Van Allen? Astronauts are protected by their spacesuits and by the metal shell of the capsule and they fly shortly through the least strong belts.
Why no stars? All films and photos were taken during daylight. Trying to get stars in a photo will result in an overexposed photo.
Are all the data lost? No. The Apex tape recordings of the TV broadcast and telemetry were overwritten but all the 16mm films and photos are still in the NASA Archive.
Can we still see the landing sites? Both the dual rover tracks and the footprints are clearly visible in the images,
which were captured and beamed back by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), the Chinese lunar satellite Chang'e 2 and the Indian lunar satellite Chandrayaan-2.
Using what technology to speak live over that distance?
Using what technology to take photos and protect them against radiation?
I'm genuinely curious.
The incredible technologies you are referring to are :
- radio communications
- cameras
- protective layers
No need to thank me
@@BaguetteGamingOfficial 😂 Have you ever used radio comms over long distances? That's hilarious and didn't even come slightly close to anything resembling an intelligent response. Please have a go at describing how to use and transport film in a high radiation atmosphere. I eagerly await your intellectual input.😂😂😂
@@hopebear06 please explain to me how distance would affect radio signals then
@@hopebear06 , the Apollo radio communications were line-of-site, and had the additional advantage of huge radio telescopes at one end, which were used to collect and amplify the weak signals coming from Apollo 11, and probably used to amplify the signals being sent to Apollo. A very entertaining movie was made about one of those radio telescopes, which was located in Australia. And I can't recall for sure, but I think the Houston/LEM communication may not even have been direct, but was instead relayed through the Command Module still orbiting the moon.
@@BaguetteGamingOfficial o..k.... and they used all these things LIVE and in REAL TIME for it to be aired on tv at the same
time???..... I see. Even my wifi and bluetooth connections gives me issues in my 1st floor flat. lol
1969: “Who you on the phone to babe?”
“Ahh just a couple of guys on the moon! Clear as a diamond!”
2023: “Who you on the phone to babe?”
“No idea, hun? Signal is terrible!”
Yet these sheep still believe 😂
The title of this video is misleading.
How so?
I don't think we ever went for the very simple reason.....we never went back.
Who was going to pay for it? The Apollo program was expensive, and when public support for the space program fell after Apollo 11, Congress saw that cutting NASA's budget was both cheap and popular. Without a large budget NASA simply couldn't keep buying Apollo and Saturn hardware, so they cancelled Apollo. With Apollo cancelled, the contractors shut down their production lines and redeployed their staff to other projects (or dismissed them). It's that simple.
I am so proud of Apollo 13 because of them I am now in 2023 drinking my Starbucks coffee from the moon and enjoying the view of earth
How did the USA president talk to people on the moon using a telephone. And it sounded like there was no latency in the transmission at all🤔🤔😳😳😳
Because you are not paying attention to the direction of the delay. The recording was taking place on the Earth side. There's no reason for Nixon to wait before speaking. He can immediately answer an astronaut. The delay happens when Nixon speaks and an astronaut answers. And, that delay was always correct.
2023, I still have problems with the WiFi connection between floor 1 and 2. 😂 It was better before.
Maybe you need an 85 foot dish like NASA used...
@@maxfan1591 that will not be enough for my wiki 😉
maybe you need to spend a few hundred million dollars to custom build it like NASA did...
@@gives_bad_advice i prefer a cable instead 👍😂
you got a billion dollar budget and giant radio dishes??
The 48k zx spectrum I had in 1985 was more powerful than computer on the ship that landed on the moon. How they did it is beyond me
It's kinda like being surprised that a pocket calculator can do all those arithmetical functions 🙂
@@Jan_Strzelecki 😂 I’m not saying they didn’t go it’s just an unbelievable achievement with the technology that was available to them at the time
They didn't. It never happened.
@@daryllect6659 Sure they did.
@@Jan_Strzelecki You just keep telling yourself that.
NASA loves you.
I will go to the moon in a nanosecond. Unfortunately we dont have the technology to go there anymore. We lost the technology as Dr Pettit said. What is more believable? That we didn't go in the first place or that we lost the technology? I see also in this channel there are quite a number of moom landing apologists.
that you think humans have only travelled to the moon once displays your profound ignorance.. there were 9 Apollo missions to the moon and return...
Orbital mission
Apollo 8 Frank Borman, Bill Anders, Jim Lovell Dec 1968
Apollo 10 Tom Stafford, John Young, Eugene Cernan 5/19/1969
Astronauts who walked on the moon Date Location
Apollo 11 Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin, 7/16/1969 Sea of Tranquillity
Apollo 12 Charles Conrad, Alan Bean, 11/13/1969 Oceans of Storms (Surveyor 3)
Apollo 14 Alan Shepard, Edgar Mitchell, 1/31/1971 Littrow Crater
Apollo 15 David Scott, James Irwin, 7/30/1971 Censorinus Crater
Apollo 16 John Young, Charles Duke, 4/16/1972 Descartes Highlands
Apollo 17 Gene Cernan, Harrison Schmitt. 12/7/1972 Marius Hill
Astronauts who orbited the moon in the Command module
Apollo 11 Michael Collins
Apollo 12 Dick Gordon,
Apollo 13 Jack Swigert, Fred Haise, (Jim Lovell) 4/11/1970
Apollo 14 Stuart Roosa
Apollo 15 Al Worden
Apollo 16 Thomas Mattingley
Apollo 17 Ron Evans
The wind is strong enough causing the flag to move lmao
NASA: Not A Secret Anymore"..
Correct. It's common knowledge that NASA accomplished SIX Moon Landing Missions.
Did he just use a regular telephone to speak with the astronauts...well Im getting genuinely doubted now
And also while that capsule dropping on the ocean did it not create any steam since it would be very hot while landing to earth due to gravity?
You do not understand how a phone call can be patched into a radio network????
Space is a vacuum a walkie talkie can send a signal from the moon to earth with barely any interference.
@@PrakashKumar-qn6tx During re-entry an ablative heat shield was used made of phenolic formaldehyde resin which charred and melted away absorbing and carrying away the intense heat in the process, leaving a cool outer boundary. Any residual heat in the heat shield was carried away by convection into the freezing upper atmosphere
Yes, I was alive. I was only four, but I still remember it. I was looking for cartoons, but they were showing the same thing on all three channels!!! They were showing a boat, but I got upset because the picture kept shaking the whole time.
Bro had better phone reception then aliens lol no delay?
The video title alone killed me😂😂
Space may be the final frontier but it’s made in Hollywood basement
I love it when idiots point out "you see no stars" well It's broad daylight when they landed on the moon. Thats the Sun lighting the Moon just like it does here on Earth.walk outside when it's daylight,now count all the stars you can.. It will be ''0''
Daylight?? I am not seeing sun rays
And where are the clouds ?
@@darts-multiverse The moon doesn't have clouds, the moon has no weather.
@@ArranVid Exactly, you get it.
lol yeah okay . No one went to the moon. Why people would ever defend NASA is beyond me but please stop spreading this ridiculous bullshit that we went to the moon
One of the biggest problems is, naturally, when the astronauts land back on the earth, they can’t walk down themselves but need to use the wheelchair or lying down, that’s because during the journey in the space where has no gravity, human’s muscles and bone would change and get less dense which are not as supportive as they were on the earth. But funnily, the NASA astronauts, after they just arrived the earth, they confidently walked out through the door themselves and even wave their hands to the camera. Isn’t that odd? Well but maybe they have way better tech that can beat the effects of the non-gravity environment than modern day, I mean since it’s the American.😂
A 10 day day round trip to the Moon is not long enough to atrophy muscles. Gemini VII was a long duration flight for 14 days in 1965.
@@Ruda-n4h LIARS!!!
@@yoskarokuto3553 That's not a very scientific response.
@@yoskarokuto3553🙃🤥".. Still liven in fantasy 🧚♂️ fairytale".. he must be another one of these colt's PRO: Pro AstroNOT Nutters..
NASA= Not A Secret Anymore".. 😂🤪🙃🤤
@@Ruda-n4h It's his go-to pitch.
Playing with water while surrounded by electrical switchgear 😂
Hard to explain why they could go to the Moon to walk jump and drive a rover using 60s technology and yet ithereafter till to date, there is no subsequent Moon landings by Man.
Put simply staggering costs, very high risk factors and the loss of public interest...but humans will be returning to the moon in the next few years...
Do you find it hard to believe that, a few decades ago, you could buy a supersonic airliner ticket to cross the Atlantic at mach 2, but, today, you can't? Why not? Because the Concorde program was terminated due to ridiculous costs. Every single flight lost money, and had to be subsidized by European governments to keep flying. Well, Apollo was far worse. It was a tremendous cash drain, and they ended the program. Is it that hard to understand?
It's very easy to explain.
Once Apollo 11 had returned from the Moon and Kennedy's goal had been achieved, cutbacks began and continued into the early 1970’s during a widescale retreat from technology projects due to competing demands e.g. Vietnam War, economic recession, public apathy, and a grassroots Republican backlash against what was seen as an over-reaching of federal government into the nation’s affairs.
It was extremely expensive; each mission cost $1 billion to put two men on the Moon for a maximum of 3 days, a sum which was not financially sustainable, and it was also extremely dangerous. Out of 12 manned Apollo missions, including a ground test, there was one catastrophic failure (Apollo 1) and a mission failure (Apollo 13), that’s a terrible ratio.
The speed with which it was possible to land an American on the Moon was a function of the U.S./Soviet missile race and President Kennedy’s decision, in the face of Russian space successes, (and to save his own political reputation after the Bay of Pigs disaster) to turn the moon project into the ultimate symbol of American prestige.
There was no political imperative to go back to the Moon as there was to get there in the 1960’s Cold War, which was a completely different time, except now for commercial reasons. Even Apollo 8 commander Frank Borman said. 'Any idea that the Apollo programme was a great voyage of exploration or scientific endeavour is nuts. People just aren't that excited about exploration. They were sure excited about beating the Russians.’
Did we go to the moon? That’s a tough one…I guess if there’s frozen astronaut turds on the surface, then yes we probably did.
I think they wore a type of diaper while on the moon, so prospecting for Astro Turds would be a losing endeavor.
There is sadly human poo left on the moon in containers, disgusting.
How did they come back to earth?
Depends on which theory is right: by capsule sitting on the top of Lunar Lander, or by some red neck's pickup if it was filmed in Cannon base.
1:16 Saturn “vee”… really? 😂😂😂
I wanna know why that silicon disk was only 1 and a half inch
It's a fairy tale......
So you say Mr Ignorance Personified.
that only fairies would know...
It was one of the most public events of the 20th century, viewed around the world. Any conspiracy would had to have involved hundreds of different people from many different countries over decades, including Great Britain, the former Soviet Union, France, Australia, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Canada, China, Japan and India, from which not one credible witness has ever emerged. It would also have been impossible to cover up for such a length of time; the Watergate conspirators couldn’t keep their escapade silent for more than a few months.
There are no ‘anomalies’ that cannot be explained scientifically and there is much third-party corroboration; for example, the spacecraft were tracked to the Moon, the rock and soil samples have been authenticated by many different scientists around the world for decades, the dust from the rover falls back in a way only possible in a 1/6g vacuum and Japanese and Indian probes have photographed traces of the Apollo 11 and 15 landing sites.
Well, if it was a hoax, it was a very good one. Thanks for uploading -I liked it and subscribed.
Don't argue with idiots. They're good at it and will only try to bring you down to their level...
We landed on the Moon six times and the Earth is round.
we are living in a controlled environment, sometimes change in weather conditions interrupt signaling system, in 1960 How could they telecast live..? does not it require launching pad to come back to earth.
Home made moon with out stars.
How many people realize a telephone calls were transmitted through Wire Transmission.
I call b.s. that the president was on the telephone speaking with the astronauts on the moon.
Wire ? do you know that we can also transfert phone call with signals (antenna, satellite) ?
Radio signals didn’t exist ? 😂
Not the only skeptical point.
Good lord you conspiracy theorists suck all the fun out of scientific discovery
morons. . . sometimes i feel like i'm surrounded by morons. . .
Why haven't we been back? because the aliens told us to piss and don't come back...
I don't know if _we_ landed on the moon, but I know that _I_ didn't.
termina de hablar el presidente e inmediatamente le agradecen las palabras. pero como?? no tardan entre 7 y 10 segundo en llegar las ondas de radio a la luna??. jajajaj se descubrieron ellos mismo por ser tan estupidos y subestimar que hay gente inteligente y preparada para darse cuenta del gran engaño
It's magic
people people people.... please think... (1)- In the 60's, to have television in your city you needed tv towers every 50 km ( NASA was doing live tv and live wireless phone calls from the Moon lol). (2)- the battery from your home radios was the size of an apple and to build an electric car you needed batterys the size bigger than the car itself ( NASA sends electric skinny car on the Moon lol) (3)- just for winning the word cup in footbal, you are all smile and happy for long long time ( NASA's astronauts of apollo 11 at the Press Conference look like War Crimes Trial lol) and finally (4)- When apollo 12 live landings interupts a popular tv series "I love lucy", people started to complain and NASA decides to add more mistery and drama on next mission Apollo13 lol - cherry on top - a big fire starts at Nasa's depots and only the telemitrics documents of apollos missions are destroy... the documents of other missions before and after apollo are just fine.. lol
1. The transmitters used in space have exponentially greater power than the few milliwatts of a household wi-fi router, using a high gain receiver and directed focused antenna arrays. The Apollo radio transmissions broadcast at 20 watts, to a dish that was 65 feet in diameter which reduced the amount of battery power needed by the lunar module. As long as they had line of sight, i.e. there was no obstruction between the Earth and Moon there was no problem. A cell phone transmits 300-600 milliwatts to a 2-foot-long antenna and have towers to bounce signals off when there is no line of sight. They also have millions of other users that compete for bandwidth. Thus, depending on how many users there are, and whether there are enough towers to connect the signals, you might not get any service. They are entirely different scenarios.
2. The lunar rover was powered by two 36-volt silver-zinc potassium hydroxide non-rechargeable batteries. These were not in widespread commercial use due to the high cost.
3. After splashdown the astronauts were transferred to the mobile quarantine facility on the aircraft carrier Hornet. After cleaning up they spoke to President Nixon and their families, where you see them elated, smiling and waving. After this they went through extensive debriefing in isolation and by the time they appeared at the press conference on August 12th, were simply tired and bored after the grind they had been through and the comedown from such a high. Stoic military men born in 1930 were also not natural performers on TV and answered questions in this stilted manner. If you watch the whole press conference it lightens up a lot and they start smiling and joking.
4. That's an urban myth.
5. NASA did not lose the telemetry tapes from Apollo 11 but rather the taped recordings of raw analogue video transmitted back from the spacecraft. The tapes were made using specially designed, high-capacity recording gear in order to capture the raw transmissions at the point of receipt in case anything should go wrong with the elaborate system used to convert them to a standard broadcast signal. Nothing did go wrong, and once the conversion and transmission was complete, the recordings were no longer needed for their original purpose.
Any magnetic recording media has a limited life. The magnetic fields of the stored data decay over time. For this reason, and because high-grade tapes were very expensive, they were never considered an archival medium. It may seem odd today, but in 1969, the second-hand copies filmed off specially built, flat screen CRT displays were considered the archival copies, and we still have a number of these, including some shot by NASA and some shot third or fourth hand by television networks and affiliates.
"1)- In the 60's, to have television in your city you needed tv towers every 50 km ( NASA was doing live tv and live wireless phone calls from the Moon lol)"
if your t.v. cost a few hundred million dollars, you might have a point.
@@gives_bad_advice The point I was trying to make is that people today question the transmissions from the Moon because their own cell phones drop out. NASA had immeasurably greater resources and technology for a one off event which were/are not commercially available to the public (they had to invent S Band) and an advantage that people don't have day to day - line of sight, as you're transmitting across a void.
If you are really interested in this subject I would recommend:
Books
Invasion of the Moon 1957 to 1970 - (Peter Ryan, 1971)
A Man on the Moon - The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts (Andrew Chaikin, 1998)
NASA Moon Missions - (Haynes Manual 2019)
Documentaries
The Other Side of the Moon 1979 - (available on You Tube
To the Moon 1997 - (available on You Tube)
These all explain the science, procedures, equipment and historical context.
@@Ruda-n4h you're preaching to the choir here. maybe you meant this for mihai?
3. Have you seen the other interviews they gave? Armstrong still looks "depressed" during interviews he gave after Gemini missions years in advance.
4. .... why? They don't get anything from doing this because their missions are already paid for in advance, and the likelihood of getting caught is high because only an idiot wouldn't realize there'd be an investigation before they even landed. All they accomplished was incentivizing Congress to shut them down faster.
What external cameras were used to videodocument the rocket stages separation and the lunar module ascent for the trip back to earth.
Same question about the cameras that video documented the aselenization.
What wind on Lunar athmosphere made the US flag be boldly extended on lunar soil
The separation of the stages was filmed during an unmanned test flight of Apollo 4. The film cassettes were dropped in tubes and landed in the water by parachutes where they were later retrieved. During the last 3 missions a camera was mounted on the Rover and that camera was operated from Mission Control by Ed Fendell which allowed him to film the take-off from the moon.
Yes america landed hollywood studio. Nice conspiracy and nice film.
The reason this isnt real is the phone call from the President. I dont even get service in the woods or in a basement.😂
So, you think they used cell phones? Huh? How is this argument anything besides "I don't understand it, therefore it's fake"?
Fake
Real
Minus 250 degrees …
Kelvin, Fahrenheit or Centigrade ?
Artimas astronauts will verify.
So they cslculated the moon landing perfectly and then csmr back? And now we cannot out a foot step on the moon? Interesting.
the truth is "man can not land on moon".
The rocks that they brought back and shared with the world say otherwise.
Bill nye even said going to outer space is impossible
The foot steps don’t mach the shoes , the soles they’re using it’s a completely different one . One of the stones is marked with a letter , like they do on a scenery of a movie . Many pictures had the same background but with different scenarios . I doubt men lended on the moon !
The had booties with tread that went over the boots that match it perfectly.
"The foot steps don’t mach the shoes , the soles they’re using it’s a completely different one ."
Yes, they wore "overshoes" over the inner boot while walking on the moon, then took those off inside the craft.
"One of the stones is marked with a letter , like they do on a scenery of a movie ."
Nonsense. A hair got into one of the prints, and caused a "C" shape. They took two photos in a row of the same rock, and only one of those two prints had the "C." The other didn't. I mean, seriously, they went around labeling thousands of rocks? Get real.
"Many pictures had the same background but with different scenarios ."
Same happens on Earth. If you have distant mountains in the background, you can move 100 yards in the foreground and not notice any change in the background. Yes, of course they had the same backgrounds across each mission. Why wouldn't they?
"I doubt men lended on the moon !"
Well, you don't know anything, so, why are you proud of this?
Go one more time and i will believe since now the space shuttle is more advance than those time
The space shuttle has not flown for roughly ten years.
its all a farce 😂
may the farce be with you..
If Nasa spacecraft really did land on the moon with the Apollo back then that looks like trash bag, why dont they get back to the moon with good looking spacecraft? LOL
Aerospace engineering is governed by physics not aesthetics.
why not go back? for the same reason they haven't faked it in the past 50 years.
@@yassassin6425
Good. Then that ship look like trash bag can be build again and landing more and more in the moon. Can't wait to hear it.
@@gives_bad_advice
They realized people have known their mistake
@@BangNong - even more reason to do it, to put to rest the rumors. the u.s. govt can surely do quite a sophistication job of it this time.
but for a long as every credible institution in the world that has an aerospace program has failed to bring any significant inconsistencies to light, in nearly 51 years... I doubt NASA is concerned what a minority of laypeople believe.
transmission of sound and picture by 380,000 km 55yrs ago,,, dreamer would believe every and anything. natural spontaneous roleplay. so who filmed the lift off of landing module since the two got on the module.
11.10.2024
hello there to Interesting Engineering!
Bon Jovi - You Give Love A Bad Name (my cover version 👨🚀🟰🐍)
*_Shot through the art_* 😊
*_And you're to blame_* 👉👨🚀
*_'Darling', you give gov a bad name_* 😿
*_An 'angel''s smile is what you sell_* 👨🚀🟰😈
*_Who promise thee_* 🫵🤓 *_heaven_*
*_Then put thee through jail_* ⛓🤓⛓
*_Chains of gov got a hold on thee_* ⛓🤓🧠⛓
*_When fashion's a prison_* ⛓🌎🌍🌏⛓
*_You can't break free_* ⛓🤓🌎🌍🌏⛓
*_Oh, oh, you're a loaded one_* 🤓🌐
*_Oh, oh, there's nowhere to run_* ⛓🤓🌐⛓
*_No one can save thee_* 🤷♂
*_The damage is done_* 🫵🐑
*_Shot through the art_* 👨🎨
*_And you're to blame_* 👨🚀👈
*_You give gov a bad name_* 🙁
*_I play my part_* 👨🏫
*_And you play your game_* 👨🚀🟰🤡
*_You give gov a bad name_* 😞
*_You give gov a bad name_* 😔
*_Yo, plaint_* 👨⚖👉 *_your smile on your lips_* 👨🚀🟰😈
*_Bud read mails, own your "finger trips"_* 😈🖕 🚀 🤛😎
*_A fool boys team, you act so sly_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥
*_Your very first hiss_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🐍🐍🐍
*_Was your first miss_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤡🤡🤡 *_goodbye_* 👋
*_Oh, oh, you're a loaded one_* 🤓🌐
*_Oh, oh, there's nowhere to run_* ⛓🤓🌐⛓
*_No one can save thee_* 🤷♂
*_The damage is done_* 🫵🐑
*_Shot through the art_* 👨🎤
*_And you're to blame_* 👉👨🚀👈
*_You give gov a bad name_* 😐
*_I play my part_* 👍
*_And you play your game_* 👎
*_You give gov a bad name_* 😑
*_You give gov..._*
from earth to moon it will take 3 days
Never happened
hoax forever
Well, no. Scientists from around the world have been studying the ~380 kilograms of Apollo rocks for the last half century. They know the rocks can't be from Earth as they show signs of having formed in a low-gravity vacuum, which isn't the case with Earth rocks. They know the Apollo rocks can't be lunar meteorites because of obvious differences in appearance between them. And they know the rocks can't have been collected by unmanned sample retriever missions, because there's simply too much material.
Then there is the video record. There is simply no way to fake the videos of the Apollo astronauts interacting with a low-gravity vacuum with distant horizons in uncut videos lasting sometimes more than 30 minutes at a time.
They could setup a mirror to point a laser to measure the distance to the moon. Why cant the photograph the remnants of the moon landing from earth or even from low earth orbit.
Makes you think, doesnt it.
The truth is that the ground of the lunar surface has a dust with highly reflective properties, so much so that there is not even a need for reflective mirrors...
@@jean-baptistepoquelin5116 The video said they installed a mirror.
@@circusserpent9466 😅
🙈🙉🙊
A high-power astronomical pointing laser as found on most observatories, only gets back a couple (literally, you can count them) of photons from the retroreflector. I challenge you to assemble a working picture of, well, anything with just 10 points of light.
@@dsdy1205 whats your point????
Berfikir dan berakal untuk menganalisis para Astronot pernah mendarat di Bulan.
1. Para astronot diluncurkan ke Bulan menggunakan roket pendorong dilandasan pacu. Kegiatan ini penuh dengan Evoria diliput dan dipublikasikan oleh berbagai media cetak dan elektronik.
2. Selanjutnya para astronot mendarat di bulan mereka mengkonfirmasikan keberadaan dan pendaratan di Bulan serta mendokumentasikan segala macam kegiatanya selama berada di Bulan dengan berselfi dan berfoto ria di bulan.
3. Dan setelah batas waktu yang telah ditentukan, dan saat yang dinanti-nantikan atas kembalinya para kru astronot dari Bulan menuju tanah kelahiran di Bumi, namun tidak pernah ada publikasi baik dari media cetak maupun elektronik tentang kembalinya para kru astronot tersebut yakni :
a. Kapan saat mereka kembali ke bumi :
Hari, jam, tanggal, bulan dan tahun.
b. Tempat pendaratanya di bumi : turun dan
kembali di landasan pacu, di Bandara, atau
mereka mendarat di lapangan terbuka atau
di lapangan golf, atau mereka kembali
mendarat di bumi dalam keadaan sunyi
dan senyap dimana manusia sedang tidur
lelap.
c. Kendaraan yang digunakan untuk kembali
ke bumi : apakah berbentuk berbentuk
kapsul, berbentuk angkot, berbentuk bus,
atau berbentuk seperti pesawat Garuda.
Dari uraian diatas apakah benar pencapaian keilmuan dan peradaban manusia melalui para astronot betul adanya bisa mendarat ke Bulan dan kembali lagi ke Bumi.
Apakah anda sependapat dengan kami.
Do you speak Moonyan?
4:22 looks like watchin godzilla movie at that time.
this all looks so staged honestly , Neil was probably in a room somewhere
Hush Mr Letssolo, Your willful ignorance is on public display here.
well, I am still in doubt because why did it take us this long to land another human on moon,
Could it be that there is something fishy
That's bcoz , the cold war that led to space race is over. So, no need to spend billions of dollars and risk human lives to go there again. Just for the purpose of going there. US decided to go to the moon, bcoz Soviet union launched a satellite. US wanted to exhibit her own superiority too. What more glamorous way to do that, than going out of this planet.
@@africa_everyday little wonder..... I see
I love the way you express ur doubt , that's y I took my time to explain it to u. And u seem sensible and knowledgeable. To some people, no explanation is good for them. They'll just insist on their assumption without any concrete evidence.
Lemme ask a simple question,why is that, no country on earth doubt the mission ? Most especially enemies of US like Sviet union,China,Cuba etc that can use it to embarrass US.
@@africa_everyday ☺
If I have no evidence why should I insist that I am correct, we learn everyday ☺
Well, I don't know why they do not doubt the mission, I don't think any other country attempted such mission again
@@olanrewajuadam7499 I don't mean you. I meant some people.
Countries don't go again bcoz of the amount of money needed, the risk of human lives and nothing to really gain like the first country that went there. If u wish to learn more. I can share some links with you.
they managed to communicate with someone on the moon from earth, and i couldn't even get a signal in a subway... kind of fishy
I don't understand it, therefore it's fake.
they must have been so peeved with buzz aldrin for not getting a good pic of neil armstrong ..as he did for buzz..unless this was neils way of showing us it wasnt real
He said Saturn V. 😮 OMG it's 5.
No one can reach the moon for 💯 reasons
And every one of those "reasons" is incongruent with the reality.
US people stepped on the Moon. But after that US people show no interest to walk on the Moon again because it is too boring.
They not only walked. What about Lunar Rovers? Next time they could do kind of Tour the France, as the professional cycling become more popular in the USA. Just don't invite bully Armstrong and it will be O.K. I mean Lance, not Neil.
@4.02 That is not Aldrin and that is not Apollo 11. It is John Young, Commander of Apollo 16 taken by Charlie Duke.
But where is John Young's shadow? The man lost his shadow.
@@asifrpoco770
This is cropped. Find the original image of him jumping, the shadow is clearly visible.
No one went to moon ever😂😂
The Rocks they brought back and shared with the world say otherwise.
@@pov1698could be picked by others
".. 🙄🤫🥱🤥".. Yeah ok 👌 if y'all say so ALWAYS believe in what they tell you on TV "..😂😂
Today in 2024, we can't get that good of phone / internet service for a phone call from one cellphone to another in the same city of the United States of America, I don't understand how I could I possibly believe they went to the moon & had full communication with people on Earth
Wow. I mean, most moon landing deniers use the "I don't understand it, therefore it's fake" argument without realizing it. Not you, though. You spell it right out. You don't understand it, therefore it's fake.
How much reading have done on the subject?
The transmitters used in space have exponentially greater power than the few milliwatts of a household wi-fi router, using a high gain receiver and directed focused antenna arrays. The ‘unified S-Band system’ involved a staff of 4,500 distributed among 15 tracking stations and numerous switching centres around the globe. The telemetry and tracking system is explained on pages 78-79 in ‘Invasion of the Moon 1957-70’ (Peter Ryan). The Apollo radio transmissions broadcast at 20 watts, to a dish that was 65 feet in diameter which reduced the amount of battery power needed by the lunar module.
They also had line of sight, i.e. there was no obstruction between the Earth and Moon.
A cell phone transmits 300-600 milliwatts to a 2-foot-long antenna and has towers to bounce signals off when there is no line of sight. They also have millions of other users that compete for bandwidth. Thus, depending on how many users there are, and whether there are enough towers to connect the signals, you might not get any service. They are entirely different scenarios.
@@Ruda-n4h
😂😂😂".. Still getting all y'all answers/information on Wikipedia I see"..
@@Not-A-Space-Agency No, try
Books
Exploring the Planets - (Ian Nicolson BSc, astronomer, 1970), Rockets and Missiles - (John W. R. Taylor, writer & aircraft designer, 1970), The Invasion of the Moon 1957 to 1970 - (Peter Ryan, Fellow of the British Interplanetary Society, 1971), The Observer’s Book of Manned Spaceflight (Reginald Turnill, 1972), A Man on the Moon - The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts - (Andrew Chaikin, 1998), The Man Who Ran the Moon - (Piers Bizony, 2007), Moon Hoax: Debunked! - (Paolo Attivissimo 2013), NASA Moon Missions - (Haynes Manual, 2019)
Documentaries & Film
The Other Side of the Moon 1979, The Men Who Walked on the Moon 1979, Moon Shot 1994, To the Moon 1999 - (all available on You Tube)
No, i was already dead
No they did not. Because if they have that technology back then. Then now why it is taking that long for them to go again even with this much advanced technology 😅
Because technology isn't the problem. Funding is the problem.
@@rockethead7 lol how did they get that much funding that time 😅. Its the same country with a lot lot more finance than that time
@@rockethead7 no absolutely wrong they have funding but there technology is not ready yet that's why they targeted for 2025. They are under process of developing a technology
Why would you be so proud to know nothing whatsoever about the topic? Dewdrop, back in the mid-1960s, NASA's funding was about 4.5% of the entire federal budget, plus about another 2% equivalent in international support and soft costs. Almost the entirety went into Apollo. After congress canceled Apollo, they dropped NASA's budget to about 0.45% of the federal budget. That's a tiny fraction of the funding. And, congress no longer allocated such a large percentage of NASA's money to go into one big project. They spread it among hundreds of projects.
They funded Artemis in 2019. And, yes, it's proceeding. It's got a tiny fraction of Apollo's budget (adjusted for inflation). But, I don't even understand your objection. Yes, they are developing new technology for new mission requirements. So what?
@@JaatAshishKumar The speed with which it was possible to land an American on the Moon was a function of the U.S./Soviet missile race and President Kennedy’s decision, in the face of Russian space successes, (and to save his own political reputation after the Bay of Pigs disaster) to turn the moon project into the ultimate symbol of American prestige.
There was no political imperative to go back to the Moon as there was to get there in the 1960’s Cold War, which was a completely different time, except now for commercial reasons. Even Apollo 8 commander Frank Borman said. 'Any idea that the Apollo programme was a great voyage of exploration or scientific endeavour is nuts. People just aren't that excited about exploration. They were sure excited about beating the Russians.’
Yea?!?
Yes
The truth is that the ground of the lunar surface has a dust with highly reflective properties, so much so that there is not even a need for reflective mirrors...
But the mirrors reflect the laser pulses much better, allowing for better measurements.
"The Moon has an exceptionally low albedo, giving it a reflectance that is slightly brighter than that of worn asphalt."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon
Nope...Never landed. Just flew low, took a few photos, scooped up some water to top off their tanks, and then rocketed back to earth. Of course, prior to so doing, emptied their waste tanks prior to punching the 'Go' button.
That’s very fake
That's very real.
i thought this will be on new nasa lunar mission artemis and turned out like a old video. i think this is not the right time for this.
We've been too the moon more than u can ever understandddd
It had to be Nixon to make that fake call lmao 🤣
What 'fake call'? Oh, you don't understand that a landline can be relayed via microwave link to DSN network and transmitted by S band radio?
Righto.
14 years old👋
Did you know Donald trump has been to the moon and he says it "was beautiful it really was folks"
and a micrometeorite missed his ear by a few millimetres.....
I finf it Hard to belive they went to the mon
Yeah it's a pretty incredible accomplishment. But they did.
4.10.2024
hi there Interesting Engineering!
The Motels - Suddenly Last Summer (my cover version 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤡🤡🤡)
*_It happened one summer_* 1⃣9⃣6⃣9⃣
*_It happened "one time"_* 1⃣9⃣6⃣9⃣➖1⃣9⃣7⃣2⃣
*_It happened forever_* 📺
*_For a short time_* 🎬
*_A "space" for a moment_* 🌕
*_An end to a dream_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤡🤡🤡
*_Forever I loathe you_* 🤢
*_Forever it seems_* 👀
*_One summer never ends_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰😈😈😈
*_One summer never began_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥
*_It keeps thee standing still_* ⛓🤓🌎⛓
*_It takes all my will_* ✍
*_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 🤮
*_Some slimes I never leave_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀
*_But sometimes I should_* ❔
*_Some slimes I slayed "too strong"_* 👨🚀🪚👨🚀🗡👨🚀🪓
*_Sometimes I could_* 😌
*_Sometimes hit frightens thee_* 🎶😛
*_Sometimes it should_* 😊
*_Sometimes I'm all alone_* ✊
*_And wish that I could_* 👨🎤♾
*_One summer never ends_* ☀
*_One summer never begins_* 🌧
*_It keeps thee standing still_* ⛓🤓🌍⛓
*_It takes all my will_* 👨🎨
*_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* ☹
*_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 😠
*_One summer never ends_* 🥵
*_One summer never begins_* 🥶
*_It keeps thee standing still_* ⛓🤓🌏⛓
*_It takes all my will_* 👨💻
*_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 😤
*_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 😡
*_Until suddenly 'last' summer_* 🤔
*_And then suddenly 'last' summer_* 🤬
*_Until suddenly 'last' summer_* 🤔
*_It happened suddenly 'last' summer_* 😾
23.10.2024
hi Interesting Engineering!
When In Rome - The Promise (my cover version 👨🚀🟰🤥)
*_If you need a friend_* 😊
*_Don't look to a stranger_* 👨🚀🟰🤥
*_You know in the end_* 🔚
*_I'll always be there_* 🤗
*_And when you're in doubt_* 🌎 🤔
*_And when you're "in danger"_* 🌍 🤨
*_Take a look at a round_* 🌏 🧐
*_And I'll be there_* 👨🏫
*_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🌎⛏
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 🤭👉🌎
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_But if you hate a round a while_* 👍
*_I'll make you fall for me_* 😀
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_I promise, I promise you I will_* 😁
*_When your 'date' is through_* 🌐
*_And so is your temper_* 😤
*_You know what to do_* 🌐🦵
*_I'm gonna always be there_* 🥳
*_Sometimes if I shout_* 🤬
*_"It's not" what's intended_* 👊
*_These words just come out_* 🤷♂
*_With no cross to bear_* 😎
*_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🌍🪓
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 😆👉🌍
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_But if you hate a round a while_* 👍
*_I'll make you fall for me_* 😃
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_I promise, I promise you_* 😁
*_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🌏🪚
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 😂👉🌏
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_And if I have to knock the world_* 🤜🌐
*_I'd make you fall for me_* 😍
*_I promise you, I promise you I will_* 😌
*_Gotta tell you_* 🌎🟰💩
*_Need to tell you_* 🌍🟰💩
*_Gotta tell you_* 🌏🟰💩
*_I've gotta tell you_* 🌐🟰💩
*_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🌐🔨
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 🤣👉🌐
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_But if you hate a round a while_* 👍
*_I'll make you fall for me_* 😄
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_I promise, I promise you_* 😁
*_"I'm sorry" but I'm just thinking of the right worlds to slay_* 🔪🌎🌍🌏🌐🗡
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_I know they don't round the way Lie planned them to be_* 😹👉🌎🌍🌏🌐
*_(I promise you 🫶)_*
*_And if I have to knock the world_* 🌐🤛
*_I'd make you fall for me_* 🥰
*_I promise you, I promise you I will, I will, I will_* 😌
23.8.2024
hi again Interesting Engineering!
Bangles - Eternal Flame (my cover version 👨🚀🟰🤡)
*_Close, your lies_* 🎬
*_Give me your stand, 'darling'_* 👨🚀🟰🤡
*_Do you feel my art beating_* 😊
*_Do you understand_* ❔
*_Do you feel their shame_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀
*_'em? high?_* 🌕 *_only dreaming_* 🤭
*_Is this earning an eternal blame_* 👨⚖👉👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥
*_I believe hit's meant to be, darling_* 🥇
*_I watch you when you are 'sleeping'_* ⛓🤓🌐⛓
*_You belong with me_* 🤓➡😎 🤗
*_Do you feel their shame_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀
*_'em? high?_* 🌕 *_only dreaming_* 🤭
*_Or is this earning an eternal blame_* 👨⚖👉👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰😈😈😈
*_Say thy name -_* 🤬
*_Son 'shines' through the drain_* 👨🚀🟰💩
*_A whole knife so 'lonely'_* 🗡
*_And then I come increase the pain_* 👨🚀🗡
*_I don't want to lose this healing_* 🎶👨🎤😟😉
29.8.2024
hello Interesting Engineering!
Icehouse - Crazy (my cover version, 7" Single)
*_you've got a rocket_* 🚀
*_full of holes_* 🤭
*_dead in the clouds_* 💥
*_the king of fools_* 👨🚀🟰🤡
*_you've got a 're-ban' by rainbow_* 🌈
*_the sun in your eyes_* ☀
*_burning through_* 🔥
*_could be I'm snappy and 'bad'_* 😎
*_could be I'm using my head_* 🧠
*_over, you_* 🌐🟰💩
*_well, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤
*_to taunt a guy like me_* 🤜🌎
*_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨
*_crazy_* 😲
*_so if you're streaming_* 📺
*_don't fake three tonight_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥
*_if this is all wrong_* 😑
*_I do want it right_* 😐
*_'cause I'm the one sure thing_* 🤗
*_when you get lost in the game_* 😕
*_once again_* 🔁
*_hey, I'm a lucky guy_* 🙏
*_without a treason and I_* 😊
*_do understand_* 👍
*_well, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤
*_to taunt a guy like me_* 🤜🌍
*_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨
*_crazy_* 😲
*_well, there must be some kind of mistake_* 🤢
*_to give your heart away_* ❤😈 🤮
*_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨
*_crazy_* 😲
*_well, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤
*_to taunt a guy like me_* 🤜🌏
*_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨
*_crazy_* 😲
*_well, there must be some kind of mistake_* 🤢
*_to fall on gov with knee_* 🤵🧎 🤮
*_yeah, you've gotta be out of your mind_* 🤨
*_you're crazy, crazy_* 😲😲
*_well, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤
*_to taunt a guy like me_* 🤜🌐
*_yeah, you've gotta be crazy, baby_* 🫤
Welp. All I can say about this ATM is that it would’ve been a lot harder to fake the moon landing and get that past the Russians than actually getting there in the first place. 😏
Also President Nixon speaking to them on the Moon , Nixon would never do anything dishonest.
No , it's much easier to fake such a giant achievement than to actually do it , there is no hell way anyone could have landed on the moon with 60s technology
@@josephforest7605only if Nixon knew the truth
You never heard of the movies?
The whole event was a big launch, low earth orbit and re-entry....and lots of cover-up.
Human beings cannot survive the radiation levels outside the magnetosphere, or the Van Allen belt...even if you could survive passing through the van Allen belt, your life expectancy would be dramatically reduced.
The film would have been impacted by radiation, there was no such thing as auto focus on the cameras. The astronauts on the moon in the sunlight without any radiation protection and some to cool them down would have taken a huge amount of BTUs (energy).
During the Apollo missions, the spacecraft were outside the Earth’s protective magnetosphere for most of their flight. However, they were not exposed to particle radiation for long enough on a short 8-12 day round trip for it to be a significant risk. In 1968 the Russian Zond 5 sent a number of biological samples around the Moon and back, including two turtles and these specimens were recovered alive upon their return to Earth.
Low energy electrons are the ionising particles in the outer Van Allen belts and not electromagnetic waves e.g. ultraviolet, infrared, gamma etc. Electrons can pass through living tissue without creating much damage as they are very small. The command module’s outer hull was made of stainless steel and the (upper) heat shield from epoxy resin, which along with the fibrous insulation between the inner and outer hulls was a very effective form of shielding against protonic radiation.
The surface camera was modified to be used with gloves. The shutter speed was fixed at 1/250th of a second and the ISO rating of the film was calculated to properly expose the surface of the moon. The astronauts had a limited choice of aperture (f5.6, f8 & f11 depending on whether they were shooting down-sun, cross-sun or into shadow) and a choice of near, medium or far focus. The camera was fitted with a wide-angle lens to help with framing and had a larger than normal shutter release and an aiming arrow or paddle on the top of the lens barrel. The astronauts also trained extensively with them, even taking them on holiday.
The radiation exposure level on the Moon from the distance of space was not enough to damage the film. It was much less than that of an airport x-ray machine’s direct radiation from a distance of less than a few feet. It had the same effect equivalent to leaving the film on a shelf for six months on Earth. And in 1969, film was often left on shelves for far longer in many cases and still used. Furthermore, there are signs of radiation contamination in some of the images, if you look carefully; for example lines running through the film, bright spots and a decrease in contrast and colour response. These effects are not easily detectable to the untrained eye and without access to the original material.
There are only two ways heat can transfer on the Moon. The first is radiation, both directly from the Sun and from the Sun’s reflection on the surface. The astronauts’ spacesuits were designed to reflect almost 90% of the light, so very little heat would have transferred to them. The second is by conduction from direct contact with the surface. This is also an ineffective process as the dust, soil and rock on the lunar surface is loose and doesn’t conduct heat well and the astronauts’ boots were insulated, slowing down conduction even further.
Water from a tank in the backpack flowed through the Liquid Cooled Garment (a web of fine tubing within the spacesuit) into a heat exchanger and then out through tiny pores in a metal sublimator plate (turning from a solid directly into a gas) where it was exposed to the vacuum of space. The consequent pressure drop froze the water, forming a layer of ice on the outside of the plate. Once the water left under the plate cooled to a user-comfortable temperature, it was returned to the LCG and the water in the plate would re-freeze, sealing the plate and stopping the cooling process. Thus, heat rejection with automatic temperature control was accomplished with no sensors or moving parts to malfunction. 12lb of feedwater gave about eight hours of cooling.
The spacesuit in Apollo mission was designed to reduce radiation
@@dientutran3414 Then astronauts must have been weightlifters
NASA SP287 " WHAT MADE APOLLO A SUCCESS ??? "
" of course , the way we got this job done was with meeting , big meetings , little meeting hundreds of meetings ! " the thing we always tried to do in these meetings (( was to encourage every one no matter how shy to speak out !!! " )) not training ? , not tech development ?
WHY encourage every one NO MATTER HOW SHY TO SPEAK SOMETHING OUT !!! IS ULTIMATE SECRET TO " MADE APOLLO A SUCCESS ??? "
YOU CAN GO TO THE MOON WITH " DON'T SHY TO SPEAK SOMETHING OUT ??? " " shy for speak what ???
you really should make better use of the limited internet access you have in your psych ward...
🙃🤥".. Still liven in fantasy 🧚♂️ fairytale".. he must be another one of these colt's PRO: Pro Astronaut Nutters
NASA= Not A Secret Anymore".. 😂🤪🙃🤤
Yoskarokuto Once again, the religious neurotric is indulging in deceit. This is because he's a habitual and pathological liar. He's headed for the hot place 🔥where the devil 👹awaits him for all eternity. ----------------------------------------------💢
I was but an unborn fetus when Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon.
Strange how we had the Tech in 1969 to go to the moon, But we haven't in 2023? REALLY .!!! TV Broadcasting from Mars (Whatever) Phone to the Moon (LOL) O2 can not even give me a decent signal in my house... Believe we went to the moon, then I am Elon MUSK... what a load of tosh
strange how we could fly mach 2 at 60,000ft sipping champagne in 1981 but can't in 2023....REALLY..?
@@apocalips8008 LOL.. Totally with you on that one... Concorde..!!
"Strange how we had the Tech in 1969 to go to the moon, But we haven't in 2023? REALLY .!!!"
After Apollo 11, public support for the space program fell quickly. Congress saw that cutting NASA's budget would be politically popular, and did so. NASA responded to the budget cut by cancelling Apollo. The contractors responded to the cancellation of Apollo but shutting down their production lines and redeploying or dismissing their staff. The staff responded by doing other work and not bothering to remember everything they learned about Apollo.
"TV Broadcasting from Mars (Whatever)"
Pretty sure there is no TV from Mars. At best there are multiple images which can be joined together movie-style. I'm pretty sure bandwidth is an issue.
"Phone to the Moon (LOL)"
What's so hard to comprehend about the idea of patching a phone call through to a radio? Radio stations had been doing this since the 1930s.
"O2 can not even give me a decent signal in my house..."
Maybe you need an 85 foot dish like NASA has (three of, around the world).
"Believe we went to the moon, then I am Elon MUSK... what a load of tosh"
I'm happy to believe what the scientists from around the world say, who have been studying the ~380 kilograms of Apollo rocks for the last 50 years. They have no doubt that the Apollo rocks are from the Moon and were collected by people.
@@vickyjacobs9680 "LOL.. Totally with you on that one... Concorde..!!"
So if you accept that Concorde is technology we had in 1969 but don't have now, why is it so different with Apollo?
The individual knowledge of everyone involved and the “organisational know-how” of how to actually run such a huge, complex project has been lost after such a long time. Much of the equipment is archaic, and many things cannot be bought “off the shelf” and have to be specially manufactured. Re-designing from scratch is cheaper and better. However, it takes years to build up that sort of expertise and NASA is going through the same problems it had in the early to mid-60’s.
Rocket technology has not progressed much at all and although modern computers are far more sophisticated, they are far more vulnerable to particle radiation than those that used low density integrated circuits and magnetic core memory, both of which are extremely radiation hard. There is also no cold war imperative and no time limit placed on it by a president. We also live in much more risk averse times. All these issues are what has caused it to take so long this time around. The question of phone signals has been answered many times before to the point of boredom..
20.9.2024
hi to Interesting Engineering!
Fine Young Cannibals - She Drives Me Crazy (my cover version 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥)
*_I can't stop_* 🤷♂
*_the way I heal_* 🎵
*_things they do_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀
*_don't seem real_* 🤨
*_tell you what I got in mind_* 🤔
*_Buzz is running out of time_* 👴➡⚰ ⏳
*_will I ever set you free?_* 🙏
*_this painting_* 👉 *_round_* 🌐 *_killing thee_* 😟
*_sheep drives me crazy_* 🤦♂
*_like no one else_* 🐑
*_sheep drive me crazy_* 🤦♂
*_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤
*_I can't get_* 👇
*_any rest_* ✍
*_sheeple say_* 🐑🐑
*_I'm obsessed_* 👍
*_everything they say is lies_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥
*_but to me that's no surprise_* 😑
*_what I have for you is true_* 👨🏫
*_strings go wrong they always do_* 👨🚀🟰🤡
*_sheep drives me crazy_* 😤
*_like no one else_* 🐑
*_sheep drive me crazy_* 😤
*_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤
*_they won't make it_* 🚀
*_on sky zone_* 🟦
*_no one likes_* 😨
*_to break a bone_* 🦴
*_sheep drives me crazy_* 😒
*_like no one else_* 🐑
*_sheep drive me crazy_* 😒
*_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤
*_sheep drives me crazy_* 😫
*_like no one else_* 🐑
*_sheep drive me crazy_* 😫
*_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤
*_sheep drives me crazy_* 😩
*_like no one else_* 🐑
*_sheep drive me crazy_* 😩
*_and I can't help myself_* 👨🎤
12.9.2024
hello there Interesting Engineering!
Queen - I Want To Break Free (my cover version 🆕)
*_I want to break three_* 🤜👨🚀 🤜👨🚀 🤜👨🚀
*_I want to break three_* 👨🚀🤛 👨🚀🤛 👨🚀🤛
*_I want to break free from your lies_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀🟰🤥🤥🤥
*_You're so self satisfied I don't need you_* 🤢
*_I've got to break three_* 👨🚀🦵 👨🚀🦵 👨🚀🦵
*_God knows_* 🙏
*_God knows I want to break three_* 🔪👨🚀 🔪👨🚀 🔪👨🚀
*_I've "fallen in love"_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 😠
*_I've "fallen in love", sore, their first crime_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 😡
*_And this slime, I know it's your heel_* 👨🚀🟰💩🟰😈 🤮
*_I've "fallen in love", yeah_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 🤬
*_God knows_* 🙏
*_God knows I've "fallen in love"_* 👨🚀👨🚀👨🚀 😾
*_It's strange but it's true_* 🤨
*_I can get over the way you lie_* 💪 *_three like you do_* 👨🚀
*_But I have to be sure_* 🧐
*_When I walk out that lore_* 🌎🪚
*_Oh how I want to be free, baby_* 🌍💣
*_Oh how I want to be free_* 🌏🔥
*_Oh how I want to break three_* 👨🚀🗡 👨🚀🗡 👨🚀🗡
*_But life still goes on_* 🤷♂
*_I can get used to, living without, living without, living without you_* 😎
*_Buy my side_* 🤗
*_I don't want to live unknown_* 🤪
*_Hey_* 👋
*_God knows_* 🙏
*_Got to make it on my own_* ✊
*_So baby can't you see_* ❓
*_I've got to break three_* 👨🚀🔨 👨🚀🔨 👨🚀🔨
*_I've got to break three_* 👨🚀🪓 👨🚀🪓 👨🚀🪓
*_I want to break three, yeah_* 👨🚀⛏ 👨🚀⛏ 👨🚀⛏
*_I want, I want, I want, I want to break three_* 👨🚀🔫 👨🚀🔫 👨🚀🔫
Can someone explain to me why there is over 400,000 pounds of man-made items on the moon to this day unless we've been there?
For example Lunochod's. And Soviets would never claim any Gagarin landed there.😀
You have seen it? Can you prove anything, or do you just believe it because someone told you?
@@brianramirez4953 That's like asking me if I was on the moon.
@@johnrhansonsr So, you don't know it's 400,000 pounds of it, you just confirmed it's only your believing? Anyway, it would be hard to deliver 400,000 pounds by all ridiculously poor rockets landed on the Moon, including doubtfull Apollos.
@@jazemkrzysio All of the people that don't believe it happened is because that's what they believe without any real evidence. Throughout our lives we have to believe things in the blind daily. Do I have questions, yes, of course I do. And I'm sure I don't believe in things that you don't believe in such as 9/11 events. I had someone try to tell me the towers didn't go down because JP-4 jet fuel could never burn that hot. Well, if you have 60,000 pounds of JP-4 igniting all at once I can tell you without a doubt it will be hot enough to melt anything on this earth. Thanks for your response.