Apollo 14 in 24fps: Landing, Moonwalk & Liftoff
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 апр 2020
- Support content like this and more at my Patreon: / dutchsteammachine
Join the Discord Server and chat with like-minded people: / discord
Contact: apollo16uvc@gmail.com
Apollo 14 16mm taken during moon landing, EVA, Moonwalk and liftoff, interpolated from 12 to 24fps for your viewing experience. Synchronized with NASA & BBC audio.
16mm raw film: NASA
Audio: AFJ, Austin1987VCR, lunarmodule5
Processing: Dutchsteammachine 
Наука
Talk about the arc of a lifetime. Ed Mitchell was once a working cowboy in New Mexico back in the 1940's. Picturing him sitting around a campfire with some older cowboys who rode back when it was still the Wild West. None of them could have imagined that the young buck in their midst would one day, just some 30 odd years later, be walking on moon that shone above them.
how crazy is that?
Thanks for reminding how time can change life for good.
💯
He would have been about 15.
@@aemrt5745 My grandmother was born in 1888. She used to say that the hilight of her life was the invention of the movies and Charlie Chaplin in particular. The low point was losing two of her four brothers in WW1. She acknowledged the technical advances that you mention but they were generally too far removed from her everyday life to be very relevant.
Imagine being one of these guys and looking back at the earth and saying “wow I’m on the damn moon.”
"You seen one Earth, you seen 'em all!" -- Jack Schmitt, Apollo 17
@@EriPages Lunar landings were replicated five more times; and the first attempt was very nearly a failure. Also, there were four manned test missions prior to the Apollo 11 landing and many more unmanned ones. You have no idea what you're talking about.
@@EriPages indeed this happened in 1971
@@EriPages I don't even wanna waste my time trying to explain you some basic science... plus I will never never never believe you or whoever's gonna tell the moon landings are fake, you can tell whatever you want, I know the truth, you don't
@@EriPages You're talking in riddles. There's no such word as"REALER". Go away and educate yourself.
We only have ever seen these events in non-HD video and audio, but imagine actually being there, looking through human eyes, with real color.
@Juicewrld999 Of course it is - there is no atmosphere and thus no wind up there to make it flutter.
There is a horizontal rod attached to the flag pole to make the flag look good instead of just hanging downwards, but the flag is only moving when the astronauts are putting it up or when they touch it, as they move closely by it - and for some time afterwards, since there is no atmosphere there to dampen its oscillations, only inner friction in the pole + rod + flag system.
@Juicewrld999 Actually it wasn't - and it was probably blown over during take off by the high velocity exhaust gasses from the ascent module in the A11 case.
No it wasn't just 5 ft away, but more like 15 - 20 or so.
Anyway the two astronauts had a bit of trouble putting the flag pole up, because it turned out that the lunar soil was pretty hard beneath the thick layer of lunar dust, which of course didn't help either.
So on (some of?) the later Apollo missions they would instead put up the flagpole a good bit further away from the LM, and secure the flag pole much better by drilling a hole for it in the hard lunar soil.
And these later flag poles with the US flag flying from them still seem to be standing after all these years ( you can see their shadows ), when you look at the "close up" photos ( from a height of 20 - 25 km ) that were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LOR) that were taken of all 6 Apollo landing sites, when NASA shortly sent the LOR into a more elliptical orbit that allowed it to pass directly over them at relatively low altitudes.
@Bjowolf2 don't waste your brain on these retards. They have no life or purpose. They have to keep themselves busy by questioning the evidence of man's accomplishments and facts. Just ignore them.
@@JamieCrew Yes, you are right, but it's easy to get caught up in their web of ignorance and their lack of curiousity and ability to think for themselves 😉
Thank you 😊
@Juicewrld999 The lander is 31 feet wide (leg to leg). To be 5 feet away from the engine you'd have to be under it.
I cant wait for more lunar landing missions. Being able to see this is HD video will be incredible. The fact that this was done so many years ago with such little computational power is incredible. Much more focus on furthering the human race on a grand scale instead of worrying about cutting budgets
Maybe Artemis in 2025...
Now it will be much more of a cake walk. Since our last visits to the big space rock, we've sent probes and impacters to verious hard to reach places of the solar system. only issue is getting a safe enough system and suit to do the job with a larger margin of safety this time. We only have our own corperations to beat now.
Speaking of budgets, Arthur C Clark once said that everything you saw in the movie 2001 A Space Odessy could have been developed for the cost of the vietnam war
China is trying to land humans on the moon by 2030 and on mars by 2033 is what I've been hearing. There's still a race with foreign powers.@@dollin9515
we will never go back, shits fake asf
Not sure if I’d be filled more with absolute terror or wonder. Being on the moon, *Being* on the moon.
Wonder.
Even if you died there, you're doing something that only a handful of people have done.
Even if you die, you're dying in the midst badass way.
@@-Subtle- That’s totally true up until a point. Every diver that died diving was a hero until diving became common place. Every aviator that died flying made headlines until flying became common. The fear of being forgotten far outweighs the simple fear of death
@@MyLinguine No one remains remembered for eternity, but what matters is how are you different from the society.
hoax
@@mandrill173 Idiot.
And some kid reacting on another kid unboxing a happymeal gets millions of viewers. The moon seems a better place to be sometimes.
If that makes people happy, who are we to judge. Rather, we should be happy that there is also content for us out there.
the moon aint the kind kind of place to raise your kids. in fact its cold as hell, and then hot as hell, or something.
@@furadice973 Stand in the middle like a rotisserie chicken
@@furadice973 the song was about Mars, not the moon.
@@Nick-wn1xw Little boy blue and the man on mars.
Stanley Kubrick was hired by NASA to film the moon landing, Kubrick was so focused on getting the shots absolutely perfect he ended up filming on-location.
you had me at first lmao well done
This comment is made hundreds of times on every single moon video. Plagiarism at its finest
@@KnoxxJerz exactly
As one who lived through this period, I don’t find it funny at all…despite Kubrick being one of my favorite film makers.
This is why there were reports of massive episodes of depression from these astronauts for years after this mission. The high they must’ve experienced from
this mission, to experience that and then to come back to earth, never to leave again.
Or maybe they were forced to tell a lie
@@philippfinalizer
Reaching like all moon landing deniers
@@philippfinalizerhow dumb do you have to be…
@@GIJames I'm not convinced either way
The depression was living a lie the rest of their life with a gun pointed at them 24/7. Just look at the interview of buzz and niel afterwards.
It's amazing to think how much thrust it takes to escape the Earth, and how little it takes to escape the Moon.
That's gravity for you.
Keep in mind that the total mass of the Apollo at Canaveral liftoff was 6,200,000 pounds, while the lunar ascender weighed less than 11,000 pounds. That was the biggest difference.
Cgi studio shit 😂😂😂
@@rukawacloudstrife2114 Flat head bastard 💀
@@rukawacloudstrife2114 U dumb for real, man, CGI was primitive as hell up until the 80's when the industry finally started to hammer in and use it for entertainment and research
" A little fast, not too bad..." Only landing on the moon. No big deal. They sure picked the right guys for the job.
Thinks it’s coined at NASA “the right stuff”. Brilliant.
7min though out🤔 tHE LINES THAT R HOLDN da ASStronauts UP🤪 VERY VISUAL 9:27🤬.... FAKEM👀N LANDn4$ho
@@edellis2960 Mwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
@@edellis2960 you're stupid af
@@edellis2960 ya seriously you're a piece of shit, it would've been harder to fake the moon landing in 1969 than to just do it, and the astronauts left retroreflectors on the moon that are visible by telescope
This is remarkable. Those landings were maybe the biggest human accomplishment in history. I love this stuff.
😂😂😂
fake af
So fake. As an engineer, the tech they had in the 60s wasnt anywhere close to landing on the moom and Taking back off, without any errors, on the first try...
@@toaster3822 I'll also point out that the earth is flat, which falsifies the moon landing on its own.
@@toaster3822 the first try? Are you aware of how many Apollo missions there were? Also, the Russians were watching this from both the inside and outside. If it was a fake, why didn’t they say anything? They would’ve known. There was a huge issue of prestige at play and they acknowledged the achievement.
The comments on this are too overwhelming positive...who's scrubbing this thing?
lucky you if just scrubbing it gets you positive comments...
I left a non positive comment on a similar M landing post and the next time I tried to post one I was banned , they are very sharp at keeping it positive
@@Alanoffer and keeping out the ignorant
9:27 : me running back to check if I look stupid in the photo
Underrated comment
this is so good dud
LOL 😂
Lmfao
I hate when people tell me to smile right before a photo - that just feels _unnatural._ I prefer when they take spontaneous photos of random cheerful moments instead.
I can't wait to see the Artemis 3 recorded images in HD when they will be back from the Moon on Earth with the future selected astronauts. It's gonna be life changing
yea!
Yet still the fake moon landing morons will be out in force.
9:56
😂
We can’t and have never went to space, this is fraudulent
You know what the most amazing thing about this video is? On the liftoff the propulsion from the rocket blows pieces of the ships insulation off and takes out the American flag but amazingly the footprints in the moondust just beneath the ship are totally undisturbed. That truly is miraculous!
Weak sauce. You're just making excuses.
Ok, how does an ascent engine with 3,500 pounds of thrust lift off from the "moon" and not disturb the surface directly underneath it?@@Tim22222
@@chriscurtis1578the ascent module fires the engine onto the decent module and not the ground. That’s why the ground isn’t too disturbed from exhaust but things like the flag are. The dust and regolith does get thrown around a bit but it’s only for a few seconds and the ascent module doesn’t have that much power when compared to the main engines of other rockets. You can use weaker engines here because of the weaker gravity, which is why the engine of the lunar ascent module can lift it even thought on earth, it cant.
The photos in this video can all be viewed in the NASA archives. Are the real? That's the billion-dollar question. Good luck
ruclips.net/video/Ev8RKZcCJHs/видео.html
@@archierush868archie, you're a moon-landing fanboy! If only it really happened, that would be fantastic, but unfortunately it didn't.
Imagine being there in person… gosh what a feeling… would be hard to grasp.
I can’t believe they’re not giggling and cheering the whole Time
I wouldn’t be professional enough for this at all
YES IMAGINE, BUT IT WAS A HOAX
@@tedcruzforgayrights2045
Why would you need to be professional? Professional for what?
You’d assume these people would show more emotion, it’s weird.
@@TripsX it’s most likely because they’re on a very strict time limit, they have a list of goals to take care of and in brand new territory like this you’d want to stay focused to the mission
Anything could happen
Also this is just a snippet
They spent a whole 21 hours on the moon, which I didn’t know until making this comment, so they probably had their moment at some point
That's the wonderful thing about having recorded events like this with film instead of the primitive video technology of the time. You can digitize it in HD as see it as never before.
@@VolkerThimm the 10fps progressive scan valve based video cameras used for live broadcast.
@@jon_collins Not "valve" or vacuum tube based, except for the Epicon tube , which was a cross between a CRT and a silicon diode image matrix
There is tv footage from Apollo 17 EVA, many hours actually, that doesn't look too bad. Most people only seen the horrible (quality) one from Apollo 11.
ruclips.net/video/vBSzlMjpBuM/видео.html for example.
I heard that 11's EVA tv was filmed of a monitor in the tracking station and then send to the US for tv. It certainly looks like that in original recordings.
Funny how only the technology for the moon was better in 1969 than it is in 2021.
@Andre I know, its a joke, just like everything the government is telling us. They lied saying meat and butter and eggs were bad, now were finding out they're opposite.
amazing. thanks for sharing. my words fail to describe the wonder of the cosmos unless i sit for a while and think
@yony artworks what does this mean? I think it's polish... jinkuyye (thank you) lol
Greta Thunberg - How dare you!
@Greta Thunberg Yes, and Earth is flat, and it was created six thousand years ago by the one and only sky lord.
@Greta Thunberg Ahh yes, the be all and end all of solid evidence. A fucking RUclips video, made for numpties like you to lap up because you're too desperately thick to be able to tell.
@Greta Thunberg I just went to the video in your link and "thumbs downed". I suggest everyone else do the same.
Great Sci-Fi! Amazing. I am really impressed by how well they faked the Moon landings.
ha ha
I think this is one of the most amazing pieces of footage I've ever seen
I love how you can hear the long delay between the on-site communication and the echo of them receiving it.
Let's see the hoaxtards try and explain that.
Michael Clentworth i mean if I was a director making a movie about people going on the moon but shot in a studio, I would take in consideration the communication delay
@@fantin298 ya, these pseudo science moon landing must be stopped lol. they're even making fun of smart anti moon landing ew
OH NO! MY FOOT TRANSFORMED INTO A FOOT, WITH YOUR ASS WRAPED AROUND IT!
Rly, go back 2 4chan
Actually, I have longer delays than this using my cell phone calling my friends in The Rockies in 2021. ;-)
Lifting off the moon is the coolest part. The fraction of the effort to escape the moons gravity well is so small.
J Calhoun education for those morons is like red cape to a bull
@J Calhoun 🤣 enjoy
@@nikola.trafojer if you claim to know anything about physics... why are you mixing up mass and weight? Pssshhhhh....
@@nikola.trafojer Tbh thats not really the odd part. Jumping your vehicle into the 'air' and then activating thrust to escape the gravity isnt all that hard to do, hell you could do the same with fireworks on Earth, just throw it in the air right before lift off.
Moon escape velocity is 2.4 km/s. not sure that required effort is small.
Thank you for upscaling it with AI, makes watching actually interesting.
Holy hell it's crazy how many people don't believe it. It's even funnier how some of them complain that the video quality is "too high to be true" xd. Do they even read what are they about to watch?
Easiest argument against the non-believers I've ever seen comes from Buzz Aldrin: "If you can disprove the math, you can disprove the landing"
@@dakunism how the f is simulated math any proof for u are u actually retarded or what??
Why hasn't this video been shown before?
they looked so happy to be there! little happy hops
I love watching footage from the apollo days. truly incredible
Fake. Because NASA lied.
USA lied .
They all lied .......they never went !
@@Motleymick lying works only for things that cannot be objectively proven, like God, or Santa Claus. Apollo can be proven thus, so lying won't work. Sorry.
@@thewildcellist Just because they made the Apollo does not prove it landed on the moon then flew back to earth. 230,000 miles each way on a single tank of fuel. Sorry not sorry.
@@Motleymick "a single tank of fuel?" Yikes.
Space isn't called "space" for nothing. As astronaut Bill Anders put it while enroute to the Moon on Apollo 8, “...Isaac Newton is doing most of the driving now.” Once a spacecraft has momentum, there're no impediments (like atmosphere) to stop it or slow it down, so it takes less fuel than you might think to travel those 230+ thousand miles.
You've been watching too much Star Trek.
My folks took me to the Cape for the launch of this mission. I still recon it as one of the high points of my life. 8 miles away, and we could feel the thunder of the liftoff through our feet as we watched. Followed the rest of the mission on TV, daily.
Thats very cool
Woah lucky i wish
@@jr9710 oh, so I guess all of the billions of other people who have an IQ above room temperature are also lying? That hundreds of years ago people like Galileo figure out the planet was round, hundreds of years later apparently it is flat again? Or at least to the small amount of people who apparently “know the truth”
@@quantumpotential7639 please shut up
But you had no clue it was only going to circle at lower Earth orbit and come right back. Then we were shown this footage from a Hollywood studio.
I miss this. I miss when we were proud of our scientists and engineers. We attempted the unthinkable and actually did it. God, I really miss that.
Quale Dio?😂 l'Uomo, semmai.......
Hello? You aren't proud of things like the James Webb telescope for example?
I'm afraid the internet has brought World wide insanity as a by-product.
hoax
@@mandrill173…is a fool
Imagine just standing there, in the moment ON THE MOON looking back at earth. Knowing your the only human and will be for a very long time to experience that.
This looks far more natural. 24 FPS is a sweet spot. Doesn’t even look interpolated if you hadn’t seen the original footage.
@@mariepiThere is no stars because the Moon is so bright, if you look up at the nightsky and look for the moon you can see how bright it is yet how dark it is in this Video, that's because they have to turn down the sensitivity of the Camera for it to not look like a white blinding mess.
@@mariepi Im tired of people like you. Stars are not visible cause the camera is recording a really bright surface, and the exposures time was fast, stars are dim, not giving the camera enough light to show up in the photos.
@@ok.6539 What an ignorant reply. It's quite possible the person has no knowledge of this, or could be a young person.
@@kevza1978 Maybe they should learn to educate themselves before implying it's fake then. Young people more than anyone should know how easily you can get information with a 2 second google search.
@@TwitchCronos100 he only said there was no stars and now we've educated him as to why there was no need for everyone to jump down his throat
I love seeing historic pictures, and wondering about the people and places in them. This was no different, wondering what the astronauts must have felt, thought, said in the moments that we don't see on video. Imagining what went on around the flag, and the vehicle that were left behind. There is so much life in everything, and everyone, it would take multiple lifetimes to explore it all, but I am just happy for a glimpse of even the smallest bits.
Look again ruclips.net/video/JhvHoWCRuN0/видео.html
it looks funny
Don't be so gullible.
@@DoubleoP Wow, you waited a year to post that inane comment.
@@smeeself wow, you're so clever. 😀
@Paul Nope. Just not a conspiracy nutter.
( so... I suppose, relatively, probably. )
Wow how amazing.. I was born in 1977 and am blown away every time I see this
Props to the camera man waiting for them to arrive
And which footage, exactly, do you think was taken by this mystery "camera man"?
@@Tim22222 the moon footage, the one that is on the video
@@nugs2727 it was one of the astronauts who had gotten out first, set up the camera, and recorded the second one getting out.
@@archierush868 No the cameraman waited for them to arrive
@@nugs2727which is more likely:
NASA sending another astronaut without telling anyone to already land on the moon but not have his Lunar Lander within view of the descent of the actual lander and only be there to record them getting out.
Or one of them got out first, set up a camera, and record the other getting out.
When something is so unbelievable like this, ppl sadly resort to unbelieving it.
I agree, this thing is majestic
Yep.
The masses of ignorant people in the world including Moon landing denying cultist, flat earthers, and other fringe conspiracy theorists:
A group of people who very likely suffer from an array of psychological issues; chief among which is Identity-Protective Cognition. There are certain markers that preclude those who fall for cult’s schemes and tactics for example. These markers overlap when dealing with conspiracy theorists and those that deny facts due to their feelings. Often times it deals with not feeling special or chronic low self esteem/insecurities mixed with deep-seated trust issues, likely brought on by trauma, and an insatiable need to feel important; what would make someone feel more important than thinking they know better than most of the people on Earth and all of the scientific community. It’s a desperate ploy and vicious cycle of needing to feel important and a sense they belong.
@@DemonDrummerprojecting much?
@@trendynow1369 Nope, but way to ironically/hypocritically project in your comment accusing me of doing just that. Remember, you’re the one that believes unfounded nonsense and unproven speculative subjective conjecture based on nothing but ignorance, feelings, and fallacious logic.
Let that sink in. 🤗
Do better, learn.
@@DemonDrummer Here's how to prove this was fake:
1. Change your video to .25 speed, the slowest speed on the RUclips settings.
2. Go to the part where they take off, start about 9:57.
3. Watch the footprints closely as they withstand what makes the flag violently move.
This stuff is incredible. Even though I know the outcome I get so nervous watching the landing and the lengthy ascent. The improved frame rate makes it more real - and more scary! Thanks so much.
Yeah I was a little worried they were gonna run out of fuel on decent. Maybe we can hear the nerves in their voices.
@@TheOneNashon how?
I get that way every time I watch Apollo 13 the movie.
It’s fake
@@rawnuklesWell that wouldn’t happen because the place they filmed it they had a fuel station near by, Hollywood always comes prepared bro !
Honestly, if someone watches this whole thing and has any semblance of intelligence, it’s easy to see and comprehend that’s it’s real af.
And that is still just so freaking insane and awe inspiring. Watching this almost brings a tear to my eye, trying to put myself in their shoes… completely insane. We have really lost our way in this country these days when it comes to science and trying to achieve things that seem otherwise impossible.
Lol... How hurtful it is to know, they all (everyone who went to the moon) did it for the country... For humanity.. but still people saying that it all was fake 💔
I knew Edgar Mitchell. On my desk, I've got a really nice autographed photo of him holding a map on the Moon that Al Shepard took during one of their EVAs. It's always so wild to hear a friend's familiar voice in these recordings from the lunar surface. It really is a small world - or pair of worlds in this case. Thanks for posting this footage.
@Крым,Ялта ,Александр. Nope, not stupid at all. There is no air or wind on the moon. The flag had a horizontal metal tube inserted in a pocket sewn along the top edge. That was to hold the flag out and make it look like it was fluttering in the breeze. Otherwise, it would just drape down over the pole and not be very visible. The movement you can see is the flag settling down after being rammed into the lunar surface. With no air, there's no air resistance on the Moon, so it takes a while for the motion to settle down due to inertia.
There is solar wind, but that works differently and would not cause the flag to flutter. Solar wind particles have very little mass and you would not notice any movement they might cause.
Edgar said it’s was a hoax
@@joshuasasfire2759source please. I’d like to see that for myself.
I’m here to tell you that this shit was faker than unicorns!
@@bullymaguire4457 : naive.
if anybody has eyes, you'd see that the flag only moves when it's being touched, and has been designed to act more rigid so it can be seen. god some people are idiots, sorry folks, it's real. The coolest thing humanity has ever done is real and I guess you can enjoy it or something if you wanna.
If there is little gravity on the moon why the bar across the top of the flag and not the bottom?
@@markvenuti7263gonna be honest, had a stroke reading that
Amazing, this happened before i was born. I hope i can watch another moonlanding live, i will be just inches away from the tv screen i can assure you.😊
I was in High School / Jr. High during the apollo missions and yes... it was and is still exciting to me. Can't wait for the Artemis missions... Ad Astra!
you guys been fooled big time@@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke
Absolutely amazing quality footage. Never seen this before
hoax
How to say you are scientifically illiterate without saying you are scientifically illiterate@@mandrill173
@@mandrill173prove it ret@rd
FAKE ASF
@mandrill173 You are proof that Crack babies can make it to adulthood. Albeit with a bit of brain damage.
This is an amazing accomplishment. Great vid. Cheers
I try to put myself in he shoes of people watching this live and it sends chills up my spine. Great job. It is still incredible to see humanity at its best. No matter what anybody says or how hard we try to prove otherwise, we really are a damn smart bunch of monkeys!
I watched it live. I was 15 years old. What a time to be alive!
Very true. We sure are assholes, but we sure are smart too.
Chills up your spine, seriously?
Kundalini 😅💫
@@Nekomesha ikr lmao
Alan Shepard was the only Mercury program astronaut to make it to the Moon during Apollo. That’s why he’s my favorite astronaut. Favorite mission? Apollo 8.
I think he was also one of the astronaut in this video. He also landed on the moon but i can’t remember which one, but i think it’s 14
@@archierush868
Yes, that is him in the suit with the commander’s red stripes.
@@dansv1I knew he was in this one. Also played golf on the moon
I love watching how far the dust flies... it keeps going and going.
True. Recently someone did a study and determined that some of the dust kicked up by the LM's descent engine may have traveled a quarter of the way around the moon before it finally came down.
@@joevignolor4u949 one of the apollo missions also landed near (few hundred feet, I think) a probe we landed earlier, and the dust pretty much stripped all the paint off it and destroyed its lens
@@TheAechBomb You are talking about Apollo 12. They also cut off the probe's TV camera and its robotic arm that had scooped up some lunar soil. Both of those components were brought back and are now in a museum and I've seen them on display. Also, the TV camera had live bacteria living inside of it that was there when the camera was manufactured. It had survived several years being on the moon.
@@joevignolor4u949 I didn't know which one it was, thank you
The only time that flag will ever be 'blowing in the wind'
INDIA 🇮🇳 made history by becoming the only country to land on the south pole of Moon.
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Vande mataram 🇮🇳🇮🇳
@@siddheshnalawade5380 which city u live?
Yes🎉
Vande mataram
Yes I'm from Hyderabad 🚩
I wonder what parts of the lunar lander those are that can be seen flying off during lift off from the moon, looks like sheets of foil
This moments amazing 😮
Scientists then:
"Wow, we actually went to the moon and back!"
Scientists now:
"Ah for Fu** sake, the earth isn't flat!"
#SadTimes
9:59 #leaves on the moon.
@@whatisdoneinthedarkwillbeb9204 That's rocks you smooth brain
No humans went to mokn with that shitty technology lol the only spaceship wich will be able to sent people to moon and mars will be the starship of spacex..
Stop believing this fake story..
It wasnt nasa fault though goverment forced them to lie about this moon landing
@@ArjanTV the fuck kind of Olympic gold medal getting, world record-setting mental gymnastics has you convinced that only SpaceX will succeed in getting us to Moon and Mars, but NASA has faked the moon landing?
@@CommentCritic ikr like if elon was listing to this dude he'd slap the shit back into his ass and out his throat he'd be that pissed off imagine spending ur whole life as a astronaut and go to the moon witch is an amazing feat of ingenuity
Since the first space x launch that I watched live all the way to docking, I haven’t stopped watching space exploration videos. This is fascinating to say the least. I do hope we get to that point where you can buy a ticket and fly to space just like traveling to another country.
Mr Man Too, its really interesting
My dad said we was offered a trip just into orbit and back when he was working for this company. It would have been like $300k and that was in 70s
That last part is very cool, but sadly that'd be like a thing during the age of being a type 2 civilisation with multiple stars to travel across.
@@stmsin even if he had accepted that, it likely would have never happened anyways. considering we have only had one singular private mission to low earth orbit in that style, that happening in the 70s is a pipedream. the majority of spaceflight startups die within a year or two. SpaceX was a good example of how close and fast bankruptcy comes.
commercial space travel will be sick.
Я русский и я верю, что вы были на Луне. И я рад. Такие вещи должны делаться сообща. Но вы молодцы! Уважаю вас.
Im glad there’s someone here that can watch the footage and not make up things. Theres too many people that can’t accept the fact that humans are more advanced than we really are. I’ve made points where people claim it’s fake and i point out that Russian or Chinese satellites orbiting the moon have taken pictures of the landing site and have seen the lunar lander. That’s undeniable proof right there. 3 independent space agencies that have loose ties with each other, all seeing the same thing on the moon that one of them left behind.
Feel free to use this an example for any other people saying the moon landing is fake.
No human has never been on the moon.
Thats all holywood crap made by Stanley Cubrick, as he admitted much later in the film Shining.
Nicely done
Wonderful.
Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful.
- Lorence Welk's favorite phrase.
That feeling of landing on a celestial being just seems so exiting to me for some reason.
the distance would freak me out lol
yes, like destroying the mother earth isn't exciting anymore, lets discover some more to satisfy the human ego
@@chandruishwar1what?
I agree, but something that makes me sad is realising that 99% of the time the celestial beings are barren. When considering how empty and lifeless most are, it makes me feel so special and lucky to live on Earth, with its millions of creatures and wonders.
Avevo 8 anni quando ho visto in diretta le immagini del 1⁰ allunaggio.
Amazing footage. Brings back memories.
didnt happen
FASCINATING!!!
To say the least. WOW!!!
I used to watch film of the Apolo mission as a kid in my space suit my mom made for me, upside down on the couch pretending I was about to lift off on a Saturn V. Still instills so much pride in what we as a unified nation accomplished, and what we contributed to the world.
@L. Dega i mean theres proof, satellites have taken pictures, the Chinese rover on the moon has proven it, and what would the Chinese gain from furthering a American lie if we didnt land on the moon? But no, you're right, we didn't and theres no proof.
@L. Dega no it didn't, it landed in Mare Imbrium which is on the light side of the moon.
@L. Dega ok you've answered nothing. I did the research and gave you an actual location on the moon, which i cross referenced with multiple credible sources and you follow up with " NO!!!! LOL it landed on the far side dude" very convincing argument. But I guess we'll see just how wrong you are when the Artemis program goes back to the moon, with hi-res photos but youll probably deny those as well.
Incredible 😮
I love how casual this looks when taking the pic, its literally like taking a photo of yourself in front of some landmark when on holiday. i'm surprised he's not putting some thumbs up or pointing at the flag lmao pose man!
Kinda hard to in those suits.
@@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl if they can hammer a pole into the ground, they can lift their arm to thumbs up...
@@terpz47 The reason they couldn't hammer it in was because of the surface
@@gabedrinkswaterthey hammered it pretty well seeing as when they flew off you could see the amount of force was blown onto it and it didnt fall over…
@@SincerelyYoursLIVE it literally fell over
Wow. How does this not have more views. Good work duder.
Post it on Reddit in appropriate subreddit, and it'll get exposure
Francot12 idiots like you who think it is fake?
Couchmann941 idiots like you who thinks this is real
@@Francot12 Chill bro sheeeiiittt.
People are sick and tired of NASA lies and bullshit. We only want to see it exposed and terminated forever.
5.42 : what is the stick like material looking forward on 100 meter?
Its studio mistake
Some lighting coming from the door
They have not closed studio door properly
@@kaleem9093 it was real
Not from a studio
I personally love the comments about the flag moving in the wind, whilst they insist filming is carried out within a studio.
Aww dude you left the wind machine switched on.
Oh, and forgot to light up the stars 😔
😂and dont forget the moon buggy they must of had that on the roofrack
@@stevebowtell6763 you know you can find diagrams online of how it was stored on the LEM and how they deployed it?
@@stevebowtell6763 They didn't forget their hard as a rock fake astronaut to drive the thing though.
I’m always amazed at scales on the moon. Distance is impossible to judge. When they land those craters just look like the large ones but they’re only a foot across!
in Kerbal space program I always orient myself using the shadow of the landing craft, even after a new update introduced the "altitude from the ground" meter that showed your exact distance to the ground and not to sea level. unfortunately for the astronauts, they don't have 3rd-person-view and magic displays that are always correct
Haynes publishing has a really neat book on the Lunar Rover where that problem is discussed. One component of it is that the less than perfectly clear atmosphere here on Earth give that distance haze effect & and another is the presence of things where we know their general scale, such as trees on distant hills. And there was none of that on the moon.
Scott FW It must be a really weird sensation. Clarity everywhere! Even Mars’ thin atmosphere is enough to give it that Earth like hazy distance. I live in the mountains in Japan and the haze is something that makes every morning look different.
Thats cuz the moon isnt real is an artificial megastructure made by god to watch over earth... depth of craters isnt adding up to the moon tickness ratio and the moon itself seems to be hollow inside at ceirtan depth
@@maximpikalev9538 exactly----what I thought
This is awesome!!! One of the greatest achievement in human history.
One of the greatest hoax in human history*
@@tehflooper you are one of the dumbest people of human history*
@@kinderfett5259 "luk at me, im intelligent, you dumb, nasa nasa, usa usa".
@@tehflooper ?
anyways, ohh my check from NASA finally came.
Still wicked exciting!
2:10 what is the thing in the left bottom corner? Is it any mission's lander or just a moon rock?
Alien.
Great work mate. I love everything about the Apollo program
www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/
@@ancelrick5396 wow, this is great. Thanks
@@andrewangerer1399 I enjoyed it when I stumbled onto it. They seem to be the complete film rolls, crappy pictures and all
@@ancelrick5396 Wow! Great page Ancel Rick! There is like every photo in Apollo history there!
At age 9, going on 10, it was a magical time to be alive and seeing the first Moon Launch and Landing live on TV. It seemed like an eternity while watching all the prior test Launches from the fatal tragedy of Apollo 1 on through to the Lunar Orbiter to Apollo 11's landing. Then it became a routine mission in a short span of 3 years and 5 months from 11 to 17, with the miracle of Apollo 13 in between. The Space program was bever as exciting since, with the exception of several of the Mars Rover landings.
Absolutely fantastic! 👍
faketastic
@@dj-gf9coexactly.. In this video moon seems to have bulges. But in actual it has shallow hole. They just created all this in a studio as best as they can from what they observed from telescope of what moon looks like. But moon didn't look like anything they've shown
@@ladybuggaming25okay scientist😂. You guys need to go back school lol
didnt happen
Is it possible to doubt the reality of flying to the moon after watching this video? It's really incredible, it's really cool that people were able to do this!
Possible...😅
@@tamasszakal9834 how?
@@tamasszakal9834it’s not
Sort of. We can't even get service when hiking on a mountain trail, but in 1969 they were able to tranmit via live television-from the Moon? Wow! That is incredible technology that would be nice to have today.
@@journeywithnichole986 are you joking? they couldn’t get service very well back then either, yet they could broadcast from the moon yes. That’s because those things have very little to do with each other
Vlogging in 60s be like
Imagine being on the moon and not being able to return back to earth. The fact that this never happenned in all of the Apollo missions (even Apollo 13 was saved) speaks about the incredible team of scientists and engineers behind this humongous endeavor. No smartphones back then, just smartpeople
Truly a shame some think we faked all of it.
Suerte que no había llegado Elon Musk para echar una manita.
this was shot inside a studio by stanley kubrick who made the movie 2001 space odyssey one year before this.. see the flag is moving by wind but moon has no wind 😂 usa did it to beat soviet union's roscosmos
Fakest shit
@@Deb_deCoder *this was shot inside a studio by stanley kubrick who made the movie 2001 space odyssey one year before this..*
"2001 Space Odyssey" is nowhere near quality of real thing kiddo.
Что сказать то. Просто потрясающе. Это сейчас то выглядит как фантастика, а тогда так это вообще уму не постижимо. Браво, молодцы, что ещё сказать.
нас в школе учили что тень на Луне абсолютно черная в виду отсутствия атмосферы и в тени ничего не видно. То что мы видим что то в тени на Земле, это свойства воздуха.
А ещё они оставили там медали в честь первых людей в космосе, таких как Гагарин несмотря на то что тогда была холодная война в разгаре. Очень хороший жест.
@@bobododoo3925 просто качество обучения в вашей школе плохое. Поэтому вы глупый выросли😊
@@Healton это как посмотреть. В вакууме тень должна быть контрастной, однородной. А атмосферы на луне нет.
We wouldn’t have gotten there without you ruskies
As I recall reading, the swaying of the LEM ascent stage was done to keep down weight and complexity of the ascent engine, and also to simplify the code of the LEM's guidance computer. Basically, the ascent engine's nozzle doesn't gimble, instead the RCS is employed during ascent to keep the LEM on the correct trajectory, but there is a lag which is what causes the swaying.
Auch nach 50 Jahren immer noch beeindruckend und faszinierend! Tolle Aufnahmen.
Idk why but i find the movements of the crew so adorable. The way they just move around. Hold things and just stare at the things they are doing something with.
The way they just mind their business is so adorable
The way they just stand is so derpy
agreed
Same here! The way they hop around with what looks like a bookbag and the boots is adorable 😃
That is so weird 😕
What is that crack or sometimes thing at 12:40
Is this the only footag of the moonwalks of Apollo 14? I don't know if it's just me or why is it so hard to find high quality videos of all the missions?
look up March to the moon and they have all photos and stuff frmo all missions
An amazing feat given the technology of the day. Some brilliant engineering.
They had reliable communication with the module lander. It really was a feat. Lots of math involved. Apollo 13 was the only mission I think that didn’t land on the moon.
@@cwstewartjr1973 where do you think we get radio waves and microwaves and heat waves from? The air around us. Even then communication existed even in the early 1900s. So if your phone loses signal take it with your phone company. They should have towers around your area. You’re paying them to provide a service without interruption.
LOL I love the people bringing up the flag moving as if it’s proof of a hoax, even though it gets explained to them literally every time they bring it up.
Forget the flag moving. There's so much more to think about. The live footage that wasn't live. The grainy black and white footage. In 1963 a civilian filmed the JFK assassination in colour. 6 years later the wealthiest (tax funded) organisation recorded the biggest event ever undertaken by mankind in poor quality black and white footage. No one has been back to the moon since. So many modern luna rovers have landed on the moon. There's modern satellites, rovers and the launch of the JWT. Nothing has proved the biggest event in human history. Why? The JWT is able see the universe in a way that was unimaginable. So when the JWT was launched Why not point it at the moon landing? Why are all moon rover landings no where near the Apollo Landings? The moon landings have been a conspiracy since day 1. Why not have a rover/satellite pass over the site and use the amazing modern cameras to film it? Such evidence would silence the non believer's. Modern technology has done nothing to prove the haters wrong.
Why now?
GREAT
Fascinating to see the dust fly so far just from their shuffling around.
Plus that touchdown with the regalith getting blasted straight into lunar orbit!
That's what confirmed it wasn't faked (as people have said), for me.
Good observation. I always wondered how close ups of the gold thermal wrap around the LM's legs dont appear to show any dust.
@@rtreaper9985 YEP< it would be stupid to repeat the mistakes , the second time around.
Looks like landing would have kicked so much dust that they wouldn't see anything for days. It was clear immediately.
That dust is actually a huge hazard for the astronauts and equipment. It's so fine and sharp, it is terrible if you inhale it.
And still some dudes gonna say “it’s fake NASA never goes to moon” I mean what NASA feels when they hear this. You guys will never no how hard it was to land on moon.
Because its all fake lol
@@xxmemekipxxlastname4846is an idiot prove it then.
@@wolfbbq6076 you prove that it did happen.
XxMemekipxX last name The vast body of evidence supports the reality of the Apollo programme. The onus is on you - and pointing at images declaring them to be fake because of “reasons” is not evidence. I wait with baited breath.......
@@martinc3918 dude i dont understand half the words youre saying but thats not proof it happened
It's almost 2024 and it's still amazing. I cannot imagine what people thought in 1969.
It was amazing....and still is.
Сколько секунд проработал двигатель при взлёте с луны при выходе на орбиту? Судя по ролику и видом на лунную поверхность с 9:50 они поднимались на воздушном шаре.
Я в сомнении, хотя всегда был уверен в посещении луны.
Подробностей t работы двигателя при взлёте с луны, не нашёл....
This is fascinating
9:49 old mate left his esky behind!
Yeah, they threw their PLSS (Personal Life Support System) out the hatch of the LM before ascent to save weight.
@@campbellwright3743 as moon landing is due on in future wish they retrieve the same and bring it back to earth to check what solar flare effect.
Man, the quality of this footage is awesome.
didnt happen
Spacewalk lowkey looked like a budget VR game for a sec or two with the increased frame rate 😂
Can someone answer me this? On the liftoff why is the camera work so shaky, as if a person is holding it? I'm assuming the camera is mounted to the craft so it should be stable as fuck, except for stabilizing thrusters of course....but the camera is moving around like a found footage film.
The camera is indeed mounted to the craft - and it is "stable as fuck". You are assuming the camera is moving when the terrain moves. The terrain moves because the orientation of the craft is moving. It's not really difficult to figure out. Do you see the black outline of the ascent module WINDOW? Clearly, the camera is FIXED and NOT MOVING AT ALL with respect to the WINDOW OF THE CRAFT!!!! It's the CRAFT that is moving; not the camera.
Jesus.......
this is so crazy the more you think about it. just imagine youre one of them, you just landed further than anyone from earth
tipo in Texas?
@@fabiorizzoli1357 No, the moon
They say that Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landing, but was such a perfectionist that he demanded they film On Location.
Poor him, still shaking. Lies are not good to karma, even if you are forced or driven. I give him some heart, because he (may) overcome his wow-ego, in the way, he put some ridiculously in the story and in his work. He put a seed of truth in any story, that is why we can call him genious. Maybe, a Hero, if the seed will grow. But this ist still a question.
@@PatrickLensch , mate, get help. Seriously.
@@UteChewb a lie is a lie, no help will change that 🥱
Patrick Lensch, but when it’s not a lie, it’s not a lie.
@@Icemanin1994 is that true? 'No lie is no lie'. I do not like to handle with lies ... 😅 but: truth is truth 🙏
Kubrick is The master...any other movie ??
Remarkable! Thank you for this.
didnt happen
4:10 landing
9:53 liftoff
hoax
This is such a fantastic video. My parents were alive to see this actually happening on their T.V.s. Despite seeing the Challenger explode and Columbia peeling apart on re-entry I still wanna go to space one day orbital or suborbital
I was 8 at the time, and I remember a very blurry black and white image of neil armstrong setting foot on the moon. it's one of those moments that you always remember where you were. the first image from the surface of Mars in 76 came down. of course the challenger explosion, 9/11, the eruption of mt st helens woke me up out of my bed hundreds of miles away, it was so loud I thought it might be a nuclear bomb, the watergate hearings that summer of 73, jimmy carters surprise defeat in the 1980 election to ronald regan. the fall of the berlin wall, the night that trump won, etc etc
@Andre you must have just finished watching the breathless 1 year anniversary of jan 6th, on msnbc cnn, abc, nbc, cbs, pbs bbc the new york times, the wash post. yes, JUST like 9/11, pearl harbor, of course. 9/11, 3,000 people killed, pearl habor the beginning of world war two with japan and 2,000 more dead. jan 6th? one person died, and she was shot by a capital police guy, two others that died were from heart attacks or one guy died a day later from a stroke. fabricated news stories about how they "insurrectionists" tried to beat to death a police officer with a fire extinguisher. Ok, now's the part where you accuse me of only watching fox news.
for me, the reason why I remembered where I was on the night trump got elected, was not because I particularly liked trump, I did not and did not vote for him and I still find him a bit of a fool, what I found so memorable, was the utter shock from these networks that trump won. I found it highly entertaining how shocked and stunned they were. how could t his possibly happen? they were so depressed, so upset. hillary was so upset she couldn't bear to even address her followers. it was a glorious thing to watch
@Andre "more recently, there have been differing reports that he was injured by a fire extinguisher and that he did not suffer any blunt force injuries. His own MOTHER said she believed he died from a stroke the next day, not from a fatal blow to the head. "New ruling of his death has been officially attributed to strokes, prompting "reevalution" of initial coverage" (By all the above media outlets) "commenting on a time article "One would never know from reading this (the first reports that he had been hit in the head with a fire ext, or, even BEATEN TO DEATH with it. Brutally beaten to death! had a big gash on his head! ) that's what was first reported.
"That false account was widely quoted in yet another media fiasco"
@Andre uhh, all I did was say because you compared trump winning an election to 3,000 people murdered, killed, on 9/11.I just thought you were the type that would just relish that jan 6th 1 year anniversary of that riot that they play on a loop on all those networks. you compared trump winning an election to 9/11, then your fearless progressive leaders went on and compared jan 6th to 9/11 also. so I thought you had good company there. get some help for your TDS although I'm not so sure there is a cure because you guys are just too far gone.
@Andre uhh, your the one that responded first with something that had nothing to do with the topic.you compared trump winning an election to 9/11. so I responded to that insanity. then you say keep on the topic. and anything I say you say is "nonsense" "gibberish" "out of context" etc. look it up for yourself that is if google searches would ever have anything from something other than the NY times, the wash post, the la times, msnbc, etc. how can you just called "nonsense" that his own mother said he died from a stroke. this is out there, this is proven. the media jumped on the whole bashing his head in with a fire extinguisher with ZERO evidence. I didn't give any context or sources because that would make for an overly long post. for proof, is msnbc, or the various democrats on the senate hearings now claiming that this guy was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher? no, because its simply not true. but it was widely reported right after the jan 6th riot. because the left wing news outlets wanted it to look as bad as they possibly could, so they just went with it without knowing what actually happened.
fact, the media said he was "beaten to death" by a raging rioter with a fire extinguisher. fact, he died the next day from a stroke. he had no, nothing nada zero wounds on his head or anywhere.those are the facts. they wanted to promote the image of this poor cop being beaten to death with a blunt object by trump supporters, in order to further their agenda. not one rioter who got inside was armed, not one. people on the left always say to cops, why couldn't you just use a taser? why did you have to shoot the poor person? or just shoot them in the leg, etc. but this cop just shot her dead for climbing through a door. she was no threat to anybody. she was a mom, a military vet who served in the gulf war. she most certainly did not "deserve" to be shot dead.
eles sobem e vão se distanciando porem as formações no chão lunar ne, nao mudar de tamanho na imagem e como e fosse algo girando frente a câmera como nao duvidar disso...
As montanhas estão a uma grande distância, é por isso.
Does anyone know whats with the feedback on the comms? Is that just from how NASA relayed the data?
Even though it is a little fuzzy now. I remember watching this on our old Hoffman TV. Thanks for the memories.
How crazy is it though we actually went to the freaking moon. After tens of thousands of years of evolution we actually got on top of a giant ass bomb and hopped onto another world. Never gets old
No hope for you believing it that cr*p
@@flat-earther hahahaha you actually censored crap? what are you bro like 12? Get back to school kiddo and read a book
@@flat-earther get a life
They must have thought why is the flag moving in the wind, why do we have wires on our back holding us up and who was already here video taping us landing and coming out....stupid
Lol! Well done! The hoax nut trifecta of stupid questions!
yes you are