Nate Smith - Skip Step

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
  • From the album "KINFOLK: Postcards from Everywhere"
    © 2016 Waterbaby Music Inc./Ropeadope LLC

Комментарии • 95

  • @gxdhabakkagw6268
    @gxdhabakkagw6268 4 года назад +88

    Just thought I’d tell everybody that according to Nate himself on Instagram, the song is felt in 4/4, 3/4, then 3/8

    • @UkuleleAversion
      @UkuleleAversion 4 года назад +6

      That makes the most sense

    • @madebymarco
      @madebymarco 3 года назад +6

      Doesn't really matter coz I'm totally feeling the song! lol

    • @whirlybird76
      @whirlybird76 3 года назад +4

      That's great, I was feeling it in Cut Common 4,4,4,5

    • @0tf850
      @0tf850 3 года назад

      thank you!

    • @Brunototguitar
      @Brunototguitar 2 года назад

      I'd make it simpler to think (at least for me) as 2 bars: 4/4 and "4 1/2" it works great for me 😉

  • @trustnugget280
    @trustnugget280 4 года назад +51

    You know the music is wild when nearly all comments are about the time signature

  • @ArmandoAbrantes-Ferreira
    @ArmandoAbrantes-Ferreira 9 дней назад +1

    This song reminds me a lot of the music from the state of Bahia, Brazil, particularly the musical style "Axé". Black American USA and Black American Brazilian peoples share a lot of common roots! (Americans are those born in continent America).

  • @asmaitre
    @asmaitre 22 минуты назад

    This song is brutal, it blew my mind trying to figure out the time signature. Thanks for all the info in the comments, now I can sleep peacefully.

  • @tyubacka
    @tyubacka 4 года назад +10

    Try dancing to this sober 🤣🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️

  • @johnalfredkonig8490
    @johnalfredkonig8490 6 лет назад +19

    I don't know what to say, I just keep playing it

  • @AWSMcube
    @AWSMcube 2 года назад +6

    im trying to learn the basics of music theory so i hopped on a call with a couple of my music buddies, they taught me about time signature and for my first assignment i was supposed to figure out this song's time signature

  • @idlebirdmusic
    @idlebirdmusic 6 лет назад +68

    4/4 to 9/8 back to 4/4... Nate... you truly are a beast bro

    • @lucasdemello8655
      @lucasdemello8655 5 лет назад +10

      Its 8/8 then 9/8

    • @sdictson7750
      @sdictson7750 5 лет назад +2

      4/4 4/4 4/4 then 5/4 ... but either one would work the same.

    • @danielbrazil4683
      @danielbrazil4683 4 года назад +6

      @@sdictson7750 4/4, 3/4, 3/8

    • @gijsgranitzer6818
      @gijsgranitzer6818 4 года назад +5

      The correct way to notate this is 17/8 but to play it is easier if you split it up in 8/8 and then 9/8

    • @leandropaz3228
      @leandropaz3228 4 года назад +3

      17/8 8+6+3

  • @avec2ailes941
    @avec2ailes941 5 лет назад +19

    Oh my god ... this should become a jazz or funk standard!!! :))))

    • @TFARN
      @TFARN Год назад +2

      ABSOLUTELY!!

  • @LudwigSC93
    @LudwigSC93 3 года назад +4

    First time I'm hearing this band. Great stuff. I'm hearing some EW&F.

  • @soufienkhalfaoui7593
    @soufienkhalfaoui7593 Год назад +4

    Timeless groove. Not everyday and everyone groove. Sheesh man...

  • @isaacraz
    @isaacraz 4 года назад +5

    7/4 +3/8? (in other words "feeling" 2 measures of 4/4 with the last quarter note divided into two dotted 8ths instead of 16ths) thoughts?

    • @johannesebster5764
      @johannesebster5764 4 года назад

      makes sense. could even name it 4/4 + 2/4 + 5/8. It's totally a 4/4 feel, with the last quarter of the two bar cycle being extended by one eighth.

    • @UkuleleAversion
      @UkuleleAversion 4 года назад

      You’re correct, everyone else is getting it wrong. Nate Smith himself said this except he grouped into 4/4, 3/4 and 3/8 which makes even more sense because you can hear those three groups in the cycle really clearly.

  • @TrevWILL79
    @TrevWILL79 6 лет назад +40

    This time signature is off the the charts!!!

    • @you7400
      @you7400 6 лет назад +4

      its in 4/4

    • @briantremper844
      @briantremper844 6 лет назад +9

      with an extra eighth note every other bar

    • @idlebirdmusic
      @idlebirdmusic 6 лет назад +23

      It’s 4/4 going into 9/8 back into 4/4.... or you can count it in 17/8

    • @no.mans.guy.
      @no.mans.guy. 6 лет назад +8

      Its 3 bars of 4 and 1 bar of 5. Its on the charts cuz my teacher just gave me it haha

    • @etlicheSobis
      @etlicheSobis 5 лет назад

      Can also be 17/8... hutch-drums.com/2017/02/01/nate-smith-skip-step/

  • @st0mpz_G
    @st0mpz_G 7 лет назад +11

    If someone can come up with a dance to this I will like comment and subscribe. ;)

    • @RisikoAO
      @RisikoAO 7 лет назад +5

      This is too complicated for dancers, it'a an irregular beat (it adds 1/8 every two bars).
      RUclips dancers will have a mental breakdown with everything that is not 4/4

    • @st0mpz_G
      @st0mpz_G 7 лет назад +1

      I mean, you and I are technically both dancers, and are both aware of the extra beat! Perhaps you are just a 5 hour energy away from that subscription...

    • @harshpeter
      @harshpeter 7 лет назад +3

      It's not too complicated for dancers :D it is a hard piece to choreograph,that's true but that's it.

    • @stevieraydevriesandries2596
      @stevieraydevriesandries2596 6 лет назад +2

      You Skip-Step instead you Go-Nuts

    • @kendrickgainey
      @kendrickgainey 4 года назад +2

      Then call a medic.

  • @simonstuart1325
    @simonstuart1325 5 лет назад +5

    its 17/8 funk, two bar cycle, check out andrew hutchings drums for the chart .

    • @UkuleleAversion
      @UkuleleAversion 4 года назад +4

      Better to feel it as a mixed metre rather than a big block of eighth notes that doesn’t support the groove

  • @realatomizer
    @realatomizer Год назад +1

    Some people need coffee in the morning. Some need their sigaret. I need Skip Step every day.

  • @tristanlanza6921
    @tristanlanza6921 Год назад +1

    First off, big fan of Nate Smith, but is it just me or does this song begin or sounds just a bit like Talking Heads- Once in a Lifetime?

  • @andreadaniel8792
    @andreadaniel8792 2 года назад +11

    Woke up with this song in my head. 👏🏾👏🏾❤️❤️❤️❤️

    • @soufienkhalfaoui7593
      @soufienkhalfaoui7593 2 года назад +2

      Everyday for me too. Stuck in my head for years now. Hahahahaha!!!

  • @spectralstreamer
    @spectralstreamer 3 месяца назад

    teletubies

  • @aalbaglii
    @aalbaglii 5 лет назад +4

    I absolutely LOOOVEEE THIS

  • @pisceslove9
    @pisceslove9 5 лет назад +4

    Omg this song is sick!! Gotta get this.

  • @milesleblanc164
    @milesleblanc164 5 лет назад +9

    This song is brilliant mathematically and musically. Two bars of 6/8 plus a bar of five equals 17/8

    • @johannesebster5764
      @johannesebster5764 4 года назад +3

      ok but why split it that way? I think it makes more sense to split it 4/4 + 9/8 or even 4/4 + 3/4 + 3/8

    • @milesleblanc164
      @milesleblanc164 4 года назад +1

      @@johannesebster5764 That makes more sense to you, and it's cool that a different method works for you. But this is the process in feel that makes the most sense to me personally. Take it or leave it I guess. Have a good day. :)

    • @UkuleleAversion
      @UkuleleAversion 4 года назад +5

      Nah, that’s just plain wrong. The downbeats of your guess don’t match the harmonic rate. Nate Smith himself explained it as 4/4, 3/4 & 3/8 which grooves 1000x better than counting to 6 eighth notes (breaking over into the next part of the metre “3/4”) then another 6 and 5. This is not subjective. Just listen to the drums.

    • @naattxxnaattxx7055
      @naattxxnaattxx7055 5 месяцев назад

      To me that's such a wierd way to count it, but it's cool seeing people count it in different methods.

  • @clovaperez-corral9298
    @clovaperez-corral9298 6 лет назад +5

    This is awesome

  • @ToddTheJoker
    @ToddTheJoker 5 лет назад +2

    Is that an Acrolite in the pic?

  • @romanandia8959
    @romanandia8959 3 года назад +1

    Steve Reich would be proud

  • @FilippoMilan
    @FilippoMilan 3 года назад +1

    Bro i'm legit confused

  • @Idanbo
    @Idanbo Год назад

    Its kinda 17/8 that is played as 7/4 and 3/8.

  • @odedfried-gaon2880
    @odedfried-gaon2880 2 года назад

    Fantastic!
    #OdedMusic #OdedFriedGaon #Audioded

  • @williamtaylor5320
    @williamtaylor5320 2 года назад

    17

  • @RC-nn1ld
    @RC-nn1ld 6 лет назад

    What's the time signature?

    • @buenobus
      @buenobus 6 лет назад +1

      That is not quite right. It is as Jeremy Idlebird said above. It's counted as a bar of 4/4 followed by a bar of 9/8.

    • @reiniervanzwieten7092
      @reiniervanzwieten7092 6 лет назад

      Adrian K. Yee Can't you just count 17/16?

    • @buenobus
      @buenobus 6 лет назад +2

      Reinier van zwieten Here's why I would say that it is a bar of 4/4 followed by a bar of 9/8, which repeats, rather than saying the closely related claim that it is 17/16.
      The band does some fills in each of the bars '4/4' and '9/8'. If it were truly 17/16, we would expect some kind of drum fills to be done in 17/16, but that's not what we hear. So at least, given the admittedly little music theory I've done (Grade 2 Royal Conservatory of Music), that was how I was taught how to accurately represent the time-signatures of pieces with hybrid meter.

    • @reiniervanzwieten7092
      @reiniervanzwieten7092 6 лет назад

      I count it as 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9 and then the 9 is half as long that is because i don't want to count in 16ths because it's easier to count in 8ths but if you would could the 16ths i would count ever other 16th as and just because it's easier like so 1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-5-and-6-and-7-and-8-and-9-1-and-2-and-3-and-4-and-5-and-6-and-7-and-8-and-9 etc etc

    • @reiniervanzwieten7092
      @reiniervanzwieten7092 6 лет назад

      Adrian K. Yee Tbh i can't really hear the fills they do after the 4/4 there is just a slightly different use of drums. i would personally prefer to count it in 17/16 or 8 1/2 because i don't like to count fast just because it's constant and constently switching between the two seems cumbersome to me. i do have to say that i have done very little educating on rhythm based theory the education i have had has been from school and that has mostly been inside of 4/4 and 6/8 and all the odd time stuff i have learned through just counting some of the songs i listened to (i mostly listen to prog metal stuff like periphery) so i might be wrong but i still personally prefer it my way.

  • @RC-nn1ld
    @RC-nn1ld 6 лет назад

    OK 4/4 1/8 every two bars.