Chess, But It's Absolutely Normal Chess
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- If you really enjoy my content, you are more than welcome to support me with a small donation via Paypal.
Link to Paypal donation: www.paypal.me/...
Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at:
/ discord
#chess #ChessImpossible
~~Roa Music~~
Higher + Sleepless Nights + Esperanza
▶RUclips
/ roamusic
▶Spotify
open.spotify.c....
▶Soundcloud
/ roa_music1031
8:59 "Why is he thinking for so long?"
Because when your opponent makes a move that seems completely stupid, you should always triple-check that it isn't a trap.
Sometimes, I think about a M1. Last game I played, I premoved the forced move for a back rank mate. I felt good, having premoved a chevkmate.
@@groundedgaming that would mean that it was a forced mate, not a trap set by you.
Forced mate works with premove
Trap doesn't with premove, you have to wait for opponent to take the bait. You just got lucky
happens way too much for me
A 103 rated player bought premium...
@@groundedgaming If you see a mate in 1, look for better :D
Don't worry, I'll count that as a victory
Chess Simp would have lost anyways though, because of the 50-Move-Rule, which states that, if no pieces are taken in 50 turns, the game is a draw.
Chess Simp would have lost anyways though, because of the 50-Move-Rule, which states that, if no pieces are taken in 50 turns, the game is a draw.
@@Chris-wy1wh Pawn moves also reset the 50 move rule
@@Chris-wy1wh that only applies if one of the players decides it so
@@Chris-wy1wh i think promotion resets counter
Yeah, taking that last rook was a huge blunder. There was no way they were going to keep playing for long with just the king.
I just liked how simp made the guy learn en passant...
Ya same
How did you know he didn't know en passant to start with...?
@@TheHuesSciTech , he was in the 100s.
Not really, the game just showed him the could do en passant with his pawn.
@@coloradoing9172 And that's how they learned it, and it was orchestrated by Simp. So yeah, it's on Simp.
If you want a long-lasting game, then you need to keep the material balanced, not explode the game by sacrificing pieces. It wasn't even move 50 and you were already at the endgame. Your opponent resigned because there was nothing more to be done at that point.
But at the same time, if there is too much material on the board the opponents can take too long to make a.move, running out of time before move 100
Nah what he needed to do was in th eend game make it seem like he didn't know how to finish th echeckmate and hte othe rguy would speed move trying to run him out of time bring up very fast.
@Matthew Dwyer I like to try and make them stalemate
I think he got the strategy right except his endgame strategy
He should have sac'd the rook and then taken some time to get the pawn to the end of the board
That may be true in a game with no time limit. He made this choice to avoid the risk of the opponent loosing on time. Offering obvious trades all the time.
chess but every time one of your pieces is taken, you have to press f to pay respects by moving a piece onto any square on the f file
Of course he resigns when you start taunting with the king moves.
Normal chess is real, never expected that
What if modern chess is not normal
I believe another 2 videos at least should be made to get the combined 100 moves. It's only fair to the person who donated. Bless that kind hearted soul that donated $100.
I agree :D
Yup
Totaele agree
it's called donation for a reason
practically impossible though. both of you would have to take 3 seconds each move on average
That's the first thing i thought when I saw it was 5 minuts chess^^. He should have played in 10 minuts, the video wouldn't have been much longer if he edits it like the others.
3 sec × 100 moves = 300sec
300 sec is 5 min
in the endgame you can premove 10+ moves (king march and such) in no time
@@jimmyh2137 we can, but can a 100 rated player?
@@jimmyh2137 Probably not if you're 100.
Why you all saying "finally a normal game" when because of the mission he blundered pieces all the time lol
I'm rated 900, and this is a normal game
@@hitihautriponel419 How is Qxf7+ on move 3 and blunder a queen normal for 900?? Bruh you can't be that bad
They could be sarcastic lol. Either that or it's "more normal" in comparison to his other vids
Normal for 100 rated
He really played the scholars mate - impatient variation
LOL
8:57 "why he is thinking for so long?" Because the last time he ate a seemingly free piece, he lost his queen.
There was so much potential for this game to actually hit the turns... but you put in a great effort
so close yet so far
@@triplepain522 Of all the people to recognize from Discord, I was not expecting you to be one of them.
@@PhantomAarantula I was surprised myself LOL
Looks like you succeeded at the "chess, but I'm a teacher" video in this one by showing the french move at 2:46 and letting them do it at 4:44
is that a real thing where you can take directly on the side or not.
@@TilerBlevens its only possible with pawns if they're next to a pawn that moved 2 squares from their starting spot
Qxf7 was actually kinda risky because the dude could have thought "oh, it's a smurf, he's gonna kick my ass, I quit"
"+8 points of material advantage. Now he should have no reason to resign from the game" now this is what I call playing 4D chess
Bro trying to guilt trip us into giving him money. Mad respect dude, that was smart.
If you try this again, try to get a closed position in the opening, try to avoid trading as much as possible except for queens. Try to enter the endgame with a bishop or knight up, try to trade everything and promote your last pawn in a way that you get bishop and knight as checkmating with B&N takes some time and your opponent may continues to be engaged in the game trying to prevent you from mating in time.
I think the strategy was to bleed your timer below his at the end to make him think he could still win on time. It’d be risky with less than a minute left, but that was the only way I could see you not forcing a resignation.
For $100, you should keep trying until you actually get a 100 move game, I think.
Yeah
Agreed
I believe e4 was already a mistake as d4 leads to closed positions more easily which prolongs the game by about 20 moves already
My thoughts exactly!
If someone can blunder a mate in one, the video ends.
PS: If all moves available lead to a mate in one, then it doesn't count as a blunder. This includes forced moves.
Should have built a big pawn structure in the middle, that'd slow things right down.
who knew challenges like this involve psychological judgement
100 rated chess 1 day but you have to play until the opponent resigns, also you cannot draw nor attempt checkmates
This was never gonna be a win since 50 moves then the enemy only has one king and they fail to capture any pieces(pawns included) then the game is a auto draw
Actually the 50 move rule resets when a pawn moves or a piece is captured, so you can waste 49 moves, then push a pawn, then waste another 49 moves, push the pawn....
chess but u cant ocapture the enemy pawns with your pawns. You can capture them with the other pieces
Finally a normal game, yesss!!
Yea lol #never resign
I didn’t even notice the video was 10 minutes
Litterally any move
Chess simp:
*VERY AGGRESSIVE*
You should've let him take the rook at the end to win a few dozen more moves, since he'll most likely go for the pawn next, and eventually you'll be able to promote and win the game.
Agent Simp, We have been losing a lot of material in the recent matches, we have lost a lot of those matches or ended up with only very little army alive. We need to do something about this. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, 100 rated chess, but you must win the game without losing any pieces/material.
I think for a 100 move challenge you need some other timing setting. Maybe something which gives time back after every move?
I’ve seen enough, im satisfied.
"The one where I kept trying to lose my material advantage but couldn't"
W.T.F indeed!😂
valiant effort nonetheless
Blundered a bishop had me thinking for a minute 😅
Worth every penny
Finally
10 minute long video
Throwing away material is a surefire way to get to endgame quickly, which is not what you want.
you should have sacrificed the rook and the pawn at that moment
Damn. Well at least you get to play kind of normal chess
Nice game! Maybe you shoud have let that rook onboard, so he wouldn´t resign
Exactly what I was thinking too, like he should have let the king take his rook and then try to promote that pawn to a rook.
Chess but your deeply worried about your opponents emotional reactions
Title: - Normal chess.
.
.
In video: - 2 En-Passant
.
.
🙃🙂🙃
when the opponent has half of their time left at move 20 that's quite obvious it won't last until move 100
even if he hadnt resigned, it would still have been a draw since you are not allowed to go over 40 moves without capturing anything
Or a pawn move, which resets the counter.
Probaly your longest video ever
6:32 your opponents 24th move did in fact not blunder the bishop, as after your Rb1 move, they could've gone Qe5, attacking your a1 rook, so the b1 rook would be needed as a defender. None the less, they did blunder a bishop.
There is a check on a5
@@mycricketingworld5328 I hope you mean a6, as a5 is protected by the bishop... but it doesn't work anyway, as you can then block with the bishop on d6
granted, the follow up trade is not favorable but I actually didn't run that far through with it in my initial assessment.
@@monsieurnamenlos8487 yea I meant a6, was a typo
@@monsieurnamenlos8487 yeah, blocking with the bishop is an option, but then white can take with the knight. The queen should not sacrifice itself for a knight and a rook (mind you, black already lost the bishop, so even if Rook +Knight for a Queen isn't that bad, in this situation it is bad).
Chess, but the bishops won't let the knights bring their horseys into church, so now they're fighting. If your bishop is within range of your knight, and vice versa, they'll fight each other and the video ends (This doesn't apply to opponent's pieces). BxB or NxN also ends the video.
Message your opponent every move until you get a reply
WOW 2 EN PASSANTS IN A GAME. BEST GAME EVER
YES!
1:04 the opponent's rating goes from (103) to (100), then at 1:14 it goes (100) and (103)
A normal game,yes!
I've had a game that lasted more than 100 moves... but the time available was 150 minutes, and the game lasted about 4 hours... this match was overwhelmingly stressful, to the point I dreamt chess moves the whole night :P
You should do more long videos!
FINALLY I REALLY WANTED THIS
6:41 g5 is genoius move... provided that you have Qe3 double + in mind which he clearly... did not have
Another issue here is 50 move rule...you took his last piece too early lol
I did the same challenge with only Moving the King and 8 Pawns against a 800 Rated.
Just completely lock down everything with your Pawns and then they have no Idea how to proceed to do anything so you just run around with your King behind the locked Pawns chains.
Then after 50 moves trade of something and you are good to go.
You won't even reach the Engage before Move 200
You should have left him bishop and knight and lost all your own pieces. He would never figure out mate.
Don't worry I am watching your videos for 2 months every morning, and I never get bored
"We get a 103 from the US... With premium membership... and a cat profile picture... e4" IDK why this is so funny to me
I'll pretty sure the way to win this challenge is to leave opponent with two Knights and make them check mate you
We were on the verge of greatness, we were this close
I bet this guy is just scared he'll lose without a challenge forcing his mind to overcomplicate everything.
He come to know that you are pranking him you shouldn't had to take his rook
THE GUY PLAYED EN PASSENT!
Should have blundered the rook and used to pawn promotion
He probably had his mind blown when you en passant him
Mission failed successfully.
was more like watching "chess but I'm trying not to make the opponent resign"
It's not surprising he resigned, he probably thought you were bullying him :)
4:10 He would have killed your pawn, regardless of if it is a queen, rook, or anything else.
hearing the robot voice say a hundred dollar means a lot to it is so funny
This is how Stockfish views us
If you get checked at the square c4 then anything will blow up
Could’ve left his rook on the board as false hope. Or let his king take your rook after you took his
That End was a lost Game for him und he was just being bullied no Wonder he Gave up.
This is a hidden achievement, called Marathon.
I have no idea why that en passant made me so excited.
Wow this is unusual
I've only got past 100 moves once while playing a bot in a position that is just completely a draw, waiting for it to blunder and let my pawn go 😂
100 rated chess bus you have to win under 20 moves
I love how you care about him getting sad
Thanks, Brad Smart!
1:17 :That doesn't blunder a pawn, that is the kiddie countergambit. IMHO, it is the best answer to the wayward queen attack, not because it is unusually strong, but more because the traditional response is pretty easy to figure out, while the correct response to the kiddie countergambit is pretty tricky and sharp. Especially to the kind of player who is playing the wayward queen attack. lol.
Should have let him take the pawn so it's a rook endgame, might have not conceaded the
if you attempted to checkmate with just the rook and king you could have lasted for 100 turns
always happens to me and I hate it
if your opponent blunders, you continue the video capturing only with your king
If u capture a piece the video ends
Haha! Can't catch me babe 🤣
You shouldn't cut his king off with the rook, trapping his king in a small rectangle just makes him feel despair and resign.
You should just guard the pawn with the rook and make those king moves. This gives his king freedom to move to almost the entire board so he will fell less despair and it is less likely that he would resign.
Actually what I would do is to just make random checks to the king with the rook while guarding the pawn with the king
after it's over move 50, I will just blunder the pawn and continue to give random checks as if I don't know how to checkmate the lone king with a rook, so it gives him hope to draw with the 50 moves rule and not resign
I wouldn’t care the only reason I would resign is that in endgame the opponent can’t attack me and he only has one room so there’s no way to checkmate me
I mean rook
I thought you were going to make a closed position and just take it as slow as possible
you won!
what the fu-
8:26
i was saying that if his knight does not take it you will loose bc rook to h1 is a checkmate
Me in a rpg preffering looks over stats in items: 7:36
Challenge, try to draw by 50 move rule