Tesla Cybertruck - Crash tests
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
- Tesla Cybertruck - Crash tests
#tesla #teslacybertruck #teslamodels #teslanews #4drivetime #truck #crash #crashtest
.........
♬ MUSIC ♬
Iceland by Alex-Productions
• Epic Cinematic Adventu...
Music promoted by onsound.eu/
.............
Hope you enjoy this video and leave your comment bellow. To stay up to date with alot of new Videos
Subscribe now 👉 goo.gl/M7yJtf
Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications
Follow us
Facebook : www. 4dri...
twitter : / 4drivetime
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Subscribe now 👉 goo.gl/M7yJtf
Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications
Crumble zone is very short. A huge force is delivered to passengers. Are there any statistics available of how big are the forces and what happens to passengers actually?
Does it matter when the batteries burst into flames you get toasted, would you rather be conscious or unconscious when the flames and toxic fume start.
@@duckmyass Yeah it does matter, in a crash. EV battery fires happen less then ICE car fires do. Let's say I am wrong (and i could be) with no crumple zones THE IMPACT WILL KILL U FIRST. Now lets say you survive a impact you could still have a chance to get out before a battery fire gets bad enough that it could kill you.
DISCLAIMER: I'm 14 most of my knowledge is from various papers and youtube videos so please take these with some salt but don't dismiss the latter statement.
Bro trippin
@@duckmyass lol thats not what happens lol
35mph to 0 in 0.1 seconds, so
15.65 (in m/s)*1/0.1s = 156.5m/s², so that's the acceleration they experience
156.5m/s²*75kg = 18.019kN, or about 1800kg, or a bit 4000lbs of force during the crash, which is a lot i'd reckon.
35 mph frontal looks brutal lol
It would be if it had an engine right there
@@SosaKinkosthe energy from the impact is going straight to the passengers. literal death trap
@@JoeYaPookie1818 ok
It absorbed the energy
@@TeJoeTheHoe cars are supposed to crumple during crashes. when they don’t the energy goes straight through the vehicle and it’s passengers. same reason hard hats are supposed to break on impact
I'd love to see a Euro NCAP test. Especially the pedestrian test, I think it would be carnage. US laws must be very relaxed to allow these to be sold.
They're not being shipped to anyone just yet, probably for these reasons, and I doubt they will be coming out sooner than 2025.
I thought the same thing. No way these things are making it to Europe fortunately.
They won't come to EU due to weight. It will require a different driving licence class to drive one
@LastRookie bro they everywhere now wym I've seen two regular silver ones and two army green ones on the road
@@antwontwontwon2378bullshit cybertrucks are under eu not street allowed because they dont even have a crumble zone lol
The only truck on the market where hitting a deer is worse for the driver than the deer
you would not even notice the deer it would just smear blood on the front
@@Aku6Soku1Zan Said like someone who's never hit a deer, even a small one (~70kg) at high velocity (~100 km/h) can easily cause an impact force on the thousands of Newtons.
its much more likely to be a human rather than a deer
@@hoodrich6380 That's true, and another reason why this truck is a moving safety hazard.
@@followthelucario4388no calculate the impact force of the 3 ton car. A deer isnt the foe of this car not even another car. Walls will kill people
Normal people: The cybertruck failed all of the tests and is clearly a death trap.
Musk bro's: Successful tests, useful data.
I mean I'm not much of a Tesla fan, personally like Japanese and Korean brands myself personally, but all things considered I'd say the truck probably did well. The front took most the impact, the side collision didn't crumple in two, and overall looks like it held up well on the rollover. Although I can definitely see it needs more curtain airbags, I mean my Hyundai has one for fucks sake lol, and that thing is definitely cheaper than a Cyber truck.
@@TomyPesantesthe force of the impact is gonna go straight to the passengers. crumple zones are necessary
@@JoeYaPookie1818don't u see what happened in the frontal collision? It crumpled, that is what it's supposed to do a truck with a big diesel guzzling engine on the other hand wouldn't have the same results
@@TomyPesantes Except it didn't do well as the rare passenger ended up taking most of the force in the crash.
@@JoeYaPookie1818 Wasn't the front enough of a crumple zone?unless there's more video showing the legs of the test dummy getting crushed I didn't see maybe.
Crashing a CT into a wall will kill the passengers. Crashing a CT into any other car on the road will kill the passengers in that car. Mass marketing a tank like this to consumers is reckless and irresponsible, especially considering the performance on offer.
Crashing a CT into ANY CHRYSLER/ANY JEEP/ANY DODGE/ANY RAM 1941-PRESENT WILL BLOW UP THE CHRYSLER/JEEP/DODGE/RAM!
Correction, hitting another car in a CT will kill the passengers in the other car and the ones in the CT.
Thankfully this nonsense is banned I the EU
@@bln35one could imagine that the ct would use the other car as a crumple zone, almost like a trash compactor and slow down a little less rapidly
@@aryanrahman6788 straight out of Final Destination jfc..
@@aryanrahman6788love this haha
You can clearly see the force of the impact being transfered through the subframe. Looks like rear wishbone snapped - Deathtrap.
You can clearly see the lack of intelligence of OP: exoskeleton doesn't have a subframe
No deformation of the sides so you just hoping on airbags to decelerate you. You can see a lot of people are going to get a lot of internal injuries
@@runlit120 It doesn’t have an exoskeleton. It’s a monocoque with heavy steel external panels.
I dont think its snapped, but if you think of the forces involved in stopping a 35" truck tyre at 35mph then theres gonna be a lot of flex there, especially as its not a normal live axle cos of all the rear wheel steer gubbins attached, you can see at the end of the side shot of the rear wheel start to rotate back around the axis of where the top ball joint would be, if it was off it would continue forward...BUT I wouldnt be surprised if the wishbones been tweeked so far out of alignment at least to need a replacement anyway...not that you'll be caring about that from the associated head and neck trauma from the crash.
@@runlit120cybertruck doesn't have an exoskeleton
Making cars without crumple zones isn't 'innovation' they were there for a very very good reason
I'm wondering if they're banking the sheer mass/weight of the vehicle to absorb the energy. But in saying that, if the other vehicle is light....god help the occupants. They'll be crushed.
@@jimijacksonI definitely wouldn’t. The soft bumpers and crumple zones would normally help absorb, but this thing genuinely looks like a death trap
It has the same amount as the f150 that is rated #1 in crash safety.
@@jimijacksonif they’re banking on that it’s a terrible idea, the weight and solidity of it would basically make it a giant steal block, which the energy would go right through until it hits air.
Correct me if I’m wrong though, it’s been a few years since I took physical science. Just saying what seems most logical, kinda like throwing a brick at a wall and a sponge if that makes sense?
which is why they built the cybertruck with a crumple zone
at 35mph, everyone in that car is dead
i’m more concerned about everyone out of that car. that’s a fucking weapon
They looked fine...
@@caninflor5984you can see how little energy was absorbed, the deceleration was incredibly rapid, , that is because the body is not absorbing the energy by deforming.
So it is transferring the energy into other parts, like the passengers
It could be the rear steering breaking.
@@millersethe that aside, basic physics says that the energy of that collision will go into passengers, that's why we have crumple zones
Looks deadly.
most pickup trucks are :(
It is
most pickups crumple well but don't have strong cabins. This truck has the exact opposite problem. Cabin is strong but it does not crumple well@@NithinJune
It’s silent but deadly
Making cars from bullet proof stainless steel is like making submarines from carbon fibre.
Not if you live in a country where massacres are the standard.
@@marcolregina Cyberpunk truck will probably never be in those countries.
@@ik749 America is that country.
@@Beer_Dad1975 Definitelly no. I would say that Isreal, Palestine and countries near that region are "those" countries. Definitely not America. America has gun problems but not to a level where you should buy Tesla Cyberpunk.
@@ik749 I was referring to the US.
You're gonna die at 35mph. Imagine you hit something at 60. This thing is a LITERAL death trap
SO ARE ALL CHRYSLERS/ALL JEEPS/ALL DODGES/ALL RAMS 1941-PRESENT!
@@NigelMontezumaare you comparing 1941 vehicles to a 2023 truck in terms of safety?
I'm sure engineers know what are they doing. The car is perfectly safe. The front crumples, the cabin stayed intact, airbags deployed. Plus this is worst case scenario completely rigid barrier.
@@dkdanis1340 it barely crumpled. depending on the crumple zones of other vehicles is not a good idea
@@dkdanis1340worst case scenario. Ok up the speed. That's worse. The front barely crumples and airbags deploying won't save you from that. Stop being a fanboy or gullible to trust everything like this car.
In that first clip of the 35mph full frontal collision, is that the rear axle snapping????? I can't think of any other reason why the rear wheel would turn like that.
The Cyber truck has a 4 wheel turning, they move because they are independent.
@@thaddeussykora885 looking into that, the rear wheels can turn up to 10 degrees when moving below 40mph, but in the video it seems like they turn more than that, like they’re overextending. Definitely not as bad as a broken axle but still probably quite damaging to the vehicle.
@@thaddeussykora885Bro that's literally not what's happening. The suspension is breaking in the rear from a front end collision. Absolutely horrible.
@@elixir4419 Yeah I agree, looks waaay more than 10 degrees
@@thaddeussykora885 Regardless, it uh... Yeah, it shouldn't be doing that.
If a car doesn't crumple, you do.
the truck. it crumples.
@@bomber385r/wooosh
if you don't fly into botton blocks, pillars or houses, then everything will be crushed except the passengers and the car itself, it simply won't lose energy
Dang, that's not a whole lot of crumbling zone in the front 😬
Looks like not a lot, but probably just as much as a normal truck.
Those things have big engines in the front that don't fold.
It's a crumple zone, not crumble.
Different words with different meanings.
@@GFSTaylor Who cares?
@@capybara1555 People who don't want to be ignorant of their own language.
The passenger's bones do all the crumpling.
So they banned pop-up headlights due to pedestrian safety concerns but they allow this guillotine on wheels to drive?
your not surviving getting hit by a normal truck either.. have you watch any other truck crash test
@@zee-fr5kwSo the issue is trucks in general, they need to be scaled way way down
Not to mention that all those cars with popup headlights were beautiful to look at than this steel road tin.
exactly@@onsokumaru4663
Cause no money is made unlikes here tesla and insurance and morge get their money
All the impact looks like its going into the driver lol the door doesnt even move so you got barley any crumble zone
U dont want the door to move. But the front and rear yes
@@pummupenguin3644 i said the door should crumble as well to take impact off the driver lol you just learn to read?
You didn’t say that. YOU LEARN HOW TO READ.
@@EnvixityX-m9g "the door doesnt even move" which is saying the impact all gets sucked uo by the front vs the whole car lol you can get on as many alt account you want you still cant read
To be fair Other trucks also crumble at doors due to the Wright a lot of the energy can be absorbed by the chassis
Drivers now have 20% chance of surviving
20%? I think you're giving them too much credit. More like 0%
With all those sharp, pointy edges, no mercy to pedestrians and motorcyclists either.
Now I understand why this car is not allowed to operate in Germany, the traffic administration literally said, that this car is unsafe for the passengers. Obviously its even a bigger threat for the non passengers too xD
@@applecatnyango like any other car
@@applecatnyango name 1 car a pedestrian would survive getting hit by
I cannot wait until the IIHS gets their hand on one.
literally same the small overlap...
Did we not solve this problem, y’know, THIRTY YEARS AGO?
People forget that only cause the car looks like it handled the impact well, doesnt mean the passengers do either. If you throw a metal sphere with people inside against a mountain you might have an intact metal sphere afterwards but the passengers will be goo. Theres crumple zone for a reason. Its gradually spreading impact force on the car and not send the shock directly into its passengers. This is probably the reason why the rear axle broke. The impact shock wasnt buffered at all.
The rear axle didn't break it doesn't have an axle
Well what the hell does it have then? @@ondreyhii3831
Either way, it probably shouldn't snap like that @@ondreyhii3831
See this is actually better for the environment because it will reduce the population by being unsafe in a frontal accident. Less people means less pollution
Less people mean less people working for your pension and therefore the country will get poorer which will reduce the motivation to act sustainable. You are a smooth brainer, my friend, read more books before thinking less people are better for the enviroment. Its quite the contrary in the long term
@@romansenger2322 Bro did not get the obvious joke 💀
Those rear seat passengers are in real trouble. Even the front doesn't look like it'd be much fun.
Other trucks don’t even dare to put rear seat passengers in their frontal crash test. Go watch the videos of f150, ram, Silverado….none of them even put rear passengers in the test. Lol
the one on the front almost has a 90 degree angle at his neck, forcefully applied in milliseconds - he is most likely properly dead.
@@flixri726 Yes even the front airbag deployment looks very poor in comparison to the Dodge Ram. Kinda makes me wonder if it is due to the airbag systems being designed to work in mild steel cars they are not able to cope with the different properties of the stainless steel...
@@Beer_Dad1975and the worst thing… it was at 35MPH! And I LOOOVE Tesla fanboys how they are justifying Tesla doing this. “F150 Lightning did similarly” I just went to watch the F150 and it clearly does much better and at 45MPH.
@@RLT124 Yup - I've been trying to find the scores for the Cybertruck, but as of yet the NHTSA website just says "not rated" - I'm confused as to how they can be allowing people to drive these things on the streets with no safety rating? Certainly not legal in my country.
What a joke of a product and a colossal, predictable waste of money.
Oh damn look at all that momentum being put directly onto the people inside the car
So, what we ve learned so far is:
1. Its as safe to drive as a missile locking on you
2. Its got no crumple zones or any actual pillars to support any loads, noice
3. It cant go offroad
4. It cant do hills either
5. Its loading space is non existent, so it cant even do basic truck things (I guess loading a bicycle has become a challenge now lol)
6. Its a 3 ton EV with a build quality of a sand castle (a disaster waiting to happen, yup, my kind of humour)
7. Its expensive asf because...what, they ve paid for marketing?
lol do those people even hire engineers for their cars anymore or spend all the money on bot accounts online instead? Lmao with the disrespect, wtf do u think u are man, hell no, time to check back on real car manufacturers like BMW, VW etc who still respect the community and instead of expensive jokes they still give us solid quality for our every hard earned buck and who still have actual mechanical engineers working on their projects, not playboys with too much owned media to care for drivers lives
Not to mention the pointless acceleration. Nobody witha brain would think its smart to step on it with a full trailer. There are cars that are funner to drive and they are slower. Acceleration doesnt mean its better
"got no crumble zone"
Look at the video, it literally did crumble 😂
Also, no pillars for support? What pillars for support? When you flip over? The roof is a triangle, the strongest shape.
"It can't be offroad"
We don't know that yet.
"No loading space"
The bed is as big as your average truck's bed 🤷♀️
"It's a 3 ton ev"
It's more light weight than the f150 lighting, and the rivian, but no one is saying their heavy.
”expensive as hell”
The average truck on the road is worth like 66 thousand dollars, and the cybertruck ranges from 61-100k also If you look at the plaid from when it was released and how much it is now, it's 30k cheaper.
Cybertruck probably has a significant markup due to demand
Wow, so many words, not even one of them are true. This is beyond stupid.
The engineers actually tried to warn Musk that the cybertruck is a death trap but he choose not to listen. They even tried to make an alternative design but Musk being a narcissistic manchild wasn't going to let them.
@@TeJoeTheHoewe dont saw it offroading for good reason 😁
Funnier is, this thing is 20% smaller than usually announced, but has 30% less range...and if you want more range (and still not as much as advertised), the bed gets smaller 😂
Its a shitbox with 2 million preorders (1 million from Teslaemployees to feed the hype btw)
So what's this beer can like as an impact partner, when it inevitably crashes into someone else?
Any test results on pedestrians impact.
Beer can clearly has better crumple zones.
Errr...They probably wont be showing the pedestrian impact data, I can imagine it looking like a scene from the Final Destination movies just by the design lol
Dude it's literally shaped like a wedge, it has a sharp angle, this thing is inches away from being a guillotine
> be Elon
> Build meme car
> Shit on competition
> release overhyped car for more than promised
> car turns out to be a death trap
> lmao
> be Elon 💀
Holy moly! After only a few inches of crumbling, it stops so quickly that the back wheel has a noticeable flex, maybe even broken struts. And look at the child-sized dummy folding on the back seat. 😧
So the driver's neck snaps, and the back passenger's head is caved in. Great work Musk
The windows of the side impact didn't shatters, so it is somehow bulletproof
Shouldn't be, Teslas have a tendency to catch on fire. What good is a bulletproof window if firemen can't save the person inside?
bullet proof but not fire proof
@@duckmaster_6980 reminds me of the seen from black ops two of the burning dude
The firefighters saving the occupations will have to use the touch panel to open the door lol
A vehicle that is prone to catch fire from hell and has bulletproof shell with bulletproof windows. Some people are asking to be roasted alive inside these road vaults.
Looks better after the crash.
😅😅
This reminds me of 70's cars crashing as in yeah the car doesn't deform much but a ton of the forces are transferred into the cabin and thus the passengers.
Crumples zones: *exist*
Tesla Engineers: ?!
That's what fascinates me honestly. Like all teslas so far were incredibly safe, why did they just completely ignore safety with this one?
@@Lavos_Prime I think it is because they decided to make the body out of stainless steel, just because Elon Musk liked the look of it/wanted to pretend the car is bulletproof.
There’s over a foot of crumple zone. There’s no steering column. There’s no engine. The dash is so far forward that even the dash could crumple without intruding on the survival space. The dummy’s head did not go through the airbag and instead was cushioned by it. Looks do not tell the story in this scenario
if you look at some of Sandy Munro’s teardown videos (for R1T) you’ll note that they talk about “hard points” inside the crush path or crumple zone - these hard points are moments of sudden acceleration during a crash that are unavoidable in a vehicle with an engine block or poor design. It’s totally possible to have less of a crumple zone but one that is tightly controlled without any hard points.
@@notmyfaultthisishappening3795exactly
Me, with my ribs piercing my lungs after a crash in my cybertruck: E-Elon m-musk is s-so cool.
"Lost my arms and legs but still love the truck!"
The 35 MPH full barrier (Tesla shown) crash is an archaic test . The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) have moved on to more real-world tests: the small overlap and moderate overlap. These are done at 40 MPH; that's approximately 35% more force than a test at 35 MPH. These two tests represent scenarios how cars crash in the real world and are much more challenging than an old fashioned (full) barrier crash. A full barrier crash is done by manufacturers because that is what the NHTSA/DOT requires. IIHS doesn't even do barrier tests any more as they are irrelevant compared to the results of overlaps tests. So the video Tesla released just proves they passed the bare government minimum testing to make a production vehicle.
Why are the overlap tests more demanding? A moderate overlap concentrates 100% of the crash on only 45% of the vehicles front structure; a small overlap test, on only 15% of the vehicle structure. It takes serious energy management engineering to pass these tests since only part of the car structure is available for energy management, compared to using the entire front of the car to absorb crash forces. For example, any late 1960's car will pass a full barrier test at 30 MPH with only seat belts. A moderate or small overlap test would tear such a car in two.
All manufacturers test for small and medium overlap in their own labs (plus a full barrier test at speed higher than 35 MPH) for their own purposes, but few release that footage. So manufacturers wait until IIHS (or Euro NCAP) does these tests as privately funded to accept their accolades or in many cases provide excuses (See the furor over the IIHS test of the Mercedes C class of 2012).
As for what is shown in the Tesla video, modern engineering requires a very stiff passenger compartment zone with advanced airbags working with progressive deforming zones optimized for the three types of crashed tests. So you should see little or no door or pillar deformation.
As for the rear seat passengers, a vehicle of this price range should have rear seat airbags. They rear wheel behavior? The thing has rear wheel steering, so either the steering mechanism broke or deformed, which meaningless to the result of the test.
If Tesla was truly proud of the Cyber Trucks crashworthiness, they would release video of their internal small and moderate overlap test results.
Well, the overlap tests will test whether it protects intrusion well, but they're going to reduce the rate of deceleration substantially because there's much more crumple zone. The full overlap test is good for ensuring that the vehicle and its restraints effectively manage deceleration.
You can clearly see when the crumple zones ran out, everybody in the car immediately lunged forwards, that's like 60Gs Which is enough to kill you.
A customer of mine got into the same kind of low-speed impact with a new Challenger that he did in his old 69 back in the day. Sliding on ice at 40-50 km/hr into a parked vehicle.
He said that back in the 70s his 69 came out of it basically unscathed, but he was laid up for a couple days with neck and back pain from the impact. His new Challenger looked awful though - crumpled the front end in. With the new vehicle he was fine. Walked away and had no soreness the next day - even though he was 35+ years older than the first time.
Blows my mind that Tesla is throwing away years and years of vehicle safety research and testing because Elon's got an idea.
Dang, the crumble zones are way too small. That will be a lot like crashing a pre-1990s car.
I thought the truck was doing 70mph in the beginning and thought "that's not so bad". Then realized it was at 35mph 😳. Musk keeps getting away with it.
Smooth brain you think any car would take that small of an impact at 70mph 💀 any car would of been pancaked
@@Edits007 yeah I'm clearly not as smart as the world's smartest car designer, Lord Elon.
@Edits007 They literally smashed a Smart car into a wall at 70 and it held up better than this dumpster did at 35.
"You don't need crample zone if car you hit already have one" - Tesla engineers
Imagine two cybertrucks hitting each other.
Bingo..... Other car gets messed up more
This "car" sucks ass lmaooo
I love getting turned into a fine paste after colliding with a wall at 30mph 👍👍
Tesla really went from the safest cars to one of the least safe modern cars in the world. That's... admirable?
it's as safe as other teslas???
@@Xian..going 35 miles in a crash is death.
@@harumaronnet1709no its not
@@bomber385 No crumple zone, hitting another cars could be deadly for both drivers and a roll over with the roof being made out of glass? Genius car!
My sister died going 35 miles per hour in a 2007 Nissan Maxima 💔🥺head on like this. The baby in the backseat her daughter was in a car seat and survived without a scratch. So sad… I know that has nothing to do with this cyber truck but it made me think of her😭
I'm glad I saw this. I be extra careful around CTs, because it doesn't look like any accident is survivable for anyone in the other vehicle. This thing is a destroyer, and fatality rates on accidents involving them are going to be massive in a few years.
I love how we can’t have pop up headlights for pedestrian safety but this POS is allowed to exist
"The Cybertruck has unbreakable windows"
Cybertruck: Windshield breaks at frontal crash test
I was hoping it would be like Geoff's crash test in Top Gear where the truck is basically "indestructible".
Exactly
Love the 10 centimetres of crumple zone in the front. The sheer force from that would feel really nice on the passenger(s).
Front crash everyone dies, side crash good luck not eating out of a tube, and who the fuck is nearly rolling at 16mph?!
How about if cybertruck hit cybertruck?
wow that has like zero frontal crumple zone.
Great comments I learn way more from the comments than the videos. Viewers are so knowledgeable
So you're safe from shootings but die if you hit an obstacle because the crumple zone isn't sufficient? Which of these scenarios is more likely? In addition, the chance for pedestrians to survive an accident with the Cybertruck is probably also quite low. This is what happens when you subordinate all functionality to a radical design.
well it's made for america...
And design wise...it doesn't even look good. I mean, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and such such, but that's one ugly looking car.
And design wise...it doesn't even look good. I mean, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and such such, but that's one ugly looking car.
I thought that Cybertrucks were indistructible
Is true btw (by commenter)
Wasn't Model Y or Model 3 the safest car for a while? What happened to safety at Tesla honestly, because CT just screams death trap.
Elon flushed it down the twitter sink. Let that sin in
its ugly anyway
The biggest problem for THE CYBERTRUCK is that it doesn't have crumpling areas, and it stops very suddenly because almost at the exact moment it hits the car's column is already bending a little, but just like the Car stops immediately and whoever is inside could get badly hurt or even have organ damage
The cybertruck is a giant danger on the streets for other cars, because it is an extremely heavy and resistant vehicle that literally does not dent and can hit other cars, in the United States It's a minor problem because even the cheapest cars are very safe, I try up to 6 airbags, but in my country Teslas are not sold but there are people who bring them here, in this case here and Brazil, Here the crash tests are much less rigid and most cars come with only 2 airbags, and the structures are not as reinforced because there is no small olverlap crash test, and here if a Cybertruck if it hit a cheap car here, I'll use a Fiat Mobi as an example, the Fiat would have its entire front completely destroyed, the columns completely destroyed and bent and there would be an intrusion So big in the cabin that the seats would go backwards and the rear occupants would be pressed in just like those in the front, but the cybertruck would be practically intact, this crash will be the only 70~90km/h
Yeah.. I think there is a reason why we only got 48 seconds of crash testing this thing
Cybertruck:not scratched driver:hospital for 8 days
The rear wheels on the frontal 35 😂😂😂😂
Yeah, I'm gonna nope out of having my neck bent backwards that much, and in a low-speed collision at that.
You can clearly see that the crumple zone is entirely eaten up before it comes to a stop and rebounds. The moment it rebounds, it does so with enough force to destroy the rear axles. You can also clearly see the dashboard crumpling. Now, if that is designed to happen, it may be adding additional crumple space to protect passengers, but the standard of design is for the interior to not be modified during a crash, because that's where people are. This could be safe, but seems to not be due to compromising the interior at such a low speed head-on collision.
I also find it suspicious that there is no footage of higher speed tests anywhere that I can find. Why would there not be footage of those unless it is being hidden?
Too much Interpretation by you
The rear axle doesnt snap. This is the behavior of cars wirh 4 wheel steering, my friend.
Imagine the crash test small overlap, it will be HORROROUS
That frontal was 35??? Looked like 65
A car the world don't need.
The rear axel snaps at 35 MPH or am I wrong? Without a crush zone, isn't that all the force of impact going through the car (including the people in it?) Wouldn't that be like... fatality at 35 MPH?
Don’t think it snaps. It doesn’t have a live rear axle, so there’s nothing to snap. There’s rear-wheel steering in this car, so the flex you’re seeing is reflective of that.
It certainly looks like really, really bad news for the rear passengers - front might be survivable but I think you'd be in hospital for quite some time.
i love how the crumple zone goes like this:
paper paper paper paper paper paper paper ADAMANTINE ALLOY FORGED IN THE HEART OF A DYING NEUTRON STAR
Making it out of the 1940s crash safety with this one.
the crumple zone is so short that the people in the car are dead at 30 mph because all the energy from the crash after the crumple has stopped is going straight to the driver and the passengers.
So what does the crash test dummy's g-force-o-meter read?
The numbers I got are 63 g over 26 milliseconds. The marker on the dummy's head goes from 35 mph to zero in about 12 frames of the (original) video at about 470 frames per second, assuming it's really 35 mph and using the length of the car from Wikipedia. That's a pretty bad punch.
Why is the side impact test on just a frame with no mass behind it?
Why is the roll over at just 16mph? No car EVER rolls at that speed
Is this supposed to be reassuring? All that energy transferd to the pasengers. Also, wven the rear axel got wrecked and it didn't receive direct impact.
there is no rear axle it has 4 wheel steering so it breaks much easier, but this is *not* a safe car nonetheless
@@willy13-b2tyeah. It may be weaker than an axle, but it should be stronger than, say, a human neck
I really dont like how far the dummy's head went back when hitting the airbag. I dont know if thats just the way airbags are, but some chest support would probably help keep the head aligned with the torso.
This is making me rethink my pre order a little bit haha
Why? This is not taking into account the car's other collision detection safety features which are state of the art.
Also it's a solid wall test and not a test of rear ending another car, truck or poll... These tests are considered outdated for a reason.
@@colliric I decided against ordering the Cybertruck. It doesn’t fit my personality at all. I don’t need the rush of people gawking at my vehicle every time I go out.
@Nate-np5tt you mean laughing at you
Side impact looks really good, roll over too, I suppose thanks to the batteries, I wonder how the bed mounted optional battery will affect that.
The front impact though looks terrible, the rear end breaking apart is an indication of massive forces being transmitted through the truck, unless it's poor quaity. Anyway it doesn't crumple much and doesn't give a good vibe.
No crumple zones whatsoever. All the force of the crash and deceleration is transmitted directly to the passengers. Damn. That's scary how bad it is.
That South African muskmelon is destroying Tesla! Now he's trying to tell us in a couple years he's going to have a new vehicle that goes from 0-60 in less than a second. That's faster than a hand clap folks! Not gonna happen! I'm no physics professor but let that swirl around in your noodle for a second and you'll arrive at my conclusion inside of two short swirls!
Deathtrap. Lmao.
Was the crashtest meant for the solid steel wall?
from the start i knew the drumple zone wouldnt be very good
the *crumple* zone is fine. wouldn't be very legal if it wasn't
I would encourage anyone watching this to compare with F150 full frontal 35mph test. Looks very similar to me.
As an vehicle safety engineer and someone who isn't a Tesla fan I agree that the footage of the frontal impact doesn't look tooo good.
BUT: Judging the crash performance based on video only without considering the actual sensor data of the dummys is clickbait and not right.
The same goes with pedestrian protection. Determining the performance based on the looks of a car doesn't work. The structures under the "skin" can be soft even if the shape looks dangerous. The sensor data of the pedestrian impactors is what counts.
So I will form my opinion after I have seen the actual results.
I'm shocked how many "experts" are here that can run a vehicle safety lab without sensors 😲
So the Truck looks dangerous but you think its good?
@@safakhan3088NO, without the test results no one can say if the vehicle is "good" or "bad".
Unfortunately most videos and articles on the internet have clickbait titles but do not contain actual test results (=data from sensors in the dummies).
Please google/read the road&track article "Watch the Tesla Cybertruck Get Crash Tested". This article reflects my opinion
@@safakhan3088depending on who it's for. at a working distance of the AI and at a speed of 60 km/h it will definitely have time to brake even without a driver. but with cars: it will use someone else's body as a safety cushion, most trucks do not deform, they simply do not lose energy
A lot of people are saying that the Cybertruck is very dangerous for the passengers but no one said anything about the hummer ev? That thing weighs a literal ton more than the cyber truck and has an about the same results. Actually most pickup trucks have the same results. It’s more of a danger for the people it hits or gets hit by than the passengers and it is not teslas fault for people’s bad driving.
You would literally die at a 35 mph collision in a cybertruck
The F-150 Lightning got a great safety rating, and doesn't have massive panel gaps. Just saying!
The sky is blue and grass is green! Just saying
try rolling it over at 60 and seeing if it splits open the way I thinnk it will because of its shape.
Bro the fucking rear suspension snappped from a frontal impact 😂😂. You can't make this shit up, this thing is a death trap.
That frontal crash looked painful. And the passengers in the back are going to have whiplash for months.
What is a crumple zone
Basically the front of the car crumples so that way you slow down and aren’t launched forward at 60mph in a head on collision
@@toaster1443 that was a rethorikal question. but anyway thanks for answering
People saying this test was bad need to watch more crash tests.
theres no crumple zone lol
It's actually insane that it passed any sorts of test. Like... just no. And I love Tesla.
true. im a fan too, the stock treated me very well and im all in. But this is looking really scary. As a cyclist i dont want to share a road with such beasts. I hope its not that bad, but common sense says you dont wanna get hit by "hard fucking steel" edge. Im not sure i like many of these driving around in my city.
Maye its good that the crash test looks like shit. So the drivers rather drive carefully than feel over confident or safe in a crash.
Rollover - really good
Side impact - i think good
Front impact - worse than worse
Instant death at 35 miles
Why did the back wheel go all wobbly after the crash?
Absolutely embarrassing 😂 If you understand even high school level physics, that thing is a death trap
Bro is onto nothing🙏🙏🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🥶🥶💀💀
Not the best test in the world, but I think your overexaggerating a bit
What's the NCAP rating?
ncap hasnt tested it yet
cant wait for them to get hands on one
They hasnt tested it. Im really curious
So there seems to be a pretty big misconception with this crash test. A lot of other people are comparing it to car that have a similar test. This is a full contact crash test where the entire front takes the impact while most crash testing is done on a partial front crash where the beam it hits only impacts a section of the front. The full impact is puts a lot more stress on the vehicle compare to the partial. If you compare video footage of a f150 doing the full frontal crash the results are the same to slightly worst the cybertruck. Overall the cybertruck is still very safe if you are in it but if you are on the outside you’re probably dead. Moreover the reason the back wheel almost comes off is due to it actually not being connected to the frame as it is a 4 wheel steering vehicle
as a mechanical engineer this is the only reasonable comment. Lot of disgruntled political people and people who hate EVs or the Cybertruck for inane emotional reasons being a peanut gallery of layman dipshits.
If you you crash with this maybe about 25 km/h how big is the damage to the whole car?? In other cars the bumper is meant to be bit soft so the frame doesn't damage in lower speeds, and Pedestrians dont get killed. So how about this?
I'm not an expert but 35mph head on looks pretty painful, especially in the rear seats.
Where is the half overlap crashes? Or the 20% overlap crashes?
Tesla doesn’t want you to see those.